20-F
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 20-F
(Mark One)
|
|
|
o |
|
REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR (g) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
OR
|
|
|
þ |
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934 |
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934 |
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934 |
Date of event requiring shell company report
For the transition period from to
Commission file number
001-33311
Navios Maritime Holdings Inc.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Not Applicable
(Translation of Registrants Name into English)
Republic of Marshall Islands
(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
85 Akti Miaouli Street
Piraeus, Greece 185 38
(Address of principal executive offices)
Kenneth
R. Koch, Esq., Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C., Tel: (212) 935-3000,
Fax: (212) 983-3115, The Chrysler Center, 666 Third Avenue, New York, New York 10017
(Name, Telephone, E-mail and/or Facsimile number and Address of Company Contact Person)
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
|
|
Title of each class
|
|
Name of each exchange on which registered |
|
|
|
Common Stock, par value $.0001 per share
|
|
New York Stock Exchange LLC |
|
|
|
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act.
|
|
None |
|
|
|
Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act.
|
|
None |
Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuers classes of capital or common
stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report:
100,488,784 as of December 31, 2008.
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of
the Securities Act. Yes o No þ
If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not
required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer or a non-accelerated filer. See the definition of
accelerated filer and large
accelerated filer, in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer þ
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
|
Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial
statements included in this filing: U.S. GAAP þ International Financial Reporting Standards
as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board o Other o
If Other has been checked in response to the previous question, indicate by check mark which
financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow. Item 17 o Item 18 o
If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as
defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Annual Report should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements
and accompanying notes included in this report.
Navios Maritime Holdings Inc., or the Company, desires to take advantage of the safe harbor
provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and is including this cautionary
statement in connection with this safe harbor legislation. This document and any other written or
oral statements made by us or on our behalf may include forward-looking statements, which reflect
our current views with respect to future events and financial performance. The words believe,
expect, anticipate, intend, estimate, forecast, project, plan,
potential, will, may, should and similar expressions identify forward-looking
statements.
Please note in this annual report, we, us, our, the Company and Navios
Holdings all refer to Navios Maritime Holdings Inc. and its subsidiaries.
The forward-looking statements in this document are based upon various assumptions, many of
which are based, in turn, upon further assumptions, including without limitation, managements
examination of historical operating trends, data contained in our records, and other data available
from third parties. Although we believe that these assumptions were reasonable when made, because
these assumptions are inherently subject to significant uncertainties and contingencies which are
difficult or impossible to predict and are beyond our control, we cannot assure you that we will
achieve or accomplish these expectations, beliefs or projections.
In addition to these important factors and matters discussed elsewhere herein, important
factors that, in our view, could cause actual results to differ materially from those discussed in
the forward-looking statements include the strength of world economies, fluctuations in currencies
and interest rates, general market conditions, including fluctuations in charter hire rates and
vessel values, changes in demand in the dry-bulk shipping industry, changes in the Companys
operating expenses, including bunker prices, dry docking and insurance costs, changes in
governmental rules and regulations or actions taken by regulatory authorities, potential liability
from pending or future litigation, general domestic and international political conditions,
potential disruption of shipping routes due to accidents or political events, and other important
factors described from time to time in the reports filed by the Company with the Securities and
Exchange Commission.
We undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement or statements to reflect
events or circumstances after the date on which such statement is made or to reflect the occurrence
of unanticipated events. New factors emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for us to
predict all of these factors. Further, we cannot assess the impact of each such factor on our
business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to
be materially different from those contained in any forward-looking statement.
1
PART I
Item 1. Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisers
Not Applicable.
Item 2. Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable
Not Applicable.
Item 3. Key Information
A. Selected Financial Data
Navios Holdings historical successor information is derived from the audited consolidated
financial statements of Navios Holdings as of December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 and for the period
from August 26, 2005 to December 31, 2005. The Navios Holdings historical predecessor information
is derived from the audited consolidated financial statements for the period from January 1, 2005
to August 25, 2005 not included in this document. Navios Holdings balance sheet data as of
December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004, and the historical information for the year ended December 31,
2005 and 2004 is derived from the audited financial statements which are not included in this
document. The purchase of the net assets of Navios Holdings by International Shipping Enterprises
Inc. (ISE), through the purchase of all of its outstanding shares of common stock, and the
subsequent downstream merger of ISE with and into Navios Holdings took place on August 25, 2005.
The information is only a summary and should be read in conjunction with the historical
consolidated financial statements and related notes contained herein.
2
The historical successor and predecessor results included below and elsewhere in this document
are not necessarily indicative of the future performance of Navios Holdings.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor |
|
|
Successor |
|
|
Successor |
|
|
Successor |
|
|
|
Predecessor |
|
|
|
Year |
|
|
Year |
|
|
Year |
|
|
August 26, |
|
|
|
January 1, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
2005 to |
|
|
|
2005 to |
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
August 25, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars - except per share data) |
|
Statement of Income Data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
1,246,062 |
|
|
$ |
758,420 |
|
|
$ |
205,375 |
|
|
$ |
76,298 |
|
|
|
$ |
158,630 |
|
|
$ |
279,184 |
|
Gain (loss) on forward
freight agreements |
|
|
16,244 |
|
|
|
26,379 |
|
|
|
19,786 |
|
|
|
(2,766 |
) |
|
|
|
2,869 |
|
|
|
57,746 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Time charter, voyage and
logistic business expenses |
|
|
(1,066,239 |
) |
|
|
(557,573 |
) |
|
|
(84,225 |
) |
|
|
(39,119 |
) |
|
|
|
(91,806 |
) |
|
|
(179,732 |
) |
Direct vessel expenses |
|
|
(26,621 |
) |
|
|
(27,892 |
) |
|
|
(19,863 |
) |
|
|
(3,137 |
) |
|
|
|
(5,650 |
) |
|
|
(8,224 |
) |
General and administrative
expenses |
|
|
(40,001 |
) |
|
|
(23,058 |
) |
|
|
(15,057 |
) |
|
|
(4,582 |
) |
|
|
|
(9,964 |
) |
|
|
(12,722 |
) |
Depreciation and
amortization |
|
|
(57,062 |
) |
|
|
(31,900 |
) |
|
|
(37,129 |
) |
|
|
(13,504 |
) |
|
|
|
(3,872 |
) |
|
|
(5,925 |
) |
Provision for losses on
accounts receivable |
|
|
(2,668 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,242 |
) |
|
|
(411 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(294 |
) |
Gain on sale of
assets/partial sale of
subsidiary |
|
|
27,817 |
|
|
|
167,511 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income from
investments in finance
lease |
|
|
2,185 |
|
|
|
3,507 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
7,753 |
|
|
|
10,819 |
|
|
|
3,832 |
|
|
|
1,163 |
|
|
|
|
1,350 |
|
|
|
789 |
|
Interest expense and
finance cost, net |
|
|
(49,128 |
) |
|
|
(51,089 |
) |
|
|
(47,429 |
) |
|
|
(11,892 |
) |
|
|
|
(1,677 |
) |
|
|
(3,450 |
) |
Other income |
|
|
948 |
|
|
|
445 |
|
|
|
1,819 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
|
1,426 |
|
|
|
374 |
|
Other expense |
|
|
(12,584 |
) |
|
|
(2,046 |
) |
|
|
(472 |
) |
|
|
(226 |
) |
|
|
|
(757 |
) |
|
|
(1,438 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before equity in net
earnings of affiliated
companies and joint venture |
|
|
46,706 |
|
|
|
273,523 |
|
|
|
20,395 |
|
|
|
1,876 |
|
|
|
|
50,549 |
|
|
|
126,369 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in net earnings of
affiliated companies and
joint venture |
|
|
17,431 |
|
|
|
1,929 |
|
|
|
674 |
|
|
|
285 |
|
|
|
|
788 |
|
|
|
763 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before taxes and
minority interest |
|
$ |
64,137 |
|
|
$ |
275,452 |
|
|
$ |
21,069 |
|
|
$ |
2,161 |
|
|
|
$ |
51,337 |
|
|
$ |
127,132 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
56,113 |
|
|
|
(4,451 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income before minority
interest |
|
$ |
120,250 |
|
|
$ |
271,001 |
|
|
$ |
21,069 |
|
|
$ |
2,161 |
|
|
|
$ |
51,337 |
|
|
$ |
127,132 |
|
Minority interest |
|
|
(1,723 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
118,527 |
|
|
$ |
271,001 |
|
|
$ |
21,069 |
|
|
$ |
2,161 |
|
|
|
$ |
51,337 |
|
|
$ |
127,132 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incremental fair value of
securities offered to
induce warrants exercise |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,195 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income available to common
shareholders |
|
$ |
118,527 |
|
|
$ |
266,806 |
|
|
$ |
21,069 |
|
|
$ |
2,161 |
|
|
|
$ |
51,337 |
|
|
$ |
127,132 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of
shares, basic |
|
|
104,343,083 |
|
|
|
92,820,943 |
|
|
|
54,894,402 |
|
|
|
40,189,356 |
|
|
|
|
874,584 |
|
|
|
909,205 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share |
|
$ |
1.14 |
|
|
$ |
2.87 |
|
|
$ |
0.38 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
|
$ |
58.70 |
|
|
$ |
139.83 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of
shares, diluted |
|
|
107,344,748 |
|
|
|
99,429,533 |
|
|
|
55,529,688 |
|
|
|
45,238,554 |
|
|
|
|
874,584 |
|
|
|
909,205 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
$ |
1.10 |
|
|
$ |
2.68 |
|
|
$ |
0.38 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
|
$ |
58.70 |
|
|
$ |
139.83 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Data (at
period end) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets, including
cash |
|
$ |
505,409 |
|
|
$ |
848,245 |
|
|
$ |
195,869 |
|
|
$ |
114,539 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
187,944 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
2,253,624 |
|
|
|
1,971,004 |
|
|
|
944,783 |
|
|
|
789,383 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
333,292 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities,
including current portion
of long term debt |
|
|
271,532 |
|
|
|
450,491 |
|
|
|
108,979 |
|
|
|
133,604 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
103,527 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long term debt,
including current portion |
|
|
887,715 |
|
|
|
614,049 |
|
|
|
568,062 |
|
|
|
493,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,506 |
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
805,820 |
|
|
|
769,204 |
|
|
|
274,216 |
|
|
|
207,758 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
174,791 |
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor |
|
Successor |
|
Successor |
|
Successor |
|
|
Predecessor |
|
|
Year |
|
Year |
|
Year |
|
August 26, |
|
|
January 1, |
|
|
|
|
Ended |
|
Ended |
|
Ended |
|
2005 to |
|
|
2005 to |
|
Year Ended |
|
|
December 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
August 25, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars - except per share data) |
|
Other Financial Data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by operating
activities |
|
$ |
(28,388 |
) |
|
$ |
128,075 |
|
|
$ |
56,432 |
|
|
$ |
24,371 |
|
|
|
$ |
71,945 |
|
|
$ |
137,218 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(452,637 |
) |
|
|
(16,451 |
) |
|
|
(111,463 |
) |
|
|
(119,447 |
) |
|
|
|
(4,264 |
) |
|
|
(4,967 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing
activities |
|
|
187,082 |
|
|
|
216,285 |
|
|
|
116,952 |
|
|
|
68,880 |
|
|
|
|
(50,506 |
) |
|
|
(111,943 |
) |
Book value per common share |
|
|
8.02 |
|
|
|
7.23 |
|
|
|
4.42 |
|
|
|
4.70 |
|
|
|
|
5.67 |
|
|
|
192.25 |
|
Cash dividends per common share |
|
|
0.38 |
|
|
|
0.24 |
|
|
|
0.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43.99 |
|
Cash paid for common stock dividend declared |
|
|
28,588 |
|
|
|
26,023 |
|
|
|
15,382 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,000 |
|
Adjusted EBITDA(1) |
|
$ |
165,478 |
|
|
$ |
349,875 |
|
|
$ |
103,177 |
|
|
$ |
26,537 |
|
|
|
$ |
55,696 |
|
|
$ |
135,967 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
EBITDA represents net income before interest, taxes,
depreciation and amortization. Adjusted EBITDA in this document represents EBITDA before stock based compensation. Adjusted EBITDA does not represent and should not be considered in isolation
or as a substitute for analysis of the Companys results as reported under U.S. GAAP, and our calculation of Adjusted EBITDA may not be comparable to that reported by other companies. Adjusted EBITDA is included in this
document because it is a basis upon which the Company assesses its liquidity position and because the Company believes that it presents useful information to investors regarding a Companys ability to service and/or incur
indebtedness. The following table reconciles net cash from operating activities, as reflected in the consolidated statements of cash flows, to Adjusted EBITDA: |
Adjusted EBITDA Reconciliation to Cash from Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor |
|
|
Successor |
|
|
Successor |
|
|
Successor |
|
|
|
Predecessor |
|
|
|
Year |
|
|
Year |
|
|
Year |
|
|
August 26, |
|
|
|
January 1, |
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
2005 to |
|
|
|
2005 to |
|
|
December |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
August 25, |
|
|
31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars - except per share data) |
|
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
(28,388 |
) |
|
$ |
128,075 |
|
|
$ |
56,432 |
|
|
$ |
24,371 |
|
|
|
$ |
71,945 |
|
|
$ |
137,218 |
|
Net (decrease) increase in operating assets |
|
|
(87,797 |
) |
|
|
177,755 |
|
|
|
33,065 |
|
|
|
5,864 |
|
|
|
|
(14,525 |
) |
|
|
(7,195 |
) |
Net decrease (increase) in operating liabilities |
|
|
226,145 |
|
|
|
(176,510 |
) |
|
|
(31,086 |
) |
|
|
1,720 |
|
|
|
|
21,407 |
|
|
|
3,104 |
|
Payments for drydock and special survey costs |
|
|
3,653 |
|
|
|
2,426 |
|
|
|
2,480 |
|
|
|
1,710 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest cost |
|
|
39,298 |
|
|
|
38,414 |
|
|
|
35,593 |
|
|
|
9,476 |
|
|
|
|
(98 |
) |
|
|
1,888 |
|
Provision for losses on accounts receivable |
|
|
(2,668 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,024 |
) |
|
|
(411 |
) |
|
|
|
880 |
|
|
|
573 |
|
Gain on sale of assets |
|
|
27,817 |
|
|
|
167,511 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized (loss) gain on FFA derivatives, foreign
exchange contracts, fuel swaps and interest rate
swaps |
|
|
(15,376 |
) |
|
|
10,953 |
|
|
|
12,625 |
|
|
|
(16,478 |
) |
|
|
|
(23,728 |
) |
|
|
254 |
|
Earnings in affiliates, net of dividends received |
|
|
4,517 |
|
|
|
1,251 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
(285 |
) |
|
|
|
(185 |
) |
|
|
64 |
|
Minority interest |
|
|
(1,723 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA |
|
$ |
165,478 |
|
|
$ |
349,875 |
|
|
$ |
103,177 |
|
|
$ |
26,537 |
|
|
|
$ |
55,696 |
|
|
$ |
135,967 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. Capitalization and Indebtedness
Not applicable.
C. Reasons for the Offer and Use of Proceeds
Not applicable.
4
D. Risk Factors
Some of the following risks relate principally to the industry in which we operate and our
business in general. Other risks relate principally to the securities market and ownership of our
common stock. You should carefully consider each of the following risks together with the other
information incorporated into this Annual Report when evaluating the Companys business and its
prospect. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones the Company faces.
Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to the Company or that the Company currently
considers immaterial may also impair the Companys business operations. If any of the following
risks relating to our business and operations actually occur, our business, financial condition and
results of operations could be materially and adversely affected and in that case, the trading
price of our common stock could decline, and you could lose all or part of your investment.
Risks Associated with the Shipping Industry and Our Operations
The cyclical nature of the international drybulk shipping industry may lead to decreases in charter
rates, which could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
The shipping business, including the dry cargo market, is cyclical in varying degrees,
experiencing severe fluctuations in charter rates, profitability and, consequently, vessel values.
For example, during the period from January 4, 2005 to December 31, 2008, the Baltic Exchanges
Panamax time charter average daily rates experienced a low of $3,537 and a high of $94,977.
Additionally, during the period from January 1, 2008 to December 31, 2008, the Baltic Exchanges
Capesize time charter average daily rates experienced a low of $2,316 and a high of $233,988.
Navios Holdings anticipates that the future demand for its drybulk carriers and drybulk charter
rates will be dependent upon demand for imported commodities, economic growth in the emerging
markets, including the Asia Pacific region, India and the rest of the world, seasonal and regional
changes in demand, and changes to the capacity of the world fleet. Adverse economic, political,
social or other developments have decreased demand and prospects for growth in the shipping
industry and, thereby, could reduce revenue significantly. A decline in demand for commodities
transported in drybulk carriers or an increase in supply of drybulk vessels could cause a further
decline in charter rates, which could materially adversely affect our results of operations and
financial condition.
The demand for vessels has generally been influenced by, among other factors:
|
|
|
global and regional economic conditions; |
|
|
|
|
developments in international trade; |
|
|
|
|
changes in seaborne and other transportation patterns, such as port congestion and canal closures; |
|
|
|
|
weather and crop yields; |
|
|
|
|
armed conflicts and terrorist activities; |
|
|
|
|
political developments; and |
|
|
|
|
embargoes and strikes. |
The supply of vessel capacity has generally been influenced by, among other factors:
|
|
|
the number of vessels that are in or out of service; |
|
|
|
|
the scrapping rate of older vessels; |
|
|
|
|
port and canal traffic and congestion; |
|
|
|
|
the number of newbuilding deliveries; and |
|
|
|
|
vessel casualties. |
When
our time charters expire, we may not be able to successfully replace
them.
The process for obtaining longer term time charters generally involves a lengthy and intensive
screening and vetting process and the submission of competitive bids. In addition to the quality
and suitability of the vessel, longer term shipping contracts tend to be awarded based upon a
variety of other factors relating to the vessel operator, including:
|
|
|
environmental, health and safety record; |
5
|
|
|
compliance with regulatory industry standards; |
|
|
|
|
reputation for customer service, technical and operating expertise; |
|
|
|
|
shipping experience and quality of ship operations, including cost-effectiveness; |
|
|
|
|
quality, experience and technical capability of crews; |
|
|
|
|
the ability to finance vessels at competitive rates and overall financial stability; |
|
|
|
|
relationships with shipyards and the ability to obtain suitable berths; |
|
|
|
|
construction management experience, including the ability to procure on-time
delivery of new vessels according to customer specifications; |
|
|
|
|
willingness to accept operational risks pursuant to the charter, such as allowing
termination of the charter for force majeure events; and |
|
|
|
|
competitiveness of the bid in terms of overall price. |
As a result of these factors, when our time charters expire, we cannot assure you that we will
be able to successfully replace them promptly or at all or at rates sufficient to allow us to
operate our business profitably, to meet our obligations, including payment of debt service to our
lenders, or to pay dividends. Our ability to renew the charters on our vessels on the expiration or
termination of our current charters, or, on vessels that we may acquire in the future, the charter
rates payable under any replacement charters, will depend upon, among other things, economic
conditions in the sectors in which our vessels operate at that time and the financial sector,
changes in the supply and demand for vessel capacity and changes in the supply and demand for the
transportation of commodities as described above. However, even if we are successful in employing
our vessels under longer term time charters, our vessels will not be available for trading in the
spot market during an upturn in the market cycle, when spot trading may be more profitable. If we
cannot successfully employ our vessels in profitable time charters, our results of operations and
operating cash flow could be materially adversely affected.
The economic slowdown in the Asia Pacific region has markedly reduced demand for shipping services
and has decreased shipping rates, which could adversely affect our results of operations and
financial condition.
Currently, China, Japan, other Pacific Asian economies and India are the main driving force
behind the development in seaborne drybulk trades and the demand for drybulk carriers. Reduced
demand from such economies has driven decreased rates and vessel values. A further negative change
in economic conditions in any Asian Pacific country, but particularly in China or Japan, as well as
India, may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of
operations, as well as our future prospects, by reducing demand and the resultant charter rates. In
particular, in recent years, China has been one of the worlds fastest growing economies in terms
of gross domestic product. Furthermore, the economic slowdown in the United States, the European
Union, and other countries may deepen the economic slowdown in China, among others. While the
recent introduction of a $586 billion economic stimulus package by the Chinese government is
designed, in part, to increase consumer spending and reignite the steep growth China experienced
before the recent downturn, it remains to be seen whether such a course of action by China will have the desired effect. Our financial condition and results
of operations, as well as our future prospects, would likely be adversely affected by an economic
downturn in any of these countries as such downturn would likely translate into reduced demand for
shipping services and lower shipping rates industry-wide. As a result, our operating results would
be further materially affected.
We may employ vessels on the spot market and thus expose ourselves to risk of losses based on short
term decreases in shipping rates.
We periodically employ our some of vessels on a spot basis. The spot charter market is highly
competitive and freight rates within this market are highly volatile, while longer-term time
charters provide income at pre-determined rates over more extended periods of time. We cannot
assure you that we will be successful in keeping our vessels fully employed in these short term
markets, or that future spot rates will be sufficient to enable such vessels to be operated
profitably. A significant decrease in spot market charter rates or our inability to fully employ
our vessels by taking advantage of the spot market would result in a reduction of the incremental
revenue received from spot chartering and adversely affect results of operations, including our
profitability and cash flows, with the result that our ability to pay debt service and dividends
could be impaired.
6
Trading and complementary hedging activities in freight, tonnage and Forward Freight Agreements
(FFAs) subject us to trading risks, and we may suffer trading losses which could adversely affect
our financial condition and results of operations.
Due to drybulk shipping market volatility, success in this shipping industry requires constant
adjustment of the balance between chartering-out vessels for long periods of time and trading them
on a spot basis. A long term contract to charter a vessel might lock us into a profitable or
unprofitable situation depending on the direction of freight rates over the term of the contract.
We seek to manage and mitigate that risk through trading and complementary hedging activities in
freight, tonnage and forward freight agreements, or FFAs. We are exposed to market risk in relation
to our FFAs and could suffer substantial losses from these activities in the event that our
expectations are incorrect. We trade FFAs with an objective of both economically hedging the risk
on the fleet, specific vessels or freight commitments and taking advantage of short term
fluctuations in market prices. There can be no assurance that we will be able at all times to
successfully protect ourselves from volatility in the shipping market. We may not successfully
mitigate our risks, leaving us exposed to unprofitable contracts, and may suffer trading losses
resulting from these hedging activities.
In our hedging and trading activities, we focus on short term trading opportunities where
there is adequate liquidity in order to limit the risk we are taking. There can be no assurance we
will be successful in limiting our risk, that significant price spikes will not result in
significant losses, even on short term trades, that liquidity will be available for our positions,
or that all trades will be done within our risk management policies. Any such risk could be
significant. In addition, the performance of our trading activities can significantly increase the
variability of our operating performance in any given period and could materially adversely affect
our financial condition. The FFA market has experienced significant volatility in the past few
years and, accordingly, recognition of the changes in the fair value of FFAs has caused, and could
in the future cause significant volatility in earnings.
Unrealized
losses of available for sale securities may negatively affect our
results of operations in the future.
As part of the consideration received from the sale of Navios Aurora I to Navios Maritime
Partners L.P. (Navios Partners) in July 2008, the Company received 3,131,415 common units of
Navios Partners (14.4% of the outstanding units of Navios Partners), which are accounted for under
FAS 115 as available-for-sale securities (the AFS Securities). Accordingly, unrealized gains
and losses on these securities are reflected directly in equity unless an unrealized loss is
considered other-than-temporary, in which case it is transferred to the statement of income.
As of December 31, 2008, total unrealized loss on our AFS Securities amounted to $22.6 million
representing a decline of approximately 50% of the past six months. Management evaluates securities
for other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI) on a quarterly basis. Consideration is given to (1)
the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, (2) the financial
condition and near-term prospects of the investee, and (3) the intent and ability of the Company to
retain its investment in the investee for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated
recovery in fair value.
As of December 31, 2008, management considers the decline in market valuation of these
securities to be temporary. However, there is the potential for future impairment charges relative
to these equity securities if their fair values do not recover and our OTTI analysis indicates such
write downs are necessary which may have a material adverse impact on our results of operations in
the period recognized.
7
We are subject to certain credit risks with respect to our counterparties on contracts, and the
failure of such counterparties to meet their obligations could cause us to suffer losses on such
contracts and thereby decrease revenues.
We charter-out our vessels to other parties, who pay us a daily rate of hire. We also enter
into COAs pursuant to which we agree to carry cargoes, typically for industrial customers, who
export or import dry bulk cargoes. Additionally, we enter into FFAs, part of which are traded
over-the-counter. We also enter into spot market voyage contracts, where we are paid a rate per ton
to carry a specified cargo on a specified route. The FFAs and these contracts and arrangements
subject us to counterparty credit risks at various levels. If the counterparties fail to meet their
obligations, we could suffer losses on such contracts which could materially adversely affect our
financial condition and results of operations. In addition, after a charterer defaults on a time
charter, we would have to enter into charters at lower rates. It is also possible that we would be
unable to secure a charter at all. If we re-charter the vessel at lower rates, our financial
condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.
We have insured our charter-out contracts through a AA+ rated European Union governmental
agency. If the charterer goes into payment default, the insurance company will reimburse us for the
charter payments under the terms of the policy (subject to applicable deductibles) for the
remaining term of the charter-out contract.
On November 30, 2006, we received notification that one of our FFA trading counterparties
filed for bankruptcy in Canada. Our exposure to such counterparty was estimated to be approximately
$7.7 million. While the recovery we may obtain in any liquidation proceeding cannot be presently
estimated, based on managements current expectations and assumptions, we provided $5.4 million in
our 2006 financial statements and $0.5 million additional provision in our 2008 financial
statements. As of December 31, 2008, an amount of $1.1 million has been recovered. No further
information has developed since then which would change our expectations and assumptions either to
increase or decrease the provision. However, we do not believe that this will have a material
impact on our liquidity, or on our ability to make payments of principal and interest or otherwise
service our debt.
Disruptions in world financial markets and the resulting governmental action in the United States
and in other parts of the world could have a material adverse impact on our ability to obtain
financing required to expand our business through the acquisition of vessels or new businesses.
Furthermore, such a disruption would adversely affect our results of operations, financial
condition and cash flows, causing the market price of our common stock to decline.
The United States and other parts of the world are exhibiting deteriorating economic trends
and are currently in a recession. For example, the credit markets worldwide and in the U. S. have
experienced significant contraction, de-leveraging and reduced liquidity, and the U. S. federal
government, state governments and foreign governments have implemented and are considering a broad
variety of governmental action and/or new regulation of the financial markets. Securities and
futures markets and the credit markets are subject to comprehensive statutes, regulations and other
requirements. The Securities and Exchange Commission, other regulators, self-regulatory
organizations and exchanges are authorized to take extraordinary actions in the event of market
emergencies, and may effect changes in law or interpretations of existing laws.
Recently, a number of financial institutions have experienced serious financial difficulties
and, in some cases, have entered bankruptcy proceedings or are in regulatory enforcement actions.
The uncertainty surrounding the future of the credit markets in the U.S. and the rest of the world
has resulted in reduced access to credit worldwide. Due to the fact that we intend to cover all or
a portion of the cost of vessel acquisition with debt financing, such uncertainty, combined with
restrictions imposed by our current debt may hamper our ability to finance vessel or new business
acquisition.
We face risks attendant to changes in economic environments, changes in interest rates, and
instability in certain securities markets, among other factors. Major market disruptions and the
current adverse changes in market conditions and regulatory climate in the U.S. and worldwide may
adversely affect our business or impair our ability to borrow amounts under our existing credit
facility or any future financial arrangements. The current market conditions may last longer than
we anticipate. These recent and developing economic and governmental factors may have a material
adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition or cash flows and could cause the
price of our common stock to decline significantly.
8
We are subject to certain operating risks, including vessel breakdowns or accidents, that could
result in a loss of revenue from the affected vessels and which in turn could have an adverse
effect on our results of operations or financial condition.
Our exposure to operating risks of vessel breakdown and accidents mainly arises in the context
of our owned vessels. The rest of our core fleet is chartered-in under time charters and, as a
result, most operating risks relating to these time chartered vessels remain with their owners. If
we pay hire on a chartered-in vessel at a lower rate than the rate of hire it receives from a
sub-charterer to whom we have chartered out the vessel, a breakdown or loss of the vessel due to an
operating risk suffered by the owner will, in all likelihood, result in our loss of the positive
spread between the two rates of hire. Although we maintain insurance policies (subject to
deductibles and exclusions) to cover us against the loss of such spread through the sinking or
other loss of a chartered-in vessel, we cannot assure you that we will be covered under all
circumstances or that such policies will be available in the future on commercially reasonable
terms. Breakdowns or accidents involving our vessels and losses relating to chartered vessels which
are not covered by insurance would result in a loss of revenue from the affected vessels adversely
affecting our financial condition and results of operations.
Although we have longstanding relationships with certain Japanese ship owners who provide us access
to very competitive contracts, we cannot assure you that we will always be able to maintain such
relationships or that such contracts will continue to be available in the future.
We have longstanding relationships with certain Japanese ship owners that give us access to
time charters that are currently at favorable rates and which, in some cases, include options to
purchase the vessels at favorable prices relative to the current market. We cannot assure you that
we will have such relationships indefinitely. In addition, there is no assurance that Japanese ship
owners will generally make contracts available on the same or substantially similar terms in the
future.
Our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer holds approximately 23% of our common stock and will be
able to exert considerable influence over our actions; her failure to own a significant amount of
our common stock or to be our Chief Executive Officer would constitute a default under our secured
credit facilities.
Ms. Angeliki Frangou owns approximately 23% of the outstanding shares of our common stock, and
has filed a Schedule 13D indicating that she intends, subject to market conditions, to purchase $20
million of common stock (as of December 31, 2008, she has purchased approximately $10 million in
value of common stock). As the Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and a significant stockholder, she
has the power to exert considerable influence over our actions and the outcome of matters on which
our stockholders are entitled to vote including the election of directors and other significant
corporate actions. The interests of Ms. Frangou may be different from your interests. Furthermore,
if Ms. Frangou ceases to hold a minimum of 20% of our common stock does not remain actively
involved in the business or ceases to be our Chief Executive Officer, then we will be in default
under our secured credit facilities.
The loss of key members of our senior management team could disrupt the management of our business.
We believe that our success depends on the continued contributions of the members of our
senior management team, including Ms. Angeliki Frangou, our Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and
principal stockholder. The loss of the services of Ms. Frangou or one of our other executive
officers or senior management members could impair our ability to identify and secure new charter
contracts, to maintain good customer relations and to otherwise manage our business, which could
have a material adverse effect on our financial performance and our ability to compete.
Certain of our directors, officers, and principal stockholders are affiliated with entities engaged
in business activities similar to those conducted by us which may compete directly with us, causing
such persons to have conflicts of interest.
Some of our directors, officers and principal stockholders have affiliations with entities
that have similar business activities to those conducted by us. Certain of our directors are also
directors of other shipping companies and they may enter similar businesses in the future. These
other affiliations and business activities may give rise to certain conflicts of interest in the
course of such individuals affiliation with us. Although we do not prevent our directors, officers
and principal stockholders from having such affiliations, we use our best efforts to cause such
individuals to comply with all applicable laws and regulations in addressing such conflicts of
interest. Our officers and employee directors devote their full time and attention to our ongoing
operations, and our non-employee directors devote such time as is necessary and required to satisfy
their duties as directors of a public company.
9
A failure to pass inspection by classification societies could result in one or more vessels being
unemployable unless and until they pass inspection, resulting in a loss of revenues from such
vessels for that period and a corresponding decrease in operating cash flows.
The hull and machinery of every commercial vessel must be classed by a classification society
authorized by its country of registry. The classification society certifies that a vessel is safe
and seaworthy in accordance with the applicable rules and regulations of the country of registry of
the vessel and the United Nations Safety of Life at Sea Convention. Navios Holdings owned fleet is
currently enrolled with Lloyds Register of Shipping, Nippon Kaiji Kiokai, Korean Register of
Shipping and Bureau Veritas.
A vessel must undergo an annual survey, or Annual Survey, an intermediate survey, or
Intermediate Survey and a special survey, or Special Survey. In lieu of a Special Survey, a
vessels machinery may be on a continuous survey cycle, under which the machinery would be surveyed
periodically over a five-year period. Navios Holdings vessels are on Special Survey cycles for
hull inspection and continuous survey cycles for machinery inspection. Every vessel is also
required to be dry docked every two to three years for inspection of the underwater parts of such
vessel.
If any vessel fails any Annual Survey, Intermediate Survey, or Special Survey, the vessel may
be unable to trade between ports and, therefore, would be unemployable, potentially causing a
negative impact on Navios Holdings revenues due to the loss of revenues from such vessel until it
was able to trade again.
Capital expenditures and other costs necessary to operate and maintain our vessels may increase due
to changes in governmental regulations, safety or other equipment standards.
Changes in governmental regulations, safety or other equipment standards, as well as
compliance with standards imposed by maritime self-regulatory organizations and customer
requirements or competition, may require us to make capital and other expenditures. For example, if
governmental authorities or independent classification societies that inspect the hull and
machinery of commercial ships to assess compliance with minimum criteria as set by national and
international regulations enact new standards, we may be required to make significant expenditures
for alterations of the addition of new equipment. In order to satisfy any such requirements, we may
be required to take our vessels out of service for extended periods of time, with corresponding
losses of revenues. In the future, market conditions may not justify these expenditures or enable
us to operate our vessels, particularly older vessels, profitably during the remainder
of their economic lives. This could lead to significant asset write-downs.
The risks and costs associated with vessels increase as the vessels age.
The costs to operate and maintain a vessel in operation increase with the age of the vessel. The
average age of the vessels in our fleet is 4.7 years, and most drybulk vessels have an expected
life of approximately 25 years. In some instances, charterers prefer newer vessels that are more
fuel efficient than older vessels. Cargo insurance rates also increase with the age of a vessel,
making older vessels less desirable to charterers as well. Governmental regulations, safety or
other equipment standards related to the age of the vessels may require expenditures for
alterations or the addition of new equipment to our vessels and may restrict the type of activities
in which these vessels may engage. We cannot assure you that, as our vessels age, market conditions
will justify those expenditures or enable us to operate our vessels profitably during the remainder
of their useful lives. If we sell vessels, we may have to sell them at a loss, and if charterers no
longer charter out vessels due to their age, our earnings could be materially adversely affected.
We are subject to various laws, regulations and conventions, including environmental laws that
could require significant expenditures both to maintain compliance with such laws and to pay for
any uninsured environmental liabilities resulting from a spill or other environmental disaster.
The shipping business and vessel operation are materially affected by government regulation in
the form of international conventions, national, state and local laws, and regulations in force in
the jurisdictions in which vessels operate, as well as in the country or countries of their
registration. Because such conventions, laws and regulations are often revised, we cannot predict
the ultimate cost of complying with such conventions, laws and regulations, or the impact thereof
on the fair market price or useful life of our vessels. Changes in governmental regulations, safety
or other equipment standards, as well as compliance with standards imposed by maritime
self-regulatory organizations and customer requirements or competition, may require us to make
capital and other expenditures. In order to satisfy any such requirements, we may be required to
take any of our vessels out of service for extended periods of time, with corresponding losses of
revenues. In the future, market conditions may not justify these expenditures or enable us to
operate our vessels, particularly older vessels, profitably during the remainder of their economic
lives. This could lead to significant asset write-downs. Additional conventions, laws and
regulations may be adopted that could limit our ability to do business, require capital
expenditures or otherwise increase our cost of doing business, which may materially adversely
affect our operations, as well as the shipping industry generally. In various jurisdictions,
legislation has been enacted or is under consideration that would impose more stringent
requirements on air pollution and other ship emissions, including emissions of greenhouse gases and
ballast water discharged from vessels. We are required by various governmental and
quasi-governmental agencies to obtain certain permits, licenses and certificates with respect to
our operations.
10
The operation of vessels is also affected by the requirements set forth in the ISM Code. The
ISM Code requires ship owners and bareboat charterers to develop and maintain an extensive safety
management system that includes the adoption of a safety and environmental protection policy
setting forth instructions and procedures for safe vessel operation and describing procedures for
dealing with emergencies. Non-compliance with the ISM Code may subject such party to increased
liability, may decrease available insurance coverage for the affected vessels, and may result in a
denial of access to, or detention in, certain ports. For example, the United States Coast Guard and
European Union authorities have indicated that vessels not in compliance with the ISM Code will be
prohibited from trading in ports in the United States and European Union. Currently, each of the
vessels in our owned fleet is ISM Code-certified. However, there can be no assurance that such
certification will be maintained indefinitely.
For all vessels, including those operated under our fleet, international liability for oil
pollution is currently governed by the International Convention on Civil Liability for Bunker Oil
Pollution Damage, or the Bunker Convention, adopted by the International Maritime Organization
(IMO) in 2001. The Bunker Convention imposes strict liability on ship owners for pollution damage
in jurisdictional waters of ratifying states caused by discharges of bunker oil. The Bunker
Convention defines bunker oil as any hydrocarbon mineral oil, including lubricating oil, used or
intended to be used for the operation or propulsion of the ship, and any residues of such oil. The Bunker Convention requires
registered owners of ships over a certain size to maintain insurance for pollution damage in an
amount equal to the limits of liability under the applicable national or international limitation
regime (but not exceeding the amount calculated in accordance with the Convention on Limitation of
Liability for Maritime Claims of 1976, as amended). The Bunker Convention became effective on
November 21, 2008, and by early 2009 it was in effect in 22 states. In other jurisdictions,
liability for spills or releases of oil from ships bunkers continues to be determined by the
national or other domestic laws in the jurisdiction where the events or damages occur.
Environmental legislation in the United States merits particular mention as it is in many
respects more onerous than international laws, representing a high-water mark of regulation with
which ship owners and operators must comply, and of liability likely to be incurred in the event of
non-compliance or an incident causing pollution. Additionally, pursuant to the federal laws, each
state may enact more stringent regulations, thus subjecting ship owners to dual liability.
Notably, California has adopted regulations that parallel most, if not all of the federal
regulations explained below. We intend to comply with all applicable state regulations in the ports
where our vessels call.
U.S. federal legislation, including notably the Oil Pollution Act of 1990, or OPA 90,
establishes an extensive regulatory and liability regime for the protection and cleanup of the
environment from oil spills, including bunker oil spills from drybulk vessels as well as cargo or
bunker oil spills from tankers. OPA 90 affects all owners and operators whose vessels trade in the
United States, its territories and possessions, or whose vessels operate in United States waters,
which includes the United States territorial sea and its 200 nautical mile exclusive economic
zone. Under OPA 90, vessel owners, operators and bareboat charterers are responsible parties and
are jointly, severally and strictly liable (unless the spill results solely from the act or
omission of a third party, an act of God or an act of war) for all containment and clean-up costs
and other damages arising from discharges, or substantial threats of discharges, of oil from their
vessels. In addition to potential liability under OPA 90, vessel owners may in some instances incur
liability on an even more stringent basis under state law in the particular state where the
spillage occurred. For example, California regulates oil spills pursuant to California Government
Code section 8670 et seq. These regulations prohibit the discharge of oil, require an oil
contingency plan be filed with the state, require that the ship owner contract with an oil response
organization and require a valid certificate of financial responsibility, all prior to the vessel
entering state waters.
11
Outside of the United States, other national laws generally provide for the owner to bear
strict liability for pollution, subject to a right to limit liability under applicable national or
international regimes for limitation of liability. The most widely applicable international regime
limiting maritime pollution liability is the 1976 Convention referred to above. Rights to limit
liability under the 1976 Convention are forfeited where a spill is caused by a ship-owners
intentional or reckless conduct. Certain states have ratified the IMOs 1996 Protocol to the 1976
Convention. The Protocol provides for substantially higher the liability limits to apply in those
jurisdictions than the limits set forth in the 1976 Convention. Finally, some jurisdictions are not
a party to either the 1976 Convention or the Protocol of 1996, and, therefore, a ship owners
rights to limit liability for maritime pollution in such jurisdictions may be uncertain.
In some areas of regulation, the European Union has introduced new laws without attempting to
procure a corresponding amendment of international law. A directive on ship-source pollution was
adopted in 2005, imposing criminal sanctions for pollution not only caused by intent or
recklessness (which would be an offense under MARPOL), but also caused by serious negligence. The
directive could therefore result in criminal liability being incurred in circumstances where it
would not be otherwise incurred under international law. Experience has shown that in the emotive
atmosphere often associated with pollution incidents, the negligence alleged by prosecutors has
often been found by courts on grounds which the international maritime community has found hard to
understand. Moreover, there is skepticism that serious negligence is likely to prove any narrower
in practice than ordinary negligence. Criminal liability for a pollution incident could not only
result in us incurring substantial penalties or fines, but may also, in some jurisdictions,
facilitate civil liability claims for greater compensation than would otherwise have been payable.
We currently maintain, for each of our owned vessels, insurance coverage against pollution
liability risks in the amount of $1.0 billion per incident. The insured risks include penalties and
fines as well as civil liabilities and expenses resulting from accidental pollution. However, this
insurance coverage is subject to exclusions, deductibles and other terms and conditions. If any
liabilities or expenses fall within an exclusion from coverage, or if damages from a catastrophic
incident exceed the $1.0 billion limitation of coverage per incident, our cash flow, profitability
and financial position could be adversely impacted.
We are subject to vessel security regulations and will incur costs to comply with recently adopted
regulations and may be subject to costs to comply with similar regulations which may be adopted in
the future in response to terrorism.
Since the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, there have been a variety of initiatives
intended to enhance vessel security. On November 25, 2002, the Maritime Transportation Security Act
of 2002, or MTSA, came into effect. To implement certain portions of the MTSA, in July 2003, the
U.S. Coast Guard issued regulations requiring the implementation of certain security requirements
aboard vessels operating in waters subject to the jurisdiction of the United States. Similarly, in
December 2002, amendments to the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea, or SOLAS,
created a new chapter of the convention dealing specifically with maritime security. The new
chapter went into effect in July 2004, and imposes various detailed security obligations on vessels
and port authorities, most of which are contained in the newly created International Ship and Port
Facilities Security, or ISPS Code. Among the various requirements are:
|
|
|
on-board installation of automatic information systems, to enhance
vessel-to-vessel and vessel-to-shore communications; |
|
|
|
|
on-board installation of ship security alert systems; |
12
|
|
|
the development of vessel security plans; and |
|
|
|
|
compliance with flag state security certification requirements. |
Furthermore, additional security measures could be required in the future which could have a
significant financial impact on us. The U.S. Coast Guard regulations, intended to be aligned with
international maritime security standards, exempt non-U.S. vessels from MTSA vessel security
measures, provided such vessels have on board, a valid International Ship Security Certificate, or
ISSC, that attests to the vessels compliance with SOLAS security requirements and the ISPS Code.
We have implemented the various security measures addressed by the MTSA, SOLAS and the ISPS Code
and take measures for our vessels to attain compliance with all applicable security requirements
within the prescribed time periods. Although management does not believe these additional
requirements will have a material financial impact on our operations, there can be no assurance
that there will not be an interruption in operations to bring vessels into compliance with the
applicable requirements and any such interruption, could cause a decrease in charter revenues.
The
operation of our ocean-going vessels and the Navios Logistics
fleet entails the possibility of marine disasters including damage
or destruction of the vessel due to accident, the loss of a vessel due to piracy or terrorism,
damage or destruction of cargo and similar events that may cause a loss of revenue from affected
vessels and could damage our business reputation, which may in turn lead to loss of business.
The
operation of our ocean-going vessels and the Navios Logistics
fleet entails certain inherent risks that may adversely affect
our business and reputation, including:
|
|
|
damage or destruction of a vessel due to marine disaster such as a collision; |
|
|
|
|
the loss of a vessel due to piracy and terrorism; |
|
|
|
|
cargo and property losses or damage as a result of the foregoing or less
drastic causes such as human error, mechanical failure and bad weather; |
|
|
|
|
environmental accidents as a result of the foregoing; and |
|
|
|
|
business interruptions and delivery delays caused by mechanical failure,
human error, war, terrorism, political action in various countries, labor
strikes or adverse weather conditions. |
Any of these circumstances or events could substantially increase our costs. For example, the
costs of replacing a vessel or cleaning up a spill could substantially lower its revenues by taking
vessels out of operation permanently or for periods of time. The involvement of our vessels in a
disaster or delays in delivery or damages or loss of cargo may harm our reputation as a safe and
reliable vessel operator and could cause us to lose business.
Acts of piracy on ocean-going vessels have increased recently in frequency and magnitude, which
could adversely affect our business.
The shipping industry has historically been affected by acts of piracy in regions such as the
South China Sea and the Gulf of Aden. In 2008, acts of piracy saw a steep rise, particularly off
the coast of Somalia in the Gulf of Aden. One of the most significant examples of the increase in
piracy came in November 2008 when the M/V Sirius Star, a crude oil tanker which was not affiliated
with us, was captured by pirates in the Indian Ocean while carrying crude oil estimated to be worth
approximately $100 million. If these piracy attacks result in regions (in which our vessels are
deployed) being characterized by insurers as war risk zones or war and strikes listed areas,
premiums payable for such insurance coverage could increase significantly and such insurance
coverage may be more difficult to obtain. Crew costs, including those due to employing onboard
security guards, could increase in such circumstances. In addition, while we believe the charterer
remains liable for charter payments when a vessel is seized by pirates, the charterer may dispute
this and withhold charter hire until the vessel is released. A charterer may also claim that a
vessel seized by pirates was not on-hire for a certain number of days and it is therefore
entitled to cancel the charter party, a claim that we would dispute. We may not be adequately
insured to cover losses from these incidents, which could have a material adverse effect on us. In
addition, detention hijacking as a result of an act of piracy against our vessels, or an increase
in cost, or unavailability of insurance for our vessels, could have a material adverse impact on
our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Accidents
or operational disruptions in connection with loading, discharging or
transiting the rivers in our Navios Logistics business could
adversely affect our operations and revenues.
Our
Navios Logistics business is dependent, in part, upon being able to
timely and effectively transit the rivers and load and discharge
cargoes. Any accidents or operational disruptions to ports,
terminals, bridges or the lock on the high Parana River could
adversely affect our operations and our revenues in our Navios
Logistics business.
Any
drought or significant decline in production of soybeans or other
agricultural products in the Hidrovia region, or any significant
change affecting the navigability of certain rivers in the region,
would have an adverse effect on our Navios Logistics business.
A
significant portion of our Navios Logistics business is derived from
transportation of soybeans and other agricultural products produced
in the Hidrovia region. Any drought or other adverse weather
conditions, such as floods, could result in a decline in production
of these products which would likely result in a reduction in demand
for our services. This would, in turn, negatively impact our results
of operations and financial condition. Further, most of the
operations in our Navios Logistics business occur on the Parana and
Paraguay Rivers, and any changes adversely affecting navigability of
either of these rivers, such as changes in the depth of the water or
the width of the navigable channel, could, in the short term, reduce
or limit our ability to effectively transport cargo on the rivers.
A
prolonged drought or other turn of events that is perceived by
the market to have an impact on the region, the navigability of the
Parana or Paraguay Rivers or our Navios Logistics business in general
may, in the short term, result in a reduction in the market value of
the barges and push boats that we operate in the region. These barges
and push boats are designed to operate in wide and relatively calm
rivers, of which there are only a few in the world. If it becomes
difficult or impossible to operate profitably our barges and push
boats in the Hidrovia region and we are forced to sell them to a
third party located outside of the region, there is a limited market
in which we would be able to sell these vessels, and accordingly we
may be forced to sell them at a substantial loss.
13
As we expand our business, we may have difficulty managing our growth, which could increase
expenses.
We have significantly grown our fleet and business since August 2005. We intend to continue
seeking growth in our fleet, either through purchases of additional vessels, through chartered-in
vessels or through business acquisitions. The addition of vessels to our fleet or the acquisition
of new business will impose significant additional responsibilities on our management and staff,
and may require us to increase the number of our personnel. We will also have to increase our
customer base to provide continued employment for the new vessels. Our growth will depend on:
|
|
|
locating and acquiring suitable vessels; |
|
|
|
|
identifying and consummating acquisitions or joint ventures; |
|
|
|
|
integrating any acquired business successfully with our existing operations; |
|
|
|
|
enhancing our customer base; |
|
|
|
|
managing our expansion; and |
|
|
|
|
obtaining required financing. |
Growing any business by acquisition presents numerous risks such as undisclosed liabilities
and obligations, difficulty in obtaining additional qualified personnel, and managing relationships
with customers and suppliers and integrating newly acquired operations into existing
infrastructures. We cannot give any assurance that we will be successful in executing our growth
plans or that we will not incur significant expenses and losses in connection therewith or that our
acquisitions will perform as expected, which would adversely affect our results of operations and
financial condition.
As we expand our business, we will need to improve our operations and financial systems, staff, and
crew; if we cannot improve these systems or recruit suitable employees, we may not effectively
control our operations.
Our initial operating and financial systems may not be adequate as we implement our plan to
expand, and our attempts to improve these systems may be ineffective. If we are unable to operate
our financial and operations systems effectively or to recruit suitable employees as we expand our
operations, we may be unable to effectively control and manage the substantially larger operation.
Although it is impossible to predict what errors might occur as the result of inadequate controls,
it is the case that it is harder to oversee a sizable operation than a small one and, accordingly,
more likely that errors will occur as operations grow and that additional management infrastructure
and systems will be required in connection with such growth to attempt to avoid such errors.
Vessels may suffer damage and we may face unexpected dry docking costs, which could affect our cash
flow and financial condition.
If our owned vessels suffer damage, they may need to be repaired at a dry docking facility.
The costs of dry dock repairs are unpredictable and can be substantial. We may have to pay dry
docking costs that insurance does not cover. The loss of earnings while these vessels are being
repaired and repositioned, as well as the actual cost of these repairs, could decrease our revenues
and earnings substantially, particularly if a number of vessels are damaged or dry docked at the
same time.
The shipping industry has inherent operational risks that may not be adequately covered by our
insurance.
The operation of ocean-going vessels in international trade is inherently risky. Although we
carry insurance for our fleet covering risks commonly insured against by vessel owners and
operators, such as hull and machinery insurance, war risks insurance and protection and indemnity
insurance (which include environmental damage and pollution insurance), all risks may not be
adequately insured against, and any particular claim may not be paid. We do not currently maintain
off-hire insurance, which would cover the loss of revenue during extended vessel off-hire periods,
such as those that occur during an unscheduled dry docking due to damage to the vessel from
accidents. Accordingly, any extended vessel off-hire, due to an accident or otherwise, could have a
material adverse effect on our business. Any claims covered by insurance would be subject to
deductibles, and since it is possible that a large number of claims may be brought, the aggregate
amount of these deductibles could be material.
14
We may be unable to procure adequate insurance coverage at commercially reasonable rates in
the future. For example, more stringent environmental regulations have led in the past to increased
costs for, and in the future may result in the lack of availability of, insurance against risks of
environmental damage or pollution. A catastrophic oil spill or marine disaster could exceed our
insurance coverage, which could harm our business, financial condition and operating results.
Changes in the insurance markets attributable to terrorist attacks may also make certain types of
insurance more difficult for us to obtain. In addition, the insurance that may be available to us
in the future may be significantly more expensive than our existing coverage.
Even if our insurance coverage is adequate to cover our losses, we may not be able to timely
obtain a replacement vessel in the event of a loss. Furthermore, in the future, we may not be able
to obtain adequate insurance coverage at reasonable rates for our fleet. Our insurance policies
also contain deductibles, limitations and exclusions which can result in significant increased
overall costs to us.
Because we obtain some of our insurance through protection and indemnity associations, we may also
be subject to calls, or premiums, in amounts based not only on our own claim records, but also on
the claim records of all other members of the protection and indemnity associations.
We may be subject to calls, or premiums, in amounts based not only on our claim records but
also on the claim records of all other members of the protection and indemnity associations through
which we receive insurance coverage for tort liability, including pollution-related liability. Our
payment of these calls could result in significant expenses to us, which could have a material adverse effect on our
business, results of operations and financial condition and our ability to pay interest on, or the
principal of, the senior notes.
Because we generate all of our revenues in U.S. dollars but incur a portion of our expenses in
other currencies, exchange rate fluctuations could cause us to suffer exchange rate losses, thereby
increasing expenses and reducing income.
We engage in worldwide commerce with a variety of entities. Although our operations may expose
us to certain levels of foreign currency risk, our transactions are predominantly U.S. dollar
denominated at the present. Additionally, our South American subsidiaries transact a nominal amount
of their operations in Uruguayan pesos, Paraguayan Guaranies and Argentinean pesos, whereas our
wholly-owned vessel subsidiaries and the vessel management subsidiary transact a nominal amount of
their operations in Euros; however, all of the subsidiaries primary cash flows are U.S. dollar
denominated. In 2008 approximately 6.9% of our expenses were incurred in currencies other than U.S.
dollars. Transactions in currencies other than the functional currency are translated at the
exchange rate in effect at the date of each transaction. Expenses incurred in foreign currencies
against which the U.S. dollar falls in value can increase, thereby decreasing our income. For
example, for the year ended December 31, 2008, the value of the U.S. dollar increased by
approximately 4.9% as compared to the Euro. A greater percentage of our transactions and expenses
in the future may be denominated in currencies other than U.S. dollar. As part of our overall risk
management policy, we attempt to hedge these risks in exchange rate fluctuations from time to time.
We may not always be successful in such hedging activities and, as a result, our operating results
could suffer as a result of non-hedged losses incurred as a result of exchange rate fluctuations.
Our operations expose us to global political risks, such as wars and political instability that may
interfere with the operation of our vessels and thereby cause a decrease in revenues from such
vessels.
We are an international company and primarily conduct our operations outside the United
States. Changing economic, political and governmental conditions in the countries where we are
engaged in business or where our vessels are registered will affect us. In the past, political
conflicts, particularly in the Persian Gulf, resulted in attacks on vessels, mining of waterways
and other efforts to disrupt shipping in the area. For example, in October 2002, the vessel
Limburg, which was not affiliated with us, was attacked by terrorists in Yemen. Acts of terrorism
and piracy have also affected vessels trading in regions such as the South China Sea. Following the
terrorist attack in New York City on September 11, 2001, and the military response of the United
States, the likelihood of future acts of terrorism may increase, and our vessels may face higher
risks of being attacked in the Middle East region and interruption of operations causing a decrease
in revenues. In addition, future hostilities or other political instability in regions where our
vessels trade could affect our trade patterns and adversely affect our operations by causing delays
in shipping on certain routes or making shipping impossible on such routes, thereby causing a
decrease in revenues.
15
A government could requisition title or seize our vessels during a war or national emergency.
Requisition of title occurs when a government takes a vessel and becomes its owner. A government
could also requisition our vessels for hire, which would result in the government taking control of
a vessel and effectively becoming the charterer at a dictated charter rate. Requisition of one or
more of our vessels would have a substantial negative effect on us as we would potentially lose all
revenues and earnings from the requisitioned vessels and permanently lose the vessels. Such losses
might be partially offset if the requisitioning government compensated us for the requisition.
Maritime claimants could arrest our vessels, which could interrupt our cash flow.
Crew members, suppliers of goods and services to a vessel, shippers of cargo, and other
parties may be entitled to a maritime lien against a vessel for unsatisfied debts, claims or
damages against such vessel. In many jurisdictions, a maritime lien holder may enforce its lien by
arresting a vessel through foreclosure proceedings. The arrest or attachment of one or more of our
vessels could interrupt our cash flow and require us to pay large sums of funds to have the arrest
lifted. We are not currently aware of the existence of any such maritime lien on our vessels.
In addition, in some jurisdictions, such as South Africa, under the sister ship theory of
liability, a claimant may arrest both the vessel which is subject to the claimants maritime lien
and any associated vessel, which is any vessel owned or controlled by the same owner. Claimants
could try to assert sister ship liability against one vessel in our fleet for claims relating
to another ship in the fleet.
Risks Relating to Our Debt
We have substantial debt which could adversely affect our financial health and our ability to
obtain financing in the future, react to changes in our business and make payments on the notes.
As of December 31, 2008, we had $887.7 million in aggregate principal amount of debt
outstanding of which $587.7 was secured. We also have up to $132.3 million available to us to be
used for general corporate purposes under our existing and new credit facilities following the term
loan facility of up to $110.0 million concluded in March 2009. We may increase the amount of our
indebtedness in the future which would further exacerbate the risks listed below.
Our substantial debt could have important consequences to holders of our common stock. Because
of our substantial debt:
|
|
|
our ability to obtain additional financing for working capital, capital expenditures, debt
service requirements, vessel or other acquisitions or general corporate purposes and our
ability to satisfy our obligations with respect to our debt may be impaired in the future; |
|
|
|
|
a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations must be dedicated to the payment of
principal and interest on our indebtedness, thereby reducing the funds available to us for
other purposes; |
|
|
|
|
we will be exposed to the risk of increased interest rates because our borrowings under our
senior secured credit facility will be at variable rates of interest; |
|
|
|
|
it may be more difficult for us to satisfy our obligations to our lenders, resulting in
possible defaults on and acceleration of such indebtedness; |
|
|
|
|
we may be more vulnerable to general adverse economic and industry conditions; |
|
|
|
|
we may be at a competitive disadvantage compared to our competitors with less debt or
comparable debt at more favorable interest rates and, as a result, we may not be better
positioned to withstand economic downturns; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to refinance indebtedness may be limited or the associated costs may increase; and |
16
|
|
|
our flexibility to adjust to changing market conditions and ability to
withstand competitive pressures could be limited, or we may be
prevented from carrying out capital expenditures that are necessary or
important to our growth strategy and efforts to improve operating
margins or our business. |
Despite our current indebtedness levels, we and our subsidiaries may be able to incur substantially
more debt, including secured debt. This could further exacerbate the risks associated with our
substantial indebtedness.
We and our subsidiaries may be able to incur substantial additional indebtedness in the future
as the terms of the indenture governing our 9.5% senior notes due 2014, or the senior notes, do
not fully prohibit us or our subsidiaries from doing so. If new debt is added to our current debt
levels, the related risks that we now face would increase and we may not be able to meet all of our
debt obligations, including the repayment of the senior notes.
The agreements and instruments governing our debt will contain restrictions and limitations that
could significantly impact our ability to operate our business.
Our secured credit facilities and our indenture impose certain operating and financial
restrictions on us. These restrictions may limit our ability to:
|
|
|
incur or guarantee additional indebtedness; |
|
|
|
|
create liens on our assets; |
|
|
|
|
make new investments; |
|
|
|
|
engage in mergers and acquisitions; |
|
|
|
|
pay dividends or redeem capital stock; |
|
|
|
|
make capital expenditures; |
|
|
|
|
engage in certain FFA trading activities; |
|
|
|
|
change the flag, class or commercial and technical management of our vessels; |
|
|
|
|
enter into long term charter arrangements without the consent of the lender; and |
|
|
|
|
sell any of our vessels. |
Therefore, we will need to seek permission from our lenders in order to engage in some
corporate and commercial actions that we believe would be in the best interest of our business, and
a denial of permission may make it difficult for us to successfully execute our business strategy
or effectively compete with companies that are not similarly restricted. Our lenders interests may
be different from our interests or those of our holders of common stock, and we cannot guarantee
that we will be able to obtain our lenders permission when needed. This may prevent us from taking
actions that are in our or our stockholders best interests. Any future credit agreements may
include similar or more restrictive restrictions.
Our ability to generate the significant amount of cash needed to pay interest and principal and
otherwise service our debt and our ability to refinance all or a portion of our indebtedness or
obtain additional financing depend on multiple factors, many of which may be beyond our control.
Our ability to make scheduled payments on or to refinance our obligations under our debt will
depend on our financial and operating performance, which, in turn, will be subject to prevailing
economic and competitive conditions and to the financial and business factors, many of which may be
beyond our control.
We will use cash to pay the principal and interest on our debt. These payments limit funds
otherwise available for working capital, capital expenditures, vessel acquisitions and other
purposes. As a result of these obligations, our current liabilities may exceed our current assets.
We may need to take on additional debt as we expand our fleet, which could increase our ratio of
debt to equity. The need to service our debt may limit funds available for other purposes, and our
inability to service debt in the future could lead to acceleration of our debt and foreclosure on our owned vessels.
17
We may be unable to raise funds necessary to finance the change of control repurchase offer
required by the indenture governing our outstanding notes and our secured credit facilities.
The indenture governing the senior notes and our secured credit facilities contain certain change
of control provisions. If we experience specified changes of control under the senior notes, we
will be required to make an offer to repurchase all of our outstanding notes (unless otherwise
redeemed) at a price equal to 101% of the principal amount thereof plus accrued and unpaid
interest, if any, to the repurchase date. The occurrence of specified events that would constitute
a change of control will constitute a default under our secured credit facilities. In the event of
a change of control, we cannot assure you that we would have sufficient assets to satisfy all of
our obligations under our secured credit facilities and the senior notes, including but not limited
to repaying all indebtedness outstanding under our secured credit facilities or repurchasing the
senior notes.
An increase in interest rates would increase the cost of servicing our debt and could reduce our
profitability.
The debt under our secured credit facilities bears interest at variable rates. We may also
incur indebtedness in the future with variable interest rates. As a result, an increase in market
interest rates would increase the cost of servicing our debt and could materially reduce our
profitability and cash flows. The impact of such an increase would be more significant for us than
it would be for some other companies because of our substantial debt.
The market values of our vessels, which have declined from historically high levels, may fluctuate
significantly, which could cause us to breach covenants in our credit facilities and result in the
foreclosure of our mortgaged vessels.
Factors that influence vessel values include:
|
|
|
number of newbuilding deliveries; |
|
|
|
|
changes in environmental and other regulations that may limit the useful life of vessels; |
|
|
|
|
changes in global dry bulk commodity supply; |
|
|
|
|
types and sizes of vessels; |
|
|
|
|
development of and increase in use of other modes of transportation; |
|
|
|
|
cost of vessel acquisitions; |
|
|
|
|
cost of newbuilding vessels; |
|
|
|
|
governmental or other regulations; |
|
|
|
|
prevailing level of charter rates; and |
|
|
|
|
general economic and market conditions affecting the shipping industry. |
If the market values of our owned vessels decrease, we may breach covenants contained in our
secured credit facilities. If we breach such covenants and are unable to remedy any relevant
breach, our lenders could accelerate our debt and foreclose on the collateral, including our
vessels. Any loss of vessels would significantly decrease our ability to generate positive cash
flow from operations and, therefore, service our debt. In addition, if the book value of a vessel
is impaired due to unfavorable market conditions, or a vessel is sold at a price below its book
value, we would incur a loss.
We may require additional financing to acquire vessels or business or to exercise vessel purchase
options, and such financing may not be available.
In the future, we may be required to make substantial cash outlays to exercise options or to
acquire vessels or business and will need additional financing to cover all or a portion of the
purchase prices. We intend to cover the cost of such items with new debt collateralized by the
vessels to be acquired, if applicable, but there can be no assurance that we will generate
sufficient cash or that debt financing will be available. Moreover, the covenants in our senior
secured credit facility, the indenture or other debt, may make it more difficult to obtain such
financing by imposing restrictions on what we can offer as collateral.
18
We are incorporated in the Republic of the Marshall Islands, which does not have a well-developed
body of corporate law.
Our corporate affairs are governed by our amended and restated articles of incorporation and
by-laws and by the Marshall Islands Business Corporations Act, or BCA. The provisions of the BCA
are intended to resemble provisions of the corporation laws of a number of states in the United
States. However, there have been few judicial cases in the Republic of the Marshall Islands
interpreting the BCA. The rights and fiduciary responsibilities of directors under the law of the
Republic of the Marshall Islands are not as clearly established as the rights and fiduciary
responsibilities of directors under statutes or judicial precedent in existence in certain U.S.
jurisdictions. Stockholder rights may differ as well. The BCA does specifically incorporate the
non-statutory law, or judicial case law, of the State of Delaware and other states with
substantially similar legislative provisions. Accordingly, you may have more difficulty protecting
your interests in the face of actions by management, directors or controlling stockholders than you
would in the case of a corporation incorporated in the State of Delaware or other U.S.
jurisdictions.
We, and certain of our officers and directors, may be difficult to serve with process as we are
incorporated in the Republic of the Marshall Islands and such persons may reside outside of the
United States.
We are a corporation organized under the laws of the Republic of the Marshall Islands. Several
of our directors and officers are residents of Greece or other non-U.S. jurisdictions. Substantial
portions of the assets of these persons are located in Greece or other non-U.S. jurisdictions.
Thus, it may not be possible for investors to affect service of process upon us, or our non-U.S.
directors or officers, or to enforce any judgment obtained against these persons in U.S. courts.
Also, it may not be possible to enforce U.S. securities laws or judgments obtained in U.S. courts
against these persons in a non-U.S. jurisdiction.
Being a foreign private issuer exempts us from certain Securities and Exchange Commission
requirements.
We are a foreign private issuer within the meaning of rules promulgated under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, or the Exchange Act. As such, we are exempt from certain provisions
applicable to United States public companies including:
|
|
|
the rules under the Exchange Act requiring the filing with the SEC of
quarterly reports on Form 10-Q or current reports on Form 8-K; |
|
|
|
|
the sections of the Exchange Act regulating the solicitation of
proxies, consents or authorizations in respect of a security
registered under the Exchange Act; |
|
|
|
|
the provisions of Regulation FD aimed at preventing issuers from
making selective disclosures of material information; and |
|
|
|
|
the sections of the Exchange Act requiring insiders to file public
reports of their stock ownership and trading activities and
establishing insider liability for profits realized from any
short-swing trading transaction (i.e., a purchase and sale, or
sale and purchase, of the issuers equity securities within less than
six months). |
Because of these exemptions, investors are not afforded the same protections or information
generally available to investors holding shares in public companies organized in the United States.
We may earn United States source income that is subject to tax, thereby adversely affecting our
results of operations and cash flows.
Under the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, or the Code, 50% of gross income attributable to
shipping transportation that begins or ends, but that does not both begin and end, in the United
States is characterized as U.S. source shipping income. Such income generally will be subject to a
4% U.S. federal income tax without allowance for deduction, unless we qualify for an exemption from
such tax under section 883 of the Code. Based on our current plans, we expect that our income from
sources within the United States will be international shipping income that qualifies for exemption
from United States federal income taxation under section 883 of the Code, and that we will have no
other income
19
that will be taxed in the United States. Our ability to qualify for the exemption at any given
time will depend upon circumstances related to the ownership of our common stock at such time and
thus are beyond our control. Accordingly, we can give no assurance that we would qualify for the
exemption under Section 883 with respect to any such income we earn. If Navios Holdings
vessel-owning subsidiaries were not entitled to the benefit of section 883 of the Code, they would
be subject to United States taxation on a portion of their income. As a result, depending on the
trading patterns of our vessels, we could become liable for tax, and our net income and cash flow
could be adversely affected.
We may be taxed as a United States corporation.
The purchase by International Shipping Enterprises Inc. (ISE), our predecessor, of all of
the outstanding shares of common stock of Navios Holdings, and the subsequent downstream merger of
ISE with and into Navios Holdings took place on August 25, 2005. Navios Holdings is incorporated
under the laws of the Republic of the Marshall Islands. ISE received an opinion from its counsel
for the merger transaction that, while there is no direct authority that governs the tax treatment
of the transaction, it was more likely than not that Navios Holdings would be taxed by the United
States as a foreign corporation. Accordingly, we take the position that we will be taxed as a
foreign corporation by the United States. If Navios Holdings is taxed as a U.S. corporation in the
future, its taxes will be significantly higher than they are currently.
Item 4. Information on the Company
A. History and Development of the Company
The Companys office and principal place of business is located at 85 Akti Miaouli Street,
Piraeus, Greece 185 38, and its telephone number is (011) +30-210-4595000. The Company is
incorporated under the laws of the Republic of the Marshall Islands. Trust Company of the Marshall
Islands, Inc. serves as the Companys agent for service of process, and the Companys registered
address and telephone number, as well as address and telephone number of its agent for service of
process, is Trust Company Complex, Ajeltake Island P.O. Box 1405, Majuro, Marshall Islands MH96960.
On August 25, 2005, pursuant to a Stock Purchase Agreement dated February 28, 2005, as
amended, by and among ISE, Navios Holdings and all the stockholders of Navios Holdings, ISE
acquired Navios Holdings through the purchase of all of the outstanding shares of its common stock.
As a result of this acquisition, Navios Holdings became a wholly-owned subsidiary of ISE. In
addition, on August 25, 2005, simultaneously with the acquisition of Navios Holdings, ISE effected
a reincorporation from the State of Delaware to the Republic of the Marshall Islands through a
downstream merger with and into its newly acquired wholly-owned subsidiary, whose name was and
continued to be Navios Maritime Holdings Inc. As a result of the reincorporation, ISE transitioned
from a shell company to an operating business, and the operations of Navios Holdings became those
of a publicly-traded company. The Company publicly files its reports with the Securities and
Exchange Commission under the rules of Foreign Private Issuers.
On February 2, 2007, Navios Holdings acquired all of the outstanding share capital of Kleimar
N.V. (Kleimar) for a cash consideration of $165.6 million (excluding direct acquisition costs),
subject to certain adjustments. The purchase of Kleimar was financed by existing cash and the use
of $120.0 million revolving credit facility with HSH Nordbank AG and Commerzbank AG. Kleimar is a
Belgian maritime transportation company established in 1993. Kleimar is the owner and operator of
Capesize and Panamax vessels used in the transportation of cargoes. It also had and continues to
have an extensive contract of affreightment (COA) business, a large percentage of which involves
transporting cargo to China.
Following the acquisition of Kleimar, the Company now operates a fleet of owned Capesize,
Panamax and Ultra Handymax vessels and a fleet of time chartered Capesize, Panamax and Ultra
Handymax vessels that are employed to provide worldwide transportation of bulk commodities. The
Company actively engages in assessing risk associated with fluctuating future freight rates, fuel
prices and foreign exchange and, where appropriate, will actively hedge identified economic risk
with appropriate derivative instruments. Such economic hedges do not always qualify for accounting
hedge treatment, and, as such, the usage of such derivatives could lead to material fluctuations in
the Companys reported results from operations on a period-to-period basis.
20
On August 7, 2007, Navios Holdings formed Navios Partners under the laws of Marshall Islands.
Navios GP L.L.C. (the General Partner), a wholly owned subsidiary of Navios Holdings, was also
formed on that date to act as the general partner of Navios Partners and received a 2% general
partner interest.
In connection with the initial public offering, or an IPO, of Navios Partners, on November 16,
2007, Navios Holdings sold the interests of five of its wholly-owned subsidiaries, each of which
owned a Panamax drybulk carrier, as well as interests of three of its wholly-owned subsidiaries
that operated and had options to purchase three additional vessels in exchange for: (a) all of the
net proceeds from the sale of an aggregate of 10,500,000 common units in the IPO and to a
corporation owned by Navios Partners Chairman and CEO for a total amount of $193.3 million, plus;
(b) $160.0 million of the $165.0 million borrowings under Navios Partners new revolving credit
facility; (c) 7,621,843 subordinated units issued to Navios Holdings; and (d) 2% general partner
interest and all incentive distribution rights in Navios Partners to the General Partner. Upon the
closing of the IPO, Navios Holdings owned a 43.2% interest in Navios Partners, including the 2%
general partner interest.
On or prior to the closing of the IPO, Navios Holdings entered into the following agreements
with Navios Partners: (a) a share purchase agreement pursuant to which Navios Holdings sold the
capital stock of a subsidiary that will own the Capesize vessel Navios TBN I and related time
charter, upon delivery of the vessel in June 2009; (b) a share purchase agreement pursuant to which
Navios Partners has the option, exercisable at any time between January 1, 2009 and April 1, 2009,
to acquire the capital stock of the subsidiary that will own the Capesize vessel Navios TBN II and
related time charter scheduled for delivery in October 2009; (c) a management agreement with Navios
Partners pursuant to which Navios ShipManagement Inc. (the Manager), a wholly-owned subsidiary
of Navios Holdings, provides Navios Partners commercial and technical management services; (d) an
administrative services agreement with the Manager pursuant to which the Manager provides Navios
Partners administrative services; and (e) an omnibus agreement with Navios Partners, governing,
among other things, when Navios Partners and Navios Holdings may compete against each other as well
as rights of first offer on certain drybulk carriers.
On July 1, 2008, Navios Holdings sold the Navios Aurora I, a 75,397 dwt Panamax vessel built
in 2005, to Navios Partners in exchange for approximately $79.9 million, consisting of $35.0
million cash and 3,131,415 common units of Navios Partners. The number of the common units issued
was calculated using the $14.3705 volume weighted average trading price for the 10 business days
immediately prior to the closing date. Following the sale of Navios Aurora I, Navios Holdings
currently owns a 51.6% interest in Navios Partners which includes a 2% general partner interest.
On April 1, 2009, Navios Partners board of directors decided not to exercise the option to
acquire the capital stock of the subsidiary that will own the Capesize vessel Navios TBN II due to
unfavorable conditions in the capital markets.
Navios Partners is engaged in the seaborne transportation services of a wide range of drybulk
commodities including iron ore, coal, grain and fertilizer, chartering its vessels under medium to
long term charters. The operations of Navios Partners are managed by the Manager from its offices
in Piraeus, Greece.
On January 1, 2008, pursuant to a share purchase agreement, Navios Holdings contributed: (a)
$112.2 million in cash; and (b) the authorized capital stock of its wholly-owned subsidiary,
Corporacion Navios Sociedad Anonima (CNSA) in exchange for the issuance and delivery of 12,765
shares of Navios South American Logistics Inc. (Navios Logistics), representing 63.8% (67.2%
excluding contingent consideration) of Navios Logistics outstanding stock. Navios Logistics
acquired all ownership interests in Horamar Group (Horamar) in exchange for; (a) $112.2 million
in cash (financed entirely by existing cash), of which $5.0 million were kept in escrow payable
upon the attainment of certain EBITDA targets during specified periods through December 2008 (the
EBITDA Adjustment); and (b) the issuance of 7,235 shares of Navios Logistics representing 36.2%
(32.8% excluding contingent consideration) of Navios Logistics outstanding stock, of which 1,007
shares were kept in escrow pending the EBITDA Adjustment.
In November 2008, part of the contingent consideration for the acquisition of Horamar was
released, as Horamar achieved the interim EBITDA target, at which time $2.5 million in cash and 503
shares were released to the shareholders of Horamar. Following this
release, Navios Holdings owns 65.5% (excluding 504 shares still kept in escrow at December 31, 2008, pending achievement of
final EBITDA target) of the outstanding common stock of Navios Logistics. In accordance with the
amended share purchase agreement, the final EBITDA target may be resolved until June 30, 2009.
21
Horamar was a privately held Argentina-based group that specializes in the transportation and
storage of liquid cargoes and the transportation of dry bulk cargoes in South America.
On July 1, 2008, Navios Holdings completed the IPO of units in its subsidiary, Navios Maritime
Acquisition Corporation (Navios Acquisition), a blank check company. In the offering, Navios
Acquisition sold 25,300,000 units for an aggregate purchase price of $253.0 million. Simultaneously
with the completion of the IPO, Navios Holdings purchased private placement warrants of Navios
Acquisition for an aggregate purchase price of $7.6 million (Private Placement Warrants). Prior
to the IPO, Navios Holdings had purchased 8,625,000 units of Navios Acquisition (Sponsor Units)
for a total consideration of $25,000, of which an aggregate of 290,000 units were transferred to
the Companys officers and directors and an aggregate of 2,300,000 Sponsor Units were returned to
Navios Acquisition and cancelled upon receipt. Each unit consists of one share of Navios
Acquisitions common stock and one warrant (Sponsor Warrants, together with the Private
Placement Warrants, the Navios Acquisition Warrants). Currently, Navios Holdings owns
approximately 6,035,000 shares (19%) of the outstanding common stock of Navios Acquisition.
To the knowledge of the management of the Company, there have been no indications of any
public takeover offers by third parties in respect of its shares or by the Company in respect of
other companies shares during the fiscal years 2007, 2008 and thus far in 2009.
For information concerning the Companys capital expenditures and methods of financing, see
Operating and Financial Review and Prospects.
B. Business overview
Introduction
Navios Holdings is a global, vertically integrated seaborne shipping and logistics company
focused on the transport and transshipment of drybulk commodities including iron ore, coal and
grain. For over 50 years, Navios Holdings has had an in-house technical ship management expertise
that has worked with producers of raw materials, agricultural traders and exporters, industrial
end-users, ship owners, and charterers. Navios Holdings current core fleet (excluding Navios
Logistics), the average age of which is approximately 4.7 years, consists of a total of 53 vessels,
aggregating approximately 5.1 million deadweight tons, or dwt. Navios Holdings owns 12 modern Ultra
Handymax (50,000-59,000 dwt), five Panamax (70,000-83,000 dwt), and one Product Handysize
(10,000-30,000 dwt) tanker vessels. It also time charters in and operates a fleet of six Ultra
Handymax, two Handysize, 11 Panamax, and nine Capesize vessels under long term time charters, 18 of
which are currently in operation, with the remaining 10 scheduled for delivery on various dates up
to August 2013. Navios Holdings has options to acquire 12 of the 28 time chartered-in vessels (two
of which Navios Holdings holds an initial 50% purchase option). Navios Holdings also has committed
to acquire seven newbuild Capesize vessels which are scheduled for delivery during 2009.
Navios Holdings also offers commercial and technical management services to Navios Partners
fleet which is comprised of six Panamax vessels and one Capesize vessel and receives a fixed daily
fee of $4,000 per owned Panamax and $5,000 per owned Capesize vessel until November 15, 2009. From
November 2009 to November 2012, Navios Partners is expected to reimburse Navios Holdings for all of
the actual operating costs and expenses it incurred in connection with the management of Navios
Partners fleet.
Navios Logistics owns and operates vessels, barges and push boats located mainly in Argentina,
the largest bulk transfer and storage port facility in Uruguay, and an upriver liquid port facility
located in Paraguay.
Navios Holdings strategy and business model involves the following:
22
|
|
|
Operation of a high quality, modern fleet. Navios Holdings owns and
charters in a modern, high quality fleet, having an average age of
approximately 4.7 years that provides numerous operational advantages
including more efficient cargo operations, lower insurance and vessel
maintenance costs, higher levels of fleet productivity, and an
efficient operating cost structure. |
|
|
|
|
Pursue an appropriate balance between vessel ownership and a long term
chartered-in fleet. Navios Holdings controls, through a
combination of vessel ownership and long term time chartered vessels,
approximately 5.1 million dwt in dry bulk tonnage, making Navios
Holdings one of the largest independent dry bulk operators in the
world. Navios Holdings ability, through its longstanding
relationships with various shipyards and trading houses, to charter-in
vessels at favorable rates allows it to control additional shipping
capacity without the capital expenditures required by new vessel
acquisition. In addition, having purchase options on 12 of the 28 time
chartered vessels (including those to be delivered) permits Navios
Holdings to determine when is the most commercially opportune time to
own or charter-in vessels. Navios Holdings intends to monitor
developments in the sales and purchase market to maintain the
appropriate balance between owned and long term time chartered
vessels. |
|
|
|
|
Capitalize on Navios Holdings established reputation. Navios
Holdings believes its reputation and commercial relationships enable
it to obtain favorable long term time charters, enter into the freight
market and increase its short term tonnage capacity to complement the
capacity of its core fleet, as well as to obtain access to cargo
freight opportunities through COA arrangements not readily available
to other industry participants. This reputation has also enabled
Navios Holdings to obtain favorable vessel acquisition terms as
reflected in the purchase options contained in many of its long term
charters, which are superior to the prevailing purchase prices in the
open vessel sale and purchase market. |
|
|
|
|
Utilize industry expertise to take advantage of market volatility.
The dry bulk shipping market is cyclical and volatile. Navios Holdings
uses its experience in the industry, sensitivity to trends, and
knowledge and expertise as to risk management and FFAs to hedge
against, and in some cases, to generate profit from, such volatility. |
|
|
|
|
Maintain high fleet utilization rates. The shipping
industry uses fleet utilization to measure a companys
efficiency in finding suitable employment for its vessels and
minimizing the days its vessels are off-hire. At 99.7% as of
December 31, 2008, Navios Holdings believes that it has one
of the highest fleet utilization rates in the industry. |
|
|
|
|
Maintain customer focus and reputation for service and
safety. Navios Holdings is recognized by its customers for
the high quality of its service and safety record. Navios
Holdings high standards for performance, reliability, and
safety provide Navios Holdings with an advantageous
competitive profile. |
|
|
|
|
Enhance vessel utilization and profitability through a mix of
spot charters, time charters, and COAs and strategic backhaul
and triangulation methods. Specifically, this strategy is
implemented as follows: |
|
|
|
The operation of voyage charters or spot
fixtures for the carriage of a single cargo
from load port to discharge port; |
|
|
|
|
The operation of time charters, whereby the
vessel is hired out for a predetermined
period but without any specification as to
voyages to be performed, with the ship owner
being responsible for operating costs and the
charterer for voyage costs; and |
|
|
|
|
The use of COAs, under which Navios Holdings
contracts to carry a given quantity of cargo
between certain load and discharge ports
within a stipulated time frame, but does not
specify in advance which vessels will be used
to perform the voyages. |
In addition, Navios Holdings attempts, through selecting COAs on what would normally be
backhaul or ballast legs, to enhance vessel utilization and, hence, profitability. The cargoes are
in such cases used to position vessels at or near major loading areas (such as the U.S. Gulf) where
spot cargoes can readily be obtained. This reduces ballast time to be reduced as a percentage of
the round voyage. This strategy is referred to as triangulation.
23
Navios Holdings is one of relatively few major owners and operators of this type in the dry
bulk market, and has vast experience in this area. In recent years, it has further raised the
commercial sophistication of its business model by using market intelligence derived from its risk
management operations and, specifically, its freight derivatives hedging desk, to make more
informed decisions regarding the management of its fleet.
Competitive Advantages
Controlling approximately 5.1 million dwt (excluding Navios Logistics) in dry bulk tonnage,
Navios Holdings is one of the largest independent dry bulk operators in the world. Management
believes that Navios Holdings occupies a competitive position within the industry in that its
reputation in the global dry bulk markets permits it to enter into at any time, and take on spot,
medium or long term freight commitments, depending on its view of future market trends. In
addition, many of the long term charter deals that form the core of Navios Holdings fleet were
brought to the attention of Navios Holdings prior to ever being quoted in the open market. Even in
the open market, Navios Holdings solid reputation allows it to take in large amounts of tonnage on
a short, medium, or long term basis on very short notice. This ability is possessed by relatively
few ship owners and operators, and is a direct consequence of Navios Holdings market reputation
for reliability in the performance of its obligations in each of its roles as a ship owner, COA
operator, and charterer. Navios Holdings, therefore, has much greater flexibility than a
traditional ship owner or charterer to quickly go long or short relative to the dry bulk
markets.
Navios Holdings long involvement and reputation for reliability in the Asian region have also
allowed it to develop privileged relationships with many of the largest trading houses in Japan,
such as Marubeni Corporation and Mitsui & Co. Through these institutional relationships, Navios
Holdings has obtained relatively low-cost, long term charter-in deals, with options to extend time
charters and options to purchase the majority of the vessels. Through its established reputation
and relationships, Navios Holdings has had access to opportunities not readily available to most
other industry participants who lack Navios Holdings brand recognition, credibility, and track
record.
In addition to its superior and long-standing reputation and flexible business model,
management believes that Navios Holdings is well-positioned in the dry bulk market on the basis of
the following factors:
|
|
|
A high-quality, modern fleet of vessels that provides a variety of
operational advantages, such as lower insurance premiums, higher
levels of productivity, and efficient operating cost structures, as
well as a competitive advantage over owners of older fleets,
especially in the time charter market, where age and quality of a
vessel are of significant importance in competing for business; |
|
|
|
|
A core fleet which has been chartered-in (some through 2022, assuming
minimum available charter extension periods are exercised) on
attractive terms that allow Navios Holdings to charter-out the vessels
at a considerable spread during strong markets and to weather down
cycles in the market while maintaining low operating expenses; |
|
|
|
|
Strong cash flows from creditworthy counterparties; |
|
|
|
|
Strong commercial relationships with both freight customers and
Japanese trading houses and ship owners, providing Navios Holdings
with access to future attractive long term time charters on
newbuildings with valuable purchase options; |
|
|
|
|
Strong in-house technical management team who oversee every step of
technical management, from the construction of the vessels in Japan to
subsequent shipping operations throughout the life of a vessel,
including the superintendence of maintenance, repairs and dry docking,
providing efficiency and transparency in Navios Holdings owned fleet
operations; and |
|
|
|
|
Visibility into worldwide commodity flows through its physical
shipping operations and port terminal operations in South America. |
Management intends to maintain and build on these qualitative advantages, while at the same
time continuing to benefit from Navios Holdings favorable reputation and capacity position.
24
Shipping Operations
Navios Holdings Fleet. Navios Holdings controls a core fleet of 18 owned vessels and 28
chartered-in vessels (12 of which have purchase options). The average age of the operating fleet is
4.7 years.
Owned Fleet. Navios Holdings owns a fleet comprised of 12 modern Ultra Handymax vessels,
five Panamax vessels, and one Product Handysize vessel, whose technical specifications and youth
distinguish them in the market, where, approximately 28% of the dry bulk world fleet is composed of
20+ year-old ships. Navios Holdings has committed to acquire seven newbuild Capesize vessels, six
of them to be built in South Korea and one in Japan for an aggregate purchase price of
approximately $780.4 million.
Owned Vessels
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vessel Name |
|
Vessel Type |
|
Year Built |
|
Deadweight |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in metric tons) |
Navios Ionian |
|
Ultra Handymax |
|
|
2000 |
|
|
|
52,068 |
|
Navios Apollon |
|
Ultra Handymax |
|
|
2000 |
|
|
|
52,073 |
|
Navios Horizon |
|
Ultra Handymax |
|
|
2001 |
|
|
|
50,346 |
|
Navios Herakles |
|
Ultra Handymax |
|
|
2001 |
|
|
|
52,061 |
|
Navios Achilles |
|
Ultra Handymax |
|
|
2001 |
|
|
|
52,063 |
|
Navios Meridian |
|
Ultra Handymax |
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
50,316 |
|
Navios Mercator |
|
Ultra Handymax |
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
53,553 |
|
Navios Arc |
|
Ultra Handymax |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
53,514 |
|
Navios Hios |
|
Ultra Handymax |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
55,180 |
|
Navios Kypros |
|
Ultra Handymax |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
55,222 |
|
Navios Ulysses |
|
Ultra Handymax |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
55,728 |
|
Navios Vega(1) |
|
Ultra Handymax |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
58,792 |
|
Navios Magellan |
|
Panamax |
|
|
2000 |
|
|
|
74,333 |
|
Navios Star |
|
Panamax |
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
76,662 |
|
Navios Hyperion |
|
Panamax |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
75,707 |
|
Navios Orbiter |
|
Panamax |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
76,602 |
|
Navios Asteriks |
|
Panamax |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
76,801 |
|
Vanessa(2) |
|
Product Handysize |
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
19,078 |
|
25
Owned Vessels to be delivered
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vessel Name |
|
Vessel Type |
|
Delivery Date |
|
Deadweight |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in metric tons) |
Navios Pollux |
|
Capesize |
|
|
06/2009 |
|
|
|
181,000 |
|
Navios Happiness |
|
Capesize |
|
|
07/2009 |
|
|
|
180,000 |
|
Navios Lumen |
|
Capesize |
|
|
09/2009 |
|
|
|
181,000 |
|
Navios Aurora II |
|
Capesize |
|
|
10/2009 |
|
|
|
172,000 |
|
Navios TBN |
|
Capesize |
|
|
11/2009 |
|
|
|
172,000 |
|
Navios Phoenix |
|
Capesize |
|
|
11/2009 |
|
|
|
180,000 |
|
Navios TBN |
|
Capesize |
|
|
12/2009 |
|
|
|
172,000 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The vessel was delivered on February 18, 2009. |
|
(2) |
|
95% owned. Contracted to be sold for $24.2 million in 2009. |
Six of the owned Ultra Handymax vessels are substantially identical sister vessels (they were
all built at the Sanoyas Shipyard in Japan) and, as a result, Navios Holdings has built-in
economies of scale with respect to technical ship management. Further, they have been built to
technical specifications that exceed those of comparable tonnage.
Four of the 12 Ultra Handymax vessels each have five cranes (greater than the industry
standard), allowing for increased loading and discharging rates, thereby increasing the efficiency
of vessel operations.
All owned Ultra Handymax vessels are equipped with cranes that have 30 and 35 metric tons of
lifting capacity, allowing for lifting of different types of heavy cargoes, thereby increasing the
vessels trading flexibility and efficiency.
Six of the 12 Ultra Handymax owned vessels have CO2 fittings throughout all cargo holds,
allowing for the loading of a variety of special cargoes (such as timber and wood pulp), thereby
enhancing the potential trading routes and profitability of the vessels.
Six of the 12 Ultra Handymax vessels each have the tank top strengths in all holds are of
24mt/m2, also allowing for the carriage of heavy cargoes.
Long Term Fleet. In addition to the 18 currently operating owned vessels and seven owned
vessels to be delivered, Navios Holdings controls a fleet of nine Capesize, 11 Panamax, six Ultra
Handymax, and two Handysize vessels under long term time charters, having an average age of
approximately 3.2 years. Of the 28 chartered-in vessels, 18 are currently in operation and 10 are
scheduled for delivery at various times up to August 2013, as set forth in the following table:
26
Long term Chartered-in Fleet in Operation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year |
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase |
Vessel Name |
|
Vessel Type |
|
Built |
|
Deadweight |
|
Option(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in metric tons) |
|
|
|
|
Navios Vector |
|
Ultra Handymax |
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
50,296 |
|
|
No |
Navios Astra |
|
Ultra Handymax |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
53,468 |
|
|
Yes |
Navios Primavera |
|
Ultra Handymax |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
53,464 |
|
|
Yes |
Navios Armonia |
|
Ultra Handymax |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
55,100 |
|
|
No |
Navios Cielo |
|
Panamax |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
75,834 |
|
|
No |
Navios Orion |
|
Panamax |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
76,602 |
|
|
No |
Navios Titan |
|
Panamax |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
82,936 |
|
|
No |
Navios Sagittarius |
|
Panamax |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
75,756 |
|
|
Yes |
Navios Altair |
|
Panamax |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
83,001 |
|
|
No |
Navios Esperanza |
|
Panamax |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
75,200 |
|
|
No |
Torm Antwerp |
|
Panamax |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
75,250 |
|
|
No |
Belisland |
|
Panamax |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
76,602 |
|
|
No |
Golden Heiwa |
|
Panamax |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
76,662 |
|
|
No |
SA Fortius |
|
Capesize |
|
|
2001 |
|
|
|
171,595 |
|
|
No |
C. Utopia |
|
Capesize |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
174,000 |
|
|
No |
Beaufiks |
|
Capesize |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
180,181 |
|
|
Yes |
Rubena N |
|
Capesize |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
203,233 |
|
|
No |
Phoenix Grace |
|
Capesize |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
170,500 |
|
|
No |
Long term Chartered-in Fleet to be Delivered
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase |
Vessel Name |
|
Vessel Type |
|
Delivery Date |
|
Deadweight |
|
Option(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in metric tons) |
|
|
|
|
Phoenix Beauty |
|
Capesize |
|
|
01/2010 |
|
|
|
170,500 |
|
|
No |
Navios TBN |
|
Handysize |
|
|
03/2010 |
|
|
|
35,000 |
|
|
|
Yes |
(2) |
Kleimar TBN |
|
Capesize |
|
|
04/2010 |
|
|
|
176,800 |
|
|
No |
Navios TBN |
|
Handysize |
|
|
08/2010 |
|
|
|
35,000 |
|
|
|
Yes |
(2) |
Navios TBN |
|
Panamax |
|
|
09/2011 |
|
|
|
80,000 |
|
|
Yes |
Navios TBN |
|
Capesize |
|
|
09/2011 |
|
|
|
180,200 |
|
|
Yes |
Navios TBN |
|
Ultra Handymax |
|
|
03/2012 |
|
|
|
61,000 |
|
|
Yes |
Kleimar TBN |
|
Capesize |
|
|
07/2012 |
|
|
|
180,000 |
|
|
Yes |
Navios TBN |
|
Panamax |
|
|
01/2013 |
|
|
|
82,100 |
|
|
Yes |
Navios TBN |
|
Ultra Handymax |
|
|
08/2013 |
|
|
|
61,000 |
|
|
Yes |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Generally, Navios Holdings may exercise its purchase option after three to five years of service. |
|
(2) |
|
The initial 50% purchase option on each vessel is held by Navios Holdings. |
Many of Navios Holdings current long term chartered-in vessels are chartered from ship owners
with whom Navios Holdings has long-standing relationships. Navios Holdings pays these ship owners
daily rates of hire for such vessels, and then charters out these vessels to other parties, who pay
Navios Holdings a daily rate of hire. Navios Holdings also enters into COAs pursuant to which
Navios Holdings has agreed to carry cargoes, typically for industrial customers, who export or
import dry bulk cargoes. Further, Navios Holdings enters into spot market voyage contracts, where
Navios Holdings is paid a rate per ton to carry a specified cargo from point A to point B.
Short Term Fleet: Navios Holdings short term fleet is comprised of Capesize, Panamax
and Ultra Handymax vessels chartered-in for duration of less than 12 months. The number of short
term charters varies from time to time.
27
Exercise of Vessel Purchase Options
Since August 25, 2005, Navios Holdings has executed the following purchase options consisting
of four Ultra Handymax, six Panamax and one Capesize vessel. The Navios Meridian, Navios Mercator,
Navios Arc, Navios Galaxy I, Navios Magellan, Navios Horizon, Navios Star, Navios Hyperion, Navios
Orbiter, Navios Aurora I and Navios Fantastiks were delivered on November 30, 2005, December 30,
2005, February 10, 2006, March 23, 2006, March 24, 2006, April 10, 2006, December 4, 2006, February
26, 2007, February 7, 2008, April 24, 2008 and May 2, 2008, respectively. Navios Galaxy I was sold
to Navios Partners on November 15, 2007. In addition, on November 15, 2007, the rights to Navios
Fantastiks were sold to Navios Partners, while Navios Aurora I was sold to Navios Partners on July
1, 2008. The acquisition cost of these vessels was approximately $230.4 million. Accordingly,
Navios Holdings has options to acquire four of the remaining 18 chartered-in vessels currently in
operation and eight of the 10 long term chartered-in vessels on order (on two of which Navios
Holdings holds a 50% initial purchase option).
Management and Operation of the Fleet: Navios Holdings commercial ship management is
conducted out of its South Norwalk, Connecticut and Belgian office. All vessel operations and the
technical management of the owned vessels are conducted out of its Piraeus, Greece office, except
for one of Kleimars initial owned vessels whose management is performed by an unrelated third
party. The financial risk management related to the operation of its fleet is conducted through
both its South Norwalk and Piraeus offices, as explained more fully below.
Commercial Ship Management: Commercial management of Navios Holdings fleet involves
identifying and negotiating charter party employment for the vessels. Navios Holdings uses the
services of a related party, Acropolis Chartering & Shipping Inc., based in Piraeus, as well as
numerous third-party charter brokers, to solicit, research, and propose charters for its vessels.
Charter brokers research and negotiate with different charterers, and propose charters to Navios
Holdings for cargoes suitable for carriage by Navios Holdings vessels. Navios Holdings then
evaluates the employment opportunities available for each type of vessel and arranges cargo and
country exclusions, bunkers, loading and discharging conditions, and demurrage.
Technical Ship Management: Navios Holdings provides, through its subsidiary, Navios
ShipManagement Inc., technical ship management and maintenance services to its owned vessels and
has also provided such services to Navios Partners vessels following the management agreement
signed at the closing of the IPO of Navios Partners. Based in Piraeus, Greece, this operation is
run by experienced professionals who oversee every step of technical management, from the
construction of the vessels in Japan to subsequent shipping operations throughout the life of a
vessel, including the superintendence of maintenance, repairs and dry docking.
Operation: The operations department, which is located in Greece and Belgium, supervises
the post-fixture business of the vessels in Navios Holdings fleet (i.e., once the vessel is
chartered and being employed) by monitoring their daily positions to ensure that the terms and
conditions of the charters are being fulfilled.
Financial Risk Management: Navios Holdings actively engages in assessing financial risks
associated with fluctuating future freight rates, daily time charter hire rates, fuel prices,
credit risks, interest rates and foreign exchange rates. Financial risk management is carried out
under policies approved and guidelines established by the Companys executive management.
28
|
|
|
Freight Rate Risk. Navios Holdings uses FFAs to manage and mitigate
its risk to its freight market exposures in shipping capacity and
freight commitments and respond to fluctuations in the dry bulk
shipping market by augmenting its overall long or short position.
These FFAs settle monthly in cash on the basis of publicly quoted
indices, not physical delivery. These instruments typically cover
periods from one month to one year, and are based on time charter
rates or freight rates on specific quoted routes. Navios Holdings
enters into these FFAs through over-the-counter transactions and over
NOS ASA, a Norwegian clearing house, and LCH, the London Clearing
House. Navios Holdings FFA trading personnel work closely with the
chartering group to ensure that the most up-to-date information is
incorporated into the companys commercial ship management strategy
and policies. See Risk Factors Risks Associated with the Shipping
Industry and Our Operations Trading and complementary hedging
activities in freight, tonnages and Forward Freight Agreements (FFAs)
subject us to trading risks, and we may suffer trading losses which
could adversely affect our financial condition and results of
operations for additional detail on the financial implications, and
risks of our use of FFAs. |
|
|
|
|
Credit Risk. Navios Holdings closely monitors its credit exposure
to charterers, counter-parties and FFAs. Navios Holdings has
established policies designed to ensure that contracts are entered
into with counter-parties that have appropriate credit histories.
Counter parties and cash transactions are limited to high credit
quality collateralized corporations and financial institutions. Most
importantly, Navios Holdings has strict guidelines and policies that
are designed to limit the amount of credit exposure. We have insured
our charter-out contracts through a double AA+ rated European Union
governmental agency. If the charterer goes into payment default, the
insurance company will reimburse us for the charter payments under the
terms of the policy (subject to applicable deductibles) for the
remaining term of the charter-out contract. |
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Risk. Navios Holdings uses interest rate swap
agreements to reduce exposure to fluctuations in interest rates.
Specifically, Navios Holdings enters into interest rate swap contracts
that entitle it to receive interest at floating rates on principal
amounts and oblige it to pay interest at fixed rates on the same
amounts. Thus, these instruments allow Navios Holdings to raise long
term borrowings at floating rates and swap them into fixed rates.
Although these instruments are intended to minimize the anticipated
financing costs and maximize gains for Navios Holdings that may be set
off against interest expense, they may also result in losses, which
would increase financing costs. See Note 13 to the audited
consolidated financial statements of Navios Holdings for the year
ended December 31, 2008, included elsewhere in this document. See also
item 11 Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risks Interest Rate Risk. |
|
|
|
|
Foreign Exchange Risk. Although Navios Holdings revenues are
dollar-based, 4.4% of its expenses related to its Logistics segment
are in Uruguayan pesos, Argentinean pesos and Paraguayan Guaranies and
2.5% of its expenses related to operation of its Piraeus and Belgian
office are in Euros. Navios Holdings monitors its Euro, Argentinean
Peso, Uruguayan Peso and Paraguayan Guarani exposure against long term
currency forecasts and enters into foreign currency contracts when
considered appropriate. |
Navios Logistics Operations
Inception: On January 1, 2008, Navios Holdings formed a South American logistics business
through the combination of its existing port operations with a barge and upriver port businesses
that specializes in the transportation and storage of liquid cargoes and the transportation of dry
bulk cargoes in South America. The combined entity has been named Navios South American Logistics
Inc. (Navios Logistics).
Navios Logistics, an end-to-end logistics business which leverages Navios transshipment
facility in Uruguay with an upriver port facility in Paraguay and dry and wet barge capacity,
marked the successful conclusion of an effort Navios Holdings commenced in June 2006, when the
Company announced its intention to develop a South American logistics business. Navios Holdings
intends to continue growing its South American logistics business by opportunistically acquiring
assets complementary to its port terminal and storage facilities.
29
Navios Logistics initial focus is on the area extending from Brazil to Uruguay on the
Paraguay and Parana rivers, considering the regions growing agricultural and mineral exports, the
cost-effectiveness of river transport as compared to available alternatives and its existing
transportation infrastructure. We intend to grow the business by capitalizing on the regions
growing agricultural and mineral commodities exports and leveraging the significant cost advantage
river transport offers compared to alternatives.
Water transportation in the Hidrovía Paraguay-Paraná is considered by the governments of
Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Paraguay, and Uruguay to be the backbone of plans for integrating
regional economies. Expanding navigation of the Paraguay and Parana River system, which is the
second largest in South America, will result in an economic boom for the region, drastically
reducing transportation costs and providing the resource rich but landlocked areas of Argentina,
Paraguay, Bolivia and Brazil with direct access to the Atlantic Ocean and thus the entire world.
Tanker vessels, barges and push boats operations
Overview: Navios Logistics operates different types of tanker vessels, push
boats and wet and dry barges for the delivery of a great range of products meeting the needs of the market
between Buenos Aires, Argentina, and all the ports of the Paraná, Paraguay, Uruguay River System in
South America, commonly known as the Hidrovia (Waterway). The Hidrovia passes through five
countries, Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Paraguay and Uruguay along its 3,442 kilometers and to
maritime facilities of the South American coastline.
Infrastructure: Navios Logistics owns and operates more than 230 barges and push boats,
including two ocean-going tanker vessels. Navios Logistics fleet consists of the following: 2
handy-size tankers (ocean-going vessels), 20 push-boats, 157 dry barges, 49 oil barges, 3 LPG
barges, 2 self-propelled barges and 2 small oil tankers. Following its formation, Navios Logistics
acquired six convoys (more than 100 barges and the corresponding push boats) for dry cargo
transportation as of September 2008, two ocean-going vessels (Handysize tankers named Malva H and
Estefania H, delivered in January and July, respectively, with an aggregate capability of dwt
22,000), and is engaged on the acquisition of two more ocean-going vessels (Handysize tankers named
Makenita H and Sara H) both under construction and which are expected to be delivered during 2009,
with an aggregate capability of dwt 26,000.
Products transported: Navios Logistics transports through the Hidrovia to maritime
facilities of the South American coastline liquid cargo (hydrocarbons such as crude oil, gas oil,
naphtha, fuel oil and JP1 and vegetable oils), liquefied cargo (Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG)) and
dry cargo (cereals, cotton pellets, soy bean, wheat, limestone (clinker), mineral iron, and rolling
stones). During the year 2008, the company transported more than 2.7 million cubic meter of liquids
or tons of dry cargo (1.9 million in 2007, 1.5 million in 2006), disaggregated in more than 2.2
million cubic meters of liquids, more than 500 thousand tons of dry cargo, and more than 15
thousand cubic meters of LPG.
30
Navios Logistics contracts its cargo vessels either on a time charter basis or COA basis.
Dry Bulk Cargo Soybeans: Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay, and Bolivia produced about 39.9
million tons of soybeans in 1995 and more than 110 million tons in 2008, a compound annual growth
rate of more than 10% in that period. These countries accounted for more than 50% of the worlds
soybean production in 2008. Further, with advances in technology, productivity of farmland has also
improved. Production of corn and wheat in Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil and Paraguay has grown
significantly during the last five years. The installation of crushing plants in Bolivia and
Paraguay has generated a large volume of vegetable oils and soybean meal that are also shipped via
the river for export.
Dry Bulk Cargo Iron Ore: In the Corumba area in Brazil near the High Parana River, two
existing large iron ore mines owned by international mining companies Rio Tinto and Companhia Vale
do Rio Doce (CVRD) have been joined by a new mine owned by MMX Mineração & Metálicos S.A. (MMX).
Their combined production of iron ore, which is entirely transported by barges, has grown
significantly during past years.
Oil transportation in Paraguay: Paraguay has no local sources of petroleum, and
consequently petroleum must be imported. Barges using the rivers in the Hidrovia are currently the
preferred method of supplying Paraguay with crude and petroleum products. All the petroleum
products travel north to destinations in Northern Argentina, Paraguay and Bolivia, creating
synergies with dry cargo volumes that mostly travel south. Brazil does not yet transport any
significant quantity of petroleum products via the rivers in the Hidrovia, mainly due to lack of
discharge facilities. Currently, interior regions of Brazil near the Hidrovia are supplied over
land by truck. However, incentives exist to switch to barge transportation for petroleum product
distribution to Brazilian cities near the river.
Fleet developments and utilization in the region: In the last ten years the barge fleet in
the Hidrovia has more than doubled, while maintaining a high level of utilization. This has
occurred not only due to the growth of production in the area, but also because cargo that in the
past was transported by truck started to shift to river transport.
Liquid Port and Terminal Operations
Overview: In the region of San Antonio, Paraguay, Navios Logistics owns and operates an
up-river port terminal containing tank storage for petroleum products, oil and gas. The port
facility is used to supply international operators from Paraguay and Bolivia, attending the growing
demand of energy. Earnings derive from a tariff based on storage and logistic services in the plant
expressed in dollars per metric ton of liquid products which are petroleum derivatives such as
fuel, oil and gas. The business is developed through two main types of operations: purchase and
sale of petroleum products and storage and handling services which relate mainly to services of
inbound, storage and outbound of liquids and gas, or transporting them directly from the barges to
the trucks.
Infrastructure: The six tanks on the plant have a full capability of 35 thousand cubic
meters.
31
One additional tank (five thousand cubic meters of capability) is expected to be operational
during 2009. During the year 2008, the port handled a total of 121 thousand cubic meters.
Dry Port and Terminal Operations
Overview: Navios Logistics owns and operates the largest bulk transfer and storage port
terminal in Uruguay, one of the most efficient and prominent operations of its kind in South
America. Situated in an international tax free trade zone in the port of Nueva Palmira at the
confluence of the Parana and Uruguay rivers, the terminal operates 24 hours per day, seven days per
week, and is ideally located to provide customers, consisting primarily of leading international
grain and commodity houses, with a convenient and efficient outlet for the transfer and storage of
a wide range of commodities originating in the Hidrovia region of Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil,
Paraguay, and Uruguay.
Navios Logistics has had a lease with the Republic of Uruguay dating back to the 1950s for
the land on which it operates. The lease has been extended and may be extended further until 2045
at Navios Logistics option. Navios Holdings believes the terms of the lease reflect Navios
Holdings relationship within the Republic of Uruguay. Additionally, since the Navios Logistics
terminal is located in the Nueva Palmira Tax Free Zone, foreign commodities moving through the
terminal are free of Uruguayan taxes. Certificates of deposit are also obtainable for commodities
entering into the station facility.
There is considerable scope for further expansion of this bulk terminal operation. Navios
Logistics has recently been awarded an additional six acres of land. With this, Navios Logistics
Uruguayan port has approximately 32 acres of available river front land for future development.
Navios Logistics is in the process of evaluating several alternatives for developing all available
space. The increased flow of commodity products through the Nueva Palmira port has allowed Navios
Logistics to steadily increase throughput.
Although it is one of the smaller countries in South America, Uruguay is regarded as one of
the most stable countries in the continent. The population is almost 100% literate, with a large
middle class and a well-established democracy. The banking system is modern and efficient by
international standards.
Port Infrastructure: The port terminal stands out in the region because of its
sophisticated design, efficiency, and multimodal operations. The Navios Logistics dry port terminal
has specially designed storage facilities and conveying systems that provide tremendous flexibility
in cargo movements that help to avoid delays to trucks, vessels and barge convoys. The port
terminal offers 274,400 tons (soybean basis) of clean and secure grain silo capacity. With seven
silos (some with internal separations) available for storage, customers are assured their
commodities will be naturally separated. The port terminal has the latest generation, high
precision, independent weigh scales, both for discharging and loading activity.
The port terminal has two docks. The main outer dock is 240 meters long and accommodates
vessels of up to 85,000 dwt loading to the maximum permitted draft of the Martin Garcia Bar and
Mitre Canal. The dock has three modern ship loaders capable of loading vessels at rates of up to
20,000 tons per day, depending on commodity. The inner face of this dock is equipped for
discharging barge convoys. The secondary inner dock measures 170 meters long and is dedicated to
the discharge of barge convoys. This activity is carried out on both sides of the dock. The
terminal is capable of discharging barge convoys at rates averaging 10,000 to 14,000 tons per day,
depending on the type of barges and commodity. Fixed duty cycle cranes located on each dock carry
out the discharging of barge convoys. The process is optimized through the selection of the most
appropriate size and type of buckets according to the commodity to be discharged.
Port Operation: The commodities most frequently handled include grain and grain
by-products, as well as some ores and sugar. The port terminal receives bulk cargoes from barges,
trucks, and vessels, and either transfers them directly to dry bulk carriers or stores them in its
own modern silos for later shipment.
Dedicated professionals operate the port terminal, taking pride in the quality of service and
responsiveness to customer requirements. Management is attentive to commodity storage conditions
seeking to maintain customer commodity separation at all times and
minimize handling losses. The port terminal operates 24 hours per day, seven days per week, to provide barge and ship
traffic with safe and fast turnarounds. The ability to conduct multiple operations simultaneously
involving ocean vessels, barges, trucks, and grain silos further enables the port terminal to
efficiently service customers needs.
32
The port terminal has a uniquely simple pricing policy using a fixed fee structure for its
clients. Other regional competitors charge clients a complicated fee structure, with many variable
add-on charges. Navios pricing policy provides clients with a transparent, comprehensive, and
hassle-free quote that has been extremely well-received by port patrons. The Uruguay port terminal
operations present the additional advantage of generating revenue in U.S. dollars, whereas the
majority of its costs are in local currency.
Future Growth: The table below highlights the gradual development of export volumes through
the Navios Logistics facility in Nueva Palmira, and Navios Logistics believes this growth will
continue as both countries continue to drive for larger hard currency income.
Navios Logistics Uruguay Annual Throughput Volumes (MM metric tones)
Navios Logistics is currently in negotiations with significant existing and new customers who
have expressed high levels of interest into entering in long-term business relationships with the
company based on the growing Uruguay grain market.
Navios Logistics Uruguay Export Market: Over the past few years, Uruguay has begun to
develop its grain exports that, historically, were very small because land was allocated to cattle
and sheep farming. The rapid rise in Uruguayan exports is apparent from the chart below. Most
importantly for the Navios Logistics port terminal, the natural growth area for grain in Uruguay is
in the western region of the country on land that is located in close proximity to Nueva Palmira.
Uruguay Soy Exports
Source: MGAYP Uruguayan Agricultural Ministry
In 2004, the construction of four new cylindrical silos was completed. The silos were designed
specifically to receive Uruguayan commodities. Before these silos had been completed, local
exporters had booked their total capacity for a period of three years. This was the first time in
the terminals history that additional silo capacity was booked before completion of construction.
As a result of yet
33
further significant new customer demand from companies such as Cargill and Louis Dreyfus, as
well as from a number of smaller local grain merchandisers, in September 2005, a new 75,000 ton
silo was constructed, which is currently the largest in Uruguay. This additional silo added
approximately 35% to the terminals existing storage capacity and is serving the increased exports
of Uruguayan soybeans. The total investment for this project included the new silo, as well as two
new truck un-loaders, and new truck weigh scales. Of traditional horizontal, concrete construction,
the silo design incorporated wall separations, mechanical air ventilation systems as well as a
sensitive temperature monitoring equipment. Demand for silo space keeps growing, and the
construction of a new silo with a record capacity of 80,000 metric tons will be completed during
the second quarter of 2009, on time for the new soybean crop.
Customers
Fleet
The international dry bulk shipping industry is highly fragmented and, as a result, there are
numerous charterers. The charterers for Navios Holdings core fleet come from leading enterprises
that mainly carry iron ore, coal, and grain cargoes. Navios Holdings assessment of a charterers
financial condition and reliability is an important factor in negotiating employment of its
vessels. Navios Holdings generally charters its vessels to major trading houses (including
commodities traders), major producers and government-owned entities rather than to more speculative
or undercapitalized entities. Navios Holdings customers under charter parties, COAs, and its
counterparties under FFAs, include national, regional and international companies, such as BHP
Billiton Marketing, Arcelor Mittal, Oldendorff Carriers GmbH & Co, Cargill International SA, COSCO
Bulk Carriers Ltd., Mitsui O.S.K. Lines Ltd., Korea Line Corporation, Daichi Chuokisen, STX Pan
Ocean Co. and Taiwan Maritime Transportation Corp. During the year ended December 31, 2008 and
2007, no customer accounted for more than 10.0% of the Companys revenue. During the year ended
December 31, 2006, two customers from the vessel operations segment, Cargill International S.A. and
Mitsui O.S.K. Lines Ltd., accounted 12.3% and 10.0%, respectively, of the Companys revenue.
Tanker vessels, barges and push boats operations
Navios Logistics has a diverse customer base including large and well-known petroleum and
agricultural companies. Some of the significant customers in the last three years include Shell
Argentina, Shell Paraguay, Exxon Mobil, Cargill, Molinos, Vicentin, Petrobras (the national oil
company of Brazil), Petropar (the national oil company of Paraguay), Glencore, Repsol YPF, Repsol
YPF Bolivia and Louis Dreyfus. In 2008, the three largest customers were Petropar, Esso Petrolera
Argentina, a subsidiary of Exxon Mobil Corporation, and Shell, a subsidiary of Royal Dutch Shell
plc, which accounted for 23.5%, 13.9% and 8.3% of Navios Logistics freight revenue, respectively.
Dry Port Terminal
Navios Logistics port terminal at Nueva Palmira, Uruguay conducts business with customers
engaged in the international sales of agricultural commodities, which book portions of the port
terminals silo capacity and transship cargoes through the terminal. In 2008, ADM, Cargill, and LDC
were the customers accounting for the larger movements in volume. In 2008, the three largest
customers of the port terminal were Agrograin, a subsidiary of the Archer Daniels Midland group
(ADM), Crop, a subsidiary of Cargill and Uruagri, a subsidiary of Louis Dreyfus, which accounted
for 35%, 19%, and 13% of the port terminals revenue, respectively. In 2007, ADM accounted for
41.5%, LDC accounted for 12.4% and Cargill accounted for 9.6% of the port terminals revenue. In
2006, the two largest customers of the port terminal were Agrograin SA, a subsidiary of the Archer
Daniels Midland group which accounted for 41.8% of the port terminals revenue, and Uruagri, a
subsidiary of Louis Dreyfus which accounted for 9.7% of the port terminals revenue.
Competition
The drybulk shipping markets are extensive, diversified, competitive and highly fragmented,
divided among approximately 1,400 independent drybulk carrier owners. The worlds active drybulk
fleet consists of approximately 6,970 vessels, aggregating approximately 424 million dwt. As a
general principle, the smaller the cargo carrying capacity of a drybulk carrier, the more
fragmented is its market, both with regard to charterers and vessel owner/operators. Even among the
larger drybulk owners and operators, whose vessels are mainly in the larger sizes, only five companies are
known to have fleets of 100 vessels or more: the two largest Chinese shipping companies, China
Ocean Shipping and China Shipping Group and the three largest Japanese shipping companies, Mitsui
O.S.K. Lines, Kawasaki Kisen and Nippon Yusen Kaisha. There are about 40 owners known to have
fleets of between 20 and 100 vessels. However, vessel ownership is not the only determinant of
fleet control. Many owners of bulk carriers charter their vessels out for extended periods, not
just to end users (owners of cargo), but also to other owner/operators and to tonnage pools. Such
operators may, at any given time, control a fleet many times the size of their owned tonnage.
Navios Holdings is one such operator; others include Cargill, Pacific Basin Shipping, Bocimar,
Zodiac Maritime, Louis Dreyfus/Cetragpa, Cobelfret and Torvald Klaveness.
34
It is likely that we will face substantial competition for long term charter business from a
number of experienced companies. Many of these competitors will have significantly greater
financial resources than we do. It is also likely that we will face increased numbers of
competitors entering into our transportation sectors, including in the drybulk sector. Many of
these competitors have strong reputations and extensive resources and experience. Increased
competition may cause greater price competition, especially for long term charters.
Intellectual Property
We consider NAVIOS to be our proprietary trademark, service mark and trade name. We hold
several U.S. trademark registrations for our proprietary logos and the domain name registration for
our website.
Governmental and Other Regulations
Sources of applicable rules and standards: Shipping is one of the worlds most heavily
regulated industries, and in addition it is subject to many industry standards. Government
regulation significantly affects the ownership and operation of vessels. These regulations consist
mainly of rules and standards established by international conventions, but they also include
national, state, and local laws and regulations in force in jurisdictions where vessels may operate
or are registered, and which are commonly more stringent that international rules and standards.
This is the case particularly in the United States and, increasingly, in Europe.
A variety of governmental and private entities subject vessels to both scheduled and
unscheduled inspections. These entities include local port authorities (the U.S. Coast Guard,
harbor masters or equivalent entities), classification societies, flag state administration
(country vessel of registry), state and local governmental pollution control agencies and
charterers, particularly terminal operators. Certain of these entities require vessel owners to
obtain permits, licenses, and certificates for the operation of their vessels. Failure to maintain
necessary permits or approvals could require a vessel owner to incur substantial costs or
temporarily suspend operation of one or more of its vessels.
Heightened levels of environmental and quality concerns among insurance underwriters,
regulators, and charterers continue to lead to greater inspection and safety requirements on all
vessels and may accelerate the scrapping of older vessels throughout the industry. Increasing
environmental concerns have created a demand for vessels that conform to stricter environmental
standards. Vessel owners are required to maintain operating standards for all vessels that will
emphasize operational safety, quality maintenance, continuous training of officers and crews and
compliance with U.S. and international regulations.
International Environmental Regulations: The International Maritime Organization, or IMO,
has negotiated a number of international conventions concerned with preventing, reducing or
controlling pollution from ships. These fall into two main categories, one consisting of those
concerned generally with ship safety standards, and the other of those specifically concerned with
measures to prevent pollution.
Ship safety standards: In the former category, the primary international instrument is the
Safety of Life at Sea Convention 1974, as amended, (SOLAS), together with the regulations and codes
of practice that form part of its regime. Much of SOLAS is not directly concerned with preventing
pollution, but some of its safety provisions are intended to prevent pollution as well as promote
safety of life and preservation of property. These regulations have been and continue to be
regularly amended as new and higher safety standards are introduced with which we are required to
comply.
35
An amendment of SOLAS introduced the International Safety Management (ISM) Code, which has
been effective since July 1998. Under the ISM Code the party with operational control of a vessel
is required to develop an extensive safety management system that includes, among other things, the
adoption of a safety and environmental protection policy setting forth instructions and procedures
for operating its vessels safely and describing procedures for responding to emergencies. The ISM
Code requires that vessel operators obtain a safety management certificate for each vessel they
operate. This certificate evidences compliance by a vessels management with code requirements for
a safety management system. No vessel can obtain a certificate unless its manager has been awarded
a document of compliance, issued by the respective flag state for the vessel, under the ISM Code.
Noncompliance with the ISM Code and other IMO regulations may subject a ship owner to increased
liability, may lead to decreases in available insurance coverage for affected vessels, and may
result in the denial of access to, or detention in, some ports. For example, the United States
Coast Guard and European Union authorities have indicated that vessels not in compliance with the
ISM Code will be prohibited from trading in ports in the United States and European Union.
Another amendment of SOLAS, made after the terrorist attacks in the United States on September
11, 2001, introduced special measures to enhance maritime security, including the International
Ship and Port Facilities Security Code (ISPS Code).
Our owned fleet maintains ISM and ISPS certifications for safety and security of operations.
In addition, we voluntarily implement and maintain certifications pursuant to the International
Organization for Standardization, or ISO, for its office and ships covering both quality of
services and environmental protection (ISO 9001 and ISO 14001, respectively).
Regulations to prevent pollution from ships: In the secondary main category of
international regulation, the primary instrument is the International Convention for the Prevention
of Pollution from Ships, or MARPOL, which imposes environmental standards on the shipping industry
set out in Annexes I-VI of the Convention. These contain regulations for the prevention of
pollution by oil (Annex I), by noxious liquid substances in bulk (Annex II) by harmful substances
in packaged forms within the scope of the International Maritime Dangerous Goods Code (Annex III),
by sewage (Annex IV), by garbage (Annex V), and by air emissions (Annex VI).
These regulations have been and continue to be regularly amended as new and higher standards
of pollution prevention with which we are required to comply are introduced.
For example, MARPOL Annex VI, together with the NOx Technical Code established thereunder,
sets limits on sulfur oxide and nitrogen oxide emissions from ship exhausts and prohibits
deliberate emissions of ozone depleting substances, such as chlorofluorocarbons. It also includes
a global cap on the sulfur content of fuel oil and allows for special areas to be established with
more stringent controls on sulfur emissions. Originally adopted in September 1997, Annex VI came
into force in May 2005 and was amended in October 2008 (as was the NOx Technical Code) to provide
for progressively more stringent limits on such emissions from 2010 onwards. These regulations are
enforced by the member states. We anticipate incurring costs in complying with these more stringent
standards.
Greenhouse Gas Emissions: In February 2005, the Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations
Framework Convention on Climate Change entered into force. Pursuant to the Protocol, adopting
countries are required to implement national programs to reduce emissions of certain gases,
generally referred to as greenhouse gases, which are suspected of contributing to global warming.
Currently, the greenhouse gas emissions from international shipping do not come under the Kyoto
Protocol. The European Union confirmed in April 2007 that it plans to expand the European Union
emissions trading scheme by adding vessels. In the United States (which did not join the
Protocol), the California Attorney General and a coalition of environmental groups petitioned the
EPA in October 2007 to regulate greenhouse gas emissions from ocean-going ships under the Clean Air
Act. While the petition was originally denied, the new EPA Administration is reconsidering the
petition in its entirety. Any passage of climate control legislation or other regulatory
initiatives by the IMO, European Union, or individual countries where we operate that restrict
emissions of greenhouse gases from vessels could require us to make significant financial
expenditures that we cannot predict with certainty at this time.
36
Other international regulations to prevent pollution: In addition to MARPOL, more
specialized international instruments have been adopted to prevent different types of pollution or
environmental harm from ships. In February 2004, the IMO adopted an International Convention for
the Control and Management of Ships Ballast Water and Sediments, or the BWM Convention. The BWM
Conventions implementing regulations call for a phased introduction of mandatory ballast water
exchange requirements (beginning in 2009), to be replaced in time with mandatory concentration
limits. The BWM Convention will not enter into force until 12 months after it has been adopted by
30 states, the combined merchant fleets of which represent not less than 35% of the gross tonnage
of the worlds merchant shipping. To date, there has not been sufficient adoption of this standard
by governments that are members of the convention for it to take force. Moreover, the IMO has
supported deferring the requirements of this convention that would first come into effect to
December 31, 2011, even if it were to be adopted earlier.
European regulations: European regulations in the maritime sector are generally based on
international law. However, since the Erika incident in 1999, the European community has become
increasingly active in the field of regulation of maritime safety and protection of the
environment. It has been the driving force behind a number of amendments of MARPOL (including, for
example, changes to accelerate the time-table for the phase-out of single hull tankers, and to
prohibit the carriage in such tankers of heavy grades of oil), and if dissatisfied either with the
extent of such amendments or with the time-table for their introduction, has been prepared to
legislate on a unilateral basis. In some instances where it has done so, international regulations
have subsequently been amended to the same level of stringency as that introduced in Europe, but
the risk is well established that EU regulations may from time to time impose burdens and costs on
ship owners and operators which are additional to those involved in complying with international
rules and standards.
In some areas of regulation, the European Union has introduced new laws without attempting to
procure a corresponding amendment of international law. A directive on ship-source pollution was
adopted in 2005, imposing criminal sanctions for pollution not only caused by intent or
recklessness (which would be an offense under MARPOL), but also caused by serious negligence. The
directive could therefore result in criminal liability being incurred in circumstances where
criminal liability would not be otherwise incurred under international law. Experience has shown
that in the emotive atmosphere often associated with pollution incidents, the negligence alleged by
prosecutors has often been found by courts on grounds which the international maritime community
has found hard to understand. Moreover, there is skepticism that serious negligence is likely to
prove any narrower in practice than ordinary negligence. Criminal liability for a pollution
incident could not only result in us incurring substantial penalties or fines, but may also, in
some jurisdictions, facilitate civil liability claims for greater compensation than would otherwise
have been payable.
United States Environmental Regulations and laws governing civil liability for pollution:
Environmental legislation in the United States merits particular mention as it is in many respects
more onerous than international laws, representing a high-water mark of regulation with which ship
owners and operators must comply, and of liability likely to be incurred in the event of
non-compliance or an incident causing pollution. Additionally, pursuant to the federal laws, each
state may enact more stringent regulations, thus subjecting ship owners to dual liability.
Notably, California has adopted regulations that parallel most, if not all of the federal
regulations explained below. We intend to comply with all applicable state regulations in the ports
where our vessels call.
U.S. federal legislation, including notably the Oil Pollution Act of 1990, or OPA 90,
establishes an extensive regulatory and liability regime for the protection and cleanup of the
environment from oil spills, including bunker oil spills from drybulk vessels as well as cargo or
bunker oil spills from tankers. OPA 90 affects all owners and operators whose vessels trade in the
United States, its territories and possessions or whose vessels operate in United States waters,
which includes the United States territorial sea and its 200 nautical mile exclusive economic
zone. Under OPA 90, vessel owners, operators and bareboat charterers are responsible parties
and are jointly, severally and strictly liable (unless the spill results solely from the act or
omission of a third party, an act of God or an act of war) for all containment and clean-up costs
and other damages arising from discharges or substantial threats of discharges, of oil from their
vessels. In addition to potential liability under OPA 90 as the relevant
federal legislation, vessel owners may in some instances incur liability on an even more
stringent basis under state law in the particular state where the spillage occurred. For example,
California regulates oil spills pursuant to California Government Code section 8670 et seq. These
regulations prohibit the discharge of oil, require an oil contingency plan be filed with the state,
require that the ship owner contract with an oil response organization and require a valid
certificate of financial responsibility, all prior to the vessel entering state waters.
37
Title VII of the Coast Guard and Maritime Transportation Act of 2004, or the CGMTA, amended
OPA 90 to require the owner or operator of any non-tank vessel of 400 gross tons or more that
carries oil of any kind as a fuel for main propulsion, including bunkers, to prepare and submit a
response plan for each vessel on or before August 8, 2005. Prior to this amendment, these
provisions of OPA 90 applied only to vessels that carry oil in bulk as cargo. However, before the
federal requirements took effect, many of the individual states had previously adopted requirements
for response plans for both non-tank and vessels. The vessel response plans must include detailed
information on actions to be taken by vessel personnel to prevent or mitigate any discharge or
substantial threat of such a discharge of ore from the vessel due to operational activities or
casualties. OPA 90 had historically limited liability of responsible parties to the greater of $600
per gross ton or $0.5 million per containership that is over 300 gross tons (subject to possible
adjustment for inflation). Amendments to OPA 90 which came into effect on July 11, 2006 increased
the liability limits for responsible parties for any vessel other than a tank vessel to $950 per
gross ton or $0.8 million, whichever is greater.
These limits of liability do not apply if an incident was directly caused by violation of
applicable United States federal safety, construction or operating regulations or by a responsible
partys gross negligence or willful misconduct, or if the responsible party fails or refuses to
report the incident or to cooperate and assist in connection with oil removal activities. In
addition, liability under some state laws do not include any limits, and thus, while limitation may
be available under federal law, liability under state law is considered unlimited forcing a vessel
owner or operator to first pay under state law and then possibly seek reimbursement from the
federal government under the limitation provisions of OPA 90.
In addition, the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, or
CERCLA, which applies to the discharge of hazardous substances (other than oil) whether on land or
at sea, contains a similar liability regime and provides for cleanup, removal and natural resource
damages. Liability under CERCLA is limited to the greater of $300 per gross ton or $0.5 million for
vessels not carrying hazardous substances as cargo or residue, unless the incident is caused by
gross negligence, willful misconduct, or a violation of certain regulations, in which case
liability is unlimited.
We currently maintain, for each of our owned vessels, insurance coverage against pollution
liability risks in the amount of $1.0 billion per incident. The insured risks include penalties and
fines as well as civil liabilities and expenses resulting from accidental pollution. However, this
insurance coverage is subject to exclusions, deductibles and other terms and conditions. If any
liabilities or expenses fall within an exclusion from coverage, or if damages from a catastrophic
incident exceed the $1.0 billion limitation of coverage per incident, our cash flow, profitability
and financial position could be adversely impacted.
OPA
90 requires owners and operators of all vessels over 300 gross tons, even those that do not
carry petroleum or hazardous substances as cargo, to establish and maintain with the U.S. Coast
Guard evidence of financial responsibility sufficient to meet their potential liabilities under
OPA 90. The U.S. Coast Guard has implemented regulations requiring evidence of financial
responsibility in the amount of $900 per gross ton, which includes
the OPA 90 limitation on liability
of $600 per gross ton and the CERCLA liability limit of $300 per gross ton for vessels not carrying
hazardous substances as cargo or residue. Under the regulations, vessel owners and operators may
evidence their financial responsibility by showing proof of insurance, surety bond, self-insurance
or guaranty. On February 6, 2008, the U.S. Coast Guard proposed amendments to the financial
responsibility regulations to increase the required amount of such COFRs to $1,250 per gross ton to
reflect the 2006 increases in limits on OPA 90 liability. The increased amounts will become
effective 90 days after the proposed regulations are finalized. We believe our insurance coverage
as described above meets the requirements of OPA 90.
Under
OPA 90, an owner or operator of a fleet of vessels is required only to demonstrate evidence
of financial responsibility in an amount sufficient to cover the vessel in the fleet having the
greatest
maximum liability under OPA 90. Under the self-insurance provisions, the ship owner or operator
must have a net worth and working capital, measured in assets located in the United States against
liabilities
38
located anywhere in the world, that exceeds the applicable amount of financial
responsibility. We have complied with the U.S. Coast Guard regulations by providing a certificate
of responsibility from third party entities that are acceptable to the U.S. Coast Guard evidencing
sufficient self-insurance.
The U.S. Coast Guards regulations concerning certificates of financial responsibility
provide, in accordance with OPA 90, that claimants may bring suit directly against an insurer or
guarantor that furnishes certificates of financial responsibility. In the event that such insurer
or guarantor is sued directly, it is prohibited from asserting any contractual defense that it may
have had against the responsible party and is limited to asserting those defenses available to the
responsible party and the defense that the incident was caused by the willful misconduct of the
responsible party. Certain organizations which had typically provided certificates of financial
responsibility under pre-OPA 90 laws, including the major protection and indemnity organizations, have
declined to furnish evidence of insurance for vessel owners and operators if they are subject to
direct actions or required to waive insurance policy defenses. This requirement may have the effect
of limiting the availability of the type of coverage required by the Coast Guard and could increase
our costs of obtaining this insurance as well as the costs of our competitors that also require
such coverage. In addition to these liabilities, the vessel owner or operator may incur the costs
of response and clean-up, as well as damages to natural resources.
The United States Clean Water Act prohibits the discharge of oil or hazardous substances in
U.S. navigable waters and imposes strict liability in the form of penalties for unauthorized
discharges. The Clean Water Act also imposes substantial liability for the costs of removal,
remediation and damages, and complements the remedies available under CERCLA. Pursuant to
regulations promulgated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (the EPA), in the early
1970s, the discharge of sewage and effluent from properly functioning marine engines was exempted
from the permit requirements of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System. This exemption
allowed vessels in U.S. ports to discharge certain substances, including ballast water, without
obtaining a permit to do so. However, on March 30, 2005, a U.S. District Court for the Northern
District of California granted summary judgment to certain environmental groups and U.S. states
that had challenged the EPA regulations, arguing that the EPA exceeded its authority in
promulgating them. On September 18, 2006, the U.S. District Court issued an order invalidating the
exemption in the EPAs regulations for all discharges incidental to the normal operation of a
vessel and directing the EPA to develop a system for regulating all discharges from vessels by that
date.
To comply with this court mandate, EPA issued a final vessel general permit (VGP), that
establishes effluent discharge limits for 28 different vessel discharges. We are required to
comply with the terms of the permit, including the state specific conditions imposed by the
individual states in certifying the permit. In addition, we will be required to file a notice of
intent to continue operations under the VGP, or file for an individual permit. We are required to
install the necessary controls to meet these limitations and/or otherwise restrict our vessel
traffic in U.S. waters. The installation, operation and upkeep of these systems increase our costs
of operating in the United States and other jurisdictions where similar requirements might be
adopted. In addition, states have enacted legislation or regulations to address invasive species
through ballast water and hull cleaning management and permitting requirements.
The Federal Clean Air Act (CAA), requires the EPA to promulgate standards applicable to
emissions of volatile organic compounds and other air contaminants. Our vessels are subject to CAA
vapor control and recovery standards for cleaning fuel tanks and conducting other operations in
regulated port areas and emissions standards for so-called Category 3 marine diesel engines
operating in U.S. waters. The marine diesel engine emission standards are currently limited to new
engines beginning with the 2004 model year. In November 2007, the EPA announced its intention to
proceed with the development of more stringent standards for emissions of particulate matter,
sulfur oxides, and nitrogen oxides, and other related provisions for new Category 3 marine diesel
engines, consistent with the United States proposal to amend Annex VI of MARPOL described above.
If these proposals are adopted and apply not only to engines manufactured after the effective date
but also to existing marine diesel engines, we may incur costs to install control equipment on our
vessels to comply with the new standards. EPA has also been required pursuant to litigation, to
regulate greenhouse gas emissions. EPA has just begun the process and recently published the
mandatory
greenhouse gas reporting regulation. While these regulations currently require engine
manufacturers to report engine emissions, EPA has made it clear that they intend to continue
gathering information on whether it should require engine operators to also report. EPA may also
adopt regulations near-term, to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases. These regulations would add
to the operational and control equipment costs incurred in complying with criteria pollutant
regulations.
39
The last few years have seen an increase in air pollution regulations by U.S. state and local
authorities applying to the shipping industry. California, in particular, has adopted regulations
requiring the use of Shoreside power for shipping fleets, banning incineration within local waters,
requiring the use of low sulfur fuels, and proposals to reduce vessel speeds. These regulations
impose standards and monitoring requirements on vessel owners and operators. These regulations
require expenditures to add controls or operating methods as well as liabilities for noncompliance.
As noted above, in the United States, the California Attorney General and a coalition of
environmental groups petitioned the EPA in October 2007 to regulate greenhouse gas emissions from
ocean-going ships under the Clean Air Act. Any passage of climate control legislation or other
regulatory initiatives by the IMO, European Union, or individual countries where we operate,
including the U.S., that restrict emissions of greenhouse gases from vessels could require us to
make significant financial expenditures, the amount of which we cannot predict with certainty at
this time.
Security Regulations: Since the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, there have been a
variety of initiatives implemented to enhance vessel security. On November 25, 2002, MTSA came into
effect. To implement certain portions of the MTSA, in July 2003, the United States Coast Guard
issued regulations requiring the implementation of certain security requirements aboard vessels
operating in waters subject to the jurisdiction of the United States. Similarly, in December 2002,
amendments to SOLAS created a new chapter of the convention dealing specifically with maritime
security. The new chapter went into effect on July 1, 2004, and imposes various detailed security
obligations on vessels and port authorities, most of which are contained in the newly created ISPS
Code. Among the various requirements are:
|
|
|
on-board installation of automatic information systems to enhance vessel-to-vessel and
vessel-to-shore communications; |
|
|
|
|
on-board installation of ship security alert systems; |
|
|
|
|
the development of vessel security plans; and |
|
|
|
|
compliance with flag state security certification requirements. |
The U.S. Coast Guard regulations, intended to be aligned with international maritime security
standards, exempt non-U.S. vessels from MTSA vessel security measures provided such vessels have on
board, by July 1, 2004, a valid ISSC Certificate that attests to the vessels compliance with SOLAS
security requirements and the ISPS Code. The vessels in our initial fleet have on board valid ISSC
Certificates and, therefore, are exempt from obtaining U.S. Coast Guard-approved MTSA security
plans.
International laws governing civil liability to pay compensation or damages:
In 2001, the IMO adopted the International Convention on Civil Liability for Bunker Oil
Pollution Damage, or the Bunker Convention, which imposes strict liability on ship owners for
pollution damage in jurisdictional waters of ratifying states caused by discharges of bunker oil.
The Bunker Convention defines bunker oil as any hydrocarbon mineral oil, including lubricating
oil, used or intended to be used for the operation or propulsion of the ship, and any residues of
such oil. The Bunker Convention also requires registered owners of ships over a certain size to
maintain insurance for pollution damage in an amount equal to the limits of liability under the
applicable national or international limitation regime (but not exceeding the amount calculated in
accordance with the Convention on Limitation of Liability for Maritime Claims of 1976, as amended).
The Bunker Convention became effective on November 21, 2008, and by early 2009 was in effect in 22
states. In other jurisdictions, liability for spills or releases of oil from ships bunkers
continues to be determined by the national or other domestic laws in the jurisdiction where the
events or damages occur.
40
Outside the United States, national laws generally provide for the owner to bear strict
liability for
pollution, subject to a right to limit liability under applicable national or
international regimes for limitation of liability. The most widely applicable international regime
limiting maritime pollution liability is the 1976 Convention. Rights to limit liability under the
1976 Convention are forfeited where a spill is caused by a ship-owners intentional or reckless
conduct. Some states have ratified the 1996 Protocol to the 1976 Convention, which provides for
liability limits substantially higher than those set forth in the 1976 Convention to apply in such
states. Finally, some jurisdictions are not a party to either the 1976 Convention or the 1996
Protocol, and, therefore, ship-owners rights to limit liability for maritime pollution in such
jurisdictions may be uncertain.
Inspection by Classification Societies: Every sea-going vessel must be classed by a
classification society. The classification society certifies that the vessel is in class,
signifying that the vessel has been built and maintained in accordance with the rules of the
classification society and complies with applicable rules and regulations of the vessels country
of registry and the international conventions of which that country is a member. In addition, where
surveys are required by international conventions and corresponding laws and ordinances of a flag
state, the classification society will undertake them on application or by official order, acting
on behalf of the authorities concerned.
The classification society also undertakes, on request, other surveys and checks that are
required by regulations and requirements of the flag state. These surveys are subject to agreements
made in each individual case or to the regulations of the country concerned. For maintenance of the
class, regular and extraordinary surveys of hull, machinery (including the electrical plant) and
any special equipment classed are required to be performed as follows:
|
|
|
Annual Surveys: For sea-going ships, annual surveys are conducted for the hull and the machinery
(including the electrical plant) and, where applicable, for special equipment classed, at intervals of
12 months from the date of commencement of the class period indicated in the certificate. |
|
|
|
|
Intermediate Surveys: Extended annual surveys are referred to as intermediate surveys and typically
are conducted two and one-half years after commissioning and each class renewal. Intermediate
surveys may be carried out on the occasion of the second or third annual survey. |
|
|
|
|
Class Renewal Surveys: Class renewal surveys, also known as special surveys, are carried out for the
ships hull, machinery (including the electrical plant), and for any special equipment classed, at the
intervals indicated by the character of classification for the hull. At the special survey, the vessel is
thoroughly examined, including audio-gauging, to determine the thickness of its steel structure. Should
the thickness be found to be less than class requirements, the classification society would prescribe
steel renewals. The classification society may grant a one-year grace period for completion of the
special survey. Substantial amounts of money may have to be spent for steel renewals to pass a special
survey if the vessel experiences excessive wear and tear. In lieu of the special survey every four or
five years, depending on whether a grace period was granted, a ship owner has the option of arranging
with the classification society for the vessels integrated hull or machinery to be on a continuous
survey cycle, in which every part of the vessel would be surveyed within a five-year cycle. |
Risk of Loss and Liability Insurance
General: The operation of any cargo vessel includes risks such as mechanical failure,
physical damage, collision, property loss, cargo loss or damage, business interruption due to
political circumstances in foreign countries, hostilities, and labor strikes. In addition, there is
always an inherent possibility of marine disaster, including oil spills and other environmental
mishaps, and the liabilities arising from owning and operating
vessels in international trade. OPA 90,
which imposes virtually unlimited liability upon owners, operators and demise charterers of any
vessel trading in the United States exclusive economic zone for certain oil pollution accidents in
the United States, has made liability insurance more expensive for ship owners and operators
trading in the U.S. market. While we believe that our present insurance coverage is adequate, not
all risks can be insured against, and there can be no guarantee that any specific claim will be
paid, or that we will always be able to obtain adequate insurance coverage at reasonable rates.
Hull and Machinery and War Risk Insurances: We have marine hull and machinery and war
risk insurance, which include coverage of the risk of actual or constructive total loss, for
all of our owned vessels. Each of the owned vessels is covered up to at least fair market value,
with a deductible of $0.1 million per Panamax and $0.2 million per Capesize vessel for the hull and
machinery insurance. There are no deductibles for the war risk insurance. We have also arranged
increased value insurance for most of the owned vessels. Under the increased value insurance, in
case of total loss of the vessel, we will be able to recover the sum insured under the increased
value policy in addition to the sum insured under the hull and machinery policy. Increased value
insurance also covers excess liabilities that are not recoverable in full by the hull and machinery
policies by reason of under-insurance.
41
Protection and Indemnity Insurance: Protection and indemnity insurance is provided by
mutual protection and indemnity associations, or P&I Associations. This insurance covers
third-party liabilities in connection with its shipping activities. This includes third party
liability and other related expenses for injury or death of crew, passengers and other third
parties, loss of or damage to cargo, claims arising from collisions with other vessels, damage to
other third-party property, pollution arising from oil or other substances, towing and other
related costs, including wreck removal. Protection and indemnity insurance is a form of mutual
indemnity insurance, extended by protection and indemnity mutual associations, or clubs. Subject
to the capping discussed below for pollution, our coverage is $4.25 billion per incident. Our
current protection and indemnity insurance coverage for each owned vessel for pollution is $1.0
billion per vessel per incident. The 13 P&I Associations that comprise the International Group
insure approximately 90% of the worlds commercial tonnage and have entered into a pooling
agreement to reinsure each associations liabilities. As a member of a P&I Association, which is a
member of the International Group, we are subject to calls payable to the associations based on our
claim records as well as the claim records of all other members of the individual associations, and
members of the pool of P&I Associations comprising the International Group.
Uninsured Risks: Not all risks are insured and not all risks are insurable. The principal
insurable risks which nonetheless remain uninsured across our fleet are loss of hire and
strikes. Navios Holdings does not insure these risks because the costs are regarded as
disproportionate. These insurances provide, subject to a deductible, a limited indemnity for hire
that would not be receivable by the ship-owner for reasons set forth in the policy. Should a vessel
on time charter, where the vessel is paid a fixed hire day-by-day, suffer a serious mechanical
breakdown, the daily hire will no longer be payable by the charterer. The purpose of the loss of
hire insurance is to secure the loss of hire during such periods. In the case of strikes insurance,
if a vessel is being paid a fixed sum to perform a voyage and the ship becomes strike bound at a
loading or discharging port, the insurance covers the loss of earnings during such periods.
Credit Risk Insurance: We have insured our charter-out contracts through a double AA+
rated European Union governmental agency. If the charterer goes into payment default, the insurance
company will reimburse us for the charter payments under the terms of the policy (subject to
applicable deductibles), for the remaining term of the charter-out contract.
Risk Management
Risk management in the shipping industry involves balancing a number of factors in a cyclical
and potentially volatile environment. Fundamentally, the challenge is to appropriately allocate
capital to competing opportunities of owning or chartering vessels. In part, this requires a view
of the overall health of the market, as well as an understanding of capital costs and returns.
Thus, stated simply, one may charter-in part of a fleet as opposed to owning the entire fleet to
maximize risk management and economic results. This is coupled with the challenge posed by the
complex logistics of ensuring that the vessels controlled by Navios Holdings are fully employed.
Navios Holdings seeks to manage risk through a number of strategies, including vessel control
strategies (chartering and ownership), freight carriage and FFA trading. Navios Holdings vessel
control strategies include seeking the appropriate mix of owned vessels, long- and short term
chartered-in vessels, coupled with purchase options, when available, and spot charters. Navios
Holdings also enters into COAs, which gives Navios Holdings, subject to certain limitations, the
flexibility to determine the means of getting a particular cargo to its destination. Navios
Holdings FFA trading strategies include taking economic hedges to manage and mitigate risk on
vessels that are on-hire or coming off-hire to protect against the risk of movement in freight
market rates.
Legal Proceedings
Navios Holdings is not involved in any legal proceedings that it believes will have a
significant effect on its business, financial position, and results of operations or liquidity.
42
On November 30, 2006, we received notification that one of our FFA trading counter-parties
filed for bankruptcy in Canada. Our exposure to such counter-party was estimated to be
approximately $7.7 million. While the recovery we may obtain in any liquidation proceeding cannot
be presently estimated, based on managements current expectations and assumptions, we have
provided for $5.4 million in our 2006 financial statements and $0.5 million additional provision in
our 2008 financial statements. As of December 31, 2008, an amount of $1.1 million has been
recovered. No further information has developed since then which would change our expectations and
assumptions either to increase or decrease the provision. However, we do not believe that this will
have a material impact on our liquidity, or on our ability to make payments of principal and
interest or otherwise service our debt.
From time to time, Navios Holdings may be subject to legal proceedings and claims in the
ordinary course of business. It is expected that these claims would be covered by insurance if they
involved liabilities such as arise from a collision, other marine casualty, damage to cargoes, oil
pollution, death or personal injuries to crew, subject to customary deductibles. Those claims, even
if lacking merit, could result in the expenditure of significant financial and managerial
resources.
Crewing and Shore Employees
Navios Holdings crews its vessels primarily with Greek, Ukrainian, Georgian officers and
Filipino, Georgian, Bulgarian, Polish and Ukrainian seamen. Navios Holdings fleet manager is
responsible for selecting its Greek officers, who are hired by Navios Holdings vessel-owning
subsidiaries. Other nationalities are referred to Navios Holdings fleet manager by local crewing
agencies. The crewing agencies handle each seamans training, travel, and payroll. Navios Holdings
requires that all of its seamen have the qualifications and licenses required to comply with
international regulations and shipping conventions.
Navios Logistics crews its fleet with Argentinean and Paraguayan officers and seamen. Navios
Logistics fleet managers are responsible for selecting the crew.
With respect to shore-side employees, Navios Holdings employs 13 employees in its
South Norwalk, Connecticut office, 85 employees in its Piraeus, Greece office, and 12 employees in
its Antwerp, Belgium office. Navios Logistics employs 39 employees in its Asuncion, Paraguay
offices, with 24 employees at the port facility in San Antonio, 67 office employees in the Buenos
Aires, Argentina office and six employees in its Montevideo, Uruguay office, with an additional 95
employees working at the port facility in Nueva Palmira.
Facilities
Navios Holdings and its affiliates currently lease the following properties:
|
|
|
Navios Corporation leases approximately 12,458 square feet of space at
20 Marshall Street, South Norwalk, CT, 06820 pursuant to a lease that
expires on May 15, 2011. Navios Holdings sublets approximately 2,000
square feet of space to Hera East Holding, LLC, pursuant a sub-lease
that expires on May 15, 2011. |
|
|
|
|
Navios ShipManagement Inc. and Navios Corporation lease approximately
2,034.3 square meters of space at 85 Akti Miaouli, Piraeus, Greece,
pursuant to a lease that expires in 2017. |
|
|
|
|
Kleimar N.V. leases approximately 387 square meters of space at 5
Suikerui 2000 Antwerp, Belgium, pursuant to a lease that expires in
April 2011. |
|
|
|
|
Navios ShipManagement Inc. leases approximately 1,367.5 square meters
of space at 85 Akti Miaouli, Piraeus, Greece, pursuant to a lease
agreement that expires in 2019. |
Navios Logistics and its subsidiaries currently lease the following premises:
|
|
|
CNSA leases the land on which it operates its port and transfer
facility, located at Zona Franca, Nueva Palmira, Uruguay. This lease
is between Uruguayan National Authority of Free Zones and CNSA, which
expires on November 29, 2025, with an option to extend for another 20
years. |
|
|
|
|
Navegacion Guarani S.A. leases approximately 640 square meters of
space at Jejuí 324 corner Chile Edificio Grupo General, Asuncion,
Paraguay, pursuant to a lease that expires in June 2013. |
43
|
|
|
Mercofluvial S.A. leases approximately 91 square meters of space at
Ayolas 451 calle Oliva, Asuncion, Paraguay, pursuant to a lease that
expires in June 2013. |
|
|
|
|
Mercopar Internacional S.A. leases approximately 220 square meters of
space at Ygatimy 459 calle 14 de Mayo, Asuncion, Paraguay, pursuant to
a lease that expires in June 2013. |
|
|
|
|
Compania Naviera Horamar S.A. leases approximately 70 square meters at
Dorrego 21 bis 7° A street in the locality of Rosario, Argentina of
pursuant to a lease agreement that expires in September 2010. |
CNSA owns premises in Montevideo, Uruguay. This space is approximately 112 square meters and
is located at Juan Carlos Gomez 1445, Oficina 701, Montevideo 1100, Uruguay.
Petrolera San Antonio S.A. owns the premises from which it operates in San Antonio, Paraguay.
This space is approximately 146,744 square meters large and is located between Avenida. San Antonio
and Virgen de Caacupé, San Antonio, Paraguay.
Compania Naviera Horamar S.A. owns two storehouses located at 880 Calle California, Ciudad
Autonoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina and at 791/795 Calle General Daniel Cerri, Ciudad Autonoma de
Buenos Aires, Argentina of approximately 259 and 825 square meters, respectively.
Compania Naviera Horamar S.A. owns the premises from which operates in Buenos Aires,
Argentina. This space is approximately 2,181.22 square meters and is located in 846 Avenida Santa
Fe, Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina.
C. Organizational structure
Navios Holdings maintains offices in Piraeus, Greece, Norwalk, Connecticut, and Antwerp,
Belgium. Navios Holdings corporate structure is functionally organized: commercial ship management
and risk management are conducted through Navios Corporation and its wholly-owned subsidiaries (in
South Norwalk, Antwerp and Piraeus, respectively), while the operation and technical management of
Navios Holdings owned vessels are conducted through Navios Maritime Holdings Inc. and its
wholly-owned subsidiaries (out of Piraeus), except for one of Kleimars initial owned vessels whose
management is outsourced. Navios Logistics maintains offices in Buenos Aires, Argentina, Asuncion,
Paraguay and Montevideo, Uruguay. Navios Logistics conducts the commercial and technical management
of its vessels, barges and push boats through its wholly-owned subsidiaries. Navios Logistics also
owns the Nueva Palmira port and transfer facility indirectly through its Uruguayan subsidiary,
CNSA, and the San Antonio port facility through its Paraguayan subsidiary, Petrolera San Antonio
S.A..
All of Navios Holdings subsidiaries are wholly-owned, except for Navios Logistics and its
subsidiaries, Navios Partners and its subsidiaries, Navios Acquisition and Acropolis Chartering &
Shipping Inc. Navios Holdings owns: (a) 63.8% (65.5% excluding the 504 shares kept in escrow at
December 31, 2008) of Navios Logistics following the acquisition of Horamar and the partial sale of
CNSA in January 2008, (b) 37.1% of Navios Partners following the sale of Navios Aurora I to Navios
Partners in July 2008 and (c) 19% of Navios Acquisition following its IPO in July 2008. Acropolis
is a charter broker that acts on behalf of Navios Holdings and third parties and of which Navios
Holdings owns 50% of the outstanding equity. The disclosures below include our interests in the
publicly traded limited partnership, Navios Maritime Partners L.P. The chart below sets forth
Navios Holdings current corporate structure following the acquisition and reincorporation (all
corporations are domiciled in the Republic of the Marshall Islands except for Acropolis, Shikhar
Ventures S.A. and Sizzling Ventures Inc., which are Liberian corporations, Hestia Shipping Ltd and
Nav Holdings Limited, which are Maltese corporations, Kleimar NV, which is a Belgian corporation,
Bulkinvest S.A., which is a Luxembourgian corporation, White Narcissus Marine S.A., which is a
Panamanian corporation, and Navios Logistics subsidiaries which are incorporated in Uruguay,
Argentina, Paraguay and Panama):
44
Subsidiaries included in the consolidation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ownership |
|
Country of |
|
Statement of operations |
Company Name |
|
Nature/Vessel Name |
|
Interest |
|
Incorporation |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
Navios Maritime Holdings Inc.
|
|
Holding Company
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
1/1 12/31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Navios Corporation
|
|
Sub-Holding Company
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
1/1 12/31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Navios International
Inc.
|
|
Operating Company
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
1/1 12/31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Navimax Corporation
|
|
Operating Company
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
1/1 12/31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Navios
Handybulk Inc.
|
|
Operating Company
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
1/1 12/31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporacion Navios SA
|
|
Operating Company
|
|
100%
|
|
Uruguay
|
|
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
1/1 12/31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hestia Shipping Ltd.
|
|
Operating Company
|
|
100%
|
|
Malta
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
1/1 12/31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anemos Maritime Holdings Inc.
|
|
Sub-Holding Company
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
1/1 12/31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Navios ShipManagement Inc.
|
|
Management Company
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
1/1 12/31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NAV Holdings Limited
|
|
Sub-Holding Company
|
|
100%
|
|
Malta
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
2/2 12/31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kleimar N.V.
|
|
Operating company/Vessel
owning company
|
|
100%
|
|
Belgium
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
2/2 12/31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kleimar Ltd.
|
|
Operating company
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
9/13 12/31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bulkinvest S.A.
|
|
Operating company
|
|
100%
|
|
Luxembourg
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
2/2 12/31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Navios Maritime Acquisition Corporation
|
|
Sub-Holding Company
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
3/14 6/30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Primavera Shipping Corporation
|
|
Operating company
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
10/15 12/31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ginger Services Co.
|
|
Operating company
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
12/22 12/31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Astra Maritime Corporation
|
|
Operating company
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
10/15 12/31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Achilles Shipping Corporation
|
|
Operating company
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
1/1 12/31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apollon Shipping Corporation
|
|
Operating company
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
1/1 12/31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Herakles Shipping Corporation
|
|
Operating company
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
1/1 12/31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hios Shipping Corporation
|
|
Operating company
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
1/1 12/31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ionian Shipping Corporation
|
|
Operating company
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
1/1 12/31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kypros Shipping Corporation
|
|
Operating company
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
1/1 12/31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Meridian Shipping Enterprises Inc.
|
|
Navios Meridian
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
1/1 12/31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mercator Shipping Corporation
|
|
Navios Mercator
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
1/1 12/31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Libra Shipping Enterprises Corporation
|
|
Navios Libra II
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
|
|
1/1 11/15
|
|
1/1 12/31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alegria Shipping Corporation
|
|
Navios Alegria
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
|
|
1/1 11/15
|
|
1/1 12/31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Felicity Shipping Corporation
|
|
Navios Felicity
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
|
|
1/1 11/15
|
|
1/1 12/31 |
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ownership |
|
Country of |
|
Statement of operations |
Company Name |
|
Nature/Vessel Name |
|
Interest |
|
Incorporation |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
Gemini Shipping Corporation
|
|
Navios Gemini S
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
|
|
1/1 11/15
|
|
1/5 12/31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arc Shipping Corporation
|
|
Navios Arc
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
2/10 12/31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Galaxy Shipping Corporation
|
|
Navios Galaxy I
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
|
|
1/1 11/15
|
|
3/23 12/31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Horizon Shipping Enterprises Corporation
|
|
Navios Horizon
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
4/10 12/31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Magellan Shipping Corporation
|
|
Navios Magellan
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
3/24 12/31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aegean Shipping Corporation
|
|
Operating Company
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
1/1 12/31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Star Maritime Enterprises Corporation
|
|
Navios Star
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
12/4 12/31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aurora Shipping Enterprises Ltd.
|
|
Navios Aurora I
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
1/21 6/30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corsair Shipping Ltd
|
|
Navios Ulysses
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
6/11 12/31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rowboat Marine Inc.
|
|
Navios Vega
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
6/11 12/31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hyperion Enterprises Inc.
|
|
Navios Hyperion
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
2/26 12/31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beaufiks Shipping Corporation
|
|
Vessel Owning Company
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
6/19 12/31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sagittarius Shipping Corporation
|
|
Vessel Owning Company
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
3/6 12/31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nostos Shipmanagement Corp. (i)
|
|
Vessel Owning Company
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
7/4 12/31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portorosa Marine Corporation (i)
|
|
Navios Happiness
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
7/4 12/31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shikhar Ventures
S.A (i)
|
|
Vessel Owning Company
|
|
100%
|
|
Liberia
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
12/12 12/31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sizzling Ventures
Inc.
|
|
Operating Company
|
|
100%
|
|
Liberia
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
12/12 12/31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rheia Associates
Co.
|
|
Operating Company
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
12/12 12/31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taharqa Spirit
Corp.
|
|
Operating Company
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
12/12 12/31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rumer Holding
Ltd. (i)
|
|
Vessel Owning Company
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
12/10 12/31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chilali Corp.(i)
|
|
Vessel Owning Company
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
12/10 12/31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pharos Navigation S.A. (i)
|
|
Vessel Owning Company
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
12/11 12/31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pueblo Holdings Ltd. (i)
|
|
Navios Lumen
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
8/8 12/31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Surf Maritime Co. (i)
|
|
Navios Pollux
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
8/8 12/31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quena Shipmanagement Inc.
|
|
Operating Company
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
7/29 12/31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orbiter Shipping Corp.
|
|
Navios Orbiter
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
9/13 12/31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
White Narcissus Marine S.A.
|
|
Navios Asteriks
|
|
100%
|
|
Panama
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
4/19 12/31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Navios G.P.
L.L.C.
|
|
Operating Company
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
8/7 12/31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Navios South American Logistics Inc.
|
|
Sub-Holding Company
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
|
|
12/17 12/31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Navios Maritime Partners L.P.
|
|
Sub-Holding Company
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
|
|
8/7 11/15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prosperity Shipping Corporation
|
|
Navios Prosperity
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
|
|
10/8 11/15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aldebaran Shipping Corporation
|
|
Navios Aldebaran
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshal Is.
|
|
|
|
10/8 11/15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fantastiks Shipping Corporation
|
|
Navios Fantastiks
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
|
|
10/23 11/15
|
|
|
46
Navios South American Logistics and Subsidiaries:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ownership |
|
Country of |
|
Statement of operations |
Company Name |
|
Nature/Vessel Name |
|
Interest |
|
Incorporation |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
Navios South American Logistics Inc.
|
|
Sub-Holding Company
|
|
65.48%
|
|
Marshal Is.
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporacion Navios S.A.
|
|
Operating Company
|
|
65.48%
|
|
Uruguay
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nauticler S.A.
|
|
Sub-Holding Company
|
|
65.48%
|
|
Uruguay
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compania Naviera Horamar S.A.
|
|
Operating Company
|
|
65.48%
|
|
Argentina
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
|
|
|
Compania de Transporte Fluvial Int
S.A.
|
|
Operating Company
|
|
65.48%
|
|
Uruguay
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ponte Rio S.A.
|
|
Operating Company
|
|
65.48%
|
|
Uruguay
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thalassa Energy S.A.
|
|
Barges Owning Company
|
|
40.93%
|
|
Argentina
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HS Tankers Inc. (ii)
|
|
Vessel Owning Company
|
|
33.39%
|
|
Panama
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HS Navegation Inc.
|
|
Estefania
|
|
33.39%
|
|
Panama
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HS Shipping Ltd Inc.
|
|
Malva H
|
|
40.93%
|
|
Panama
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HS South Inc. (ii)
|
|
Vessel Owning Company
|
|
40.93%
|
|
Panama
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mercopar Internacional S.A.
|
|
Holding Company
|
|
65.48%
|
|
Uruguay
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nagusa Internacional S.A.
|
|
Holding Company
|
|
65.48%
|
|
Uruguay
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hidrovia OSR Internacional S.A.
|
|
Holding Company
|
|
65.48%
|
|
Uruguay
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Petrovia Internacional S.A.
|
|
Holding Company
|
|
65.48%
|
|
Uruguay
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mercopar S.A.
|
|
Shipping Company
|
|
65.48%
|
|
Paraguay
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Navegation Guarani S.A.
|
|
Shipping Company
|
|
65.48%
|
|
Paraguay
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hidrovia OSR S.A.
|
|
Oil Spill Response
& Salvage Services
|
|
65.48%
|
|
Paraguay
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Petrovia S.A.
|
|
Shipping Company
|
|
65.48%
|
|
Paraguay
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mercofluvial S.A.
|
|
Shipping Company
|
|
65.48%
|
|
Paraguay
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Petrolera San Antonio S.A. (PETROSAN)
|
|
Oil Storage Plant and Dock Facilities
|
|
65.48%
|
|
Paraguay
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flota Mercante Paraguaya S.A.
|
|
Shipping Company
|
|
65.48%
|
|
Paraguay
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compania de Transporte Fluvial S.A.
|
|
Shipping Company
|
|
65.48%
|
|
Paraguay
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hidrogas S.A.
|
|
Shipping Company
|
|
65.48%
|
|
Paraguay
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stability Oceanways S.A.
|
|
Shipping Company
|
|
65.48%
|
|
Panama
|
|
4/16 12/31
|
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
(i) |
|
Each company has the rights over a shipbuilding contract of a Capesize vessel. |
|
(ii) |
|
Each company has the rights over shipbuilding contract of a tanker vessel. |
48
Affiliates included in the financial statements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ownership |
|
Country of |
|
Statement of operations |
Company Name |
|
Nature/Vessel Name |
|
Interest |
|
Incorporation |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
Navios Maritime
Partners L.P.
|
|
Sub-Holding Company
|
|
37.1%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
11/16 12/31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Navios Maritime
Operating L.L.C.
|
|
Operating Company
|
|
37.1%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
11/16 12/31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Libra Shipping
Enterprises
Corporation
|
|
Navios Libra II
|
|
37.1%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
11/16 12/31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alegria Shipping
Corporation
|
|
Navios Alegria
|
|
37.1%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
11/16 12/31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Felicity Shipping
Corporation
|
|
Navios Felicity
|
|
37.1%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
11/16 12/31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gemini Shipping
Corporation
|
|
Navios Gemini S
|
|
37.1%
|
|
Marshal Is.
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
11/16 12/31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Galaxy Shipping
Corporation
|
|
Navios Galaxy I
|
|
37.1%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
11/16 12/31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prosperity Shipping
Corporation
|
|
Navios Prosperity
|
|
37.1%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
11/16 12/31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fantastiks Shipping
Corporation
|
|
Navios Fantastiks
|
|
37.1%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
11/16 12/31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aldebaran Shipping Corporation
|
|
Navios Aldebaran
|
|
37.1%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
11/16 12/31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aurora Shipping
Enterprises Ltd.
|
|
Navios Aurora I
|
|
37.1%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
7/1 12/31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acropolis
Chartering &
Shipping Inc.
|
|
Brokerage Company
|
|
50%
|
|
Liberia
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
1/1 12/31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Navios Maritime
Acquisition
Corporation
|
|
Sub-Holding Company
|
|
19%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
7/1 12/31
|
|
|
|
|
D. Property, plants and equipment
Our only material property is the owned vessels, tanker vessels, barges and push boats and the
port terminal facilities in Paraguay and Uruguay. See Item 4.B Business Overview above.
Item 4A. Unresolved Staff Comments
None.
Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects
The following is a discussion of Navios Holdings financial condition and results of
operations for each of the fiscal years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006. All of these
financial statements have been prepared in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP). You should read this section together with the
consolidated financial statements including the notes to those financial statements for the years
mentioned above which are included in this document.
This report contains forward-looking statements made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of
the Private Securities Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements are based on Navios
Holdings current expectations and observations. Included among the factors that, in our view,
could cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements contained in
this report are those discussed under Risk Factors and Forward-Looking Statements.
49
Overview
Navios Holdings is a global, vertically integrated seaborne shipping and logistics company
focused on the transport and transshipment of drybulk commodities, including iron ore, coal and
grain. We technically and commercially manage our owned fleet (except for one of Kleimars initial
owned vessels which is managed by an unrelated third party), and Navios Partners fleet, and
commercially manage our chartered-in fleet. Navios Holdings has in-house ship management expertise
that allows it to oversee every step of technical management of the owned fleet and Navios
Partners fleet including the shipping operations throughout the life of the vessels and the
superintendence of maintenance, repairs and dry-docking of the operated fleet.
On August 25, 2005, pursuant to a Stock Purchase Agreement dated February 28, 2005, as
amended, by and among ISE, Navios Holdings and all the shareholders of Navios Holdings, ISE
acquired Navios Holdings through the purchase of all of the outstanding shares of its common stock.
As a result of this acquisition, Navios Holdings became a wholly-owned subsidiary of ISE. In
addition, on August 25, 2005, simultaneously with the acquisition of Navios Holdings, ISE effected
a reincorporation from the State of Delaware to the Republic of the Marshall Islands through a
downstream merger with and into its newly acquired wholly-owned subsidiary, whose name was and
continued to be Navios Maritime Holdings Inc.
On February 2, 2007, Navios Holdings acquired all of the outstanding share capital of Kleimar
for a cash consideration of $165.6 million (excluding direct acquisition costs), subject to certain
adjustments. Kleimar is a Belgian maritime transportation company established in 1993. At the time
of the acquisition, Kleimar had 11 employees and currently is the owner and operator of Capesize
and Panamax vessels used in the transportation of cargoes. It also has an extensive COA business, a
large percentage of which involves transporting cargo to China.
On August 7, 2007, Navios Holdings formed Navios Partners under the laws of Marshall Islands.
The General Partner, a wholly owned subsidiary of Navios Holdings, was also formed on that date to
act as the general partner of Navios Partners and received a 2% general partner interest.
On January 1, 2008, pursuant to a share purchase agreement, Navios Holdings contributed (a)
$112.2 million in cash and (b) the authorized capital stock of its wholly-owned subsidiary CNSA in
exchange for the issuance and delivery of 12,765 shares of Navios Logistics, representing 63.8%
(67.2% excluding 1,007 shares of contingent consideration) of its outstanding stock. Navios
Logistics acquired all ownership interests in Horamar in exchange for (a) $112.2 million in cash,
of which $5.0 million were kept in escrow payable upon the attainment of certain EBITDA targets
during specified periods through December 2008 (the EBITDA Adjustment) and (b) the issuance of
7,235 shares of Navios Logistics representing 36.2% (32.8% excluding 1,007 shares of contingent
consideration) of Navios Logistics outstanding stock, of which 1,007 shares were kept in escrow
pending the EBITDA Adjustment.
In November 2008, part of the contingent consideration for the acquisition of Horamar was
released, as Horamar achieved the interim EBITDA target. Following the resolution of the
contingency, $2.5 million in cash and 503 shares of Navios Logistics were released to the
shareholders of Horamar. Following this release, Navios Holdings owns 65.5% (excluding 504 shares
still kept in escrow at December 31, 2008, pending achievement of final EBITDA target) of the
outstanding common stock of Navios Logistics. In accordance with the amended share purchase
agreement, the final EBITDA target may be resolved until June 30, 2009.
On July 1, 2008, Navios Holdings completed the IPO of units in its subsidiary, Navios
Acquisition, a blank check company. In the offering, Navios Acquisition sold 25,300,000 units for
an aggregate purchase price of $253.0 million. Simultaneously with the completion of the IPO,
Navios Holdings purchased Private Placement Warrants of Navios Acquisition for an aggregate
purchase price of $7.6 million. Prior to the IPO, Navios Holdings had purchased 8,625,000 Sponsor
Units for a total consideration of $25,000, of which an aggregate of 290,000 units were transferred
to Navios Holdings officers and directors and an aggregate of 2,300,000 Sponsor Units were
returned to Navios Acquisition and cancelled upon receipt. Each unit consists of one share of
Navios Acquisitions common stock and one warrant. Currently, Navios Holdings owns approximately
6,035,000 shares (19%) of the outstanding common stock of Navios Acquisition. Navios Acquisition is
no longer a wholly-owned subsidiary of Navios Holdings but accounted for under the equity method
due to Navios Holdings significant influence over Navios Acquisition.
50
In March 2009, Navios Holdings amended its facility agreement with HSH Nordbank and
Commerzbank A.G., effective as of November 15, 2008, as follows: (a) to reduce the Security Value
Maintenance (SVM) ratio (ratio of the charter-free valuations of the mortgaged vessels over the
outstanding loan amount) from 125% to 100%; (b) to obligate Navios Holdings to accumulate cash
reserves into a pledged account with the agent bank of $14.0 million ($5.0 million in March 2009
and $1.1 million on each loan repayment date during 2009 and 2010, starting from January 2009); and
(c) to set the margin at 200 bps. The amendment is effective until January 31, 2010. At December
31, 2008, Navios Holdings was in compliance with the financial covenants, including the SVM ratio,
as required under its amended facility agreement However, if Navios Holdings was required to use
the original SVM ratio on December 31, 2008 to test compliance, it may not have been in compliance.
Chartering Policy and Industry Outlook
Navios Holdings policy has been to take a portfolio approach to managing operating risks.
This policy led Navios Holdings to time charter-out to various shipping industry counterparties,
considered by Navios Holdings to have appropriate credit profiles, many of the fleet vessels that
it is presently operating (i.e. vessels owned by Navios Holdings or which it has taken into its
fleet under charters having a duration of more than 12 months) during 2006, 2007 and 2008 for
various periods ranging between one to ten years. By doing this, Navios Holdings aimed to lock-in,
subject to credit and operating risks, favorable forward cash flows which it believes will cushion
it against unfavorable market conditions. In addition, Navios Holdings actively trades additional
vessels taken in on shorter term charters of less than 12 months duration as well as COAs and FFAs.
In 2006, 2007 and 2008, this policy had the effect of generating Time Charter Equivalents
(TCE) that, while high by the average historical levels of the dry bulk freight market over the
last 30 years, were below those which could have been earned had the Navios Holdings fleet been
operated purely on short term and/or spot employment. Currently, this chartering policy has had the
effect of generating higher TCE than spot employment.
The average daily charter-in vessel cost for the Navios Holdings long term charter-in fleet
was $15,107 per day for the year ended December 31, 2008. The average long term charter-in hire
rate per vessel was included in the amount of long term hire as disclosed in Note 16 to Navios
Holdings audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2008, included
elsewhere in this document and was computed by (a) multiplying the (i) daily charter-in rate for
each vessel by (ii) number of days the vessel is in operation for the year and (b) dividing such
product by the total number of vessel days for the year. These rates exclude gains and losses from
FFAs. Furthermore, Navios Holdings has the ability to increase its owned fleet through purchase
options at favorable prices relative to the current market exercisable in the future.
Long term dry bulk fundamentals remain attractive. Navios Holdings believes that Asian demand
for commodities will remain robust on the back of continued economic growth. Chinese demand for
natural resources for steel and energy production and food products continues to be primarily
driven by urbanization and industrialization. Significant commodities purchases by Asian countries,
especially China and India, combined with favorable changing trading patterns and the growth in the
Chinese coastal trade should support freight rates for the foreseeable future. Additionally, new
longer haul trade routes have developed that Navios Holdings anticipates should serve to stimulate
ton-mile demand while port congestion continues to absorb global fleet tonnage.
Navios Holdings believes that a decrease in global commodity demand from its current level,
and the delivery of dry bulk carrier new buildings into the world fleet, would have an adverse
impact on future revenue and profitability. However, the cost advantage of Navios Holdings long
term chartered fleet, which is chartered-in at historically favorable fixed rates, will continue to
help mitigate the impact of the current decline in freight rates. The reduced freight rate
environment may also have an adverse impact on the value of Navios Holdings owned fleet and the
presently in-the-money purchase options. In reaction to a decline in freight rates, available ship
financing is also negatively impacted. Refer also to Item 3.D Risk Factors under section Risks Associated with the Shipping Industry and Our Operations.
51
Navios Holdings also owns 63.8% (65.5% excluding 504 shares still kept in escrow at December 31, 2008, pending the achievement of the final EBITDA target) of Navios Logistics. Navios
Logistics owns and operates vessels, barges and push boats located mainly in Argentina, the largest
bulk transfer and storage port facility in Uruguay, and an upriver liquid port facility located in
Paraguay. Operating results for Navios Logistics are highly correlated to South American (i) grain
production and export, in particular Argentinean, Brazilian, Paraguayan, Uruguayan and Bolivian
production and export, (ii) iron ore production and export, mainly from Brazil, and (iii) sales
(and logistic services) of petroleum products in the Paraguayan market. Navios Holdings believes
that the continuing development of these businesses will foster throughput growth and therefore
increase revenues at Navios Logistics. Should this development be delayed, grain harvests reduced,
or the market experience an overall decrease in the demand for grain or iron ore, the operations in
Navios Logistics would be adversely affected.
Fleet Development
Following is the current core fleet employment profile (excluding Navios Logistics),
including the newbuilds to be delivered. The current core fleet consists of 53 vessels totaling
5.1 million deadweight tons. The employment profile of the fleet as of April 2, 2009 is reflected
in the tables below. The 36 vessels in current operation aggregate approximately 2.8 million
deadweight tons and have an average age of 4.7 years. Navios Holdings has currently fixed 90.9%,
68.8% and 52.8% of its 2009, 2010 and 2011 available days, respectively, of its fleet (excluding
vessels, which are utilized to fulfill COAs), representing contracted fees (net of commissions),
based on contracted charter rates from our current charter agreement of $243.4 million, $275.2
million and $236.5 million, respectively. Although these fees are based on contractual charter
rates, any contract is subject to performance by the counterparties and us. Additionally, the level
of these fees would decrease depending on the vessels off-hire days to perform periodic
maintenance. The average contractual daily charter-out rate for the core fleet (excluding vessels,
which are utilized to fulfill COAs) is $26,626, $32,708 and $35,726 for 2009, 2010 and 2011,
respectively. The average daily charter-in rate for the active long term charter-in vessels
(excluding vessels, which are utilized to fulfill COAs) for 2009 is $9,988.
Owned Vessels
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charter-out |
|
Expiration |
Vessels |
|
Type |
|
Built |
|
DWT |
|
Rate (1) |
|
Date (2) |
Navios Ionian |
|
Ultra Handymax |
|
|
2000 |
|
|
|
52,068 |
|
|
|
15,200 |
|
|
|
04/09/2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,970 |
|
|
|
04/01/2011 |
|
Navios Apollon |
|
Ultra Handymax |
|
|
2000 |
|
|
|
52,073 |
|
|
|
23,700 |
|
|
|
11/08/2012 |
|
Navios Horizon |
|
Ultra Handymax |
|
|
2001 |
|
|
|
50,346 |
|
|
|
36,100 |
|
|
|
08/24/2011 |
|
Navios Herakles |
|
Ultra Handymax |
|
|
2001 |
|
|
|
52,061 |
|
|
|
11,400 |
|
|
|
03/30/2010 |
|
Navios Achilles |
|
Ultra Handymax |
|
|
2001 |
|
|
|
52,063 |
|
|
|
38,009 |
|
|
|
12/25/2011 |
|
Navios Meridian |
|
Ultra Handymax |
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
50,316 |
|
|
|
23,700 |
|
|
|
10/08/2012 |
|
Navios Mercator |
|
Ultra Handymax |
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
53,553 |
|
|
|
31,350 |
|
|
|
02/12/2014 |
|
Navios Arc |
|
Ultra Handymax |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
53,514 |
|
|
|
27,693 |
|
|
|
05/25/2009 |
|
Navios Hios |
|
Ultra Handymax |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
55,180 |
|
|
|
9,500 |
|
|
|
05/02/2009 |
|
Navios Kypros |
|
Ultra Handymax |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
55,222 |
|
|
|
34,024 |
|
|
|
02/14/2011 |
|
Navios Ulysses |
|
Ultra Handymax |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
55,728 |
|
|
|
31,281 |
|
|
|
10/12/2013 |
|
Navios Vega(4) |
|
Ultra Handymax |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
58,792 |
|
|
|
12,350 |
|
|
|
02/18/2011 |
|
Navios Magellan |
|
Panamax |
|
|
2000 |
|
|
|
74,333 |
|
|
|
21,850 |
|
|
|
01/20/2010 |
|
Navios Star |
|
Panamax |
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
76,662 |
|
|
|
21,375 |
|
|
|
01/21/2010 |
|
Navios Hyperion |
|
Panamax |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
75,707 |
|
|
|
37,050 |
|
|
|
04/01/2014 |
|
Navios Orbiter |
|
Panamax |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
76,602 |
|
|
|
37,147 |
|
|
|
04/01/2014 |
|
Navios Asteriks |
|
Panamax |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
76,801 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vanessa(5) |
|
Product Handysize |
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
19,078 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52
Long Term Chartered-in Vessels
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase |
|
Charter-out |
|
Expiration |
Vessels |
|
Type |
|
Built |
|
DWT |
|
Option (3) |
|
Rate (1) |
|
Date (2) |
Navios Vector(6) |
|
Ultra Handymax |
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
50,296 |
|
|
No |
|
|
9,738 |
|
|
|
10/17/2009 |
|
Navios Astra |
|
Ultra Handymax |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
53,468 |
|
|
Yes |
|
|
34,200 |
|
|
|
08/11/2009 |
|
Navios Primavera |
|
Ultra Handymax |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
53,464 |
|
|
Yes |
|
|
20,046 |
|
|
|
05/09/2010 |
|
Navios Armonia |
|
Ultra Handymax |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
55,100 |
|
|
No |
|
|
23,700 |
|
|
|
06/07/2013 |
|
Navios Cielo |
|
Panamax |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
75,834 |
|
|
No |
|
|
14,773 |
|
|
|
06/12/2010 |
|
Navios Orion |
|
Panamax |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
76,602 |
|
|
No |
|
|
49,400 |
|
|
|
12/15/2012 |
|
Navios Titan |
|
Panamax |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
82,936 |
|
|
No |
|
|
27,100 |
|
|
|
11/24/2010 |
|
Navios Sagittarius |
|
Panamax |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
75,756 |
|
|
Yes |
|
|
26,125 |
|
|
|
11/19/2018 |
|
Navios Altair |
|
Panamax |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
83,001 |
|
|
No |
|
|
22,715 |
|
|
|
09/20/2009 |
|
Navios Esperanza |
|
Panamax |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
75,200 |
|
|
No |
|
|
12,350 |
|
|
|
04/22/2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,513 |
|
|
|
02/19/2013 |
|
Torm Antwerp |
|
Panamax |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
75,250 |
|
|
No |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Belisland |
|
Panamax |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
76,602 |
|
|
No |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Golden Heiwa |
|
Panamax |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
76,662 |
|
|
No |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SA Fortius |
|
Capesize |
|
|
2001 |
|
|
|
171,595 |
|
|
No |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Utopia |
|
Capesize |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
174,000 |
|
|
No |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beaufiks |
|
Capesize |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
180,181 |
|
|
Yes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rubena N |
|
Capesize |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
203,233 |
|
|
No |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Phoenix Grace |
|
Capesize |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
170,500 |
|
|
No |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vessels to be Delivered
Long Term Chartered-in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Delivery |
|
Purchase |
|
|
Vessels |
|
Type |
|
Date |
|
Option |
|
DWT |
Phoenix Beauty |
|
Capesize |
|
|
01/2010 |
|
|
No |
|
|
170,500 |
|
Navios TBN |
|
Handysize |
|
|
03/2010 |
|
|
Yes(7) |
|
|
35,000 |
|
Kleimar TBN |
|
Capesize |
|
|
04/2010 |
|
|
No |
|
|
176,800 |
|
Navios TBN |
|
Handysize |
|
|
08/2010 |
|
|
Yes(7) |
|
|
35,000 |
|
Navios TBN |
|
Panamax |
|
|
09/2011 |
|
|
Yes |
|
|
80,000 |
|
Navios TBN |
|
Capesize |
|
|
09/2011 |
|
|
Yes |
|
|
180,200 |
|
Navios TBN |
|
Ultra Handymax |
|
|
03/2012 |
|
|
Yes |
|
|
61,000 |
|
Kleimar TBN |
|
Capesize |
|
|
07/2012 |
|
|
Yes |
|
|
180,000 |
|
Navios TBN |
|
Panamax |
|
|
01/2013 |
|
|
Yes |
|
|
82,100 |
|
Navios TBN |
|
Ultra Handymax |
|
|
08/2013 |
|
|
Yes |
|
|
61,000 |
|
53
Owned Vessels
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charter- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
out |
|
Expiration |
Vessels |
|
Type |
|
Delivery Date |
|
DWT |
|
Rate (1) |
|
Date (2) |
Navios Pollux |
|
Capesize |
|
|
06/2009 |
|
|
|
181,000 |
|
|
|
42,250 |
|
|
|
06/2019 |
|
Navios Happiness |
|
Capesize |
|
|
07/2009 |
|
|
|
180,000 |
|
|
|
55,100 |
|
|
|
07/2014 |
|
Navios Lumen |
|
Capesize |
|
|
09/2009 |
|
|
|
181,000 |
|
|
|
44,850 |
|
|
|
09/2016 |
|
Navios Aurora II |
|
Capesize |
|
|
10/2009 |
|
|
|
172,000 |
|
|
|
41,325 |
|
|
|
10/2019 |
|
Navios TBN |
|
Capesize |
|
|
11/2009 |
|
|
|
172,000 |
|
|
|
57,000 |
|
|
|
11/2014 |
|
Navios Phoenix(8) |
|
Capesize |
|
|
11/2009 |
|
|
|
180,000 |
|
|
|
45,500 |
|
|
|
11/2014 |
|
Navios TBN(9) |
|
Capesize |
|
|
12/2009 |
|
|
|
172,000 |
|
|
|
39,900 |
|
|
|
12/2019 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Net Time Charter-out Rate per day (net of commissions). |
|
(2) |
|
Estimated dates assuming midpoint of redelivery by charterers. |
|
(3) |
|
Generally, Navios Holdings may exercise its purchase option after three to five years of service. |
|
(4) |
|
The vessel was delivered on February 18, 2009. |
|
(5) |
|
The vessel is contracted to be sold for $24.2 million in 2009. The vessel is 95% owned. |
|
(6) |
|
Charterer has the right to extend period up to December 2010 at similar daily charter-out rate. |
|
(7) |
|
Navios Holdings holds the initial 50% purchase option on each vessel. |
|
(8) |
|
Allocated to a long term COA contract. |
|
(9) |
|
The vessel has been chartered-out for a ten-year period at a daily rate of $39,900 if delivered prior to December 31, 2009 or at a daily rate of $37,762 if delivered
in the first quarter of 2010. |
Since August 25, 2005, Navios Holdings has executed the following purchase options with
respect to four Ultra Handymax, six Panamax and one Capesize vessel. The Navios Meridian, Navios
Mercator, Navios Arc, Navios Galaxy I, Navios Magellan, Navios Horizon, Navios Star, Navios
Hyperion, Navios Orbiter, Navios Aurora I and Navios Fantastiks were delivered on November 30,
2005, December 30, 2005, February 10, 2006, March 23, 2006, March 24, 2006, April 10, 2006,
December 4, 2006, February 26, 2007, February 7, 2008, April 24, 2008 and May 2, 2008,
respectively. Navios Galaxy I was sold to Navios Partners, on November 15, 2007. In addition,
the rights to Navios Fantastiks were sold to Navios Partners on November 15, 2007, while Navios
Aurora I was sold to Navios Partners on July 1, 2008. The acquisition cost of these vessels was
approximately $230.4 million in the aggregate. Accordingly, Navios Holdings has options to acquire
four of the remaining 18 chartered-in vessels currently in operation and eight of the 10 long term
chartered-in vessels on order (on two of the eight purchase options Navios Holdings holds a 50%
initial purchase option).
Recent Developments
Financing:
Navios Holdings obtained $353.5 million in debt financing which includes: (i) a ten-year term
financing for $120.0 million, secured at 60% of original vessel values and interest at Libor plus
190 bps concluded in February 2009 to partially finance the acquisition of two Capesize
newbuildings; (ii) a three-year term convertible bond of $33.5 million with a coupon of 2% and a
conversion price of $11.00 per share to partially finance the acquisition of Navios Vega in
February 2009; and (iii) a two-year revolver for $200.0 million in total ($90.0 million concluded
in December 2008 and $110.0 million in March 2009), with interest at Libor plus 275 bps to be used
for general corporate purposes.
Cancellation of twelve unfixed newbuildings:
In November 2008, Navios Holdings cancelled three of the Capesize vessels scheduled for
delivery to Navios Holdings owned fleet in the fourth quarter of 2009 and the first quarter of
2010. These vessels had not been chartered-out. Installments already paid to the shipyard were
applied towards payments on three other Capesize vessels under construction with the same shipyard
in South Korea. The cancellation fee was $1.5 million in total.
54
In October 2008, Navios Holdings cancelled six Kamsarmax vessels scheduled for delivery in
2010 and 2011 to its long term charter-in fleet. In November 2008, Navios Holdings also cancelled
three Handysize vessels scheduled for delivery to its long term charter-in fleet in 2010 and 2011.
These vessels had not been chartered out. There was no fee for these cancellations.
Acquisition of Vessels:
On February 18, 2009, Navios Holdings took delivery of Navios Vega, a 2009 built, 58,792 dwt
Ultra Handymax vessel. The total acquisition price of the vessel amounted to approximately $73.5
million. The vessel commenced a two-year time charter at a net daily rate of $12,350. The
acquisition of the vessel was financed by the Navios Holdings existing cash and by issuing the
$33.5 million convertible bond discussed above.
On October 10, 2008, Navios Holdings took delivery of Navios Ulysses, a 2007 built, 55,728 dwt
Ultra Handymax vessel built in Japan. The total acquisition price of the vessel amounted to $79.1
million and was financed through Companys existing cash. The vessel commenced a five-year time
charter at a net daily rate of $31,281.
Navios Partners:
On July 1, 2008, Navios Holdings sold the Navios Aurora I, a 75,397 dwt Panamax vessel built
in 2005, to Navios Partners for approximately $79.9 million, consisting of $35.0 million in cash
and 3,131,415 common units of Navios Partners. The number of the common units issued was calculated
using the $14.3705 volume weighted average trading price for the 10 business days immediately prior
to the closing date. Following the sale of Navios Aurora I, Navios Holdings owns a 51.6% interest
in Navios Partners which includes a 2% general partner interest.
Following the purchase of the Navios Aurora I, Navios Partners currently operates nine dry
bulk carriers. Dividends received by Navios Holdings with respect to the investment in Navios
Partners for the year ended December 31, 2008 were $14.4 million in the aggregate.
Navios Partners is engaged in the seaborne transportation services of a wide range of drybulk
commodities including iron ore, coal, grain and fertilizer, chartering its vessels under medium to
long term charters.
Navios Logistics:
Navios Logistics completed its acquisition program of six push boats, 108 dry barges and three
oil barges. Navios Logistics also took delivery of Estefania H on July 25, 2008, a 12,000 dwt
product tanker, built in 2008 which was employed as of August 2, 2008 in the Argentinean cabotage
business. Navios Logistics expects a new 80,000 metric ton silo which is currently under
construction to be fully operational by the second quarter of 2009, in time for the new crop season. The
construction of this silo was fully funded from Navios Logistics internally generated cash.
Navios Logistics was formed in December 2007 and through the acquisition of control in January
2008 of Horamar which was established in 1975. Navios Logistics specializes in transporting and
storing liquid and dry bulk cargoes in the Hidrovia region connecting Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil,
Paraguay and Uruguay. Navios Logistics currently controls a fleet of 240 barges and vessels. It
also owns and operates an upriver oil storage and transfer facility in Paraguay and the largest
bulk transfer and storage port terminal in Uruguay.
Navios Acquisition:
The initial public offering of Navios Acquisition closed on July 1, 2008. The offering raised
gross proceeds of $253.0 million. The units, common stock and warrants trade on the NYSE under the
symbols NNA.U, NNA, and NNA WS, respectively. Navios Holdings currently holds a 19% interest in
Navios Acquisition. Simultaneously with the completion of the IPO, Navios Holdings purchased
7,600,000 private placement warrants of Navios Acquisition for an aggregate purchase price of $7.6
million.
55
Share Repurchase Authorization:
In October 2008, Navios Holdings completed a $50.0 million share repurchase program of Navios
Holdings common stock which was initially approved by the Board of Directors on February 14, 2008.
A total of 6,959,290 shares were repurchased under this program.
In November 2008, the Board of Directors approved a share repurchase program of up to
$25.0 million of Navios Holdings common stock pursuant to a program adopted under Rule 10b5-1
under the Securities Exchange Act. The program does not require any minimum purchase or any
specific number or amount of shares and may be suspended or reinstated at any time in Navios
Holdings discretion and without notice. As of December 31, 2008 and March 31, 2009, 575,580 and
907.480 shares had been repurchased, respectively. Repurchases are subject to restrictions under
the terms of our credit facilities and senior notes.
Dividends:
On February 13, 2009, the Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend in respect of
the fourth quarter of 2008 of $0.06 per share of common stock which
was paid on April 3, 2009 to
stockholders on record as of March 16, 2009.
Other Equity Adjustments:
On December 16, 2008, pursuant to the 2006 Employee, Director and Consultant Stock Plan (the
Stock Plan), Navios Holdings issued 250,672 restricted shares of common stock to its employees
and directors.
In January 2009, 12,568 restricted shares were issued after the vesting of the respective
restricted stock units.
In February 2009, pursuant to the Stock Plan, Navios Holdings issued 55,675 restricted shares
of common stock to its employees and directors.
During the year ended December 31, 2008, Navios Holdings issued 1,351,368 shares of common
stock upon exercise of then outstanding warrants generating proceeds of $6.8 million. The remaining
6,451,337 unexercised warrants were expired and cancelled on December 9, 2008 in accordance with
their terms.
Following the issuances and cancellations of shares, described above, Navios Holdings had
100,488,784 shares of common stock outstanding as of December 31, 2008 and 100,225,217 shares of
common stock outstanding as of March 31, 2009.
A. Operating Results
Factors Affecting Navios Holdings Results of Operations:
Navios Holdings actively manages the risk in its operations by: (i) operating the vessels in
its fleet in accordance with all applicable international standards of safety and technical ship
management; (ii) enhancing vessel utilization and profitability through an appropriate mix of long
term charters complemented by spot charters (time charters for short term employment) and COAs;
(iii) monitoring the financial impact of corporate exposure from both physical and FFAs
transactions; (iv) monitoring market and counterparty credit risk limits; (v) adhering to risk
management and operation policies and procedures; and (vi) requiring counterparty credit approvals.
Navios Holdings believes that the important measures for analyzing trends in its results of
operations consist of the following:
56
|
|
|
Market Exposure: Navios Holdings manages the size and composition
of its fleet, by chartering and owning vessels, to adjust to
anticipated changes in market rates. Navios Holdings aims at achieving
an appropriate balance between owned vessels and long and short term
chartered-in vessels and controls approximately 5.1 million dwt in dry
bulk tonnage. Navios Holdings options to extend the duration of
vessels it has under long term time charter (durations of over 12
months) and its purchase options on chartered vessel (see separate
table) permits Navios Holdings to adjust the cost and the fleet size
to correspond to market conditions. |
|
|
|
|
Available days: Available days is the total number of days a vessel
is controlled by a company less the aggregate number of days that the
vessel is off-hire due to scheduled repairs or repairs under
guarantee, vessel upgrades or special surveys. The shipping industry
uses available days to measure the number of days in a period during
which vessels should be capable of generating revenues. |
|
|
|
|
Operating days: Operating days is the number of available days in a
period less the aggregate number of days that the vessels are off-hire
due to any reason, including lack of demand or unforeseen
circumstances. The shipping industry uses operating days to measure
the aggregate number of days in a period during which vessels actually
generate revenues. |
|
|
|
|
Fleet utilization: Fleet utilization is obtained by dividing the
number of operating days during a period by the number of available
days during the period. The shipping industry uses fleet utilization
to measure a companys efficiency in finding suitable employment for
its vessels and minimizing the amount of days that its vessels are
off-hire for reasons other than scheduled repairs or repairs under
guarantee, vessel upgrades, special surveys or vessel positioning. |
|
|
|
|
TCE: TCE rates are defined as voyage and time charter revenues plus
gains or losses on FFA less voyage expenses during a period divided by
the number of available days during the period. Navios Holdings
includes the gains or losses on FFA in the determination of TCE rates
as neither voyage and time charter revenues nor gains or losses on FFA
are evaluated in isolation. Rather, the two are evaluated together to
determine total earnings per day. The TCE rate is a standard shipping
industry performance measure used primarily to compare daily earnings
generated by vessels on time charters with daily earnings generated by
vessels on voyage charters, because charter hire rates for vessels on
voyage charters are generally not expressed in per day amounts, while
charter hire rates for vessels on time charters generally are
expressed in such amounts. |
Voyage and Time Charter
Revenues are driven primarily by the number of vessels in the fleet, the number of days during
which such vessels operate and the amount of daily charter hire rates that the vessels earn under
charters, which, in turn, are affected by a number of factors, including:
|
|
|
the duration of the charters; |
|
|
|
|
the level of spot market rates at the time of charters; |
|
|
|
|
decisions relating to vessel acquisitions and disposals; |
|
|
|
|
the amount of time spent positioning vessels; |
|
|
|
|
the amount of time that vessels spend in dry-dock undergoing repairs and upgrades; |
|
|
|
|
the age, condition and specifications of the vessels; and |
|
|
|
|
the aggregate level of supply and demand in the dry bulk shipping industry. |
Time charters are available for varying periods, ranging from a single trip (spot charter) to
long term which may be many years. In general, a long term time charter assures the vessel owner of
a consistent stream of revenue. Operating the vessel in the spot market affords the owner greater
spot market opportunity, which may result in high rates when vessels are in high demand or low
rates when vessel availability exceeds demand. Vessel charter rates are affected by world
economics, international events, weather conditions, strikes, governmental policies, supply and demand, and many other
factors that might be beyond the control of management.
57
Consistent with industry practice, Navios Holdings uses TCE rates, which consist of revenue
from vessels operating on time charters and voyage revenue less voyage expenses from vessels
operating on voyage charters in the spot market, as a method of analyzing fluctuations between
financial periods and as a method of equating revenue generated from a voyage charter to time
charter revenue.
TCE revenue also serves as industry standard for measuring revenue and comparing results
between geographical regions and among competitors.
The cost to maintain and operate a vessel increases with the age of the vessel. Older vessels
are less fuel efficient, cost more to insure and require upgrades from time to time to comply with
new regulations. The average age of Navios Holdings owned fleet is 6.2 years. But as such fleet
ages or if Navios Holdings expands its fleet by acquiring previously owned and older vessels the
cost per vessel would be expected to rise and, assuming all else, including rates, remains
constant, vessel profitability would be expected to decrease.
Spot Charters, Contracts of Affreightment (COAs), and Forward Freight Agreements (FFAs)
Navios Holdings enhances vessel utilization and profitability through a mix of voyage
charters, short term charter-out contracts, COAs and strategic backhaul cargo contracts, as
follows:
|
|
|
The operation of voyage charters or spot charter-out fixtures for the
carriage of a single cargo between load and discharge port; |
|
|
|
|
The use of COAs, under which Navios Holdings contracts to carry a
given quantity of cargo between certain load and discharge ports
within a stipulated time frame; and |
|
|
|
|
The use of FFAs both as economic hedges in reducing market risk on
specific vessels, freight commitments or the overall fleet and in
order to increase or reduce the size of its exposure to the dry bulk
shipping market. |
In addition, Navios Holdings, through selecting COAs on what would normally be backhaul or
ballast legs, attempts to enhance vessel utilization and profitability. The cargoes are used to
position vessels at or near major loading areas (such as the US Gulf) where spot cargoes can
readily be obtained. This enables ballast time to be reduced as a percentage of the round voyage.
This strategy is referred to as triangulation.
Navios Holdings enters into COAs with major industrial end users of bulk products, primarily
in the steel, energy and grain sectors. These contracts are entered into not only with a view to
making profit but also as a means of maintaining relationships, obtaining market information and
continuing a market presence in this market segment. Navios Holdings has adopted a strategy of
entering into COAs to carry freight into known loading areas, such as the US Gulf and the Gulf of
St. Lawrence, where subsequent spot or voyage charters can be obtained.
Navios Holdings enters into dry bulk shipping FFAs as economic hedges relating to identifiable
ship and or cargo positions and as economic hedges of transactions the Company expects to carry out
in the normal course of its shipping business. By utilizing certain derivative instruments,
including dry bulk shipping FFAs, the Company manages the financial risk associated with
fluctuating market conditions. In entering into these contracts, the Company has assumed the risk
that might arise from the possible inability of counterparties to meet the terms of their
contracts.
As of December 31, 2008, none of our FFAs, qualified for hedge accounting treatment, while
four of them qualified as of December 31, 2007. Dry bulk FFAs traded by the Company that do not
qualify for hedge accounting are shown at fair value through the statement of operations.
FFAs cover periods generally ranging from one month to one year and are based on time charter
rates or freight rates on specific quoted routes. FFAs are executed either over-the-counter,
between two parties, or through NOS ASA, a Norwegian clearing house, and LCH the London clearing
house. FFAs are settled in cash monthly based on publicly quoted indices.
58
NOS ASA and LCH call for both base and margin collaterals, which are funded by Navios
Holdings, and which in turn substantially eliminates counterparty risk. Certain portions of these
collateral funds may be restricted at any given time as determined by NOS ASA and LCH.
At the end of each calendar quarter, the fair value of dry bulk shipping FFAs traded
over-the-counter are determined from an index published in London, United Kingdom and the fair
value of those FFAs traded with NOS ASA and LCH are determined from the NOS ASA and LCH valuations
accordingly. Navios Holdings has implemented specific procedures designed to respond to credit risk
associated with over-the-counter trades, including the establishment of a list of approved
counterparties and a credit committee which meets regularly.
Statement of Operations Breakdown by Segment
Navios Holdings reports financial information and evaluates its operations by charter revenues
and not by vessel type, length of ship employment, customers or type of charter. Navios Holdings
does not use discrete financial information to evaluate the operating results for each such type of
charter. Although revenue can be identified for these types of charters, management does not
identify expenses, profitability or other financial information for these charters. As a result,
Navios Holdings reviews operating results solely by revenue per day and operating results of the
owned and chartered-in fleet and, thus, the Company has determined that it has two reportable
segments, Vessel Operations and Logistics Business. Following the acquisition of Horamar in January
2008 and the formation of Navios Logistics, the Company renamed its Port Terminal segment to
Logistics Business segment, to include the activities of Horamar which provides similar products
and services in the region that Navios Holdings existing port facility currently operates. The
reportable segments reflect the internal organization of Navios Holdings and strategic businesses
that offer different products and services. The Vessel Operations business consists of
transportation and handling of bulk cargoes through ownership, operation, and trading of vessels,
freight and FFAs. The Logistics Business consists of operating ports and transfer station
terminals, handling of vessels, barges and push boats as well as upriver transport facilities in
the Hidrovia region. Navios Holdings measures segment performance based on net income. For further
segment information, please see Note 20 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
For a more detailed discussion about Navios Logistics Segment refer to the section Navios
South American Logistics Inc. further below.
Period over Period Comparisons
For the year ended December 31, 2008 compared to the year ended December 31, 2007
The following table presents consolidated revenue and expense information for each of the
years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 and was derived from the audited consolidated revenue and
expense accounts of Navios Holdings for each of the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended |
|
|
Year ended |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(in thousands of U.S. dollars) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
1,246,062 |
|
|
$ |
758,420 |
|
Gain on FFAs |
|
|
16,244 |
|
|
|
26,379 |
|
Time charter, voyage and logistic business expenses |
|
|
(1,066,239 |
) |
|
|
(557,573 |
) |
Direct vessel expenses |
|
|
(26,621 |
) |
|
|
(27,892 |
) |
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
(40,001 |
) |
|
|
(23,058 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(57,062 |
) |
|
|
(31,900 |
) |
Provision for losses on accounts receivable |
|
|
(2,668 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Interest income from investments in finance lease |
|
|
2,185 |
|
|
|
3,507 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
7,753 |
|
|
|
10,819 |
|
Interest expense and finance cost, net |
|
|
(49,128 |
) |
|
|
(51,089 |
) |
Gain on sale of assets/partial sale of subsidiary |
|
|
27,817 |
|
|
|
167,511 |
|
Other income |
|
|
948 |
|
|
|
445 |
|
59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended |
|
|
Year ended |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(in thousands of U.S. dollars) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Other expense |
|
|
(12,584 |
) |
|
|
(2,046 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before equity in net earnings of affiliated
companies and joint venture |
|
|
46,706 |
|
|
|
273,523 |
|
Equity in net earnings of affiliated companies and
joint venture |
|
|
17,431 |
|
|
|
1,929 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before taxes and minority interest |
|
|
64,137 |
|
|
|
275,452 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
56,113 |
|
|
|
(4,451 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income before minority interest |
|
$ |
120,250 |
|
|
$ |
271,001 |
|
Minority interest |
|
|
(1,723 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
118,527 |
|
|
$ |
271,001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Set forth below are selected historical and statistical data for Navios Holdings for each of
the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 that the Company believes may be useful in better
understanding the Companys financial position and results of operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
FLEET DATA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available days |
|
|
22,817 |
|
|
|
19,219 |
|
Operating days |
|
|
22,745 |
|
|
|
19,198 |
|
Fleet utilization |
|
|
99.7 |
% |
|
|
99.9 |
% |
AVERAGE DAILY RESULTS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Time Charter Equivalents (including FFAs) |
|
$ |
46,278 |
|
|
$ |
32,216 |
|
Time Charter Equivalents (excluding FFAs) |
|
$ |
45,566 |
|
|
$ |
30,843 |
|
During the year ended December 31, 2008, there were 3,598 more available days as compared to
2007. This was due mainly to the increase in short term fleet available days by 4,248 days, which
was mitigated by a decrease of 650 days of owned and long term fleet available days mainly due to
the sale to Navios Partners of five owned vessels and two chartered-in vessels in November 2007.
Navios Holdings can increase or decrease its fleets size by chartering-in vessels for long or
short term periods (less than one year). Fleet size and the corresponding available days will
be decreased if charters are not renewed or replaced.
The average Time Charter Equivalent (TCE) rate excluding FFAs for the year ended December 31,
2008 was $45,566 per day, $14,723 per day higher than the rate achieved in 2007. This was primarily
due to the improvement in the freight market during the first nine months of 2008 compared to those
achieved during the same period in 2007. Although the rates deteriorated in the last three months
of 2008, this still resulted in higher average TCE rate for the year ended December 31, 2008
compared to that in 2007.
Revenue: Revenue increased to $1,246.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 as
compared to the $758.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2007. Navios Holdings earns revenue
from owned and chartered-in vessels, COAs and logistic business. Revenue from vessel operations
increased by $389.6 million, or 52.0%, to $1,138.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 as
compared to $748.7 million for the same period during 2007. This increase is mainly attributable to
the increase by 47.7% in TCE rates per day excluding FFAs in 2008 compared to 2007, and the
increase in the available days by 18.7% in 2008 compared to 2007.
Revenue from the logistics business was approximately $107.8 million for the year ended
December 31, 2008 as compared to $9.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2007. This is due to
the acquisition of the Horamar group in January 2008.
Gain on FFAs: Income from FFAs decreased by $10.2 million to a gain of $16.2 million during
the year ended December 31, 2008 as compared to
$26.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2007. Navios Holdings records the change in the fair value of derivatives at each balance
sheet date. The changes in fair values of the effective portion of FFAs qualifying for hedge
accounting, representing unrealized losses at December 31, 2008 and 2007, of $0 million and $19.9
million, respectively, were recorded in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income/(Loss) in the
stockholders equity while the unrealized gains or losses of the remaining FFAs not qualifying for
hedge accounting together with the ineffective portion of these qualifying for hedge accounting
were recorded in the statement of income under Gain/(Loss) on Forward Freight Agreements. The
gains/(losses) included in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income/(Loss) are reclassified to
earnings under Revenue in the statement of income in the same period or periods during which
the hedged forecasted transactions affect earnings. On this basis approximately $19.9 million and
$9.8 million losses have been reclassified to earnings for each of the years ended December 31,
2008 and 2007, respectively. The FFA market has experienced significant volatility in the past few
years and, accordingly, recognition of the changes in the fair value of FFAs has caused, and can
cause, significant volatility in earnings. The extent of the impact on earnings is dependent on two
factors: market conditions and Navios Holdings net position in the market. Market conditions were
volatile in both years. As an indicator of volatility, selected Baltic Exchange Panamax time
charter average rates are shown below.
60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Baltic Exchanges |
|
|
Panamax Time |
|
|
Charter Average |
|
|
Index |
January 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
31,719 |
(a) |
October 30, 2007 |
|
$ |
94,977 |
(b) |
May 20, 2008 |
|
$ |
91,710 |
(c) |
December 12, 2008 |
|
$ |
3,537 |
(d) |
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Low for fiscal year 2007. |
|
(b) |
|
High for fiscal year 2007. |
|
(c) |
|
High for fiscal year 2008. |
|
(d) |
|
Low for fiscal year 2008. |
Time Charter, Voyage and Logistic Business Expense: Time charter, voyage and logistic
business expenses increased by $508.6 million, or 91.2%, to $1,066.2 million for the year ended
December 31, 2008 as compared to $557.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2007. This was
primarily due to the increase in the market rates, particularly during the first nine months of 2008,
which negatively affected the charter-in daily hire rate cost for the long term chartered-in fleet
from $11,592 per day during the year ended December 31, 2007 to $15,107 per day for the same period
of 2008, the increase in the short term fleet activity (which also positively affected the
available days of the fleet, discussed above), as well as the acquisition of Horamar, which had a
further impact on the logistics business of $66.4 million.
Direct Vessel Expenses: Direct vessel expenses for operation of the owned fleet decreased
by $1.3 million to $26.6 million, or by 4.7%, for the year ended December 31, 2008 as compared to
$27.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2007. Direct vessel expenses include crew costs,
provisions, deck and engine stores, lubricating oils, insurance premiums, maintenance and repairs.
The decrease resulted primarily from the decrease in ownership days from 6,473 days during 2007 to
5,537 days during 2008 mainly due to the sale of five owned vessels to Navios Partners in November
2007.
General and Administrative Expenses: General and administrative expenses of Navios Holdings
are composed of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended |
|
Year ended |
(in thousands of U.S. dollars) |
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
December 31, 2007 |
Payroll and related costs(1) |
|
|
15,751 |
(2) |
|
|
12,174 |
|
Professional, legal and audit fees(1) |
|
|
4,775 |
|
|
|
5,975 |
|
Logistics business |
|
|
10,999 |
|
|
|
507 |
|
Credit risk insurance(1) |
|
|
4,053 |
|
|
|
421 |
|
Office expenses(1) |
|
|
2,862 |
|
|
|
2,003 |
|
Other(1) |
|
|
1,561 |
|
|
|
1,978 |
|
61
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Amounts do not include general and administrative expenses of the logistics business |
|
(2) |
|
Includes stock plan expenses |
The increase in general and administrative expenses of $16.9 million to $40.0 million, or by 73.2%,
for the year ended December 31, 2008, as compared to $23.1 million for the same period of 2007 is
mainly attributable to (a) $3.6 million increase in payroll and related costs in connection with
the expansion of Navios operations, including $2.1 million in stock plan expenses, (b) $10.5
million in general and administrative expenses attributable to the Logistics Business due to
acquisition of Horamar in January 2008, (c) expenses relating to credit risk insurance premium
which were incurred beginning in the fourth quarter of 2007 and (d) office expenses.
Depreciation and Amortization: For the year ended December 31, 2008, depreciation and
amortization increased by $25.2 million compared to the same period in 2007. The increase was
primarily due to the additional depreciation and amortization following the acquisition of Horamar
in January 2008, amounting to $16.7 million, as well as the increase in amortization of intangibles
by $9.0 million, mainly due to the expiration of unfavorable contracts which positively affected
amortization in the year ended December 31, 2007, and the increase in amortization of backlog by
$3.2 million. The above increase was mitigated by the decrease in depreciation of $3.9 million in
2008, due to the sale of five owned vessels to Navios Partners in the fourth quarter of 2007.
Provision for Losses on Accounts Receivable: During the year ended December 31, 2008,
Navios Holdings provided for $2.7 million relating to receivables of FFA trading counterparties.
Navios Holdings exposure to such counterparties as of December 31, 2008, was approximately $11.2
million. No amount has been charged to Navios Holdings statements of income in its 2007 financial
statements.
Interest Income from Investments in Finance Lease: Two of the vessels acquired through the
acquisition of Kleimar on February 2, 2007, Obeliks and Vanessa, have been leased out and qualified
as finance leases. The resulting interest income for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007
were $2.2 million and $3.5 million, respectively. This decrease was mainly due to the sale of
Obeliks on June 13, 2008.
Net Interest Expense and Income: Interest expense and finance cost for the year ended
December 31, 2008 decreased to $49.1 million, as compared to $51.1 million in the same period of
2007. This decrease was mainly due to the decrease in average LIBOR rate to 3.50% for the year
ended December 31, 2008 from 5.28% for the same period in 2007. This decrease was mitigated by an
increase (excluding Navios Logistics) in average outstanding loan balance from $320.9 million for
the year ended December 31, 2007 to $324.0 million in the same period of 2008 (excluding the
drawdowns relating to facilities for the construction of the Capesize vessels and the $90.0 million
revolving facility drawn in December 2008) and an increase in interest expense and finance cost
during the year ended December 31, 2008 of $4.4 million due to the outstanding loan balances of
Navios Logistics. Interest income decreased by $3.0 million to $7.8 million for the year ended
December 31, 2008, as compared to $10.8 million for the same period of 2007. This is mainly
attributable to the decrease in the average cash balances from $240.9 million in the year ended
December 31, 2007 to $229.8 million in the same period of 2008, and the decrease in interest rates.
Gain on Sale of Assets/Partial Sale of Subsidiary: The gain on sale of assets/partial sale
of subsidiary for the year ended December 31, 2008 was $27.8 million and related mainly to the
$24.9 million gain recognized from the sale of Navios Aurora I to Navios Partners on July 1, 2008,
$2.7 million gain recognized from the partial sale of CNSA to the minority shareholders of Navios
Logistics as part of the acquisition of Horamar in January 2008 and $0.2 million gain from the sale
of Obeliks in June 2008 mentioned above.
For the year ended December 31, 2007, the $167.5 million gain was related to the IPO of Navios
Partners, during which Navios Holdings sold the interests of its eight wholly-owned subsidiaries
having a net book value of $185.8 million in exchange for aggregate cash proceeds of $353.3
million.
62
Net Other Income and Expense: Net other expense increased by $10.0 million to $11.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2008,
from $1.6 million for the same period in 2007. This
increase was mainly due to $5.3 million of net unrealized losses on Navios Holdings investment in
Navios Acquisition sponsor warrants acquired as part of its IPO in July 2008, $0.8 million on the
interest rate swaps during 2008 compared to 2007, and recognition of a $1.5 million cancellation
fee relating to the cancellation of contracts to acquire three Capesize vessels. The remaining $2.4
million of additional losses relate mainly to miscellaneous expenses.
For the year ended December 31, 2007 compared to the year ended December 31, 2006
The following table presents consolidated revenue and expense information for each of the
years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 and was derived from the audited consolidated revenue and
expense accounts of Navios Holdings for each of the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended |
|
|
Year ended |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(in thousands of U.S. dollars) |
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
758,420 |
|
|
$ |
205,375 |
|
Gain on FFAs |
|
|
26,379 |
|
|
|
19,786 |
|
Time charter, voyage and logistic business expenses |
|
|
(557,573 |
) |
|
|
(84,225 |
) |
Direct vessel expenses |
|
|
(27,892 |
) |
|
|
(19,863 |
) |
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
(23,058 |
) |
|
|
(15,057 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(31,900 |
) |
|
|
(37,129 |
) |
Provision for losses on accounts receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,242 |
) |
Interest income from investments in finance lease |
|
|
3,507 |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
10,819 |
|
|
|
3,832 |
|
Interest expense and finance cost, net |
|
|
(51,089 |
) |
|
|
(47,429 |
) |
Gain on sale of assets |
|
|
167,511 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other income |
|
|
445 |
|
|
|
1,819 |
|
Other expense |
|
|
(2,046 |
) |
|
|
(472 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before equity in net earnings of affiliated
companies and joint venture |
|
|
273,523 |
|
|
|
20,395 |
|
Equity in net earnings of affiliated companies and
joint venture |
|
|
1,929 |
|
|
|
674 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before taxes |
|
|
275,452 |
|
|
|
21,069 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
(4,451 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
271,001 |
|
|
$ |
21,069 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Set forth below are selected historical and statistical data for Navios Holdings for each of
the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 that the Company believes may be useful in better
understanding the Companys financial position and results of operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
FLEET DATA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available days |
|
|
19,219 |
|
|
|
10,382 |
|
Operating days |
|
|
19,198 |
|
|
|
10,333 |
|
Fleet utilization |
|
|
99.9 |
% |
|
|
99.5 |
% |
AVERAGE DAILY RESULTS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Time Charter Equivalents (including FFAs) |
|
$ |
32,216 |
|
|
$ |
18,812 |
|
Time Charter Equivalents (excluding FFAs) |
|
$ |
30,843 |
|
|
$ |
16,906 |
|
63
During the year ended December 31, 2007, there were 8,837 more available days as compared to
2006. This was due to the acquisition of Kleimar in February 2007 which resulted in 6,000
additional days, the increase of the chartered-in fleet resulting in 2,124 additional days, and the
increase in the ownership days by 713 additional days. Navios Holdings has been able to increase or
decrease its fleets size by chartering-in vessels for long or short term periods (less than one
year). Fleet size and the corresponding available days will be decreased if charters are not
renewed or replaced.
The average Time Charter Equivalent (TCE) rate excluding FFAs for the year ended December 31,
2007 was $30,843 per day, $13,937 per day higher than the rate achieved in 2006. This was primarily
due to the improvement in the freight market resulting in higher charter-out daily rates during
2007 than those achieved during 2006 and the Capesize vessels acquired as part of the acquisition
of Kleimar (Capesize Baltic Exchanges time charter average index as of December 24, 2007 was
$157,128 per day compared to the respective Panamax index which was $66,716 per day).
Revenue: Revenue increased to $758.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 as
compared to the $205.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2006. Navios Holdings earns revenue
from both owned and chartered-in vessels, contracts of affreightment and the port terminal
operations. Revenues from vessel operations increased by approximately $552.0 million, or by
280.6%, to $748.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 from $196.7 for the year ended
December 31, 2006. This increase was mainly attributable to the increase by 82.4% in TCE rate per
day excluding FFAs in 2007 compared to the same period in 2006, and the increase in the available
days by 85.1% in 2007 compared to the same period in 2006.
Revenues from the port terminal increased by $1.0 million to $9.7 million for the year ended
December 31, 2007 as compared to $8.7 million in 2006. Port terminal throughput volume increased by
approximately 11.7% to 2.48 million tons of agricultural and other products for the year ended
December 31, 2007 from 2.22 million tons for the year ended December 31, 2006.
Gain on FFAs: Income from FFAs increased by $6.6 million to a gain of $26.4 million during
the year ended December 31, 2007 as compared to $19.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2006.
Navios Holdings records the change in the fair value of derivatives at each balance sheet date. The
changes in fair values of the effective portion of FFAs qualifying for hedge accounting,
representing unrealized losses at December 31, 2007 and 2006, of $19.9 million and $9.8 million,
respectively were recorded in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income/(Loss) in the
stockholders equity while the unrealized gains or losses of the remaining FFAs not qualifying for
hedge accounting together with the ineffective portion of these qualifying for hedge accounting of
$2.9 million and $4.0 million losses for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively,
were recorded in the statement of income under Gain/(Loss) on Forward Freight Agreements. The
gains/(losses) included in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income/(Loss) are reclassified to
earnings under Revenue in the statement of income in the same period or periods during which
the hedged forecasted transactions affect earnings. On this basis, approximately $9.8 million and
$4.2 million have been reclassified to earnings for each of the years ended December 31, 2007 and
2006, respectively. The FFA market has experienced significant volatility in the past few years
and, accordingly, recognition of the changes in the fair value of FFAs has, and can, cause
significant volatility in earnings. The extent of the impact on earnings is dependent on two
factors: market conditions and Navios Holdings net position in the market. Market conditions were
volatile in both years. As an indicator of volatility, selected Baltic Exchange Panamax time
charter average rates are shown below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Baltic Exchanges |
|
|
Panamax Time |
|
|
Charter Average |
|
|
Index |
January 26, 2006 |
|
$ |
13,267 |
(a) |
December 6, 2006 |
|
$ |
35,713 |
(b) |
January 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
31,719 |
(c) |
October 30, 2007 |
|
$ |
94,977 |
(d) |
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Low for fiscal year 2006. |
|
(b) |
|
High for fiscal year 2006. |
|
(c) |
|
Low for fiscal year 2007. |
|
(d) |
|
High for fiscal year 2007. |
64
Time Charter, Voyage and Logistic Business Expense: Time charter, voyage and logistic
business expenses increased by $473.4 million, or by 562.2%, to $557.6 million for the year ended
December 31, 2007 as compared to $84.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2006. This was
primarily due to the higher charter-in expenses relating to the Capesize vessels (Capesize Baltic
Exchanges time charter average index as of December 24, 2007 was $157,128 per day compared to the
respective Panamax index which was $66,716 per day) and servicing the related COA business
following the acquisition of Kleimar in February 2007. The charter-in daily hire rate cost for the
long term chartered-in fleet (excluding Kleimars vessels) increased from $9,480 during 2006 to
$9,560 for the same period in 2007.
Direct Vessel Expenses: Direct vessel expenses for operation of the owned fleet increased
by $8.0 million to $27.9 million or by 40.2% for the year ended December 31, 2007 as compared to
$19.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2006. Direct vessel expenses include crew costs,
provisions, deck and engine stores, lubricating oils, insurance premiums, maintenance and repairs.
The increase resulted primarily due to the increase in ownership days from 5,504 days during 2006
to 6,473 days during 2007.
General and Administrative Expenses: General and administrative expense increased by
$8.0 million, or 53.0%, to $23.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 as compared to
$15.1 million for the same period in 2006. This increase was mainly attributable to: (a) $3.5
million increase in general and administrative expenses relating to Kleimar; (b) $3.0 million
increase in wages and salaries due to increase in bonuses and the share based compensation expenses
relating to the stock plan, (c) $0.8 million increases in professional, legal, and audit fees; (d)
$0.3 million increase in office expenses and utilities; and (e) $0.4 million increase in promotion
expenses.
Depreciation and Amortization: For the year ended December 31, 2007, the $5.2 million
decrease in depreciation and amortization compared to the same period in 2006 was attributable
mainly to the $4.8 million net positive amortization of intangible assets and liabilities
associated with the acquisition of Kleimar as well as the decline in the amortization of intangible
assets due to the transfer of the unamortized balance of favorable leases to vessel cost upon
exercise of purchase options. This decrease was mitigated by the increase in depreciation mainly
due to the acquisition of two vessels. See further discussion of Navios Holdings amortization
policy under Operating Results and Critical Accounting Policies.
Provision for Losses on Accounts Receivable: On November 30, 2006, we received notification
that one of our FFA trading counterparties filed for bankruptcy in Canada. Navios Holdings exposure
to such counterparty as of December 31, 2006, was approximately $7.7 million. While it is too early
to determine what recovery Navios Holdings may obtain in any liquidation proceeding, it provided
$5.4 million in its 2006 financial statements. No additional amount was provided for in its 2007
financial statements.
Interest Income from Investments in Finance Lease: Two of the vessels acquired through the
acquisition of Kleimar, Obeliks and Vanessa, have been leased out and qualified as finance leases.
The resulting interest income for the year ended December 31, 2007 was $3.5 million.
Net Interest Expense and Income: Interest expense and finance cost increased by $3.7
million to $51.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 as compared to $47.4 million for the
same period in 2006. The increase was mainly due to the loans assumed following the acquisition of
Kleimar and the bank secured facilities obtained to partially finance the acquisitions of new
vessels and Kleimar and the issuance of $300.0 million senior notes. This increase was mitigated by
the decrease in finance costs due to the write-off of deferred finance costs in 2006. Interest
income increased by $7.0 million to $10.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 as compared
to $3.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2006 mainly due to the increase in average cash
balances from $88.2 million in 2006 to $240.9 million in 2007.
Gain on Sale of Assets: On November 16, 2007, following the IPO of Navios Partners, Navios
Holdings sold the interests of its eight wholly-owned subsidiaries
having a net book value of $185.8 million in exchange for aggregate cash proceeds of $353.3 million. The gain resulting
from the above transaction was $167.5 million.
65
Net Other Income and expense: Net other income decreased by $3.0 million to $1.6 million
net other expense for the year ended December 31, 2007 from $1.4 million net other income for the
same period in 2006. This decrease is mainly due to unfavorable marked to market losses of $1.3
million realized on the interest rate swaps during 2007, as well as the reversals of provisions for
arbitration claims against Navios Holdings that had been concluded in Navios Holdings favor in
2006.
Navios South American Logistics Inc.
The following is a discussion of the financial condition and results of operations for the
year ended December 31, 2008 of Navios Logistics. The comparatives used in this discussion for
Navios Logistics year ended December 31, 2008 are for both balance sheet and profit and loss
purposes CNSA figures of the respective periods presented. All of these financial statements have
been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP.
Recent Developments
Assets Acquisition:
In July 2008, Navios Logistics took delivery of a tanker vessel named Estefania H. The
purchase price of the vessel (including direct costs) amounted to approximately $19.9 million.
Navios Logistics expects to take delivery of two handysize tankers, Makenita and Malva II, in
the second and the fourth quarters of 2009, respectively.
As of September 2008, Navios Logistics had acquired a fleet of liquid and dry barges and push
boats for transporting dry and liquid cargo on the river in the Hidrovia Region, representing six
convoys. The total cost of the acquisition including transportation costs amounted to approximately
$72.1 million. The acquisition was financed by a loan of $70.0 million with Marfin Egnatia
Bank S.A. at a rate of LIBOR plus a margin of 175 basis points repayable in full by March
2011,which was transferred to Marfin Popular Bank Public Co. Ltd in March 2009. The loan was
transferred under the same terms except for an increase in margin to 275 bps.
Following the above mentioned investment, Navios Logistics now controls a fleet of 240 barges,
push boats, and other vessels, as well as 2 docking platforms.
In September 2008, Navios Logistics began construction of a new silo at its port facilities in
Uruguay. This is expected to be fully operational by the second
quarter of 2009 in time for the new crop season and
it will add an additional of 80,000 metric tons storage capacity. As of December 31, 2008, Navios
Logistics had paid $ 4.8 million for the construction of the new silo.
Factors affecting Navios Logistics results of operations
Charter and freight rates
The industrys current charter and freight rates have decreased from their historic highs
reached in the second quarter of 2008. If shipping industry, which has been highly cyclical, is
depressed even more in the future Navios Logistics earnings and available cash flow may be
adversely affected. We cannot assure you that we will be able to successfully charter Navios
Logistics vessels in the future, renew its existing charters or arrange the proper voyages at
rates sufficient to allow us to operate Navios Logistics business profitably, to meet its
obligations, including payment of debt service to its lenders. Navios Logistics ability to renew
the charters on its vessels on the expiration or termination of current charters or contract the
most suitable voyages for its fleet in order to have a full utilization of its vessels, barges and
push boats will depend upon, among other things, economic conditions in the sectors in which the
vessels, barges and push boats operate at that time, changes in the supply and demand for vessels,
barges and push boats capacity and changes in the supply and demand for the transportation of
commodities. See also Item 3.D Risk Factors included
elsewhere in this Annual Report.
66
Weather
Conditions
For Navios Logistics vessels, barges and push boats business, demand for services is driven
mainly by products such as iron, grain and oil. Droughts and other adverse weather conditions,
could result in a decline in production of the agricultural products Navios Logistics transports,
and this could likely result in a reduction in demand for services. As Navios Logistics specializes
in the transport and storage of liquid cargoes and the transport of dry bulk cargoes along the
Hidrovia passing through Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Paraguay and Uruguay, any changes adversely
affecting any of these regions, such as low water levels, could reduce or limit Navios Logistics
ability to effectively transport cargo. See also Item 3.D Risk Factors included
elsewhere in this Annual Report.
Foreign currency transactions
For the year ended December 31, 2008, 88% of Navios Logistics revenues were denominated in
U.S. dollars, and 12% were denominated in Argentinean Pesos and Paraguayan Guaranies. However, 52%
of total revenue was collected in Argentinean Pesos or Paraguayan Guaranies.
Navios Logistics operating results, which are reported in U.S. dollars, may be affected by
fluctuations in the exchange rate between the U.S. dollar and other currencies. For accounting
purposes, Navios Logistics uses U.S. dollars as its functional currency. Therefore, revenue and
expense accounts are translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rate in effect at the date of
each transaction.
Inflation and fuel price increases
The impact of inflation and the resulting pressure on prices in the South American countries
in which Navios Logistics operates may not be fully neutralized by equivalent adjustments in the
rate of exchange between the local currencies and the U.S. Dollar. Specifically for its vessels,
barges and push boats business, Navios Logistics negotiated, and will continue to negotiate, fuel
price adjustment clauses, although in some cases prices that it pays for fuel are temporarily not
in compliance with the adjustment that it obtains under its freight contracts.
Seasonality
One significant factor that affects Navios Logistics results of operations and revenues from
quarter to quarter is seasonality. Generally, the high season for the vessels, barges and push
boats operations is the period between February and July, as a result of the South American
harvest and higher river levels. Expected growth in soy and minerals production and transportation
may offset part of this seasonality. During the South American summer time, mainly from November to
January, the low level of water in the North of the Hidrovia could affect adversely Navios
Logistics operations. With respect to Navios Logistics port terminal operations in Uruguay, high
season is mainly from April to September, linked with the arrival of the first barges down-river
and with the sea-vessels logistic operations. The port terminal operations in Paraguay are not
affected by seasonality as the operations of the port are linked mainly to petroleum products. See also Item 3.D Risk Factors included
elsewhere in this Annual Report.
Financial highlights
The following table presents consolidated revenue and expense information of Navios Logistics
for the year ended December 31, 2008 and of CNSA for the year ended December 31, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CNSA |
|
|
|
Year ended |
|
|
Year ended |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
107,778 |
|
|
$ |
9,689 |
|
Time charter, voyage and port terminal expenses |
|
|
(70,268 |
) |
|
|
(3,860 |
) |
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
(10,999 |
) |
|
|
(507 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(18,562 |
) |
|
|
(1,867 |
) |
Interest income |
|
|
502 |
|
|
|
148 |
|
67
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CNSA |
|
|
|
Year ended |
|
|
Year ended |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Interest expense and finance cost, net |
|
|
(4,421 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other income |
|
|
948 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Other expense |
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
(644 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before Taxes and minority interests |
|
$ |
4,952 |
|
|
$ |
2,963 |
|
Income Taxes |
|
|
(981 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before minority interests |
|
|
3,971 |
|
|
|
2,963 |
|
Minority interests |
|
|
(544 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
3,427 |
|
|
$ |
2,963 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents consolidated balance sheets of Navios Logistics as of December
31, 2008 and of CNSA as of December 31, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CNSA |
|
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars) |
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
11,516 |
|
|
$ |
7,350 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
1,050 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
13,864 |
|
|
|
294 |
|
Due from affiliate companies |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
Short term backlog asset |
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
175 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
6,041 |
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
32,556 |
|
|
|
7,944 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vessels, port terminal and other fixed assets, net |
|
|
250,237 |
|
|
|
24,970 |
|
Deferred financing costs, net |
|
|
420 |
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred dry dock and special survey costs, net |
|
|
1,433 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other long term assets |
|
|
9,535 |
|
|
|
|
|
Long term backlog asset |
|
|
|
|
|
|
44 |
|
Intangible assets other than goodwill |
|
|
84,957 |
|
|
|
29,179 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
91,393 |
|
|
|
14,571 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-current assets |
|
|
437,975 |
|
|
|
68,764 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
470,531 |
|
|
$ |
76,708 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
10,165 |
|
|
|
600 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
9,058 |
|
|
|
|
|
Intercompany accounts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,924 |
|
Current portion of long term debt |
|
|
3,137 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
22,360 |
|
|
|
6,524 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long term debt, net of current portion |
|
|
78,191 |
|
|
|
|
|
Unfavorable lease terms |
|
|
1,505 |
|
|
|
|
|
Long term liabilities |
|
|
22,181 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
Deferred tax liability |
|
|
26,573 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-current liabilities |
|
|
128,450 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
150,810 |
|
|
|
6,559 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interest |
|
|
31,512 |
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock $1 par value, authorized 20,000 shares |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
284,762 |
|
|
|
19,553 |
|
Legal reserves |
|
|
|
|
|
|
820 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
3,427 |
|
|
|
49,740 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
288,209 |
|
|
|
70,149 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
470,531 |
|
|
$ |
76,708 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period over Period Comparisons
Navios Logistics organizes its business using the following two main operating activities:
vessel, barge and push boat operations and port terminal operations.
68
For the year ended December 31, 2008 compared to the year ended December 31, 2007
Revenue: For the year ended December 31, 2008 Navios Logistics revenue increased by $98.1
million to $107.8 million as compared to $9.7 million for the same period during 2007. Revenue from
port terminal operations amounted to $21.7 million and revenue from vessels, barges and push boats
amounted to $86.1 million. The main reason for the increase was the acquisition of Horamar in
January 2008 which contributed $97.3 million of revenues for the year ended December 31, 2008,
while the rest was due to the increase in revenue of CNSA by $0.8 million to $10.5 million for the
year ended December 31, 2008 compared to $9.7 million for the same period in 2007.
Time Charter, Voyage and Port Terminal Expenses: Time charter, voyage and port terminal
expenses for the year ended December 31, 2008 increased by $66.4 million to $70.3 million as
compared to $3.9 million for the same period during 2007. Port terminal expenses for the year ended
December 31, 2008 amounted to $14.2 million while the remaining $56.1 million related to time
charter, voyage expenses of vessels, barges and push boats. The main reason for the increase was
the acquisition of Horamar which resulted in an increase of $65.8 million and the increase in CNSA
expenses by $0.6 million to $4.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2008, as compared to $3.9
million for the same period in 2007 which is attributable to an increase in employee salaries and
other port operational costs.
General and Administrative Expenses: General and administrative expenses increased by $10.5
million to $11.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 as compared to $0.5 million for the
same period during 2007. General and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2008
relating to port terminal operations amounted to $1.1 million while the remaining amount of $9.9
million relates to general and administrative expenses from vessels, barges and push boats
operations. The main reason for the increase was the acquisition of Horamar which resulted in an
increase of $10.2 million and the increase in CNSA general and administrative expenses by $0.3
million to $0.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2008, as compared to $0.5 million for the
same period in 2007, which is attributable to an increase in employee salaries and increase in
legal and audit fees.
Depreciation and Amortization: Depreciation and amortization expense increased by $16.7
million to $18.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2008, as compared to $1.9 million for the
same period of 2007. Depreciation of tangible assets amounted to $15.3 million and amortization of
intangible assets amounted to $3.3 million. The increase of $16.7 million in depreciation and
amortization expense was due to purchase price allocation adjustments following the acquisition of
Horamar.
Net Interest Expense and Income: Interest expense and finance costs, net increased by $4.4
million for the year ended December 31, 2008 as compared to $0 million for the year ended December
31, 2007. Interest expense amounted to $3.9 million and the remaining $0.5 million due to various
finance costs. The main reason for the increase was the debt assumed following the acquisition of
Horamar and the $70.0 million loan with Marfin Egnatia Bank concluded in March 2008, which
contributed to the total increase. In 2007, there was no loan outstanding, and therefore, there was
no interest expense.
Interest income increased by $0.4 million to $0.5 million for the year ended December
31, 2008, as compared to $0.1 million for the same period in 2007 and is mainly attributable to
interest income resulting from the acquisition of Horamar.
Net Other Income and Expense: Net other income increased by $1.5 million for the year ended
December 31, 2008, as compared to $0.6 million net other expense for the year ended December 31,
2007. This increase is mainly attributable to the acquisition of Horamar.
Income Taxes: Income taxes, net increased by $1.0 million for the year ended December 31,
2008, as compared to $0 million for the same period in 2007. The main reason for the increase was
the acquisition of Horamar. Income taxes consist of income taxes calculated for certain
subsidiaries of Navios South American Logistics, which are subject to corporate income tax.
EBITDA: EBITDA represents net income before interest, income taxes, depreciation and
amortization. Navios Logistics uses EBITDA because Navios Logistics believes that EBITDA is a basis
upon which operational performance can be assessed and because Navios Logistics believes that
EBITDA presents useful information to investors regarding Navios Logistics ability to service
and/or incur indebtedness. Navios Logistics also uses EBITDA: (i) by prospective and current lessors as
well as potential lenders to evaluate potential transactions; and (ii) to evaluate and price
potential acquisition candidates.
69
EBITDA Reconciliation to Net Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended |
|
|
CNSA |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
Year ended |
|
(expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars) |
|
2008 |
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
3,427 |
|
|
$ |
2,963 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
18,562 |
|
|
|
1,867 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
4,421 |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
(502 |
) |
|
|
(148 |
) |
Income taxes |
|
|
981 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA |
|
$ |
26,889 |
|
|
$ |
4,682 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA increased by $22.2 million to $26.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2008, as
compared to $4.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2007. The increase is mainly attributable
to (a) the increase in revenue by $98.1 million to $107.8 million for the year ended December
31, 2008, as compared to $9.7 million for the same period during 2007 and (b) the increase in other
income by $1.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 as compared to $0 million for the same
period in 2007. The above increase was mitigated mainly by (a) the increase in time charter, voyage
expenses and port terminal expenses by $66.4 million from $3.9 million for the year ended December
31, 2007 to $70.3 million in the same period of 2008 and (b) the increase in general and
administrative expenses by $10.5 million to $11.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2008, as
compared to $0.5 million for the same period during 2007.
Balance Sheet highlights
Investing activities
On July 25, 2008, Navios Logistics took delivery of a tanker vessel named Estefania H. The
purchase price of the vessel (including direct costs) amounted to approximately $19.9 million.
Until September 2008, Navios Logistics acquired a fleet of liquid and dry barges and push
boats for transporting dry and liquid cargo on the river in the Hidrovia Region, representing six
convoys. The total cost of the acquisition including transportation costs amounted to approximately
$72.1 million.
Through September 2008, Navios Logistics began construction of a new silo at its port
facilities in Uruguay. As of December 31, 2008, Navios Logistics had paid $ 4.8 million for the
construction of the new silo.
Financing activities
On March 31, 2008, Nauticler S.A. entered into a $70.0 million loan facility with Marfin
Egnatia Bank for the purpose of providing Nauticler S.A. with investment capital to finance the
acquisition of the six convoys discussed above. The loan is repayable in one installment by 2011
and bears interest at LIBOR plus 1.75%. The debt issuance costs relating to the new credit facility
amounted to $0.5 million.
Purchase Accounting
On January 1, 2008, pursuant to a share purchase agreement, Navios Holdings contributed (a)
$112.2 million in cash and (b) the authorized capital stock of its wholly-owned subsidiary CNSA in
exchange for the issuance and delivery of 12,765 shares of Navios Logistics, representing 63.8%
(67.2% excluding 1,007 shares of contingent consideration) of its outstanding stock. Navios
Logistics acquired all ownership interests in Horamar in exchange for (a) $112.2 million in cash, of
which $5.0 million were kept in escrow payable upon the attainment of certain EBITDA targets during
specified periods through December 2008 (the EBITDA Adjustment) and (b) the issuance of 7,235
shares of Navios Logistics representing 36.2% (32.8% excluding 1,007 shares of contingent
consideration) of Navios Logistics outstanding stock, of which 1,007 shares were kept in escrow
pending the EBITDA Adjustment.
70
In November 2008, part of the contingent consideration for the acquisition of Horamar was
released, as Horamar achieved the interim EBITDA target. Following the resolution of the
contingency, $2.5 million in cash and 503 shares were released to the shareholders of Horamar.
Following this release, Navios Holdings owns 65.5% (excluding 504 shares still kept in escrow at
December 31, 2008, pending achievement of final EBITDA adjustment) of the outstanding common stock
of Navios Logistics. In accordance with the amended share purchase agreement, the final EBITDA
target may be resolved until June 30, 2009.
The acquisition was accounted for under the purchase method in accordance with SFAS 141.
Horamars assets and liabilities were revalued to 100% of their respective fair values. CNSAs
assets and liabilities were recorded at carryover basis, reflecting the common control nature of
the transaction.
Goodwill arising from the acquisition has all been allocated to the Navios Holdings Logistics
Business segment. None of the goodwill is deductible for tax purposes.
Non-Guarantor Subsidiary
Our non-guarantor subsidiary, Navios Logistics, accounted for approximately $107.8 million, or
8.7% of our total revenue, $2.2 million, or 1.9%, of our net income (after deducting the minority
interest) and approximately $28.5 million, or 17.2%, of Adjusted EBITDA, in each case for the year
ended December 31, 2008, as compared to $9.7 million, or 1.3% of our total revenue, $3.0 million,
or 1.1%, of our net income and approximately $4.7 million, or 1.3%, of Adjusted EBITDA, in each
case for the year ended December 31, 2007, and to $8.7 million, or 4.3%, of our total revenue, $2.8
million, or 13.4%, of our net income and approximately $4.7 million, or 4.6%, of Adjusted EBITDA,
in each case for the year ended December 31, 2006.
B. Liquidity and Capital Resources
Navios Holdings has historically financed its capital requirements with cash flows from
operations, equity contributions from stockholders and bank loans. Main uses of funds have been
capital expenditures for the acquisition of new vessels, new construction and upgrades at the port
terminal, expenditures incurred in connection with ensuring that the owned vessels comply with
international and regulatory standards, repayments of bank loans and payments of dividends. Navios
Holdings anticipates that cash on hand, internally generated cash flows and borrowings under the
existing credit facilities will be sufficient to fund the operations of the fleet and the logistics
business, including working capital requirements. However, see Exercise of Vessel Purchase
Options, Working Capital Position and Long Term Debt Obligations and Credit Arrangements
for further discussion of Navios Holdings working capital position.
In November 2008, the Board of Directors approved a share repurchase program of up to
$25.0 million of Navios Holdings common stock pursuant to a program adopted under Rule 10b5-1
under the Securities Exchange Act, as amended. The program does not require any minimum purchase or
any specific number or amount of shares and may be suspended or reinstated at any time in Navios
Holdings discretion and without notice. Repurchases are subject to restrictions under the terms of
our credit facilities and senior notes.
The following table presents cash flow information for each of the years ended December 31,
2008, 2007 and 2006.
71
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Net cash (used in)
/ provided by
operating
activities |
|
$ |
(28,388 |
) |
|
$ |
128,075 |
|
|
$ |
56,432 |
|
Net cash used in
investing
activities |
|
|
(452,637 |
) |
|
|
(16,451 |
) |
|
|
(111,463 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided
by financing
activities |
|
|
187,082 |
|
|
|
216,285 |
|
|
|
116,952 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Decrease) increase
in cash and cash
equivalents |
|
|
(293,943 |
) |
|
|
327,909 |
|
|
|
61,921 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash
equivalents,
beginning of the
period |
|
|
427,567 |
|
|
|
99,658 |
|
|
|
37,737 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash
equivalents, end of
period |
|
$ |
133,624 |
|
|
$ |
427,567 |
|
|
$ |
99,658 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash used in operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2008 as compared to the cash
provided for the year ended December 31, 2007:
Net cash from operating activities decreased by $156.5 million to $28.4 million cash used in
operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2008 as compared to $128.1 million cash
provided by operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2007. In determining net cash from
operating activities, net income is adjusted for the gain on sale of assets and effects of certain
non-cash items including depreciation and amortization, deferred taxes and unrealized gains and
losses on derivatives which may be analyzed in detail as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
118,527 |
|
|
$ |
271,001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
(used in)/ provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
57,062 |
|
|
|
31,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization and write-off of deferred financing cost |
|
|
2,077 |
|
|
|
1,856 |
|
Amortization of deferred dry dock costs |
|
|
1,933 |
|
|
|
1,687 |
|
Provision for losses on accounts receivable |
|
|
2,668 |
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized (gain)/loss on FFA derivatives |
|
|
8,220 |
|
|
|
(12,232 |
) |
Unrealized loss on warrants |
|
|
5,282 |
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized (gain)/loss on interest rate swaps |
|
|
1,874 |
|
|
|
1,279 |
|
Share based compensation |
|
|
2,694 |
|
|
|
566 |
|
Gains on sale of assets/partial sale of subsidiary |
|
|
(27,817 |
) |
|
|
(167,511 |
) |
Deferred taxes |
|
|
(56,113 |
) |
|
|
4,451 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings in affiliates and joint ventures, net of
dividends received |
|
|
(4,517 |
) |
|
|
(1,251 |
) |
Minority interest |
|
|
1,723 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net income adjusted for non-cash items |
|
|
113,613 |
|
|
|
131,746 |
|
The net fair value of open FFA trades as included in the balance sheet at December 31, 2008,
was higher than in the same period of 2007 and amounted to $15.5 million and $10.4 million
respectively, reflecting the marked-to-market values at the end of the respective years.
The liability for derivative accounts decreased during the year ended December 31, 2008 by
$167.3 million due to movement in the unrealized component of
NOS ASA and LCH portfolios, directly affecting the cash flow statement, changing from a $81.6 million gain to a $83.4
million loss and the payments relating to interest rate swaps of $2.3 million.
72
Restricted cash decreased by $65.8 million from $83.7 million at December 31, 2007 to
$17.9 million at December 31, 2008. The primary reason was the decrease in deposits made to NOS ASA
and LCH in 2008 with respect to FFAs trading by $34.5 million and $31.4 million, respectively, due
to the decrease in the number of trades with NOS ASA and LCH at year end 2008 compared with the
same period in 2007.
Accounts receivable, net increased by $4.8 million from $105.0 million at December 31, 2007 to
$109.8 million at December 31, 2008 (including receivables as a result of the acquisition of
Horamar amounting to $9.7 million). The primary reason was the increase in accounts receivable
relating to logistics business of $13.7 million. This increase was mitigated by the change in the
amount receivable from FFA trading partners which decreased by $5.3 million from $59.0 million at
December 31, 2007 to $53.7 million at December 31, 2008 and a decrease in all other receivable
categories by $3.6 million.
Prepaid expenses and other current assets decreased by $12.8 million from $41.1 million at
December 31, 2007 to $28.3 million at December 31, 2008 (including prepaid expenses and other
current assets obtained as a result of the acquisition of Horamar amounting to $3.4 million). The
main reason was the decrease in inventories of $2.3 million, the decrease in prepaid voyage and
operating costs of $16.0 million and the net decrease in other assets of $0.6 million. This
decrease was mitigated by an increase in claims receivables of $6.1 million.
Accounts payable decreased by $34.2 million from $106.7 million at December 31, 2007 to
$72.5 million at December 31, 2008 (including accounts payable obtained as a result of the
acquisition of Horamar amounting to $7.4 million). The primary reasons were the change in the
amount due to FFA trading partners, which decreased by $43.6 million during the year ended December
31, 2008, and the decrease by $4.2 million in bunkers and lubricants suppliers. This decrease was
mitigated by an increase of $10.2 million in accounts payable relating to logistics business due to
acquisition of Horamar, the increase in head owners payables by $2.7 million and the increase in
other suppliers and brokers by $0.7 million.
Accrued expenses decreased by $3.4 million to $34.5 million at December 31, 2008 (including
accrued expenses obtained as a result of the acquisition of Horamar amounting to $6.0 million) from
$37.9 million at December 31, 2007. The primary reason was the decrease of the provision by $10.1
million for losses on voyage in progress compared to the same period in 2007 and the decrease in
consultancy and legal fees by $2.5 million. The above decrease was mitigated by an increase in
taxes payable of $2.3 million due to the acquisition of Horamar, an increase in accrued interest of
$3.3 million, an increase in accrued voyage expenses by $3.0 million and a $0.6 million increase in
all other categories.
Deferred income primarily reflects freight and charter-out amounts collected on voyages that
have not been completed and the current portion of the deferred gain from the sale of Navios Aurora
I to Navios Partners to be amortized over the next year amounting to $1.2 million. Deferred freight
decreased by $11.2 million and deferred hire decreased by $10.0 million as a result of the decrease
in the number of voyages extending over the period end.
Cash used in investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2008 as compared to the year
ended December 31, 2007:
Cash used in investing activities was $452.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2008, or
an increase of $436.1 million from $16.5 million for the same period in 2007.
Cash used in investing activities was the result of (a) the payment of $110.1 million (net of
acquired cash of $5.6 million) for the acquisition of Horamar, (b) the acquisition of the vessels
Navios Orbiter, Navios Aurora I and Navios Ulysses amounting to $118.8 million, (c) the deposits on
vessel acquisitions amounting to $197.9 million relating mainly to the deposits for the eight
Capesize vessels to be delivered in various dates until the fourth quarter of 2009 and the two
Ultra Handymaxes, delivered on October 10, 2008 and on February 18, 2009, and (d) the purchase of
other fixed assets amounting to $100.8 million mainly relating to the acquisition of tanker
vessels, barges and push boats. The above was offset by $4.8 million received in connection with
the finance lease receivable, the proceeds of $35.1 million from the sale of Obeliks and $35.0 million cash proceeds from the
sale of Navios Aurora I to Navios Partners.
73
Cash used in investing activities was $16.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2007.
This was the result of the payment of $145.4 million (net of acquired cash of $22.1 million), for
the acquisition of Kleimar, the acquisition of Navios Hyperion amounting to $18.4 million, the
payment of $26.1 million for the acquisition of the 50% of White Narcissus S.A., the vessel owning
company of 50% of the vessel Navios Asteriks, the payment of $182.8 million as deposits for the
acquisition of Capesize vessels, the deposit of $5.5 million in restricted accounts in connection
with the acquisition of Navios Orbiter and Fantastiks and the purchase of property plant and
equipment amounting to $0.6 million. The above was offset by $9.0 million received in connection
with the capital lease receivable and by $353.3 million of aggregate cash proceeds from the sale of
eight of Navios Holdings wholly-owned subsidiaries to Navios Partners.
Cash provided by financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2008 as compared to the year
ended December 31, 2007:
Cash provided by financing activities was $187.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2008,
as compared to $216.3 million for the same period of 2007.
Cash provided by financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2008 was the result of
$119.8 million in loan proceeds (net of relating finance fees of $2.3 million) in connection with
the loan facility of Nauticler S.A. of $70.0 million, the loan facilities with DNB NOR BANK ASA of
$18.0 million and Emporiki Bank of Greece of $34.1 million for the construction of four Capesize
vessels, $90.0 million drawdown from the new revolving facility with Marfin Egnatia Bank,
$102.7 million drawdowns from the available HSH revolving facility, and $6.7 million of cash
proceeds relating to the issuance of common stock through exercise of warrants. This was offset by
(a) the acquisition of treasury stock amounting to $51.0 million, (b) the $52.6 million repayment
of Navios Holdings outstanding debt, and (c) $28.6 million of dividends paid.
Cash provided by financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2007 was the result of
(a) the proceeds of approximately $114.7 million relating to share capital increases due to
exercise of warrants, (b) the net proceeds of approximately $124.9 million relating to the increase
in share capital through a secondary public offering, (c) the net proceeds from Emporiki Bank of
Greece of $16.6 million and (d) the proceeds from a new secured credit facility which is composed
of a $280.0 million Term Loan Facility and a $120.0 million reducing Revolving Credit Facility. The
above increase was offset by a $136.0 million installments paid in connection with the Companys
credit facilities and $26.0 million of dividends paid.
Cash provided by operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2007 and the year ended
December 31, 2006
Net cash provided by operating activities increased by $71.7 million to $128.1 million for the
year ended December 31, 2007, as compared to $56.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2006.
The increase resulted primarily from the substantially higher net income in the year ended December
31, 2007 and other factors as discussed below. In determining net cash provided by operating
activities, net income is adjusted for the gain on sale of assets to Navios Partners and the
effects of certain non-cash items including depreciation and amortization and unrealized gains and
losses on derivatives.
The net fair value of open FFA trades as included in the balance sheet at December 31, 2007
was higher than in the same period of 2006 and amounted to $10.4 million and $9.0 million,
respectively, reflecting the marked-to-market values at the end of the respective years. Unrealized
gains from FFAs for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 amounted to $12.2 million and $12.5
million, respectively, and reflected the change in net fair value on open FFA contracts between the
years. The $12.2 million gain at December 31, 2007 represents $32.1 million in unrealized gain on
FFAs not qualifying for hedge accounting treatment charged to period results, which offsets the
$19.9 million loss on FFAs qualifying for hedge accounting which has been reflected in Other
Comprehensive Income/(Loss) under stockholders equity.
The liability for derivative accounts increased during the year ended December 31, 2007 by
$70.4 million due to movement in the unrealized component of NOS
ASA and LCH portfolios, changing from a $11.5 million gain to a $81.6 million gain and the receipts from interest rate
swaps of $0.3 million.
74
Restricted cash increased by $67.5 million from $16.2 million at December 31, 2006 to
$83.7 million at December 31, 2007. The primary reasons for this increase were the additional
deposits made to NOS ASA and LCH in 2007 with respect to FFAs trading of $27.0 million and $36.0
million respectively, and the increase in the retention account held with HSH Nordbank AG in
connection with the restructured credit facility by $4.4 million.
Accounts receivable, net increased by $76.8 million from $28.2 million at December 31, 2006 to
$105.0 million at December 31, 2007 (including receivables as part of the acquisition of Kleimar
amounting to $0.7 million). The primary reason was the acquisition of Kleimar, as well as a change
in the amount receivable from FFA trading partners which increased by $35.5 million from $23.5
million at December 31, 2006 to $59.0 million at December 31, 2007 and an increase in all other
receivable categories by $40.6 million.
Prepaid expenses and other current assets increased by $34.3 million from $6.8 million at
December 31, 2006 to $41.1 million at December 31, 2007 (including prepaid expenses and other
current assets obtained as part of the acquisition of Kleimar amounting to $3.8 million). The main
reason was the increase in inventories of $10.3 million, the increase in prepaid voyage and
operating costs of $18.5 million and the increase in other assets of $2.3 million mainly relating
to Horamars acquisition costs. This increase was mitigated by a decrease in claims of $0.6
million.
Accounts payable increased by $69.3 million from $37.4 million at December 31, 2006 to
$106.7 million at December 31, 2007 (including accounts payable obtained as part of the acquisition
of Kleimar amounting to $9.4 million). The primary reasons for the increase was the change in the
amount due to FFA trading partners, which increased by $48.8 million during the year ended December
31, 2007, the increase in head owners payables by $4.7 million and the increase in other suppliers
and brokers by $6.4 million.
Accrued expenses increased by $27.2 million to $37.9 million at December 31, 2007 (including
accrued expenses obtained as part of the acquisition of Kleimar amounting to $6.7 million) from
$10.7 million at December 31, 2006. The primary reasons were (a) the increase of the accrual for
voyage expenses by $12.4 million including additional provision of $11.4 million for losses on
voyage in progress compared to the same period in 2006, (b) the increase of consultancy, legal fees
and bonus accrual by $5.4 million, and (c) the increase of the accrual for interest cost by $3.0
million. The above increase was mitigated by a $0.3 million decrease in all other categories.
Deferred voyage revenue primarily reflects freight and charter-out amounts collected on
voyages that have not been completed. Deferred freight increased by $13.0 million and deferred hire
increased by $13.7 million as a result of an increase in the number of voyages extending over the
period end.
Cash used in investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2007 as compared to the year
ended December 31, 2006:
Cash used in investing activities was $16.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2007, as
compared to $111.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2006.
In February 2007, Navios Holdings paid $145.4 million (net of acquired cash of $22.1 million),
for the acquisition of Kleimar.
In November 2007, following the IPO of Navios Partners, Navios Holdings received aggregate
cash proceeds of $353.3 million from the sale of eight of its wholly-owned subsidiaries to Navios
Partners.
During the year ended December 31, 2007, Navios Holdings received $9.0 million of installments
in connection with the finance lease receivable.
During 2007, Navios Holdings paid $182.8 million as deposits for the acquisition of nine
Capesize vessels to be delivered in various dates until the first quarter of 2010. In addition,
Navios Holdings deposited $5.5 million in restricted accounts in connection with the acquisition of
Navios Orbiter and Navios Fantastiks. As of November 15, 2007, Navios Partners held the rights to
acquire the vessel Navios Fantastiks delivered in April 2008.
75
During 2007, Navios Holdings paid $44.5 million for the acquisition of Navios Hyperion in
February and the acquisition of the 50% of White Narcissus S.A., the vessel owning company of 50%
of the vessel Navios Asteriks in April.
Purchase of property and equipment for the year ended December 31, 2007 amounted to $0.6
million.
In 2006, Navios Holdings paid $108.1 million for the acquisition of one vessel and five
purchase option vessels and made a $2.1 million deposit in connection with the exercised option for
the acquisition of vessel Navios Hyperion, which was delivered on February 26, 2007.
Purchase of property and equipment for the year ended December 31, 2006 amounted to $1.3
million.
Cash provided by financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2007 as compared to the year
ended December 31, 2006:
Cash provided by financing activities was $216.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2007,
as compared to $117.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2006.
Cash provided by financing activities was the result of (a) the exercise of warrants in
January 2007 which resulted in $66.6 million of net cash proceeds, (b) the net proceeds of
approximately $124.9 million relating to the increase in share capital through a secondary public
offering, (c) the proceeds of approximately $48.1 million relating to share capital increases due
to exercise of warrants, (d) the net proceeds from Emporiki Bank of Greece of $16.6 million and (e)
the proceeds from a new secured credit facility which is composed of $280.0 million Term Loan
Facility and $120.0 million reducing Revolving Credit Facility. The proceeds from the new credit
facility were utilized to partially finance the acquisition of vessel Navios Hyperion, to repay the
remaining outstanding balance of the previous HSH Nordbank facility ($271.0 million), to partially
finance the acquisition of Kleimar and to partially finance the acquisition of White Narcissus S.A.
The above increase was offset by a $136.0 million installments paid in connection with Navios
Holdings credit facilities and $26.0 million of dividends paid.
Cash provided by financing activities in 2006 was the result of $116.9 million in proceeds
from the restructured senior secured credit facility signed on December 21, 2005, which were
partially utilized to finance the acquisition of one vessel and five purchase option vessels, the
proceeds from the warrants resulting in the issuance of common stock of $65.4 million and the net
proceeds from the senior notes of $291.5 million a portion of which ($290.0 million) was used to
prepay in full three tranches of approximately $241.1 million and on a pro-rata basis the remaining
tranches of the existing senior secured credit facility. This was offset by $50.5 million of
installment paid in connection with the senior secured credit facility and $15.4 million of
dividends paid.
Adjusted EBITDA: EBITDA represents net income before interest, taxes, depreciation, and
amortization. Adjusted EBITDA in this document represents EBITDA before stock based compensation. Navios Holdings
uses Adjusted EBITDA because Navios Holdings believes that Adjusted EBITDA is a basis upon which
liquidity can be assessed and presents useful information to investors regarding Navios Holdings
ability to service and/or incur indebtedness. Navios Holdings also uses Adjusted EBITDA: (i) by
prospective and current lessors as well as potential lenders to evaluate potential transactions;
and (ii) to evaluate and price potential acquisition candidates.
Adjusted EBITDA has limitations as an analytical tool, and should not be considered in isolation or
as a substitute for analysis of Navios Holdings results as reported under U.S. GAAP. Some of
these limitations are: (i) Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect changes in, or cash requirements for,
working capital needs; and (ii) although depreciation and amortization are non-cash charges, the
assets being depreciated and amortized may have to be replaced in the future, and Adjusted EBITDA
does not reflect any cash requirements for such capital expenditures. Because of these limitations,
Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered as a principal indicator of Navios Holdings performance.
Adjusted EBITDA for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 was $165.5 million and
$349.9 million, respectively. The decrease in Adjusted EBITDA of $184.4 million was due to (a) the
$167.5 million gain recognized from sale of assets of Navios Holdings to Navios Partners in
November 2007, (b) a decrease in gain from FFA trading by $10.2 million from $26.4 million in the
year ended
76
December 31, 2007 to $16.2 million in the same period in 2008, (c) an increase in time
charter, voyage and logistic business expenses by $508.6 million from $557.6 million in the year
ended December 31, 2007 to $1,066.2 million in the same period in 2008, (d) an increase in general
and administrative expenses by $14.8 million from $22.5 million in the year ended December 31, 2007
to $37.3 million for the same period in 2008 (excluding $2.7 million and $0.6 million share-based
compensation for the year ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively), (e) a $1.3 million
decrease in interest income from finance leases, (f) a $1.7 million decrease due to minority
interest, (g) $2.7 million of write off of doubtful accounts relating to FFA trading and (h) a
$10.0 million increase in net other expenses mainly due to $5.3 million of the unrealized losses in
investment in Navios Acquisition warrants acquired as part of the IPO of Navios Acquisition in July
2008, $1.5 million cancellation fee related to three Capesize vessels and $1.6 million additional
unfavorable losses on the interest rate swaps during 2008 compared to 2007. This overall
unfavorable variance of $716.8 million was mitigated by $27.8 million gain recognized on sale of
vessels Obeliks and Navios Aurora I and of CNSA to the minority shareholders of Navios Logistics in
2008, $487.6 million increase in revenue, $15.5 million increase in equity in net earnings from
affiliated companies and $1.5 million decrease in direct vessel expenses (excluding the
amortization of deferred dry dock and special survey costs).
Adjusted EBITDA increased by $246.7 million to $349.9 million for the year ended December 31,
2007 as compared to $103.2 million for the same period of 2006. This $246.7 million increase in
Adjusted EBITDA was primarily due to (a) $167.5 million gain relating to the sale of assets to
Navios Partners, (b) a $6.6 million increase in gain from FFAs, (c) a $553.1 million increase in
revenue, (d) a $3.5 million increase in interest income from investments in finance leases, (e) a
$1.3 million increase in equity in net earnings of affiliated companies and joint venture and (f) a
$6.2 million decrease in provision for losses on accounts receivable. The above overall favorable
variance of $738.2 million was mitigated by (a) the increase in time charter, voyage and port
terminal expenses by $473.4 million, (b) the increase in general and administrative expenses by
$7.4 million (excluding the share based compensation expenses of $0.6 million), (c) the $7.7
million increase in direct vessel expenses (excluding the amortization of deferred dry dock and
special survey costs) as a result of the increase of ownership days to 6,473 days in 2007 compared
to 3,979 days for the same period in 2006 and (d) the 3.0 million increase in net other expense.
Long Term Debt Obligations and Credit Arrangements:
In December 2006, Navios Holdings repaid $290.0 million of the loan facility entered with HSH
Nordbank A.G. in December 2005 from the net proceeds of the senior notes discussed below while the
balance of the facility remaining at December 31, 2006 was fully repaid from the proceeds of a
syndicated loan taken in February 2007.
On December 21, 2005, and in connection with the senior secured credit facility discussed
above, Navios Holdings entered into an ISDA (International Swap Dealer Association, Inc.) Agreement
(amended in February 2007 in connection with the secured loan facility) with HSH Nordbank AG,
providing for (a) interest rate swaps whereas the company exchanges LIBOR with a fixed rate of
4.74% (this contract applies for the period from March 2006 to March 2007 on notional amounts
starting at $171.0 million and de-escalating down to $100.5 million following the loan repayment
schedule) and 5.52% (this contract applies for the period from December 2007 to September 2009 on
notional amounts starting at $79.4 million and de-escalating down to $14.8 million following the
loan repayment schedule), and (b) interest rate collar with a cap of 5.00% and a floor of 4.45%
(this contract applies for the period from March 2007 to June 2008 on notional amounts starting at
$82.0 million and de-escalating down to $13.3 million following the loan repayment schedule). The
ISDA Agreement is bound by the same securities as the senior secured loan facility discussed in the
preceding paragraph.
In December 2006, Navios Holdings issued $300.0 million of 9.5% senior notes due December 15,
2014. Part of the net proceeds of approximately $290.0 million from the issuance of these senior
notes was used to repay in full the remaining principal amounts under three tranches of
approximately $241.1 million and the remaining proceeds were applied pro-rata among the remaining
tranches under the credit facility discussed under Liquidity and Capital Resources above. The
senior notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed, jointly and severally and on an unsecured
senior basis, by all of the Companys subsidiaries, other than the Uruguayan subsidiary, CNSA. At
any time before December 15, 2009, Navios Holdings may redeem up to 35% of the aggregate principal
amount of the notes with the net proceeds of a public equity offering at 109.5% of the principal
amount of the notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, so long as at least 65% of the
originally issued aggregate principal amount of the notes remains outstanding after such redemption. In addition, Navios Holdings
has the option to redeem the notes in whole or in part, at any time (1) before December 15, 2010,
at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount plus a make whole price which is based
on a formula calculated using a discount rate of treasury bonds plus 50 basis points, and (2) on or
after December 15, 2010, at a fixed price of 104.75%, which price declines ratably until it reaches
par in 2012. Furthermore, upon occurrence of certain change of control events, the holders of the
senior notes may require the Company to repurchase some or all of the notes at 101% of their face
amount. The senior notes contain covenants which, among other things, limit the incurrence of
additional indebtedness, issuance of certain preferred stock, the payment of dividends, redemption
or repurchase of capital stock or making restricted payments and investments, creation of certain
liens, transfer or sale of assets, entering into transactions with affiliates, merging or
consolidating or selling all or substantially all of Companys properties and assets and creation
or designation of restricted subsidiaries. Pursuant to the covenant regarding asset sales, the
Company has to repay the senior notes at par plus interest with the proceeds of certain asset sales
if the proceeds from such asset sales are not reinvested in the business within a specified period or
used to pay secured debt.
77
In February 2007, Navios Holdings entered into a new secured Loan Facility with HSH Nordbank
and Commerzbank AG maturing on October 31, 2014. The new facility is composed of a $280.0 million
Term Loan Facility and a $120.0 million Revolver Facility. The Term Loan Facility has partially
been utilized to repay the remaining balance of the previous HSH Nordbank facility with the
remaining balance left to finance the acquisition of Navios Hyperion. The Revolver Facility is
available for future acquisitions and general corporate and working capital purposes. In April
2008, the Company amended the facility due to a prepayment of $10.0 million.
The secured loan facility contains covenants similar to those of the senior notes discussed
above. It also requires compliance with financial covenants including specified security value
maintenance to total debt percentage and minimum liquidity. It is an event of default under the
credit facility if such covenants are not complied with or if Angeliki Frangou, Navios Holdings
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, beneficially owns less than 20% of the issued stock.
In March 2009, Navios Holdings amended again its facility agreement with HSH Nordbank and
Commerzbank A.G., effective as of November 15, 2008, as follows: (a) to reduce the Security Value
Maintenance (SVM) ratio (ratio of the charter-free valuations of the mortgaged vessels over the
outstanding loan amount) from 125% to 100%; (b) to obligate Navios Holdings to accumulate cash
reserves into a pledged account with the agent bank of $14.0 million ($5.0 million in March 2009
and $1.1 million on each loan repayment date during 2009 and 2010, starting from January 2009); and
(c) to set the margin at 200 bps. The amendment is effective until January 31, 2010. At December
31, 2008, Navios Holdings was in compliance with the financial covenants, including the SVM ratio,
as required under its amended facility agreement However, if Navios Holdings was required to use
the original SVM ratio on December 31, 2008 to test compliance, it may not have been in compliance.
In December 2007, Navios Holdings entered into a new facility agreement with Emporiki Bank of
Greece of up to $154.0 million in order to partially finance the construction of two Capesize bulk
carriers scheduled to be delivered in December 2009 and February 2010. The principal amount is
available for partial drawdown according to terms of the payment of the shipbuilding contracts. As
of December 31, 2008, the amount drawn was $51.1 million. The facility is repayable upon delivery
of the Capesize vessels in 10 semi-annual installments of $6.3 million and 10 semi-annual
installments of $4.5 million with a final payment of $46.5 million on the last payment date. The
interest rate of the facility is LIBOR plus a margin of 80 basis points, as defined in the
agreement, and requires compliance with the covenants contained in the senior notes. After the
delivery of the vessels the loan also requires compliance with certain financial covenants.
On March 31, 2008, Nauticler S.A. (subsidiary of Navios Logistics) entered into a $70.0
million loan facility for the purpose of providing Nauticler S.A. with investment capital to be
used in connection with one or more investment projects. The loan is repayable in one installment
by March 2011 and bears interest at LIBOR plus 1.75%. In March 2009, Navios Logistics transferred
this loan facility to Marfin Popular Bank Public Co. Ltd. The loan was transferred under the same
terms except for an increase in margin to 275 bps.
In June 2008, Navios Holdings entered into a new facility agreement with DNB NOR BANK ASA
of up to $133.0 million in order to partially finance the
construction of two Capesize bulk carriers. The principal amount is available for partial drawdown according to terms of the
payment of the shipbuilding contracts. As of December 31, 2008, the amount drawn was $18.0 million.
The facility is repayable upon delivery of the Capesize vessels in 16 semi-annual installments of
$3.7 million with a final payment of $73.8 million on the last payment date. The interest rate of
the facility is LIBOR plus a margin of 100 basis points, as defined in the agreement.
78
In December 2008, Navios Holdings entered into a $90.0 million revolving credit facility with
Marfin Egnatia Bank for general corporate purposes. The loan is repayable in one installment in
December 2010 and bears interest at LIBOR plus 2.75%.
Upon acquisition of Kleimar and Horamar the following loans were assumed:
On April 28, 2004, Kleimar entered into a $40.0 million credit facility with Fortis Bank and
Dexia Bank maturing in February 2012. The facility is secured by a mortgage on a vessel together
with assignment of earnings and insurances.
On August 4, 2005, Kleimar entered into a $21.0 million loan facility with DVB Bank for the
purchase of a vessel maturing in August 2010. The loan is secured by a mortgage on a vessel
together with assignment of earnings and insurances.
On April 22, 2005, Kleimar entered into a $17.8 million loan agreement for the purchase of a
vessel. The Company was responsible for 50% of the total loan, and so its share of the loan at
drawdown was $8.9 million. The facility was secured by a mortgage on a vessel together with
assignment of earnings and insurances. The facility was fully repaid on March 31, 2007.
In connection with the acquisition of Horamar, Navios Holdings assumed a $9.5 million
loan facility that was entered into by HS Shipping LTD Inc. in 2006, in order to finance the
building of a 8,900 DWT double hull tanker (MALVA H). The loan bears interest at LIBOR plus 5.5%
during the construction period, which lasted until February 2008. After the vessel delivery the
interest rate is LIBOR plus 1.5%. The loan will be repaid by installments that shall not be less
than 90% of the amount of the last hire payment due to be paid to HS Shipping Ltd Inc. The
repayment date should not exceed December 31, 2011. The loan can be pre-paid before such date, with
two days written notice. Borrowings under the loan are subject to certain financial covenants and
restrictions on dividend payments and other related items. As of December 31, 2008, HS Shipping Ltd
Inc. is in compliance with all the covenants.
In connection with the acquisition of Horamar, the Company assumed a $2.3 million loan
facility that was entered into by Thalassa Energy S.A. in October 2007 in order to finance the
purchase of two self-propelled barges (Formosa and San Lorenzo). The loan bears interest at LIBOR
plus 1.5%. The loan will be repaid by 5 equal installments of $0.5 million on November 2008,
June 2009, January 2010, August 2010 and March 2011. Borrowings under the loan are subject to
certain financial covenants and restrictions on dividend payments and other related items. As of
December 31, 2008, Thalassa Energy S.A. is in compliance with all the covenants. The loan is
secured by a first priority mortgage over the two self-propelled barges (Formosa and San Lorenzo).
The maturity table below reflects the principal payments of all credit facilities outstanding
as of December 31, 2008 for the next five years and thereafter are based on the repayment schedule
of the respective loan facilities discussed in the previous paragraphs and the outstanding amount
due under the senior notes. The maturity table below includes in the amount shown for 2014 and
thereafter future principal payments of the undrawn portion of credit facilities associated with
the financing of the construction of Capesize vessels scheduled to be delivered on various dates
throughout 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount in |
Year |
|
millions of USD |
2009 |
|
|
15.2 |
|
2010 |
|
|
142.7 |
|
2011 |
|
|
104.0 |
|
2012 |
|
|
27.6 |
|
2013 |
|
|
27.2 |
|
2014 and thereafter |
|
|
572.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
889.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
79
On February 16, 2009, Navios Holdings concluded a facility of up to $120.0 million to finance
the acquisition of two Capesize vessels to be delivered. The loan is repayable in 20 semi-annual
installments and bears an interest rate of LIBOR plus 1.90%.
In March 2009, Navios Holdings concluded a loan facility of up to $110.0 million to be used
for general corporate purposes. The facility is repayable in one installment in February 2011 and
bears interest at a rate of LIBOR plus 2.75%.
Working Capital Position: On December 31, 2008, Navios Holdings current assets totaled
$505.4 million, while current liabilities totaled $271.5 million, resulting in a positive working
capital position of $233.9 million. Navios Holdings cash forecast indicates that it will generate
sufficient cash during 2009 and 2010 to make the required principal and interest payments on its
indebtedness, provide for the normal working capital requirements of the business and remain in a
positive cash position during 2009 and 2010.
While projections indicate that existing cash balances and operating cash flows will be
sufficient to service the existing indebtedness, Navios Holdings continues to review its cash flows
with a view toward increasing working capital.
Capital expenditures: In 2007 and 2008, the Company entered into agreements for the
acquisition of a total of eleven newbuild Capesize vessels. One of these Capesize vessels is
contracted to be sold to Navios Partners. In November 2008, the Company terminated three of the
above contracts. All Capesize vessels are scheduled for delivery on various dates throughout 2009.
The remaining capital obligations at December 31, 2008, left to be paid in 2009, depending on the
delivery of the Capesize vessels, amount to approximately $418.6 million. These capital obligations
will be funded by the Companys existing cash and term loan facilities or available credit lines as
well as any further financing arrangements.
Concentration of Credit Risk: Concentrations of credit risk with respect to accounts
receivables are limited due to Navios Holdings large number of customers, who are internationally
dispersed and have a variety of end markets in which they sell. Due to these factors, management
believes that no additional credit risk beyond amounts provided for collection losses is inherent
in Navios Holdings trade receivables. For the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, no customer
from the vessel operations segment accounted for more than 10.0% of Navios Holdings revenue, and
for the year ended December 31, 2006, two customers from the vessel operations segment accounted
for approximately 10.0% and 12.3% each of Navios Holdings revenue, respectively.
Effects of Inflation: Navios Holdings does not consider inflation to be a significant risk
to the cost of doing business in the foreseeable future. Inflation has a moderate impact on
operating expenses, dry docking expenses and corporate overhead. Refer to Statement of Operations
Breakdown by Segment in Operating Results for the discussion of the effects of inflation in
Navios Logistics operations.
C. Research and development, patents and licenses, etc.
Not applicable.
D. Trend information
Not applicable.
E. Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
Charter hire payments to third parties for chartered-in vessels are treated as operating
leases for accounting purposes. Navios Holdings is also committed to making rental payments under
operating leases for its office premises. With the exception of payments made during the year ended
December 31, 2008, future minimum rental payments under Navios Holdings non-cancelable operating
leases are disclosed in Navios Holdings Consolidated Financial Statements. As of December 31, 2008,
Navios Holdings was contingently liable for letters of guarantee and letters of credit amounting to
$2.5 million issued by various banks in favor of various organizations of which $1.5 million are
collateralized by cash deposits which are included as a component of restricted cash. Navios
Holdings issued no guarantees to third parties at December 31, 2008 as compared to $3.5 million at
December 31, 2007, pursuant to which Navios Holdings irrevocably and unconditionally guarantees its
subsidiaries obligations under the dry bulk shipping FFAs. The guarantees remain in effect for a
period of six months following the last trade date.
80
Upon acquisition of Horamar, the Companys subsidiaries in South America were contingently
liable for various claims and penalties towards the local tax authorities amounting to a total of
approximately $6.6 million. According to the acquisition agreement, if such cases are materialized
against the Company, the amounts involved will be reimbursed by the previous shareholders, and, as
such, the Company has recognized a respective receivable against such liability. The contingencies
are expected to be resolved in the next five years. In the opinion of management, the ultimate
disposition of these matters is immaterial and will not adversely affect the Companys financial
position, results of operations or liquidity.
F. Contractual Obligations as at December 31, 2008:
Payment due by period ($ in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More than |
Contractual Obligations |
|
Total |
|
1 year |
|
1-3 years |
|
3-5 years |
|
5 years |
Long term debt(i)(ii) (iii) |
|
|
889.4 |
|
|
|
15.2 |
|
|
|
246.7 |
|
|
|
54.8 |
|
|
|
572.7 |
|
Operating Lease Obligations (Time Charters)(iv) |
|
|
881.8 |
|
|
|
107.6 |
|
|
|
204.7 |
|
|
|
192.2 |
|
|
|
377.3 |
|
Operating lease obligations push boats and barges |
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Vessel deposits(v) |
|
|
418.6 |
|
|
|
418.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rent Obligations(vi) |
|
|
12.6 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
|
(i) |
|
The amount identified does not include interest costs associated with the outstanding credit facilities which are based on LIBOR or applicable interest rate swap rates, plus the costs of complying with any applicable
regulatory requirements and a margin ranging from 1.5% to 2.75% per annum. |
|
(ii) |
|
Following the amendment of the facility agreement with HSH Nordbank and Commerzbank A.G in March 2009, Navios Holdings has to accumulate $14.0 million of cash reserves into a pledged account with the agent bank ($5.0 million
in March 2009 and $1.1 million on each loan repayment date during 2009 and 2010, starting from January 2009),.In February and March 2009, Navios Holdings concluded (a) a 2% convertible bond of $33.5 million exercisable
at a
price of $11.00 per share, (b) a facility of up to $120.0 million to finance the acquisition of two Capesize vessels to be delivered, repayable in 20 semi-annual installments, and (c) a term loan facility of up to $110.0
million to be used for general corporate purposes, repayable in one installment in February 2011. |
|
(iii) |
|
The long term debt contractual obligations includes in the amount shown for more than 5 years future principal payments of the undrawn portion of credit facilities associated with the financing of the construction of Capesize
vessels scheduled to be delivered on various dates throughout 2009. |
|
(iv) |
|
The effect of the exercise of the options is reflected in the reduction of operating lease obligations as of December 31, 2008. |
|
(v) |
|
Future remaining contractual deposits for the seven owned Capesize vessels to be delivered in various dates in 2009. |
|
(vi) |
|
On January 2, 2006, the Company relocated its headquarters to new premises in Piraeus, Greece. In October 2006, the Company signed an agreement with a third party to sublease
approximately 2,000 square feet of its Norwalk office. Kleimar has leased approximately 387 square meters to locate its offices. Navios Logistics has several lease agreements to locate
its offices. The table above incorporates only the lease obligation of the offices indicated in this footnote. Minimum payments have not been reduced by minimum sublease rentals of a
total amount of $0.3 million due until the end if the sublease agreement, under a non cancelable sublease. |
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157 (SFAS
157) Fair Value Measurement. SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for
measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and expands disclosures
about fair value measurements. SFAS 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal
years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Earlier
application is encouraged, provided that the reporting entity has not yet issued financial statements for
that fiscal year, including financial statements for an interim period within that fiscal year. The
provisions of SFAS 157 should be applied prospectively as of the beginning of the fiscal year in
which it is initially applied except for certain cases where it should be applied retrospectively.
This statement was effective for the Company for the fiscal year beginning on January 1, 2008 and
it did not have a material affect on its consolidated financial statements.
81
In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 159 (SFAS
159) The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities. SFAS 159 permits
the entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value
that are not currently required to be measured at fair value. This Statement is expected to expand
the use of fair value measurement, which is consistent with the Boards long term measurement
objectives for accounting for financial instruments. SFAS 159 is effective as of the beginning of
an entitys first fiscal year that begins after November 15, 2007. Early adoption is permitted as
of the beginning of a fiscal year on or before November 15, 2007, provided the entity also elects
to apply the provisions of FASB Statement No. 157, Fair Value Measurements. This statement was
effective for the Company for the fiscal year beginning on January 1, 2008 and it did not have a
material affect on its consolidated financial statements.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), Business Combinations
(FAS 141R), which replaces FASB Statement No. 141. FAS 141R establishes principles and
requirements for how an acquirer recognizes and measures in its financial statements the
identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed any non controlling interest in the acquiree
and the goodwill acquired. The Statement also establishes disclosure requirements which will enable
users to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business combination. FAS 141R will be
effective for Navios Holdings for fiscal year beginning on January 1, 2009. Navios Holdings is
currently evaluating the potential impact of the adoption of FAS 141R on its consolidated financial
statements.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated
Financial Statementamendments of ARB No. 51 (SFAS 160). SFAS 160 states that accounting and
reporting for minority interests will be recharacterized as noncontrolling interests and classified
as a component of equity. The Statement also establishes reporting requirements that provide
sufficient disclosures that clearly identify and distinguish between the interests of the parent
and the interests of the noncontrolling owners. SFAS No. 160 applies to all entities that prepare
consolidated financial statements, except not-for-profit organizations, but will affect only those
entities that have an outstanding noncontrolling interest in one or more subsidiaries or that
deconsolidate a subsidiary. This statement was effective as of January 1, 2009. The Company is
currently evaluating the potential impact of the adoption of SFAS 160 on its consolidated financial
statements.
In February 2008, the FASB issued the FASB Staff Position (FSP 157-2) which delays the
effective date of SFAS 157, for nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except for items
that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis (at
least annually). For purposes of applying this FSP, nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial
liabilities would include all assets and liabilities other that those meeting the definition of a
financial asset or financial liability as defined in paragraph 6 of FASB Statement No. 159, The
Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities This FSP defers the effective
date of SFAS 157 to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008, and the interim periods within
those fiscal years for items within the scope of this FSP. The application of SFAS 157 in future
periods to those items covered by FSP 157-2 would not have a material effect on the consolidated
financial statements of the Company.
In March 2008, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 161 (SFAS
161) Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities an amendment of FASB
Statement No. 133. SFAS 161 changes the disclosure requirements for derivative instruments and
hedging activities. Entities are required to provide enhanced disclosures about (a) how and why an
entity uses derivative instruments, (b) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are
accounted for under Statement 133 and its related interpretations, and (c) how derivative
instruments and related hedged items affect an entitys financial position, financial performance,
and cash flows. This statement is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and
interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008, with early application encouraged. This
statement encourages, but does not require, comparative disclosures for earlier periods at initial adoption. The Company is
currently evaluating the potential impact, if any, of the adoption of SFAS 161 on its consolidated
financial statements.
82
In April 2008, FASB issued FASB Staff Position FSP 142-3 Determination of the useful life of
intangible assets. This FASB Staff Position (FSP) amends the factors that should be considered in
developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized
intangible asset under FASB Statement No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. The intent
of this FSP is to improve the consistency between the useful life of a recognized intangible asset
under Statement 142 and the period of expected cash flows used to measure the fair value of the
asset under FASB Statement No. 141 (revised 2007), Business Combinations, and other U.S. GAAP.
This FSP will be effective for Navios Holdings for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008,
and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is prohibited. The adoption of FSP
142-3 is not expected to have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements of the
Company.
In May 2008, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 162, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles. The new standard is intended to improve financial reporting by identifying
a consistent framework, or hierarchy, for selecting accounting principles to be used in preparing
financial statements that are presented in conformity with U.S. GAAP for nongovernmental entities.
Statement No. 162 is effective 60 days following the SECs approval of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board Auditing amendments to AU Section 411, The Meaning of Present Fairly in
Conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. The adoption of SFAS No. 162 is not
expected to have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements of the Company.
In June 2008, FASB issued FASB Staff Position FSP EITF 03-6-1 Determining whether instruments
granted in share-based payment transactions are participating securities. This FASB Staff Position
(FSP) addresses whether instruments granted in share-based payment transactions are participating
securities prior to vesting and, therefore, need to be included in the earnings allocation in
computing earnings per share (EPS) under the two-class method described in paragraphs 60 and 61 of
FASB Statement No. 128, Earnings per Share. This FSP will be effective for the Company for fiscal
years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years. All
prior-period EPS data presented shall be adjusted retrospectively (including interim financial
statements, summaries of earnings, and selected financial data) to conform with the provisions of
this FSP. Early application is not permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the potential
impact, if any, of the adoption of FSP EITF 03-6-1 on the Companys consolidated financial
statements.
In September 2008, FASB issued FASB Staff Positions (FSP) FAS 133-1 and FIN 45-4 Disclosures
about Credit Derivatives and Certain Guarantees: An Amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 and FASB
Interpretation No. 45; and Clarification of the Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 161. This FSP
amends FASB Statement No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, to
require disclosures by sellers of credit derivatives, including credit derivatives embedded in a
hybrid instrument. This FSP also amends FASB Interpretation No. 45, Guarantors Accounting and
Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others, to
require an additional disclosure about the current status of the payment/performance risk of a
guarantee. Further, this FSP clarifies the FASBs intent about the effective date of FASB Statement
No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. This FSP applies to
credit derivatives within the scope of Statement 133, hybrid instruments that have embedded credit
derivatives, and guarantees within the scope of Interpretation 45. This FSPs amendment to
Statement 133 also pertains to hybrid instruments that have embedded credit derivatives (for
example, credit-linked notes). The provisions of this FSP that amend Statement 133 and
Interpretation 45 shall be effective for reporting periods (annual or interim) ending after
November 15, 2008. This FSP encourages that the amendments to Statement 133 and Interpretation 45
be applied in periods earlier than the effective date to facilitate comparisons at initial
adoption. In periods after initial adoption, this FSP requires comparative disclosures only for
periods ending subsequent to initial adoption. The adoption of FSP 133-1 and FIN 45-4 is not
expected to have a material effect on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
In October 2008, the FASB issued the FASB Staff Position (FSP No. 157-3) which clarifies the
application of FASB Statement No. 157, Fair Value Measurements in a market that is not active and
provides an example to illustrate key considerations in determining the fair value of a financial
asset when the market for that asset is not active. This FSP applies to financial assets within the
scope of accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements in accordance
with Statement 157. The FSP shall be effective upon issuance, including prior periods for which
financial statements have not been issued. Revisions resulting from a change in the valuation
technique or its application shall be accounted for as a change in accounting estimate (FASB
Statement No. 154 Accounting changes and Error Corrections, paragraph 19). The disclosure
provisions of Statement No. 154 for a change in accounting estimate are not required for revisions
resulting from a change in valuation technique or its application. The application of FSP 157-3 did
not have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements of the Company.
83
In November 2008, the FASB issued its final consensus on Issue 08-8 Accounting for an
instrument (or an embedded Feature) with a settlement amount that is based on the stock of an
entitys consolidated subsidiary. This issue applies to freestanding financial instruments (and
embedded features) for which the payoff to the counterparty is based, in whole or in part, on the
stock of a consolidated subsidiary. This issue applies to those instruments (and embedded features)
in the consolidated financial statements of the parent, whether the instrument was entered into by
the parent or the subsidiary. This issue will be effective for fiscal years beginning on or after
December 15, 2008 and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is not permitted.
The consensus shall be applied to outstanding instruments as of the beginning of the fiscal year in
which this issue is initially applied. The adoption of Issue 08-8 is not expected to have a
material effect on the consolidated financial statements of the Company.
In November 2008, the FASB issued the EITF Issue No. 08-6 Equity Method Investment Accounting
Considerations (EITF 08-6) to clarify the accounting for certain transactions and impairment
considerations involving equity method investments. The FASB and the IASB concluded a joint effort
in converging the accounting for business combinations as well as the accounting and reporting for
noncontrolling interests culminating in the issuance of Statement 141(R) and Statement 160. The
objective of that joint effort was not to reconsider the accounting for equity method investments;
however, the application of the equity method is affected by the accounting for business
combinations and the accounting for consolidated subsidiaries, which were affected by the issuance
of Statement 141(R) and Statement 160. EITF 08-6 is effective for fiscal years beginning on or
after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years, consistent with the
effective dates of Statement 141(R) and Statement 160. EITF 08-6 shall be applied prospectively.
Earlier application by an entity that has previously adopted an alternative accounting policy is
not permitted. The adoption of EITF 08-6 is not expected to have a material effect on the
consolidated financial statements of the Company.
In December 2008, the FASB issued the FASB Staff Position (FSP FAS 140-4 and FIN 46(R)-8)
which amends FASB Statement No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets
and Extinguishments of Liabilities, to require public entities to provide additional disclosures
about transfers of financial assets. It also amends FASB Interpretation No. 46 (revised December
2003), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, to require public enterprises, including
sponsors that have a variable interest in a variable interest entity, to provide additional
disclosures about their involvement with variable interest entities. Additionally, FSP FAS 140-4
and FIN 46(R)-8 requires certain disclosures to be provided by a public enterprise that is (a) a
sponsor of a qualifying special-purpose entity (SPE) that holds a variable interest in the
qualifying SPE but was not the transferor (nontransferor) of financial assets to the qualifying
SPE and (b) a servicer of a qualifying SPE that holds a significant variable interest in the
qualifying SPE but was not the transferor (nontransferor) of financial assets to the qualifying
SPE. FSP FAS 140-4 and FIN 46(R)-8 is effective for the first reporting period (interim or annual)
ending after December 15, 2008, with earlier application encouraged. The adoption of FSP FAS 140-4
and FIN 46(R)-8 is not expected to have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements
of the Company.
In January 2009, the FASB issued the FASB Staff Position Amendments to the Impairment
Guidance to EITF Issue No. 99-20 (FSP EITF 99-20-1) which amends the impairment guidance in EITF
Issue No.99-20, Recognition of Interest Income and Impairment on Purchased Beneficial Interests
and Beneficial Interests That Continue to Be Held by a Transferor in Securitized Financial Assets,
to achieve more consistent determination of whether an other-than-temporary impairment has
occurred. FSP EITF 99-20-1 also retains and emphasizes the objective of an other-than-temporary
impairment assessment and the related disclosure requirements in FASB Statement No. 115,
84
Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities, and other related
guidance. FSP EITF 99-20-1 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after
December 15, 2008, and shall be applied prospectively. Retrospective application to a prior interim
or annual reporting period is not permitted. The adoption of FSP EITF 99-20-1 is not expected to
have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements of the Company.
Critical Accounting Policies
The Navios Holdings consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with
U.S. GAAP. The preparation of these financial statements requires Navios Holdings to make estimates
in the application of its accounting policies based on the best assumptions, judgments and opinions
of management. Following is a discussion of the accounting policies that involve a higher degree of
judgment and the methods of their application that affect the reported amount of assets and
liabilities, revenues and expenses and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at
the date of its financial statements. Actual results may differ from these estimates under
different assumptions or conditions.
Critical accounting policies are those that reflect significant judgments or uncertainties,
and potentially result in materially different results under different assumptions and conditions.
Navios Holdings has described below what it believes are its most critical accounting policies that
involve a high degree of judgment and the methods of their application. For a description of all of
Navios Holdings significant accounting policies, see Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements, included herein.
Use of estimates: The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with
U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of
assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the dates of the
financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting
periods. On an on-going basis, management evaluates the estimates and judgments, including those
related to uncompleted voyages, future drydock dates, the carrying value of investments in
affiliates, the selection of useful lives for tangible assets, expected future cash flows from
long-lived assets to support impairment tests, provisions necessary for accounts receivables,
provisions for legal disputes, pension benefits, and contingencies. Management bases its estimates
and judgments on historical experience and on various other factors that are believed to be
reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about
the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources.
Actual results could differ from those estimates under different assumptions and/or conditions.
Accounting for derivative financial instruments and hedge activities: The Company enters
into dry bulk shipping FFAs as economic hedges relating to identifiable ship and or cargo positions
and as economic hedges of transactions the Company expects to carry out in the normal course of its
shipping business. By utilizing certain derivative instruments, including dry bulk shipping FFAs,
the Company manages the financial risk associated with fluctuating market conditions. In entering
into these contracts, the Company has assumed the risk that might arise from the possible inability
of counterparties to meet the terms of their contracts.
The Company also trades dry bulk shipping FFAs which are cleared through NOS ASA, a Norwegian
clearing house and LCH the London clearing house. NOS ASA and LCH call for both base and margin
collaterals, which are funded by Navios Holdings, and which in turn substantially eliminate
counterparty risk. Certain portions of these collateral funds may be restricted at any given time
as determined by NOS ASA and LCH.
At the end of each calendar quarter, the fair value of dry bulk shipping FFAs traded
over-the-counter are determined from an index published in London, United Kingdom and the fair
value of those FFAs traded with NOS ASA and LCH are determined from the NOS ASA and LCH valuations
accordingly.
Pursuant to SFAS 133, the Company records all of its derivative financial instruments and
hedges as economic hedges except for those qualifying for hedge accounting. Gains or losses of
instruments qualifying for hedge accounting as cash flow hedges are reflected under Accumulated
Other Comprehensive Income/(Loss) in stockholders equity, while those instruments that do not
meet the
85
criteria for hedge accounting are reflected in the statement of operations. For FFAs that
qualify for hedge accounting the changes in fair values of the effective portion representing
unrealized gain or losses are recorded under Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income/(Loss) in the
stockholders equity while the unrealized gains or losses of the FFAs not qualifying for hedge
accounting together with the ineffective portion of those qualifying for hedge accounting, are
recorded in the statement of operations under Gain/(Loss) on Forward Freight Agreements. The
gains/(losses) included in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income/(Loss) are being reclassified
to earnings under Revenue in the statement of operations in the same period or periods during
which the hedged forecasted transaction affects earnings. The reclassification to earnings
commenced in the third quarter of 2006 and extended until December 31, 2008, depending on the
period or periods during which the hedged forecasted transactions will affect earnings. There is no
amount included in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income/(Loss) as of December 31, 2008, that is
expected to be reclassified to earnings after December 31, 2008. For the years ended December 31,
2008, 2007 and 2006, $19.9 million, $9.8 million and $4.2 million losses, respectively, included in
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income/ (Loss), were reclassified to earnings.
The Company classifies cash flows related to derivative financial instruments within cash
provided by operating activities in the consolidated statement of cash flows.
Stock-based compensation: On October 18, 2007 and December 16, 2008, the Compensation
Committee of the Board of Directors authorized the issuance of restricted stock and stock options
in accordance with Navios Holdings Stock Plan. The Company awarded restricted stock to its
employees, officers and directors and stock options to its executives and directors, based on
service conditions only, that vest over two years and three years, respectively.
The fair value of stock option grants is determined with reference to option pricing models,
principally adjusted Black-Scholes models. The fair value of restricted stock grants is determined
by reference to the quoted stock price on the date of grant. Compensation expense, net of estimated
forfeitures, is recognized based on a graded expense model over the vesting period.
Impairment of long-lived assets: Vessels, other fixed assets and other long lived assets
held and used by Navios Holdings are reviewed periodically for potential impairment whenever events
or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of a particular asset may not be
fully recoverable. In accordance with FAS 144, Navios Holdings management evaluates the carrying
amounts and periods over which long-lived assets are depreciated to determine if events or changes
in circumstances have occurred that would require modification to their carrying values or useful
lives. In evaluating useful lives and carrying values of long-lived assets, certain indicators of
potential impairment, are reviewed such as undiscounted projected operating cash flows, vessel
sales and purchases, business plans and overall market conditions. Undiscounted projected net
operating cash flows are determined for each vessel and compared to the vessel carrying value. In
the event that impairment occurred, the fair value of the related asset is determined and an
impairment charge is recorded to operations calculated by comparing the assets carrying value to
the estimated fair market value. Fair market value is estimated primarily through the use of
third-party valuations performed on an individual vessel basis. For the purposes of assessing
impairment, long-lived assets are grouped at the lowest levels for which there are separately
identifiable cash flows.
During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008, management concluded that events occurred and
circumstances had changes, which may indicate the existence of potential impairment of Navios
Holdings long-lived assets. These indicators included a significant decline in Navios Holdings
stock price, continued deterioration in the spot market, and the related, impact the current
drybulk sector has on managements expectation for future revenues. As a result, an interim
impairment assessment of long-lived assets is performed. Unless these indicators improve, it is
likely that an interim impairment analysis will be required to be performed in future quarters.
The interim testing was a review of the undiscounted projected net operating cash flows for
each vessel compared to the carrying value. The significant factors and assumptions used in the
undiscounted projected net operating cash flow analysis included: earnings, dry docking off-hire
costs and operating expenses. Earnings assumptions were based on time charter rates and forward
market rates for future periods where the vessels are not yet fixed. Operating expenses per day of
$4,563 were used for each owned Panamax and Handymax vessels bearing an annual increase of 3%
thereafter. The assessment concluded that step two of the impairment analysis was not required and
no impairment of
86
vessels existed as of December 31, 2008, as the undiscounted projected net operating cash
flows exceeded the carrying value.
Although the management believes the underlying assumptions supporting this assessment are
reasonable, if charter rate trends and the length of the current market downturn, vary
significantly from our forecasts, the management may be required to perform step two of the
impairment analysis in the future that could expose Navios Holdings to material impairment charges
in the future.
No impairment loss was recognized for any of the periods presented.
Vessels, net: Vessel acquisitions are stated at historical cost, which consists of the
contract price, any material expenses incurred upon acquisition (improvements and delivery
expenses). Subsequent expenditures for major improvements and upgrading are capitalized, provided
they appreciably extend the life, increase the earning capacity or improve the efficiency or safety
of the vessels. Expenditures for routine maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred.
Depreciation is computed using the straight line method over the useful life of the vessels,
after considering the estimated residual value. Management estimates the useful life of the
Companys vessels to be 25 years from the vessels original construction. However, when regulations
place limitations over the ability of a vessel to trade on a worldwide basis, its useful life is
re-estimated to end at the date such regulations become effective.
Deferred Dry-dock and Special Survey Costs: The Companys vessels, barges and push boats
are subject to regularly scheduled dry-docking and special surveys which are carried out every 30,
60, and 84 months for vessels and barges and push boats, respectively to coincide with the renewal
of the related certificates issued by the Classification Societies, unless a further extension is
obtained in rare cases and under certain conditions. The costs of dry-docking and special surveys
is deferred and amortized over the above periods or to the next dry-docking or special survey date
if such has been determined. Unamortized dry-docking or special survey costs of vessels, barges and
push boats sold are written off to income in the year the vessel, barge or push boat is sold. When
vessels are acquired the portion of the vessels capitalized cost that relates to dry-docking or
special survey is treated as a separate component of the vessels cost and is deferred and
amortized as above. This cost is determined by reference to the estimated economic benefits to be
derived until the next dry-docking or special survey.
Goodwill and Other Intangibles: As required by SFAS No. 142 Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets, goodwill acquired in a business combination initiated after June 30, 2001 is not to be
amortized. Similarly, intangible assets with indefinite lives are not amortized. Rather, SFAS 142
requires that goodwill be tested for impairment at least annually and written down with a charge to
operations if the carrying amount exceeds the estimated fair value.
The Company evaluates impairment of goodwill using a two-step process. First, the aggregate
fair value of the reporting unit is compared to its carrying amount, including goodwill. The
Company determines the fair value based on a combination of discounted cash flow analysis and an
industry market multiple.
If the fair value exceeds the carrying amount, no impairment exists. If the carrying amount of
the reporting unit exceeds the fair value, then the Company must perform the second step in order
to determine the implied fair value of the reporting units goodwill and compare it with its
carrying amount. The implied fair value is determined by allocating the fair value of the reporting
unit to all the assets and liabilities of that unit, as if the unit had been acquired in a business
combination and the fair value of the unit was the purchase price. If the carrying amount of the
goodwill exceeds the implied fair value, then goodwill impairment is recognized by writing the
goodwill down to the implied fair value.
During the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2008, management concluded that events occurred and
circumstances had changed, which may indicate the existence of potential impairment of Navios
Holdings goodwill. These indicators included a significant decline in Navios Holdings stock
price, continued deterioration in the spot market, and the related impact the current drybulk
sector has on managements expectation for future revenues. As a result, an interim impairment
assessment of goodwill was performed. Unless these indicators improve, it is likely that an interim
impairment analysis will be required to be performed in future quarters.
87
The interim testing was a review of the fair market value of the Company as compared to the
carrying value of its assets using a discounted cash flow model. The significant factors and
assumptions the Company used in its discounted cash flow analysis included: EBITDA, the discount
rate used to calculate the present value of future cash flows and future capital expenditures.
EBITDA assumptions included forward charter rates, general and administrative expense growth
assumptions, and direct vessel expenses growth assumptions. The Companys assessment concluded that
step 2 was not required and no impairment of goodwill existed in any of the periods presented as
the fair value exceeded carrying value. Although the Company believes its underlying assumptions
supporting this assessment are reasonable, if the Companys actual revenue, direct vessel expenses,
and general and administrative expenses, vary significantly from its forecasts, the Company may be
required to perform a step two analysis in the future that could expose the Company to material
impairment charges in the future.
The Company also considered as an indicator of fair market value its total market
capitalization based on the trading price of its common stock as of December 31, 2008. However,
given the extreme volatility in the stock market during the quarter ended December 31, 2008, as
well as the impact that the credit crisis and the recession had on the stock market during that
period, management concluded that it was appropriate to place more reliance on fair market value as
calculated by the Companys discounted cash flow model in evaluating goodwill impairment, rather
than the total market capitalization.
No impairment loss was recognized for any of the periods presented.
The fair value of the trade name was determined based on the relief from royalty method
which values the trade name based on the estimated amount that a company would have to pay in an
arms length transaction in order to use that trade name. The asset is being amortized under the
straight line method over 32 years. The fair value of customer relationships was determined based
on the excess earnings method, which relies upon the future cash flow generating ability of the
asset. The asset is amortized under the straight line method over 20 years. Other intangibles that
are being amortized, such as the amortizable portion of favorable leases, port terminal operating
rights, backlog assets and liabilities, would be considered impaired if their fair market value
could not be recovered from the future undiscounted cash flows associated with the asset. Vessel
purchase options, which are included in favorable lease terms, are not amortized and would be
considered impaired if the carrying value of an option, when added to the option price of the
vessel, exceeded the fair market value of the vessel.
Investment in available for sale securities: The Company classifies its existing marketable
equity securities as available-for-sale in accordance with provisions of SFAS 115 Accounting for
Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities. These securities are carried at fair market
value, with unrealized gains and losses excluded from earnings and reported directly in
stockholders equity as a component of other comprehensive income (loss) unless an unrealized loss
is considered other-than-temporary, in which case it is transferred to the statement of
income. Management evaluates securities for OTTI on a quarterly basis. Consideration is given to
(1) the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, (2) the
financial condition and near-term prospects of the investee, and (3) the intent and ability of the
Company to retain its investment in the investee for a period of time sufficient to allow for any
anticipated recovery in fair value.
As of December 31, 2008, the Companys unrealized holding losses in available for sale
securities were $22.6 million. Based on the Companys OTTI analysis, management considers the
decline in market valuation of these securities to be temporary. However, there is the potential
for future impairment charges relative to these equity securities if their fair values do not
recover and our OTTI analysis indicates such write downs are necessary. See Note 24 to the
consolidated financial statements appearing elsewhere in this document.
G. Safe Harbor
Applicable
to the extent the disclosures in Item 5.E and 5.F above require
the statutory safe harbor protections provided to forward-looking
statements.
Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees
A. Directors and Senior Management
The current board of directors, executive officers and significant employees are as follows:
88
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Age |
|
Position |
Angeliki Frangou
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer |
George Achniotis
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
Ted C. Petrone
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
President of Navios Corporation and Director |
Michael E. McClure
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
Senior Vice President Corporate Affairs |
Vasiliki Papaefthymiou
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
Executive Vice President Legal, Secretary and Director |
Anna Kalathakis
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
Senior Vice President Legal Risk Management |
Shunji Sasada*
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
Chief Operating Officer Navios Corporation |
Spyridon Magoulas
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
Director |
John Stratakis
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
Director |
Rex W. Harrington
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
Director |
Allan Shaw
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
Director |
Angeliki Frangou has been Navios Holdings Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
since August 25, 2005, the date of the acquisition of Navios Holdings by ISE. Prior to the
acquisition, Ms. Frangou was the Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of ISE from
September 2004 until ISEs acquisition of and merger into Navios Holdings. Ms. Frangou was the
chief executive officer of Maritime Enterprises Management S.A., a company located in Piraeus,
Greece that specializes in the management of dry cargo vessels of various types and sizes, from the
time she founded the company in October 2001 until August 2005. From 1990 to October 2001, Ms.
Frangou was the chief executive officer of Franser Shipping S.A., a company that was located in
Piraeus, Greece, and was also engaged in the management of dry cargo vessels. Prior to her
employment with Franser Shipping, Ms. Frangou was an analyst on the trading floor of Republic
National Bank of New York from 1987 to 1989. Ms. Frangou was also a member of the board of
directors of Emporiki Bank of Greece, the second largest retail bank in Greece, from April 2004 to
July 2005. Ms. Frangou is currently the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Navios Maritime
Partners L.P., a New York Stock Exchange traded limited partnership, which is an affiliate of
Navios Holdings. Ms. Frangou is currently the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Navios
Maritime Acquisition Corporation, a New York Stock Exchange listed company, and has served in such
position since June 2008. Ms. Frangou is also the Chairman of the board of directors of IRF
European Finance Investments Ltd., listed on the AIM of the London Stock Exchange. She was also
Chairman of the board of directors of Proton Bank, based in Athens, Greece, from June 2006 until
September 2008. Ms. Frangou is a member of the Mediterranean Committee of the China Classification
Society and a member of the Hellenic and Black Sea Committee of Bureau Veritas as well as a member
of Greek Committee of Nippon Kaiji Kyokai. Ms. Frangou received a bachelors degree in mechanical
engineering from Fairleigh Dickinson University (summa cum laude) and a masters degree in
mechanical engineering from Columbia University.
George Achniotis has been Navios Holdings Chief Financial Officer since April 12, 2007. Prior
to being appointed Chief Financial Officer of Navios Holdings, Mr. Achniotis served as Senior Vice
President-Business Development of Navios Holdings from August 2006 to April 2007. Before joining
Navios Holdings, Mr. Achniotis was a partner at PricewaterhouseCoopers in Greece, heading the
Piraeus office and the firms shipping practice. He became a partner at PwC in 1999 when he set up
and headed the firms internal audit services department from which all SOX implementation and
consultation projects were performed. Mr. Achniotis is currently the Executive Vice President-Business Development of Navios Maritime Partners L.P., a New York Stock Exchange traded limited
partnership, which is an affiliate of Navios Holdings, and Executive Vice President Business
Development of Navios Maritime Acquisition Corporation, a New York Stock Exchange listed company,
an affiliate of the Company; and has served in such capacity since June 2008. He has more than 19
years experience in the accounting profession with work experience in England, Cyprus and Greece.
Mr. Achniotis qualified as a Chartered Accountant in England and Wales in 1991 and he holds a
Bachelors degree in Civil Engineering from the University of Manchester.
89
Ted C. Petrone became a director of Navios Holdings in May 2007, having become President of
Navios Corporation in September 2006. He heads Navios
Holdings worldwide commercial operations. Mr. Petrone served in the maritime industry for 31 years, of which 28 were with Navios
Holdings. After joining Navios Holdings as an assistant vessel operator, Mr. Petrone worked in
various operational and commercial positions. For the last fifteen years, Mr. Petrone was
responsible for all the aspects of the daily commercial Panamax activity, encompassing the trading
of tonnage, derivative hedge positions and cargoes. Mr. Petrone is currently also President of
Navios Maritime Acquisition Corporation, A New York Stock Exchange listed company, and an affiliate
of the Company; and has served in such capacity since June 2008. Mr. Petrone graduated from New
York Maritime College at Fort Schuyler with a B.S. in Maritime Transportation. He served aboard
U.S. Navy (Military Sealift Command) tankers.
Michael E. McClure has been Senior Vice President Corporate Affairs since April and was the
Chief Financial Officer of Navios Holdings from October 1, 2005 to April 2007. Prior to that date,
Mr. McClure was Vice President Research & Risk Management of Navios Corporation where he was
responsible for derivative trading strategies, economic research and various commercial functions.
Mr. McClure joined Navios Holdings in 1978 while the Company was a wholly-owned subsidiary of U.S.
Steel. He held various positions throughout the Company including Manager of Financial Analysis and
Director of South American Transportation Projects, which included Navios Holdings owned port
facility in Uruguay and its commercial lead in Venezuela and Columbia. Mr. McClure is currently the
Chief Financial Officer of Navios Maritime Partners L.P, a New York Stock Exchange traded limited
partnership, which is an affiliate of Navios Holdings. He is a board member of The Baltic Exchange
and the prior chairman of the Baltic Exchange Freight Market Indices Committee, which is the
organization responsible for all freight indices utilized for freight derivative trading by the
industry. Mr. McClure graduated from St. Marys college with a B.A. and Marquette University,
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, with an M.B.A.
Vasiliki Papaefthymiou has been a member of Navios Holdings board of directors since its
inception, and prior to that was a member of the board of directors of ISE. Ms. Papaefthymiou has
served as general counsel for Maritime Enterprises since October 2001, where she has advised the
company on shipping, corporate and finance legal matters. Ms. Papaefthymiou provided similar
services as general counsel to Franser Shipping from October 1991 to September 2001. Ms.
Papaefthymiou received her undergraduate degree from the Law School of the University of Athens and
a Masters degree in Maritime Law from Southampton University in the United Kingdom. Ms.
Papaefthymiou is admitted to practice law before the Bar in Piraeus, Greece.
Anna Kalathakis has been Senior Vice President Legal Risk Management of Navios Holdings
since December 8, 2005. Before joining Navios Holdings, Ms. Kalathakis was the General Manager of
the Greek office of a Bilbrough & Co LTD and an associate director of the company (Managers of the
London Steam-Ship Owners Mutual Insurance Association Limited). She has previously worked for a
U.S. maritime law firm in New Orleans, admitted to practice law in the state of Louisiana in 1995,
and has also worked in a similar capacity at a London maritime law firm. She qualified as a
solicitor in England and Wales in 1999 and was admitted to the Piraeus BAR, Greece in 2003. She has
studied International Relations at Georgetown University, Washington D.C. (1991). She holds an MBA
from European University at Brussels (1992) and a J.D. from Tulane Law School (1995).
Shunji Sasada became Chief Operating Officer of Navios Corporation in June 2007. Previously,
as Senior Vice President of Fleet Development, he headed Navios Holdings program for the growth
and development of the Companys long term chartered-in and owned tonnage. Mr. Sasada remains
President of Navimax Corporation, the Ultra Handymax operating subsidiary of the group. Mr. Sasada
started his shipping career in 1981 in Japan with Mitsui O.S.K. Lines, Ltd. (MOSK). Mr.
Sasadas first position with MOSK was in steel products in the Tokyo branch as a salesman for
exporting steel products to worldwide destinations. Two years later, Mr. Sasada moved to the tramp
section in Mitsuis bulk carrier division and was in charge of operations and then of chartering
20-40 smaller Handysize vessels between 21,000 dwt and 35,000 dwt. In 1991, Mr. Sasada moved to
Norway to join Trinity Bulk Carriers as its chartering manager as well as subsidiary board member,
representing MOSK as one of the shareholders. After an assignment in Norway, Mr. Sasada moved to
London and started MOSKs own Ultra Handymax operation as its General Manager. Mr. Sasada joined
Navios Holdings in May 1997. He is a graduate of Keio University, Tokyo, with a B.A. degree in
Business.
Spyridon Magoulas has been a member of Navios Holdings board of directors since its
inception, and prior to that was a member of the board of directors of ISE. Mr. Magoulas is the
co-founder and director of Doric Shipbrokers S.A., a chartering firm in the dry cargo vessel
business based in Athens, Greece, and has served as the managing director of that company since its formation
in 1994. From 1982 to 1993, Mr. Magoulas was a chartering director and shipbroker for Nicholas G.
Moundreas Shipping S.A., a company located in Piraeus, Greece, and from 1980 to 1982, Mr. Magoulas
served at Orion and Global Chartering Inc. in New York. Mr. Magoulas also is a member of the
Association of Ship Brokers and Agents in the United States. Mr. Magoulas received a Bachelors
degree in Economics (honors) from the City University of New York, New York, a Masters degree in
Transportation Management from the Maritime College in New York and a Masters degree in Political
Economy from the New School for Social Research in New York. In addition to his role on the Board
of Directors, Mr. Magoulas also serves as a member of the Audit Committee, the Compensation
Committee and the Nominating and Governance Committee. Mr. Magoulas is an independent director.
90
John Stratakis has been a member of Navios Holdings board of directors since its inception,
and prior to that was a member of the board of directors of ISE. Since 1994, Mr. Stratakis has been
a partner with the law firm of Poles, Tublin, Stratakis & Gonzalez, LLP, in New York, New York,
where he specializes in all aspects of marine finance and admiralty law, real estate, trusts and
estates and general corporate law. From 1992 to 1993, Mr. Stratakis was an associate attorney with
Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker, in New York, New York. Mr. Stratakis also has been a
director and the President of the Hellenic American Chamber of Commerce in New York. He serves on
the board of New York Maritime Inc., an association that promotes the New York region as a maritime
business center. Mr. Stratakis received a Bachelor of Arts (summa cum laude) from Trinity College
and a Juris Doctor degree from Washington College of Law American University. Mr. Stratakis is
admitted to practice law in the State of New York and in the courts of the Southern and Eastern
Districts of New York. In addition to his role on the Board of Directors, Mr. Stratakis also serves
as a member of the Nominating and Governance Committee and a member of the Compensation Committee.
Mr. Stratakis is an independent director.
Rex W. Harrington has been a member of Navios Holdings board of directors since October 25
2005. Mr. Harrington served as shipping advisor to the Royal Bank of Scotland plc from 1998 until
2001. Mr. Harrington served as Director of Shipping of the Royal Bank of Scotland plc from 1990,
to 1998, Assistant General Manager, Shipping from 1980 to 1990 and Senior Manager, Shipping from
1973 to 1980. From 1969 to 1973, Mr. Harrington served as an executive of Baring Bothers & Co.,
Ltd., an international merchant banking firm, and, from 1957 to 1969, served in various capacities
in the Bank of England. Mr. Harrington currently serves as a director of General Maritime
Corporation., a company listed on the New York Stock Exchange, and is a senior consultant to the
Bank of America on shipping. He is a member of the General Committee of Lloyds Register, the
London Advisory Panel of InterCargo, the Baltic Exchange and the Steering Committee of the London
Shpping Law Centre. Mr. Harrington is a deputy chairman of the International Maritime Industries
Forum. He was a director of Dampskibsselspaket TORM, a company listed on the NASDAQ National
Market and the Copenhagen Stock Exchange from 2003 to 2006, Clarksons (International Shipbrokers)
quoted on the London Stock Exchange from 1995 to 1998, and a director of Lloyds Register from 1994
to 1999. Mr. Harrington has a Masters degree from the University of Oxford. In addition to his role
on the Board of Directors, Mr. Harrington also serves as Chairman of the Nominating and Governance
Committee and a member of the Audit Committee. Mr. Harrington is an independent director.
Allan Shaw has been a member of Navios Holdings board of directors since October 25, 2005, He
has over 20 years of financial management experience. Mr. Shaw is the Founder and Senior Managing
Director of Shaw Strategic Capital LLC, an international financial advisory firm. From November
2002 to April 2004, Mr. Shaw was the Chief Financial Officer and Executive Management Board Member
at Serono International S.A., a global biotechnology company. Prior to joining Serono, Mr. Shaw
was with Viatel Inc., an international telecommunications company, where he was a member of the
board of directors and Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Shaw, a United States Certified Public
Accountant, was also a manager with Deloitte & Touche and received a Bachelor of Science degree
from the State University of New York, Oswego in 1986. In addition to his role on the Board of
Directors, Mr. Shaw also serves as Chairman of the Audit Committee and the Chairman of the
Compensation Committee. Mr. Shaw is an independent director.
B. Compensation
The aggregate annual compensation paid to our current executive officers was approximately
$3,402,173 for the year ended December 31, 2008. We also made contributions for our executive
officers to a 401(k) in an aggregate amount of approximately $42,567.
In December 2006, our shareholders approved the adoption of the Navios Maritime Holdings Inc. 2006 Employee,
Directors and Consultants Stock Plan (the 2006 Plan). The 2006 Plan authorizes the issuance of
stock grants to our employees, directors and consultants in such amounts and pursuant to such terms
as may be determined by the Board of Directors at the time of the grant. As of the filing of this
Annual Report on Form 20-F under the 2006 Plan, 859,266 stock options to purchase the Companys
common stock have been issued of which 96,000 have vested. 288,000 options were granted at an
exercise price of $16.75 per share, and 571,266 options were granted at an exercise price of $3.18
per share. In addition, 461,280 shares of restricted stock have been issued of which 79,858 have
vested and 1,083 were forfeited. Restricted stock is granted to employees and is restricted for a
two-year period. This restriction lapses in two equal tranches over the requisite service periods
of one and two years from the grant date. Stock options have been granted to executive directors
only and vest in three equal tranches over the requisite period of one, two and three years from
the grant date. Each option remains exercisable for 7 years after its vesting date. Non-employee
directors receive annual fees in the amount of $45,000 each plus reimbursement of their
out-of-pocket expenses. In addition, the non-executive serving as chairman of the Audit Committee
receives an annual fee of $20,000, the chairman of the Nominating and Governance Committee receives
an annual fee of $17,000, plus reimbursement of their out-of-pocket expenses, and the chairman of
the Compensation Committee receives an annual fee of $20,000, plus reimbursement of their
out-of-pocket expenses.
91
C. Board Practices
The board of directors of Navios Holdings is divided into three classes with only one class of
directors being elected in each year and each class serving a three-year term. The term of office
of the first class of directors, consisting of John Stratakis, Rex Harrington and Allan Shaw, was
renewed at the annual meeting of stockholders held in December 2006, and its term will expire in
2009. The term of office of the second class of directors, consisting of Ted C. Petrone and
Spyridon Magoulas, was renewed at the annual meeting of stockholders held in December 2007, and its
term will expire in 2010. The term of office of the third class of directors, consisting of
Angeliki Frangou and Vasiliki Papaefthymiou, was renewed at the annual meeting of stockholders held
in November 2008, and its term will expire in 2011. No directors are entitled to any benefits upon
termination of their term.
The board of directors has established an audit committee of three independent directors. The
audit committee is governed by a written charter, which was approved by the board of directors. One
of the members of the audit committee is an audit committee financial expert for purposes of SEC
rules and regulations. The audit committee, among other things, reviews our external financial
reporting, engages our external auditors, approves all fees paid to auditors and oversees our
internal audit activities and procedures and the adequacy of our internal accounting controls. Our
audit committee is comprised of Messrs. Allan Shaw, Rex Harrington and Spyridon Magoulas, and our
audit committee financial expert is Mr. Shaw.
The board of directors has established a nominating and governance committee of three
independent directors, Messrs. Rex Harrington, who serves as a Chairman, Spyridon Magoulas and John
Stratakis. This committee is governed by a written charter, which was approved by the board of
directors. The nominating and governance committee is responsible for providing assistance to the
board of directors in fulfilling its responsibility to the Companys stockholders relating to the
Companys nominating procedures and practices for appointing officers and directors as well as the
Companys oversight, analysis and recommendations with respect to corporate governance and best
practices, and the Companys process for monitoring compliance with laws and regulations.
In July 2007, the board of directors appointed a compensation committee consisting of three
independent directors, Messrs. Allan Shaw, who serves as a Chairman, Spyridon Magoulas and John
Stratakis. The compensation committee is governed by a written charter, which was approved by the
board of directors. The compensation committee is responsible for reviewing and approving the
compensation of the Companys executive officers, for establishing, reviewing and evaluating, in
consultation with senior management, the long term strategy of employee compensation and approving
any material change to existing compensation plans.
D. Employees
Navios
Holdings crews its vessels primarily with Greek, Ukrainian, and Georgian officers and Filipino, Georgian, Bulgarian, Polish and Ukrainian seamen. Navios Holdings fleet manager is
responsible for selecting its Greek officers, who are hired by Navios Holdings vessel-owning
subsidiaries. Other nationalities are referred to Navios Holdings fleet manager by local crewing
agencies. The crewing agencies handle each seamans training, travel, and payroll. Navios Holdings
requires that all of its seamen have the qualifications and licenses required to comply with
international regulations and shipping conventions.
92
Navios Logistics crews its fleet with Argentinean and Paraguayan officers and seamen. Navios
Logistics fleet managers are responsible for selecting the crew.
With respect to shore side employees, Navios Holdings employs 13 employees in its
South Norwalk, Connecticut office, 85 employees in its Piraeus, Greece office, and 12 employees in
its Antwerp, Belgium office. Navios Logistics employs 39 employees in its Asuncion, Paraguay
offices, with an additional 24 employees working at the port facility in San Antonio, 67 office
employees in the Buenos Aires, Argentina office, six employees in its Montevideo, Uruguay office,
and an additional 95 employees working at the port facility in Nueva Palmira.
E. Share Ownership
The following table sets forth information regarding the beneficial ownership of the common
stock of Navios Holdings as of April 13, 2009, based on 100,225,217 shares of common stock
outstanding as of such day, by each of Navios Holdings executive officers and directors.
Unless otherwise indicated, Navios Holdings believes that all persons named in the table have
sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of common stock beneficially owned by
them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount and Nature |
|
Percentage of |
|
|
of Beneficial |
|
Outstanding |
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner(1) |
|
Ownership |
|
Common Stock |
Angeliki Frangou(2) |
|
|
23,406,589 |
|
|
|
23.3 |
% |
George Achniotis |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
* |
|
Michael E. McClure |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
* |
|
Vasiliki Papaefthymiou |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
* |
|
Anna Kalathakis |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
* |
|
Ted C. Petrone |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
* |
|
Spyridon Magoulas |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
* |
|
John Stratakis |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
* |
|
Rex Harrington |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
* |
|
Allan Shaw |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Less than one percent |
|
(1) |
|
The business address of each of the individuals is 85 Akti Miaouli Street, Piraeus Greece 185 38. |
|
(2) |
|
Angeliki Frangou has filed a Schedule 13D amendment indicating that she intends, subject to market conditions,
to purchase up to $20 million of common stock and as of
October 10, 2005, she had purchased approximately
$10.0 million in value of common stock. |
Under Navios Holdings 2006 Plan, the following options to purchase the Companys common stock
have been granted to the persons mentioned in the table above:
On October 18, 2007, 288,000 options were granted at an exercise price of $16.75 per share,
and on December 16, 2008, 571,266 options were granted at an exercise price of $3.18, all based on
service conditions only.
As of December 31, 2008, no options have been exercised.
93
The stock options vest in three equal tranches over a three-year period from the grant date.
Each option remains exercisable seven years after its vesting date.
Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions
A. Major Shareholders
The following table sets forth information regarding the beneficial ownership of the common
stock of Navios Holdings as of April 13, 2009, based on 100,225,217 shares of common stock
outstanding as of such date of each person known by Navios Holdings to be the beneficial owner of
more than 5% of its outstanding shares of common stock based upon the amounts and
percentages as are contained in the public filings of such persons. All such stockholders have the
same voting rights with respect to their shares of common stock.
Unless otherwise indicated, Navios Holdings believes that all persons named in the table have
sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of common stock beneficially owned by
them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount and |
|
|
|
|
Nature of |
|
Percentage of |
|
|
Beneficial |
|
Outstanding |
Name |
|
Ownership |
|
Common Stock |
Angeliki Frangou |
|
|
23,406,589 |
|
|
23.3% |
FMR LLC(1) |
|
|
11,077,283 |
|
|
11.0% |
Oceanic Investment Management Limited |
|
|
6,448,700 |
|
|
6.4% |
Golden Ocean Group Limited |
|
|
5,275,145 |
|
|
5.3% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Disclaims beneficial ownership except to the extent of its pecuniary interest. |
B. Related Party Transactions
Leases: On January 2, 2006, Navios Corporation and Navios ShipManagement Inc., two wholly
owned subsidiaries of Navios Holdings, entered into two lease agreements with Goldland
Ktimatiki-Ikodomiki-Touristiki and Xenodohiaki Anonimos Eteria, a Greek corporation which is
partially owned by relatives of Angeliki Frangou, Navios Holdings Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer. The lease agreements provide for the leasing of two facilities located in Piraeus, Greece,
of approximately 2,034.3 square meters and houses the operations of most of the Companys
subsidiaries. The total annual lease payments are EUR 0.4 million (approximately $0.6 million) and
the lease agreements expire in 2017. The Company believes the terms and provisions of the lease
agreements were the same as those that would have been agreed with an unrelated third party. These
payments are subject to annual adjustments starting from the third year which are based on the
inflation rate prevailing in Greece as reported by the Greek State at the end of each year.
On October 31, 2007, Navios ShipManagement Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Navios Holdings,
entered into a lease agreement with Emerald Ktimatiki-Ikodomiki-Touristiki and Xenodohiaki Anonimos
Eteria, a Greek corporation that is partially owned by relatives of Angeliki Frangou, Navios
Holdings Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. The lease agreement provides for the leasing of one
facility in Piraeus, Greece of approximately 1,367.5 square meters and houses part of the
operations of the Company. The total annual lease payments are EUR 0.4 million (approximately $0.6
million) and the lease agreement expires in 2019. These payments are subject to annual adjustments
starting from the third year, which are based on the inflation rate prevailing in Greece as
reported by the Greek State at the end of each year.
Acropolis: The Company utilizes Acropolis Chartering and Shipping Inc. (Acropolis) as a
broker. Navios Holdings has a 50% interest in Acropolis Chartering & Shipping, Inc.
(Acropolis), a brokerage firm for freight and shipping charters. Although Navios Holdings owns
50% of the stock, the two shareholders have agreed that the earnings and amounts declared by way of
dividends, will be allocated 35% to the Company with the balance to the other shareholder. As of
December 31, 2008 and 2007, the carrying amount of the investment was $0.7 million and $1.0
million, respectively. Dividends received for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 were
$1.9 million, $0.7 million, and
$0.6 million, respectively. Commissions paid to Acropolis for each of the years ended December
31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, were $1.7 million, $0.4 million, and $0.2 million, respectively. The
amount due to Acropolis and included in trade accounts payable at December 31, 2008 and 2007 was
$0.2 million and $0.4 million, respectively.
94
Stock Transactions: On June 6, 2006, Ms. Angeliki Frangou participated in Navios Holdings
warrant exercise transaction and paid approximately $27.3 million to Navios Holdings to exercise
warrants in respect of 6,666,280 shares of common stock. Unlike the other warrant holders who
participated in the warrant exercise transaction, Ms. Frangous shares are not registered for
resale.
Management fees: Pursuant to a management agreement dated November 16, 2007, Navios
Holdings provides commercial and technical management services to Navios Partners vessels for a
daily fee of $4,000 per owned Panamax vessel and $5,000 per owned Capesize vessel. This daily fee
covers all of the vessels operating expenses, including the cost of drydock and special surveys.
The daily rates are fixed for a period of two years whereas the initial term of the agreement is
five years commencing from November 16, 2007. Total management fees for the year ended December 31,
2008 and 2007 amounted to $9.3 million and $0.9 million, respectively.
General & administrative expenses: Pursuant to the administrative services agreement dated
November 16, 2007, Navios Holdings provides administrative services to Navios Partners which
include: bookkeeping, audit and accounting services, legal and insurance services, administrative
and clerical services, banking and financial services, advisory services, client and investor
relations and other. Navios Holdings is reimbursed for reasonable costs and expenses incurred in
connection with the provision of these services. Total general and administrative fees charged for
the year ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 amounted to $1.5 million and $0.2 million, respectively.
Balance due from affiliate: The balance due from affiliate as at December 31, 2008 amounted
to $1.7 million (2007: $4.5 million) which represents the current amount of $1.5 million (2007:
$4.5 million) due from Navios Partners. The balance mainly consists of management fees,
administrative service fees and other expenses. The balance of 2007 relates to the IPO expenses
paid on behalf of Navios Partners amounting to $3.8 million, as well as management fees,
administrative service fees and other expenses amounting to $0.6 million. (For details relating to
Navios Partners IPO please see Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.)
Sale of Navios Aurora I: On July 1, 2008, Navios Aurora I was sold to Navios
Partners. The sale price consisted of $35.0 million in cash and $44.9 million in common units
(3,131,415 common units) of Navios Partners. The investment in the 3,131,415 common units has been
classified Investments in available for sale securities. The gain from the sale of Navios Aurora
I was $51.5 million of which $24.9 million has been recognized at the time of sale in the
statements of income under Gain on sale of assets. The remaining $26.6 million, which represents
profit to the extent of Navios Holdings ownership interest in Navios Partners, has been deferred
under Long term liabilities and amortized over the remaining life of the vessel or until the
vessel is sold.
Navios Acquisition: On July 1, 2008, Navios Holdings purchased 7,600,000 warrants from
Navios Acquisition for a total consideration of $7.6 million ($1.00 per warrant) in the private
placement that occurred simultaneously with the completion of Navios Acquisitions IPO. Each
warrant entitles the holder to purchase from Navios Acquisition one share of common
stock at an exercise price of $7.00. Prior to the IPO, Navios Holdings had purchased 8,625,000
Sponsor Units for a total consideration of $25,000, of which an aggregate of 290,000 were
transferred to the Companys officers and directors and an aggregate of 2,300,000 Sponsor Units
were returned to Navios Acquisition and cancelled upon receipt. Each unit consists of one share of
Navios Acquisitions common stock and one warrant.
On March 31, 2008, Navios Holdings provided a non-interest bearing loan of $0.5 million to
Navios Acquisition, which was repaid in full during 2008.
Navios Acquisition presently occupies office space provided by Navios Holdings. Navios
Holdings has agreed that, until the consummation of a business combination, it will make such
office space available for use by Navios Acquisition, as well as certain office and secretarial
services as may be required from time to time. Navios Acquisition has agreed to pay Navios Holdings
$10,000 per month for such services; the charge is included in general and administrative expenses.
Total general
and administrative fees charged for the year ended December 31, 2008 amounted to $0.1 million
(2007: $0). As of December 31, 2008, the balance due from Navios Acquisition was $0.1 million.
95
C. Interests of experts and counsel.
Not applicable.
Item 8. Financial Information
A. Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information
Consolidated Financial Statements: See Item 18.
Legal Proceedings: Navios Holdings is not involved in any legal proceedings that it
believes will have a significant effect on its business, financial position, results of operations
or liquidity.
On November 30, 2006, we received notification that one of our FFA trading counter-parties
filed for bankruptcy in Canada. Our exposure to such counterparty was estimated to be approximately
$7.7 million. While the recovery we may obtain in any liquidation proceeding cannot be presently
estimated, based on managements current expectations and assumptions we have provided for $5.4
million in our 2006 financial statements and $0.5 million additional provision in our 2008
financial statements. As of December 31, 2008, an amount of $1.1 million has been recovered. No
further information has developed since then which would change our expectations and assumptions
either to increase or decrease the provision. However, we do not believe this will have a material
impact on our liquidity, or on our ability to make payments for principal and interest or otherwise
service our debt.
From time to time, Navios Holdings may be subject to legal proceedings and claims in the
ordinary course of business. It is expected that these claims would be covered by insurance if they
involve liabilities such as arise from a collision, other marine casualty, damage to cargoes, oil
pollution, death or personal injuries to crew, subject to customary deductibles. Those claims, even
if lacking merit, could result in the expenditure of significant financial and managerial
resources.
Dividend Policy: At the present time, Navios Holdings intends to retain most of its
available earnings generated by operations for the development and growth of the business. The
declaration and payment of any dividend remains subject to the discretion of the Board of
Directors, and will depend on, among other things, Navios Holdings cash requirements as measured
by market opportunities and conditions. In addition, the terms and provisions of our current
secured credit facilities and our indenture limit our ability to pay dividends in excess of certain
amounts or if certain covenants are not met. (See also Long Term Debt Obligations and Credit
Arrangements.)
On February 14, 2008, the Board of Directors declared a dividend of approximately $9.6 million
in respect of the fourth quarter of 2007 of $0.09 per common share
which was paid on March 18, 2008 to
stockholders on record as of March 10, 2008.
On May 27, 2008, the Board of Directors declared a dividend of approximately $9.6 million in
respect of the first quarter of 2008 of $0.09 per common share which
was paid on June 30, 2008 to
stockholders on record as of June 18, 2008.
On August 18, 2008, the Board of Directors declared a dividend of approximately $9.6 million
in respect of the second quarter of 2008 of $0.09 per common share
which was paid on September 12, 2008 to
stockholders on record as of September 2, 1008.
On November 14, 2008, the Board of Directors declared a dividend of approximately $9.1 million
in respect of the third quarter of 2008 of $0.09 per common share
which was paid on January 6, 2009 to
stockholders on record as of December 22, 2008.
On February 13, 2009, the Board of Directors declared a dividend of approximately $6.0 million
in respect of the fourth quarter of 2008 of $0.06 per common share
which was paid on April 3, 2009 to
stockholders on record as of March 16, 2009.
96
B. Significant Changes
Not applicable.
Item 9. Listing Details
Since
February 22, 2007, the principal trading market for our
securities has been the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE)
under the symbols NM, currently for our common stock,
and NMWS prior to December 9, 2008 for our warrants. As of February 22, 2007, the Companys common stock and warrants were
no longer trading as a unit. In addition, on December 9, 2008, our publicly traded warrants expired
and ceased to be publicly traded. For the period from November 3, 2005 to February 22, 2007 our
common stock, warrants and units were trading in the Nasdaq National Market (NASDAQ) under the
symbols BULK, BULKW and BULKU, respectively. Prior to November 3, 2005, the principal
trading market of our securities was the Over-The-Counter Bulletin Board (OTCBB).
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the reported high and low quoted
closing prices of our common stock, warrants and units on the New York Stock Exchange after
February 22, 2007, on Nasdaq National Market from November 3, 2005 to February 22, 2007 and on the
OTC Bulletin Board prior to such time but after December 10, 2004, the date that our legal
predecessor, ISE, first became a public company. Prior to August 25, 2005, the date on which ISE
acquired us and subsequently merged with and into us, Navios Holdings was a privately held company
and there was no public trading market for our securities, the information presented below prior to
that date reflects the trading activity of ISE, our legal predecessor. The information presented
subsequent to August 25, 2005 reflects our trading activity of us for the period subsequent to us
becoming a publicly traded company. Prior to December 10, 2004, there was no established public
trading market for our common stock.
On
April 13, 2009, the closing price of our common stock was $2.59. The quotations listed
below reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail markup, markdown or commission, and may not
necessarily represent actual transactions:
97
(a) For
the four most recent full financial years: the annual high and low market prices:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
Warrants(*) |
|
Units |
Year Ended |
|
High |
|
Low |
|
High |
|
Low |
|
High |
|
Low |
December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
14.95 |
|
|
$ |
1.10 |
|
|
$ |
9.91 |
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
19.76 |
|
|
$ |
5.21 |
|
|
$ |
14.75 |
|
|
$ |
0.87 |
|
|
$ |
14.90 |
|
|
$ |
6.91 |
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
$ |
5.56 |
|
|
$ |
5.18 |
|
|
$ |
1.12 |
|
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
|
$ |
13.59 |
|
|
$ |
4.35 |
|
December 31, 2005 |
|
$ |
4.83 |
|
|
$ |
4.51 |
|
|
$ |
1.25 |
|
|
$ |
0.58 |
|
|
$ |
5.96 |
|
|
$ |
5.57 |
|
(b) For the two most recent full financial years and any subsequent period: the high and
low market prices for each financial quarter:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
Warrants(*) |
|
Units |
Quarter Ended |
|
High |
|
Low |
|
High |
|
Low |
|
High |
|
Low |
March 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
4.75 |
|
|
$ |
1.68 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
5.23 |
|
|
$ |
1.10 |
|
|
$ |
2.87 |
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
$ |
10.62 |
|
|
$ |
4.65 |
|
|
$ |
5.59 |
|
|
$ |
1.00 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
$ |
14.95 |
|
|
$ |
9.00 |
|
|
$ |
9.91 |
|
|
$ |
4.01 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
12.99 |
|
|
$ |
7.74 |
|
|
$ |
8.12 |
|
|
$ |
3.35 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
19.76 |
|
|
$ |
11.31 |
|
|
$ |
14.75 |
|
|
$ |
6.60 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2007 |
|
$ |
15.51 |
|
|
$ |
9.43 |
|
|
$ |
10.50 |
|
|
$ |
4.50 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2007 |
|
$ |
12.13 |
|
|
$ |
7.18 |
|
|
$ |
7.07 |
|
|
$ |
2.50 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
8.45 |
|
|
$ |
5.21 |
|
|
$ |
3.42 |
|
|
$ |
0.87 |
|
|
$ |
14.90 |
|
|
$ |
6.91 |
|
(c) For
the most recent six months: the high and low market prices for each month:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
Warrants(*) |
|
Month Ended |
|
High |
|
Low |
|
High |
|
Low |
March 2009 |
|
$ |
2.80 |
|
|
$ |
1.68 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
February 2009 |
|
$ |
4.75 |
|
|
$ |
2.02 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
January 2009 |
|
$ |
4.35 |
|
|
$ |
3.15 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
December 2008 |
|
$ |
4.63 |
|
|
$ |
1.58 |
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
November 2008 |
|
$ |
3.14 |
|
|
$ |
1.10 |
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
October 2008 |
|
$ |
5.23 |
|
|
$ |
2.46 |
|
|
$ |
2.87 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
|
|
(*) |
|
The warrants ceased to be publicly traded upon their expiration on December 9, 2008. |
98
Item 10. Additional Information
A. Share Capital
Not applicable.
B. Memorandum of articles of association
Please refer to Exhibit 3.1 of Form F-1, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on November 2, 2005 with file number 333-129382, and Exhibit 99.1 of Form 6-K, filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on January 17, 2007 with file number 000-51047, which the
Company hereby incorporates by reference.
C. Material Contracts
Please refer to Item 4.B for a discussion of our option agreements to purchase 12 chartered-in
vessels and seven newbuild Capesize vessels and to Item 5.F for a discussion of the long term debt,
the operating lease obligations and the rent obligations. Other than these agreements, the Company
has no material contracts, other than the contracts entered into in the ordinary course of
business, to which the Company or any of its subsidiaries is a party.
D. Exchange controls
Under the laws of the of the Marshall Islands, Uruguay, Liberia, Panama, Belgium, Luxembourg,
Malta, and Paraguay, the countries of incorporation of the Company and its subsidiaries, there are
currently no restrictions on the export or import of capital, including foreign exchange controls,
or restrictions that affect the remittance of dividends, interest or other payments to non-resident
holders of our common stock. In the case of Argentina, however, it should be noted that there are
foreign exchange restrictions that may affect the export or import of capital, the remittance of
dividends, interest or other payments to non-resident holders of common stock of local companies.
E. Taxation
Marshall Islands Tax Considerations
Navios Holdings is incorporated in the Marshall Islands. Under current Marshall Islands law,
Navios Holdings will not be subject to tax on income or capital gains, and no Marshall Islands
withholding tax will be imposed upon payments.
Other Tax Jurisdictions
Certain of Navios Holdings subsidiaries are incorporated in countries which impose taxes,
such as Malta and Belgium, however such taxes are immaterial to Navios Holdings operations.
Navios Logistics subsidiaries are incorporated in countries which impose taxes, such as
Argentina, Uruguay and Paraguay. Relating to the Argentinean subsidiaries, income tax liabilities
for the current and prior periods are measured at the amount expected to be paid to the taxation
authorities, using a tax rate of 35% on the taxable net income. Tax rates and tax laws used to
assess the income tax liability are those that are effective on the close of the fiscal period.
Additionally, at the end of the fiscal year local companies in Argentina have to calculate an
assets tax (Impuesto a la Ganancia Mínima Presunta or Alternative Minimum Income Tax). This is a
1% tax applicable over the gross value of the corporate assets (based on tax law criteria). Income
tax liability of a given fiscal year is creditable against the Alternative Minimum Income Tax
liability of such year. Relating to the Paraguayan subsidiaries there are two possible options to
determine the income tax liability. In the first option income tax liabilities for the current and
prior periods are measured at the amount expected to be paid to the taxation authorities, using the
tax rate of 10% on the fiscal profit and loss. 50% of revenues derived from international freights
are considered Paraguayan sourced (and therefore taxed) if carried between Paraguay and Argentina,
Bolivia, Brazil or Uruguay, In any other case, only 30% of revenues derived from international
freights are considered Paraguayan sourced. Companies whose operations are considered international
freights can choose to pay income taxes on their revenues at an
effective tax rate of 1% on such revenues, without considering any other kind of adjustments. Fiscal
losses, if any, are neither deducted nor carried forward.
99
Federal Income Tax Consequences
General
The following discussion addresses certain United States federal income tax aspects of our
business and considerations for the holders of our common stock. It does not address other tax
aspects (including issues arising under state, local and foreign tax laws other than the Marshall
Islands), nor does it attempt to address the specific circumstances of any particular stockholder
of Navios Holdings.
United States Federal Income Tax Considerations
Taxation of Operating Income: In General
Navios Holdings is incorporated under the laws of the Marshall Islands. Accordingly, it is
taxed as a foreign corporation by the United States. If Navios Holdings were taxed as a United
States corporation, it could be subject to substantially greater United States income tax than
contemplated below. See Risk Factors.
In general, a foreign corporation is subject to United States tax on income that is treated as
derived from U.S. source income or that is effectively connected income. Based on its current
plans, however, Navios Holdings expects that its income from sources within the United States will
be international shipping income that qualifies for exemption from United States federal income
taxation under Section 883 of the Code and the Shipping and Aircraft Agreement between the United
States and the Marshall Islands, and that it will have no effectively connected income.
Accordingly, Navios Holdings does not expect to be subject to federal income tax on any of its
income.
If Navios Holdings is taxed as a foreign corporation and the benefits of Code Section 883 and
the Shipping and Aircraft Agreement are unavailable, Navios Holdings United States source shipping
income that is not effectively connected income would be subject to a four percent (4%) tax imposed
by Section 887 of the Code on a gross basis, without the benefit of deductions. Navios Holdings
believes that no more than fifty percent (50%) of Navios Holdings shipping income would be treated
as United States source shipping income because, under Navios Holdings current business plan, its
shipping income will be attributable to transportation which does not both begin and end in the
United States. Thus, the maximum effective rate of United States federal income tax on Navios
Holdings shipping income would never exceed two percent (2%) of gross income under the four
percent (4%) gross basis tax regime.
To the extent the benefits of Code Section 883 exemption are unavailable and Navios Holdings
international shipping income is considered to be effectively connected income, such income, net of
applicable deductions, would be subject to the United States federal corporate income tax. United
States corporate income tax would also apply to any other effectively connected income of Navios
Holdings and to Navios Holdings worldwide income if it were taxed as a domestic corporation. This
could result in the imposition of a tax of up to 35% on Navios Holdings income, except to the
extent that Navios Holdings were able to take advantage of more favorable rates that may be imposed
on shipping income of domestic corporations or foreign corporations. In addition, as a foreign
corporation, Navios Holdings could potentially be subject to the thirty percent (30%) branch
profits on effectively connected income, as determined after allowance for certain adjustments, and
on certain interest paid or deemed paid attributable to the conduct of its United States trade or
business. Since Navios Holdings does not intend to have any vessel sailing to or from the United
States on a regularly scheduled basis, Navios Holdings believes that none of its international
shipping income will be effectively connected income.
United States Taxation of Gain on Sale of Vessels
Regardless of whether Navios Holdings qualifies for exemption under Code Section 883, it will
not be subject to United States federal income taxation with respect to gain realized on a sale of
a vessel, provided that the sale is considered to occur outside of the United States as defined
under United States federal income tax principles. In general, a sale of a vessel will be
considered to occur outside of the United States for this purpose if title to the vessel, and risk
of loss with respect to the vessel, pass to the buyer outside of the United States. It is expected that any sale of a
vessel by Navios Holdings will be considered to occur outside of the United States.
100
United States Federal Income Taxation of U.S. Holders
As used herein, the term U.S. Holder means a beneficial owner of common stock who
|
|
|
is an individual United States citizen or resident, a United States
corporation or other United States entity taxable as a corporation, an
estate of which the income is subject to United States federal income
taxation regardless of its source, or a trust if a court within the
United States is able to exercise primary jurisdiction over the
administration of the trust and one or more United States persons have
the authority to control all substantial decisions of the trust; |
|
|
|
|
owns Navios Holdings common stock as a capital asset; and |
|
|
|
|
owns less than ten percent (10%) of Navios Holdings common stock for
United States federal income tax purposes. |
If a partnership holds Navios Holdings common stock, the tax treatment of a partner will
generally depend upon the status of the partner and upon the activities of the partnership. If you
are a partner in a partnership holding Navios Holdings common stock, you should consult your tax
advisor.
Tax Treatment of Common Stock
Distributions
Subject to the discussion of passive foreign investment companies (PFICs) below, distributions
made by Navios Holdings with respect to Navios Holdings common stock to a U.S. Holder will
generally constitute dividends to the extent of Navios Holdings current or accumulated earnings
and profits, as determined under United States federal income tax principles, and will be included
in the U.S. Holders gross income. Distributions in excess of such earnings and profits will first
be treated as a non-taxable return of capital to the extent of the U.S. Holders tax basis in his
common stock on a dollar-for-dollar basis and thereafter as capital gain. Because Navios Holdings
is not a United States corporation, U.S. Holders that are corporations will not be entitled to
claim dividends received deduction with respect to any distributions it receives from Navios
Holdings. Dividends paid with respect to Navios Holdings common stock will generally be treated as
passive income for purposes of computing allowable foreign tax credits for United States
foreign tax credit purposes.
Dividends paid on Navios Holdings common stock to a U.S. Holder who is an individual, trust or
estate, a U.S. Non-Corporate Holder, will, under current law, generally be treated as qualified
dividend income that is taxable to such U.S. Non-Corporate Holder a preferential tax rates
(through 2010), provided that (1) the common stock is readily tradable on an established securities
market in the United States (such as the New York Stock Exchange); (2) the dividend income is not
required to be included in gross income under the controlled foreign corporation rules; (3) Navios
Holdings is not a passive foreign investment company for the taxable year during which the dividend is paid or the
immediately preceding taxable year (which Navios Holdings does not believe it is or will be); (4)
the U.S. Non-Corporate Holder has owned the common stock for more than sixty (60) days in the
121-day period beginning sixty (60) days before the date on which the common stock becomes
ex-dividend; and (5) the U.S. Non-Corporate Holder is under no obligation to make related payments
with respect to positions in substantially similar or related property. Special rules may apply to
any extraordinary dividend generally, a dividend in an amount equal to or in excess of ten
percent of a stockholders adjusted basis in a share of common stock paid by Navios Holdings. If
Navios Holdings pays an extraordinary dividend on its common stock that is treated as
qualified dividend income, then any loss derived by a U.S. Non-Corporate Holder from the sale
or exchange of such common stock will be treated as long term capital loss to the extent of such
dividend.
There is no assurance that any dividends paid on Navios Holdings common stock will be eligible
for these preferential rates in the hands of a U.S. Non-Corporate Holder, although Navios Holdings
believes that they will be so eligible. Any dividends out of earnings and profits Navios Holdings
pays, which are not eligible for these preferential rates, will be taxed as ordinary income to a
U.S. Non-Corporate Holder.
101
Sale, Exchange or Other Disposition of Common Stock
Assuming Navios Holdings does not constitute with respect of a U.S. Holder, a passive foreign
investment company for any taxable year, a U.S. Holder generally will recognize taxable gain or
loss upon a sale, exchange or other disposition of Navios Holdings common stock in an amount equal
to the difference between the amount realized by the US Holder from such sale, exchange or other
disposition and the U.S. Holders tax basis in such stock. Such gain or loss will be treated as
long term capital gain or loss if the U.S. Holders holding period is greater than one year at the
time of the sale, exchange or other disposition. Such capital gain or loss will generally be
treated as United States source income or loss, as applicable, for United States foreign tax credit
purposes. Long term capital gains of US Non-Corporate Holders are eligible for reduced rates of
taxation. A U.S. Holders ability to deduct capital losses is subject to certain limitations. See, United States Federal Income Tax Considerations above, for a discussion of certain tax basis and
holding period issues related to Navios Holdings common stock.
Passive Foreign Investment Company Status and Significant Tax Consequences
Special United States federal income tax rules apply to a U.S. Holder that holds stock in a
foreign corporation classified as a passive foreign investment company for United States
federal income tax purposes. A foreign corporation will be a foreign passive investment company if
75% or more of its gross income for a taxable year is treated as passive income, or if the average
percentage of assets held by such corporation during a taxable year which produce or are held to
produce passive income is at least 50%. A U.S. Holder of stock in a passive foreign investment
company can be subject to current taxation on undistributed income of such company or to other
adverse tax results if it does not elect to be subject to such current taxation.
Navios Holdings believes that it will not be a passive foreign investment company because it
believes that its shipping income is not passive income and most of its assets will be held for the
production of non-passive income.
Since there is no legal authority directly on point, however, the IRS or a court could
disagree with Navios Holdings position and treat its shipping income and/or shipping assets as
passive income or as producing or held to produce passive income. In addition, although Navios
Holdings intends to conduct its affairs in a manner that would avoid Navios Holdings being
classified as a passive foreign investment company with respect to any taxable year, it cannot
ensure that the nature of its operations will not change in the future.
United States Federal Income Taxation of Non-U.S. Holders
A beneficial owner of common stock (other than a partnership) that is not a U.S. Holder is
referred to herein as a Non-U.S. Holder.
Dividends on Common Stock
Non-U.S. Holders generally will not be subject to United States federal income tax or
withholding tax on dividends received with respect to Navios Holdings common stock, unless that
income is effectively connected with the Non-U.S. Holders conduct of a trade or business in the
United States. If the Non-U.S. Holder is entitled to the benefits of a United States income tax
treaty with respect to those dividends, that income is taxable only if it is attributable to a
permanent establishment maintained by the Non-U.S. Holder in the United States. In the event that
Navios Holdings were to be taxed as a United States corporation, dividends received by Non-U.S.
Holders could be subject to United States withholding tax. See discussion above under United
States Tax Consequences Taxation of Operating Income: In General.
Sale, Exchange or other Disposition of Common Stock
Non-U.S. Holders generally will not be subject to United States federal income tax or
withholding tax on any gain realized upon the sale, exchange or other disposition of Navios
Holdings common stock, unless:
102
|
|
|
the gain is effectively connected with the Non-U.S. Holders conduct
of a trade or business in the United States (and, if the Non-U.S.
Holder is entitled to the benefits of an income tax treaty with
respect to that gain, that gain is attributable to a permanent
establishment maintained by the Non-US Holder in the United States);
or |
|
|
|
|
the Non-U.S. Holder is an individual who is present in the United
States for 183 days or more during the taxable year of disposition or
is otherwise treated as a United States resident for income tax
purposes and other conditions are met. |
If the Non-U.S. Holder is engaged in a United States trade or business for United States
federal income tax purposes, the income from the common stock, including dividends and the gain
from the sale, exchange or other disposition of the stock, that is effectively connected with the
conduct of that trade or business, will generally be subject to regular United States federal
income tax in the same manner as discussed in the previous section relating to the taxation of U.S.
Holders. In addition, if the shareholder is a corporate Non-U.S. Holder, the shareholders earnings
and profits that are attributable to the effectively connected income, which are subject to certain
adjustments, may be subject to an additional branch profits tax at a rate of thirty percent (30%),
or at a lower rate as may be specified by an applicable income tax treaty.
Backup Withholding and Information Reporting
In general, dividend payments or other taxable distributions, made within the United States to
the shareholder, will be subject to information reporting requirements if the shareholder is a
non-corporate U.S. Holder. Such payments or distributions may also be subject to backup withholding
tax if the shareholder is a non-corporate U.S. Holder and:
|
|
|
fails to provide an accurate taxpayer identification number; |
|
|
|
|
is notified by the IRS that the shareholder failed to report all interest or
dividends required to be shown on the shareholders federal income tax returns; or |
|
|
|
|
in certain circumstances, fails to comply with applicable certification requirements. |
Non-US Holders may be required to establish their exemption from information reporting and
backup withholding by certifying their status on IRS Form W-8ECI or W-8IMY, as applicable.
If the shareholder is a Non-U.S. Holder and sells the Non-U.S. Holders common stock to or
through a United States office of a broker, the payment of the proceeds is subject to both United
States backup withholding and information reporting unless the Non-U.S. Holder certifies that the
Non-U.S. Holder is a non-United States person, under penalties of perjury, or otherwise establishes
an exemption. If the Non-U.S. Holder sells common stock through a non-United States office of a
non-United States broker and the sales proceeds are paid to the Non-U.S. Holder outside the United
States, then information reporting and backup withholding generally will not apply to that payment.
United States information reporting requirements, but not backup withholding, however, will apply
to a payment of sales proceeds, even if that payment is made to the Non-U.S. Holder outside the
United States, if the Non-U.S. Holder sells common stock through a non-United States office of a
broker that is a United States person or has some other contacts with the United States. Such
information reporting requirements will not apply, however, if the broker has documentary evidence
in its records that the shareholder is a non-United States person and certain other conditions are
met, or otherwise establishes an exemption.
The conclusions expressed above are based on current United States tax law. Future
legislative, administrative or judicial changes or interpretations, which can apply retroactively,
could affect the accuracy of those conclusions.
The discussion does not address all of the tax consequences that may be relevant to particular
taxpayers in light of their personal circumstances or to taxpayers subject to special treatment
under the Code. Such taxpayers include non-US persons, insurance companies, tax-exempt entities,
dealers in securities, banks and persons who acquired their shares of capital stock pursuant to the
exercise of employee options or otherwise as compensation.
103
F. Dividends and paying agents
Not applicable.
G. Statement by experts
Not applicable.
H. Documents on display
We file reports and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
These materials, including this annual report and the accompanying exhibits, may be inspected and
copied at the public facilities maintained by the SEC at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C.
20549, or from the SECs website http://www.sec.gov. You may obtain information on the operation of
the public reference room by calling 1-800-SEC-0330 and you may obtain copies at prescribed
rates.
I. Subsidiary information
Not applicable.
Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risks
Navios Holdings is exposed to certain risks related to interest rate, foreign currency and
charter rate risks. To manage these risks, Navios Holdings uses interest rate swaps (for interest
rate risk) and FFAs (for charter rate risk).
Interest Rate Risk:
Debt Instruments On December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, Navios Holdings had a total of
$889.4 million and $615.9 million, respectively, in long term indebtedness. The debt is dollar
denominated and bears interest at a floating rate, except for the senior notes discussed
Liquidity and Capital Resources that bears interest at fixed rate.
For a detailed discussion on Navios Holdings debt instruments refer to section Long Term
Debt Obligations and Credit Arrangements included in Item 5 of this Annual Report.
Interest Rate Swaps Navios Holdings has entered into interest rate swap contracts to hedge
its exposure to variability in its floating rate long term debt. Under the terms of the interest
rate swaps Navios Holdings and the banks agreed to exchange, at specified intervals, the difference
between a paying fixed rate and floating rate interest amount calculated by reference to the agreed
principal amounts and maturities. The interest rate swaps allow Navios Holdings to convert long
term borrowings issued at floating rates into equivalent fixed rates.
At December 31, 2008, Navios Holdings had the following swaps outstanding:
|
a) |
|
One swap with the Royal Bank of Scotland and one swap with Alpha Bank
with a total notional principal amount of $20.4 million. The swaps
were entered into at various points in 2001 and mature in 2010. Navios
Holdings estimates that it would have to pay $1.0 million to terminate
these agreements as of December 31, 2008. As a result of the swaps,
Navios Holdings net exposure is based on total floating rate debt
less the notional principal of floating to fixed interest rate swaps.
A 100 basis points change in interest rates would increase or decrease
interest expense by $0.2 million as of December 31, 2008, so long as
the relevant LIBOR does not exceed the caps described below. The swaps
are set by reference to the difference between the three month LIBOR
(which is the base rate under Navios Holdings long term borrowings)
and the yield on the U.S. ten year treasury bond. The swaps
effectively fix interest rates at 5.55% to 5.65%. However, each of the
foregoing swaps is subject to a cap of 7.5%; to the extent the
relevant LIBOR exceeds the cap, Navios Holdings would remain exposed. |
104
|
b) |
|
In July 2006, and in connection with our senior secured credit
facility with HSH Nordbank AG, Navios Holdings entered into a second
ISDA agreement with HSH Nordbank AG, whereby it exchanges LIBOR with a
fixed rate of 5.52%. This contract applies for the period from
December 31, 2007 to September 30, 2009, for a notional amount of
$79.3 million at redemptions in accordance with the repayment schedule
of our senior secured credit facility. The ISDA agreement is secured
by the same collateral as the secured credit facility. A 100 basis
points change in interest rates would increase or decrease interest
expense by $0.1 million as of December 31, 2008. |
|
|
c) |
|
One swap with Fortis Bank and two swaps with Dexia Bank Belgium with a
total notional amount of $34.0 million. The swaps were entered into at
May 2004 and August 2005 and mature in 2009 and 2010. Navios Holdings
estimates that it would have to pay $0.9 million to terminate these
agreements as of December 31, 2008. The swaps exchange LIBOR with
fixed rates varying from 3.95% to 4.525%. |
At December 31, 2007, Navios Holdings had the following swaps outstanding:
|
a) |
|
One swap with the Royal Bank of Scotland and one swap with Alpha Bank
with a total notional principal amount of $20.4 million. The swaps
were entered into at various points in 2001 and mature in 2010. Navios
Holdings estimates that it would have to pay $0.7 million to terminate
these agreements as of December 31, 2007. As a result of the swaps,
Navios Holdings net exposure is based on total floating rate debt
less the notional principal of floating to fixed interest rate swaps.
A 100 basis points change in interest rates would increase or decrease
interest expense by $0.4 million as of December 31, 2007, so long as
the relevant LIBOR does not exceed the caps described below. The swaps
are set by reference to the difference between the three month LIBOR
(which is the base rate under Navios Holdings long term borrowings)
and the yield on the US ten year treasury bond. The swaps effectively
fix interest rates at 5.55% to 5.65%. However, each of the foregoing
swaps is subject to a cap of 7.5%; to the extent the relevant LIBOR
exceeds the cap, Navios Holdings would remain exposed. |
|
|
b) |
|
On December 21, 2005 and in connection with the senior secured credit
facility, Navios Holdings entered into an International Swap Dealer
Association, Inc., or ISDA Agreement, with HSH Nordbank AG, providing
for interest rate collar with a cap of 5.00% and a floor of 4.45%
(this contract applies for the period from March 2007 to June 2008 on
notional amounts starting at $82.0 million and de-escalated down to
$13.25 million following the loan repayment schedule). |
|
|
c) |
|
In July 2006, and in connection with our senior secured credit
facility with HSH Nordbank AG, Navios Holdings entered into a second
ISDA agreement with HSH Nordbank AG, whereby it exchanges LIBOR with a
fixed rate of 5.52%. This contract applies for the period from
December 31, 2007 to September 30, 2009, for a notional amount of
$79.3 million at redemptions in accordance with the repayment schedule
of our senior secured credit facility. The ISDA agreement is secured
by the same collateral as the secured credit facility. |
|
|
d) |
|
One swap with Fortis Bank and two swaps with Dexia Bank Belgium with a
total notional amount of $34.0 million. The swaps were entered into at
May 2004 and August 2005 and mature in 2009 and 2010. Navios Holdings
estimates that it would have to pay $0.2 million to terminate these
agreements as of December 31, 2007. The swaps exchange LIBOR with
fixed rates varying from 3.95% to 4.525%. |
FFAs Derivative Risk:
Forward Freight Agreements (FFAs) Navios Holdings enters into FFAs as economic hedges
relating to identifiable ship and/or cargo positions and as economic hedges of transactions that Navios Holdings expects to carry out in the normal course of its shipping business. By using FFAs,
Navios Holdings manages the financial risk associated with fluctuating market conditions. The
effectiveness of a hedging relationship is assessed at its inception and then throughout the period
of its designation as a hedge. If an FFA qualifies for hedge accounting, any gain or loss on the
FFA, as accumulated in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income/(Loss), is first recognized when
measuring the profit or loss of related transaction. For FFAs that qualify for hedge accounting,
the changes in fair values of the effective portion representing unrealized gains or losses are
recorded in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income/(Loss) in the stockholders equity while the
unrealized gains or losses of the FFAs not qualifying for hedge accounting together with the
ineffective portion of those qualifying for hedge accounting are recorded in the statement of income under Gain/(Loss)
on Forward Freight Agreements. The gains/(losses) included in Accumulated Other Comprehensive
Income/(Loss) will be reclassified to earnings under Revenue in the statement of income in
the same period or periods during which the hedged forecasted transaction affects earnings. The
reclassification to earnings extended until December 31, 2008, depending on the period or periods
during which the hedged forecasted transaction will affect earnings and commenced in the third
quarter of 2006. For the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006, $19.9 million, $9.8 million
and $4.2 million of losses included in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income/(Loss),
respectively, had been reclassified to earnings.
105
Navios Holdings is exposed to market risk in relation to its FFAs and could suffer substantial
losses from these activities in the event expectations are incorrect. Navios Holdings trades FFAs
with an objective of both economically hedging the risk on the fleet, specific vessels or freight
commitments and taking advantage of short term fluctuations in market prices. As there was no
position deemed to be open as of December 31, 2008, any change in underlying freight market indices
would have no effect on the net income.
Item 12. Description of Securities Other than Equity Securities
Not applicable.
106
PART II
Item 13. Defaults, Dividend Arrearages and Delinquencies
None.
Item 14. Material Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders and Use of Proceeds
None.
Item 15. Controls and Procedures
A. Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Companys management, with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, conducted an evaluation, pursuant to Rule 13a-15 promulgated under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), of the effectiveness of our
disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2008. Based on this evaluation, the Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures
were effective as of December 31, 2008.
Disclosure controls and procedures means controls and other procedures that are designed to
ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under
the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified
in the SECs rules and forms and that such information required to be disclosed by us in the
reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our
management, including our principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons
performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosures.
B. Managements annual report on internal control over financial reporting
The management of Navios Holdings is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate
internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) or 15d-15(f) of the Exchange
Act. Navios Holdings internal control system was designed to provide reasonable assurance to
Navios Holdings management and Board of Directors regarding the preparation and fair presentation
of published financial statements.
All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations.
Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with
respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.
Navios Holdings management assessed the effectiveness of Navios Holdings internal control
over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008. In making this assessment, it used the criteria
set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in
Internal Control Integrated Framework. Based on its assessment, management believes that, as of
December 31, 2008, Navios Holdings internal control over financial reporting is effective based on
those criteria.
We have excluded from the assessment of our internal control over financial reporting, the internal
controls of Horamar, as Horamar was acquired by the Company on January 1, 2008.
107
The total
consolidated assets of Horamar as of December 31, 2008 were $396.2 million, which represented 17.6%
of our total consolidated assets as of December 31, 2008. Revenue and net income of Horamar for the
year ended December 31, 2008, were $97.3 million and $0.1 million, respectively, and represented
7.8% and 0.1%, respectively, of our total revenue and our total net income for the year ended
December 31, 2008. For the year ending December 31, 2009, our evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting will be appropriately expanded to cover the internal controls of Horamar in
accordance with the applicable laws of the United States and SEC regulations.
Navios Holdings independent registered public accounting firm has issued an audit report on
Navios Holdings internal control over financial reporting.
C. Attestation report of the registered public accounting firm
Navios Holdings independent registered public accounting firm has issued an audit report on
Navios Holdings internal control over financial reporting. This report appears on Page F-2 of the
consolidated financial statements.
D. Changes in internal control over financial reporting
There have been no changes in internal controls over financial reporting (identified in
connection with managements evaluation of such internal controls over financial reporting) that
occurred during the year covered by this Annual Report that have materially affected, or are
reasonably likely to materially affect, Navios Holdings internal controls over financial
reporting.
Item 16A. Audit Committee financial expert
Navios Holdings Audit Committee consists of three independent directors, Spyridon Magoulas,
Rex Harrington and Allan Shaw. The Companys Board of Directors has determined that Allan Shaw is
an audit committee financial expert as defined in the instructions of Item 16A of Form 20-F.
Mr. Shaw is a United States Certified Public Accountant and independent as determined in
accordance with SEC rules.
Item 16B. Code of Ethics
Navios Holdings has adopted a code of ethics, the Navios Code of Corporate Conduct and Ethics,
applicable to officers, directors and employees of Navios Holdings that complies with applicable
guidelines issued by the SEC. The Navios Code of Corporate Conduct and Ethics is available for
review on Navios Holdings website at www.navios.com.
Item 16C. Principal Accountant Fees and Services
Our principal accountants for fiscal years 2008 and 2007 were PricewaterhouseCoopers S.A.
The following table presents fees for professional audit services by PricewaterhouseCoopers
S.A. for the audit of our financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007,
respectively, and fees billed for other services rendered during those periods.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended |
|
Year ended |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
December 31, 2007 |
Audit fees |
|
$ |
1,614 |
|
|
$ |
1,619 |
|
Audit-related fees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax fees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All other fees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,614 |
|
|
$ |
1,619 |
|
108
The Audit Committee is responsible for the appointment, replacement, compensation, evaluation
and oversight of the work of the independent auditors. As part of this responsibility, the audit
committee pre-approves the audit and non-audit services performed by the independent auditors in
order to assure that they do not impair the auditors independence from the Company. The Audit
Committee may delegate, to one or more of its designated members, the authority to grant such
pre-approvals. The decisions of any member to whom such authority is delegated is be presented to
the full Committee at each of its scheduled meetings.
All audit services and other services provided by PricewaterhouseCoopers S.A., after the
formation of our Audit Committee in October 2005 were pre-approved by the Audit Committee.
Item 16D. Exemptions from the Listing Standards for Audit Committees
Not applicable.
Item 16E. Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers
In February, 2008, as previously publicly announced, the Board of Directors approved a share
repurchase program for up to $50.0 million of the Navios Holdings common stock. On October 20,
2008, Navios Holdings concluded this share repurchase program. As of October 20, 2008, 6,959,290
shares were repurchased under this program, for a total consideration of $50.0 million.
In November 2008, as previously publicly announced, the Board of Directors approved a share
repurchase program (the November 2008 Program) for up to $25.0 million of the Navios Holdings
common stock. As at December 31, 2008, 575,580 shares were repurchased under the November 2008
Program, for a total consideration of $1.0 million.
These share repurchase programs were adopted under Rule 10b5-1 under the Securities Exchange
Act, as amended. The programs do not require any minimum purchase or any specific number or amount
of shares and may be suspended or reinstated at any time in Navios Holdings discretion and without
notice. Repurchases are subject to restrictions under the terms of our credit facilities and
indenture.
Our
purchases of equity securities for the year ended December 31,
2008 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
shares purchased |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
under the share |
|
|
Total number of |
|
Average price |
|
repurchase |
Period |
|
shares purchased |
|
paid per share |
|
programs |
March 2008 |
|
|
362,900 |
|
|
$ |
9.30 |
|
|
|
362,900 |
|
April 2008 |
|
|
181,300 |
|
|
$ |
9.39 |
|
|
|
544,200 |
|
May 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
544,200 |
|
June 2008 |
|
|
429,340 |
|
|
$ |
9.44 |
|
|
|
973,540 |
|
July 2008 |
|
|
1,404,200 |
|
|
$ |
9.18 |
|
|
|
2,377,740 |
|
August 2008 |
|
|
907,550 |
|
|
$ |
8.92 |
|
|
|
3,285,290 |
|
September 2008 |
|
|
1,500,000 |
|
|
$ |
7.49 |
|
|
|
4,785,290 |
|
October 2008 |
|
|
2,174,000 |
|
|
$ |
3.97 |
|
|
|
6,959,290 |
|
November 2008 |
|
|
441,981 |
|
|
$ |
1.39 |
|
|
|
7,401,271 |
|
December 2008 |
|
|
133,599 |
|
|
$ |
3.14 |
|
|
|
7,534,870 |
|
As of December 31, 2008, the maximum approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be
purchased under the November 2008 Program currently in effect is $24.0 million. As of March 31,
2009, Navios Holdings has repurchased 331,900 additional shares for a total consideration of
approximately $0.7 million.
109
Item 16F. Changes in Registrants Certifying Accountant
Not applicable.
Item 16G. Corporate Governance
Pursuant to an exception for foreign private issuers, we are not required to comply with the
corporate governance practices followed by U.S. companies under the NYSE listing standards.
However, we have voluntarily adopted all of the NYSE required practices.
PART III
Item 17. Financial Statements
See Item 18.
Item 18. Financial Statements
The
financial information required by this Item is set forth on pages F-1
to F-68 and are
filed as part of this annual report.
Item 19. Exhibits
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation. (Incorporated
by reference to the Registration Statement on Form F-1 of
Navios Maritime Holdings Inc. (File No. 333-129382)). |
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
Bylaws. (Incorporated by reference to the Registration
Statement on Form F-1 of Navios Maritime Holdings Inc. (File
No. 333-129382)). |
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
Articles of Amendment of Articles of Incorporation
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 of the Form 6-K
filed on January 17, 2007). |
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
Specimen Unit Certificate (Incorporated by reference to the
Registration Statement on Form F-1 of Navios Maritime
Holdings Inc. (File No. 333-129382)). |
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
Specimen Common Stock Certificate. (Incorporated by reference
to the Registration Statement on Form F-1 of Navios Maritime
Holdings Inc. (File No. 333-129382)). |
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
Specimen Warrant Certificate. (Incorporated by reference to
the Registration Statement on Form F-1 of Navios Maritime
Holdings Inc. (File No. 333-129382)). |
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
Form of Warrant Agreement between Continental Stock Transfer
& Trust Company and International Shipping Enterprises, Inc.,
the legal predecessor of Navios Holdings (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.4 of the Registration Statement on
Form S-1 of International Shipping Enterprises, Inc. (File
No. 333-119719)). |
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
Stockholders Rights Agreement, dated as of October 6, 2008,
between Navios Maritime Holdings Inc. and Continental Stock
Transfer and Trust Company (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 99.1 of the Form 6-K filed on October 6, 2008). |
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
Certificate of Designations of Rights, Preferences and
Privileges of Preferred Shares of Navios Maritime Holdings
Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 of the Form
6-K filed on October 6, 2008). |
|
|
|
4.14
|
|
Facility Agreement among Navios Maritime Holdings Inc., Commerzbank
AG and HSH Nordbank AG, dated February 2007 (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 99.1 of the Form 6-K filed on February 2, 2007). |
110
|
|
|
4.15
|
|
Share Purchase Agreement among various Sellers, NAV
Holdings Limited and Frederic Staelens, as
representative of the Sellers, dated February 2,
2007 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 of
the Form 6-K filed on February 8, 2007). |
|
|
|
4.16
|
|
Form of Supplemental Indenture among Navios Maritime
Holdings Inc., NAV Holdings Limited, other
Guarantors and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 99.1 of the Form 6-K filed
on March 7, 2007). |
|
|
|
4.17
|
|
Second Supplemental Indenture, dated March 8, 2007
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 of the
Form 6-K filed on
April 18, 2007). |
|
|
|
4.18
|
|
Third Supplemental Indenture, dated May 2, 2007
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 of the
Form 6-K filed on
June 15, 2007). |
|
|
|
4.19
|
|
Fourth Supplemental Indenture dated August 9, 2007
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 of the
Form 6-K filed on November 26, 2007). |
|
|
|
4.20
|
|
Fifth Supplemental Indenture dated August 9, 2007
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 of the
Form 6-K filed on November 26, 2007). |
|
|
|
4.21
|
|
Supplemental Agreement in relation to the Facility
Agreement dated February 1, 2007, dated November 15,
2007 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.3 of
the Form 6-K filed on November 26, 2007). |
|
|
|
4.22
|
|
Release of Note Guarantee dated November 16, 2007
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.4 of the
Form 6-K filed on November 26, 2007). |
|
|
|
4.23
|
|
Facility Agreement dated December 11, 2007, with
Navios Maritime Holdings Inc. as a guarantor, for a
loan amount up to $154.0 million (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 99.1 of the Form 6-K filed on
December 18, 2007). |
|
|
|
4.24
|
|
Acquisition Agreement, dated as of December 31,
2007, by and among Navios South American Logistics
Inc., Claudio Pablo Lopez, Carlos Augusto Lopez,
Horacio Enrique Lopez and Horacio Alfredo Lopez,
Navios Corporation and Jandick S.A. (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Form 6-K filed on
January 9, 2008). |
|
|
|
4.25
|
|
Second Supplemental Agreement in relation to the
Facility Agreement dated February 1, 2007, dated
December 24, 2007 (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 of the Form 6-K filed on March 13,
2008). |
|
|
|
4.26
|
|
Sixth Supplemental Indenture dated December 21, 2007
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the
Form 6-K filed on March 13, 2008). |
|
|
|
4.27
|
|
Seventh Supplemental Indenture dated December 21,
2007 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of
the Form 6-K filed on March 13, 2008). |
|
|
|
4.28
|
|
Eighth Supplemental Indenture dated December 21,
2007 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of
the Form 6-K filed on March 13, 2008). |
|
|
|
4.29
|
|
Ninth Supplemental Indenture dated December 21, 2007
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of the
Form 6-K filed on March 13, 2008). |
|
|
|
4.30
|
|
Tenth Supplemental Indenture dated December 21, 2007
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 of the
Form 6-K filed on March 13, 2008). |
|
|
|
4.31
|
|
Eleventh Supplemental Indenture dated December 21,
2007 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 of
the Form 6-K filed on March 13, 2008). |
|
|
|
4.32
|
|
Twelfth Supplemental Indenture dated January 7, 2008
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 of the
Form 6-K filed on March 13, 2008). |
111
|
|
|
4.33
|
|
Thirteenth Supplemental Indenture, dated March 11, 2008 (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 99.1 of the Form 6-K filed on March 26, 2008). |
|
|
|
4.34
|
|
Underwriting Agreement, dated May 23, 2007 by and among Navios Maritime Holdings Inc. and
J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, as the
representatives of the several underwriters listed therein (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 of the Form 6-K filed on May 31, 2007). |
|
|
|
4.35
|
|
2006 Employee, Director and Consultant Stock Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.1 of the Form 6-K filed on
May 16, 2007). |
|
|
|
4.36
|
|
Fourteenth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of June 4, 2008 (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 99.1 of the Form 6-K filed on June 13, 2008). |
|
|
|
4.37
|
|
Fifteenth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of June 4, 2008 (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 99.2 of the Form 6-K filed on June 13, 2008). |
|
|
|
4.38
|
|
Financial Agreement, dated as of March 31, 2008, between Nauticler S.A. and Marfin Egnatia
Bank, Societe Anonyme (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.3 of the Form 6-K filed on
June 13, 2008). |
|
|
|
4.39
|
|
Facility Agreement, dated as of June 24, 2008, with Navios Maritime Holdings Inc. as a
guarantor, for a loan amount up to $133.0 million (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
99.1 to the Form 6-K filed on July 14, 2008). |
|
|
|
4.40
|
|
Sixteenth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of August 4, 2008 (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 99.1 of the Form 6-K filed on September 19, 2008). |
|
|
|
4.41
|
|
Seventeenth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of August 4, 2008 (Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 99.2 of the Form 6-K filed on September 19, 2008). |
|
|
|
4.42
|
|
Eighteenth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of August 28, 2008 (Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 99.3 of the Form 6-K filed on September 19, 2008). |
|
|
|
4.43
|
|
Nineteenth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of September 18, 2008 (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 99.4 of the Form 6-K filed on September 19, 2008). |
|
|
|
4.44
|
|
Twentieth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of September 18, 2008 (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 99.5 of the Form 6-K filed on September 19, 2008). |
|
|
|
4.45
|
|
Twenty First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of November 10, 2008 (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 99.1 of the Form 6-K filed on ecember 10, 2008). |
|
|
|
4.46
|
|
Facility Agreement, dated as of November 10, 2008, with Navios Maritime Holdings Inc. as a
guarantor, for a loan amount up to $90.0 million (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
99.2 of the Form 6-K filed on December 10, 2008). |
|
|
|
8.1
|
|
List of subsidiaries. |
|
|
|
12.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. |
|
|
|
12.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. |
|
|
|
13.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. |
|
|
|
15.1
|
|
Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers S.A. |
112
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
Page |
NAVIOS MARITIME HOLDINGS INC. |
|
|
|
|
F-2 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-3 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-4 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-5 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-6 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-7 |
F-1
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Shareholders and the Board of Directors of
Navios Maritime Holdings Inc.:
In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and the related consolidated
statements of income, stockholders equity and cash flows present fairly, in all material respects,
the financial position of Navios Maritime Holdings Inc and its subsidiaries (the Company) at
December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 and the results of their operations and their cash flows
for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2008, in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the Company
maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2008, based on criteria established in Internal Control Integrated Framework issued
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Companys
management is responsible for these financial statements, for maintaining effective internal
control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control
over financial reporting, included in Managements annual report on internal control over
financial reporting, appearing in Item 15(b) of the Companys 2008 Annual Report on Form 20-F.
Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial statements and on the Companys
internal control over financial reporting based on our audits (which were integrated audits in 2008
and 2007). We conducted our audits of these statements in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free
of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was
maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the financial statements included examining, on
a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements,
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and
evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audits of internal control over
financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial
reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the
design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also
included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We
believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A
companys internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i)
pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the
transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that
transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company;
and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized
acquisition, use, or disposition of the companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or
detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are
subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that
the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
As described in Managements annual report on internal control over financial reporting,
management has excluded Horamar from its assessment as of December 31, 2008 because it was acquired
by the Company in a purchase business combination during 2008. We have also excluded Horamar from
our audit of internal control over financial reporting. The total assets of Horamar (a
consolidated subsidiary of the Company) as of December 31, 2008 were $396.2 million, which
represented 17.6% of consolidated total assets. Revenue and net income of Horamar were $97.3
million and $0.1 million, respectively and represented 7.8% and 0.1%, respectively of consolidated revenue
and consolidated net income for the year ended December 31, 2008.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers S.A.
Athens, Greece
April 14, 2009
F-2
NAVIOS MARITIME HOLDINGS INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
Notes |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
4, 13 |
|
|
$ |
133,624 |
|
|
$ |
427,567 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
2, 13 |
|
|
|
17,858 |
|
|
|
83,697 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
109,780 |
|
|
|
104,968 |
|
Short term derivative asset |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
214,156 |
|
|
|
184,038 |
|
Short term backlog asset |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
2,454 |
|
Due from affiliate companies |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
1,677 |
|
|
|
4,458 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
28,270 |
|
|
|
41,063 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
505,409 |
|
|
|
848,245 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposit for vessels acquisitions |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
404,096 |
|
|
|
208,254 |
|
Vessels, port terminal and other fixed assets, net |
|
|
8, 24 |
|
|
|
737,094 |
|
|
|
425,591 |
|
Long term derivative assets |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
36,697 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
Deferred financing costs, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,449 |
|
|
|
13,017 |
|
Deferred dry dock and special survey costs, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,873 |
|
|
|
3,153 |
|
Investments in leased assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,998 |
|
|
|
58,756 |
|
Investments in affiliates |
|
|
10, 17 |
|
|
|
5,605 |
|
|
|
1,079 |
|
Investments in available for sale securities |
|
|
10, 24 |
|
|
|
22,358 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other long term assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,535 |
|
|
|
|
|
Long term backlog asset |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44 |
|
Customer relationships |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
33,716 |
|
|
|
|
|
Trade name |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
89,953 |
|
|
|
83,393 |
|
Port terminal operating rights |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
31,310 |
|
|
|
29,179 |
|
Favorable lease terms |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
192,899 |
|
|
|
229,393 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
147,632 |
|
|
|
70,810 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,748,215 |
|
|
|
1,122,759 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,253,624 |
|
|
$ |
1,971,004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
72,520 |
|
|
$ |
106,665 |
|
Dividends payable |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
9,096 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
34,468 |
|
|
|
37,926 |
|
Deferred income |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
11,319 |
|
|
|
31,056 |
|
Short term derivative liability |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
128,952 |
|
|
|
256,961 |
|
Deferred tax liability |
|
|
2, 22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,663 |
|
Current portion of long term debt |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
15,177 |
|
|
|
14,220 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
271,532 |
|
|
|
450,491 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior notes, net of discount |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
298,344 |
|
|
|
298,149 |
|
Long term debt, net of current portion |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
574,194 |
|
|
|
301,680 |
|
Unfavorable lease terms |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
76,684 |
|
|
|
96,217 |
|
Long term liabilities and deferred income |
|
|
8, 14 |
|
|
|
47,827 |
|
|
|
638 |
|
Deferred tax liability |
|
|
2, 22 |
|
|
|
26,573 |
|
|
|
53,807 |
|
Long term derivative liability |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
23,691 |
|
|
|
818 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,047,313 |
|
|
|
751,309 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,318,845 |
|
|
|
1,201,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interest |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
128,959 |
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock $0.0001 par value, authorized 1,000,000 shares.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
None issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock $0.0001 par value, authorized 250,000,000 shares,
issued and outstanding 100,488,784 and 106,412,429 as of
December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
494,719 |
|
|
|
536,306 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22,578 |
) |
|
|
(19,939 |
) |
Retained earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
333,669 |
|
|
|
252,826 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
805,820 |
|
|
|
769,204 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,253,624 |
|
|
$ |
1,971,004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-3
NAVIOS MARITIME HOLDINGS INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
Note |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Revenue |
|
|
20 |
|
|
$ |
1,246,062 |
|
|
$ |
758,420 |
|
|
$ |
205,375 |
|
Gain on forward freight agreements |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
16,244 |
|
|
|
26,379 |
|
|
|
19,786 |
|
Time charter, voyage and logistic business expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,066,239 |
) |
|
|
(557,573 |
) |
|
|
(84,225 |
) |
Direct vessel expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26,621 |
) |
|
|
(27,892 |
) |
|
|
(19,863 |
) |
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(40,001 |
) |
|
|
(23,058 |
) |
|
|
(15,057 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
8,9 |
|
|
|
(57,062 |
) |
|
|
(31,900 |
) |
|
|
(37,129 |
) |
Provision for losses on accounts receivable |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
(2,668 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,242 |
) |
Interest income from investments in finance lease |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,185 |
|
|
|
3,507 |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,753 |
|
|
|
10,819 |
|
|
|
3,832 |
|
Interest expense and finance cost, net |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
(49,128 |
) |
|
|
(51,089 |
) |
|
|
(47,429 |
) |
Gain on sale of assets/partial sale of subsidiary |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
27,817 |
|
|
|
167,511 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
948 |
|
|
|
445 |
|
|
|
1,819 |
|
Other expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,584 |
) |
|
|
(2,046 |
) |
|
|
(472 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before equity in net earnings of affiliated
companies and joint venture |
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,706 |
|
|
|
273,523 |
|
|
|
20,395 |
|
Equity in net earnings of affiliated companies and
joint venture |
|
|
10,17 |
|
|
|
17,431 |
|
|
|
1,929 |
|
|
|
674 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before taxes and minority interest |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
64,137 |
|
|
$ |
275,452 |
|
|
$ |
21,069 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
2,22 |
|
|
|
56,113 |
|
|
|
(4,451 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before minority interest |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
120,250 |
|
|
$ |
271,001 |
|
|
$ |
21,069 |
|
Minority interest |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
(1,723 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
118,527 |
|
|
$ |
271,001 |
|
|
$ |
21,069 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incremental fair value of securities offered to
induce warrants exercise |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,195 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income available to common shareholders |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
118,527 |
|
|
$ |
266,806 |
|
|
$ |
21,069 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share, basic |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1.14 |
|
|
$ |
2.87 |
|
|
$ |
0.38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares, basic |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
104,343,083 |
|
|
|
92,820,943 |
|
|
|
54,894,402 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share, diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1.10 |
|
|
$ |
2.68 |
|
|
$ |
0.38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares, diluted |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
107,344,748 |
|
|
|
99,429,533 |
|
|
|
55,529,688 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-4
NAVIOS MARITIME HOLDINGS INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
Note |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
118,527 |
|
|
$ |
271,001 |
|
|
$ |
21,069 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash (used in)/
provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
8,9 |
|
|
|
57,062 |
|
|
|
31,900 |
|
|
|
37,129 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization and write-off of deferred financing cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,077 |
|
|
|
1,856 |
|
|
|
8,004 |
|
Amortization of deferred dry dock costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,933 |
|
|
|
1,687 |
|
|
|
1,382 |
|
Provision for losses on accounts receivable |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
2,668 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,024 |
|
Unrealized (gain)/loss on FFA derivatives |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
8,220 |
|
|
|
(12,232 |
) |
|
|
(12,484 |
) |
Unrealized loss on warrants |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
5,282 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized (gain) on foreign exchange contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(56 |
) |
Unrealized (gain)/loss on interest rate swaps |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
1,874 |
|
|
|
1,279 |
|
|
|
(85 |
) |
Share based compensation |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
2,694 |
|
|
|
566 |
|
|
|
|
|
Gains on sale of assets/partial sale of subsidiary |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
(27,817 |
) |
|
|
(167,511 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Deferred taxes |
|
|
2, 22 |
|
|
|
(56,113 |
) |
|
|
4,451 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings in affiliates and joint ventures, net of dividends
received |
|
|
10,17 |
|
|
|
(4,517 |
) |
|
|
(1,251 |
) |
|
|
(92 |
) |
Minority interest |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
1,723 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Increase) decrease in restricted cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,839 |
|
|
|
(67,473 |
) |
|
|
(12,138 |
) |
(Increase) decrease in accounts receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,473 |
|
|
|
(76,016 |
) |
|
|
(20,556 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Increase) decrease in prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,704 |
|
|
|
(29,811 |
) |
|
|
(371 |
) |
(Increase) decrease in due from affiliates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,781 |
|
|
|
(4,455 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(42,154 |
) |
|
|
59,946 |
|
|
|
23,480 |
|
Increase (decrease) in accrued expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,584 |
) |
|
|
20,088 |
|
|
|
(527 |
) |
Increase (decrease) in deferred voyage revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,737 |
) |
|
|
26,398 |
|
|
|
(1,486 |
) |
Decrease in long term liability |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,627 |
|
|
|
(341 |
) |
|
|
(1,318 |
) |
Increase (decrease) in derivative accounts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(167,297 |
) |
|
|
70,419 |
|
|
|
10,937 |
|
Payments for dry dock and special survey costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,653 |
) |
|
|
(2,426 |
) |
|
|
(2,480 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in)/provided by operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28,388 |
) |
|
|
128,075 |
|
|
|
56,432 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of subsidiary, net of cash acquired |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(107,569 |
) |
|
|
(145,436 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Deposits in escrow in connection with acquisition of subsidiary |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(2,500 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of assets |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
70,088 |
|
|
|
353,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
Receipts from finance lease |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,843 |
|
|
|
9,049 |
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits for vessel acquisitions |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
(197,853 |
) |
|
|
(188,254 |
) |
|
|
(2,055 |
) |
Acquisition of vessels |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
(118,814 |
) |
|
|
(44,510 |
) |
|
|
(108,117 |
) |
Purchase of property and equipment |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
(100,832 |
) |
|
|
(600 |
) |
|
|
(1,291 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(452,637 |
) |
|
|
(16,451 |
) |
|
|
(111,463 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from long term loan |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
314,827 |
|
|
|
141,914 |
|
|
|
117,153 |
|
Proceeds from senior notes, net of discount |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
297,956 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of long term debt and payment of principal |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
(52,563 |
) |
|
|
(135,945 |
) |
|
|
(340,453 |
) |
Debt issuance costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,310 |
) |
|
|
(3,228 |
) |
|
|
(7,775 |
) |
Issuance of common stock |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
6,749 |
|
|
|
239,567 |
|
|
|
65,453 |
|
Dividends paid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28,588 |
) |
|
|
(26,023 |
) |
|
|
(15,382 |
) |
Acquisition of treasury stock |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
(51,033 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
187,082 |
|
|
|
216,285 |
|
|
|
116,952 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(293,943 |
) |
|
|
327,909 |
|
|
|
61,921 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of
year/ period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
427,567 |
|
|
|
99,658 |
|
|
|
37,737 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year/period |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
133,624 |
|
|
$ |
427,567 |
|
|
$ |
99,658 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
48,570 |
|
|
$ |
46,423 |
|
|
$ |
38,917 |
|
Cash paid for income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,553 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Non-cash investing and financing activities
|
|
See Notes 8 and 18 for issuance of shares in connection with the acquisition of vessels |
|
|
|
See Note 2 for dividends declared but not paid. |
|
|
|
See Note 12 for debt assumed in connection with acquisitions of business |
|
|
|
See Note 3 for the shares released to the shareholders of Horamar. |
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-5
NAVIOS MARITIME HOLDINGS INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Common |
|
|
Common |
|
|
Paid-in |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Stockholders |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Income/(Loss) |
|
|
Equity |
|
Balance December 31, 2005 |
|
|
44,239,319 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
205,593 |
|
|
$ |
2,161 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
207,758 |
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,069 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,069 |
|
Other comprehensive income/(loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Change in fair value of financial instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,987 |
) |
|
|
(13,987 |
) |
- Reclassification to earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,171 |
|
|
|
4,171 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,253 |
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock in connection with the
acquisition of vessels (Note 8) |
|
|
1,161,535 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,134 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,134 |
|
Issuance of common stock (Note 18) |
|
|
16,687,273 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
65,451 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,453 |
|
Dividends declared /paid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,382 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,382 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2006 |
|
|
62,088,127 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
276,178 |
|
|
|
7,848 |
|
|
|
(9,816 |
) |
|
|
274,216 |
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
271,001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
271,001 |
|
Other comprehensive income/(loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Change in fair value of financial instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,939 |
) |
|
|
(19,939 |
) |
- Reclassification to earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,816 |
|
|
|
9,816 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
260,878 |
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock in connection with the
construction of two vessels (Note 8) |
|
|
1,397,624 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
Issuance of common stock (Note 18) |
|
|
42,779,414 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
239,562 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
239,567 |
|
Stock based compensation expenses (Note 14) |
|
|
147,264 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
566 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
566 |
|
Dividends declared/paid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26,023 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26,023 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2007 |
|
|
106,412,429 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
536,306 |
|
|
|
252,826 |
|
|
|
(19,939 |
) |
|
|
769,204 |
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
118,527 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
118,527 |
|
Other comprehensive income/(loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Unrealized holding losses on investments in
available for sale securities (Note 24) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22,578 |
) |
|
|
(22,578 |
) |
- Reclassification to earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,939 |
|
|
|
19,939 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
115,888 |
|
Issuance of common stock (Note 18) |
|
|
1,351,368 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,756 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,756 |
|
Acquisition of treasury shares (Note 18) |
|
|
(7,534,870 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(51,032 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(51,033 |
) |
Stock based compensation expenses (Note 14) |
|
|
259,857 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,689 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,689 |
|
Dividends declared/ paid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(37,684 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(37,684 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2008 |
|
|
100,488,784 |
|
|
$ |
10 |
|
|
$ |
494,719 |
|
|
$ |
333,669 |
|
|
$ |
(22,578 |
) |
|
$ |
805,820 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-6
NOTE 1: DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS
On August 25, 2005, pursuant to a Stock Purchase Agreement dated February 28, 2005, as
amended, by and among International Shipping Enterprises, Inc. (ISE), Navios Maritime Holdings
Inc. (Navios Holdings or the Company) and all the shareholders of Navios Holdings, ISE
acquired Navios Holdings through the purchase of all of the outstanding shares of common stock. As
a result of this acquisition, Navios Holdings became a wholly-owned subsidiary of ISE. In addition,
on August 25, 2005, simultaneously with the acquisition of Navios Holdings, ISE effected a
reincorporation from the State of Delaware to the Republic of the Marshall Islands through a
downstream merger with and into its newly acquired wholly-owned subsidiary, whose name was and
continued to be Navios Maritime Holdings Inc.
On January 1, 2008, pursuant to a share purchase agreement, Navios Holdings contributed i)
$112,200 in cash and ii) the authorized capital stock of its wholly-owned subsidiary Corporacion
Navios Sociedad Anonima (CNSA) in exchange for the issuance and delivery of 12,765 shares of
Navios South American Logistics Inc. (Navios Logistics), representing 63.8% (67.2% excluding
contingent consideration) of its outstanding stock. Navios Logistics acquired all ownership
interests in the Horamar Group (Horamar) in exchange for i) $112,200 in cash, of which $5,000
were kept in escrow ($2,500 as of December 31, 2008) payable upon the attainment of certain EBITDA
targets during specified periods through December 2008 (the EBITDA Adjustment) and ii) the
issuance of 7,235 shares of Navios Logistics representing 36.2% (32.8% excluding contingent
consideration) of Navios Logistics outstanding stock, of which 1,007 shares were kept in escrow
(504 shares as of December 31, 2008) pending the EBITDA Adjustment.
Horamar is a privately held Argentina-based group that specializes in the transportation and
storage of liquid cargoes and the transportation of liquid and dry bulk cargoes in South America.
The cash contribution for the acquisition of Horamar was financed entirely by existing cash.
See Note 3
The Company also operates a port and transfer facility located in Nueva Palmira, Uruguay. The
facility consists of docks, conveyors and silo storage capacity totaling 270,440 tons in 2008 (2007
and 2006: 270,440 tons). During 2008, shipments totaled 2,468,200 tons (2006: 2,480,017 tons; 2006:
2,216,800 tons) of agricultural and other products.
On July 1, 2008, the Company completed the initial public offering or an IPO, of units in its
subsidiary, Navios Maritime Acquisition Corporation (Navios Acquisition), a blank check company.
In the offering, Navios Acquisition sold 25,300,000 units for an aggregate purchase price of
$253,000. Simultaneously with the completion of the IPO, the Company purchased private placement
warrants of Navios Acquisition for an aggregate purchase price of $7,600 (Private Placement
Warrants). Prior to the IPO, Navios Holdings had purchased 8,625,000 units (Sponsor Units) for a
total consideration of $25, of which an aggregate of 290,000 units were transferred to the
Companys officers and directors and an aggregate of 2,300,000 Sponsor Units were returned to
Navios Acquisition and cancelled upon receipt. Each unit consists of one share of Navios
Acquisitions common stock and one warrant (Sponsor Warrants, together with the Private
Placement Warrants, the Navios Acquisition Warrants). Currently, the Company owns approximately
6,035,000 (19%) of the outstanding common stock of Navios Acquisition. Navios Acquisition is no
longer a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company but accounted for under the equity method due to
the Companys significant influence over Navios Acquisition.
NOTE 2: SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES:
(a) |
|
Basis of presentation: The accompanying consolidated financial
statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America (US GAAP). Where
necessary, comparative figures have been reclassified to conform to
changes in presentation in the current year. |
F-7
(b) |
|
Principles of consolidation: The accompanying consolidated
financial statements include the accounts of Navios Maritime Holdings
Inc., a Marshall Islands corporation, and its majority owned
subsidiaries (the Company or Navios Holdings). All significant
inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated in the
consolidated statements. |
|
|
|
Subsidiaries: Subsidiaries are those entities in which the Company has an interest of more
than one half of the voting rights or otherwise has power to govern the financial and
operating policies. The purchase method of accounting is used to account for the acquisition
of subsidiaries. The cost of an acquisition is measured as the fair value of the assets given
up, shares issued or liabilities undertaken at the date of acquisition plus costs directly
attributable to the acquisition. The excess of the cost of acquisition over the fair value of
the net tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed is recorded as
goodwill. |
|
|
|
Investments in Affiliates and Joint Ventures: Affiliates are entities over which the
Company generally has between 20% and 50% of the voting rights, or over which the Company has
significant influence, but which it does not exercise control. Joint ventures are entities
over which the Company exercises joint control. Investments in these entities are accounted
for by the equity method of accounting. Under this method the Company records an investment
in the stock of an affiliate or joint venture at cost, and adjusts the carrying amount for
its share of the earnings or losses of the affiliate or joint venture subsequent to the date
of investment and reports the recognized earnings or losses in income. Dividends received
from an affiliate or joint venture; reduce the carrying amount of the investment. When the
Companys share of losses in an affiliate or joint venture equals or exceeds its interest in
the affiliate, the Company does not recognize further losses, unless the Company has incurred
obligations or made payments on behalf of the affiliate or the joint venture. |
Subsidiaries included in the consolidation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nature / |
|
Ownership |
|
Country of |
|
Statement of operations |
Company Name |
|
Vessel Name |
|
Interest |
|
Incorporation |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
Navios Maritime
Holdings Inc.
|
|
Holding Company
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
1/1 12/31 |
Navios Corporation
|
|
Sub-Holding Company
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
1/1 12/31 |
Navios
International Inc.
|
|
Operating Company
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
1/1 12/31 |
Navimax Corporation
|
|
Operating Company
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
1/1 12/31 |
Navios Handybulk
Inc.
|
|
Operating Company
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
1/1 12/31 |
Corporacion Navios
SA
|
|
Operating Company
|
|
100%
|
|
Uruguay
|
|
|
|
1/1 12/31 |
Hestia Shipping Ltd.
|
|
Operating Company
|
|
100%
|
|
Malta
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
1/1 12/31 |
Anemos Maritime
Holdings Inc.
|
|
Sub-Holding Company
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
1/1 12/31 |
Navios
ShipManagement Inc.
|
|
Management Company
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
1/1 12/31 |
NAV Holdings Limited
|
|
Sub-Holding Company
|
|
100%
|
|
Malta
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
2/2 12/31 |
Kleimar N.V.
|
|
Operating company/Vessel
Owning Company
|
|
100%
|
|
Belgium
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
2/2 12/31 |
Kleimar Ltd.
|
|
Operating company
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
9/13 12/31 |
Bulkinvest S.A.
|
|
Operating company
|
|
100%
|
|
Luxembourg
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
2/2 12/31 |
Navios Maritime
Acquisition
Corporation
|
|
Sub-Holding company
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
3/14 6/30
|
|
|
|
|
Primavera Shipping
Corporation
|
|
Operating Company
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
10/15 12/31
|
|
|
Ginger Services Co.
|
|
Operating Company
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
12/22 12/31
|
|
|
F-8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nature / |
|
Ownership |
|
Country of |
|
Statement of operations |
Company Name |
|
Vessel Name |
|
Interest |
|
Incorporation |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
Astra Maritime
Corporation
|
|
Operating Company
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
10/15 12/31
|
|
|
Achilles Shipping
Corporation
|
|
Operating Company
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
1/1 12/31 |
Apollon Shipping
Corporation
|
|
Operating Company
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
1/1 12/31 |
Herakles Shipping Corporation
|
|
Operating Company
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
1/1 12/31 |
Hios Shipping
Corporation
|
|
Operating Company
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
1/1 12/31 |
Ionian Shipping
Corporation
|
|
Operating Company
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
1/1 12/31 |
Kypros Shipping
Corporation
|
|
Operating Company
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
1/1 12/31 |
Meridian Shipping
Enterprises Inc.
|
|
Navios Meridian
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
1/1 12/31 |
Mercator Shipping
Corporation
|
|
Navios Mercator
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
1/1 12/31 |
Libra Shipping
Enterprises
Corporation
|
|
Navios Libra II
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
|
|
1/1 11/15 |
Alegria Shipping
Corporation
|
|
Navios Alegria
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
|
|
1/1 11/15 |
Felicity Shipping
Corporation
|
|
Navios Felicity
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
|
|
1/1 11/15 |
|
|
Gemini Shipping
Corporation
|
|
Navios Gemini S
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
|
|
1/1 11/15 |
Arc Shipping
Corporation
|
|
Navios Arc
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
1/1 12/31 |
Galaxy Shipping
Corporation
|
|
Navios Galaxy I
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
|
|
1/1 11/15 |
Horizon Shipping
Enterprises
Corporation
|
|
Navios Horizon
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
1/1 12/31 |
Magellan Shipping
Corporation
|
|
Navios Magellan
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
1/1 12/31 |
Aegean Shipping
Corporation
|
|
Operating Company
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
1/1 12/31 |
|
|
Star Maritime
Enterprises
Corporation
|
|
Navios Star
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
1/1 12/31 |
Aurora Shipping
Enterprises Ltd.
|
|
Navios Aurora I
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
1/21 6/30
|
|
|
Corsair Shipping Ltd.
|
|
Navios Ulysses
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is
|
|
6/11 12/31
|
|
|
Rowboat Marine Inc.
|
|
Navios Vega
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is
|
|
6/11 12/31
|
|
|
Hyperion Enterprises
Inc.
|
|
Navios Hyperion
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
2/26 12/31 |
Beaufiks Shipping
Corporation
|
|
Vessel Owning
Company
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is
|
|
6/19 12/31
|
|
|
Sagittarius Shipping
Corporation
|
|
Vessel Owning
Company
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
3/6 12/31
|
|
|
Nostos Shipmanagement
Corp. (i)
|
|
Vessel Owning
Company
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
7/4 12/31 |
Portorosa Marine
Corporation (i)
|
|
Navios Happiness
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
7/4 12/31 |
Shikhar Ventures S.A
(i)
|
|
Vessel Owning
Company
|
|
100%
|
|
Liberia
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
12/12 12/31 |
Sizzling Ventures Inc.
|
|
Operating company
|
|
100%
|
|
Liberia
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
12/12 12/31 |
|
|
Rheia Associates Co.
|
|
Operating company
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
12/12 12/31 |
|
|
Taharqa Spirit Corp.
|
|
Operating company
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
12/12 12/31 |
|
|
Rumer Holding Ltd.(i)
|
|
Vessel Owning
Company
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
12/10 12/31 |
Chilali Corp.(i)
|
|
Vessel Owning
Company
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
12/10 12/31 |
Pharos Navigation
S.A.(i)
|
|
Vessel Owning
Company
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
12/11 12/31 |
Pueblo Holdings Ltd.
(i)
|
|
Navios Lumen
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
8/8 12/31
|
|
|
Surf Maritime Co. (i)
|
|
Navios Pollux
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
8/8 12/31
|
|
|
Quena Shipmanagement
Inc.
|
|
Operating Company
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
7/29 12/31
|
|
|
Orbiter Shipping Corp.
|
|
Navios Orbiter
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
9/13 12/31 |
White Narcissus
Marine S.A.
|
|
Navios Asteriks
|
|
100%
|
|
Panama
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
4/19 12/31 |
F-9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nature / |
|
Ownership |
|
Country of |
|
Statement of operations |
Company Name |
|
Vessel Name |
|
Interest |
|
Incorporation |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
Navios G.P. L.L.C.
|
|
Operating Company
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
8/7 12/31 |
Navios South American
Logistics Inc.
|
|
Sub-Holding Company
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
|
|
12/17 12/31 |
Navios Maritime
Partners L.P.
|
|
Sub-Holding Company
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
|
|
8/7 11/15 |
|
|
Prosperity Shipping
Corporation
|
|
Navios Prosperity
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
|
|
10/8 11/15 |
|
|
Aldebaran Shipping
Corporation
|
|
Navios Aldebaran
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
|
|
10/8 11/15 |
|
|
Fantastiks Shipping
Corporation
|
|
Navios Fantastiks
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
|
|
10/23 11/15 |
F-10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nature / |
|
Ownership |
|
Country of |
|
Statement of operations |
Company Name |
|
Vessel Name |
|
Interest |
|
Incorporation |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
Navios South American Logistics
and Subsidiaries: |
|
|
|
|
|
Navios South
American Logistics
Inc.
|
|
Sub-Holding Company
|
|
65.48%
|
|
Marshal Is.
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
|
Corporacion Navios
SA
|
|
Operating Company
|
|
65.48%
|
|
Uruguay
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
|
Nauticler SA
|
|
Sub-Holding Company
|
|
65.48%
|
|
Uruguay
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
|
Compania Naviera
Horamar SA
|
|
Operating Company
|
|
65.48%
|
|
Argentina
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
|
Compania de
Transporte Fluvial
Int SA
|
|
Operating Company
|
|
65.48%
|
|
Uruguay
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
|
Ponte Rio SA
|
|
Operating Company
|
|
65.48%
|
|
Uruguay
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
|
Thalassa Energy SA
|
|
Barges Owning
Company
|
|
40.93%
|
|
Argentina
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
|
HS Tankers Inc. (ii)
|
|
Vessel Owning
Company
|
|
33.39%
|
|
Panama
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
|
HS Navegation Inc.
|
|
Estefania
|
|
33.39%
|
|
Panama
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
|
HS Shipping Ltd Inc.
|
|
Malva H
|
|
40.93%
|
|
Panama
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
|
HS South Inc. (ii)
|
|
Vessel Owning
Company
|
|
40.93%
|
|
Panama
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
|
Mercopar
Internacional S.A.
|
|
Holding Company
|
|
65.48%
|
|
Uruguay
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
|
Nagusa
Internacional S.A.
|
|
Holding Company
|
|
65.48%
|
|
Uruguay
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
|
Hidrovia OSR
Internacional S.A.
|
|
Holding Company
|
|
65.48%
|
|
Uruguay
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
|
Petrovia
Internacional S.A.
|
|
Holding Company
|
|
65.48%
|
|
Uruguay
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
|
Mercopar S.A.
|
|
Shipping Company
|
|
65.48%
|
|
Paraguay
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
|
Navegation Guarani
S.A.
|
|
Shipping Company
|
|
65.48%
|
|
Paraguay
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
|
Hidrovia OSR S.A.
|
|
Oil Spill Response
& Salvage Services
|
|
65.48%
|
|
Paraguay
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
|
Petrovia S.A.
|
|
Shipping Company
|
|
65.48%
|
|
Paraguay
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
|
Mercofluvial S.A.
|
|
Shipping Company
|
|
65.48%
|
|
Paraguay
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
|
Petrolera San
Antonio S.A.
(PETROSAN)
|
|
Oil Storage Plant
and Dock Facilities
|
|
65.48%
|
|
Paraguay
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
|
Flota Mercante
Paraguaya S.A.
|
|
Shipping Company
|
|
65.48%
|
|
Paraguay
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
|
Compania de
Transporte Fluvial
S.A.
|
|
Shipping Company
|
|
65.48%
|
|
Paraguay
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
|
Hidrogas S.A.
|
|
Shipping Company
|
|
65.48%
|
|
Paraguay
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
|
Stability Oceanways
S.A.
|
|
Shipping Company
|
|
65.48%
|
|
Panama
|
|
4/16 12/31
|
|
|
|
|
|
(i) |
|
Each company has the rights over a shipbuilding contract of a Capesize vessel. (Note 8) |
|
(ii) |
|
Each company has the rights over shipbuilding contract of a tanker vessel. |
F-11
Affiliates included in the financial statements accounted for under the equity method:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nature / |
|
Ownership |
Country of |
Statement of operations |
Company Name |
|
Vessel Name |
|
Interest |
|
Incorporation |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
Navios Maritime
Partners L.P.
|
|
Sub-Holding Company
|
|
37.1%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
11/16 12/31 |
Navios Maritime
Operating L.L.C.
|
|
Operating Company
|
|
37.1%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
11/16 12/31 |
Libra Shipping
Enterprises
Corporation
|
|
Navios Libra II
|
|
37.1%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
11/16 12/31 |
Alegria Shipping
Corporation
|
|
Navios Alegria
|
|
37.1%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
11/16 12/31 |
Felicity Shipping
Corporation
|
|
Navios Felicity
|
|
37.1%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
11/16 12/31 |
Gemini Shipping
Corporation
|
|
Navios Gemini S
|
|
37.1%
|
|
Marshal Is.
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
11/16 12/31 |
Galaxy Shipping
Corporation
|
|
Navios Galaxy I
|
|
37.1%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
11/16 12/31 |
Prosperity Shipping
Corporation
|
|
Navios Prosperity
|
|
37.1%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
11/16 12/31 |
Fantastiks Shipping
Corporation
|
|
Navios Fantastiks
|
|
37.1%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
11/16 12/31 |
Aldebaran Shipping
Corporation
|
|
Navios Aldebaran
|
|
37.1%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
11/16 12/31 |
Aurora Shipping
Enterprises Ltd.
|
|
Navios Aurora I
|
|
37.1%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
7/1 12/31
|
|
|
Acropolis
Chartering &
Shipping Inc.
|
|
Brokerage Company
|
|
50%
|
|
Liberia
|
|
1/1 12/31
|
|
1/1 12/31 |
Navios Maritime
Acquisition
Corporation
|
|
Sub-Holding Company
|
|
19%
|
|
Marshall Is.
|
|
7/1 12/31
|
|
|
(c) |
|
Use of estimates: The preparation of consolidated financial
statements in conformity with the accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets
and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as
of the dates of the financial statements and the reported amounts of
revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. On an on-going
basis, management evaluates the estimates and judgments, including
those related to uncompleted voyages, future drydock dates, the
carrying value of investments in affiliates, the selection of useful
lives for tangible assets, expected future cash flows from long-lived
assets to support impairment tests, provisions necessary for accounts
receivables, provisions for legal disputes, pension benefits, and
contingencies. Management bases its estimates and judgments on
historical experience and on various other factors that are believed
to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form
the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and
liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual
results could differ from those estimates under different assumptions
and/or conditions. |
|
(d) |
|
Cash and Cash equivalents: Cash and cash equivalents consist of
cash on hand, deposits held on call with banks, and other short-term
liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less. |
|
(e) |
|
Restricted cash: Restricted cash consists of the restricted portion
of derivative base and margin collaterals with NOS ASA, a Norwegian
clearing house, and cash retention accounts which are restricted for
use as general working capital unless such balances exceed installment
and interest payments due to vessels lenders. A portion of the
amounts on deposit with NOS ASA and LCH are held as base and margin
collaterals on active trades. As of December 31, 2008 and 2007, the
restricted balance with NOS ASA was $1,586 and $36,068, respectively
and with LCH was $9,993 and $41,404 respectively. |
|
|
|
Also included in restricted cash as of December 31, 2008 and 2007 are amounts held as
security in the form of letters of guarantee or letters of credit totaling $1,534 and $668,
respectively. In addition at December 31, 2008 and 2007 restricted cash includes $4,745 and
$5,557 held in retention accounts related to collateral for interest rate swaps and accrued
interest and capital on loans. |
F-12
(f) |
|
Insurance claims: Insurance claims at each balance sheet date
consist of claims submitted wand/or claims in the process of
compilation or submission (claims pending). They are recorded on the
accrual basis and represent the claimable expenses, net of applicable
deductibles, incurred through December 31 of each reported period,
which are expected to be recovered from insurance companies. Any
remaining costs to complete the claims are included in accrued
liabilities. The classification of insurance claims into current and
non-current assets is based on managements expectations as to their
collection dates. |
|
(g) |
|
Inventories: Inventories, which are comprised of lubricants and
stock provisions on board the owned vessels, are valued at the lower
of cost or market as determined on the first in first out basis or
market value. |
|
(h) |
|
Vessel, Port Terminal. Tanker Vessels, Barges, Push boats and Other
Fixed Assets, net: Vessels, port terminal, tanker vessels, barges,
push boats and other fixed assets acquired as parts of business
combination would be recorded at fair market value on the date of
acquisition. Vessels acquired as asset acquisitions would be stated at
historical cost, which consists of the contract price, any material
expenses incurred upon acquisition (improvements and delivery
expenses). Subsequent expenditures for major improvements and
upgrading are capitalized, provided they appreciably extend the life,
increase the earning capacity or improve the efficiency or safety of
the vessels. The cost and related accumulated depreciation of assets
retired or sold are removed from the accounts at the time of sale or
retirement and any gain or loss is included in the accompanying
consolidated statements of operations. |
|
|
|
Expenditures for routine maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred. |
|
|
|
Depreciation is computed using the straight line method over the useful life of the vessels,
after considering the estimated residual value. Management estimates the useful life of the
Companys vessels to be 25 years from the vessels original construction. However, when
regulations place limitations over the ability of a vessel to trade on a worldwide basis, its
useful life is re-estimated to end at the date such regulations become effective. |
|
|
|
Annual depreciation rates used, which approximate the useful life of the assets are: |
|
|
|
Port facilities and transfer station
|
|
3 to 40 years |
Tanker vessels, barges and push boats
|
|
15 to 44 years |
Furniture, fixtures and equipment
|
|
3 to 10 years |
Computer equipment and software
|
|
5 years |
Leasehold improvements
|
|
6 years |
(i) |
|
Fixed assets under construction: This represents amounts expended by
the Company in accordance with the terms of the purchase agreements for
the construction of long-lived fixed assets. Interest costs incurred
during the construction (until the asset is substantially complete and
ready for its intended use) are capitalized. Capitalized interest for the
year ended December 31, 2008 amounted to $4,387 ($54 and $0 for the years
ended December 31, 2007 and 2006). In September 2008, the Company began
construction of a new silo at its port facility in Uruguay which is
expected to be fully operational by the second quarter of 2009. As of December 31, 2008,
the Company paid an amount of $4,770 for the construction of the new
silo. |
F-13
(j) |
|
Assets Held for Sale: It is the Companys policy to dispose of vessels
and other fixed assets when suitable opportunities occur and not
necessarily to keep them until the end of their useful life. The Company
classifies assets and disposal groups as being held for sale in
accordance with SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or the
Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, when the following criteria are met:
management has committed to a plan to sell the asset (disposal group);
the asset (disposal group) is available for immediate sale in its present
condition; an active program to locate a buyer and other actions required
to complete the plan to sell the asset (disposal group) have been
initiated; the sale of the asset (disposal group) is probable, and
transfer of the asset (disposal group) is expected to qualify for
recognition as a completed sale within one year; the asset (disposal
group) is being actively marketed for sale at a price that is reasonable
in relation to its current fair value and actions required to complete
the plan indicate that it is unlikely that significant changes to the
plan will be made or that the plan will be withdrawn. Long-lived assets
or disposal groups classified as held for sale are measured at the lower
of their carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell. These assets
are not depreciated once they meet the criteria to be held for sale. No
assets were classified as held for sale in any of the periods presented. |
|
(k) |
|
Impairment of Long Lived Assets: Vessels, other fixed assets and other
long lived assets held and used by Navios Holdings are reviewed
periodically for potential impairment whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of a particular asset may
not be fully recoverable. In accordance with FAS 144, Navios Holdings
management evaluates the carrying amounts and periods over which
long-lived assets are depreciated to determine if events or changes in
circumstances have occurred that would require modification to their
carrying values or useful lives. In evaluating useful lives and carrying
values of long-lived assets, certain indicators of potential impairment,
are reviewed such as undiscounted projected operating cash flows, vessel
sales and purchases, business plans and overall market conditions.
Undiscounted projected net operating cash flows are determined for each
vessel and compared to the vessel carrying value. In the event that
impairment occurred, the fair value of the related asset is determined
and an impairment charge is recorded to operations calculated by
comparing the assets carrying value to the estimated fair market value.
Fair market value is estimated primarily through the use of third-party
valuations performed on an individual vessel basis. For the purposes of
assessing impairment, long-lived assets are grouped at the lowest levels
for which there are separately identifiable cash flows.
|
|
|
|
During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008, management concluded that
events occurred and circumstances had changes, which may indicate the
existence of potential impairment of Navios Holdings long-lived assets.
These indicators included a significant decline in Navios Holdings stock
price, continued deterioration in the spot market, and the related,
impact the current drybulk sector has on managements expectation for
future revenues. As a result, an interim impairment assessment of
long-lived assets is performed. Unless these indicators improve, it is
likely that an interim impairment analysis will be required to be
performed in future quarters. |
|
|
|
The interim testing was a review of the undiscounted projected net
operating cash flows for each vessel compared to the carrying value. The
significant factors and assumptions used in the undiscounted projected
net operating cash flow analysis included: earnings, dry docking off-hire
costs and operating expenses. Earnings assumptions were based on time
charter rates and forward market rates for future periods where the
vessels are not yet fixed. Operating expenses per day of $4,563 was used
for each owned Panamax and Handymax vessels bearing an annual increase of
3% thereafter. The assessment concluded that step two of the impairment
analysis was not required and no impairment of vessels existed as of
December 31, 2008, as the undiscounted projected net operating cash flows
exceeded the carrying value. |
|
|
|
Although the management believes the underlying assumptions supporting
this assessment are reasonable, if charter rate trends and the length of
the current market downturn, vary significantly from our forecasts, the
management may be required to perform step two of the impairment analysis
in the future that could expose Navios Holdings to material impairment
charges in the future. |
|
|
|
No impairment loss was recognized for any of the periods presented. |
F-14
(l) |
|
Deferred Dry-dock and Special Survey Costs: The Companys vessels,
barges and push boats are subject to regularly scheduled dry-docking and
special surveys which are carried out every 30, 60, and 84 months for
vessels and barges and push boats, respectively to coincide with the
renewal of the related certificates issued by the Classification
Societies, unless a further extension is obtained in rare cases and under
certain conditions. The costs of dry-docking and special surveys is
deferred and amortized over the above periods or to the next dry-docking
or special survey date if such has been determined. Unamortized
dry-docking or special survey costs of vessels, barges and push boats
sold are written off to income in the year the vessel, barge or push boat
is sold. |
|
|
|
This cost is determined by reference to the estimated economic benefits to be derived until
the next dry-docking or special survey. For each of the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007
and 2006, the amortization was $1,933, $1,687, and $1,382, respectively. Accumulated
amortization as of December 31, 2008 and 2007 was $3,028 and $1,003, respectively. |
|
(m) |
|
Asset Retirement Obligation: In accordance with SFAS No. 143,
Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations the Company recorded a
legal obligation associated with the retirement of a tangible long
lived asset in the period in which it is incurred. At December 31,
2008 and 2007, the asset balance was $20 and $22, respectively. At
December 31, 2008 and 2007, the liability balance associated with the
lease of port terminal was $37 and $35, respectively. |
|
(n) |
|
Deferred Financing Costs: Deferred financing costs include fees,
commissions and legal expenses associated with obtaining loan
facilities. These costs are amortized over the life of the related
debt using the effective interest rate method, and are included in
interest expense. Amortization and write offs for each of the years
ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 was $2,077, $1,856 and $8,004,
respectively. |
|
(o) |
|
Goodwill and Other Intangibles: As required by SFAS No. 142
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, goodwill acquired in a
business combination initiated after June 30, 2001 is not to be
amortized. Similarly, intangible assets with indefinite lives are not
amortized. Rather, SFAS 142 requires that goodwill be tested for
impairment at least annually and written down with a charge to
operations if the carrying amount exceeds the estimated fair value. |
|
|
|
The Company evaluates impairment of goodwill using a two-step process. First, the aggregate
fair value of the reporting unit is compared to its carrying amount, including goodwill. The
Company determines the fair value based on a combination of discounted cash flow analysis and
an industry market multiple. |
|
|
|
If the fair value exceeds the carrying amount, no impairment exists. If the carrying amount
of the reporting unit exceeds the fair value, then the Company must perform the second step
in order to determine the implied fair value of the reporting units goodwill and compare it
with its carrying amount. The implied fair value is determined by allocating the fair value
of the reporting unit to all the assets and liabilities of that unit, as if the unit had been
acquired in a business combination and the fair value of the unit was the purchase price. If
the carrying amount of the goodwill exceeds the implied fair value, then goodwill impairment
is recognized by writing the goodwill down to the implied fair value. |
|
|
|
During the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2008, management concluded that events occurred and
circumstances had changed, which may indicate the existence of potential impairment of Navios
Holdings goodwill. These indicators included a significant decline in Navios Holdings stock
price, continued deterioration in the spot market, and the related impact the current drybulk
sector has on managements expectation for future revenues. As a result, an interim
impairment assessment of goodwill was performed. Unless these indicators improve, it is
likely that an interim impairment analysis will be required to be performed in future
quarters. |
|
|
|
The interim testing was a review of the fair market value of the Company as compared to the
carrying value of its assets using a discounted cash flow model. The significant factors and
assumptions the Company used in its discounted cash flow analysis included: EBITDA, the
discount rate used to calculate the present value of future cash flows and future capital
expenditures. EBITDA assumptions included forward charter rates, general and administrative
expense growth assumptions, and direct vessel expenses growth
assumptions. The Companys assessment concluded that step 2 was not required and no impairment of goodwill existed in any of the periods presented as the fair value exceeded carrying value. Although the Company
believes its underlying assumptions supporting this assessment are reasonable, if the
Companys actual revenue, direct vessel expenses, and general and administrative expenses,
vary significantly from its forecasts, the Company may be required to perform a step two
analysis in the future that could expose the Company to material impairment charges in the
future. |
F-15
|
|
|
The Company also considered as an indicator of fair market value its total market
capitalization based on the trading price of its common stock as of December 31, 2008.
However, given the extreme volatility in the stock market during the quarter ended December
31, 2008, as well as the impact that the credit crisis and the recession had on the stock
market during that period, management concluded that it was appropriate to place more
reliance on fair market value as calculated by the Companys discounted cash flow model in
evaluating goodwill impairment, rather than the total market capitalization. |
|
|
|
No impairment loss was recognized for any of the periods presented. |
|
|
|
The fair value of the trade name was determined based on the relief from royalty method
which values the trade name based on the estimated amount that a company would have to pay in
an arms length transaction in order to use that trade name. The asset is being amortized
under the straight line method over 32 years. The fair value of customer relationships was
determined based on the excess earnings method, which relies upon the future cash flow
generating ability of the asset. The asset is amortized under the straight line method over
20 years. Other intangibles that are being amortized, such as the amortizable portion of
favorable leases, port terminal operating rights, backlog assets and liabilities, would be
considered impaired if their fair market value could not be recovered from the future
undiscounted cash flows associated with the asset. Vessel purchase options, which are
included in favorable lease terms, are not amortized and would be considered impaired if the
carrying value of an option, when added to the option price of the vessel, exceeded the fair
market value of the vessel. |
|
|
|
The weighted average amortization periods for intangibles are: |
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets/liabilities |
|
Years |
Trade name |
|
|
21.0 |
|
Favorable lease terms (*) |
|
|
6.6 |
|
Unfavorable lease terms (**) |
|
|
4.7 |
|
Port terminal operating rights |
|
|
30.0 |
|
Customer relationships |
|
|
20.0 |
|
Backlog asset port terminal |
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
|
(*) |
|
The intangible asset associated with the
favorable lease terms includes an amount of
$57,187 related to purchase options for the
vessels. This amount is not amortized and
should the purchase options be exercised,
any unamortized portion of this asset will
be capitalized as part of the cost of the
vessel and will be depreciated over the
remaining useful life of the vessel (Note
9). As of December 31, 2008 and 2007,
$16,545 and $8,585 respectively, had been
transferred to the acquisition cost of
vessels. |
|
(**) |
|
The intangible liability
associated with the unfavorable
lease terms includes an amount
of $15,890 related to purchase
options held by third parties.
This amount is not amortized and
if exercised by the third party
the liability will be included
in the calculation of the gain
or loss of the related vessel.
As of December 31, 2008 and
2007, no purchase options held
by third parties have been
exercised. |
F-16
(p) |
|
Foreign Currency Translation: The Companys
functional and reporting currency is the US Dollar. The
Company engages in worldwide commerce with a variety of
entities. Although, its operations may expose it to
certain levels of foreign currency risk, its
transactions are predominantly US dollar denominated.
Additionally, the Companys subsidiaries in Uruguay,
Argentina and Paraguay transact a nominal amount of
their operations in Uruguayan pesos, Argentinean pesos
and Guaranies whereas the Companys wholly-owned vessel
subsidiaries and the vessel management subsidiary
transact a nominal amount of their operations in Euros;
however, all of the subsidiaries primary cash flows are
US dollar denominated. Transactions in currencies other
than the functional currency are translated at the
exchange rate in effect at the date of each transaction.
Differences in exchange rates during the period between
the date a transaction denominated in a foreign currency
is consummated and the date on which it is either
settled or translated, are recognized in the statement
of income. The foreign currency exchange gains/(losses)
recognized in the consolidated statement of income for
each of the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and
2006, were $(11), $(104) and $219, respectively. |
|
(q) |
|
Provisions: The Company, in the ordinary course of
business, is subject to various claims, suits and
complaints. Management, in consultation with internal
and external advisers, will provide for a contingent
loss in the financial statements if the contingency had
been incurred at the date of the financial statements
and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated.
In accordance with SFAS No. 5, Accounting for
Contingencies, as interpreted by the FASB
Interpretation No. 14, Reasonable Estimation of the
Amount of a Loss, if the Company has determined that
the reasonable estimate of the loss is a range and there
is no best estimate within the range, the Company will
provide the lower amount of the range. See Note 15,
Commitments and Contingencies for further
discussion. |
|
|
|
The Company participates in Protection and Indemnity (P&I) insurance plans provided by mutual
insurance associations known as P&I clubs. Under the terms of these plans, participants may
be required to pay additional premiums (supplementary calls) to fund operating deficits
incurred by the clubs (back calls). Obligations for back calls are accrued annually based
on information provided by the clubs. |
|
|
|
Provisions for estimated losses on uncompleted voyages and vessels time chartered to others
are provided for in the period in which such losses are determined. At December 31, 2008, the
balance for provision for loss making voyages in progress was $2,339 (2007: $12,395). |
|
(r) |
|
Segment Reporting: The Company accounts for its segments in
accordance with SFAS No. 131, Disclosure about Segments of an
Enterprise and Related Information. SFAS No. 131 requires
descriptive information about its reportable operating segments.
Operating segments, as defined, are components of an enterprise about
which separate financial information is available that is evaluated
regularly by the chief operating decision maker in deciding how to
allocate resources and in assessing performance. Following the
acquisition of Horamar and the formation of Navios Logistics, the
Company has renamed its Port Terminal Segment to Logistics Segment, to
include the activities of Horamar which provides similar products and
services in the region that Navios existing port facility currently
operates. Based on the Companys methods of internal reporting and
management structure, the Company has two reportable segments: Vessel
Operations and Logistic Business. |
|
(s) |
|
Revenue and Expense Recognition: |
|
|
|
Revenue Recognition: Revenue is recorded when services are rendered, the Company has a
signed charter agreement or other evidence of an arrangement, the price is fixed or
determinable, and collection is reasonably assured. The Company generates revenue from the
following sources, (1) transportation of cargo, (2) time charter of vessels and, (3) port
terminal operations. |
|
|
|
Voyage revenues for the transportation of cargo are recognized ratably over the estimated
relative transit time of each voyage. A voyage is deemed to commence when a vessel is
available for loading and is deemed to end upon the completion of the discharge of the
current cargo. Estimated losses on voyages are provided for in full at the time such losses
become evident. Under a voyage charter, we agree to provide a vessel for the transportation
of specific goods between specific ports in return for payment of an agreed upon freight rate
per ton of cargo. |
F-17
|
|
Revenues from time chartering of vessels are accounted for as operating leases and are thus
recognized on a straight line basis as the average revenue over the rental periods of such
charter agreements, as service is performed, except for loss generating time charters, in
which case the loss is recognized in the period when such loss is determined. A time charter
involves placing a vessel at the charterers disposal for a period of time during which the
charterer uses the vessel in return for the payment of a specified daily hire rate. Short
period charters for less than three months are referred to as spot-charters. Charters
extending three months to a year are generally referred to as medium term charters. All other
charters are considered long term. Under time charters, operating cost such as for crews,
maintenance and insurance are typically paid by the owner of the vessel. |
|
|
|
Revenues from port terminal operations consist of an agreed flat fee per ton and cover the
services performed to unload barges (or trucks), transfer the product into the silos for
temporary storage and then loading the ocean-going vessels. Revenues are recognized upon
completion of loading the ocean-going vessels. Additionally, fees are charged for vessel
dockage and for storage time in excess of contractually specified terms. Dockage revenues are
recognized ratably up to completion of loading. Storage fees are assessed and recognized when
the product remains in the silo storage beyond the contractually agreed time allowed. Storage
fee revenue is recognized ratably over the storage period and ends when the product is loaded
onto the ocean-going vessel. |
|
|
|
Forward Freight Agreements (FFAs): Realized gains or losses from FFAs are recognized
monthly concurrent with cash settlements. In addition, quarterly the FFAs are marked to
market to determine the fair values which generate unrealized gains or losses. Trading of
FFAs could lead to material fluctuations in the Companys reported results from operations on
a period to period basis. See Note 13. |
|
|
|
Deferred Voyage Revenue: Deferred voyage revenue primarily relates to cash received from
charterers prior to it being earned. These amounts are recognized as revenue over the voyage
or charter period. |
|
|
|
Time Charter, Voyage and Port Terminal Expense: Time charter and voyage expenses comprise
all expenses related to each particular voyage, including time charter hire paid and voyage
freight paid, bunkers, port charges, canal tolls, cargo handling, agency fees and brokerage
commissions. Also included in time charter and voyage expenses are charterers liability
insurances, provision for losses on time charters and voyages in progress at year-end, direct
port terminal expenses and other miscellaneous expenses. |
|
|
|
Direct Vessel Expense: Direct vessel expenses consist of all expenses relating to the
operation of vessels, including crewing, repairs and maintenance, insurance, stores and
lubricants and miscellaneous expenses such as communications and amortization of dry-docking
and special survey costs. |
|
|
|
Prepaid Voyage Costs: Prepaid voyage costs relate to cash paid in advance for expenses
associated with voyages. These amounts are recognized as expense over the voyage or charter
period. |
|
(t) |
|
Employee benefits: |
|
|
|
Pension and retirement obligations-crew: The Companys ship-owning subsidiary companies
employ the crew on board under short-term contracts (usually up to nine months) and,
accordingly, they are not liable for any pension or post-retirement benefits. |
|
|
|
Provision for employees severance and retirement compensation: The employees in the
Companys office in Greece are protected by Greek labor law. Accordingly, compensation is
payable to such employees upon dismissal or retirement. The amount of compensation is based
on the number of years of service and the amount of remuneration at the date of dismissal or
retirement. If the employees remain in the employment of the Company until normal retirement
age, they are entitled to retirement compensation which is equal to 40% of the compensation
amount that would be payable if they were dismissed at that time. The number of employees
that will remain with the Company until retirement age is not known. The Company is required to
annually value the statutory terminations indemnities liability. Management obtains a
valuation from independent actuaries to assist in the calculation of the benefits. The
Company provides, in full, for the employees termination indemnities liability. This
liability amounted to $305 and $141 at December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. |
F-18
|
|
|
U.S. Retirement savings plan: The Company sponsors a 401(k) retirement savings plan, which
is categorized as a defined contribution plan. The plan is available to full time employees
who meet the plans eligibility requirements. The plan permits employees to make
contributions up to 15% of their annual salary with the Company matching up to the first 6%.
The Company makes monthly contributions (matching contributions) to the plan based on amounts
contributed by employees. Subsequent to making the matching contributions, the Company has no
further obligations. The Company may make an additional discretionary contribution annually
if such a contribution is authorized by the Board of Directors. The plan is administered by
an independent professional firm that specializes in providing such services. See Note 14. |
|
|
|
Other post-retirement obligations: The Company has a legacy pension arrangement for
certain Bahamian, Uruguayan and former Navios Corporation employees. The entitlement to these
benefits is only to these former employees. The expected costs of these benefits are accrued
each year, using an accounting methodology similar to that for defined benefit pension plans.
These obligations are valued annually by independent actuaries. |
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation: On October 18, 2007 and December 16, 2008, the Compensation
Committee of the Board of Directors authorized the issuance of restricted stock and stock
options in accordance with the Companys stock option plan for its employees, officers and
directors. The Company awarded restricted stock to its employees, officers and directors and
stock options to its executives and directors, based on service conditions only, which vest
over two years and three years, respectively. |
|
|
|
The fair value of stock option grants is determined with reference to option pricing models,
principally adjusted Black-Scholes models. The fair value of restricted stock grants is
determined by reference to the quoted stock price on the date of grant. Compensation expense,
net of estimated forfeitures, is recognized based on a graded expense model over the vesting
period. |
|
(u) |
|
Financial Instruments: Financial instruments carried on the balance
sheet include cash and cash equivalents, trade receivables and
payables, other receivables and other liabilities, long-term debt and
capital leases. The particular recognition methods applicable to each
class of financial instrument are disclosed in the applicable
significant policy description of each item, or included below as
applicable. |
|
|
|
Financial risk management: The Companys activities expose it to a variety of financial
risks including fluctuations in future freight rates, time charter hire rates, and fuel
prices, credit and interest rates risk. Risk management is carried out under policies
approved by executive management. Guidelines are established for overall risk management, as
well as specific areas of operations. |
|
|
|
Credit risk: The Company closely monitors its exposure to customers and counter-parties
for credit risk. The Company has policies in place to ensure that it trades with customers
and counterparties with an appropriate credit history. Derivative counter-parties and cash
transactions are limited to high quality credit financial institutions. |
|
|
|
Interest rate risk: The Company is party to interest rate swap agreements. The purpose of
the agreements is to reduce exposure to fluctuations in interest rates. Any differential to
be paid or received on an interest rate swap agreement is recognized as a component of other
income or expense over the period of the agreement. Gains and losses on early termination of
interest rate swaps are taken to the consolidated statement of operations. The effective
portion of changes in the fair value of interest rate swap agreements that are designated and
qualify as cash flow hedges are recognized in equity. The gain or loss relating to the
ineffective portion is recognized in the statement of operations. |
F-19
|
|
Liquidity risk: Prudent liquidity risk management implies maintaining sufficient cash and
marketable securities, the availability of funding through an adequate amount of committed
credit facilities and the ability to close out market positions. The Company monitors cash
balances adequately to meet working capital needs. |
|
|
|
Foreign exchange risk: Foreign currency transactions are translated into the measurement
currency rates prevailing at the dates of transactions. Foreign exchange gains and losses
resulting from the settlement of such transactions and from the translation of monetary
assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are recognized in the statement of
operations. |
|
|
|
Accounting for derivative financial instruments and hedging activities: |
|
|
|
The Company enters into dry bulk shipping FFAs as economic hedges relating to identifiable
ship and or cargo positions and as economic hedges of transactions the Company expects to
carry out in the normal course of its shipping business. By utilizing certain derivative
instruments, including dry bulk shipping FFAs, the Company manages the financial risk
associated with fluctuating market conditions. In entering into these contracts, the Company
has assumed the risk that might arise from the possible inability of counterparties to meet
the terms of their contracts. |
|
|
|
The Company also trades dry bulk shipping FFAs which are cleared through NOS ASA, a Norwegian
clearing house and LCH the London clearing house. NOS ASA and LCH call for both base and
margin collaterals, which are funded by Navios Holdings, and which in turn substantially
eliminate counterparty risk. Certain portions of these collateral funds may be restricted at
any given time as determined by NOS ASA and LCH. |
|
|
|
At the end of each calendar quarter, the fair value of dry bulk shipping FFAs traded
over-the-counter are determined from an index published in London, United Kingdom and the
fair value of those FFAs traded with NOS ASA and LCH are determined from the NOS and LCH
valuations accordingly. |
|
|
|
Pursuant to SFAS 133, the Company records all of its derivative financial instruments and
hedges as economic hedges except for those qualifying for hedge accounting. Gains or losses
of instruments qualifying for hedge accounting as cash flow hedges are reflected under
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income/(Loss) in stockholders equity, while those
instruments that do not meet the criteria for hedge accounting are reflected in the statement
of operations. For FFAs that qualify for hedge accounting the changes in fair values of the
effective portion representing unrealized gain or losses are recorded under Accumulated
Other Comprehensive Income/(Loss) in the stockholders equity while the unrealized gains or
losses of the FFAs not qualifying for hedge accounting together with the ineffective portion
of those qualifying for hedge accounting, are recorded in the statement of operations under
Gain/(Loss) on Forward Freight Agreements. The gains/(losses) included in Accumulated
Other Comprehensive Income/(Loss) are being reclassified to earnings under Revenue in the
statement of operations in the same period or periods during which the hedged forecasted
transaction affects earnings. The reclassification to earnings commenced in the third quarter
of 2006 and extended until December 31, 2008, depending on the period or periods during which
the hedged forecasted transactions affected earnings. All of the amount included in
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income/(Loss) had been reclassified to earnings as of
December 31, 2008. For the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, $19,939 and $9,816
and $4,171 losses, respectively, included in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income/
(Loss), were reclassified to earnings. |
|
|
|
The Company classifies cash flows related to derivative financial instruments within cash
provided by operating activities in the consolidated statement of cash flows. |
F-20
(v) |
|
Earnings per Share: Basic earnings per share are computed by
dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares
outstanding during the periods presented. Diluted earnings per share
reflect the potential dilution that would occur if securities or other
contracts to issue common stock were exercised. Dilution has been
computed by the treasury stock method whereby all of the Companys
dilutive securities (the warrants and stock options) are assumed to be
exercised and the proceeds used to repurchase common shares at the
weighted average market price of the Companys common stock during the
relevant periods. The incremental shares (the difference between the
number of shares assumed issued and the number of shares assumed
purchased) shall be included in the denominator of the diluted
earnings per share computation. Restricted stock (vested and unvested)
is included in the calculation of the diluted earnings per shares,
based on the weighted average number of restricted stock assumed to be
outstanding during the period. |
|
(w) |
|
Income Taxes: The Company is a Marshall Islands Corporation.
Pursuant to various treaties and the United States Internal Revenue
Code, the Company believes that substantially all its operations are
exempt from income taxes in the Marshall Islands and United States of
America. The tax expense reflected in the Companys consolidated
financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2007 is
attributable to its subsidiary in Belgium, which was subject to the
Belgium income tax regime. (Note 22).In June 2008, Navios Holdings
Belgian subsidiary received a ruling from the Belgian tax authorities,
confirming that provided it meets certain quantitative criteria, it
would be eligible to be taxed under the tonnage tax system (rather
than the corporate taxation up to 2007). The effect of the ruling was
that the deferred taxes recognized in the balance sheet relating to
Kleimar (amounting to $57,249) were reversed through the income
statement in the second quarter of 2008.
|
|
|
|
The tax expense reflected in the Companys consolidated financial
statements for the year ended December 31, 2008 is attributable to its
subsidiaries in South America, which are subject to the Argentinean
and Paraguayan income tax regime. |
|
|
|
The asset and liability method is used to account for future income taxes. Under this method,
future income tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the estimated future tax
consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and
the tax bases of assets and liabilities. Future income tax assets and liabilities are
measured using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which those temporary differences
are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on future income tax assets and
liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the
enactment date. A deferred tax asset is recognized for temporary differences that will result
in deductible amounts in future years. Valuation allowance is recognized if, based on the
weight of available evidence, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the
deferred tax asset will not be realized. |
|
|
|
The Company recognizes investment tax credits (ITC), which are generated by its Belgian
subsidiary, using the flow-through method pursuant to APB 4, Accounting for the
Investment Credit. Where these credits are generated as a result of intercompany
transfers of assets, the Company does not recognize an asset when these credits are generated
(in accordance with par.9(e) of FAS 109, Accounting for Income Taxes). To the extent that
the ITC generated as a result of an intercompany transaction reduces taxes payable in the
buyers tax jurisdiction, the Company recognizes the benefit as deferred income, which is
amortized to income over the remaining useful life of the transferred asset. As of December
31, 2008, the Company had $0 (2007: $78,045) of ITC available to offset future taxable income
(corresponding to approximately $0 and $26,535, respectively, available to offset future
taxes payable). |
|
|
|
For intercompany transfers of assets, the Company does not recognize deferred tax assets for
the difference between the tax basis of the assets in the buyers tax jurisdiction and their
cost as reported in the consolidated financial statements. To the extent that the
intercompany transfer generates taxes payable in the sellers tax jurisdiction, cash taxes
paid are recognized as a deferred charge and amortized to expense over the remaining useful
life of the transferred asset. As of December 31, 2008 and 2007, the Company had $0 and
$53,241, respectively, unrecognized deferred tax assets attributable to the difference
between the tax basis of the assets in the buyers tax jurisdiction and their cost as
reported in the consolidated financial statements. |
F-21
(x) |
|
Dividends: Dividends are recorded in the Companys financial
statements in the period in which they are declared. At December 31,
2008, the dividend declared relating to the third quarter of 2008 of
approximately $9.1 million was payable on January 6, 2009, and thus
it is recorded on the consolidated balance sheet as a current
liability. |
|
(y) |
|
Guarantees: The Company accounts for guarantees in accordance with
FASB Interpretation No. 45 (FIN 45), Guarantors Accounting and
Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees
of Indebtedness of Others. Under FIN 45 a liability for the fair
value of the obligation undertaken in issuing the guarantee is
recognized. However, this is limited to those guarantees issued or
modified after December 31, 2002. The recognition of fair value is
not required for certain guarantees such as the parents guarantee of
a subsidiarys debt to a third party or guarantees on product
warranties. For those guarantees excluded from FIN 45s fair value
recognition provision, financial statement disclosures of their terms
are made. |
|
(z) |
|
Leases: Vessel leases where Navios Holdings is regarded as the
lessor are classified as either finance leases or operating leases
based on an assessment of the terms of the lease. For charters
classified as finance type leases the minimum lease payments are
recorded as the gross investment in the lease. The difference between
the gross investment in the lease and the sum of the present values
of the two components of the gross investment is recorded as unearned
income which is amortized to income over the lease term as finance
lease interest income to produce a constant periodic rate of return
on the net investment in the lease. |
|
(aa) |
|
Accounting for the acquisition of Horamar: The Company accounted for
the acquisition of Horamar Group (as described in Note 3) as a
partial sale of CNSA to the minority shareholders of Navios
Logistics, and a partial acquisition of Horamar. Accordingly, a gain
was recognized by Navios for the portion of CNSA sold amounting to
$2,702. Horamars assets and liabilities were revalued to 100% of
their respective fair values, CNSAs assets and liabilities were
recorded at carryover basis, reflecting the common control nature of
the transaction. The contingent shares consideration will be
accounted for when the contingency is resolved. |
|
(ab) |
|
Treasury Stock: Treasury stock is accounted for using the cost
method. Excess of the purchase price of the treasury stock acquired,
plus direct acquisition costs over its par value is recorded in
additional paid-in capital. |
|
(ac) |
|
Trade Accounts receivable: The amount shown as accounts receivable,
trade, at each balance sheet date, includes receivables from
charterers for hire, freight and demurrage billings and FFA
counterparties, net of a provision for doubtful accounts. At each
balance sheet date, all potentially uncollectible accounts are
assessed individually for purposes of determining the appropriate
provision for doubtful accounts. |
|
(ad) |
|
Investment in available for sale securities: The Company classifies
its existing marketable equity securities as available-for-sale in
accordance with provisions of SFAS 115 Accounting for Certain
Investments in Debt and Equity Securities. These securities are
carried at fair market value, with unrealized gains and losses
excluded from earnings and reported directly in stockholders equity
as a component of other comprehensive income (loss) unless an
unrealized loss is considered other-than-temporary, in which case
it is transferred to the statement of income. Management evaluates
securities for other than temporary impairment (OTTI) on a
quarterly basis. Consideration is given to (1) the length of time and
the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, (2) the
financial condition and near-term prospects of the investee, and (3)
the intent and ability of the Company to retain its investment in the
investee for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated
recovery in fair value..
As of December 31, 2008, the Companys unrealized holding losses in
available for sale securities were $22,578. Based on the Companys
OTTI analysis, management considers the decline in market valuation
of these securities to be temporary. However, there is the potential
for future impairment charges relative to these equity securities if
their fair values do not recover and our OTTI analysis indicates such
write downs are necessary. See Note 24. |
F-22
(ae) |
|
Financial Instruments and Fair Value: The Company adopted SFAS No.
157, Fair Value Measurements as of January 1, 2008. SFAS No. 157
establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to
valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives
the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets
for identical assets or liabilities (level 1 measurements) and the
lowest priority to unobservable inputs (level 3 measurements). The
three levels of the fair value hierarchy under SFAS No. 157 are
described below:
|
Basis of Fair Value Measurement
Level 1 : Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are
accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets
or liabilities;
Level 2 : Quoted prices in markets that are not active or financial
instruments for which all significant inputs are observable, either
directly or indirectly;
Level 3 : Prices or valuations that require inputs that are both
significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable.
A financial instruments level within the fair value hierarchy is
based on the lowest level of any input that is significant to the
fair value measurement. In determining the appropriate levels, the
Company performs a detailed analysis of the assets and liabilities
that are subject to SFAS 157.
|
(af) |
|
Recent Accounting Pronouncements: |
|
|
|
In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157 (SFAS
157) Fair Value Measurement. SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for
measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and expands
disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS 157 is effective for financial statements
issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those
fiscal years. Earlier application is encouraged, provided that the reporting entity has not
yet issued financial statements for that fiscal year, including financial statements for an
interim period within that fiscal year. The provisions of SFAS 157 should be applied
prospectively as of the beginning of the fiscal year in which it is initially applied except
for certain cases where it should be applied retrospectively. This statement was effective for
the Company for the fiscal year beginning on January 1, 2008 and it did not have a material
affect on its consolidated financial statements. |
|
|
|
In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 159 (SFAS
159) The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities. SFAS 159
permits the entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items
at fair value that are not currently required to be measured at fair value. This Statement is
expected to expand the use of fair value measurement, which is consistent with the Boards
long-term measurement objectives for accounting for financial instruments. SFAS 159 is
effective as of the beginning of an entitys first fiscal year that begins after November 15,
2007. Early adoption is permitted as of the beginning of a fiscal year on or before November
15, 2007, provided the entity also elects to apply the provisions of FASB Statement No. 157,
Fair Value Measurements. This statement was effective for the Company for the fiscal year
beginning on January 1, 2008 and it did not have a material affect on its consolidated
financial statements. |
|
|
|
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), Business Combinations (FAS
141R), which replaces FASB Statement No. 141. FAS 141R establishes principles and
requirements for how an acquirer recognizes and measures in its financial statements the
identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed any non controlling interest in the
acquiree and the goodwill acquired. The Statement also establishes disclosure requirements
which will enable users to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business
combination. FAS 141R will be effective for Navios Holdings for fiscal year beginning on
January 1, 2009. Navios Holdings is currently evaluating the potential impact of the adoption
of FAS 141R on the its consolidated financial statements. |
F-23
|
|
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated
Financial Statementamendments of ARB No. 51 (SFAS No. 160). SFAS No. 160 states that
accounting and reporting for minority interests will be recharacterized as noncontrolling
interests and classified as a component of equity. The Statement also establishes reporting
requirements that provide sufficient disclosures that clearly identify and distinguish between
the interests of the parent and the interests of the noncontrolling owners. SFAS No. 160
applies to all entities that prepare consolidated financial statements, except not-for-profit
organizations, but will affect only those entities that have an outstanding noncontrolling
interest in one or more subsidiaries or that deconsolidate a subsidiary. This statement was
effective as of January 1, 2009. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact of
the adoption of SFAS No. 160 on its consolidated financial statements. |
|
|
|
In February 2008, the FASB issued the FASB Staff Position (FSP No. 157-2) which delays the
effective date of SFAS 157, for nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except for
items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a
recurring basis (at least annually). For purposes of applying this FSP, nonfinancial assets
and nonfinancial liabilities would include all assets and liabilities other that those meeting
the definition of a financial asset or financial liability as defined in paragraph 6 of FASB
Statement No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities This
FSP defers the effective date of SFAS 157 to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008,
and the interim periods within those fiscal years for items within the scope of this FSP. The
application of SFAS 157 in future periods to those items covered by FSP 157-2 is not expected
to have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements of the Company. |
|
|
|
In March 2008, the Financial Accounting Standard Board issued Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 161 (SFAS 161) Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133. SFAS 161 changes the disclosure
requirements for derivative instruments and hedging activities. Entities are required to
provide enhanced disclosures about (a) how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, (b)
how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under Statement 133 and
its related interpretations, and (c) how derivative instruments and related hedged items
affect an entitys financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. This statement
is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning
after November 15, 2008, with early application encouraged. This statement encourages, but
does not require, comparative disclosures for earlier periods at initial adoption. The Company
is currently evaluating the potential impact, if any, of the adoption of SFAS 161 on the
Companys consolidated financial statements. |
|
|
|
In April 2008, FASB issued FASB Staff Position FSP 142-3 Determination of the useful life of
intangible assets. This FASB Staff Position (FSP) amends the factors that should be
considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of
a recognized intangible asset under FASB Statement No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets. The intent of this FSP is to improve the consistency between the useful life of a
recognized intangible asset under Statement 142 and the period of expected cash flows used to
measure the fair value of the asset under FASB Statement No. 141 (revised 2007), Business
Combinations, and other U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). This FSP will
be effective for Navios Holdings for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and
interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is prohibited. The adoption of FSP
142-3 is not expected to have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements of
the Company. |
|
|
|
In May 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued FASB Statement No. 162, The
Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. The new standard is intended to
improve financial reporting by identifying a consistent framework, or hierarchy, for selecting
accounting principles to be used in preparing financial statements that are presented in
conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for nongovernmental
entities. Statement No. 162 is effective 60 days following the SECs approval of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board Auditing amendments to AU Section 411, The Meaning of
Present Fairly in Conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. The Company is
currently evaluating the potential impact, if any, of the adoption of SFAS 162 on the
Companys consolidated financial statements. |
F-24
|
|
In June 2008, FASB issued FASB Staff Position FSP EITF 03-6-1 Determining whether instruments
granted in share-based payment transactions are participating securities. This FASB Staff
Position (FSP) addresses whether instruments granted in share-based payment transactions are
participating securities prior to vesting and, therefore, need to be included in the earnings
allocation in computing earnings per share (EPS) under the two-class method described in
paragraphs 60 and 61 of FASB Statement No. 128, Earnings per Share. This FSP will be
effective for the Company for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim
periods within those fiscal years. All prior-period EPS data presented shall be adjusted
retrospectively (including interim financial statements, summaries of earnings, and selected
financial data) to conform with the provisions of this FSP. Early application is not
permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact, if any, of the adoption
of FSP EITF 03-6-1 on the Companys consolidated financial statements. |
|
|
|
In September 2008, Financial Accounting Standards Board issued FASB Staff Positions (FSP) FAS
133-1 and FIN 45-4 Disclosures about Credit Derivatives and Certain Guarantees: An Amendment
of FASB Statement No. 133 and FASB Interpretation No. 45; and Clarification of the Effective
Date of FASB Statement No. 161. This FSP amends FASB Statement No. 133, Accounting for
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, to require disclosures by sellers of credit
derivatives, including credit derivatives embedded in a hybrid instrument. This FSP also
amends FASB Interpretation No. 45, Guarantors Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for
Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others, to require an additional
disclosure about the current status of the payment/performance risk of a guarantee. Further,
this FSP clarifies the Boards intent about the effective date of FASB Statement No. 161,
Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. This FSP applies to credit
derivatives within the scope of Statement 133, hybrid instruments that have embedded credit
derivatives, and guarantees within the scope of Interpretation 45. This FSPs amendment to
Statement 133 also pertains to hybrid instruments that have embedded credit derivatives (for
example, credit-linked notes). The provisions of this FSP that amend Statement 133 and
Interpretation 45 shall be effective for reporting periods (annual or interim) ending after
November 15, 2008. This FSP encourages that the amendments to Statement 133 and Interpretation
45 be applied in periods earlier than the effective date to facilitate comparisons at initial
adoption. In periods after initial adoption, this FSP requires comparative disclosures only
for periods ending subsequent to initial adoption. The adoption of FSP 133-1 and FIN 45-4 is
not expected to have a material effect on the Companys consolidated financial statements. |
|
|
|
In October 2008, the FASB issued the FASB Staff Position (FSP No. 157-3) which clarifies the
application of FASB Statement No. 157, Fair Value Measurements in a market that is not
active and provides an example to illustrate key considerations in determining the fair value
of a financial asset when the market for that asset is not active. This FSP applies to
financial assets within the scope of accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair
value measurements in accordance with Statement 157. The FSP shall be effective upon issuance,
including prior periods for which financial statements have not been issued. Revisions
resulting from a change in the valuation technique or its application shall be accounted for
as a change in accounting estimate (FASB Statement No. 154 Accounting changes and Error
Corrections, paragraph 19). The disclosure provisions of Statement No. 154 for a change in
accounting estimate are not required for revisions resulting from a change in valuation
technique or its application. The application of FSP 157-3 did not have a material effect on
the consolidated financial statements of the Company. |
|
|
|
In November 2008, the FASB issued its final consensus on Issue 08-8 Accounting for an
instrument (or an embedded Feature) with a settlement amount that is based on the stock of an
entitys consolidated subsidiary This issue applies to freestanding financial instruments
(and embedded features) for which the payoff to the counterparty is based, in whole or in
part, on the stock of a consolidated subsidiary. This issue applies to those instruments (and
embedded features) in the consolidated financial statements of the parent, whether the
instrument was entered into by the parent or the subsidiary. This issue will be effective for
fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008 and interim periods within those fiscal
years. Early adoption is not permitted. The consensus shall be applied to outstanding
instruments as of the beginning of the fiscal year in which this issue is initially applied.
The adoption of Issue 08-8 is not expected to have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements of the Company. |
F-25
|
|
|
In November 2008, the FASB issued the EITF Issue No. 08-6 Equity Method Investment
Accounting Considerations (EITF 08-6) to clarify the accounting for certain transactions
and impairment considerations involving equity method investments. The FASB and the IASB
concluded a joint effort in converging the accounting for business combinations as well as
the accounting and reporting for noncontrolling interests culminating in the issuance of
Statement 141(R) and Statement 160. The objective of that joint effort was not to reconsider
the accounting for equity method investments; however, the application of the equity method
is affected by the accounting for business combinations and the accounting for consolidated
subsidiaries, which were affected by the issuance of Statement 141(R) and Statement 160. EITF
08-6 is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008, and interim
periods within those fiscal years, consistent with the effective dates of Statement 141(R)
and Statement 160. EITF 08-6 shall be applied prospectively. Earlier application by an entity
that has previously adopted an alternative accounting policy is not permitted. The adoption
of EITF 08-6 is not expected to have a material effect on the consolidated financial
statements of the Company. |
|
|
|
In December 2008, the FASB issued the FASB Staff Position (FSP FAS 140-4 and FIN 46(R)-8)
which amends FASB Statement No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial
Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities, to require public entities to provide additional
disclosures about transfers of financial assets. It also amends FASB Interpretation No. 46
(revised December 2003), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, to require public
enterprises, including sponsors that have a variable interest in a variable interest entity,
to provide additional disclosures about their involvement with variable interest entities.
Additionally, FSP FAS 140-4 and FIN 46(R)-8 requires certain disclosures to be provided by a
public enterprise that is (a) a sponsor of a qualifying special-purpose entity (SPE) that
holds a variable interest in the qualifying SPE but was not the transferor (nontransferor)
of financial assets to the qualifying SPE and (b) a servicer of a qualifying SPE that holds a
significant variable interest in the qualifying SPE but was not the transferor
(nontransferor) of financial assets to the qualifying SPE. FSP FAS 140-4 and FIN 46(R)-8 is
effective for the first reporting period (interim or annual) ending after December 15, 2008,
with earlier application encouraged. The adoption of FSP FAS 140-4 and FIN 46(R)-8 is not
expected to have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements of the Company. |
|
|
|
In January 2009, the FASB issued the FASB Staff Position Amendments to the Impairment
Guidance to EITF Issue No. 99-20 (FSP EITF 99-20-1) which amends the impairment guidance
in EITF Issue No.99-20, Recognition of Interest Income and Impairment on Purchased
Beneficial Interests and Beneficial Interests That Continue to Be Held by a Transferor in
Securitized Financial Assets, to achieve more consistent determination of whether an
other-than-temporary impairment has occurred. FSP EITF 99-20-1 also retains and emphasizes
the objective of an other-than-temporary impairment assessment and the related disclosure
requirements in FASB Statement No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and
Equity Securities, and other related guidance. FSP EITF 99-20-1 is effective for interim and
annual reporting periods ending after December 15, 2008, and shall be applied prospectively.
Retrospective application to a prior interim or annual reporting period is not permitted. The
adoption of FSP EITF 99-20-1 is not expected to have a material effect on the consolidated
financial statements of the Company. |
NOTE 3: ACQUISITION/REINCORPORATION
Acquisition of Horamar Group
On January 1, 2008, pursuant to a share purchase agreement, Navios Holdings contributed i)
$112,200 in cash and ii) the authorized capital stock of its wholly-owned subsidiary CNSA, in
exchange for the issuance and delivery of 12,765 shares of Navios Logistics, representing 63.8%
(67.2% excluding contingent consideration) of its outstanding stock. Navios Logistics acquired all
ownership interests in the Horamar Group (Horamar) in exchange for i) $112,200 in cash, of which
$5,000 were kept in escrow ($2,500 as of December 31, 2008) payable upon the attainment of certain
EBITDA targets during specified periods through December 2008 (the EBITDA Adjustment) and ii)
F-26
the issuance of 7,235 shares of Navios Logistics representing 36.2% (32.8% excluding contingent
consideration) of Navios Logistics outstanding stock, of which 1,007 shares were kept in escrow
(504 shares as of December 31, 2008) pending the EBITDA Adjustment.
In November 2008, part of the contingent consideration for the acquisition of Horamar was
released, as Horamar achieved the interim EBITDA target. Following the resolution of the
contingency, $2,500 in cash and 503 shares were released to the shareholders of Horamar. In
accordance with the amended share purchase agreement, the final EBITDA target may be resolved until
June 30, 2009.
Horamar is a privately held Argentina-based group that specializes in the transportation and
storage of liquid cargoes and the transportation of dry bulk cargoes in South America. The cash
contribution for the acquisition of Horamar was financed entirely by existing cash. Navios Holdings
expects this transaction to be accretive to its shareholders, both from a cash flow and from an
earnings standpoint. Through the acquisition of Horamar, Navios Holdings formed Navios Logistics,
an end-to-end logistics business through the combination of its existing port operations in Uruguay
with the barge and upriver port businesses that specializes in the transportation and storage of
liquid cargoes and the transportation of dry bulk cargoes in South America.
The table below shows the Companys determination of the cost of acquisition and how that cost
was allocated to the fair value of assets and liabilities at the acquisition date, January 1, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted purchase price |
|
|
|
|
Consideration to sellers (cash), excluding contingent consideration |
|
$ |
109,700 |
|
Fair value of 34.5% ownership in CNSA |
|
|
26,901 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total consideration given for 65.5% acquired interest in Horamar |
|
|
136,601 |
|
Proforma purchase price 100% |
|
|
208,552 |
|
Transaction
costs |
|
|
3,461 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total proforma purchase price 100% |
|
|
212,013 |
|
Fair value of assets and liabilities acquired |
|
|
|
|
Vessel fleet |
|
|
128,838 |
|
Petrosan port tangible assets |
|
|
12,557 |
|
Customer relationships |
|
|
35,490 |
|
Tradenames and trademarks |
|
|
10,420 |
|
Favorable contracts |
|
|
3,780 |
|
Favorable construction contracts |
|
|
7,600 |
|
Petrosan port operating rights |
|
|
3,060 |
|
Unfavorable contracts |
|
|
(3,010 |
) |
Deferred taxes |
|
|
(27,287 |
) |
Long term debt assumed |
|
|
(11,665 |
) |
Minority interests in subsidiaries of Horamar |
|
|
(31,050 |
) |
Other long term assets/liabilities |
|
|
488 |
|
Net working capital, including cash retained of $5,592 |
|
|
5,970 |
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of identifiable assets and liabilities of Horamar |
|
|
135,191 |
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
$ |
76,822 |
|
|
|
|
|
Following the release of the escrow in November 2008 as a result of Horamar achieving the interim
EBITDA target, goodwill increased by $11,638, to reflect the changes in minority interests. As of
December 31, 2008, excluding the remaining contingent consideration still in escrow, Navios
Holdings currently holds 65.5% of Navios Logistics outstanding stock.
Goodwill arising from the acquisition has all been allocated to the Companys Logistics
Business segment. None of the goodwill is deductible for tax purposes.
The acquired intangible assets and liabilities, listed below, as determined at the acquisition
date and where applicable, are amortized using the straight line method over the periods indicated
below:
F-27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
Year ended |
|
|
Amortization |
|
December 31, 2008 |
Description |
|
Period (Years) |
|
Amortization |
Customer relationships |
|
|
20 |
|
|
$ |
(1,775 |
) |
Tradenames and trademarks |
|
|
10 |
|
|
$ |
(1,042 |
) |
Favorable contracts |
|
|
4 |
|
|
$ |
(827 |
) |
Petrosan port operating rights |
|
|
20 |
|
|
$ |
(153 |
) |
Favorable construction contracts (*) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Unfavorable contracts |
|
|
2 |
|
|
$ |
1,505 |
|
|
|
|
(*) |
|
This amount is not amortized and when the vessel is delivered, will be capitalized as part of
the cost of the vessel and will be depreciated over the remaining useful life of the vessel. (Note
9) |
The following is a summary of the acquired identifiable intangible assets as of December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
Description |
|
Gross Amount |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Net Amount |
|
Customer relationships |
|
$ |
35,490 |
|
|
$ |
(1,774 |
) |
|
$ |
33,716 |
|
Tradenames and trademarks |
|
$ |
10,420 |
|
|
$ |
(1,042 |
) |
|
$ |
9,378 |
|
Favorable contracts |
|
$ |
3,780 |
|
|
$ |
(827 |
) |
|
$ |
2,953 |
|
Favorable construction contracts |
|
$ |
7,600 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
7,600 |
|
Petrosan port operating rights |
|
$ |
3,060 |
|
|
$ |
(153 |
) |
|
$ |
2,907 |
|
Unfavorable contracts |
|
$ |
(3,010 |
) |
|
$ |
1,505 |
|
|
$ |
(1,505 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals |
|
$ |
57,340 |
|
|
$ |
(2,291 |
) |
|
$ |
55,049 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents the unaudited pro forma results as if the acquisition had occurred on
January 1, 2007 (in thousands, except for amounts per share). As the acquisition was effective from
January 1, 2008, no pro forma results for the year ended December 31, 2008 have been presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
(unaudited) |
Gross revenues |
|
$ |
807,602 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
266,516 |
|
Basic earnings per share |
|
$ |
2.87 |
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
$ |
2.68 |
|
The unaudited pro forma results are for comparative purposes only and do not purport to be
indicative of the results that would have actually been obtained if the acquisition and related
financing had occurred at the beginning of the period presented. The basic and diluted earnings per
share calculations assume that the shares outstanding at December 31, 2007, were outstanding
throughout the period. See Note 22 for more information on earnings per share calculations.
Acquisition of Kleimar N.V.
On February 2, 2007, Navios Holdings acquired all of the outstanding share capital of Kleimar
N.V. (Kleimar) for a cash consideration of $165,600 (excluding direct acquisition costs),
subject to customary indemnification provisions (related to disclosed legal proceedings, etc). At
the time of the acquisition, Kleimar had outstanding debt of approximately $39,825.
Kleimar is a Belgian maritime transportation company established in 1993. At the time of the
acquisition, Kleimar had 11 employees and is the owner and operator of Capesize and Panamax vessels
used in the transportation of cargoes. It also has an extensive
Contract of Affreightment (COA) business, a large percentage of which involves transporting cargo to China.
F-28
Kleimar, as of the date of the acquisition, controlled 11 (including two long-term charter-in
vessels to be delivered) vessels, of which it has an ownership interest on three of them. The
long-term chartered-in fleet consists of four Capesize vessels and two Panamaxes.
Kleimar exercised its purchase option to acquire the Capesize vessel Navios Fantastiks (2005
built) in October 2007, for delivery during the second quarter of 2008. In April 2008, Navios
Holdings delivered the vessel Navios Fantastiks to Navios Partners. Kleimar also has a purchase
option on the Capesize vessel, Beaufiks (2004 built).
The purchase of Kleimar was financed by existing cash and the use of the $120,000 revolving
credit facility with HSH Nordbank AG. In addition to the strategic value of Kleimar, Navios
Holdings expects this transaction to be accretive to its shareholders, both from a cash flow and
earnings standpoint.
The table below shows the Companys determination of the cost of acquisition and how that cost
was allocated to the fair value of assets and liabilities at the acquisition date, February 2,
2007:
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted purchase price |
|
|
|
|
Consideration to sellers (cash) |
|
$ |
165,600 |
|
Cash retained |
|
|
(22,133 |
) |
Acquisition costs |
|
|
1,969 |
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted purchase price |
|
|
145,436 |
|
Fair Value of assets and liabilities acquired |
|
|
|
|
Investments in joint ventures |
|
|
26,750 |
|
Investment in finance lease (vessel Obeliks) |
|
|
47,846 |
|
Favorable purchase options held by Kleimar |
|
|
36,517 |
|
Favorable Leases |
|
|
226,093 |
|
Investment in finance lease (vessel Vanessa) |
|
|
19,959 |
|
Unfavorable purchase options held by third parties |
|
|
(15,890 |
) |
Unfavorable leases |
|
|
(120,109 |
) |
Deferred Taxes |
|
|
(53,019 |
) |
Long term loans (including current portion) |
|
|
(39,825 |
) |
Other long term assets |
|
|
180 |
|
Net working capital |
|
|
(13,087 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total fair value of assets and liabilities acquired |
|
|
115,415 |
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
$ |
30,021 |
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill arising from the acquisition has all been allocated to the Companys vessels
operations segment. None of the goodwill is deductible for tax purposes.
The acquired intangible assets and liabilities, listed below, as determined at the acquisition
date and where applicable, are amortized under the straight line method over the periods indicated
below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value as |
|
Average |
|
|
at acquisition |
|
Amortization |
Description |
|
date |
|
Period (Years) |
Favorable lease terms |
|
$ |
226,093 |
|
|
|
8.7 |
|
Favorable vessel purchase option (*) |
|
$ |
36,517 |
|
|
|
|
|
Unfavorable leases |
|
$ |
(120,109 |
) |
|
|
4.1 |
|
Unfavorable purchase options (**) |
|
$ |
(15,890 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
126,611 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-29
|
|
|
(*) |
|
This amount is not amortized and should the purchase options be exercised, any unamortized
portion of this asset will be capitalized as part of the cost of the vessel and will be
depreciated over the remaining useful life of the vessel. (Note 9) |
|
(**) |
|
The liability for purchase options held by third parties are not amortized
and if exercised by the third party the liability will be included in the
calculation of the gain or loss on sale of the related vessel. |
The following table presents the unaudited pro forma results as if the acquisition and related
financing had occurred at the beginning of 2007 (in thousands, except for amounts per share):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
2007 |
Gross revenues |
|
$ |
784,266 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
265,853 |
|
Basic earnings per share |
|
$ |
2.86 |
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
$ |
2.67 |
|
The unaudited pro forma results are for comparative purposes only and do not purport to be
indicative of the results that would have actually been obtained if the acquisition and related
financing had occurred at the beginning of each of the periods presented. The basic and diluted
earnings per share calculations assume the actual weighted average number of shares outstanding for
all periods presented. See Note 22 for more information on earnings per share calculations.
NOTE 4: CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
Cash and cash equivalents consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Cash on hand and at banks |
|
$ |
28,976 |
|
|
$ |
26,279 |
|
Short-term investments (Note 5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
92,135 |
|
Short-term deposits and highly liquid funds |
|
|
104,648 |
|
|
|
309,153 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
133,624 |
|
|
$ |
427,567 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short term deposits and highly liquid funds are comprised of deposits with banks with original
maturities of less than 90 days.
NOTE 5: SHORT TERM INVESTMENTS
Short term investments relate to commercial papers with original maturities of less than 90
days. These securities are bought and held principally for the purpose of selling them in the near
term and, therefore, have been classified as trading securities and are included in Cash and cash
equivalents in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet. During the year ended December 31,
2008 and 2007, such securities were used for general financing purposes.
At December 31, 2008, all of the securities had been sold. The fair value of these debt
securities was $92,135 at December 31, 2007. The unrealized holding gain on trading securities at
December 31, 2008, was $0 ($39 at December 31, 2007) and included in other income in the
consolidated statement of income.
NOTE 6: ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE, NET
Accounts receivable consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
$ |
118,123 |
|
|
$ |
110,643 |
|
Less: Provision for doubtful receivables |
|
|
(8,343 |
) |
|
|
(5,675 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivables, net |
|
$ |
109,780 |
|
|
$ |
104,968 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-30
Changes to the provisions for doubtful accounts are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
Charges to |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
Beginning of |
|
Costs and |
|
Amount |
|
End of |
Allowance for doubtful receivables |
|
Period |
|
expenses |
|
Utilized |
|
Period |
Year ended December 31, 2006 |
|
|
(411 |
) |
|
|
(6,242 |
) |
|
|
218 |
|
|
|
(6,435 |
) |
Year ended December 31, 2007 |
|
|
(6,435 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
760 |
|
|
|
(5,675 |
) |
Year ended December 31, 2008 |
|
|
(5,675 |
) |
|
|
(2,668 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,343 |
) |
Concentrations of credit risk with respect to accounts receivables are limited due to the
Companys large number of customers, who are internationally dispersed and have a variety of end
markets in which they sell. Due to these factors, management believes that no additional credit
risk beyond amounts provided for collection losses is inherent in the Companys trade receivables.
For the year ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 none of the customers accounted for more than 10% of
the Companys revenue and for the year ended December 31, 2006 two customers from the Vessel
Operations segment accounted for 10.0% and 12.3% each of the Companys revenue.
NOTE 7: PREPAID EXPENSES AND OTHER CURRENT ASSETS
Prepaid expenses and other current assets consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Prepaid voyage costs |
|
$ |
7,466 |
|
|
$ |
23,435 |
|
Claim receivables, net |
|
|
6,515 |
|
|
|
412 |
|
Advances to agents |
|
|
537 |
|
|
|
431 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
10,344 |
|
|
|
12,647 |
|
Acquisition expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,197 |
|
Prepaid taxes |
|
|
1,947 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
1,461 |
|
|
|
941 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
$ |
28,270 |
|
|
$ |
41,063 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Claims receivable mainly represent claims against vessels insurance underwriters in respect
of damages arising from accidents or other insured risks, as well as claims under charter contracts
including off-hires. While it is anticipated that claims receivable will be recovered within one
year, such claims may not all be recovered within one year due to the attendant process of
settlement. Nonetheless, amounts are classified as current as they represent amounts currently due
to the Company. All amounts are shown net of applicable deductibles.
NOTE 8: VESSELS, PORT TERMINAL AND OTHER FIXED ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Net Book |
|
Vessels |
|
Cost |
|
|
Depreciation |
|
|
Value |
|
Balance December 31, 2005 |
|
$ |
342,271 |
|
|
$ |
(3,188 |
) |
|
$ |
339,083 |
|
Additions |
|
|
160,243 |
|
|
|
(21,014 |
) |
|
|
139,229 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2006 |
|
|
502,514 |
|
|
|
(24,202 |
) |
|
|
478,312 |
|
Additions |
|
|
54,518 |
|
|
|
(24,444 |
) |
|
|
30,074 |
|
Disposals |
|
|
(151,431 |
) |
|
|
14,473 |
|
|
|
(136,958 |
) |
Transfer from investment in joint venture |
|
|
27,701 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,701 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2007 |
|
|
433,302 |
|
|
|
(34,173 |
) |
|
|
399,129 |
|
Additions |
|
|
133,932 |
|
|
|
(20,368 |
) |
|
|
113,564 |
|
Disposals |
|
|
(28,647 |
) |
|
|
219 |
|
|
|
(28,428 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
538,587 |
|
|
$ |
(54,322 |
) |
|
$ |
484,265 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Net Book |
|
Port Terminals |
|
Cost |
|
|
Depreciation |
|
|
Value |
|
Balance December 31, 2005 |
|
$ |
26,994 |
|
|
$ |
(295 |
) |
|
$ |
26,699 |
|
Additions |
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
(937 |
) |
|
|
(833 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2006 |
|
|
27,098 |
|
|
|
(1,232 |
) |
|
|
25,866 |
|
Additions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(917 |
) |
|
|
(917 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2007 |
|
|
27,098 |
|
|
|
(2,149 |
) |
|
|
24,949 |
|
Acquisition of subsidiary (Note 3) |
|
|
12,557 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,557 |
|
Additions |
|
|
4,770 |
|
|
|
(1,730 |
) |
|
|
3,040 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
44,425 |
|
|
$ |
(3,879 |
) |
|
$ |
40,546 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Net Book |
|
Tanker vessels, barges and push boats |
|
Cost |
|
|
Depreciation |
|
|
Value |
|
Balance December 31, 2005 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Additions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of subsidiary (Note 3) |
|
|
126,732 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
126,732 |
|
Additions |
|
|
93,941 |
|
|
|
(13,436 |
) |
|
|
80,505 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
220,673 |
|
|
$ |
(13,436 |
) |
|
$ |
207,237 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Net Book |
|
Other fixed assets |
|
Cost |
|
|
Depreciation |
|
|
Value |
|
Balance December 31, 2005 |
|
$ |
810 |
|
|
$ |
(595 |
) |
|
$ |
215 |
|
Additions |
|
|
1,098 |
|
|
|
(199 |
) |
|
|
899 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2006 |
|
|
1,908 |
|
|
|
(794 |
) |
|
|
1,114 |
|
Additions/acquisition of subsidiary |
|
|
744 |
|
|
|
(345 |
) |
|
|
399 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2007 |
|
|
2,652 |
|
|
|
(1,139 |
) |
|
|
1,513 |
|
Acquisition of subsidiary (Note 3) |
|
|
2,106 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,106 |
|
Disposals |
|
|
(258 |
) |
|
|
258 |
|
|
|
|
|
Additions |
|
|
2,466 |
|
|
|
(1,039 |
) |
|
|
1,427 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
6,966 |
|
|
$ |
(1,920 |
) |
|
$ |
5,046 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Net Book |
|
Total |
|
Cost |
|
|
Depreciation |
|
|
Value |
|
Balance December 31, 2005 |
|
$ |
370,075 |
|
|
$ |
(4,078 |
) |
|
$ |
365,997 |
|
Additions |
|
|
161,445 |
|
|
|
(22,150 |
) |
|
|
139,295 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2006 |
|
|
531,520 |
|
|
|
(26,228 |
) |
|
|
505,292 |
|
Additions/acquisition of subsidiary |
|
|
55,262 |
|
|
|
(25,706 |
) |
|
|
29,556 |
|
Disposals |
|
|
(151,431 |
) |
|
|
14,473 |
|
|
|
(136,958 |
) |
Transfer from investment in joint venture |
|
|
27,701 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,701 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2007 |
|
|
463,052 |
|
|
|
(37,461 |
) |
|
|
425,591 |
|
Acquisition of subsidiary (Note 3) |
|
|
141,395 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
141,395 |
|
Additions |
|
|
235,109 |
|
|
|
(36,573 |
) |
|
|
198,536 |
|
Disposals |
|
|
(28,905 |
) |
|
|
477 |
|
|
|
(28,428 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
810,651 |
|
|
$ |
(73,557 |
) |
|
$ |
737,094 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During December 2005 and January 2006, the Company acquired four vessels for a total
consideration of approximately $119,800 ($24,814 relates to vessel acquired in 2006) from companies
affiliated with the Companys CEO. The purchase price was paid with $80,300 ($15,200 relates to
vessel acquired in 2006) drawn from the Companys credit facility, $13,000 ($4,500 relates to
vessel acquired in 2006) from available cash and issuance of 5,500,854 shares of Companys common
stock. The stock issued in this transaction was valued at $4.96 per share for the first two
vessels, $4.82 per share for the third vessel and $4.42 for the fourth vessel, for a total value of
$25,500 (Note 18). The values per share are based on quoted market prices at the respective
delivery dates of the vessels.
Per SFAS 95, when some transactions are part cash and part non-cash, only the cash portion
shall be reported in the statement of cash flows. Hence, the non cash effect of this common stock
on Paid-in-Capital has been offset against the total consideration of the vessels and is disclosed
under non-cash investing and financing activities.
On April 19, 2007, Navios Holdings acquired all of the outstanding share capital of White
Narcissus Marine S.A. for a cash consideration of approximately $26,029. White Narcissus Marine
S.A. is a Panamanian corporation which held a 50% share of the vessel Asteriks (the remaining 50%
held by Kleimar). The 50% interest in the vessel, prior to the acquisition of White Narcissus
Marine S.A., was accounted for as an investment in joint venture. Following the acquisition, Navios
Holdings effectively owns 100% of the vessel and as such, from that date on it has reclassified its
interest in joint venture to vessels.
In July 2007, Navios Holdings entered into contracts for the acquisition of two Capesize
vessels to be built in South Korea, of 180,000 tons deadweight capacity, and are scheduled for
delivery in June 2009 and July 2009. Navios Holdings paid an amount of $50,087 (including interest
earned of $2,087) as a deposit for the purchase of these vessels and it is included in Deposits
for vessels acquisitions. One of the vessels is contracted to be sold to Navios Partners.
As of December 31, 2007, the Company deposited $2,055 and $3,415 in restricted accounts in
connection with the acquisition of Navios Orbiter and Navios Fantastiks, respectively.
As of December 31, 2008, Navios Holdings had executed all exercisable purchase options
comprising of four Ultra Handymax, six Panamax and one Capesize vessels. Navios Meridian, Navios
Mercator, Navios Arc, Navios Galaxy I, Navios Magellan, Navios Horizon, Navios Star, Navios
Hyperion, Navios Orbiter, Navios Aurora I and Navios Fantastiks were delivered on November 30,
2005, December 30, 2005, February 10, 2006, March 23, 2006, March 24, 2006, April 10, 2006,
December 4, 2006, February 26, 2007, February 7, 2008, April 24, 2008 and May 2, 2008,
respectively. The rights to Navios Fantastiks were sold to Navios Partners, on November 15, 2007,
while Navios Aurora I was sold to Navios Partners on July 1, 2008. The sale price of Navios Aurora
I consisted of $35,000 in cash and $44,936 in common units (3,131,415
common units) of Navios Partners. The investment in the 3,131,415 common units has been classified as Investments in
available for sale securities (see Note 2). The gain from the sale of Navios Aurora I was $51,508
of which $24,940 had been recognized at the time of sale in the statements of income under Gain on
sale of assets. The remaining $26,568 which represented profit to the extent of Navios Holdings
51.6% interest in Navios Partners had been deferred under Long term liabilities and deferred
income and is being recognized to income as the vessel is amortized over its remaining useful life
or until its sold. The portion to be amortized over the next year is classified under Deferred
income. A portion of the deferred gain would also be recognized if Navios Holdings interest in
Navios Partners decreases. As of December 31, 2008 the unamortized portion of the gain was $25,962,
of which $1,212 is classified under Deferred income. The amortization of deferred income is
included in Equity in net earnings of affiliated companies and joint venture in the statements of
income.
F-33
In December 2007, Navios Holdings entered into agreements for the acquisition of six Capesize
vessels to be built in South Korea of approximately 172,000 tons deadweight capacity each. On
November 4, 2008, Navios Holdings cancelled three of the above contracts for a total cancellation
fee of $1,500 which was expensed. The shipyard installments paid for the construction of these
vessels will be spread against the payments for the construction of the remaining three Capesize
vessels under construction by the same shipyard. The total acquisition cost of the remaining
Capesize vessels is approximately $338,900. An additional Capezise vessel will be built in Japan
with deadweight capacity of 180,000 tons. Their delivery is scheduled during the fourth quarter of
2009. Navios Holdings has paid as of December 31, 2008, an amount of $232,840 in cash and $20,000
in shares (1,397,624 common shares at $14.31 per share based on the price on the acquisition date
and disclosed under non-cash investing and financing activities in the statement of cash flows for
the year ended December 31, 2007) as interim payment for the purchase of these vessels and it is
included in Deposits for vessels acquisitions.
Since March 2008, Navios Logistics through its subsidiaries, entered into agreements for the
acquisition of a fleet for transporting dry and wet cargo on the river in the Hidrovia region. This
fleet consists of push boats, dry barges and wet barges. The fleet costs an aggregate of
approximately $72,000.
In June 2008 Navios Holdings entered into agreements to acquire two Ultra Handymax vessels for
its wholly owned fleet. The first vessel, Navios Ulysses, is a 2007 built, 55,728 dwt, Ultra
Handymax built in Japan and was delivered on October 10, 2008. The vessels purchase price was
approximately $79,123. The second vessel, Navios Vega, is a 58,792 dwt, 2009 built Ultra Handymax
built in Japan and was delivered on February 17, 2009 for an acquisition cost of approximately
$73,500, of which $40,000 was paid in cash and the remaining was paid through the issuance of a 2%
convertible bond with 3 years maturity. In December 31, 2008, Navios Holdings paid an amount of
$14,700 as deposit for the purchase of Navios Vega and it is included in Deposits for vessels
acquisitions.
In June 2008, Obeliks was sold for a cash consideration of approximately $35,090. The gain
from the sale of Obeliks recognized in the statement of income was $175.
In August 2008, Navios Holdings entered into agreements to acquire two Capesize vessels for
its wholly owned fleet. Total consideration for the vessels is $217,500. Navios Holdings paid an
amount of $83,900 as deposit for the purchase of these vessels and it is included in Deposits for
vessels acquisitions. Both vessels will be built in South Korea and are expected to be delivered
during the second and third quarter of 2009.
In September 2008, Navios Logistics began construction of a new silo at its port facility in
Uruguay. The silo is expected to be fully operational by the second
quarter of 2009 in time for the new crop season
and it will add an additional 80,000 metric tons of storage capacity. As of December 31, 2008,
Navios Logistics paid an amount of $4,770 for the construction of the new silo.
F-34
NOTE 9: INTANGIBLE ASSETS OTHER THAN GOODWILL
Intangible assets as of December 31, 2008 and 2007 consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
measurement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
due to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Transfer to |
|
|
acquisition of |
|
|
Net Book Value |
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
Acquisition Cost |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
vessel cost |
|
|
subsidiary |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
Trade name |
|
$ |
90,000 |
|
|
$ |
(10,467 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
10,420 |
|
|
$ |
89,953 |
|
Port terminal
operating rights |
|
|
31,000 |
|
|
|
(2,750 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,060 |
|
|
|
31,310 |
|
Customer relationships |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,774 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,490 |
|
|
|
33,716 |
|
Favorable construction
contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,600 |
|
|
|
7,600 |
|
Favorable lease terms |
|
|
269,277 |
|
|
|
(73,900 |
) |
|
|
(13,858 |
) |
|
|
3,780 |
|
|
|
185,299 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Intangible assets |
|
|
390,277 |
|
|
|
(88,891 |
) |
|
|
(13,858 |
) |
|
|
60,350 |
|
|
|
347,878 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unfavorable lease terms |
|
|
(127,513 |
) |
|
|
53,839 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,010 |
) |
|
|
(76,684 |
) |
Backlog assets |
|
|
14,830 |
|
|
|
(14,786 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
277,594 |
|
|
$ |
(49,838 |
) |
|
$ |
(13,858 |
) |
|
$ |
57,340 |
|
|
$ |
271,238 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disposals (*)/ |
|
|
Fair value measurement |
|
|
Net Book Value |
|
|
|
Acquisition |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Transfer to |
|
|
due to acquisition of |
|
|
December 31, |
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
Cost |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
vessel cost |
|
|
subsidiary |
|
|
2007 |
|
Trade name |
|
$ |
90,000 |
|
|
$ |
(6,607 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
83,393 |
|
Port terminal
operating rights |
|
|
31,000 |
|
|
|
(1,821 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,179 |
|
Favorable lease terms |
|
|
76,671 |
|
|
|
(44,000 |
) |
|
|
(65,888 |
) |
|
|
262,610 |
*** |
|
|
229,393 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Intangible
assets |
|
|
197,671 |
|
|
|
(52,428 |
) |
|
|
(65,888 |
) |
|
|
262,610 |
|
|
|
341,965 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unfavorable lease
terms |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,877 |
|
|
|
6,905 |
|
|
|
(135,999) |
** |
|
|
(96,217 |
) |
Backlog assets |
|
|
14,830 |
|
|
|
(12,332 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,498 |
|
Backlog liabilities |
|
|
(16,200 |
) |
|
|
16,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
196,301 |
|
|
$ |
(15,683 |
) |
|
$ |
(58,983 |
) |
|
$ |
126,611 |
|
|
$ |
248,246 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*) |
|
Disposals relate to sale of assets to Navios Partners (Notes 10 and 20). |
|
(**) |
|
Includes $15,890 of unfavorable purchase options held by third-parties
which are not amortized. If option is exercised by the third-party, the
liability will be included in the calculation of gain/loss on sale of
the related vessel. As of December 31, 2008 and 2007, no purchase
options have been exercised. |
|
(***) |
|
Includes $36,517 of favorable purchase options which are not amortized and should the
purchase options be exercised, any unamortized portion of this asset will be
capitalized as part of the cost of the vessel and will be depreciated over the
remaining useful life of the vessel. As of December 31, 2008 and 2007, $8,585 had been
transferred to the acquisition cost of vessels. |
F-35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
|
Expense |
|
|
Expense |
|
|
Expense |
|
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Trade name |
|
$ |
(3,860 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,808 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,812 |
) |
Port terminal operating rights |
|
|
(929 |
) |
|
|
(774 |
) |
|
|
(774 |
) |
Unfavorable lease terms |
|
|
22,543 |
|
|
|
32,877 |
|
|
|
|
|
Customer relationships |
|
|
(1,774 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Favorable lease terms |
|
|
(34,015 |
) |
|
|
(36,025 |
) |
|
|
(11,893 |
) |
Backlog assets |
|
|
(2,454 |
) |
|
|
(5,246 |
) |
|
|
(216 |
) |
Backlog liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,946 |
|
|
|
805 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(20,489 |
) |
|
$ |
(6,030 |
) |
|
$ |
(14,890 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The aggregate amortization of acquired intangibles for the next five years will be as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within one |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Five Year |
|
Description |
|
year |
|
|
Year Two |
|
|
Year Three |
|
|
Year Four |
|
|
Year Five |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
Trade name |
|
$ |
3,854 |
|
|
$ |
3,854 |
|
|
$ |
3,854 |
|
|
$ |
3,862 |
|
|
$ |
3,854 |
|
|
$ |
19,278 |
|
Favorable lease terms |
|
|
33,423 |
|
|
|
21,229 |
|
|
|
17,983 |
|
|
|
17,990 |
|
|
|
14,604 |
|
|
|
105,229 |
|
Unfavorable lease terms |
|
|
(17,543 |
) |
|
|
(11,584 |
) |
|
|
(6,688 |
) |
|
|
(6,136 |
) |
|
|
(5,101 |
) |
|
|
(47,052 |
) |
Port terminal operating rights |
|
|
927 |
|
|
|
927 |
|
|
|
927 |
|
|
|
930 |
|
|
|
927 |
|
|
|
4,638 |
|
Customer relationships |
|
|
1,775 |
|
|
|
1,775 |
|
|
|
1,775 |
|
|
|
1,775 |
|
|
|
1,775 |
|
|
|
8,875 |
|
Backlog asset port terminal |
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
22,480 |
|
|
$ |
16,201 |
|
|
$ |
17,851 |
|
|
$ |
18,421 |
|
|
$ |
16,059 |
|
|
$ |
91,012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 10: INVESTMENT IN AFFILIATES
Navios Maritime Partners L.P.
On August 7, 2007, Navios Holdings formed Navios Partners under the laws of Marshall Islands.
Navios GP L.L.C. (the General Partner), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Navios Holdings, was also
formed on that date to act as the general partner of Navios Partners and received a 2% general
partner interest.
In connection with the IPO of Navios Partners on November 16, 2007 Navios Holdings sold the
interests of its five wholly-owned subsidiaries, each of which owned a Panamax drybulk carrier, as
well as interests of its three wholly-owned subsidiaries that operated and had options to purchase
three additional vessels in exchange for (a) all of the net proceeds from the sale of an aggregate
of 10,500,000 common units in the IPO and to a corporation owned by Navios Partners Chairman and
CEO for a total amount of $193,300, plus (b) $160,000 of the $165,000 borrowings under Navios
Partners new revolving credit facility, (c) 7,621,843 subordinated units issued to Navios Holdings
and (d) the issuance to the General Partner of the 2% general partner interest and all incentive
distribution rights in Navios Partners. Upon the closing of the IPO, Navios Holdings owned a 43.2%
interest in Navios Partners, including the 2% general partner interest.
On or prior to the closing of the IPO, Navios Holdings entered into the following agreements
with Navios Partners: (a) a share purchase agreement pursuant to which Navios Holdings sold the
capital stock of a subsidiary that will own the Capesize vessel Navios TBN I and related time
charter, upon delivery of the vessel in June 2009; (b) a share purchase agreement pursuant to which
Navios Partners has the option, exercisable at any time between January 1, 2009 and April 1, 2009,
to acquire the capital stock of the subsidiary that will own the Capesize vessel Navios TBN II and
related time charter scheduled for delivery in October 2009; (c) a management agreement with Navios
Partners pursuant to which Navios ShipManagement Inc (the Manager) a wholly-owned subsidiary of
Navios Holdings, provides Navios Partners commercial and technical management services; (d) an
administrative services agreement with the Manager pursuant to which the Manager provides Navios
Partners administrative services; and (e) an omnibus agreement with Navios Partners, governing,
among other things, when Navios Partners and Navios Holdings may compete against each other as well
as rights of first offer on certain drybulk carriers.
F-36
On April 1, 2009, Navios Partners board of directors decided not to exercise the option to
acquire the capital stock of the subsidiary that will own the Capesize vessel Navios TBN II due to
unfavorable conditions in the capital markets.
Navios Partners is engaged in the seaborne transportation services of a wide range of drybulk
commodities including iron ore, coal, grain and fertilizer, chartering its vessels under medium to
long term charters. The operations of Navios Partners are managed by the Manager from its offices
in Piraeus, Greece.
As of December 31, 2008, the carrying amount of the investment in Navios Partners accounted
for under the equity method was $4,629. As part of the consideration from the sale of Navios
Aurora I to Navios Partners in July 2008, the Company received 3,131,415 common units of Navios
Partners. The 3,131,415 common units represent 14.4% of the outstanding units of Navios Partners
and are accounted for under investment in available for sale securities. As of December 31, 2008,
the carrying amount of the investment in common units was $22,358.
As of December 31, 2007, the carrying amount of the investment in Navios Partners was $32.
Dividends received during the year ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 were $11,322 and $0,
respectively.
Acropolis Chartering and Shipping Inc.
Navios Holdings has a 50% interest in Acropolis Chartering & Shipping, Inc. (Acropolis), a
brokerage firm for freight and shipping charters. Although Navios Holdings owns 50% of the stock,
the two shareholders have agreed that the earnings and amounts declared by way of dividends will be
allocated 35% to the Company with the balance to the other shareholder. As of December 31, 2008 and
2007, the carrying amount of the investment was $713 and $1,047, respectively. Dividends received
for each of the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, were $1,928, $678, and $583,
respectively.
Navios Maritime Acquisition Corporation
On July 1, 2008, the Company completed the IPO of units in its subsidiary, Navios Acquisition,
a blank check company. In the offering, Navios Acquisition sold 25,300,000 units for an aggregate
purchase price of $253,000. Simultaneously with the completion of the IPO, the Company purchased
Private Placement Warrants of Navios Acquisition for an aggregate purchase price of $7,600. Prior
to the IPO, Navios Holdings had purchased 8,625,000 Sponsor Units for a total consideration of $25,
of which an aggregate of 290,000 units were transferred to the Companys officers and directors and
an aggregate of 2,300,000 Sponsor Units were returned to Navios Acquisition and cancelled upon
receipt. Each unit consists of one share of Navios Acquisitions common stock and one warrant
(Sponsor Warrants, together with the Private Placement Warrants, the Navios Acquisition
Warrants). Currently, the Company owns approximately 6,035,000 (19%) of the outstanding common
stock of Navios Acquisition. Navios Acquisition is no longer a wholly-owned subsidiary of the
Company but accounted for under the equity method due to the Companys significant influence over
Navios Acquisition.
As of December 31, 2008, the carrying amount of the investment in Navios Acquisition was $253
(2007: $0)
Summarized financial information of the affiliated companies is presented below:
F-37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
Navios |
|
Navios |
|
|
|
|
|
Navios |
|
|
Balance Sheet |
|
Partners |
|
Acquisition (**) |
|
Acropolis |
|
Partners |
|
Acropolis |
Current assets |
|
|
29,058 |
|
|
|
252,258 |
|
|
|
2,262 |
|
|
|
11,312 |
|
|
|
4,746 |
|
Non-current assets |
|
|
293,849 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
193,742 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
46,401 |
|
|
|
9,222 |
|
|
|
364 |
|
|
|
6,612 |
|
|
|
1,900 |
|
Non-current liabilities |
|
|
199,659 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
171,656 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
Year Ended |
|
Year Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Navios |
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
|
Navios |
|
Acquisition |
|
|
|
|
|
Navios |
|
|
|
|
|
Navios |
|
|
Income Statement |
|
Partners |
|
(**) |
|
Acropolis |
|
Partners(*) |
|
Acropolis |
|
Partners (*) |
|
Acropolis |
Revenue |
|
|
75,082 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,423 |
|
|
|
50,352 |
|
|
|
5,302 |
|
|
|
31,764 |
|
|
|
2,909 |
|
Net Income |
|
|
28,758 |
|
|
|
1,155 |
|
|
|
4,558 |
|
|
|
19,508 |
|
|
|
2,789 |
|
|
|
6,624 |
|
|
|
1,927 |
|
|
|
|
(*) |
|
The summarized financial information of Navios Partners for the years ended December 31,
2007 and 2006 include balances that were carved-out from Navios Holdings prior to the IPO on
November 16, 2007. |
|
(**) |
|
Navios Acquisition was incorporated in July 2008, and therefore, no financial data for
periods prior to 2008 exists. |
NOTE 11: ACCRUED EXPENSES
Accrued expenses consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Payroll |
|
$ |
5,762 |
|
|
$ |
1,617 |
|
Accrued interest |
|
|
7,465 |
|
|
|
4,172 |
|
Accrued voyage expenses |
|
|
10,401 |
|
|
|
8,208 |
|
Accrued running costs |
|
|
2,072 |
|
|
|
1,576 |
|
Provision for losses on voyages in progress |
|
|
2,339 |
|
|
|
12,395 |
|
Audit fees and related services |
|
|
391 |
|
|
|
1,620 |
|
Finance fees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
545 |
|
Relocation reserve |
|
|
|
|
|
|
330 |
|
Accrued taxes |
|
|
2,330 |
|
|
|
|
|
Professional fees |
|
|
933 |
|
|
|
5,828 |
|
Other accrued expenses |
|
|
2,775 |
|
|
|
1,635 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accrued expenses |
|
$ |
34,468 |
|
|
$ |
37,926 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 12: BORROWINGS
Borrowings consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Loan Facility HSH Nordbank and Commerzbank A.G. |
|
$ |
250,956 |
|
|
$ |
271,750 |
|
Revolver Facility HSH Nordbank and Commerzbank A.G. |
|
|
80,667 |
|
|
|
|
|
Loan Facility Emporiki Bank |
|
|
51,060 |
|
|
|
17,020 |
|
F-38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Loan DVB Bank |
|
|
17,360 |
|
|
|
18,480 |
|
Loan Dexia Bank and Fortis Bank |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,650 |
|
Loan DNB NOR Bank |
|
|
18,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Loan Marfin Egnatia Bank |
|
|
70,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving credit facility Marfin Egnatia Bank |
|
|
90,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other long term loans |
|
|
11,328 |
|
|
|
|
|
Senior notes |
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total borrowing |
|
|
889,371 |
|
|
|
615,900 |
|
Less unamortized discount |
|
|
(1,656 |
) |
|
|
(1,851 |
) |
Less current portion |
|
|
(15,177 |
) |
|
|
(14,220 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long term borrowings |
|
$ |
872,538 |
|
|
$ |
599,829 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior notes: In December 2006, the Company issued $300,000 senior notes at 9.5% fixed rate
due on December 15, 2014. Part of the net proceeds from the issuance of these senior notes of
approximately $290,000 were used to repay in full the remaining principal amounts under three
tranches of approximately $241,100 and the remaining proceeds were applied pro-rata among the
remaining tranches under the credit facility discussed above. The senior notes are fully and
unconditionally guaranteed, jointly and severally and on an unsecured senior basis, by all of
Companys subsidiaries, other than the Uruguayan subsidiary. The Company has the option to redeem
the notes in whole or in part, at any time (1) before December 15, 2010, at a redemption price
equal to 100% of the principal amount, (2) on or after December 15, 2010, at redemption prices as
defined in the agreement and (c) at any time before December 15, 2009, up to 35% of the aggregate
principal amount of the notes with the net proceeds of a public equity offering at 109.5% of the
principal amount of the notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, so long as at least 65% of
the originally issued aggregate principal amount of the notes remains outstanding after such
redemption. Furthermore, upon occurrence of certain change of control events, the holders of the
notes may require the Company to repurchase some or all of the notes at 101% of their face amount.
Pursuant to the covenant regarding asset sales, the Company has to repay the senior notes at par
plus interest with the proceeds of certain asset sales if the proceeds from such asset sales are
not reinvested in the business within a specified period or used to pay secured debt. Under a
registration rights agreement the Company and the guarantors filed a registration statement no
later than June 25, 2007 which became effective on July 5, 2007, enabling the holders of notes to
exchange the privately placed notes with publicly registered notes with identical terms. The senior
notes contain covenants which, among other things, limit the incurrence of additional indebtedness,
issuance of certain preferred stock, the payment of dividends, redemption or repurchase of capital
stock or making restricted payments and investments, creation of certain liens, transfer or sale of
assets, entering in transactions with affiliates, merging or consolidating or selling all or
substantially all of Companys properties and assets and creation or designation of restricted
subsidiaries.
Loan Facilities: In February 2007, Navios Holdings entered into a secured Loan Facility with
HSH Nordbank and Commerzbank AG maturing on October 31, 2014. The facility is composed of a
$280,000 Term Loan Facility and a $120,000 reducing Revolver Facility. In April 2008, the Company
entered into an agreement for the amendment of the facility due to a prepayment of $10,000. The
term loan facility was repayable in 24 quarterly payments of $2,750, seven quarterly payments of
$5,875 and a balloon payment of $172,875. After the amendment the term loan facility is repayable
in 19 quarterly payments of $2,647, seven quarterly payments of $5,654 and a balloon payment of
$166,382. The revolver credit facility is available for future acquisitions and general corporate
and working capital purposes. As of December 31, 2008, the amount available under the revolver
facility was $22,333 and the amount drawn was $80,667. The interest rate of the facility was LIBOR
plus a spread ranging from 65 to 125 basis points as defined in the agreement.
The loan facility requires compliance with the covenants contained in the senior notes. The
loan facility also requires compliance with financial covenants including, specified Security Value
Maintenance (SVM) to total debt percentage and minimum liquidity. It is an event of default under
the credit facility if such covenants are not complied with or if Angeliki Frangou, the Companys
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, beneficially owns less than 20% of the issued stock.
F-39
In March 2009, Navios Holdings amended its facility agreement with HSH Nordbank and
Commerzbank A.G., effective as of November 15, 2008, as follows: (a) to reduce the SVM ratio (ratio
of the charter-free valuations of the mortgaged vessels over the outstanding loan amount) from 125%
to 100%; (b) to obligate Navios Holdings to accumulate cash reserves into a pledged account with
the agent bank of $14,000 ($5,000 in March 2009 and $1,125 on each loan repayment date during 2009
and 2010, starting from January 2009); and (c) to set the margin at 200 bps. The amendment is
effective until January 31, 2010. At December 31, 2008, Navios Holdings was in compliance with the
financial covenants, including the SVM ratio, as required under its amended facility agreement.
However, if Navios Holdings was required to use the original SVM ratio on December 31, 2008 to test
compliance, it may not have been in compliance.
In December 2007, Navios Holdings entered into a new facility agreement with Emporiki Bank of
Greece of up to $154,000 in order to partially finance the construction of two Capesize bulk
carriers scheduled to be delivered in December 2009 and February 2010. The principal amount is
available for partial drawdown according to terms of the payment of the shipbuilding contracts. As
of December 31, 2008, the amount drawn was $51,060. The facility is repayable upon delivery of the
Capesize vessels in 10 semi-annual installments of $6,250 and 10 semi-annual installments of $4,500
with a final payment of $46,500 on the last payment date. The interest rate of the facility is
LIBOR plus a margin of 80 basis points.
The loan facility requires compliance with the covenants contained in the senior notes. After
the delivery of the vessels the loan also requires compliance with certain financial covenants.
On March 31, 2008 Nauticler S.A. entered into a $70,000 loan facility for the purpose of
providing Nauticler S.A. with investment capital to be used in connection with one or more
investment projects. The loan is repayable in one installment by March 2011 and bears interest at
LIBOR plus 1.75%.
In June 2008, Navios Holdings entered into a new facility agreement with DNB NOR BANK ASA of
up to $133,000 in order to partially finance the construction of two Capesize bulk carriers. The
principal amount is available for partial drawdown according to terms of the payment of the
shipbuilding contracts. As of December 31, 2008, the amount drawn was $18,000. The facility is
repayable upon delivery of the Capesize vessels in 16 semi-annual installments of $3,700 with a
final payment of $73,800 on the last payment date. The interest rate of the facility is LIBOR plus
a margin of 100 basis points as defined in the agreement.
In December 2008, Navios Holdings entered into a $90,000 revolving credit facility with Marfin
Egnatia Bank for general corporate purposes. The loan is repayable in one installment in December
2010 and bears interest at LIBOR plus 2.75%.
Loans Assumed: The as at December 31, 2008 outstanding credit facilities assumed upon
acquisition of Kleimar and Horamar are described below.
On August 4, 2005, Kleimar entered into a $21,000 loan facility with DVB Bank for the purchase
of a vessel. The loan is repayable in 20 quarterly installments of $280 each with a final balloon
payment of $15,400 in August 2010. The loan is secured by a mortgage on a vessel together with
assignment of earnings and insurances. As of December 31, 2008, $17,360 was outstanding under this
facility.
In connection with the acquisition of Horamar, the Company assumed a $9,500 loan facility that
was entered into by HS Shipping LTD Inc. in 2006, in order to finance the building of a 8,900 DWT
double hull tanker (MALVA H). The loan bears interest at LIBOR plus 5.5% during the construction
period, which lasted until February 2008. After the vessel delivery the interest rate is LIBOR plus
1.5%. The loan will be repaid by installments that shall not be less than 90 per cent of the amount
of the last hire payment due to be paid to HS Shipping Ltd Inc. The repayment date should not
exceed the 31st of December 2011. The loan can be pre-paid before such date, with a 2 days written
notice. Borrowings under the loan are subject to certain financial covenants and restrictions on
dividend payments and other related items. As of December 31, 2008 HS Shipping Ltd Inc. is in
compliance with all the covenants.
In connection with the acquisition of Horamar, the Company assumed a $2,286 loan facility that
was entered into by Thalassa Energy S.A. in October 2007, in order to finance the purchase of two self-propelled barges (Formosa and San Lorenzo). The loan bears interest at LIBOR plus 1.5%. The
loan will be repaid by 5 equal installments of $457 on November 2008, June 2009, January 2010,
August 2010 and March 2011. Borrowings under the loan are subject to certain financial covenants
and restrictions on dividend payments and other related items. As of December 31, 2008 Thalassa
Energy S.A. is in compliance with all the covenants. The loan is secured by a first priority
mortgage over the two self-propelled barges (Formosa and San Lorenzo).
F-40
The maturity table below reflects the principal payments of all credit facilities outstanding
as of December 31, 2008 for the next 5 years and thereafter are based on the repayment schedule of
the respective loan facilities (as described above) and the outstanding amount due under the senior
notes. The maturity table below includes in the amount shown for 2014 and thereafter future
principal payments of the undrawn portion of credit facilities associated with the financing of the
construction of Capesize vessels scheduled to be delivered on various dates throughout 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
Year |
|
Amount in thousands of USD |
2009 |
|
|
15,177 |
|
2010 |
|
|
142,642 |
|
2011 |
|
|
104,046 |
|
2012 |
|
|
27,587 |
|
2013 |
|
|
27,235 |
|
2014 and thereafter |
|
|
572,684 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
889,371 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 13: DERIVATIVES AND FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
Warrants
The Company accounts for the Navios Acquisition Warrants (see Note 1), which were obtained in
connection with its investment Navios Acquisition under SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities (SFAS 133). SFAS 133 establishes accounting and reporting
standards for derivative instruments and other hedging activities. In accordance with SFAS 133, the
Company records the Navios Acquisition Warrants in the consolidated balance sheets under Long term
derivative assets at fair value, with changes in fair value recorded in Other expense in the
consolidated statements of income.
During the year ended December 31, 2008, the changes in net unrealized holding losses on
warrants amounted to $5,282 ($0 for the year ended December 31, 2007).
Interest rate risk
The Company entered into interest rate swap contracts as economic hedges to its exposure to
variability in its floating rate long term debt. Under the terms of the interest rate swaps, the
Company and the bank agreed to exchange at specified intervals, the difference between paying fixed
rate and floating rate interest amount calculated by reference to the agreed principal amounts and
maturities. Interest rate swaps allow the Company to convert long-term borrowings issued at
floating rates into equivalent fixed rates. Even though the interest rate swaps were entered into
for economic hedging purposes, the derivatives described below do not qualify for accounting
purposes as cash flow hedges, under FASB Statement No. 133, Accounting for derivative instruments
and hedging activities, as the Company does not have currently written contemporaneous
documentation, identifying the risk being hedged, and both on a prospective and retrospective
basis, performed an effective test supporting that the hedging relationship is highly effective.
Consequently, the Company recognizes the change in fair value of these derivatives in the statement
of income.
The principal terms of the interest rate swaps outstanding at December 31, 2008 and 2007 are
as follows:
F-41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
Royal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HSH |
|
Bank of |
|
Fortis Bank |
|
Dexia Bank |
|
Dexia Bank |
|
Alpha |
Counterparty |
|
Nordbank |
|
Scotland |
|
Belgium |
|
Belgium |
|
Belgium |
|
Bank |
|
Notional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
USD 79,345
declining 20,796
15,330 at resetting
days until maturity
date
|
|
USD 10,937
declining 437 at
resetting dates
until maturity date
|
|
USD 6,500 declining
131 at resetting
dates until
maturity date
|
|
USD 21,000
declining 280 at
resetting dates
until maturity date
|
|
USD 6,500 declining
131 at resetting
dates until
maturity date
|
|
USD 9,500 declining
250 at resetting
dates until
maturity date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Terms
|
|
3 months LIBOR for
5.52%
|
|
Floor
6 months LIBOR
5.55% Cap 6 months
LIBOR 7.5% |
|
3 months LIBOR for
3.95%
|
|
3 months LIBOR for
4.525%
|
|
3 months LIBOR for
3.95%
|
|
Floor 3 months
LIBOR 5.65% Cap 6
months LIBOR 7.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Resets
|
|
Quarterly
|
|
April and October |
|
Quarterly
|
|
Quarterly
|
|
Quarterly
|
|
Quarterly |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inception
|
|
December 2007
|
|
April 2001
|
|
May 2004
|
|
August 2005
|
|
May 2004
|
|
July
2001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturity
|
|
September 2009
|
|
October 2010
|
|
April 2009
|
|
August 2010
|
|
April 2009
|
|
July 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Royal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HSH |
|
HSH |
|
Bank of |
|
Fortis Bank |
|
Dexia Bank |
|
Dexia Bank |
|
Alpha |
Counterparty |
|
Nordbank |
|
Nordbank |
|
Scotland |
|
Belgium |
|
Belgium |
|
Belgium |
|
Bank |
|
Notional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
USD 82,000
declining 18,500 at
resetting dates
until maturity date
|
|
USD 79,345
declining 20,796 -
15,330 at resetting
days until maturity
date
|
|
USD 10,937
declining 437 at
resetting dates
until maturity date
|
|
USD 6,500 declining
131 at resetting
dates until
maturity date
|
|
USD 21,000
declining 280 at
resetting dates
until maturity date
|
|
USD 6,500 declining
131 at resetting
dates until
maturity date
|
|
USD 9,500 declining
250 at resetting
dates until
maturity date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Terms
|
|
Floor
3 months LIBOR
4.45% Cap 3 months
LIBOR 5%
|
|
3 months LIBOR for
5.52%
|
|
Floor
6 months LIBOR
5.55% Cap 6 months
LIBOR 7.5%
|
|
3 months LIBOR for
3.95%
|
|
3 months LIBOR for
4.525%
|
|
3 months LIBOR for
3.95%
|
|
Floor 3 months
LIBOR 5.65% Cap 6
months LIBOR 7.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Resets
|
|
Quarterly
|
|
Quarterly
|
|
April and
October
|
|
Quarterly
|
|
Quarterly
|
|
Quarterly
|
|
Quarterly |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inception
|
|
March 2007
|
|
December
2007
|
|
April
2001
|
|
May 2004
|
|
August 2005
|
|
May 2004
|
|
July
2001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturity
|
|
June 2008
|
|
September
2009
|
|
October
2010
|
|
April 2009
|
|
August 2010
|
|
April 2009
|
|
July
2010 |
F-42
For the year ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, the realized gain/(loss) on interest rate
swaps was $(2,351), $225 and $85, respectively. As of December 31, 2008 and 2007, the outstanding
net liability was $2,907 and $2,364, respectively. The unrealized gain/(loss) as of December 31,
2008, 2007 and 2006, was $(1,874), $(1,279) and $85, respectively.
The swap agreements have been entered into by subsidiaries. The Royal Bank of Scotland swap
agreements have been collateralized by a cash deposit of $1,200. The Alpha Bank swap agreement has
been guaranteed by the Company. The HSH Nordbank swap agreements are bound by the same securities
as the secured credit facility. The Dexia Bank Belgium swap agreements have been collateralized by
a cash deposit of $1,100.
Forward Freight Agreements (FFAs)
The Company actively trades in the FFAs market with both an objective to utilize them as
economic hedging instruments that are highly effective in reducing the risk on specific vessel(s),
freight commitments, or the overall fleet or operations, and to take advantage of short term
fluctuations in the market prices. FFAs trading generally have not qualified as hedges for
accounting purposes, except as discussed below, and as such, the trading of FFAs could lead to
material fluctuations in the Companys reported results from operations on a period to period
basis.
Dry bulk shipping FFAs generally have the following characteristics: they cover periods from
one month to one year; they can be based on time charter rates or freight rates on specific quoted
routes; they are executed between two parties and give rise to a certain degree of credit risk
depending on the counterparties involved and they are settled monthly based on publicly quoted
indices.
For FFAs that qualify for hedge accounting the changes in fair values of the effective portion
representing unrealized gain or losses are recorded under Accumulated Other Comprehensive
Income/(Loss) in the stockholders equity while the unrealized gains or losses of the FFAs not
qualifying for hedge accounting together with the ineffective portion of those qualifying for hedge
accounting, are recorded in the statement of operations under Gain/(Loss) on Forward Freight
Agreements. The gains/(losses) included in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income/(Loss) are
being reclassified to earnings under Revenue in the statement of operations in the same period or
periods during which the hedged forecasted transaction affects earnings. The reclassification to
earnings commenced in the third quarter of 2006 and extended until December 31, 2008, depending on
the period or periods during which the hedged forecasted transactions will affect earnings. All of
the amount included in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income/(Loss) had been reclassified to
earnings as of December 31, 2008. For the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, $19,939 and
$9,816 and $4,171 losses, respectively, included in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income/
(Loss), were reclassified to earnings.
At December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, none of the mark to market positions of the open
dry bulk FFA contract, qualified for hedge accounting treatment. Dry bulk FFAs traded by the
Company that do not qualify for hedge accounting are shown at fair value through the statement of
operations.
The net gains (losses) from FFAs amounted to $16,244, $26,379 and $19,786, for the years ended
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
During each of the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, the changes in net unrealized
(losses) gains on FFAs amounted to $(8,220), $12,232 and $12,484, respectively.
The open dry bulk shipping FFAs at net contracted (strike) rate after consideration of the
fair value settlement rates is summarized as follows:
F-43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
Forward Freight Agreements (FFAs) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Short term FFA derivative asset |
|
$ |
130,844 |
|
|
$ |
265,627 |
|
Long term FFA derivative asset |
|
|
34,379 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
Short term FFA derivative liability |
|
|
(126,577 |
) |
|
|
(255,337 |
) |
Long term FFA derivative liability |
|
|
(23,159 |
) |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net fair value on FFA contracts |
|
$ |
15,487 |
|
|
$ |
10,357 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOS FFAs portion of fair value
transferred to NOS derivative
account (*) |
|
$ |
(15,470 |
) |
|
$ |
(32,524 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LCH FFAs portion of fair value
transferred to LCH derivative
account (**) |
|
$ |
98,782 |
|
|
$ |
(49,120 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The open interest rate swaps, after consideration of their fair value, are summarized as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
Interest Rate Swaps |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Short term interest rate swap asset |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
55 |
|
Long term interest rate swap asset |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short term interest rate swap liability |
|
|
(2,375 |
) |
|
|
(1,624 |
) |
Long term interest rate swap liability |
|
|
(532 |
) |
|
|
(795 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net fair value of interest rate swap contract |
|
$ |
(2,907 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,364 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciliation of balances
Total of balances related to derivatives and financial instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
FFAs |
|
$ |
15,487 |
|
|
$ |
10,357 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOS FFAs portion of
fair value
transferred to NOS
derivative account
(*) |
|
|
(15,470 |
) |
|
|
(32,524 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LCH FFAs portion of
fair value
transferred to LCH
derivative account
(**) |
|
|
98,782 |
|
|
|
(49,120 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants |
|
|
2,318 |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
|
(2,907 |
) |
|
|
(2,364 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
98,210 |
|
|
$ |
(73,651 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Values
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Total short term derivative asset |
|
$ |
214,156 |
|
|
$ |
184,038 |
|
Total long term derivative asset |
|
|
36,697 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
Total short term derivative liability |
|
|
(128,952 |
) |
|
|
(256,961 |
) |
Total long term derivative liability |
|
|
(23,691 |
) |
|
|
(818 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
98,210 |
|
|
$ |
(73,651 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*) |
|
NOS: The Norwegian Futures and Options Clearing House (NOS Clearing ASA). |
|
(**) |
|
LCH: The London Clearing House. |
F-44
Fair value of financial instruments
The Following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of
financial instrument:
Cash and cash equivalents: The carrying amounts reported in the consolidated balance sheets
for interest bearing deposits approximate their fair value because of the short maturity of these
investments.
Forward Contracts: The estimated fair value of forward contracts and other assets was
determined based on quoted market prices.
Borrowings: The carrying amount of the floating rate loans approximates its fair value.
Only the senior notes have a fixed rate and their fair value is indicated in the table below.
Interest rate swaps: The fair value of the interest rate swaps is the estimated amount that
the Company would receive or pay to terminate the swaps at the reporting date by obtaining quotes
from financial institutions.
Forward freight agreements: The fair value of forward freight agreements is the estimated
amount that the Company would receive or pay to terminate the agreement at the reporting date by
obtaining quotes from brokers or exchanges.
The estimated fair values of the Companys financial instruments are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
Book Value |
|
Fair Value |
|
Book Value |
|
Fair Value |
Cash and cash equivalent |
|
|
133,624 |
|
|
|
133,624 |
|
|
|
427,567 |
|
|
|
427,567 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
17,858 |
|
|
|
17,858 |
|
|
|
83,697 |
|
|
|
83,697 |
|
Trade receivables |
|
|
109,780 |
|
|
|
109,780 |
|
|
|
104,968 |
|
|
|
104,968 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
(72,520 |
) |
|
|
(72,520 |
) |
|
|
(106,665 |
) |
|
|
(106,665 |
) |
Senior notes |
|
|
(298,344 |
) |
|
|
(178,488 |
) |
|
|
(298,149 |
) |
|
|
(308,295 |
) |
Long term debt |
|
|
(589,371 |
) |
|
|
(589,371 |
) |
|
|
(315,900 |
) |
|
|
(315,900 |
) |
Available for sale securities |
|
|
22,358 |
|
|
|
22,358 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
|
(2,907 |
) |
|
|
(2,907 |
) |
|
|
(2,364 |
) |
|
|
(2,364 |
) |
Warrants |
|
|
2,318 |
|
|
|
2,318 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forward Freight Agreements, net |
|
|
15,487 |
|
|
|
15,487 |
|
|
|
10,357 |
|
|
|
10,357 |
|
The following tables set forth by level our assets and liabilities that are measured at
fair value on a recurring basis. As required by SFAS No. 157, assets and liabilities and are
categorized in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair
value measurement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements as of December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in |
|
|
Significant Other |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active Markets for |
|
|
Observable |
|
|
Unobservable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identical Assets |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
Inputs |
|
Assets |
|
Total |
|
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
FFAs |
|
$ |
165,223 |
|
|
$ |
165,223 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Navios Acquisition Warrants |
|
|
2,318 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,318 |
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in available for sale securities |
|
|
22,358 |
|
|
|
22,358 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
189,899 |
|
|
$ |
187,581 |
|
|
$ |
2,318 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements as of December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in |
|
|
Significant Other |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active Markets for |
|
|
Observable |
|
|
Unobservable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identical Assets |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
Inputs |
|
Liabilities |
|
Total |
|
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
FFAs |
|
$ |
149,736 |
|
|
$ |
149,736 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Interest rate swap contracts |
|
|
2,907 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,907 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
152,643 |
|
|
$ |
149,736 |
|
|
$ |
2,907 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements as of December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in |
|
|
Significant Other |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active Markets for |
|
|
Observable |
|
|
Unobservable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identical Assets |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
Inputs |
|
Assets |
|
Total |
|
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
FFAs |
|
$ |
265,717 |
|
|
$ |
265,717 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Interest rate swap contracts |
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
265,772 |
|
|
$ |
265,717 |
|
|
$ |
55 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements as of December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in |
|
|
Significant Other |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active Markets for |
|
|
Observable |
|
|
Unobservable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identical Assets |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
Inputs |
|
Liabilities |
|
Total |
|
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
FFAs |
|
$ |
255,360 |
|
|
$ |
255,360 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Interest rate swap contracts |
|
|
2,419 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,419 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
257,779 |
|
|
$ |
255,360 |
|
|
$ |
2,419 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys FFAs are valued based on published quoted market prices. Navios Acquisition
Warrants are valued based on quoted market indices taking into consideration their restricted
nature. Investments in available for sale securities are valued based on published quoted market
prices. Interest rate swaps are valued using pricing models and the Company generally uses similar
models to value similar instruments. Where possible, the Company verifies the values produced by
its pricing models to market prices. Valuation models require a variety of inputs, including
contractual terms, market prices, yield curves, credit spreads, measures of volatility, and
correlations of such inputs. The Companys derivatives trade in liquid markets, and as such, model
inputs can generally be verified and do not involve significant management judgment. Such
instruments are typically classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
NOTE 14: EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
Retirement Saving Plan
The Company sponsors an employee saving plan covering all of its employees in the United
States. The Companys contributions to the employee saving plan during the year ended December 31,
2008, 2007 and 2006, were approximately $101, $103 and $197, respectively, which included a
discretionary contribution of $15, $16, and $98, respectively.
Defined Benefit Pension Plan
The Company sponsors a legacy unfunded defined benefit pension plan that covers certain
Bahamian and Uruguayan nationals and former Navios Corporation employees. The liability related to
the plan is recognized based on actuarial valuations. The current portion of the liability is
included in accrued expenses and the non-current portion of the liability is included in other long
term liabilities. There are no pension plan assets.
The Greek office employees are protected by the Greek Labor Law. According to the law, the
Company is required to pay retirement indemnities to employees on dismissal, or on leaving with an
entitlement to a full security retirement pension. The amount of the compensation is based on the
number of years of service and the amount of the monthly remuneration including regular bonuses at
the date of dismissal or retirement up to a maximum of two years salary. If the employees remain in
the employment of the Company until normal retirement age, the entitled retirement compensation is
equal to 40% of the compensation amount that would be payable if they were dismissed at that time.
The
F-46
number of employees that will remain with the Company until retirement age is not known. The
Company considers this plan equivalent to a lump sum defined benefit pension plan and accounts it
under FAS Statement No. 87 Employers Accounting for Pension.
Post-employment medical and life insurance benefits
The Company effective May 31, 2006, terminated its post retirement medical and life insurance
benefit programs for the five U.S. retirees that were eligible to those benefits prior to the
program elimination in December 2001. The Company paid $502 to terminate these programs. As a
result of this termination and the release of the respective accrued liabilities the Company
realized a gain of $295 during the year ended December 31, 2006.
Stock Plan
On October 18, 2007 and on December 16, 2008, the Compensation Committee of the Board of
Directors authorized the issuance of restricted stock and stock options in accordance with the
approved Companys stock plan for its employees, officers and directors. Stock-based awards granted
to Navios Holdings employees, officers and directors are based on service conditions only and
include restricted stock and stock options. Prior to this, the Company did not have a stock plan in
place under which it granted stock-based compensation to its employees.
Employees have been granted to a certain amount of shares which are restricted for a two year
period. This restriction lapses in two equal tranches over the requisite service periods of one and
two years from the grant date. Stock options have been granted to executives and directors only and
vest in three equal tranches over the requisite service periods of one, two and three years from
the grant date. Each option remains exercisable for 7 years after its vesting date.
The fair value of all stock option awards has been calculated based on the modified
Black-Scholes method. A description of the significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value
of the stock option awards is set out below:
|
- |
|
Expected term: The simplified method was used which includes
taking the average of the weighted average time to vesting and the
contractual term of the option award. The option awards vest over
three years at 33.3%, 33.3% and 33.4% respectively, resulting in a
weighted average time to vest of approximately 2 years. The
contractual term of the award is 7 years. Utilizing the simplified
approach formula, the derived expected term estimate for the Companys
option award is 4.5 years. |
|
|
- |
|
Expected volatility: The historical volatility of Navios Holdings
shares was used in order to estimate the volatility of the stock
option awards. The final expected volatility estimate (which equals
the historical estimate is 61.30% and 38.47% for 2008 and 2007,
respectively) |
|
|
- |
|
Expected dividends: The expected dividend is based on the current
dividend, our historical pattern of dividend increases and the market
price of our stock. |
|
|
- |
|
Risk-free rate: Navios Holdings has selected to employ the
risk-free yield-to-maturity rate to match the expected term estimated
under the simplified method. The 4.5 yield-to-maturity rate as of
the grant date is 1.23% and 4.123% for 2008 and 2007, respectively. |
The fair value of restricted stock grants excludes dividends to which holders of restricted
stock are not entitled. The expected dividend assumption used in the valuation of restricted stock
grant is $0.06 and $0.0666 per share for 2008 and 2007, respectively.
The weighted average grant date fair value of stock options and restricted stock granted
during the year ended December 31, 2008 was $1.21 and $3.18, respectively.
The weighted average grant date fair value of stock options and restricted stock granted
during the year ended December 31, 2007 was $5.35 and $16.75, respectively.
The effect of compensation expense arising from the stock-based arrangements described above
amounts to $2,694 and $566 as of December 31, 2008 and 2007,
respectively and it is reflected in general and administrative expenses on the income statement. The recognized compensation
expense for the year is presented as adjustment to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities on the statements of cash flows.
F-47
The summary of stock-based awards is summarized as follows (in thousands except per share
data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average |
|
|
average |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
exercise |
|
|
remaining |
|
|
intrinsic |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
price |
|
|
term |
|
|
value |
|
Options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at January 1, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Granted |
|
|
288,000 |
|
|
|
16.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited or expired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding as of December 31, 2007 |
|
|
288,000 |
|
|
|
16.75 |
|
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
|
1,542 |
|
Vested or expected to vest at December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at January 1, 2008 |
|
|
288,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,542 |
|
Granted |
|
|
571,266 |
|
|
|
3.18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
691 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited or expired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding as of December 31, 2008 |
|
|
859,266 |
|
|
|
7.73 |
|
|
|
8.57 |
|
|
|
2,233 |
|
Vested or expected to vest at December 31, 2008 |
|
|
96,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at December 31, 2008 |
|
|
96,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding as of January 1, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
147,264 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited or expired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non Vested as of December 31, 2007 |
|
|
147,264 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
2,467 |
|
Vested or expected to vest at December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding as of January 1, 2008 |
|
|
147,264 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,467 |
|
Granted |
|
|
314,016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,255 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(79,858 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,301 |
) |
Forfeited or expired |
|
|
(1,083 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non Vested as of December 31, 2008 |
|
|
380,339 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
2,403 |
|
The estimated compensation cost relating to non-vested stock option and restricted stock
awards not yet recognized was $1,704 and $1,670, respectively, as of December 31, 2008 and are
expected to be recognized over the weighted average period of 2.2 and 1.7 years, respectively.
The estimated compensation cost relating to non-vested stock option and restricted stock
awards not yet recognized was $1,352 and $2,093, respectively, as of December 31, 2007 and are
expected to be recognized over the weighted average period of 2.8 and 1.8 years, respectively.
F-48
NOTE 15: COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES:
The Company as of December 31, 2008 was contingently liable for letters of guarantee and
letters of credit amounting to $2,490 (2007: $1,738) issued by various banks in favor of various
organizations of which $1,534 ($2007: $668) are collateralized by cash deposits, which are included
as a component of restricted cash.
The Company has issued guarantees, amounting to $0 at December 31, 2008 (2007: $3,500) to
third parties where the Company irrevocably and unconditionally guarantees subsidiaries obligations
under dry bulk shipping FFAs. The guarantees remain in effect for a period of six months following
the last trade date.
On November 30, 2006, the Company received notification that one of our FFA trading
counterparties filed for bankruptcy in Canada. The exposure to such counterparty was estimated to
be approximately $7,658. While the recovery to be obtained in any liquidation proceeding can not be
estimated, based on managements expectations and assumptions the Company had provided for $5,361
in its 2006 financial statements and an additional $500 in its 2008 financial statements. No
further information has developed since then which would change managements expectations and
assumptions either to increase or decrease the provision. As of December 31, 2008, an amount of
$1,101 was recovered.
The Company is involved in various disputes and arbitration proceedings arising in the
ordinary course of business. Provisions have been recognized in the financial statements for all
such proceedings where the Company believes that a liability may be probable, and for which the
amounts are reasonably estimable, based upon facts known at the date the financial statements were
prepared. In the opinion of management, the ultimate disposition of these matters is immaterial and
will not adversely affect the Companys financial position, results of operations or liquidity.
Upon acquisition, the Companys subsidiaries in South America were contingently liable for
various claims and penalties towards the local tax authorities amounting to $6,632. The respective
provision for such contingencies is included in Other long term liabilities. According to the
acquisition agreement, if such cases are materialized against the Company, the amounts involved
will be reimbursed by the previous shareholders, and, as such, the Company has recognized a
respective receivable (included in Other long term assets) against such liability. The
contingencies are expected to be resolved in the next five years. In the opinion of management, the
ultimate disposition of these matters is immaterial and will not adversely affect the Companys
financial position, results of operations or liquidity.
The Company, in the normal course of business, entered into contracts to time charter-in
vessels for various periods through April 2021.
NOTE 16: LEASES
Charters-in:
As of December 31, 2008, the Company had 28 chartered-in vessels (8 Ultra Handymax, 11 Panamax
and 9 Capesize vessels). The Company has options to purchase 12 of them.
The future minimum commitments, net of commissions under charters in are as follows
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount |
|
2009 |
|
$ |
107,560 |
|
2010 |
|
|
112,751 |
|
2011 |
|
|
91,970 |
|
2012 |
|
|
99,587 |
|
2013 |
|
|
92,643 |
|
2014 and thereafter |
|
|
377,337 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
881,848 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-49
Charter hire expense for chartered-in vessels amounted to $897,062, $402,515 and $59,774, for
the each of the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
In November 2008, Navios Holdings cancelled the agreements to charter-in the following vessels at no cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vessel |
|
Vessel Type |
|
Delivery Date |
|
Deadweight |
|
Purchase Option(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in metric tons) |
|
|
|
|
Navios TBN |
|
Kamsarmax |
|
|
08/2010 |
|
|
|
81,000 |
|
|
Yes |
Navios TBN |
|
Kamsarmax |
|
|
09/2010 |
|
|
|
81,000 |
|
|
Yes |
Navios TBN |
|
Kamsarmax |
|
|
11/2010 |
|
|
|
81,000 |
|
|
Yes |
Navios TBN |
|
Handysize |
|
|
01/2011 |
|
|
|
35,000 |
|
|
Yes |
Navios TBN |
|
Kamsarmax |
|
|
01/2011 |
|
|
|
81,000 |
|
|
Yes |
Navios TBN |
|
Kamsarmax |
|
|
02/2011 |
|
|
|
81,000 |
|
|
Yes |
Navios TBN |
|
Kamsarmax |
|
|
03/2011 |
|
|
|
81,000 |
|
|
Yes |
Navios TBN |
|
Handysize |
|
|
05/2011 |
|
|
|
35,000 |
|
|
Yes |
Navios TBN |
|
Handysize |
|
|
06/2011 |
|
|
|
35,000 |
|
|
Yes |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The initial 50% purchase option on each vessel was held by Navios Holdings. |
Charters-out:
The future minimum revenue, net of commissions, expected to be earned on non-cancelable time
charters is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount |
|
2009 |
|
$ |
243,417 |
|
2010 |
|
|
275,241 |
|
2011 |
|
|
236,503 |
|
2012 |
|
|
207,654 |
|
2013 |
|
|
163,801 |
|
2014 and thereafter |
|
|
389,198 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,515,814 |
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from time charter are not generally received when a vessel is off-hire, including
time required for scheduled maintenance of the vessel. In arriving at the minimum future charter
revenues, an estimated time off-hire to perform scheduled maintenance on each vessel has been
deducted, although there is no assurance that such estimate will be reflective of the actual
off-hire in the future.
Office space:
The future minimum commitments under lease obligations for office space are as follows
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount |
|
2009 |
|
$ |
1,604 |
|
2010 |
|
|
1,343 |
|
2011 |
|
|
1,288 |
|
2012 |
|
|
1,219 |
|
2013 |
|
|
1,201 |
|
2014 and thereafter |
|
|
5,943 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total minimum lease payments (*) |
|
$ |
12,598 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*) |
|
Minimum payments have not been reduced by minimum
sublease rentals of a total amount of $289 due
until the end of the sublease agreement, under a
non cancelable sublease. |
F-50
Rent expense for office space amounted to $1,860, $1,213, and $1,038 for each of the years
ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
On January 2, 2006 the Company relocated its headquarters to new leased premises in Piraeus,
Greece, under an eleven-year lease expiring in 2017. In 2001, the Company entered into a ten-year
lease for office facilities in Norwalk USA, that expires in May 2011. On October 30, 2006, the
Company concluded an agreement with a third party to sublease approximately 2,000 square feet of
its office premises in South Norwalk, Connecticut, with the same termination date of the prime
lease. On October 31, 2007, the Company entered into a twelve-year lease agreement for additional
space of its offices in Piraeus. See Notes 3 and 17 for further information on the office
relocation and the new lease. Kleimar entered in a lease agreement for office facilities in
Antwerp, Belgium, that expires in June 2009. Navios Logistics subsidiaries lease various premises
in Argentina and Paraguay that expire in various dates until 2013. The above table incorporates the
lease commitment on all offices as disclosed above.
NOTE 17: TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PARTIES
Office rent: On January 2, 2006, Navios Corporation and Navios ShipManagement Inc., two
wholly owned subsidiaries of Navios Holdings, entered into two lease agreements with Goldland
Ktimatiki-Ikodomiki-Touristiki and Xenodohiaki Anonimos Eteria, a Greek corporation which is
partially owned by relatives of Angeliki Frangou, Navios Holdings Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer. The lease agreements provide for the leasing of two facilities located in Piraeus, Greece,
of approximately 2,034.3 square meters and houses the operations of most of the Companys
subsidiaries. The total annual lease payments are EUR 420 (approximately $650) and the lease
agreements expire in 2017. The Company believes the terms and provisions of the lease agreements
were the same as those that would have been agreed with a non-related third party. These payments
are subject to annual adjustments starting from the third year which are based on the inflation
rate prevailing in Greece as reported by the Greek State at the end of each year.
On October 31, 2007 Navios ShipManagement Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Navios Holdings,
entered into a lease agreement with Emerald Ktimatiki-Ikodomiki-Touristiki and Xenodohiaki Anonimos
Eteria, a Greek corporation that is partially owned by relatives of Angeliki Frangou, Navios
Holdings Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. The lease agreement provides for the leasing of one
facility in Piraeus, Greece, of approximately 1,367.5 square meters and houses part of the
operations of the Company. The total annual lease payments are EUR 420 (approximately $650) and the
lease agreement expires in 2019. These payments are subject to annual adjustments starting from the
third year which are based on the inflation rate prevailing in Greece as reported by the Greek
State at the end of each year.
Purchase of services: The Company utilizes Acropolis Chartering and Shipping Inc.
(Acropolis) as a broker. Commissions paid to Acropolis for each of the years ended December 31,
2008, 2007 and 2006 were $1,746, $362 and $187, respectively. The Company owns fifty percent of the
common stock of Acropolis. During the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, the Company
received dividends of $1,928 and $678, and $583 respectively.
Management fees: Pursuant to a management agreement dated November 16, 2007, Navios
Holdings provides commercial and technical management services to Navios Partners vessels for a
daily fee of $4,000 per owned Panamax vessel and $5,000 per owned Capesize vessel. This daily fee
covers all of the vessels operating expenses, including the cost of drydock and special surveys.
The daily rates are fixed for a period of two years whereas the initial term of the agreement is
five years commencing from November 16, 2007. Total management fees for the years ended December
31, 2008 and 2007 amounted to $9,275 and $920, respectively.
General & administrative expenses: Pursuant to the administrative services agreement
dated
November 16, 2007, Navios Holdings provides administrative services to Navios Partners which
include: bookkeeping, audit and accounting services, legal and insurance services, administrative
and clerical services, banking and financial services, advisory services, client and investor
relations and other. Navios Holdings is reimbursed for reasonable costs and expenses incurred in
connection with the provision of these services. Total general and administrative fees charged for the years ended
December 31, 2008 and 2007 amounted to $1,490 and $161, respectively.
F-51
Balances due to related parties: Included in the trade accounts payable at December 31,
2008 and 2007 is an amount of $185 and $370, respectively, which is due to Acropolis Chartering and
Shipping Inc.
Balance due from affiliate: Due from affiliate as at December 31, 2008 amounts to $1,677
(2007: $4,458) which includes the current amounts of $1,541 due from Navios Partners (2007:
$4,458). The balance mainly consists of management fees, administrative fees and other expenses.
The balance of 2007 relates to the IPO expenses paid on behalf of Navios Partners amounting to
$3,816, as well as management fees, administrative service fees and other expenses amounting to
$642. (For details relating to Navios Partners IPO see Note 10.)
Sale of Navios Aurora I: On July 1, 2008, Navios Aurora I was sold to Navios Partners.
The
sale price consisted of $35,000 in cash and $44,936 in common units (3,131,415 common units) of
Navios Partners. The investment in the 3,131,415 common units is classified as Investments in
available for sale securities. The gain from the sale of Navios Aurora I was $51,508 of which
$24,940 was recognized at the time of sale in the statements of income under Gain on sale of
assets. The remaining $26,568 which represents profit to the extent of Navios Holdings ownership
interest in Navios Partners had been deferred under Long term liabilities and deferred income and
amortized over the remaining life of the vessel or until its sold. At December 31, 2008, the total
unamortized portion of the gain was $25,692. (See Note 8).
Navios Acquisition: On July 1, 2008, Navios Holdings purchased 7,600,000 warrants from
Navios
Acquisition for a total consideration of $7,600 ($1.00 per warrant) in the private placement that
occurred simultaneously with the completion of its IPO. Each Sponsor Warrant will entitle the
holder to purchase from Navios Acquisition one share of common stock at an exercise price of
$7.00. Prior to the IPO, Navios Holdings had purchased 8,625,000 Sponsor Units for a total
consideration of $25, of which an aggregate of 290,000 units were transferred to the Companys
officers and directors and an aggregate of 2,300,000 Sponsor Units were returned to Navios
Acquisition and cancelled upon receipt. Each unit consists of one share of Navios Acquisitions
common stock and one Sponsor Warrant. (See Note 1).
On March 31, 2008, Navios Holdings provided a non-interest bearing loan of $500 to Navios
Acquisition which was repaid during 2008.
Navios Acquisition presently occupies office space provided by Navios Holdings. Navios
Holdings has agreed that, until the consummation of a business combination, it will make such
office space available for use by Navios Acquisition, as well as certain office and secretarial
services, as may be required from time to time. Navios Acquisition has agreed to pay Navios
Holdings $10 per month for such services and the charge is included in general and administrative
expenses. Total general and administrative fees charged for the year ended December 31, 2008
amounted to $60 (2007: $0). As of December 31, 2008, the balance due from Navios Acquisition was
$136.
NOTE 18: COMMON STOCK
In order to raise capital for its expansion plans in South America, Navios Holdings induced
certain warrant holders (Qualified Institutional Buyers and Institutional Accredited Investors QIBAIs) to early exercise their warrants by lowering the exercise price from $5.00 to $4.10 per
share, provided that the warrants must be exercised immediately upon execution of the new warrant
exercise agreement. This reduced exercise price transaction was only offered privately to QIBAIs
which were among the top fifteen warrant holders and had no direct relationship with Navios
Holdings, with the exception of Ms. Angeliki Frangou, Navios Holdings chairman and CEO, who
exercised all of her 6,666,280 warrants in order to demonstrate her commitment to the transaction
and proposed capital expansion program. Total warrants affected by this inducement program were
15,978,280 out of 65,550,000 outstanding warrants which were exercised on June 6, 2006, resulting
in total proceeds of approximately $65,500 and issuance of 15,978,280 unregistered common shares.
The reduction of the warrant exercise price from $5.00 to $4.10 per share did not have any
accounting consequence since the fair value of the modified warrant was less than the fair value of
the original warrant immediately
prior to the modification.
F-52
On August 10, 2006, Navios Holdings issued 708,993 additional shares to its financial advisors
for services rendered in connection with the capital raised from the re-pricing of warrants. These
services were valued using the market value of the aforementioned shares as of the date the
transactions was completed, without any subsequent measurement being necessary.
Pursuant to a registration rights agreement, Navios Holdings filed a Form F-3/A with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on September 8, 2006 (No. 333-136936), registering the resale of
the common stock related to the exercise of the warrants and the common stock issued to its
financial advisors (with the exception of Ms. Angeliki Frangous shares which will remain
unregistered) and had such registration statement declared effective on September 13, 2006.
Giving effect to this the warrant exercise transaction stated above, the additional 708,993
shares issued to the Companys financial advisors and the 1,161,535 shares issued in connection
with the acquisition of vessel Navios Gemini S, Navios Holdings had 62,088,127 shares outstanding
and 49,571,720 warrants outstanding as of December 31, 2006, which will expire in accordance with
their terms on December 9, 2008.
On December 28, 2006, Navios Holdings made an offer to the holders of its 49,571,720
outstanding warrants to acquire shares of common stock by either (a) exercising warrants for
1.16 shares in consideration of $5.00 or (b) receiving one share in exchange of every 5.25 warrants
surrendered. Under this offer, which expired on January 26, 2007, 32,140,128 warrants were
exercised, of which 14,237,557 were exercised by payment of the $5.00 exercise price and 17,902,571
were exercised by exchange of warrants. As a result, $71,200 of gross cash proceeds were raised
($66,600 net of costs incurred) and 19,925,527 new shares of common stock were issued.
On January 10, 2007, Navios Holdings filed with the SEC an amendment to its Articles of
Incorporation to effectuate the increase of its authorized common stock from 120,000,000 shares to
250,000,000 shares.
On May 30, 2007, the Company issued 13,225,000 shares of common stock following the offering
of 11,500,000 shares of common stock, with the option of the underwriters to purchase 1,725,000
additional shares of common stock to cover any over-allotments. The net cash proceeds from the
above share capital issuance were $124,851.
On October 18, 2007, pursuant to the stock option plan approved by the Board of Directors
Navios Holdings issued 147,264 restricted shares of common stock to its employees.
On December 10, 2007, Navios Holdings issued 1,397,624 shares of common stock in exchange for
the right to purchase two new Capesize vessels (Note 8).
During the year ended December 31, 2007, the Company issued 9,628,887 shares of common stock,
following various exercises of warrants. The proceeds from such warrants exercise amounted to
$48,144.
On January 2 and January 23, 2008 Navios Holdings issued 10,000 and 3,534, restricted
shares of common stock respectively, to its employees. Until December 31, 2008, 1,083 restricted
shares of common stock were forfeited upon termination of employment and 3,266 restricted shares
were surrendered.
On January 23, 2008, the Company issued 25,310 restricted stock units to its employees.
At the time each underlying unit vests, the Company will issue common shares to these employees.
The restricted stock units do not have any voting or dividend rights until issuance of the
respective shares.
During the year ended December 31, 2008, Navios Holdings issued 1,351,368 shares of
common stock, following the exercise of warrants generating proceeds of $6,757. The remaining
6,451,337 non exercised warrants were expired and cancelled on December 9, 2008 in accordance with
their terms.
On February 14, 2008, the Board of Directors approved a share repurchase program for up
to $50,000 of the Navios Holdings common stock. Share repurchases are made pursuant to a program
adopted under Rule 10b5-1 under the Securities Exchange Act. The
program does not require any minimum purchase or any specific number or amount of shares and may be suspended or reinstated at
any time in Navios Holdings discretion and without notice. Repurchases are subject to restrictions
under our credit facilities and indenture. On October 20, 2008, Navios Holdings concluded its share
repurchase program and 6,959,290 shares were repurchased under this program, for a total
consideration of $50,000.
F-53
In November 2008, the Board of Directors approved a share repurchase program for up to $25,000
of the Navios Holdings common stock. Share repurchases are made pursuant to a program adopted
under Rule 10b5-1 under the Securities Exchange Act. The program does not require any minimum
purchase or any specific number or amount of shares and may be suspended or reinstated at any time
in Navios Holdings discretion and without notice. Repurchases are subject to restrictions under
the terms of our credit facilities and indenture. As at December 31, 2008, 575,580 shares were
repurchased under this program, for a total consideration of $1,033.
On December 16, 2008, pursuant to the stock option plan approved by the Board of Directors
Navios Holdings issued 250,672 restricted shares of common stock to its employees.
Following the issuances and cancellations of the shares, described above, Navios Holdings
has, as of December 31, 2008, 100,488,784 shares of common stock outstanding.
NOTE 19: DISPOSAL OF ASSETS
The Company disposed the following assets in 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Navios Aurora I |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash consideration received |
|
$ |
35,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Shares consideration received |
|
|
44,936 |
|
|
|
|
|
Book value of vessel Aurora sold to Navios Partners |
|
|
(28,428 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total gain |
|
|
51,508 |
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred gain (see Note 8) |
|
|
(26,568 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain recognized on sale of Navios Aurora I |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
24,940 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obeliks |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash consideration received |
|
|
35,090 |
|
|
|
|
|
Book value of vessel Obeliks sold |
|
|
(34,915 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain recognized on sale of Obeliks |
|
|
|
|
|
|
175 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partial sale of subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sale price |
|
|
78,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Book value of CNSA contributed to Navios Logistics |
|
|
(70,150 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Excess of fair value sale (including minority interests) |
|
|
7,850 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of partial subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,702 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of assets/partial sale of subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
27,817 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Following the IPO of Navios Partners in November 2007 (see Note 10), the following assets were
disposed of in 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
Assets sold to Navios Partners |
|
|
|
|
Cash proceeds on sale of assets to Navios Partners |
|
$ |
353,300 |
|
Net book value of assets sold |
|
|
(185,789 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of assets |
|
$ |
167,511 |
|
|
|
|
|
No assets were disposed of in 2006.
F-54
NOTE 20: SEGMENT INFORMATION
The Company has two reportable segments from which it derives its revenues: Vessel
Operations and Logistic Business. Starting in 2008 following the acquisition of Horamar and the
formation of Navios Logistics, the Company renamed its Port Terminal Segment to Logistics Business
Segment, to include the activities of Horamar which provides similar products and services in the
region that Navios existing port facility currently operates. The reportable segments reflect the
internal organization of the Company and are strategic businesses that offer different products and
services. The Vessel Operations business consists of transportation and handling of bulk cargoes
through ownership, operation, and trading of vessels, freight, and forward freight agreements. The
Logistics Business consists of operating ports and transfer station terminals, handling of vessels,
barges and push boats as well as upriver transport facilities in the Hidrovia region.
The Company measures segment performance based on net income. Inter-segment sales and
transfers are not significant and have been eliminated and are not included in the following
tables. Summarized financial information concerning each of the Companys reportable segments is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vessel Operations |
|
|
Logistics Business |
|
|
|
|
|
|
for the |
|
|
for the |
|
|
Total for the |
|
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
1,138,284 |
|
|
$ |
107,778 |
|
|
$ |
1,246,062 |
|
Gain on forward freight agreements |
|
|
16,244 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,244 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
7,252 |
|
|
|
501 |
|
|
|
7,753 |
|
Interest income from investments in finance leases |
|
|
2,185 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,185 |
|
Interest expense and finance cost |
|
|
(44,707 |
) |
|
|
(4,421 |
) |
|
|
(49,128 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(38,499 |
) |
|
|
(18,563 |
) |
|
|
(57,062 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in net income of affiliated companies and
joint ventures |
|
|
17,431 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,431 |
|
Net income |
|
|
115,100 |
|
|
|
3,427 |
|
|
|
118,527 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
|
1,783,132 |
|
|
|
472,246 |
|
|
|
2,255,3787 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
56,239 |
|
|
|
91,393 |
|
|
|
147,632 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
318,287 |
|
|
|
99,212 |
|
|
|
417,499 |
|
Investment in affiliates |
|
$ |
5,605 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
5,605 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Port Terminal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vessel Operations |
|
|
Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
for the |
|
|
for the |
|
|
Total for the |
|
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
748,731 |
|
|
$ |
9,689 |
|
|
$ |
758,420 |
|
Gain on forward freight agreements |
|
|
26,379 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,379 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
10,671 |
|
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
10,819 |
|
Interest income from investments in finance leases |
|
|
3,507 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,507 |
|
F-55
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Port Terminal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vessel Operations |
|
|
Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
for the |
|
|
for the |
|
|
Total for the |
|
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Interest expense and finance cost |
|
|
(51,089 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(51,089 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(30,033 |
) |
|
|
(1,867 |
) |
|
|
(31,900 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in net income of affiliated companies and
joint ventures |
|
|
1,929 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,929 |
|
Net income |
|
|
268,038 |
|
|
|
2,963 |
|
|
|
271,001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
|
1,894,296 |
|
|
|
76,708 |
|
|
|
1,971,004 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
56,239 |
|
|
|
14,571 |
|
|
|
70,810 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
253,364 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
253,364 |
|
Investment in affiliates |
|
$ |
1,079 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,079 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Port Terminal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vessel Operations |
|
|
Operations for |
|
|
Total for the |
|
|
|
for the Year Ended |
|
|
the Year Ended |
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
196,646 |
|
|
$ |
8,729 |
|
|
$ |
205,375 |
|
Gain on forward freight agreements |
|
|
19,786 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,786 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
3,821 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
3,832 |
|
Interest expense and finance cost |
|
|
(47,429 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(47,429 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(35,242 |
) |
|
|
(1,887 |
) |
|
|
(37,129 |
) |
Equity in net income of affiliated companies |
|
|
674 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
674 |
|
Net income |
|
|
18,236 |
|
|
|
2,833 |
|
|
|
21,069 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
|
871,860 |
|
|
|
72,923 |
|
|
|
944,783 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
26,218 |
|
|
|
14,571 |
|
|
|
40,789 |
|
Capital expenditures (*) |
|
|
161,341 |
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
161,445 |
|
Investment in affiliates |
|
$ |
749 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
749 |
|
|
|
|
(*) |
|
Includes $5,100 non-cash consideration in the form of common stock issued in connection with the purchase of one vessel and $38,600 transferred from vessels
favorable lease terms and backlogs in connection with the acquisition of five option vessels. |
The following table sets out operating revenue by geographic region for the Companys
reportable segments. Vessel Operation and Logistics Business revenue is allocated on the basis of
the geographic region in which the customer is located. Dry bulk vessels operate worldwide.
Revenues from specific geographic region which contribute over 10% of total revenue are disclosed
separately.
Revenue by Geographic Region
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended |
|
|
Year ended |
|
|
Year ended |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
North America |
|
$ |
84,543 |
|
|
$ |
92,474 |
|
|
$ |
19,354 |
|
Europe |
|
|
400,867 |
|
|
|
280,187 |
|
|
|
90,427 |
|
Asia |
|
|
600,286 |
|
|
|
323,352 |
|
|
|
73,666 |
|
South America |
|
|
107,778 |
|
|
|
9,689 |
|
|
|
8,729 |
|
Other |
|
|
52,588 |
|
|
|
52,718 |
|
|
|
13,199 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,246,062 |
|
|
$ |
758,420 |
|
|
$ |
205,375 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following describes long-lived assets by country for the Companys reportable segments.
Vessels operate on a worldwide basis and are not restricted to specific locations. Accordingly, it
is not possible to allocate the assets of these operations to specific countries. The total net
book value of long-lived assets for vessels amounted to $484,265 and $399,129 at December 31, 2008
and 2007, respectively. For Logistics Business, all long-lived assets are located in South America.
The total net book value of long-lived assets for the Logistics business amounted to $247,783 and $24,949 at
December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
F-56
NOTE 21: EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
Earnings per share are calculated by dividing net income by the average number of shares of
Navios Holdings outstanding during the period. Net income for the year ended December 31, 2007 is
adjusted for the purposes of earnings per share calculation, to reflect the inducement of the
exercise of warrants discussed in Note 19. The inducement resulted to the adjustment in the income
available to common stockholders, for the earnings per share calculation, by $4,195, which
represents the incremental value that was given to the warrant holders in order to exercise their
warrants. Fully diluted earnings per share assumes the 6,759,586, 15,426,857 and 56,444,569
weighted average number of warrants outstanding for each of the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007
and 2006, respectively were exercised at the warrant price of $5.00 generating proceeds of 33,797,
$77,134 and $282,222 respectively and proceed was used to buy back shares of common stock at the
average market price during the respective period. The remaining 6,451,337 warrants not exercised
expired on December 9, 2008, at 05:00 p.m., New York City time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended |
|
|
Year ended |
|
|
Year ended |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
118,527 |
|
|
$ |
271,001 |
|
|
$ |
21,069 |
|
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incremental fair value of securities offered to
induce warrants exercise |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,195 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income available to common shareholders |
|
$ |
118,527 |
|
|
$ |
266,806 |
|
|
$ |
21,069 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for basic earning per share weighted
average shares |
|
|
104,343,083 |
|
|
|
92,820,943 |
|
|
|
54,894,402 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilutive potential common shares weighted average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock and restricted units |
|
|
178,691 |
|
|
|
29,613 |
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants outstanding weighted average |
|
|
6,759,586 |
|
|
|
15,426,857 |
|
|
|
56,444,569 |
|
Proceeds on exercises of warrants |
|
$ |
33,797,930 |
|
|
$ |
77,134,285 |
|
|
$ |
282,222,845 |
|
Number of shares to be repurchased |
|
|
3,936,612 |
|
|
|
8,847,880 |
|
|
|
55,809,283 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilutive effect of securities warrants |
|
|
3,001,665 |
|
|
|
6,608,590 |
|
|
|
635,286 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for diluted earnings per share -
adjusted weighted shares and assumed conversions |
|
|
107,344,748 |
|
|
|
99,429,533 |
|
|
|
55,529,688 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share |
|
$ |
1.14 |
|
|
$ |
2.87 |
|
|
$ |
0.38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
$ |
1.10 |
|
|
$ |
2.68 |
|
|
$ |
0.38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The denominator of diluted earnings per share excludes the weighted average stock options
outstanding since the effect is anti-dilutive.
NOTE 22: INCOME TAXES
Marshall Islands, Greece, Liberia, Panama and Malta, do not impose a tax on international
shipping income. Under the laws of Marshall Islands, Greece, Liberia and Panama the countries of
the companies incorporation and vessels registration, the companies are subject to registration
and tonnage taxes which have been included in vessel operating expenses in the accompanying
consolidated statements of operations.
F-57
Certain of the Companys subsidiaries are registered as Law 89 companies in Greece. These Law
89 companies are exempt from Greek income tax on their income derived from certain activities
related to shipping. Since all the Law 89 companies conduct only business activities that qualify
for the exemption of Greek income tax, no provision has been made for Greek income tax with respect
to income derived by these Law 89 companies from their business operations in Greece.
Pursuant to Section 883 of the Internal Revenue Code of the United States (the Code), U.S.
source income from the international operation of ships is generally exempt from U.S. income tax if
the company operating the ships meets certain incorporation and ownership requirements. Among other
things, in order to qualify for this exemption, the company operating the ships must be
incorporated in a country, which grants an equivalent exemption from income taxes to U.S.
corporations. All the companys ship-operating subsidiaries satisfy these initial criteria. In
addition, these companies must be more than 50% owned by individuals who are residents, as defined,
in the countries of incorporation or another foreign country that grants an equivalent exemption to
U.S. corporations. Subject to proposed regulations becoming finalized in their current form, the
management of the Company believes by virtue of a special rule applicable to situations where the
ship operating companies are beneficially owned by a publicly traded company like the Company, the
second criterion can also be satisfied based on the trading volume and ownership of the Companys
shares, but no assurance can be given that this will remain so in the future.
In Belgium profit from ocean shipping is taxable based on the tonnage of the sea-going vessels
from which the profit is obtained (tonnage tax) or taxation is based on the regular income tax
rate of 33.99% applying the special optional system of depreciations of new or second hand vessels.
The Company qualifies for the second method of taxation. Following the acquisition by a Belgian
taxpayer, sea-going vessels and shares in such new vessels receive tax allowances as follows:
|
|
|
for the financial year of putting into service: maximum depreciation 20% straight line; |
|
|
|
|
for each of the two following financial years: maximum depreciation of 15% straight line; |
|
|
|
|
then per financial year up to the complete writing off: maximum depreciation of 10% straight line. |
In 2007, the Companys Belgian subsidiary, Kleimar, has applied for changing its method of
taxation, to tonnage tax. The Company was granted the ruling of the local authorities, which, is
effective for the fiscal year starting January 1, 2008.
In 2008, Kleimar received the official decision from the Belgian tax authorities that assuming
it met certain quantitative thresholds, it had been declared eligible for the tonnage tax regime
(instead of an income tax regime) with an effective date January 1, 2008. Accordingly, all of
Kleimars existing deferred tax balances that were affected by this decision, were released in 2008
with a corresponding impact reflected in the income statement amounting to $57,249.
Kleimar has fixed the minimum depreciation on the vessels up to 4% straight line. Kleimar can
defer depreciation allowances to future years except that under no circumstances can the annual
allowance exceed 20% of the purchase of the investment value. Furthermore, Kleimar as a Belgian
company can benefit from an investment allowance that is equal to 30% of the purchase price of the
new or second-hand sea-going vessel that are owned for the first time by a Belgian taxpayer. In
case of shortage of taxable income from which the investment allowance is deducted, the remaining
allowance is carried forward to be deducted from future taxable income without limitation in time.
Total impact of investment allowance on the taxable income for the period from February 2,
2007 to December 31, 2007 can be summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
2007 |
Total investment allowance |
|
|
82,287 |
|
Total deducted from taxable income |
|
|
(4,242 |
) |
Total allowance carried forward to offset against future taxable income |
|
|
78,045 |
|
F-58
The difference between the Companys income tax expense for the year ended December 31, 2007
and tax expense calculated at the statutory tax rate of 0% applicable to Marshall Islands, where
the Company is domiciled, is due to taxable income of $13,091 earned by Kleimar which was taxed at
a statutory rate of 33.99% when the Company was under the previous tax regime.
The tax expense reflected in the Companys consolidated financial statements for the year
ended December 31, 2008 is attributable to its subsidiaries in South America, which are subject to
the Argentinean and Paraguayan income tax regime.
CNSA is located in a tax free zone and is not liable to income or other tax. Operations of all
Uruguayan companies are not liable to income tax.
Relating to the Argentinean companies, income tax liabilities for the current and prior
periods are measured at the amount expected to be paid to the taxation authorities, using a tax
rate of 35% on the taxable net income. Tax rates and tax laws used to assess the income tax
liability are those that are effective on the close of the fiscal period. Additionally, at the end
the fiscal year, companies in Argentina have to calculate an assets tax (Impuesto a la Ganancia
Minima Presunta or Alternative Minimum Tax). This tax is supplementary to income tax. The tax is
calculated by applying the effective tax rate of 1% over the gross value of the corporate assets
(based on tax law criteria). The subsidiaries tax liabilities will be the higher of income tax or
Alternative Minimum Tax. However, if the Alternative Minimum Tax exceeds income tax during any
fiscal year, such excess may be computed as a prepayment of any income tax excess over the
Alternative Minimum Tax that may arise in the next ten fiscal years.
Under the tax laws of Argentina, the subsidiaries of the Company in that country are subject
to taxes levied on gross revenues. Rates differ depending on the jurisdiction where revenues are
earned for tax purposes. Average rates were approximately 3% for the year ended December 31, 2008.
Relating to the Paraguayan subsidiaries, there are two possible options to determine the
income tax liability. In the first option income tax liabilities for the current and prior periods
are measured at the amount expected to be paid to the taxation authorities, using the tax rate of
10% on the fiscal profit and loss. 50% of revenues derived from international freights are
considered Paraguayan sourced (and therefore taxed) if carried between Paraguay and Argentina,
Bolivia, Brazil or Uruguay, In any other case, only 30% of revenues derived from international
freights are considered Paraguayan sourced. Companies whose operations are considered international
freights can choose to pay income taxes on their revenues at an effective tax rate of 1% on such
revenues, without considering any other kind of adjustments. Fiscal losses, if any, are neither
deducted nor carried forward.
The Companys deferred taxes as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, relate primarily to deferred
tax liabilities on acquired intangible assets recognized in connection with the Horamar and Kleimar
acquisition, respectively, as discussed further in Note 3.
As
at January 1, 2007, the Company adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes. Interpretation No. 48 requires application of a more
likely than not threshold to the recognition and derecognition of uncertain tax positions.
Interpretation No. 48 permits the Company to recognize the amount of tax benefit that has a greater
that 50 percent likelihood of being ultimately realized upon settlement. It further requires that a
change in judgment related to the expected ultimate resolution of uncertain tax positions be
recognized in earnings in the quarter of such change. Kleimars open tax years are 2006 and 2007.
In relation to these open tax years, the Company believes that there are no material uncertain tax
positions. Relating to Argentinean and Paraguayan companies they have open tax years ranging from
2004 and onwards.
NOTE 23: MINORITY INTEREST
Following the acquisition of Horamar in January 2008, Navios Holdings owns 65.5% (excluding
504 shares still kept in escrow at December 31, 2008, pending the achievement of final EBITDA
target) of the outstanding common stock of Navios Logistics. The table below reflects the movement
in minority interest for the year ended December 31, 2008:
F-59
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interest December 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
|
|
Acquisition of Horamar |
|
|
96,186 |
|
Minority interest in subsidiaries of Horamar |
|
|
31,050 |
|
Profit and loss for the period |
|
|
1,723 |
|
Minority interest December 31, 2008 |
|
|
128,959 |
|
NOTE 24: INVESTMENT IN AVAILABLE FOR SALE SECURITIES
As part of the consideration received from the sale of Navios Aurora I to Navios Partners in
July 2008, the Company received 3,131,415 common units of Navios Partners (14.4% of the outstanding
units of Navios Partners), which are accounted for under FAS 115 as available-for-sale securities
(the AFS Securities). Accordingly, unrealized gains and losses on these securities are reflected
directly in equity unless an unrealized loss is considered other-than-temporary, in which case it
is transferred directly to the statement of income. The Company has no other types of available for
sale securities.
As of December 31, 2008 and 2007, the carrying amounts of the AFS Securities were $22,358 and
$0, respectively and the unrealized holding losses related to these AFS Securities included in
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income/ (Loss) were $22,578 and $0, respectively for the years
ended December 31, 2008 and 2007. No realized gains/losses were recognized in earnings and no AFS
Securities were sold for any of the periods presented.
Management evaluates securities for OTTI on a quarterly basis. Consideration is given to (1)
the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, (2) the
financial condition and near-term prospects of the investee, and (3) the intent and ability of the
Company to retain its investment in the investee for a period of time sufficient to allow for any
anticipated recovery in fair value. At December 31, 2008, the market value of the AFS securities
has declined by approximately 50% from the Companys cost basis and such securities have been in a
loss position since acquisition date in July 2008 (less than 6 months).
In analyzing an investees financial condition, management considers industry analysts
reports, financial performance of the investee, expected dividend yield, projected target prices of
investment analysts and managements ability and intent to hold the securities until recovery.
Based on all of these, the relatively short length of time of the impairment of the AFS Securities,
and managements ability and intent to hold the securities until recovery, management considers the
decline in market valuation to be temporary.
NOTE 25: OTHER FINANCIAL INFORMATION
The Companys 91/2% Senior Notes are fully
and unconditionally guaranteed on a joint and several
basis by all of the Companys subsidiaries with the exception of Navios Logistics (non- guarantor
subsidiary), Corporación Navios Sociedad Anonima for the periods prior to the formation of Navios
Logistics and designated as unrestricted subsidiaries or those not required by the Indenture.
Provided below are the condensed income statements and cash flow statements for the years ended
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 and balance sheets as of December 31, 2008 and 2007 of Navios
Maritime Holdings Inc., the guarantor subsidiaries and the non-guarantor subsidiaries. All
subsidiaries, except for the non-guarantor subsidiaries, are 100% owned. These condensed
consolidating statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP, except that all
subsidiaries have been accounted for on an equity basis.
F-60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Navios |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maritime |
|
Other |
|
Non |
|
|
|
|
Income Statement for the year |
|
Holdings Inc. |
|
Guarantor |
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
ended December 31, 2008 (in 000s US$) |
|
Issuer |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Eliminations |
|
Total |
Revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,138,284 |
|
|
|
107,778 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,246,062 |
|
Gain on forward freight agreements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,244 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,244 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Time charter, voyage and logistic
business expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(995,971 |
) |
|
|
(70,268 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,066,239 |
) |
Direct vessel expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26,621 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26,621 |
) |
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
(8,851 |
) |
|
|
(20,151 |
) |
|
|
(10,999 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(40,001 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(2,818 |
) |
|
|
(35,682 |
) |
|
|
(18,562 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(57,062 |
) |
Provision for losses on accounts
receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,668 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,668 |
) |
Interest income from finance leases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,185 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,185 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
4,073 |
|
|
|
3,178 |
|
|
|
502 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,753 |
|
Interest expenses and finance cost, net |
|
|
(23,335 |
) |
|
|
(21,372 |
) |
|
|
(4,421 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(49,128 |
) |
Gain on sale of assets/partial sale of
subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,817 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,817 |
|
Other income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
948 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
948 |
|
Other expense |
|
|
(5,218 |
) |
|
|
(7,340 |
) |
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,584 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before equity in net earnings
of affiliated companies |
|
|
(36,149 |
) |
|
|
77,903 |
|
|
|
4,952 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,706 |
|
Income from subsidiaries |
|
|
139,455 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(139,455 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in net earnings of affiliated
companies |
|
|
15,221 |
|
|
|
2,210 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,431 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before taxes and minority
interest |
|
|
118,527 |
|
|
|
80,113 |
|
|
|
4,952 |
|
|
|
(139,455 |
) |
|
|
64,137 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
57,094 |
|
|
|
(981 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
56,113 |
|
Income
before minority interest |
|
|
118,527 |
|
|
|
137,207 |
|
|
|
3,971 |
|
|
|
(139,455 |
) |
|
|
120,250 |
|
Minority interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,179 |
) |
|
|
(544 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,723 |
) |
Net Income |
|
|
118,527 |
|
|
|
136,028 |
|
|
|
3,427 |
|
|
|
(139,455 |
) |
|
|
118,527 |
|
F-61
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Navios |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maritime |
|
Other |
|
Non |
|
|
|
|
Income Statement for the year |
|
Holdings Inc. |
|
Guarantor |
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
ended December 31, 2007 (in 000s US$) |
|
Issuer |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Eliminations |
|
Total |
Revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
748,731 |
|
|
|
9,689 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
758,420 |
|
Gain on forward freight agreements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,379 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,379 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Time charter, voyage and port terminal
expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(553,713 |
) |
|
|
(3,860 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(557,573 |
) |
Direct vessel expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27,892 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27,892 |
) |
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
(3,101 |
) |
|
|
(19,450 |
) |
|
|
(507 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23,058 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(2,808 |
) |
|
|
(27,225 |
) |
|
|
(1,867 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31,900 |
) |
Interest income from finance leases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,507 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,507 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
6,556 |
|
|
|
4,115 |
|
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,819 |
|
Interest expenses and finance cost, net |
|
|
(48,537 |
) |
|
|
(2,552 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(51,089 |
) |
Gain on sale of assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
167,511 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
167,511 |
|
Other income |
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
401 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
445 |
|
Other expense |
|
|
(99 |
) |
|
|
(1,303 |
) |
|
|
(644 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,046 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before equity in net earnings
of affiliated companies and taxes |
|
|
(47,949 |
) |
|
|
318,509 |
|
|
|
2,963 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
273,523 |
|
Income from subsidiaries |
|
|
318,950 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(318,950 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in net earnings of affiliated
companies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,929 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,929 |
|
Income before taxes |
|
|
271,001 |
|
|
|
320,438 |
|
|
|
2,963 |
|
|
|
(318,950 |
) |
|
|
275,452 |
|
Income tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,451 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,451 |
) |
Net Income |
|
|
271,001 |
|
|
|
315,987 |
|
|
|
2,963 |
|
|
|
(318,950 |
) |
|
|
271,001 |
|
F-62
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Navios |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maritime |
|
Other |
|
Non |
|
|
|
|
Income Statement for the year |
|
Holdings Inc. |
|
Guarantor |
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
ended December 31, 2006 (in 000s US$) |
|
Issuer |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Eliminations |
|
Total |
Revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
196,646 |
|
|
|
8,729 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
205,375 |
|
Gain on forward freight agreements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,786 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,786 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Time charter, voyage and port terminal
expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(80,620 |
) |
|
|
(3,605 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(84,225 |
) |
Direct vessel expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,863 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,863 |
) |
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
(1,866 |
) |
|
|
(12,699 |
) |
|
|
(492 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,057 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(2,812 |
) |
|
|
(32,430 |
) |
|
|
(1,887 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(37,129 |
) |
Provisions for losses on accounts receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,242 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,242 |
) |
Interest income |
|
|
2,735 |
|
|
|
1,086 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,832 |
|
Interest expenses and finance cost, net |
|
|
(47,429 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(47,429 |
) |
Other income |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
1,737 |
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,819 |
|
Other expense |
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
(425 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(472 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before equity in net earnings of
affiliated companies |
|
|
(49,414 |
) |
|
|
66,976 |
|
|
|
2,833 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,395 |
|
Income from subsidiaries |
|
|
70,483 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(70,483 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Equity in net earnings of affiliated companies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
674 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
674 |
|
Net Income |
|
|
21,069 |
|
|
|
67,650 |
|
|
|
2,833 |
|
|
|
(70,483 |
) |
|
|
21,069 |
|
F-63
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Navios |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maritime |
|
Other |
|
Non |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Holdings Inc. |
|
Guarantor |
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet as at December 31, 2008 |
|
Issuer |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Eliminations |
|
Total |
Cash and cash equivalent |
|
|
9,637 |
|
|
|
112,471 |
|
|
|
11,516 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
133,624 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,808 |
|
|
|
1,050 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,858 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
95,916 |
|
|
|
13,864 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
109,780 |
|
Intercompany receivables |
|
|
458,512 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
(458,553 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Short term derivative assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
214,156 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
214,156 |
|
Short term backlog asset |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44 |
|
Due from affiliate companies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,677 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,677 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
22,210 |
|
|
|
6,041 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,270 |
|
Total current assets |
|
|
468,168 |
|
|
|
463,238 |
|
|
|
32,556 |
|
|
|
(458,553 |
) |
|
|
505,409 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposit for vessel acquisitions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
404,096 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
404,096 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vessels, port terminal and other fixed
assets, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
486,857 |
|
|
|
250,237 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
737,094 |
|
Long term derivative asset |
|
|
2,318 |
|
|
|
34,379 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,697 |
|
Investments in subsidiaries |
|
|
923,348 |
|
|
|
185,810 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,109,158 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Investment in available for sale securities |
|
|
22,358 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,358 |
|
Investment in affiliates |
|
|
3,830 |
|
|
|
1,775 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,605 |
|
Investment in leased assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,998 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,998 |
|
Deferred financing costs, net |
|
|
12,219 |
|
|
|
810 |
|
|
|
420 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,449 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred dry dock and special survey costs,
net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,440 |
|
|
|
1,433 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,873 |
|
Other long term assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,535 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,535 |
|
Goodwill and other intangibles |
|
|
106,433 |
|
|
|
182,346 |
|
|
|
206,731 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
495,510 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-current assets |
|
|
1,070,506 |
|
|
|
1,318,511 |
|
|
|
468,356 |
|
|
|
(1,109,158 |
) |
|
|
1,748,215 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
1,538,674 |
|
|
|
1,781,749 |
|
|
|
500,912 |
|
|
|
(1,567,711 |
) |
|
|
2,253,624 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Account payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
62,355 |
|
|
|
10,165 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72,520 |
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities |
|
|
3,791 |
|
|
|
32,938 |
|
|
|
9,058 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,787 |
|
Dividend payable |
|
|
9,096 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,096 |
|
Intercompany Payables |
|
|
|
|
|
|
458,553 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(458,553 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Short term derivative liability |
|
|
|
|
|
|
128,952 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
128,952 |
|
Current portion of long term debt |
|
|
10,920 |
|
|
|
1,120 |
|
|
|
3,137 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,177 |
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
23,807 |
|
|
|
683,918 |
|
|
|
22,360 |
|
|
|
(458,553 |
) |
|
|
271,532 |
|
Long term debt, net of current portion |
|
|
709,047 |
|
|
|
85,300 |
|
|
|
78,191 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
872,538 |
|
Long term liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,646 |
|
|
|
22,181 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,827 |
|
Long term derivative liability |
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,691 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,691 |
|
Unfavorable lease terms |
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,179 |
|
|
|
1,505 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76,684 |
|
Deferred tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,573 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,573 |
|
Total non-current liabilities |
|
|
709,047 |
|
|
|
209,816 |
|
|
|
128,450 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,047,313 |
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
732,854 |
|
|
|
893,734 |
|
|
|
150,810 |
|
|
|
(458,553 |
) |
|
|
1,318,845 |
|
Minority interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
128,959 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
128,959 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
805,820 |
|
|
|
888,015 |
|
|
|
221,143 |
|
|
|
(1,109,158 |
) |
|
|
805,820 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
|
|
1,538,674 |
|
|
|
1,781,749 |
|
|
|
500,912 |
|
|
|
(1,567,711 |
) |
|
|
2,253,624 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-64
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Navios |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maritime |
|
Other |
|
Non |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Holdings Inc. |
|
Guarantor |
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet as at December 31, 2007 |
|
Issuer |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Eliminations |
|
Total |
Cash and cash equivalent |
|
|
211,183 |
|
|
|
209,034 |
|
|
|
7,350 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
427,567 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
83,697 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83,697 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
104,565 |
|
|
|
294 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
104,968 |
|
Intercompany receivables |
|
|
227,680 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(227,680 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Short term derivative assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
184,038 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
184,038 |
|
Short term backlog asset |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,279 |
|
|
|
175 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,454 |
|
Due from affiliate companies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,458 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,458 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
3,210 |
|
|
|
37,728 |
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,063 |
|
Total current assets |
|
|
442,182 |
|
|
|
625,799 |
|
|
|
7,944 |
|
|
|
(227,680 |
) |
|
|
848,245 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposit on exercise of vessels purchase option |
|
|
|
|
|
|
208,254 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
208,254 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vessels, port terminal and other fixed
assets, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
400,621 |
|
|
|
24,970 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
425,591 |
|
Long term derivative asset |
|
|
|
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90 |
|
Investments in subsidiaries |
|
|
783,893 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(783,893 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Investment in associates and joint ventures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,079 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,079 |
|
Investment in leased asset |
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,756 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,756 |
|
Deferred financing cost, net |
|
|
13,017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred dry dock and special survey costs,
net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,153 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,153 |
|
Long term backlog asset |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44 |
|
Goodwill and other intangibles |
|
|
109,251 |
|
|
|
259,774 |
|
|
|
43,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
412,775 |
|
Total non-current assets |
|
|
906,161 |
|
|
|
931,727 |
|
|
|
68,764 |
|
|
|
(783,893 |
) |
|
|
1,122,759 |
|
Total Assets |
|
|
1,348,343 |
|
|
|
1,557,526 |
|
|
|
76,708 |
|
|
|
(1,011,573 |
) |
|
|
1,971,004 |
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS
EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Account payable |
|
|
292 |
|
|
|
106,373 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106,665 |
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities |
|
|
8,948 |
|
|
|
59,434 |
|
|
|
600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68,982 |
|
Deferred tax liability |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,663 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,663 |
|
Intercompany Payables |
|
|
|
|
|
|
221,756 |
|
|
|
5,924 |
|
|
|
(227,680 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Short term derivative liability |
|
|
|
|
|
|
256,961 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
256,961 |
|
Current portion of long term debt |
|
|
11,000 |
|
|
|
3,220 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,220 |
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
20,240 |
|
|
|
651,407 |
|
|
|
6,524 |
|
|
|
(227,680 |
) |
|
|
450,491 |
|
Long term debt, net of current portion |
|
|
558,899 |
|
|
|
40,930 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
599,829 |
|
Long term liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
603 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
638 |
|
Long term derivative liability |
|
|
|
|
|
|
818 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
818 |
|
Unfavorable lease terms |
|
|
|
|
|
|
96,217 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96,217 |
|
Deferred tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,807 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,807 |
|
Total non-current liabilities |
|
|
558,899 |
|
|
|
192,375 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
751,309 |
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
579,139 |
|
|
|
843,782 |
|
|
|
6,559 |
|
|
|
(227,680 |
) |
|
|
1,201,800 |
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
769,204 |
|
|
|
713,744 |
|
|
|
70,149 |
|
|
|
(783,893 |
) |
|
|
769,204 |
|
Total Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
|
|
1,348,343 |
|
|
|
1,557,526 |
|
|
|
76,708 |
|
|
|
(1,011,573 |
) |
|
|
1,971,004 |
|
F-65
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Navios |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maritime |
|
Other |
|
Non |
|
|
|
|
Cash flow statement for |
|
Holdings Inc. |
|
Guarantor |
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
the year ended December 31, 2008 |
|
Issuer |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Eliminations |
|
Total |
Net cash (used
in)/provided by
operating
activities |
|
|
(277,609 |
) |
|
|
221,002 |
|
|
|
28,219 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28,388 |
) |
Cash flows from
investing
activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of
subsidiaries, net
of cash acquired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(113,161 |
) |
|
|
5,592 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(107,569 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits in escrow
in connection with
acquisition of
subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,500 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,500 |
) |
Receipts from
finance lease |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,843 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,843 |
|
Proceeds from sale
of assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,088 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,088 |
|
Acquisition of
vessels |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(118,814 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(118,814 |
) |
Deposits on vessel
acquisitions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(197,853 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(197,853 |
) |
Purchase of
property and
equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,621 |
) |
|
|
(99,211 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(100,832 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in
investing activity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(359,018 |
) |
|
|
(93,619 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(452,637 |
)) |
Cash flows from
financing
activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common
stock |
|
|
6,749 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,749 |
|
Proceeds from long
term borrowing, net
of finance fees |
|
|
191,728 |
|
|
|
51,223 |
|
|
|
69,566 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
312,517 |
|
Principal payment
on long term debt |
|
|
(42,793 |
) |
|
|
(9,770 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(52,563 |
) |
Acquisition of
treasury stock |
|
|
(51,033 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(51,033 |
) |
Dividends paid |
|
|
(28,588 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28,588 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided
by financing
activity |
|
|
76,063 |
|
|
|
41,453 |
|
|
|
69,566 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
187,082 |
|
Net increase in
cash and cash
equivalents |
|
|
(201,546 |
) |
|
|
(96,563 |
) |
|
|
4,166 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(293,943 |
) |
Cash and cash
equivalents, at
beginning of period |
|
|
211,183 |
|
|
|
209,034 |
|
|
|
7,350 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
427,567 |
|
Cash and cash
equivalents, at end
of period |
|
|
9,637 |
|
|
|
112,471 |
|
|
|
11,516 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
133,624 |
|
F-66
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Navios |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maritime |
|
Other |
|
Non |
|
|
|
|
Cash flow statement for |
|
Holdings Inc. |
|
Guarantor |
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
the year ended December 31, 2007 |
|
Issuer |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Eliminations |
|
Total |
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
88,907 |
|
|
|
33,408 |
|
|
|
9,427 |
|
|
|
(3,667 |
) |
|
|
128,075 |
|
Cash flows from investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of subsidiaries, net of cash acquired |
|
|
(167,569 |
) |
|
|
22,133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(145,436 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
353,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
353,300 |
|
Receipts from finance lease |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,049 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,049 |
|
Acquisition of vessels |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(44,510 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(44,510 |
) |
Deposit on purchase of vessel |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(188,254 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(188,254 |
) |
Acquisition of fixed assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(600 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(600 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by/(used in) investing activity |
|
|
(167,569 |
) |
|
|
151,118 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,451 |
) |
Cash flows from financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock |
|
|
239,567 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
239,567 |
|
Proceeds from long term borrowing, net of
finance fees |
|
|
122,075 |
|
|
|
16,611 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
138,686 |
|
Principal payment on long term debt |
|
|
(123,250 |
) |
|
|
(12,695 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(135,945 |
) |
Dividends paid |
|
|
(26,023 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,667 |
) |
|
|
3,667 |
|
|
|
(26,023 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by/(used in) financing activity |
|
|
212,369 |
|
|
|
3,916 |
|
|
|
(3,667 |
) |
|
|
3,667 |
|
|
|
216,285 |
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
133,707 |
|
|
|
188,442 |
|
|
|
5,760 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
327,909 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, at beginning of period |
|
|
77,476 |
|
|
|
20,592 |
|
|
|
1,590 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99,658 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, at end of period |
|
|
211,183 |
|
|
|
209,034 |
|
|
|
7,350 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
427,567 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Navios |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maritime |
|
Other |
|
Non |
|
|
|
|
Cash flow statement for |
|
Holdings Inc. |
|
Guarantor |
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
the year ended December 31, 2006 |
|
Issuer |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Eliminations |
|
Total |
Net cash provided by/(used in) operating
activities |
|
|
(44,257 |
) |
|
|
99,493 |
|
|
|
1,196 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56,432 |
|
Cash flows from investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of vessels |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(108,117 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(108,117 |
) |
Acquisition of fixed assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,165 |
) |
|
|
(126 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,291 |
) |
Deposit on exercise of vessel purchase option |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,055 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,055 |
) |
Net cash used in investing activity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(111,337 |
) |
|
|
(126 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(111,463 |
) |
Cash flows from financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock |
|
|
65,453 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,453 |
|
Deferred finance cost |
|
|
(7,775 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,775 |
) |
Proceeds from long term borrowing |
|
|
415,109 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
415,109 |
|
Principal payment on long term debt |
|
|
(340,453 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(340,453 |
) |
Dividends paid |
|
|
(15,382 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,382 |
) |
Net cash provided by financing activity |
|
|
116,952 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
116,952 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash
equivalents |
|
|
72,695 |
|
|
|
(11,844 |
) |
|
|
1,070 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61,921 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, at beginning of period |
|
|
4,781 |
|
|
|
32,436 |
|
|
|
520 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,737 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, at end of period |
|
|
77,476 |
|
|
|
20,592 |
|
|
|
1,590 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99,658 |
|
F-67
NOTE 26: SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
(a) |
|
On February 12, 2009, Navios Holdings received an amount of $4,475 as
a dividend distribution from its affiliate Navios Partners. |
|
(b) |
|
On February 13, 2009, the Board of Directors resolved that a dividend
of $0.06 per common share will be paid on April 3, 2009 to
shareholders on record as of March 16, 2009. |
|
(c) |
|
On February 16, 2009, Navios Holdings concluded a facility of up to
$120,000 to finance the acquisition of two Capesize vessels to be
delivered. The loan is repayable in 20 semi-annual installments and
bears an interest rate of LIBOR plus 1.90%. |
|
(d) |
|
On February 17, 2009, Navios Holdings took delivery of Navios Vega, is
a 58,792 dwt, 2009 built Ultra Handymax built in Japan for an
acquisition cost of approximately $73,500. The purchase price was paid
partially in cash ($40,000) and the remaining $33,500 through a 2%
convertible bond exercisable at a price of $11.00 per share,
exercisable until February 2012. |
|
(e) |
|
In February 2009, the Company issued 55,765 restricted shares to its
Greek employees under the Companys existing stock option plan.
Stock-based awards to be granted to these employees, will be based on
service conditions only and include restricted stocks only. |
|
(f) |
|
In March 2009, Navios Holdings amended its facility agreement with HSH Nordbank and
Commerzbank A.G., effective as of November 15, 2008, as follows: (a) to reduce the SVM ratio
(ratio of the charter-free valuations of the mortgaged vessels over the outstanding loan
amount) from 125% to 100%; (b) to obligate Navios Holdings to accumulate cash reserves into a
pledged account with the agent bank of $14,000 ($5,000 in March 2009 and $1.125 on each loan
repayment date during 2009 and 2010, starting from January 2009); and (c) to set the margin at
200 bps. The amendment is effective until January 31, 2010. At December 31, 2008, Navios
Holdings was in compliance with the financial covenants, including the SVM ratio, as required
under its amended facility agreement However, if Navios Holdings was required to use the
original SVM ratio on December 31, 2008 to test compliance, it may not have been in
compliance. |
|
(g) |
|
In March 2009, Navios Holdings concluded a loan facility of up to $110,000 to be used for
general corporate purposes. The facility is repayable in one installment in February 2011 and
bears interest at a rate of LIBOR plus 2.75%. |
|
(h) |
|
In March 2009, Navios Logistics transferred its loan facility of $70,000 to Marfin Popular
Bank Public Co. Ltd. The loan was transferred under the same terms except for an increase in
margin to 275 bps. |
|
(i) |
|
In accordance with the amended share purchase agreement for
the acquisition of Horamar performed in March 2009, the final EBITDA target may be resolved until June 30, 2009. |
F-68
SIGNATURE
Navios Maritime Holdings Inc. hereby certifies that it meets all of the requirements for
filing its Annual Report on Form 20-F and that it has duly caused and authorized the undersigned to
sign this Annual Report on its behalf.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Navios Maritime Holdings Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Angeliki Frangou |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name:
|
|
Angeliki Frangou |
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
|
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
Date:
April 14, 2009
EX-8.1
Exhibit 8.1
List of Subsidiaries of Navios Maritime Holdings Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ownership |
|
Country of |
Company Name |
|
Nature/Vessel Name |
|
Interest |
|
Incorporation |
Navios Maritime Holdings Inc.
|
|
Holding Company
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Navios Corporation
|
|
Sub-Holding Company
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Navios International Inc.
|
|
Operating Company
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Navimax Corporation
|
|
Operating Company
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Navios Handybulk Inc.
|
|
Operating Company
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hestia Shipping Ltd.
|
|
Operating Company
|
|
100%
|
|
Malta |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anemos Maritime Holdings Inc.
|
|
Sub-Holding Company
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Navios ShipManagement Inc.
|
|
Management Company
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NAV Holdings Limited
|
|
Sub-Holding Company
|
|
100%
|
|
Malta |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kleimar N.V.
|
|
Operating
company/Vessel
owning company
|
|
100%
|
|
Belgium |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kleimar Ltd.
|
|
Operating company
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bulkinvest S.A.
|
|
Operating company
|
|
100%
|
|
Luxembourg |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Primavera Shipping Corporation
|
|
Operating company
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ginger Services Co.
|
|
Operating company
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Astra Maritime Corporation
|
|
Operating company
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Achilles Shipping Corporation
|
|
Operating company
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apollon Shipping Corporation
|
|
Operating company
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Herakles Shipping Corporation
|
|
Operating company
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hios Shipping Corporation
|
|
Operating company
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ionian Shipping Corporation
|
|
Operating company
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kypros Shipping Corporation
|
|
Operating company
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Meridian Shipping Enterprises Inc.
|
|
Navios Meridian
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mercator Shipping Corporation
|
|
Navios Mercator
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arc Shipping Corporation
|
|
Navios Arc
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Horizon Shipping Enterprises
Corporation
|
|
Navios Horizon
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Magellan Shipping Corporation
|
|
Navios Magellan
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aegean Shipping Corporation
|
|
Operating Company
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ownership |
|
Country of |
Company Name |
|
Nature/Vessel Name |
|
Interest |
|
Incorporation |
Star Maritime Enterprises Corporation
|
|
Navios Star
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aurora Shipping Enterprises Ltd.
|
|
Navios Aurora I
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corsair Shipping Ltd
|
|
Navios Ulysses
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rowboat Marine Inc.
|
|
Navios Vega
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hyperion Enterprises Inc.
|
|
Navios Hyperion
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beaufiks Shipping Corporation
|
|
Vessel Owning Company
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sagittarius Shipping Corporation
|
|
Vessel Owning Company
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nostos Shipmanagement Corp.
|
|
Vessel Owning Company
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portorosa Marine Corporation
|
|
Navios Happiness
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shikhar Ventures S.A
|
|
Vessel Owning Company
|
|
100%
|
|
Liberia |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sizzling Ventures Inc.
|
|
Operating Company
|
|
100%
|
|
Liberia |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rheia Associates Co.
|
|
Operating Company
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taharqa Spirit Corp.
|
|
Operating Company
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rumer Holding Ltd.
|
|
Vessel Owning Company
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chilali Corp.
|
|
Vessel Owning Company
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pharos Navigation S.A.
|
|
Vessel Owning Company
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pueblo Holdings Ltd.
|
|
Navios Lumen
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Surf Maritime Co.
|
|
Navios Pollux
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quena Shipmanagement Inc.
|
|
Operating Company
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orbiter Shipping Corp.
|
|
Navios Orbiter
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
White Narcissus Marine S.A.
|
|
Navios Asteriks
|
|
100%
|
|
Panama |
|
Navios G.P. L.L.C.
|
|
Operating Company
|
|
100%
|
|
Marshall Is. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Navios South American Logistics and Subsidiaries:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ownership |
|
Country of |
Company Name |
|
Nature/Vessel Name |
|
Interest |
|
Incorporation |
Navios South American Logistics Inc.
|
|
Sub-Holding Company
|
|
65.48%
|
|
Marshal Is. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporacion Navios SA
|
|
Operating Company
|
|
65.48%
|
|
Uruguay |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nauticler SA
|
|
Sub-Holding Company
|
|
65.48%
|
|
Uruguay |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compania Naviera Horamar SA
|
|
Operating Company
|
|
65.48%
|
|
Argentina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compania de Transporte Fluvial Int SA
|
|
Operating Company
|
|
65.48%
|
|
Uruguay |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ponte Rio SA
|
|
Operating Company
|
|
65.48%
|
|
Uruguay |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thalassa Energy SA
|
|
Barges Owning
Company
|
|
40.93%
|
|
Argentina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HS Tankers Inc. (ii)
|
|
Vessel Owning
Company
|
|
33.39%
|
|
Panama |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HS Navegation Inc.
|
|
Estefania
|
|
33.39%
|
|
Panama |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HS Shipping Ltd Inc.
|
|
Malva H
|
|
40.93%
|
|
Panama |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HS South Inc. (ii)
|
|
Vessel Owning
Company
|
|
40.93%
|
|
Panama |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mercopar Internacional S.A.
|
|
Holding Company
|
|
65.48%
|
|
Uruguay |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nagusa Internacional S.A.
|
|
Holding Company
|
|
65.48%
|
|
Uruguay |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hidrovia OSR Internacional S.A.
|
|
Holding Company
|
|
65.48%
|
|
Uruguay |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Petrovia Internacional S.A.
|
|
Holding Company
|
|
65.48%
|
|
Uruguay |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mercopar S.A.
|
|
Shipping Company
|
|
65.48%
|
|
Paraguay |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Navegation Guarani S.A.
|
|
Shipping Company
|
|
65.48%
|
|
Paraguay |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hidrovia OSR S.A.
|
|
Oil Spill Response &
Salvage Services
|
|
65.48%
|
|
Paraguay |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Petrovia S.A.
|
|
Shipping Company
|
|
65.48%
|
|
Paraguay |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mercofluvial S.A.
|
|
Shipping Company
|
|
65.48%
|
|
Paraguay |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Petrolera San Antonio S.A. (PETROSAN)
|
|
Oil Storage Plant
and Dock Facilities
|
|
65.48%
|
|
Paraguay |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flota Mercante Paraguaya S.A.
|
|
Shipping Company
|
|
65.48%
|
|
Paraguay |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compania de Transporte Fluvial S.A.
|
|
Shipping Company
|
|
65.48%
|
|
Paraguay |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hidrogas S.A.
|
|
Shipping Company
|
|
65.48%
|
|
Paraguay |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stability Oceanways S.A.
|
|
Shipping Company
|
|
65.48%
|
|
Panama |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
List of Affiliates of Navios Maritime Holdings Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ownership |
|
Country of |
Company Name |
|
Nature/Vessel Name |
|
Interest |
|
Incorporation |
Navios Maritime Partners L.P.
|
|
Sub-Holding Company
|
|
37.1%
|
|
Marshall Is. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Navios Maritime Operating L.L.C.
|
|
Operating Company
|
|
37.1%
|
|
Marshall Is. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Libra Shipping Enterprises Corporation
|
|
Navios Libra II
|
|
37.1%
|
|
Marshall Is. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alegria Shipping Corporation
|
|
Navios Alegria
|
|
37.1%
|
|
Marshall Is. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Felicity Shipping Corporation
|
|
Navios Felicity
|
|
37.1%
|
|
Marshall Is. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gemini Shipping Corporation
|
|
Navios Gemini S
|
|
37.1%
|
|
Marshal Is. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Galaxy Shipping Corporation
|
|
Navios Galaxy I
|
|
37.1%
|
|
Marshall Is. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prosperity Shipping Corporation
|
|
Navios Prosperity
|
|
37.1%
|
|
Marshall Is. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fantastiks Shipping Corporation
|
|
Navios Fantastiks
|
|
37.1%
|
|
Marshall Is. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aldebaran Shipping Corporation
|
|
Navios Aldebaran
|
|
37.1%
|
|
Marshall Is. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aurora Shipping Enterprises Ltd.
|
|
Navios Aurora I
|
|
37.1%
|
|
Marshall Is. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acropolis Chartering & Shipping Inc.
|
|
Brokerage Company
|
|
50%
|
|
Liberia |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Navios Maritime Acquisition Corporation
|
|
Sub-Holding Company
|
|
19%
|
|
Marshall Is. |
EX-12.1
Exhibit 12.1
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Angeliki Frangou, certify that:
1. |
|
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Navios Maritime Holdings Inc.; |
|
2. |
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light
of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this report; |
|
3. |
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report; |
|
4. |
|
The companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15(d)-15(f)) for the company and have: |
|
a) |
|
Designed such disclosure controls and
procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the
company, including its consolidated
subsidiary, is made known to us by
others within that entity, particularly
during the period in which this report
is being prepared; |
|
|
b) |
|
Designed such internal control over
financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial
reporting to be designed under our
supervision, to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of
financial reporting and the preparation
of the financial statements for external
purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles; |
|
|
c) |
|
Evaluated the effectiveness of the
companys disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report
our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period
covered by this report on such
evaluation; and |
|
|
d) |
|
Disclosed in this report any change in
the companys internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during
the period covered by the annual report
that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect,
the companys internal control over
financial reporting: and |
5. |
|
The companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors and
the audit committee of the companys board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions): |
|
a) |
|
All significant deficiencies and
material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the companys
ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; and |
|
|
b) |
|
Any fraud, whether or not material, that
involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the
companys internal controls over
financial reporting. |
Date:
April 14, 2009
/s/ Angeliki Frangou
Angeliki Frangou
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
EX-12.2
Exhibit 12.2
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, George Achniotis, certify that:
1. |
|
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Navios Maritime Holdings Inc.; |
|
2. |
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light
of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this report; |
|
3. |
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report; |
|
4. |
|
The companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15(d)-15(f)) for the company and have: |
|
a) |
|
Designed such disclosure controls and
procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the
company, including its consolidated
subsidiary, is made known to us by
others within that entity, particularly
during the period in which this report
is being prepared; |
|
|
b) |
|
Designed such internal control over
financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial
reporting to be designed under our
supervision, to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of
financial reporting and the preparation
of the financial statements for external
purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles; |
|
|
c) |
|
Evaluated the effectiveness of the
companys disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report
our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period
covered by this report on such
evaluation; and |
|
|
d) |
|
Disclosed in this report any change in
the companys internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during
the period covered by the annual report
that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect,
the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and |
5. |
|
The companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors and
the audit committee of the companys board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions): |
|
a) |
|
All significant deficiencies and
material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the companys
ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; and |
|
|
b) |
|
Any fraud, whether or not material, that
involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the
companys internal controls over
financial reporting. |
Date:
April 14, 2009
/s/ George Achniotis
George Achniotis
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
EX-13.1
Exhibit 13.1
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the
undersigned officers of Navios Maritime Holdings Inc. (the Company) hereby certify, to such
officers knowledge, that:
|
(i) |
|
the accompanying report on Form 20-F of the Company for the year
ended December 31, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|
|
(ii) |
|
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: April 14, 2009
|
|
/s/ Angeliki Frangou
Angeliki Frangou
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: April 14, 2009
|
|
/s/ George Achniotis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
George Achniotis |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
EX-15.1
Exhibit 15.1
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form F-3 (No.
333-141872 and No. 333-136936) and Form S-8 (No. 333-147186) of Navios Maritime Holdings Inc. of
our report dated April 14, 2009 relating to the financial statements and the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 20-F.
PricewaterhouseCoopers S.A.
Athens, Greece
April 14, 2009