UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
_________________________________
FORM
_________________________________
(Mark One)
OR
For the fiscal year ended
OR
OR
Date of event requiring shell company report
For the transition period from to
Commission file number
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Not Applicable
(Translation of Registrant’s Name into English)
Republic of
(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
P.O. Box 309,
(Address of principal executive offices)
Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP
Tel: (
Fax: (212) 859-4000
(Name, Telephone, E-mail and/or Facsimile number and Address of Company Contact Person)
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class |
Trading Symbol | Name of each exchange on which registered | ||
8.75% Series G Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock, par value $0.0001 per share (“Series G”) | The New York Stock Exchange* | |||
NM-PG | ||||
8.625% Series H Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock, par value $0.0001 per share (“Series H”) |
The New York Stock Exchange * | |||
Series H |
NM-PH | |
* | Not for trading, but in connection with the registration of American Depositary Shares, pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission. |
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act. None
Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act. None
Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer’s classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the Annual Report:
shares of common stock, shares of Series G and shares of Series H and 1,000 shares of Series I Preferred Stock were outstanding as of December 31, 2022
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☐
If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Yes ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or an emerging growth company. See the definition of “accelerated filer” and “large accelerated filer,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer ☐ | Accelerated filer ☐ | |||
Emerging growth company |
If an emerging growth company that prepares its financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards† provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐
† | The term “new or revised financial accounting standard” refers to any update issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board to its Accounting Standards Codification after April 5, 2012. |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report.
If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b). ☐
Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing:
International Financial Reporting Standards as issued | Other ☐ | |||
by the International Accounting Standards Board ☐ |
If “Other” has been checked in response to the previous question, indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow. Item 17 ☐ Item 18 ☐
If this is an Annual Report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐
TABLE OF CONTENTS
In this Annual Report, “we”, “us”, “our”, the “Company” and “Navios Holdings” all refer to Navios Maritime Holdings Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries, unless the context otherwise requires. We are incorporated as a Republic of the Marshall Islands corporation. References to “Navios Logistics” are to our majority-owned subsidiary Navios South American Logistics Inc., a Republic of the Marshall Islands corporation. References to the “Manager” are to Navios Shipmanagement Inc., a Republic of the Marshall Islands corporation. References to “NSM” are to N Shipmanagement Acquisition Corp together with its wholly-owned subsidiaries.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Annual Report should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes included in this report.
Certain statements under the captions “Item 3D. Risk Factors,” “Item 4. Information on the Company” and “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects” and elsewhere in this report relating to our business and financial outlook (including our statements concerning plans and objectives of management for future operations or economic performance, or assumptions related thereto) constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements are not historical facts, but rather our current views, beliefs and assumptions with respect to expectations, estimates and projections about our industry. Although we believe that these assumptions were reasonable when made, because these assumptions are inherently subject to significant uncertainties and contingencies, which are difficult or impossible to predict and are beyond our control, we cannot assure provide assurance that we will achieve or accomplish these expectations, beliefs or projections. In some cases, the words “may,” “could,” “should,” “would,” “expect,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “forecast,” “believe,” “estimate,” “predict,” “propose,” “potential,” “continue” and similar expressions will identify forward-looking statements.
In addition to these important factors and matters discussed elsewhere herein, important factors that, could cause actual results to differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to:
· | our future financial condition or results of operations and our affiliates’ future revenues and expenses; |
· | demand for seaborne transportation of the products we and our affiliates ship; |
· | the cyclical nature of the international shipping industry; |
· | global and regional economic and political conditions; |
· | the ability and willingness of charterers to fulfill their obligations to us and our affiliates; |
· | prevailing charter rates and vessel values; |
· | shipyards performing drydocking and repairs; |
· | changing vessel crews; |
· | changes in the availability and costs of funding due to conditions in the bank market, capital markets and other factors; |
· | potential disruption of shipping routes due to accidents, diseases, pandemics, political events, wars, piracy or acts by terrorists, uncertainty relating to global trade, including prices of seaborne commodities and continuing issues related to seaborne volume and ton miles; |
· | potential liability and costs due to environmental, safety and other incidents involving our and our affiliates vessels; |
· | the aging of our and our affiliates’ fleet and resultant increases in operations costs; |
1 |
· | the loss of any customer or charter or vessel by us and our affiliates; |
· | the financial condition of our and our affiliates’ customers; |
· | increases in our and our affiliates’ costs and expenses, including but not limited to: crew wages, insurance, provisions, port expenses, lube oil, bunkers, repairs, maintenance, and general and administrative expenses; receipt of dividends and distributions from affiliate companies; |
· | the Company’s ability to maintain compliance with the continued listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”); |
· | the expected cost of, and our ability to comply with, governmental regulations, maritime self-regulatory organization standards, as well as standard regulations imposed by our charterers; |
· | our ability to retain key executive officers; |
· | competitive factors in the markets in which we operate; |
· | the value of our publicly traded subsidiaries; and |
· | risks associated with operations outside the United States, and other important factors described from time to time in the reports we, Navios Logistics and Navios Maritime Partners L.P. (“Navios Partners”) file from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). |
We caution readers of this Annual Report on Form 20-F not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which reflect our view only as of the date of this report. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and other factors, some of which are beyond our control, are difficult to predict and could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or forecasted in the forward-looking statements. We do not undertake any obligation, other than as may be required by law, to update or revise any forward-looking statements to reflect changes in assumptions, the occurrence of unanticipated events, changes in future operating results over time or otherwise.
2 |
PART I
Item 1. Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisers
Not applicable.
Item 2. Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable
Not applicable.
Item 3. Key Information
A. Reserved
B. Capitalization and Indebtedness
Not applicable.
C. Reasons for the Offer and Use of Proceeds
Not applicable.
D. Risk Factors
Risks Associated with Our Operations
• We currently have equity investments in two companies, one of which is not consolidated in our financial results, and our investment in such companies is subject to the risks related to their respective businesses.
Risks Relating to Our Organizational Structure and Other Legal Matters
• | We are a holding company and we depend on the ability of our subsidiaries to distribute funds to us in order to satisfy our financial obligations and to make dividend payments. |
• | Our Chairwoman and Chief Executive Officer, Angeliki Frangou, beneficially owns approximately 64.1% of our common stock, which gives her voting power over matters on which our stockholders are entitled to vote, and accordingly, she can exert considerable influence over our actions. Ms. Frangou may acquire significant additional ownership interests in Navios Holdings, and may have interests that are different from the interests of our other stockholders. |
• | We are incorporated in the Republic of the Marshall Islands, which does not have a well-developed body of corporate law. |
• | Because we are incorporated under the laws of the Republic of the Marshall Islands and our business is operated primarily from our office in the Cayman Islands, it may be difficult to serve us with legal process or enforce judgments against us, our directors or our management. |
• | The international nature of our operations may make the outcome of any bankruptcy proceedings difficult to predict. |
• | Being a foreign private issuer exempts us from certain SEC and NYSE requirements. |
• | Anti-takeover provisions in our amended and restated articles of incorporation could make it difficult for our stockholders to replace or remove our current board of directors or could have the effect of discouraging, delaying or preventing a merger or acquisition, which could adversely affect the market price of our common stock. |
• | The loss of key members of our senior management team could disrupt the management of our business. |
|
• | Our officers, certain of our directors and stockholders are affiliated with entities engaged in business activities similar to those conducted by us, which may compete directly with us, causing such persons to have conflicts of interest and conflicts in the allocation of their time to our business. |
• | We are dependent on the Manager, a wholly-owned subsidiary of NSM for providing administrative services. |
3 |
Risks Relating to Navios Logistics’ Industry and Business
• | The international transportation industry is generally cyclical and volatile, and this may lead to volatility in, and reductions of, Navios Logistics’ vessel contract rates and volatility in its results of operations. |
• | Navios Logistics’ grain port business has seasonal components linked to the grain harvests in the region. At times throughout the year, the capacity of its grain port terminal (the “Grain Port Terminal”), including the loading and unloading operations, as well as the space in silos could be exceeded, which could materially and adversely affect its operations and revenues |
• | Navios Logistics is subject to certain operating risks in its Liquid Port Terminal and the Dry Port Terminals (collectively the “Port Terminal Business”) that could affect the performance of its contractual commitments, and in its barge and cabotage businesses including vessel breakdowns or accidents, which could result in a loss of revenue from the affected vessels, which could result in a loss of revenue and could have a material adverse effect on its results of operations or financial condition. |
• | Navios Logistics derives a significant part of its revenues from a small number of customers, and the loss of one or more of these customers could materially and adversely affect its revenues. |
• | Vale’s payments represent a significant portion of Navios Logistics’ revenue and if Vale were unable or unwilling to fulfill their obligations under the in-force agreements with Navios Logistics, it could significantly reduce Navios Logistics’ revenues and cash flow. |
• | When Navios Logistics’ contracts expire, Navios Logistics may not be able to replace them. |
• | Navios Logistics’ industry is highly competitive, and Navios Logistics may not be able to compete successfully for services with new companies with greater resources. |
• | Navios Logistics’ business can be affected by adverse weather conditions, effects of climate change, public health concerns, and other factors beyond its control, which can affect production of the goods it transports and stores as well as the navigability of the river system on which it operates. |
• | Delays, cancellations or non-completion of deliveries of purchased vessels, including second-hand and newbuilding vessels could have an adverse effect on Navios Logistics’ operating results. |
• | Navios Logistics faces risks and costs associated with ports and vessels, which risks and costs increase as the operational port equipment and vessels age. |
• | Spare parts or other key equipment needed for the operation of its ports and fleet may not be available off the shelf and Navios Logistics may face substantial delays in securing necessary parts or equipment. Failure to obtain necessary spare parts or key equipment in a timely manner could result in a loss of revenue. |
• | Navios Logistics’ failure to receive required approvals to timely complete construction and commence full operation or secure satisfactory commercial contracts of its new planned Port Murtinho Terminal and Nueva Palmira Free Zone port terminal facilities could negatively affect Navios Logistics’ business operations, and Navios Logistics may experience difficulty managing its growth as its expands its business. |
• | Rising crew costs, fuel prices and other cost increases may adversely affect Navios Logistics’ profits. |
• | If Navios Logistics fails to fulfill the oil majors’ vetting processes, such failure could materially and adversely affect the employment of its tanker vessels in the spot and period markets, and consequently have a negative impact on its results of operations. |
• | A failure to pass inspection by classification societies could result in one or more vessels being unemployable unless and until they pass inspection, resulting in a loss of revenues from such vessels, barges or pushboats for that period and a corresponding decrease in operating cash flows. |
• | Navios Logistics’ vessels could be subject to seizure through maritime arrest or government requisition. |
• | The smuggling of drugs or other contraband onto Navios Logistics’ vessels may lead to governmental claims against Navios Logistics. |
• | Navios Logistics may employ its fleet on the spot market and thus expose itself to risk of losses based on short-term decreases in shipping rates. |
• | Because the fair market values of vessels may fluctuate significantly, Navios Logistics may incur losses when they sell its vessels. |
• | Navios Logistics’ industry has inherent operational risks that its insurance may not adequately cover. |
4 |
• | Because Navios Logistics obtains some of its insurance through protection and indemnity associations, they may also be subject to calls, or premiums, in amounts based not only on its own claim records, but also on the claim records of all other members of the protection and indemnity associations. |
Risks Relating to Environmental Matters
• | Navios Logistics is subject to various laws, regulations, and international conventions, particularly environmental and safety laws that could require significant expenditures both to maintain compliance with such laws and to pay for any uninsured environmental liabilities including any resulting from a spill or other environmental incident, which could affect its cash flows and profit. |
• | Navios Logistics is subject to extensive environmental legislation, and if they or its subsidiaries do not comply with the applicable regulations, its business may be adversely affected. |
• | Navios Logistics may be liable for losses and damages to third parties, including environmental damages. |
• | Navios Logistics may fail to comply with the conditions required under its environmental licenses. |
Risks Relating to the Countries in which Navios Logistics Operates
Risks Relating to Argentina
• | Navios Logistics may be adversely affected by the economic, fiscal and political conditions of Argentina. |
• | Continuing inflation may have material adverse effects on the Argentine economy. |
• | The current and future foreign exchange policy of Argentina may affect the ability of Navios Logistics’ Argentine subsidiary to make money remittances outside of Argentina. |
• | The Argentine government has made certain changes to its tax rules that affected Navios Logistics’ operations in Argentina in the past, and could further increase the fiscal burden on its operations in Argentina in the future. |
• | Fluctuations in the value of the Argentine peso could adversely affect the Argentine economy, and consequently Navios Logistics’ results of operations in Argentina or the financial condition of Navios Logistics’ Argentine subsidiary. |
• | The Argentine economy could be adversely affected by economic developments in other global markets. |
• | Future policies of the Argentine government may affect the economy as well as Navios Logistics’ operations in Argentina. |
Risks Relating to Uruguayan Free Zone Regulation
• | Navios Logistics may be materially and adversely affected by any termination, non-renewal or non-extension of the tax incentives that benefit certain of its subsidiaries in Uruguay. |
Other Risks Relating to the Countries in which Navios Logistics’ Operates
• | Navios Logistics is an international company, and as such is exposed to the risks of doing business in many different countries, including risks associated with operating in emerging market countries, whose economies, markets and legal systems may be less developed. |
• | Changes in rules and regulations with respect to cabotage or the interpretation of such rules and regulations in the markets in which Navios Logistics’ operate could have a material adverse effect on its results of operations. |
• | Because Navios Logistics generates the majority of its revenues in U.S. dollars but incurs a significant portion of its expenses in other currencies, exchange rate fluctuations could cause it to suffer exchange rate losses, thereby increasing expenses and reducing income. |
5 |
Risks Relating to Our Common Stock
• | Our stock price may be volatile, and investors in our common stock could lose all or part of their investment. |
• | You may experience future proportionate ownership dilution as a result of future equity offerings, or other issuances of our common shares, preferred shares or other securities, including shares issued for debt repayment purposes or otherwise. |
• | The NYSE may delist our securities from quotation on its exchange, which could limit the ability of our security holders to trade our securities and subject us to additional trading restrictions. |
• | Changing laws and evolving reporting requirements could have an adverse effect on our business, including the pending SEC Environmental, Social and Governance (“ESG”) disclosure rules in the U.S. and European Union. |
Risks Relating to Our Series G Shares, Series H Shares and the Depositary Shares
• | Our Series G shares (“Series G’) and Series H shares (“Series H” and, together with the Series G, the “Series G and H”) are represented by American Depositary Shares (the “Depositary Shares”). The Depositary Shares are subordinated to our debt obligations, and the interests of a holder of Series G, Series H or Depositary Shares could be diluted by the issuance of additional shares, including additional Series G or Series H or by other transactions. |
• | We may not have sufficient cash from our operations to enable us to pay dividends on or to redeem our Series G and H, and accordingly the Depositary Shares, as the case may be, following the payment of expenses and the establishment of any reserves. |
• | Our ability to pay dividends on and to redeem our Series G and H, and therefore holders’ ability to receive payments on the Depositary Shares, is limited by the requirements of Marshall Islands law. |
• | The Series G and H represent perpetual equity interests. |
• | Holders of Depositary Shares have extremely limited voting rights. The voting rights of holders of Depositary Shares are more limited than the voting rights of holders of the Series G and H. Holders of Depositary Shares may encounter difficulties in exercising some of such voting rights. |
• | The Depositary Shares lack a well-developed trading market. Various factors may adversely affect the price of the Depositary Shares. |
• | Depositary Shares became less liquid following the Exchange Offer. |
• | The Series G and H represented by the Depositary Shares have not been rated, and ratings of any other of our securities may affect the trading price of the Depositary Shares. |
• | The amount of the liquidation preference of our Series G and H is fixed and holders will have no right to receive any greater payment regardless of the circumstances. |
• | The Series G and H are redeemable only at our option and investors should not expect us to redeem either the Series G or the Series H on the dates they respectively become redeemable or at any time afterwards. |
• | Holders of Depositary Shares may be subject to additional risks related to holding Depositary Shares rather than holding shares directly. |
Risks Relating to Navios Logistics’ Indebtedness
• | Navios Logistics has substantial debt and may incur substantial additional debt, which could adversely affect its financial health and ability to obtain financing in the future, react to changes in the business and make payments on the $500.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 10.75% Senior Secured Notes due 2025, issued by Navios Logistics and Navios Logistics Finance (US) Inc. as Co-Issuers on July 8, 2020 and due on July 1, 2025 (the “2025 Notes”) and our other obligations. |
• | The agreements and instruments governing Navios Logistics’ debt contain restrictions and limitations that could have a significant negative impact on its ability to operate its business. |
6 |
• | Navios Logistics’‘ability to generate the significant amount of cash needed to service its debt obligations and its ability to refinance all or a portion of its indebtedness or obtain additional financing depends on many factors, many of which may be beyond its control. |
• | Navios Logistics is subject to volatility in interest rates, including SOFR under its debt obligations, which could affect its profitability, earnings and cash flow. |
• | The market values of Navios Logistics’ vessels may fluctuate significantly, which could cause Navios Logistics to be in breach of certain debt covenants that currently has or debt covenants that it may incur in the future. |
• | Navios Logistics may be unable to raise funds necessary to finance the change of control repurchase offer required by the indenture governing the 2025 Notes. |
• | The international nature of Navios Logistics’ operations may make the outcome of any insolvency or bankruptcy proceedings or other exercise of remedies outside of bankruptcy difficult to predict. |
• | Certain requirements must be met for the recognition and enforceability of a foreign judgment by courts outside the United States. |
• | Obligations under the guarantees are subordinated to certain statutory preferences. |
• | The 2025 Notes are subject to certain fraudulent transfer and conveyance statutes, which may have adverse implications for the holders of the 2025 Notes. |
Tax Risks
• | We may have earned U.S. source income that was subject to U.S. federal income tax, thereby adversely affecting our results of operations and cash flows. |
• | Navios Holdings may be taxed as a U.S. corporation. |
• | A change in tax laws, treaties or regulations, or their interpretation, of any country in which we operate our business could result in a high tax rate on our worldwide earnings, which could result in a significant negative impact on our earnings and cash flows from operations. |
• | U.S. tax authorities could treat us as a “passive foreign investment company,” which could have adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences to U.S. holders. |
• | U.S. persons that own 10% or more of our equity interests may be subject to adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences under rules applicable to U.S. shareholders of controlled foreign corporations. |
Readers should carefully consider each of the following risks together with the other information contained in or incorporated by reference into this Annual Report when evaluating the Company’s business and its prospects. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones the Company faces. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to the Company or that the Company currently considers immaterial may also impair the Company’s business operations. If any of the following risks relating to our business and operations actually occur, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected and in that case, the trading price of our common stock could decline.
Risks Associated with Our Operations
We currently have equity investments in two companies, one of which is not consolidated in our financial results, and our investment in such companies is subject to the risks related to their respective businesses.
As of December 31, 2022, we had a 63.8% ownership interest in Navios Logistics, and, as a result, Navios Logistics is a consolidated subsidiary. As such, the income and losses relating to Navios Logistics and the indebtedness and other liabilities of Navios Logistics are incorporated in our consolidated financial statements.
As of December 31, 2022, we had a 10.3% ownership interest in Navios Partners. On March 31 2021, Navios Partners completed the acquisition (“NMCI Merger”) of Navios Maritime Containers L.P. (“Navios Containers”) (Refer to Note 9 “Investments in Affiliate Companies” to the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report). On October 15, 2021 Navios Partners completed the merger (“NNA Merger” and together with the NMCI Merger, the “Mergers”) with Navios Maritime Acquisition Corporation (“Navios Acquisition”) (Refer to Note 9 “Investments in Affiliate Companies” to the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report). Following the Mergers, we have an equity investment in one public company (Navios Partners) that is accounted for under the equity method. As of December 31, 2022, the carrying value of our investment in Navios Partners amounted to $99.3 million.
7 |
In addition to the value of our investment, we receive dividend payments relating to our investments. As a result of our investment, in fiscal year 2022, we received $0.6 million in dividends from Navios Partners.
Our ownership interest in Navios Logistics and Navios Partners, and previously also in Navios Containers and Navios Acquisition (now both merged with Navios Partners), and the reflection of such companies (or the investment relating thereto) on our balance sheets and any income generated from or related to such companies are subject to a variety of risks, including risks relating to their respective businesses as disclosed in their respective public filings with the SEC or management reports. Please see the latest Reports on Form 20-F filed by Navios Logistics and Navios Partners. The occurrence of any such risks may negatively affect our financial condition.
We evaluate our investment in Navios Partners and evaluated our investments in Navios Containers and Navios Acquisition (through their NMCI Merger and NNA Merger in March 2021 and September 2021, respectively) for “other-than-temporary impairment” (“OTTI”) on a quarterly basis. Consideration is given to (i) the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than the carrying value, (ii) their financial condition and near term prospects, and (iii) our intent and ability to retain our investment in these companies, for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value. Refer to Note 9 “Investments in Affiliate Companies” and Note 16 “Transactions with Related Parties” included elsewhere in this Annual Report.
Risks Relating to Our Organizational Structure and Other Legal Matters
We are a holding company and we depend on the ability of our subsidiaries to distribute funds to us in order to satisfy our financial obligations and to make distributions.
We are a holding company and our subsidiaries conduct all of our operations and own all of our operating assets. We have no significant assets other than the equity interests in our subsidiaries. As a result, our ability to pay our obligations and to make distributions depends entirely on our subsidiaries and their ability to distribute funds to us. The ability of a subsidiary to make these distributions could be affected by a claim or other action by a third party, including a creditor, or by the law of their respective jurisdiction of incorporation that regulates the payment of dividends. If we are unable to obtain funds from our subsidiaries, our Board of Directors may exercise its discretion not to declare or pay dividends.
Our Chairwoman and Chief Executive Officer, Angeliki Frangou, beneficially owns approximately 64.1% of our common stock, which gives her voting power over matters on which our stockholders are entitled to vote, and accordingly, she can exert considerable influence over our actions. Ms. Frangou may acquire significant additional ownership interests in Navios Holdings, and may have interests that are different from the interests of our other stockholders.
As of the date of this report, our Chairwoman and Chief Executive Officer, Ms. Angeliki Frangou, beneficially owns approximately 64.1% of the outstanding shares of our common stock directly or through her affiliate companies, including the common shares issuable to NSM in connection with the Convertible Debenture (as defined herein). Ms. Frangou’s Schedule 13D indicates that she intends, subject to market conditions, to purchase up to $20.0 million of our common stock (as of April 04, 2022, she had purchased approximately $10.0 million in aggregate purchase price of our common stock).
Pursuant to the NSM Loans (as defined herein), NSM has the option to convert any portion of the outstanding principal balance under the Convertible Debenture into shares of our common stock in accordance with a contractually determined formula.
As the Chairwoman, Chief Executive Officer and our largest stockholder, she has the power to exert considerable influence over our actions and the outcome of matters on which our stockholders are entitled to vote, including the election of directors and other significant corporate actions. This concentration of ownership may delay, deter or prevent acts that would be favored by our other stockholders or deprive stockholders of an opportunity to receive a premium for their shares as part of a sale of our business. It is possible that the interests of the controlling stockholder may in some cases conflict with the interests of our other stockholders. The interests of our principal stockholder may be different from the interests of our other stockholders. In addition, concentration of share ownership may adversely affect the trading price of our common stock to the extent investors perceive disadvantages in owning shares in a company with concentrated ownership.
The maximum number of shares of our common stock issuable to NSM in connection with the Convertible Debenture is 35.5 million shares. If we issue the maximum number of shares, Ms. Frangou will beneficially own approximately 67.3% of our common stock. For information on the NSM Loans and the Convertible Debenture, see Note 11 “Borrowings” and Note 16 “Transactions with Related Parties” in our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report.
8 |
We are incorporated in the Republic of the Marshall Islands, which does not have a well-developed body of corporate law.
Our corporate affairs are governed by our amended and restated articles of incorporation and by-laws and by the Marshall Islands Business Corporations Act (“BCA”). The provisions of the BCA are intended to resemble provisions of the corporation laws of a number of states in the U.S. However, there have been few judicial cases in the Republic of the Marshall Islands interpreting the BCA. The rights and fiduciary responsibilities of directors under the law of the Republic of the Marshall Islands are not as clearly established as the rights and fiduciary responsibilities of directors under statutes or judicial precedent in existence in certain U.S. jurisdictions. Stockholder rights may differ as well. The BCA does specifically incorporate the non-statutory law, or judicial case law, of the State of Delaware and other states with substantially similar legislative provisions, and the BCA is interpreted and construed by Delaware laws and the laws of other States with substantially similar legislative provisions. Accordingly, an individual investor may have more difficulty protecting his or her interests in the face of actions by management, directors or controlling stockholders than the same investor would have in the case of a corporation incorporated in the State of Delaware or other U.S. jurisdictions.
Because we are incorporated under the laws of the Republic of the Marshall Islands and our business is operated primarily from our office in the Cayman Islands, it may be difficult to serve us with legal process or enforce judgments against us, our directors or our management.
We are a corporation organized under the laws of the Republic of the Marshall Islands, and all of our assets are located outside of the U.S. Our business is operated primarily from our office in the Cayman Islands. In addition, the majority of our directors and officers are residents of non-U.S. jurisdictions and substantial portions of the assets of these persons are located outside of the United States. Thus, it may be difficult or not be possible for investors to affect service of process upon us, or our non-U.S. directors or officers, or to enforce any judgment obtained against these persons in U.S. courts. In addition, it may not be possible to enforce U.S. securities laws or judgments obtained in U.S. courts against these persons in a non-U.S. jurisdiction. Even if an individual investor is successful in bringing an action of this kind, the laws of the Republic of the Marshall Islands, the Cayman Islands and other jurisdictions may prevent or restrict that investor from enforcing a judgment against our assets or the assets of our directors or officers.
The international nature of our operations may make the outcome of any bankruptcy proceedings difficult to predict.
We are incorporated under the laws of the Republic of the Marshall Islands and our subsidiaries are also incorporated under the laws of the Republic of the Marshall Islands, and certain other countries other than the United States. Our business will be operated primarily from our offices in the Cayman Islands. Consequently, in the event of any bankruptcy, insolvency or similar proceedings involving us or one of our subsidiaries, bankruptcy laws other than those of the United States could apply. We have limited operations in the United States. If we become a debtor under the United States bankruptcy laws, bankruptcy courts in the United States may seek to assert jurisdiction over all of our assets, wherever located, including property situated in other countries. There can be no assurance, however, that we would become a debtor in the United States or that a United States bankruptcy court would be entitled to, or accept, jurisdiction over such bankruptcy case or that courts in other countries that have jurisdiction over us and our operations would recognize a United States bankruptcy court’s jurisdiction if any other bankruptcy court would determine it had jurisdiction.
Being a foreign private issuer exempts us from certain SEC and NYSE requirements.
We are a foreign private issuer within the meaning of rules promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). As such, we are exempt from certain provisions applicable to U.S. public companies including:
• | the rules under the Exchange Act requiring the filing with the SEC of quarterly reports on Form 10-Q or current reports on Form 8-K; |
• | the sections of the Exchange Act regulating the solicitation of proxies, consents or authorizations in respect of a security registered under the Exchange Act; |
• | the provisions of Regulation FD aimed at preventing issuers from making selective disclosures of material information; |
• | the sections of the Exchange Act requiring insiders to file public reports of their stock ownership and trading activities and establishing insider liability for profits realized from any “short-swing” trading transaction (i.e., a purchase and sale, or sale and purchase, of the issuer’s equity securities within less than six months); and |
• | the obligation to obtain shareholder approval in connection with the approval of, and material revisions to, equity compensation plans. |
Because of these exemptions, investors are not afforded the same protections or information generally available to investors holding shares in public companies organized in the U.S.
9 |
Anti-takeover provisions in our amended and restated articles of incorporation could make it difficult for our stockholders to replace or remove our current board of directors or could have the effect of discouraging, delaying or preventing a merger or acquisition, which could adversely affect the market price of our common stock.
Several provisions of our amended and restated articles of incorporation and bylaws could make it difficult for our stockholders to change the composition of our board of directors in any one year, preventing them from changing the composition of our management. In addition, the same provisions may discourage, delay or prevent a merger or acquisition that stockholders may consider favorable. These provisions include those that:
• | authorize our board of directors to issue “blank check” preferred stock without stockholder approval; |
• | provide for a classified board of directors with staggered, three-year terms; |
• | require a super-majority vote in order to amend the provisions regarding our classified board of directors with staggered, three-year terms; and |
• | prohibit cumulative voting in the election of directors. |
These anti-takeover provisions could substantially impede the ability of stockholders to benefit from a change in control and, as a result, may adversely affect the market price of our common stock and your ability to realize any potential change of control premium.
The loss of key members of our senior management team could disrupt the management of our business.
We believe that our success depends on the continued contributions of the members of our senior management team, including our Chairwoman, Chief Executive Officer and principal stockholder. The loss of the services of our Chairwoman and Chief Executive Officer or one of our other executive officers or senior management members could impair our ability maintain good customer relations and to otherwise manage our business, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial performance and our ability to compete.
Our officers, certain of our directors and stockholders are affiliated with entities engaged in business activities similar to those conducted by us, which may compete directly with us, causing such persons to have conflicts of interest and conflicts in the allocation of their time to our business.
Our executive officers, certain of our directors and principal stockholders also serve as executive officers and/or directors in Navios Partners. Certain of our directors are also directors of other shipping companies and they may enter similar businesses in the future. These other affiliations and business activities may give rise to certain conflicts of interest in the course of such individuals’ affiliation with us. Although we do not prevent our directors, officers and principal stockholders from having such affiliations, we use our best efforts to cause such individuals to comply with all applicable laws and regulations in addressing such conflicts of interest. If the separate activities are significantly greater than our activities, there will be material competition for the time and effort of our officers who also provide services to Navios Partners and its respective affiliate companies. Our officers are not required to work full-time on our affairs and, in the future, we may have additional officers that also provide services to these entities. As such, these individuals have fiduciary duties to Navios Partners, which may cause them to pursue business strategies that disproportionately benefit Navios Partners or which otherwise are not in our best interests or those of our stockholders. Conflicts of interest may arise between Navios Partners, on the one hand, and us and our stockholders on the other hand. Based solely on the anticipated relative size of the fleet owned by the Navios Partners, over the next twelve months, we estimate that certain our officers may spend a substantial portion of their monthly business time dedicated to the business activities of the Navios Partners and its affiliate companies. However, the actual allocation of time could vary significantly from time to time depending on various circumstances and needs of the businesses, such as the relative levels of strategic activities of the businesses.
We are dependent on the Manager for administrative services.
Pursuant to the Administrative Services Agreement between us and the Manager, the Manager provides us significant administrative, financial and other support services. Our operational success and ability to execute our growth strategy will depend significantly upon the Manager’s satisfactory performance of these services. Our business will be harmed if the Manager fails to perform these services satisfactorily, if the Manager cancels either of these agreements, or if the Manager stops providing these services to us. Although we may have rights against the Manager if it defaults on its obligations to us, holders of our securities will have no recourse directly against it. Further, we expect that we will need to seek approval from our respective lenders to change our Manager. The Manager may have responsibilities and relationships to owners other than Navios Holdings that could create conflicts of interest between us and the Manager.
Our ability to expand our customer relationships will depend largely on the Manager and its reputation and relationships in the shipping industry. If the Manager suffers material damage to its reputation or relationships, it may harm our ability to:
• | obtain financing on commercially acceptable terms; or |
• | maintain satisfactory relationships with other third parties. |
If our ability to do any of the things described above is impaired, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Risks Relating to Navios Logistics’ Industry and Business
The international transportation industry is generally cyclical and volatile, and this may lead to volatility in, and reductions of, Navios Logistics’ vessel contract rates and volatility in its results of operations.
The international transportation industry is generally both cyclical and volatile, with frequent fluctuations in contract rates. The markets in which Navios Logistics operates are still developing and the nature of the industry’s cycle with respect to rates is difficult to determine, including the timing and amount of fluctuations in contract rates and spot market rates. Navios Logistics expects that its industry will exhibit significant cyclicality and volatility as it matures. The contract rates earned by the tankers in its cabotage business and barges and pushboats in its barge business will depend in part upon the state of the coastal and river markets at the time Navios Logistics seeks to charter them. Navios Logistics cannot control the forces affecting the supply and demand for these vessels or for the goods that they carry or predict the state of the respective markets on any future date.
10 |
Some of the factors that influence the demand for vessels include, but are not limited to:
• | global and regional production of, and demand for, dry bulk commodities, in particular, soybean and iron ore, and petroleum and refined petroleum products; |
• | the price of refined petroleum products, including the effects of existing or contemplated local government subsidies; |
• | regulations in the regions where we operate, including IMO regulations; |
• | embargoes and strikes; and |
• | changes in river, sea and other transportation patterns and the supply of and rates for alternative means of transportation. |
Some of the factors that influence the supply of vessels include, but are not limited to:
• | the number of newly constructed vessel deliveries in the area in which Navios Logistics operates; |
• | the scrapping rate of older vessels; |
• | the price of steel and other inputs; |
• | the number of vessels that are out of service at a given time; |
• | changes in licensing regulations and environmental and other regulations that may limit licenses, the useful life, carrying capacity or the operations of Navios Logistics’ fleet; and |
• | port or canal traffic and congestion. |
Further, public health or safety concerns and governmental restrictions, including those caused by outbreaks of pandemic diseases, such as the COVID-19 global pandemic, that cause Navios Logistics or its customers to suspend operations in affected areas, may impact both demand for, and supply of, Navios Logistics’ vessels in some of the countries in which they operate, or cause an economic downturn adversely affecting demand for its services.
Navios Logistics’ grain port business has seasonal components linked to the grain harvests in the region. At times throughout the year, the capacity of its Grain Port Terminal, including the loading and unloading operations, as well as the space in silos could be exceeded, which could materially and adversely affect its operations and revenues.
A significant portion of Navios Logistics’ grain port business is derived from handling and storage of soybeans and other agricultural products produced in the Hidrovia Region mainly during the season between April and September. This seasonal effect could, in turn, increase the inflow and outflow of barges and vessels in its dry port and cause the space in our silos to be exceeded, which in turn would affect our timely operations or our ability to satisfy the increased demand. Inability to provide services in a timely manner may have a negative impact on its clients’ satisfaction and result in loss of existing contracts or inability to obtain new contracts.
Navios Logistics is subject to certain operating risks in its Port terminal Business that could affect the performance of its contractual commitments, and in its barge and cabotage businesses including vessel breakdowns or accidents, which could result in a loss of revenue from the affected vessels, which could result in a loss of revenue and could have a material adverse effect on its results of operations or financial condition.
Navios Logistics operations are subject to a number of risks affecting its Port Terminal Business and the port facilities under development. These risks include, but are not limited to, mechanical and electrical failure, accidents, personal injury, loss or theft of cargo, or damage, fires, explosions, business interruption, political conditions and hostilities, labor strikes, adverse weather conditions such as floods, natural disasters, accidents on waterways or in coastal routes or accidents in its loading or unloading terminals, including environmental accidents and collisions, each of which could result in damages, penalties, fines, indemnities or costs payable to third parties and other claims against Navios Logistics. Further, public health or safety concerns and governmental restrictions, including those caused by outbreaks of pandemic disease such as the COVID-19 pandemic, may cause Navios Logistics to suspend operations in affected areas. Navios Logistics’ exposure to these operating risks in its existing port facilities may adversely affect its capacity to duly perform its contractual obligations under its take-or-pay contracts. In addition, these operating risks may result in additional repair costs for equipment, including cranes, conveyor belts, stacker-reclaimer, shiploaders, or piers, which are unpredictable and can be substantial. The loss of earnings while these damages are being repaired, as well as the actual cost of these repairs, could decrease Navios Logistics’ revenues and earnings substantially, particularly if this leads to a default under its contracts, which would materially affect its financial condition and results of operations.
11 |
Navios Logistics’ exposure to operating risks of vessel breakdown and accidents mainly arises in the context of its owned or bareboat chartered and operated vessels, including barges, tankers and pushboats. If any of the vessels in its fleet suffers damage, it may need to be repaired at a dry-docking facility. The costs of dry-docking are unpredictable and can be substantial. The loss of earnings while these vessels, barges and pushboats are being repaired and repositioned, as well as the actual cost of these repairs, could decrease Navios Logistics’ revenues and earnings substantially, particularly if a number of vessels, barges and pushboats are damaged or dry-docked at the same time. Most of the operating risks relating to vessels that Navios Logistics charters-in remain with their owners. If Navios Logistics charters-in a vessel or barge at a lower rate than the rate of hire Navios Logistics receives from a sub-charterer of such vessel, a breakdown or loss of the vessel due to an operating risk suffered by the owner will, in all likelihood, result in its loss of the positive spread between the two rates of hire. Breakdowns, accidents or dry-docking costs of its vessels and losses relating to chartered vessels that are not covered by insurance would result in a loss of revenue which may materially and adversely affect Navios Logistics’ financial condition and results of operations.
Navios Logistics derives a significant part of its revenues from a small number of customers, and the loss of one or more of these customers could materially and adversely affect its revenues.
In each of Navios Logistics’ businesses, a significant part of its revenues derives from a small number of customers. Navios Logistics expects that a small number of customers will continue to generate a substantial portion of its revenues in the future. For the year ended December 31, 2022, our largest customers, Vale International S.A. (“Vale”) and YPF SA (“YPF”) accounted for 21.0% and 13.2%, respectively, of our revenues, and our five largest customers accounted for approximately 55.5% of our revenues, with no such customer (other than Vale and YPF) accounting for greater than 10% of our revenues. For the year ended December 31, 2021, its largest customers, Vale and YPF accounted for 23.4% and 10.1% of its revenues and its five largest customers accounted for approximately 53.6% of its revenues, with no such customer (other than Vale and YPF) accounting for greater than 10% of its revenues. For the year ended December 31, 2020, its largest customer, Vale, accounted for 31.8% of its revenues and its five largest customers accounted for approximately 58.7% of its revenues, with no such customer (other than Vale) accounting for greater than 10% of its revenues. In addition, some of Navios Logistics’ customers, including many of its most significant customers, operate their own vessels and/or barges as well as port terminals and these customers may decide to cease or reduce the use of its services for various reasons, including utilizing their own vessels and/or port terminals. The loss of any of its significant customers, including its large take-or-pay customers, the change of the contractual terms of any one of its most significant take-or-pay contracts or any significant dispute with one of these customers could materially and adversely affect its financial condition and our results of operations.
If one or more of Navios Logistics’ customers does not perform under one or more contracts with it and Navios Logistics is not able to find a replacement contract, or if a customer exercises certain rights to terminate the contract, Navios Logistics could suffer a loss of revenues that could materially and adversely affect its business, financial condition and results of operations.
Navios Logistics could lose a customer or the benefits of a contract if, among other things:
• | the customer fails to make payments because of its financial inability, the curtailment or cessation of its operations, its disagreements with Navios Logistics or otherwise; |
• | the customer terminates the contract because Navios Logistics fails to meet its contracted storage needs and/or the contracted operational performance; |
• | the customer terminates the contract because Navios Logistics fails to deliver the vessel within a fixed period of time, the vessel is lost or damaged beyond repair, there are serious deficiencies in the vessel or prolonged off-hire, or a default under the contract; or |
• | the customer terminates the contract because the vessel has been subject to seizure for more than a specified number of days. |
The loss of any of its customers or a decline in payments under its contracts, could have a material adverse effect on its business, results of operations and financial condition, as well as its cash flows, or its ability to continue to service its indebtedness.
Navios Logistics could also become involved in legal disputes with customers relating to its contracts, including but not limited to Navios Logistics’ long-term take-or pay customers, be it through litigation, arbitration or otherwise, which could lead to delays in, or suspension or termination of its contracts and result in time-consuming, disruptive and expensive litigation or arbitration. If such contracts are suspended for an extended period of time, or if a number of Navios Logistics’ material contracts are terminated or renegotiated, its financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. Even if Navios Logistics prevails in legal disputes relating to its customer contracts, which could entitle it to compensation, Navios Logistics cannot provide any assurance that it would receive such compensation on a timely basis or in an amount that would fully compensate Navios Logistics for its losses.
12 |
Vale’s payments represent a significant portion of Navios Logistics’ revenue and if Vale were unable or unwilling to fulfill their obligations under the in-force agreements with Navios Logistics, it could significantly reduce Navios Logistics’ revenues and cash flow.
Vale’s payments, including in connection with the Vale port contract, to Navios Logistics represented approximately 21.0%, 23.4% and 31.8% of its revenue for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively. Reductions in the demand for or the oversupply of iron ore would place Vale under financial pressure and may increase the likelihood of Vale being unable or unwilling to pay Navios Logistics contracted rates or renew contracts upon termination.
If Vale were to terminate or not renew the Vale port contract, Navios Logistics may be unable to enter into new contracts under similarly favorable terms or at all.
In addition, the ability and willingness of Vale to perform its obligations under its port contract with Navios Logistics will depend upon a number of factors that are beyond Navios Logistics’ control and may include, among other things, general conditions of the Brazilian economy, general international economic conditions, the state of the capital markets, the condition of the commodities industry and charter hire rates. Should Vale fail to honor its obligations under the agreement with Navios Logistics, Navios Logistics could sustain significant losses, which in turn could have a material adverse effect on Navios Logistics’ business, results of operations and financial condition, as well as its cash flows. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Navios Logistics’ contract has dispute resolution clauses and protections that it may seek to enforce in such events. For example, on June 10, 2016, Navios Logistics initiated arbitration proceedings against Vale pursuant to the dispute resolution provisions of the Vale port contract. On December 20, 2016, the arbitration tribunal ruled that the Vale port contract remains in full force and effect, and if Vale were to further repudiate or renounce the contract, Navios Logistics may elect to terminate the contract and be entitled to damages calculated by reference to guaranteed volumes and agreed tariffs for the remaining period of the contract. As of the date hereof, no further claim has been made or received from Vale. Any litigation or arbitration proceeding would be costly and time consuming and may result in the deterioration of Navios Logistics’ commercial relationships with Vale.
In July 2022, Vale S.A. announced the closing of the sale of its iron ore, manganese ore and logistics assets in the midwestern system to J&F Mineracao Ltda., an entity controlled by J&F Investimentos S.A. The Vale port contract entered into between Corporacion Navios S.A., a company controlled by Navios Logistics, and Vale dated September 27, 2013, remains in full force and effect. Any transfer, novation, or assignment of the Vale port contract or any obligations or rights arising thereunder by Vale is subject to the prior approval of the Navios counterparty.
When Navios Logistics’ contracts expire, Navios Logistics may not be able to replace them.
The process for concluding contracts for Navios Logistics’ services, including port logistics services, vessel contracts and longer-term time charters generally involves a lengthy and intensive screening and vetting process and the submission of competitive bids. In addition to the quality and suitability of its ports and fleet, medium- and longer-term contracts tend to be awarded based upon a variety of other factors relating to the operator, including but not limited to:
• | environmental, health and safety record; |
• | compliance with regulatory industry standards; |
• | reputation for customer service, technical and operating expertise; |
• | shipping and port operating experience and quality of operations, including cost-effectiveness; |
• | construction management experience, including the ability to procure on-time delivery of vessels according to customer specifications; |
• | ability to negotiate contract terms, including those allocating operational risks; |
• | competitiveness of the bid in terms of overall price; and |
• | general reputation in the industry. |
13 |
As a result of these factors, when Navios Logistics’ contracts, including its long-term port contracts and charters, expire, Navios Logistics cannot provide any assurance that they will be able to successfully replace them promptly or at all or at rates sufficient to allow Navios Logistics to operate its business profitably or to meet its obligations, including payment of debt service to its noteholders or lenders. Navios Logistics’ ability to renew the contracts on its current or future vessels by the time of their expiration or termination, and the rates payable under any replacement contracts, will depend upon, among other things, economic conditions in the sectors in which its vessels operate at that time, changes in the supply and demand for vessel capacity and changes in the supply and demand for the transportation and storage of commodities as described above.
However, if Navios Logistics is successful in employing its vessels under longer-term contracts, its vessels will not be available for trading in the spot market during an upturn in the market cycle, when spot trading may be more profitable. If Navios Logistics cannot successfully employ its vessels with profitable contracts, its results of operations and operating cash flow could be materially and adversely affected.
Navios Logistics’ industry is highly competitive, and they may not be able to compete successfully for services with new companies with greater resources.
Navios Logistics provides services through its ports and employ its fleet in highly competitive markets. The river and coastal sea logistics market is international in scope and Navios Logistics competes with many different companies, including other port or vessel owners and major oil companies.
With respect to loading, storage and ancillary services, the market is divided between transits and exports, depending on the cargo origin. In the case of transits there are other companies operating in the river system that are able to offer services similar to those of Navios Logistics. With respect to exports, its competitors are Montevideo Port in Montevideo, Ontur and Terminales Graneleras Uruguayas S.A. (“TGU”) in Nueva Palmira.
The main competitor of its liquid port terminal in Paraguay is Petropar S.A. (“Petropar”), a Paraguayan state-owned entity. Other competitors include Copetrol S.A. (“Copetrol”), TLP Chartering (“TLP”), Petroleo Brasileiro S.A. (“Petrobras”), Trafigura Pte. Ltd. (“Trafigura”) and Monte Alegre S.A. (“Monte Alegre”).
Navios Logistics faces competition in its barge and cabotage businesses from other shipowners and from vessel operators. The charter markets in which its vessels compete are highly competitive. Key competitors include Atria Logistica S.A., Hidrovias do Brasil, Interbarge and P&O. In addition, some of its customers, including Archer Daniels Midland Company (“ADM”), Cargill International S.A. (“Cargill”), Louis Dreyfus Holding B.V. (“Louis Dreyfus’) and Vale Transbarge Navegacion S.A., have some of their own dedicated barge capacity, which they can use to transport cargo in lieu of hiring a third party. Navios Logistics also competes indirectly with other forms of land-based transportation such as truck and rail. These companies and other smaller entities are regular competitors of Navios Logistics in its primary trading areas. Competition is primarily based on prevailing market contract rates, vessel location and vessel manager know-how, reputation and credibility.
Our competitors may be able to offer their customers lower prices, higher quality service and greater name recognition than we do. Accordingly, we may be unable to retain our current customers or to attract new customers.
Navios Logistics’ business can be affected by adverse weather conditions, effects of climate change, public health concerns, and other factors beyond its control, which can affect production of the goods it transports and stores as well as the navigability of the river system on which it operates.
A significant portion of Navios Logistics’ revenue from its grain port business is derived from the handling and storage of soybeans and other agricultural products produced in the Hidrovia Region. Any drought or other adverse weather conditions, such as floods, could result in a decline in production of these products, which would likely result in a reduction in demand for the Navios Logistics’ services. A reduction in demand could have a negative impact on its results of operations and financial condition. Furthermore, Navios Logistics’ fleet operates in the Parana and Paraguay Rivers, and any changes adversely affecting navigability of either of these rivers, such as changes in the depth of the water or the width of the navigable channel, could, in the short-term, reduce or limit its ability to transport cargo effectively on the rivers. The possible effects of climate change, such as floods, low river-water levels, droughts or increased storm activity, could similarly affect the demand for its services or its operations.
A prolonged drought, the possible effects of climate change, widespread or prolonged public health concerns or other turns of events that are perceived by the market to have an impact on the region, the navigability of the Parana or Paraguay Rivers may, in the short-term, result in a reduction in the market value of its ports, barges and pushboats. For example, in 2021 and 2020, throughput of Navios Logistics’ grain port terminal decreased by 24.6% and 27.3%, respectively, compared to 2019 as a result of lower Uruguayan exports due to reduced Uruguayan soybean production and lower transshipment of grains from Paraguay and Bolivia due to difficult navigation conditions because of a prolonged period of unusually warm weather and a drought in southern Brazil, Paraguay and northern Argentina which resulted in water levels in the Paraná River dropping to their lowest levels in decades, for consecutive years. Such difficult conditions adversely affected Navios Logistics’ barge business through 2022 and 2021, as barges have limited capacity in reduced drafts and trips take longer to be completed, which resulted in increased voyage expenses. These barges and pushboats are designed to operate in wide and relatively calm rivers, of which there are only a few in the world. If it becomes difficult or impossible to operate profitably Navios Logistics’ barges and pushboats in the Hidrovia Region and Navios Logistics is forced to sell them to a third party located outside of the region, there is a limited market in which it would be able to sell these vessels, and accordingly it may be forced to sell them at a substantial loss, if at all. See “Item 5A. Operating Results—Overview—Factors Affecting Our Results of Operations—Weather Conditions”, as presented in Navios Logistics’ 20-F filed with SEC.
14 |
Delays, cancellations or non-completion of deliveries of purchased vessels, including second-hand and newbuilding vessels could have an adverse effect on Navios Logistics’ operating results.
Navios Logistics does not derive any revenue from a vessel until after its delivery and is required to pay substantial sums as progress payments during construction of a newbuilding or for the purchase of a secondhand vessel. In the event the vessel is not delivered by the shipyard or the seller is otherwise not accepted by Navios Logistics, Navios Logistics will not derive the revenues from such ship as they had planned and they may not be fully compensated under the construction agreement (and the related guarantees) with respect to such progress payments, or deposits paid to sellers, in which case Navios Logistics would lose the amounts they have advanced the seller or to the shipyards for such progress payments. In addition, if Navios Logistics enters into charterparties or contracts with its clients related to purchased vessels, if a shipbuilder or a seller fails to deliver the vessel as agreed, Navios Logistics may breach its obligations under such agreements with its customers. If Navios Logistics is in breach of those contracts, its customers may terminate them and, in addition to the resulting loss of revenues, Navios Logistics may be responsible for additional, substantial liquidated damages.
The completion and delivery of newbuildings could be delayed, canceled or otherwise not completed because of:
• | quality, design or engineering problems; |
• | changes in governmental regulations or maritime self-regulatory organization standards; |
• | work stoppages or other labor disturbances at the shipyard; |
• | bankruptcy or other financial crisis of the shipbuilder; |
• | a backlog of orders at the shipyard; |
• | political or economic disturbances; |
• | the impact of extraordinary external events, including the impact of global pandemics, and their collateral consequences, including labor shortages and government restrictions such as factory closures and restrictions on travel, resulting in the extended disruption of economic activity in the markets in which Navios Logistics operates; |
• | weather interference or catastrophic event, such as a major earthquake or fire; |
• | requests for changes to the original vessel specifications; |
• | shortages of or delays in the receipt of necessary construction materials, such as steel; |
• | inability to finance the construction or conversion of the vessels; or |
• | inability to obtain requisite permits or approvals. |
If delivery of a vessel is materially delayed, canceled or otherwise not completed, Navios Logistics’ future earnings could be materially and adversely affected.
Navios Logistics faces risks and costs associated with operation of ports and vessels, which risks and costs increase as the operational port equipment and vessels age.
The costs to operate and maintain a port or a vessel, increase with the age of the port equipment or the vessel. Governmental regulations, safety or other equipment standards related to the age of the operational port equipment or vessels may require expenditures for alterations or the addition of new equipment to Navios Logistics’ port equipment or vessels and may restrict the type of activities in which these ports or vessels may engage. The failure to make capital expenditures to alter or add new equipment to Navios Logistics’ barges, pushboats, vessels and/or ports may restrict the type of activities in which these barges, pushboats, vessels and/or ports may engage and may decrease their operational efficiency and increase its costs.
15 |
As charterers prefer newer vessels that are more fuel efficient than older vessels, the age of some of its vessels, barges and pushboats may make them less attractive to charterers. Cargo insurance rates also increase with the age of a vessel, making older vessels less desirable to charterers as well. The ages and rates at which risks and costs associated with vessels increase are dependent on numerous, complex factors and may vary substantially from vessel to vessel. Such factors include the condition of the vessel, the nature of the use of the vessel (including whether the vessel is used in fresh water, in which vessels typically have a longer a useful life, or salt water), whether various additional life-extending investments have been made in the vessel, any prior owner maintenance and operating practices, the nature of cargoes that could be carried, and the possibility that such vessels could be used in ports and docks, which could increase the wear on the vessel.
Navios Logistics cannot provide any assurance that as its operational port equipment and vessels barges and pushboats age, market conditions will justify those expenditures or enable Navios Logistics to operate them profitably during the remainder of their useful lives. If Navios Logistics sell such assets, they may have to sell them at a loss, or opt to scrap its assets, and if clients no longer use its ports or charter-out its vessels due to their age, its results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.
Spare parts or other key equipment needed for the operation of Navios Logistics’ ports and fleet may not be available off the shelf and Navios Logistics may face substantial delays in securing necessary parts or equipment. Failure to obtain necessary spare parts or key equipment in a timely manner could result in a loss of revenue.
Navios Logistics’ ports and its fleet may need spare parts in order to replace old or damaged parts in the normal course of their operations. Given the increased activity in the maritime industry and the manufacturing industry that supplies it, the manufacturers of key equipment for its vessels and its ports (such as engine makers, propulsion systems makers, control system makers and others) may not have the spare parts Navios Logistics require immediately available. In such circumstances, Navios Logistics may require a manufacturer to custom-produce equipment for them. In this case, its vessels and its ports may be unable to operate while waiting for such spare parts to be produced, delivered, installed and tested, resulting in a substantial loss of revenues for Navios Logistics.
Navios Logistics’ failure to receive required approvals for or timely complete construction and commence full operation and/or secure satisfactory commercial contracts of its new planned Port Murtinho Terminal and Nueva Palmira Free Zone port terminal facilities could negatively affect Navios Logistics’ business operations, and Navios Logistics may experience difficulty managing its growth as its expands its business.
Navios Logistics is currently developing a multipurpose upriver port terminal in Port Murtinho in the State of Mato Grosso do Sul, in the center-west region of Brazil, for exports of agricultural commodities and imports of fertilizers and fuel products. Since 2018, Navios Logistics has purchased a total of approximately 9.0 hectares of undeveloped land including river-front located in Port Murtinho, on which Navios Logistics expects to construct the new terminal. Navios Logistics has developed a master plan for the new terminal and concluded the licensing process for construction. The new terminal is still in the early stages of development, and there can be no assurance that it will be constructed.
Navios Logistics also has about 120 acres available to be developed inside or near the Nueva Palmira Free Zone in Uruguay. In part of this available land, Navios Logistics plans to develop a new terminal for liquid products. The new liquid terminal will service the market for the storage and transshipment of liquid products and the sale of fuel products within Nueva Palmira Free Zone for bunkering operations of vessels. There can be no assurance that Navios Logistics will obtain all necessary authorizations and permits, or that the new liquid terminal in Nueva Palmira will be constructed.
The available land in Brazil and Uruguay where Navios Logistics plans to develop the new terminals, requires authorizations and permits from several governmental authorities in order to do so. If these authorities deny Navios Logistics’ request for authorization, or if existing authorizations are revoked, Navios Logistics will not be able to proceed with construction. There is no assurance that such approvals will be obtained.
If Navios Logistics’ fails to secure commercial agreements with prospective clients to its satisfaction, Navios Logistics may decide to delay or not proceed with these investments. Further, there can be no assurance that Navios Logistics will complete the expected development of the new terminals or complete construction of the new terminals as scheduled or without cost overrun. Even if construction is completed on a timely basis, there can be no assurance that full operation of the new terminals will commence as expected. In addition, Navios Logistics may not be able to attract a sufficient number of skilled workers to meet the needs of the new terminals. If Navios Logistics experiences delays in construction or commencement of the full operations, increased costs or lack of skilled labor or other unforeseen events, its business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.
16 |
Rising crew costs, fuel prices and other cost increases may adversely affect Navios Logistics’ profits.
At December 31, 2022, Navios Logistics employed 412 land-based employees and 577 seafarers as crew on its vessels. Crew costs are a significant expense for Navios Logistics. Labor union activity in the Hidrovia Region may create pressure for Navios Logistics to pay higher crew salaries and wages. In addition, fuel is one of the largest voyage expenses in Navios Logistics’ barge and cabotage businesses, when the revenue is contracted mainly by ton per cargo shipped. The prices for and availability of fuel may be subject to rapid change or curtailment, respectively, due to, among other things, new laws or regulations, interruptions in production by suppliers, imposition of restrictions on energy supply by governments, worldwide price levels and market conditions. Currently, most of Navios Logistics’ long-term contracts provide for the adjustment of freight rates based on changes in the fuel prices and crew costs. Navios Logistics may be unable to include similar provisions in these contracts when they are renewed or in future contracts with new customers. To the extent Navios Logistics’ contracts do not pass-through changes in fuel prices to its clients, Navios Logistics will be forced to bear the cost of fuel price increases. Navios Logistics may hedge in the futures market all or part of its exposure to fuel price variations. Navios Logistics cannot provide you any assurance that it will be successful in hedging its exposure. In the event of a default by Navios Logistics’ contractual counterparties or other circumstance affecting their performance under a contract, Navios Logistics may be subject to exposure under, and may incur losses in connection with, its hedging instruments, if any. In certain jurisdictions, the price of fuel is affected by high local taxes and may become more expensive than prevailing international prices. Navios Logistics may not be able to pass onto its customers the additional cost of such taxes and may suffer losses as a consequence of such inability. Such increases in crew and fuel costs may materially and adversely affect Navios Logistics’ results of operations.
If Navios Logistics fails to fulfill the oil majors’ vetting processes, such failure could materially and adversely affect the employment of its tanker vessels in the spot and period markets, and consequently its results of operations.
The oil majors consider numerous factors in evaluating commercial decisions, and, through their association, OCIMF, have developed and are implementing two tools: (a) the Ship Inspection Report Program (“SIRE”) and (b) the Tanker Management and Self Assessment (“TMSA”) program. The former is a ship inspection based upon a thorough Vessel Inspection Questionnaire and performed by OCIMF-accredited inspectors, resulting in a report being logged on SIRE. The report is an important element of the ship evaluation undertaken by any oil major when a commercial need exists.
Based upon commercial needs, there are three levels of assessment used by the oil majors: (a) terminal use, which will clear a vessel to call at one of the oil major’s terminals, (b) voyage charter, which will clear the vessel for a single voyage and (c) term charter, which will clear the vessel for use for an extended period of time. While for terminal use and voyage charter relationships, a ship inspection and the operator’s TMSA will be sufficient for the evaluation to be undertaken, a term charter relationship also requires a thorough office audit. An operator’s request for such an audit is by no means a guarantee one will be performed; it will take a long record of proven excellent safety and environmental protection on the operator’s part as well as high commercial interest on the part of the oil major to have an office audit performed. If Navios Logistics fails to clear the vetting processes of the oil majors, it could have a material adverse effect on the employment of our vessels, and, consequently, on its results of operations.
A failure to pass inspection by classification societies could result in one or more vessels being unemployable unless and until they pass inspection, resulting in a loss of revenues from such vessels for that period and a corresponding decrease in operating Navios Logistics’ cash flows.
The hull and machinery of every commercial vessel with certain characteristics must be classed by a classification society that is authorized and is customarily a member of the International Association of Classification Societies Ltd. (“IACS”). The classification society must certify that a vessel has been built and maintained in accordance with the rules of such organization and complies with the applicable rules and regulations of the country whose flag such vessel flies and the international conventions of which that country is a member. The classification society certifies that a vessel is safe and seaworthy in accordance with the applicable rules and regulations of the country of registry of the vessel and with international conventions such as the United Nations Safety of Life at Sea Convention (“SOLAS”). Most of Navios Logistics’ owned fleet is currently enrolled with Lloyd’s Register of Shipping and RINA (Italian Naval Register).
Vessels, pushboats and barges must undergo an annual survey, an intermediate survey and a special survey. For certain vessels, in lieu of a special survey, a vessel’s machinery may be on a continuous survey cycle, under which the machinery and/or its hull would be surveyed periodically over a five-year period. Certain of its vessels are on continuous survey cycles for machinery inspection. Certain vessels are also required to be drydocked every two to three years on intermediate survey and every five years on special survey, while pushboats are required to be drydocked every six years on special survey for inspection of the underwater parts of such vessel and every three years for a floating intermediate survey and barges are required to be drydocked up to every eight years on special survey for inspection of the underwater parts of such vessel and every two years for a floating intermediate survey.
17 |
If any vessel fails any annual survey, intermediate survey or special survey, the vessel may be unable to trade between ports and, therefore, would be unemployable, potentially causing a material adverse effect on our revenues due to the loss of revenues from such vessel until it was able to trade again.
Navios Logistics’ vessels could be subject to seizure through maritime arrest or government requisition.
Crew members, suppliers of goods and services to a vessel, barge or pushboat, shippers of cargo, and other parties may be entitled to a maritime lien against a vessel for unsatisfied debts, claims or damages. In many jurisdictions, a maritime lien holder may enforce its lien by arresting the vessel or, under the “sister ship” theory of liability followed in some jurisdictions, arrest the vessel that is subject to the claimant’s maritime lien or any other vessel owned or controlled by the same owner. In addition, a government could seize ownership of one of Navios Logistics’ vessels or take control of a vessel and effectively become her charterer at charter rates dictated by the government. Generally, such requisitions occur during a period of war or emergency. The maritime arrest, government requisition or any other seizure of one or more of its vessels could interrupt our operations, reducing related revenue and earnings, and may require Navios Logistics to pay very large sums of money to have the arrest lifted.
The smuggling of drugs or other contraband onto Navios Logistics’ vessels may lead to governmental claims against us.
Navios Logistics’ vessels operate in South America where smugglers may attempt to hide drugs and other contraband on vessels, with or without the knowledge of crew members. Under some jurisdictions, the conveyance of illegal drugs in vessels could subject these vessels to forfeiture to the government of such jurisdiction. To the extent its vessels are found with contraband, whether inside or attached to the hull of its vessel and whether with or without the knowledge of any of its crew, Navios Logistics may face governmental or other regulatory claims, which could have a material adverse effect on its business, results of operations, cash flows and financial condition.
Navios Logistics may employ its fleet on the spot market and thus expose itself to risk of losses based on short-term decreases in shipping rates.
Navios Logistics periodically employs some of its fleet on a spot basis. The spot charter market can be competitive and freight rates within this market may be volatile with the timing and amount of fluctuations in spot rates being difficult to determine. Longer-term contracts provide income at pre-determined rates over more extended periods of time. Navios Logistics expects significant volatility in its target markets as the South American markets mature. Navios Logistics cannot provide any assurance that it will be successful in keeping its fleet fully employed in these short-term markets, or that future spot rates will be sufficient to enable such fleet to be operated profitably, as spot rates may decline below the operating cost of vessels. A significant decrease in spot market rates or its inability to fully employ its fleet by taking advantage of the spot market would result in a reduction of the incremental revenue received from spot chartering and could materially and adversely affect its results of operations, and operating cash flow.
Because the fair market values of vessels may fluctuate significantly, Navios Logistics may incur losses when they sell its vessels.
Vessel values have historically been highly volatile. The market value of Navios Logistics’ vessels may fluctuate significantly in the future, and they may incur losses when they sell vessels, which would adversely affect Navios Logistics’ financial condition and results of operations. Some of the factors that affect the fair market value of vessels, all of which are beyond its control, are:
• | prevailing level of vessel contract rates; |
• | number of newly constructed vessel deliveries; |
• | number of vessels scrapped or otherwise removed from the total fleet; |
• | changes in environmental and other regulations that may limit the useful life of vessels; |
• | changes in global and local commodity supply and demand; |
• | types and sizes of vessels; |
• | development and viability of other modes of transportation and increase in use of other modes of transportation; |
• | number of vessels of similar type and size currently on the market for sale; |
• | cost of newly constructed vessels; |
• | where the vessels were built and as-built specifications; |
18 |
• | the availability of financing or lack thereof for ordering newbuildings or for facilitating ship sale and purchase transactions; |
• | the cost of retrofitting or modifying existing vessels to respond to technological advances in vessel design or equipment, changes in applicable environmental or other regulations or standards, or otherwise; |
• | governmental or other regulations; and |
• | general economic and market conditions affecting the shipping industry. |
Navios Logistics’ industry has inherent operational risks that its insurance may not adequately cover.
The operation of vessels in international and regional trade is inherently risky. Not all risks may be adequately insured against and any particular claim may not be paid and any indemnification paid due to the occurrence of a casualty covered by Navios Logistics’ policies may not be sufficient to entirely compensate Navios Logistics for the damages suffered. Navios Logistics does not currently maintain loss of hire, credit risk or defense insurance, which would cover the loss of revenue if any of its contracts were terminated prior to their expiration, and its legal costs to recover related damages. Navios Logistics also does not maintain off-hire insurance, which would cover the loss of revenue during extended vessel off-hire periods, such as those that occur during an unscheduled drydocking due to damage to the vessel from accidents. Furthermore, Navios Logistics does not maintain strike insurance, which would protect them from loss of revenue due to labor disruptions, except at its dry and wet port terminals. Accordingly, any extended vessel off-hire, due to an accident, labor disruption or other reason, could have a material adverse effect on its business. Any claims covered by insurance would be subject to deductibles. As a result, if Navios Logistics files a large number of insurance claims, the aggregate amount of these deductibles could be material.
Navios Logistics may be unable to procure adequate insurance coverage for its fleet or port terminals at commercially reasonable rates in the future. For example, more stringent environmental regulations have led in the past to increased costs for, and in the future may result in the lack of availability of, insurance against risks of environmental damage or pollution. A catastrophic oil spill or marine disaster could exceed its insurance coverage, which could harm its business, financial condition and operating results. Changes in the insurance markets attributable to terrorist attacks may also make certain types of insurance more difficult for Navios Logistics to obtain. In addition, the insurance that may be available to Navios Logistics in the future may be significantly more expensive than its existing coverage.
Navios Logistics may not be able to timely obtain replacement vessels or other assets in the event of a loss. Furthermore, in the future, Navios Logistics may not be able to obtain adequate insurance coverage at reasonable rates for its fleet and port terminals. Navios Logistics’ insurance policies also contain deductibles, limitations and exclusions, which can result in significant increased overall costs to Navios Logistics.
Because Navios Logistics obtains some of its insurance through protection and indemnity associations, they may also be subject to calls, or premiums, in amounts based not only on its own claim records, but also on the claim records of all other members of the protection and indemnity associations.
Navios Logistics may be subject to calls, or premiums, in amounts based not only on its claim records but also on the claim records of all other members of the protection and indemnity associations through which Navios Logistics receives insurance coverage for tort liability, including pollution-related liability. Navios Logistics’ payment of these calls could result in significant expenses to them, which could have a material adverse effect on its business, results of operations and financial condition and its indebtedness.
Risks Relating to Navios Logistics’ Environmental Matters
Navios Logistics is subject to various laws, regulations, and international conventions, particularly environmental and safety laws that could require significant expenditures both to maintain compliance with such laws and to pay for any uninsured environmental liabilities including any resulting from a spill or other environmental incident, which could affect its cash flows and profit.
Vessel owners and operators are subject to government regulation in the form of international conventions, and national, state, and local laws and regulations in the jurisdictions in which their vessels operate, and in international waters, as well as in the country or countries where their vessels are registered. Such laws and regulations include those governing the management and disposal of hazardous substances and wastes, the cleanup of oil spills and other contamination, air emissions, discharges of operational and other wastes into the water, and ballast water management. In particular, ballast water management requirements will result in compliance costs relating to the installation of equipment on our vessels to treat ballast water before it is discharged and other additional ballast water management and reporting requirements. Investments in ballast water treatment may have a material adverse effect on Navios Logistics’ future performance, results of operations, cash flows and financial position.
19 |
Port State regulation significantly affects the operation of vessels, as it commonly is more stringent than international rules and standards. This is the case particularly in the United States and, increasingly, in Europe. Non-compliance with such laws and regulations can give rise to civil or criminal liability, and/or vessel delays and detentions in the jurisdictions in which Navios Logistics operates.
Navios Logistics’ vessels are subject to scheduled and unscheduled inspections by regulatory and enforcement authorities, as well as private maritime industry entities. This includes inspections by Port State control authorities, harbor masters or equivalent entities, classification societies, flag Administrations (country in which the vessel is registered), charterers, and terminal operators. Navios Logistics’ port terminals are subject to inspections by the National Board of Hidrografia and the Free Zone Authority in Uruguay and the Environmental Secretary in Paraguay. Certain of these entities require Navios Logistics to obtain permits, licenses and certificates for the operation of its vessels and port facilities. Failure to maintain necessary permits or approvals could result in the imposition of substantial penalties or require Navios Logistics to incur substantial costs or temporarily suspend operation of one or more of its vessels or port terminals.
Heightened levels of environmental and quality concerns among insurance underwriters, regulators, and charterers continue to lead to greater inspection and safety requirements on all vessels and may accelerate the scrapping of older vessels throughout the industry. Increasing environmental concerns have created a demand for vessels that conform to stricter environmental standards. Vessel owners are required to maintain operating standards for all vessels that will emphasize operational safety, quality, maintenance, continuous training of officers and crews, and compliance with local and international regulations.
The legal requirements and maritime industry standards to which Navios Logistics and its vessels are subject are set forth below, along with the risks associated therewith. Navios Logistics may be required to make substantial capital and other expenditures to ensure that Navios Logistics remains in compliance with these requirements and standards, as well as with standards imposed by its customers, including costs for ship modifications and changes in operating procedures. Navios Logistics also maintains insurance coverage against pollution liability risks for all of its vessels in the amount of $1.0 billion in the aggregate for any one event. The insured risks include penalties and fines, as well as civil liabilities and expenses resulting from accidental pollution. However, this insurance coverage is subject to exclusions, deductibles, and other terms and conditions. In addition, claims relating to pollution incidents for intentional or knowing violations of local environmental laws or the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships may be considered by Navios Logistics’ protection and indemnity associations on a discretionary basis only. If any liabilities or expenses fall within an exclusion from coverage, or if damages from a catastrophic incident exceed the aggregate liability of $1.0 billion for any one event, our cash flow, profitability and financial position could be adversely impacted.
Because international conventions, laws, regulations, and other requirements are often revised, Navios Logistics cannot predict the ultimate cost of compliance or the impact on the fair market price or useful life of its vessels, nor can Navios Logistics assure that its vessels will be able to attain and maintain certifications of compliance with various regulatory requirements.
Similarly, governmental regulation of the shipping industry, particularly in the areas of safety and environmental requirements, are expected to become stricter in the future. Navios Logistics believes that the heightened environmental, safety, quality, and security concerns of insurance underwriters, regulators, and charterers will lead to additional requirements, including enhanced risk assessment and security requirements, greater inspection and safety requirements, and heightened due diligence obligations. Navios Logistics also may be required to take certain of its vessels out of service for extended periods of time to address changing legal requirements, which would result in lost revenue. In the future, market conditions may not justify these expenditures or enable Navios Logistics to operate its vessels, particularly older vessels, profitably during the remainder of their economic lives. This could lead to significant asset write-downs.
Specific examples of expected changes that could have a significant, and potentially material, impact on Navios Logistics’ business include:
• | Further limitations on sulfur oxide and nitrogen oxide emissions from ships could cause increased demand and higher prices for low sulfur fuel due to supply constraints, as well as significant cost increases due to the implementation of measures such as fuel switching, vessel modifications such as adding distillate fuel storage capacity, or installation of exhaust gas cleaning systems or scrubbers; |
• | Environmental requirements can affect the resale value or useful lives of its vessels, require a reduction in cargo capacity, vessel modifications or operational changes or restrictions, lead to decreased availability of, or more costly insurance coverage for, environmental matters or result in the denial of access to certain jurisdictional waters or ports; |
• | Under local and national laws, as well as international treaties and conventions, Navios Logistics could incur material liabilities, including cleanup obligations and claims for natural resource damages, personal injury and/or property damages in the event that there is a release of petroleum or other hazardous materials from its vessels or otherwise in connection with its operations. |
For a more detailed discussion regarding the details of these international and domestic laws, see “Item 4.B. Information on the Company—Business Overview—REGULATION”, as presented in Navios Logistics’ 20-F filed with SEC.
20 |
Navios Logistics is subject to extensive environmental legislation, and if Navios Logistics or its subsidiaries do not comply with the applicable regulations, Navios Logistics’ business may be adversely affected.
If, during the course of its operations, any spillage of polluting products into the marine environment occurs, and the activities of one or more vessels are stopped, its business, results of operations, and reputation may be damaged.
In addition, new or more stringent environmental standards (including measures to address climate change) imposed on Navios Logistics could require additional investments that may vary widely from those currently planned, and, as a result, Navios Logistics may be adversely affected.
Navios Logistics may be liable for losses and damages to third parties, including environmental damages.
Environmental legislation in certain jurisdictions where Navios Logistics operates imposes strict civil liability on anyone who causes, directly or indirectly, environmental degradation. Therefore, the duty to repair or indemnify the damages caused to the environment and to affected third parties does not depend on intent or guilt, but rather on the existence of any damage as a result of the activity carried out. The payment of substantial environmental fines or charges may have a material adverse effect on Navios Logistics. Further, a single action can result in environmental liability in civil, criminal or administrative proceedings, or any combination thereof. The absence of responsibility in one of these spheres does not necessarily exempt the accused from responsibility in the others. Should Navios Logistics causes or otherwise be held responsible for any environmental damage, Navios Logistics may experience an adverse effect on its business and results of operation.
Navios Logistics may fail to comply with the conditions provided for under its environmental licenses.
Navios Logistics’ operations depend on environmental licensing granted by governmental authorities. Such licensing is usually subject to technical conditions that may involve limitations on its operations. Navios Logistics may fail to comply with the aforementioned conditions and become subject to fines or the revocation or suspension of its licenses, which have a material adverse effect on its results of operations.
Risks Relating to the Countries in which Navios Logistics’ Operates
Risks Relating to Argentina
Navios Logistics may be adversely affected by the economic, fiscal and political conditions of Argentina
Governmental actions in Argentina concerning the economy, including decisions with respect to inflation, interest rates, price controls, foreign exchange controls, devaluation, wages and taxes, restrictions on production, imports and exports, have had and could continue to have a material adverse effect on Navios Logistics. Navios Logistics cannot provide any assurance that future economic, social and political developments in Argentina, over which it has no control, will not impair its business, financial condition or results of operations.
21 |
Continuing inflation may have material adverse effects on the Argentine economy.
Argentina has faced and continues to face high inflationary pressures. According to official information published by the Argentine Statistics and Census Institute (Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Censos), the inter-annual inflation recorded for the years 2021 and 2022 reached 50.9% and 94.8%, respectively.
A high inflation economy could undermine Argentina’s cost competitiveness abroad if not offset by a devaluation of the Argentine peso, which could also negatively affect economic activity and employment levels. Freight under the contracts with clients from Navios Logistics’ Argentine subsidiary are denominated in U.S. dollars and are collected in Argentine pesos at the prevailing exchange rate. These contracts also include crew cost adjustment terms. Uncertainty about future inflation may contribute to slowdown or contraction in economic growth. Argentine inflation rate volatility makes it impossible to estimate with reasonable certainty the extent to which activity levels and results of operations of Navios Logistics’ Argentine subsidiary could be affected by inflation and exchange rate volatility in the future. There can be no assurance that inflation rates will not continue to escalate in the future or that the measures adopted or that may be adopted by the Fernandez administration to control inflation will be effective or successful.
Notwithstanding the high inflation as of December 31, 2022, we do not consider inflation to be a significant risk to our cost of doing business in the future as the functional currency of our Argentine subsidiary is the U.S. dollar. In addition, the day-to-day operations of our Argentine subsidiary are dependent on the relative value of the Argentine peso to the U.S. dollar.
The current and future foreign exchange policy of Argentina may affect the ability of Navios Logistics’ Argentine subsidiary to make money remittances outside of Argentina.
In Argentina, since the amendment of the Convertibility Act No. 23,928 by Act No. 25,561 in January 2002, the Argentine government has imposed several restrictions on the purchase of foreign currency in the exchange market and the transfer of funds outside of Argentina, substantially limiting the ability of companies to retain foreign currency or make payments abroad, including the distribution of dividends These controls and restrictions currently apply with respect to access to the Argentine foreign exchange market for purchase of foreign currencies, the payment of external financial debts, the payment of dividends and corporate profits, payments of imports of goods and services, among other things, and impose the obligation to repatriate and settle the proceeds from exports of goods and services in Argentine pesos. In addition, the Argentine Central Bank established certain regulations to avoid practices and transactions aimed to circumvent, through the use of securities and other instruments, the restrictions set forth by the current foreign exchange control regulations.
The Argentine government could maintain these exchange controls, impose new controls, strengthen transfer restrictions or impose other requirements that may impair the ability of our local subsidiaries to access the foreign exchange market, acquire U.S. dollars, or transfer funds abroad of Argentina. Any or all of these actions could materially affect the ability of the local subsidiaries to transfer funds abroad, and therefore affecting our ability to service our debt and satisfy our obligations.
22 |
The Argentine government has made certain changes to its tax rules that affected Navios Logistics’ operations in Argentina in the past, and could further increase the fiscal burden on its operations in Argentina in the future.
The Argentine government has made certain changes to its tax rules that affected Navios Logistics’ operations in Argentina in the past, and could further increase the fiscal burden on its operations in Argentina in the future. If the Argentine government decides to alter the tax regime in Argentina, its results of operations and financial condition of its Argentine subsidiary could be materially and adversely affected.
Fluctuations in the value of the Argentine peso could adversely affect the Argentine economy, and consequently Navios Logistics’ results of operations in Argentina or the financial condition of its Argentine subsidiary.
The Argentine peso has suffered significant devaluations against the U.S. dollar in the past and has continued to devalue against the U.S. dollar in 2023. According to Argentina’s Central Bank, the Argentine peso depreciated approximately 17.5% in 2017, 100.0% in 2018, 56.0% in 2019, 41% in 2020, 22.0% in 2021 and 73.0% in 2022.
The devaluation of the Argentine peso has had a negative impact on the ability of certain Argentine businesses to honor their foreign currency-denominated debt and has also led to very high inflation and significantly reduced real wages. If the Argentine peso is further significantly devalued, the Argentine economy and Navios Logistics’ business in Argentina could be adversely affected. As of September 2019, foreign currency controls have been reinstated in Argentina.
The success of any measures taken by the Argentine government to restore market confidence and stabilize the value of the Argentine peso is uncertain. Significant variations in the comparative value of the Argentine peso to the U.S. dollar could adversely affect Navios Logistics’ business in Argentina and the financial condition and results of operations of its Argentine subsidiary.
The Argentine economy could be adversely affected by economic developments in other global markets.
Argentina’s economy is vulnerable to external shocks that could be caused by adverse developments affecting its principal trading partners. A significant decline in the economic growth of any of Argentina’s major trading partners (including Brazil, the EU, China and the United States), including as a result of the Russian Ukraine war, could have a material adverse impact on Argentina’s balance of trade and could adversely affect Argentina’s economic growth. Argentina may also be affected by other countries that have influence over world economic cycles. If interest rates rise significantly in developed economies, including the United States, emerging market countries, whose economies, including Argentina, could find it increasingly challenging and expensive to borrow capital and refinance existing debt, which could negatively affect their economic growth.
Future policies of the Argentine government may affect the economy as well as Navios Logistics’ operations in Argentina.
During the past years, the Argentine government took several actions to re-nationalize concessions and public services companies that were privatized in the 1990’s, such as YPF, Aguas Argentinas S.A. and Aerolíneas Argentinas S.A. Future expropriations, nationalizations or requisitions, as well as changes in taxation, acts, regulations or policies affecting foreign trade, investment, or others that may be adopted could adversely affect Navios Logistics’ business in Argentina and the financial condition and results of operations of its Argentine subsidiary. For example, the Fernandez administration announced its intention to expropriate a seed trade company, and while certain initial steps were taken by the government, no further action was taken from the Argentine government to effect such expropriation.
Similar measures, such as mandatory renegotiation or modification of existing contracts among others, that may be adopted by the Argentine government in the future could also adversely affect Navios Logistics’ business in Argentina, financial condition and results of operations of our Argentine subsidiary.
23 |
Risks Relating to Uruguayan Free Zone Regulation
Navios Logistics may be materially and adversely affected by any termination, non-renewal or non-extension of the tax incentives that benefit certain of its subsidiaries in Uruguay.
Certain of Navios Logistics’ subsidiaries in Uruguay are operating as direct free trade zone users under free zone user agreements (the “Free Zone User Agreements”) with the Uruguayan Free Zones Department, formerly known as the Free Zones Division of the Uruguayan Department of Trade. The Free Zone User Agreements allow these subsidiaries to operate in isolated public areas in Nueva Palmira, Uruguay, and to enjoy tax exemptions and other benefits, such as a generic exemption on present and future Uruguayan national taxes including the Corporate Income Tax, Value-Added Tax and Wealth Tax. Other benefits that such subsidiaries enjoy are simplified corporate law provisions, the ability to negotiate preferential public utility rates with government agencies and government guarantees of maintenance of such benefits and tax exemptions. Free trade zone users do not need to pay import and export tariffs to introduce goods from abroad to the free trade zone, to transfer or send such goods to other free trade zones in Uruguay or send them abroad. These Free Zone Agreements have been extended to 2046 and may be extended further until 2066 at its option. In order to ensure the continuity of these incentives through the course of their terms, Navios Logistics’ subsidiaries must meet the Free Zone User Agreements or regulations governing free trade zones. However, its subsidiaries may lose all the tax benefits granted to them or be subject to fines if the Uruguayan Free Zones Department concludes that its subsidiaries breached or failed to comply with the Free Zone User Agreements or regulations governing free trade zones. As a result, we could be materially and adversely affected.
The following are some of the causes under which the Uruguayan Free Zones Department may terminate the Free Zone User Agreements prior to expiration: the non fulfilment of the obligations to improve the land, as per the terms of each Free Zone User Agreements; breaches of the terms of the Free Zone User Agreements or the Free Zone Act No. 15,921; violation of labor laws; failure to pay agreed fees to the Uruguayan authorities; failure to make required social security contributions; or the commission of illegal acts or acts expressly forbidden by the Free Zone User Agreements. Should such Uruguayan subsidiaries lose their free zone user status, they will not be able to operate as free zone users and therefore not able to operate their terminal facilities.
The right of the Uruguayan Free Zones Department to terminate the Free Zone User Agreements prior to the stated expiration date in the agreement is subject to an explanation on the specific factual and the legal basis for the early-termination decision. Not every breach by a free-zone user will entitle the Uruguayan Free Zones Department to terminate a Free Zone User Agreement prior to its stated expiration date. Such a decision must therefore be proportional to the degree of alleged noncompliance.
Navios Logistics can provide no assurance that the tax benefits and exemptions granted to Navios Logistics’ subsidiaries under the Free Zone User Agreements will be renewed after the expiration of the Free Zone User Agreements, that the Free Zone User Agreements will not be terminated prior to the agreed-upon expiration dates, or that, if renewed or otherwise replaced, the terms of any new Free Zone User Agreements will provide for equivalent or more favorable terms and conditions than those currently in effect. Navios Logistics will be materially and adversely affected if tax incentives that benefit its subsidiaries or the Free Zone User Agreements providing for such incentives are terminated and Navios Logistics is not able to renew or replace them. Even if the Free Zone User Agreements are renewed, if they provide for tax incentives that are not as favorable to Navios Logistics as those currently in effect, Navios Logistics’ financial condition and results of operations could suffer a material adverse effect.
Other Risks Relating to the Countries in which Navios Logistics’ Operates
Certain of the countries in which Navios Logistics operate or may in the future operate in have experienced, and may continue to experience or experience in the future, political, legal and economic instability. Its activities may be adversely affected by political or economic instability or changes in law relating to our industry. Navios Logistics operates in Argentina, Brazil, Uruguay, Paraguay and other markets. Navios Logistics can provide no assurance that changes in the governments or laws of the jurisdictions in which they operate or in the regulatory environment for its industry or for foreign-domiciled companies in such jurisdictions will not occur, or that such changes will not result in a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.
Navios Logistics is an international company, and as such is exposed to the risks of doing business in many different countries, including risks associated with operations in emerging market countries, whose economies, markets and legal systems may be less developed.
Navios Logistics is an international company and conducts all of its operations outside of the United States., and expects to continue doing so for the foreseeable future. These operations are performed in countries that are historically less developed and stable than the United States, such as Argentina, Brazil, Bolivia, Paraguay and Uruguay.
Some of the other risks Navios Logistics is generally exposed to through its operations in emerging market countries include among others:
• | political and economic instability, changing economic policies and conditions, and war and civil disturbances; |
• | recessions in economies of countries in which Navios Logistics has business operations; |
• | frequent government interventions into the country’s economy, including changes to monetary, fiscal and credit policy; |
• | the impact of extraordinary external events, such as pandemics, and their consequences, resulting in the disruption of economic activity in our markets; |
24 |
• | the imposition of additional withholding, income or other taxes, or tariffs or other restrictions on foreign trade or investment, including currency exchange controls and currency repatriation limitations; |
• | the modification of Navios Logistics’ status or the rules and regulations relating to the international tax-free trade zone in which it operates its dry port; |
• | the imposition of executive and judicial decisions upon Navios Logistics’ vessels by the different governmental authorities associated with some of these countries; |
• | the imposition of or unexpected adverse changes in foreign laws or regulatory requirements; |
• | longer payment cycles in foreign countries and difficulties in collecting accounts receivable; |
• | difficulties and costs of staffing and managing its foreign operations; |
• | compliance with anti-bribery laws; and |
• | acts of terrorism. |
These risks may result in unforeseen harm to Navios Logistics’ business and financial condition. Also, some of its customers are headquartered in South America, and a general decline in the economies of South America, or the instability of certain South American countries and economies, could materially and adversely affect Navios Logistics.
Navios Logistics’ business in emerging market countries requires it to respond to rapid changes in market conditions in these countries. Navios Logistics’ overall success in international markets depends, in part, upon its ability to succeed in different legal, regulatory, economic, social and political conditions. Navios Logistics may not continue to succeed in developing and implementing policies and strategies that will be effective in each location where it does business. Furthermore, the occurrence of any of the foregoing factors may have a material adverse effect on its business and results of operations.
Changes in rules and regulations with respect to cabotage or the interpretation of such rules and regulations in the markets in which Navios Logistics’ operate could have a material adverse effect on its results of operations.
In the markets in which Navios Logistics currently operates, in cabotage or regional trades, it is subject to restrictive rules and regulations on a region by region basis. Its operations currently benefit from these rules and regulations or their interpretation. For instance, preferential treatment is extended in Argentine cabotage for Argentine flagged vessels or foreign flagged vessels operated by local established operators with sufficient Argentine tonnage, in accordance with applicable local law, under one to three years’ licenses, including its Argentine cabotage vessels. Changes in cabotage rules and regulations or in their interpretation may have an adverse effect on Navios Logistics’ current or future cabotage operations, either by becoming more restrictive (which could result in limitations to the utilization of some of its vessels in those trades) or less restrictive (which could result in increased competition in these markets).
Because Navios Logistics generates the majority of its revenues in U.S. dollars but incurs a significant portion of its expenses in other currencies, exchange rate fluctuations could cause it to suffer exchange rate losses, thereby increasing expenses and reducing income.
Navios Logistics engages in regional commerce with a variety of entities. Navios Logistics’ revenues are predominantly U.S. dollar-denominated at the present. Additionally, Navios Logistics’ South American subsidiaries transact certain operations in Uruguayan pesos, Paraguayan guaraníes, Argentine pesos and Brazilian reais; however, all of the subsidiaries’ primary cash flows are U.S. dollar-denominated. Currencies in Argentina and Brazil have fluctuated significantly against the U.S. dollar in the past. As of December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020 approximately 60.1%, 50.8% and 47.8%, respectively, of its expenses were incurred in currencies other than U.S. dollars. Transactions in currencies other than the functional currency are translated at the exchange rate in effect at the date of each transaction. Expenses incurred in foreign currencies against which the U.S. dollar falls in value can increase, thereby decreasing Navios Logistics’ income. A greater percentage of Navios Logistics’ transactions and expenses in the future may be denominated in currencies other than U.S. dollars. As part of its overall risk management policy, Navios Logistics may attempt to hedge these risks in exchange rate fluctuations from time to time but cannot guarantee it will be successful in these hedging activities. Future fluctuations in the value of local currencies relative to the U.S. dollar in the countries in which it operates may occur, and if such fluctuations were to occur in one or a combination of the countries in which it operates, its results of operations or financial condition could be materially and adversely affected.
25 |
Risks Relating to Our Common Stock
Our stock price may be volatile, and investors in our common stock could lose all or part of their investment.
The following factors could cause the price of our common stock in the public market to fluctuate significantly:
• | variations in our quarterly and annual operating results, and shortfalls from levels forecasted by securities analysts; |
• | changes in market valuations of companies in our industry; |
• | fluctuations in the seaborne transportation industry; |
• | dividend distributions or lack thereof; |
• | fluctuations in stock market prices and volumes; |
• | changes in governmental regulations or maritime self-regulatory organization standards; |
• | general economic conditions; |
• | terrorist acts; |
• | investors’ perceptions of us; |
• | the general state of the securities markets; |
• | issuance of common stock or other securities in the future; |
• | the addition or departure of key personnel; |
• | announcements by us or our competitors of new business or trade routes, acquisitions or mergers and strategic alliances in the shipping industry; and |
• | the other factors discussed elsewhere in this Annual Report. |
Securities markets worldwide are experiencing significant price and volume fluctuations. The market price for our securities may also be volatile. This market volatility, as well as general economic, market or political conditions, could reduce the market price of our securities in spite of our operating performance. Consequently, this may prevent investors from being able to sell their common stock at or above the price an investor pays for our common stock in an offering.
You may experience future proportionate ownership dilution as a result of future equity offerings, and other issuances of our common stock, preferred stock or other securities, including stock issued for debt repayment purposes or otherwise.
Concurrently with the refinancing of the NSM Loans (as defined herein), we entered into a convertible debenture with NSM (the “Convertible Debenture”), covering certain payments under the loans. NSM has the option to convert any portion of the principal outstanding balance into shares of common stock in accordance with a contractually determined formula. The maximum number of shares of our common stock issuable to NSM is 35.5 million shares. Please refer also to Note 16 “Transactions with Related Parties” and Note 17 “Preferred and Common Stock”), included elsewhere in this Annual Report.
In order to raise additional capital, including to support our growth plans, to repay indebtedness, or otherwise, we may issue additional equity securities, including preferred stock, or other securities convertible into or exchangeable for our common stock, including convertible debt. We cannot predict the size of future issuances or sales of our common or preferred stock, including those made in connection with debt repayment purposes, or the effect, if any, that such issuances or sales may have on the market price of our common stock. The issuance and sale of substantial amounts of common stock, could adversely affect the market price of our common stock, and will dilute the proportionate ownership interests of our existing stockholders, and decrease the relative voting strength of each previously outstanding common share held by our existing stockholders.
Holders of our common stock have no preemptive rights that entitle such holders to purchase their pro rata share of any offering of shares of any class or series and, therefore, such sales or offerings will result in increased dilution to our stockholders.
The NYSE may delist our securities from quotation on its exchange, which could limit the ability of our securityholders to trade our securities and subject us to additional trading restrictions.
Our securities are listed on the NYSE, a national securities exchange. The NYSE minimum listing standards require that we meet certain requirements relating to stockholders’ equity, number of round-lot holders, market capitalization, aggregate market value of publicly held shares and distribution requirements. For example, on April 18, 2018, we were notified by the NYSE that we were no longer in compliance with the NYSE’s continued listing standards because the average closing price of our common stock over a consecutive 30 trading-day period was less than $1.00 per common share. Although we regained compliance on January 3, 2019, following a reverse split of our stock, we cannot provide any assurance that our securities will continue to be listed on NYSE in the future. If NYSE delists our securities from trading on its exchange, we could face significant material adverse consequences, including:
• | a limited availability of market quotations for our securities; |
26 |
• | a limited amount of news and analyst coverage for us; |
• | a decreased ability for us to issue additional securities or obtain additional financing in the future; |
• | limited liquidity for our stockholders due to thin trading; and |
• | loss of preferential capital gain tax rates for certain dividends received by certain non-corporate U.S. holders and loss of “mark-to-market” election by U.S. holders in the event we are treated as a passive foreign investment company (“PFIC”). |
Changing laws and evolving reporting requirements could have an adverse effect on our business, including the pending SEC Environmental, Social and Governance (“ESG”) disclosure rules in the U.S. and European Union.
Changing laws, regulations and standards relating to reporting requirements, including the European Union General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”), GHG and additional climate disclosure rules proposed by the SEC in March 2022 and expected to be finalized in 2023, along with other anticipated ESG reporting rules which are expected in 2023, may create additional compliance requirements for us. We may receive pressure from investors, lenders and other market participants, who are focused on climate change, to prioritize sustainable energy practices, reduce our carbon footprint and promote sustainability. To maintain high standards of corporate governance and public disclosure, we have invested in, and intend to continue to invest in, reasonably necessary resources to comply with evolving standards.
Companies that do not adapt to, or comply with, investor, lender, or other industry shareholder expectations and standards which are evolving, or which are perceived to have not responded appropriately to the growing concern for ESG issues, regardless of whether there is a legal requirement to do so, may suffer from reputational damage and the business, financial condition, and/or stock price of such a accompany could be materially and adversely affected.
Risks Relating to Our Series G and Series H and the Depositary Shares
Our Series G and Series H are represented by the Depositary Shares. The Depositary Shares are subordinated to our debt obligations, and the interests of a holder of Series G, Series H or Depositary Shares could be diluted by the issuance of additional shares, including additional Series G or Series H or by other transactions.
Our Series G, with a liquidation preference of $2,500.00 per share and our Series H, with a liquidation preference of $2,500.00 per share (the Series G and the Series H together referred to as the “Series G and H”), both represented by American Depositary Shares (the “Depositary Shares”), are subordinated to all of our existing and future indebtedness. As of December 31, 2022, our total debt was $686.8 million. We may incur substantial additional debt from time to time in the future, and the terms of the Series G and H do not limit the amount of indebtedness we may incur. In February 2016, we announced the suspension of payment of quarterly dividends on our common stock and on the Series G and Series H. The payment of principal and interest on our debt reduces cash available for distribution to us and on our shares, including the Series G and H and the Depositary Shares, should such dividends be reinstated. We currently have no plans or intention to pay dividends on the Series G or Series H.
The issuance of additional preferred stock on a parity with or senior to our Series G and H would dilute the interests of the holders of our Series G and H, and any issuance of any preferred stock senior to or on parity with our Series G and H or additional indebtedness could affect our ability to pay dividends on, redeem or pay the liquidation preference on our Series G and H. No provisions relating to our Series G and H protect the holders of our Series G and H in the event of a highly leveraged or other transaction, including a merger or the sale, lease or conveyance of all or substantially all our assets or business, which might adversely affect the holders of our Series G and H.
Our Series G and H will rank pari passu with any other class or series of our capital stock established after the original issue date of the Series G and H that is not expressly subordinated or senior to the Series G and H (“Parity Securities”) as to the payment of dividends and amounts payable upon liquidation or reorganization. If less than all dividends payable with respect to the Series G and H and any Parity Securities are paid, any partial payment shall be made pro rata with respect to shares of Series G and H and any Parity Securities entitled to a dividend payment at such time in proportion to the aggregate amounts remaining due in respect of such shares at such time.
27 |
We may not have sufficient to enable us to pay dividends on or to redeem our Series G and H, and accordingly the Depositary Shares, as the case may be, following the payment of expenses and the establishment of any reserves.
In February 2016, we announced the suspension of payment of quarterly dividends on the Series G and Series H, and have not made a quarterly dividend payment on the Series G or Series H since then, and as a result the respective dividend rates increased by 0.25%. We will reinstate and pay quarterly dividends on the Series G and H, and accordingly the Depositary Shares, only from funds legally available for such purpose when, as and if declared by our board of directors. We may not have sufficient cash available to reinstate such dividend or to pay dividends each quarter if and when reinstated. We currently have no plans or intention to pay dividends on the Series G or Series H. In addition, we may have insufficient cash available to redeem the Series G and H, and accordingly the Depositary Shares. The amount of cash we can use to pay dividends or redeem our Series G and H and the Depositary Shares depends upon the amount of cash we generate from our operations, which may fluctuate significantly, and other factors, including the following:
• | changes in our operating cash flow, capital expenditure requirements, working capital requirements and other cash needs; |
• | the amount of any cash reserves established by our board of directors; |
• | restrictions under our credit facilities and other instruments and agreements governing our existing and future debt, including restrictions under our existing credit facilities and indentures governing our debt securities (other than the indenture governing 9.75% Senior Notes due 2024 (the “2024 Notes”) on our ability to pay dividends if an event of default has occurred and is continuing, or if the payment of the dividend would result in an event of default, and on our ability to redeem equity securities; |
• | restrictions under Marshall Islands law as described below; and |
• | our overall financial and operating performance, which, in turn, is subject to prevailing economic and competitive conditions and to the risks associated with the shipping industry, our dry bulk operations and the other factors described herein, many of which are beyond our control. |
The amount of cash we generate from our operations may differ materially from our net income or loss for the period, which will be affected by noncash items, and our board of directors in its discretion may elect not to declare any dividends. We may incur other expenses or liabilities that could reduce or eliminate the cash available for distribution as dividends. As a result of these and the other factors mentioned above, we may pay dividends during periods when we record losses and may not pay dividends during periods when we record net income.
Our ability to pay dividends on and to redeem our Series G and H, and therefore holders’ ability to receive payments on the Depositary Shares, is limited by the requirements of Marshall Islands law.
If we reinstate the payment of dividends, Marshall Islands law provides that we may pay dividends on and redeem the Series G and H only to the extent that assets are legally available for such purposes. Legally available assets generally are limited to our surplus, which essentially represents our retained earnings, if any, and the excess of consideration received by us for the sale of shares above the par value of the shares. In addition, under Marshall Islands law we may not pay dividends on or redeem Series G and H if we are insolvent or would be rendered insolvent by the payment of such a dividend or the making of such redemption.
The Series G and H represent perpetual equity interests.
The Series G and H represent perpetual equity interests in us and, unlike our indebtedness, will not give rise to a claim for payment of a principal amount at a particular date. As a result, holders of the Series G and H (and accordingly the Depositary Shares) may be required to bear the financial risks of an investment in the Series G and H (and accordingly the Depositary Shares) for an indefinite period of time. In addition, the Series G and H will rank junior to all our indebtedness and other liabilities, and any other senior securities we may issue in the future with respect to assets available to satisfy claims against us.
28 |
Holders of Depositary Shares have extremely limited voting rights. The voting rights of holders of Depositary Shares are more limited than the voting rights of holders of the Series G and H. Holders of Depositary Shares may encounter difficulties in exercising some of such voting rights.
Voting rights of holders of Depositary Shares will be extremely limited. Our common stock is the only class of stock carrying full voting rights. Holders of the Series G and H, and accordingly holders of the Depositary Shares, generally have no voting rights. In February 2016, we announced the suspension of payment of quarterly dividends on the Series G and Series H. As such, (i) we have used commercially reasonable efforts to obtain an amendment to our articles of incorporation to effectuate any and all such changes thereto as may be necessary to permit either the Series G Preferred Shareholders or the Series H Preferred Shareholders, as the case may be, to exercise the voting rights described in the following clause (ii)(x), and (ii) if and when dividends payable on either the Series G or the Series H, as the case may be, are in arrears for six or more quarterly periods, whether or not consecutive (and whether or not such dividends shall have been declared and whether or not there are profits, surplus, or other funds legally available for the payment of dividends), then (x) if our articles of incorporation have been amended as described in the preceding clause (i), the holders of Series G or the holders of Series G, as the case may be, will have the right (voting together as a class with all other classes or series of parity securities upon which like voting rights have been conferred and are exercisable), to elect one additional director to serve on our board of directors, and the size of our board of directors will be increased as needed to accommodate such change (unless the size of our board of directors already has been increased by reason of the election of a director by holders of securities on parity with either the Series G or Series H, as the case may be, upon which like voting rights have been conferred and with which the Series G and H voted as a class for the election of such director), and (y) if our articles of incorporation have not been amended as described in the preceding clause (i), then, until such amendment is fully approved and effective, the dividend rate on the Series G or the Series H, as the case may be, shall increase by 25 basis points. At our respective Annual Meeting of stockholders held on December 15, 2016, December 15, 2017 and December 21, 2018, the Company proposed an amendment to our articles of incorporation to effectuate any and all such changes as were necessary to permit the Series G and/or Series H holders the ability to exercise the certain voting rights described above. These proposals failed to receive the affirmative vote of holders of two-thirds of the Company’s issued and outstanding common stock entitled to vote at the respective Annual Meeting, which was required to approve the proposal. Therefore, since the proposals failed and the dividends for the Series G and Series H are in arrears for six or more quarterly periods the dividend rate on the Series G and Series H have increased by 25 basis points respectively. There can be no assurance that any such further proposal to our stockholders to amend our articles of incorporation will be approved by our common stockholders.
Furthermore, holders of the Depositary Shares may encounter difficulties in exercising any voting rights acquired by the Series G or the Series H for as long as they hold the Depositary Shares rather than the Series G or the Series H. For example, holders of the Depositary Shares will not be entitled to vote at meetings of holders of Series G or of the Series H, and they will only be able to exercise their limited voting rights by giving timely instructions to CITIBANK, N.A. (the “Depositary”) in advance of any meeting of holders of Series G or the Series H, as the case may be. On March 29, 2021, we entered into an amended and restated deposit agreement with the Depositary, whereby the Depository succeeded The Bank of New York Mellon as depositary of the Depositary Shares. The Depositary will be the holder of the Series G or the Series H underlying the Depositary Shares and holders may exercise voting rights with respect to the Series G or the Series H represented by the Depositary Shares only in accordance with the deposit agreement (the “Deposit Agreement”) relating to the Depositary Shares. To the limited extent permitted by the Deposit Agreement, the holders of the Depositary Shares should be able to direct the Depositary to vote the underlying Series G or the Series H, as the case may be, in accordance with their individual instructions. Nevertheless, holders of Depositary Shares may not receive voting materials in time to instruct the Depositary to vote the Series G or the Series H, as the case may be, underlying their Depositary Shares. In addition, the Depositary and its agents are not responsible for failing to carry out voting instructions of the holders of Depositary Shares or for the manner of carrying out such instructions. Accordingly, holders of Depositary Shares may not be able to exercise voting rights, and they will have little, if any, recourse if the underlying Series G or the Series H, as the case may be, is not voted as requested.
The Depositary Shares lack a well-developed trading market. Various factors may adversely affect the price of the Depositary Shares.
Even though the Depositary Shares are listed on the NYSE, there may be little or no secondary market for the Depositary Shares, in which case the trading price of the Depositary Shares could be adversely affected and a holder’s ability to transfer its securities will be limited. The Depositary Shares may trade at prices lower than the offering price and the secondary market may not provide sufficient liquidity. In addition, since the Series G and Series H do not have a stated maturity date, investors seeking liquidity in the Depositary Shares will be limited to selling their Depositary Shares in the secondary market absent redemption by us. We do not expect that there will be any other trading market for the Series G and Series H except as represented by the Depositary Shares.
Other factors, some of which are beyond our control, will also influence the market prices of the Depositary Shares. Factors that might influence the market prices of the Depositary Shares include:
• | whether we are able to reinstate dividends on the Series G and Series H; |
• | the market for similar securities; |
• | our issuance of debt or preferred equity securities; |
• | our creditworthiness; |
• | our financial condition, results of operations and prospects; and |
• | economic, financial, geopolitical, regulatory or judicial events that affect us or the financial markets generally. |
Accordingly, the Depositary Shares that an investor purchases may trade at a discount to their purchase price.
29 |
Depositary Shares became less liquid following the Exchange Offer and Tender Offer.
During March and April 2019, Navios Holdings exchanged cash and/or 2024 Notes for 10,930 Series H and 8,841 Series G, respectively. In addition, as of the completion of Navios Holdings’ tender offer (“Tender Offer”) on October 21, 2022, a total of 20,185 Series G ADSs and a total of 584,158 Series H ADSs were validly tendered in exchange for cash. Following consummation of the Exchange Offer and Tender Offer, the number of Depositary Shares that are publicly traded has been reduced and the trading market for the remaining outstanding Depositary Shares may be less liquid and market prices may fluctuate significantly depending on the volume of trading in the Depositary Shares. Therefore, holders whose Depositary Shares were not repurchased will own a greater percentage interest in the remaining outstanding Depositary Shares following consummation of the Exchange Offer. This reduced the volume of trading and make it more difficult to buy or sell significant amounts of Depositary Shares without affecting the market price. Decreased liquidity may make it more difficult for holders of Depositary Shares to sell their Depositary Shares.
The Series G and H represented by the Depositary Shares have not been rated, and ratings of any other of our securities may affect the trading price of the Depositary Shares.
We have not sought to obtain a rating for the Series G and H, and both stocks may never be rated. It is possible, however, that one or more rating agencies might independently determine to assign a rating to either the Series G or the Series H or that we may elect to obtain a rating of either our Series G or the Series H in the future. In addition, we have issued securities that are rated and may elect to issue other securities for which we may seek to obtain a rating. Any ratings that are assigned to the Series G or the Series H in the future, that have been issued on our outstanding securities or that may be issued on our other securities, if they are lower than market expectations or are subsequently lowered or withdrawn, could imply a lower relative value for the Series G or the Series H and could adversely affect the market for or the market value of the Depositary Shares of the Series G and H Preferred Shares respectively. Ratings only reflect the views of the issuing rating agency or agencies and such ratings could at any time be revised downward or withdrawn entirely at the discretion of the issuing rating agency. A rating is not a recommendation to purchase, sell or hold any particular security, including the Series G and H and the Depositary Shares. Ratings do not reflect market prices or suitability of a security for a particular investor and any future rating of the Series G and H and the Depositary Shares may not reflect all risks related to us and our business, or the structure or market value of the Series G and H and the Depositary Shares.
The amount of the liquidation preference of our Series G and H is fixed and holders will have no right to receive any greater payment regardless of the circumstances.
The payment due upon liquidation for both our Series G and H is fixed at the liquidation preference of $2,500.00 per share (equivalent to $25.00 per Depositary Share) plus accumulated and unpaid dividends to the date of liquidation (whether or not declared). If in the case of our liquidation, there are remaining assets to be distributed after payment of this amount, holders will have no right to receive or to participate in these amounts. Furthermore, if the market price for the Series G or the Series H, as the case may be, is greater than the liquidation preference, holders will have no right to receive the market price from us upon our liquidation.
The Series G and H are redeemable only at our option and investors should not expect us to redeem either the Series G or the Series H on the dates they respectively become redeemable or at any time afterwards.
We may redeem, at our option, all or from time to time part of the Series G or the Series H. If we redeem the Series G, holders of the Series G will be entitled to receive a redemption price equal to $2,500.00 per share (equivalent to $25.00 per Depositary Share) plus accumulated and unpaid dividends to the date of redemption (whether or not declared). If we redeem the Series H, holders of the Series H will be entitled to receive a redemption price equal to $2,500.00 per share (equivalent to $25.00 per Depositary Share) plus accumulated and unpaid dividends to the date of redemption (whether or not declared). Any decision we may make at any time to propose redemption of either the Series G or the Series H will depend upon, among other things, our evaluation of our capital position, the composition of our shareholders’ equity and general market conditions at that time. In addition, investors might not be able to reinvest the money they receive upon redemption of the Series G or the Series H, as the case may be, in a similar security or at similar rates. We may elect to exercise our partial redemption right on multiple occasions.
30 |
Holders of Depositary Shares may be subject to additional risks related to holding Depositary Shares rather than holding shares directly.
Because holders of Depositary Shares do not hold their shares directly, they are subject to the following additional risks, among others:
• | a holder of Depositary Shares will not be treated as one of our direct shareholders and may not be able to exercise shareholder rights; |
• | distributions on the Series G and H represented by the Depositary Shares will be paid to the Depositary, and before the Depositary makes a distribution to holder on behalf of the Depositary Shares, withholding taxes or other governmental charges, if any, that must be paid will be deducted; |
• | we and the Depositary may amend or terminate the Deposit Agreement without the consent of holders of the Depositary Shares in a manner that could prejudice holders of Depositary Shares or that could affect their ability to transfer Depositary Shares, among others; and |
• | the Depositary may take other actions inconsistent with the best interests of holders of Depositary Shares. |
Risks Relating to Navios Logistics’ Indebtedness
Navios Logistics has substantial debt and may incur substantial additional debt, which could adversely affect its financial health and its ability to obtain financing in the future, react to changes in the business and make payments on the 2025 Notes and our other obligations.
At December 31, 2022, Navios Logistics had approximately $559.4 million in aggregate principal amount of debt outstanding.
Navios Logistics’ substantial debt could have important consequences to our business, including the following:
• | its ability to obtain additional financing for working capital, capital expenditures, debt service requirements, vessel or other acquisitions or general corporate purposes and its ability to satisfy its obligations with respect to the 2025 Notes may be impaired in the future, or such financing may not be available on favorable terms; |
• | a substantial portion of its cash flow from operations must be dedicated to the payment of principal and interest on its indebtedness, thereby reducing the funds available to them for other purposes; |
• | it may be more difficult for them to satisfy its obligations to its lenders and noteholders, resulting in possible defaults on and acceleration of such indebtedness; |
• | Navios Logistics may be more vulnerable to general adverse economic and industry conditions; |
• | Navios Logistics may be at a competitive disadvantage compared to its competitors with less debt or comparable debt at more favorable interest rates, who may be better positioned to withstand economic downturns; |
• | its ability to refinance indebtedness may be limited or the associated costs may increase; and |
• | its flexibility to adjust to changing market conditions and ability to withstand competitive pressures could be limited, or Navios Logistics may be prevented from carrying out capital spending that is necessary or important to its growth strategy and efforts to improve operating margins or its business. |
Its ability to service its debt will depend upon, among other things, its future financial and operating performance, which will be affected by prevailing economic conditions and financial, business, regulatory and other factors, some of which are beyond its control. If its operating results are not sufficient to service its current or future indebtedness, Navios Logistics will be forced to take actions such as reducing or delaying its business activities, acquisitions, investments or capital expenditures, selling assets, restructuring or refinancing our debt, or seeking additional equity capital or bankruptcy protection. Navios Logistics may not be able to effect any of these remedies on satisfactory terms, or at all.
Further, Navios Logistics and its subsidiaries may be able to incur substantial additional indebtedness in the future. The agreements governing the terms of our indebtedness permit them to incur substantial additional indebtedness in accordance with the terms of such agreements. Navios Logistics also may incur new indebtedness if they expand its business or purchase new vessels or for other purposes. Any secured indebtedness permitted under the 2025 Notes would be effectively senior to the 2025 Notes to the extent of the value of the assets securing such indebtedness, as would all indebtedness of non-guarantor subsidiaries. If new debt is added to its current debt levels, the related risks that Navios Logistics now face would increase and Navios Logistics may not be able to meet all of its debt obligations, including the repayment of the 2025 Notes. In addition, the indenture governing the 2025 Notes does not prevent them from incurring obligations that do not constitute indebtedness as defined therein.
31 |
The agreements and instruments governing Navios Logistics’ debt contain restrictions and limitations that could have a significant negative impact on its ability to operate its business.
The indenture governing the 2025 Notes imposes significant operating and financial restrictions on them, including those that limit its ability to engage in actions that may be in its long-term interests. These restrictions, among others, may limit our ability to:
• | incur guarantees or additional indebtedness; |
• | create certain liens on our assets; |
• | make investments; |
• | engage in mergers and acquisitions and sell all or substantially all of its properties or assets; |
• | pay dividends or redeem capital stock; |
• | create or permit restrictions on the ability of its restricted subsidiaries to pay dividends or make other distributions to them; |
• | engage in sale and leaseback transactions; |
• | sell vessels or other assets; |
• | change the flag, class or commercial and technical management of its vessels that constitute collateral under the 2025 Notes; and |
• | transfer or sell any of its vessels that constitute collateral under the 2025 Notes. |
Therefore, Navios Logistics may be restricted from engaging in some corporate and commercial actions that they believe would be in the best interest of its business, which may make it difficult for them to successfully execute its business strategy or effectively compete with companies that are not similarly restricted. Any future credit agreement or other indebtedness may include similar or more restrictive provisions.
Navios Logistics are required to comply with the covenants contained in the indenture governing the 2025 Notes. In addition, its future credit agreements may require that Navios Logistics maintain other specific financial covenants. Navios Logistics may be required to take action to reduce its debt or to act in a manner contrary to its business objectives to meet these ratios and satisfy these covenants and ratios. Events beyond its control, including changes in the economic and business conditions in the markets in which Navios Logistics operate, may affect its ability to comply with these covenants. Navios Logistics cannot provide any assurance that they will meet these ratios or satisfy these covenants or that its lender will waive any failure to do so. A breach of any of the covenants in, or its inability to maintain the required financial ratios under, its credit agreements would prevent them from borrowing additional money under the facilities and could result in a default under them.
The 2025 Notes are secured by: (i) first priority ship mortgages on four tanker vessels servicing its Cabotage Business (the Elena H, Makenita H, Sara H and He Man H) that are owned by certain subsidiary guarantors (such guarantors, the “Mortgaged Vessel Guarantors”), and related assignments of earnings and insurance, together with a first priority lien on the capital stock of each Mortgaged Vessel Guarantor; and (ii) an assignment by way of security of the Vale port contract (collectively, the “Collateral”). Its future debt is likely to be secured by mortgages on its vessels, barges or ports, vessels under construction pursuant to ship-building contracts, guarantees by its subsidiaries and/or other related assets, such as assignments of insurances and earnings or some combination of the foregoing. If a default occurs under the 2025 Notes or future credit facilities, the lenders could elect to declare such debt, together with accrued interest and other fees and expenses, to be immediately due and payable and foreclose on the collateral, including its vessels, barges, ports or other assets securing that debt. In a case where a credit facility was used to finance the scheduled payments as they come due under shipbuilding contracts, such a default could result in default by us under the associated ship-building contract and possible foreclosure of its rights in the related vessel under construction. In addition, a payment default under a ship-building contract would give the shipyard the right to terminate the contract without any further obligation to finish construction and may give it rights against them for having failed to make the required payments.
Any loss of vessels or assets could significantly decrease its ability to generate positive cash flow from operations and, therefore, to service its debt. Moreover, if the holders of the 2025 Notes or lenders under a credit facility or other agreement in default were to accelerate the debt outstanding under that facility, it could result in a cross default under other debt. If all or part of its debt were to be accelerated, Navios Logistics may not have or be able to obtain sufficient funds to repay it upon acceleration. This could have serious consequences to its financial condition and results of operations and could cause them to become bankrupt or insolvent. Its ability to comply with these covenants in future periods will also depend substantially on the value of its assets, its success at keeping its costs low, its ability to implement its overall business strategy, and its charter rates. Any future credit agreement or amendment may contain similar covenants, or covenants that are more restrictive.
32 |
Navios Logistics’ ability to generate the significant amount of cash needed to service its debt obligations and its ability to refinance all or a portion of its indebtedness or obtain additional financing depends on many factors, many of which may be beyond its control.
Navios Logistics’ ability to make scheduled payments on, or to refinance its obligations under, its debt, will depend on its financial and operating performance, which, in turn, will be subject to prevailing economic and competitive conditions and to the financial and business factors, many of which may be beyond its control. Navios Logistics cannot provide any assurance that its business will generate sufficient cash flow from operations, that currently anticipated business opportunities will be realized on schedule or at all, or that future borrowings will be available to them in amounts sufficient to enable them to service its indebtedness and any amounts borrowed under future credit facilities, or to fund our other liquidity needs.
Navios Logistics will use cash to pay the principal and interest on its debt. These payments limit funds otherwise available for working capital, capital expenditures, vessel acquisitions and other purposes. As a result of these obligations, its current liabilities may exceed its current assets. Navios Logistics may need to take on additional debt as they expand its fleet or port terminals, which could increase its ratio of debt to equity. The need to service its debt may limit funds available for other purposes and its inability to service debt in the future could lead to acceleration of its debt and foreclosure on its owned vessels.
Navios Logistics cannot provide any assurance that they will be able to refinance any of its indebtedness or obtain additional financing, particularly because of its anticipated high levels of indebtedness and the indebtedness incurrence restrictions imposed by the agreements governing our indebtedness, as well as prevailing market conditions. Navios Logistics could face substantial liquidity problems and might be required to dispose of material assets or operations to meet its indebtedness service and other obligations.
The indenture governing the 2025 Notes restricts, and any agreements governing future indebtedness may restrict, its ability to dispose of assets and use the proceeds from any such dispositions. Navios Logistics cannot provide any assurance that there will be able to consummate any asset sales, or if we do, what the timing of the sales will be or whether the proceeds that they realize will be adequate to meet indebtedness service obligations when due.
Navios Logistics is subject to volatility in interest rates, including SOFR, under its debt obligations, which could affect its profitability, earnings and cash flow.
The publication of LIBOR is expected to be discontinued imminently. The U.S. banking agencies issued guidance instructing banks to cease entering into new contracts referencing LIBOR no later than December 31, 2021, with certain exceptions. The Federal Reserve Bank of New York now publishes the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”) based on overnight U.S. Treasury repurchase agreement transactions, which has been recommended as the alternative to U.S. dollar LIBOR by the Alternative Reference Rates Committee convened by the Federal Reserve and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. Accordingly, the method and rate used to calculate our interest rates and/or payments on its floating-rate debt in the future may result in interest rates and/or payments that are higher than, or that do not otherwise correlate over time with, the interest rates and/or payments that would have been applicable to its obligations if LIBOR was available in its current form, which could have a material adverse effect on its financial position, results of operations and liquidity.
Certain of its loans have a floating rate based on SOFR, which has increased recently after a long period of relative stability at historically low levels, and has been volatile in past years, which can affect the amount of interest payable on its debt, and which, in turn, could have an adverse effect on our profitability, earnings and cash flow.
The market values of Navios Logistics’ vessels may fluctuate significantly, which could cause Navios Logistics to be in breach of certain debt covenants that currently has or debt covenants that it may incur in the future.
Factors that influence vessel values include:
• | prevailing level of vessel contract rates; |
• | number of newly constructed vessel deliveries; |
• | number of vessels scrapped or otherwise removed from the total fleet; |
• | governmental and other regulations and changes in environmental and other regulations that may limit the useful life of vessels; |
• | changes in global commodity supply and demand; |
• | types and sizes of vessels; |
33 |
• | development and viability of other modes of transportation and increase in use of other modes of transportation; |
• | number of vessels of similar type and size currently on the market for sale; |
• | lifetime maintenance records; |
• | technological advances; |
• | where the vessels were built and as-built specification; |
• | the availability of finance or lack thereof for ordering newbuildings or for facilitating ship sale and purchase transactions; |
• | the cost of retrofitting or modifying existing vessels to respond to technological advances in vessel design or equipment, changes in applicable environmental or other regulations or standards, or otherwise; |
• | cost of newly constructed vessels; |
• | governmental or other regulations; and |
• | general economic and market conditions affecting the shipping industry. |
If the market values of its owned vessels decrease, Navios Logistics may breach covenants contained in any existing or future credit facility. If Navios Logistics breaches such covenants and is unable to remedy any relevant breach, its lenders could accelerate its debt and foreclose on that debt. Any loss of vessels would significantly decrease its ability to generate positive cash flow from operations and, therefore, service its debt. In addition, if the book value of a vessel is impaired due to unfavorable market conditions, or a vessel is sold at a price below its book value, Navios Logistics would incur a loss.
Navios Logistics may be unable to raise funds necessary to finance the change of control repurchase offer required by the indenture governing the 2025 Notes.
If Navios Logistics experience specified changes of control, they would be required to make an offer to repurchase all of the 2025 Notes (unless otherwise redeemed) at a price equal to 101% of the principal amount thereof plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the repurchase date. The occurrence of specified events that would constitute a change of control could constitute a default under its existing or future indebtedness. Such indebtedness would be immediately due and payable in an event of default, including due to a change of control. As a result, following a change of control event, Navios Logistics would not be able to repurchase 2025 Notes unless Navios Logistics first repays any of our other indebtedness that contains such provisions, or obtain a waiver from the holders of such indebtedness to permit them to repurchase the 2025 Notes. Navios Logistics may be unable to repay all of that indebtedness or obtain a waiver of that type.
Any requirement to offer to repurchase outstanding 2025 Notes may therefore require them to refinance its other outstanding debt, which Navios Logistics may not be able to do on commercially reasonable terms, if at all. In addition, its failure to purchase the 2025 Notes after a change of control in accordance with the terms of the indenture would constitute an event of default under the indenture, which in turn may result in a default under its other indebtedness.
Its inability to repay certain indebtedness will also constitute an event of default under the indenture governing the 2025 Notes, which could have materially adverse consequences to them and its investors. In the event of a change of control, Navios Logistics cannot provide any assurance that Navios Logistics would have sufficient assets to satisfy all of its obligations under any such indebtedness and the 2025 Notes. If Navios Logistics is unable to fulfill such debt obligations it could materially and adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
The international nature of Navios Logistics’ operations may make the outcome of any insolvency or bankruptcy proceedings or other exercise of remedies outside of bankruptcy difficult to predict.
Navios Logistics is incorporated under the laws of the Republic of the Marshall Islands and is subsidiaries are incorporated under the laws of the Republic of the Marshall Islands, Panama, Uruguay, Argentina, Paraguay, Brazil and the British Virgin Islands, and Navios Logistics conduct operations in South America. Consequently, in the event of any bankruptcy, insolvency or similar proceedings involving them or one of our subsidiaries, bankruptcy laws other than those of the United States could apply. Navios Logistics has limited operations or assets in the United States. If Navios Logistics becomes a debtor under the U.S. bankruptcy laws, bankruptcy courts in the United States may seek to assert jurisdiction over all of its assets, wherever located, including property situated in other countries. There can be no assurance, however, that Navios Logistics would become a debtor in the United States or that a U.S. bankruptcy court would be entitled to, or accept, jurisdiction over such bankruptcy case or that courts in other countries that have jurisdiction over them and its operations and assets would recognize a United States bankruptcy court’s jurisdiction if any other bankruptcy court would determine it had jurisdiction.
34 |
Further, in the event of a liquidation, bankruptcy or judicial reorganization in certain jurisdictions including Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay and Uruguay, certain statutory preferences, including post-petition claims, claims for salaries, wages, social security, taxes, court fees and expenses and claims secured by collateral, among others, will have preference over any other claims, including claims by any investor or creditor. In such event, enforcement of its obligations may be unsuccessful and the value of our common shares may deteriorate substantially or entirely.
The 2025 Notes are guaranteed by guarantors organized under the laws of different countries. The rights of the 2025 Noteholders under the guarantees are thus subject to the laws of these jurisdictions, and Navios Logistics can provide no assurance that the 2025 Noteholders will be able to enforce their rights in multiple bankruptcy, insolvency or similar proceedings or outside of bankruptcy. Moreover, such multi-jurisdictional proceedings are typically complex and costly for creditors and often result in substantial uncertainty and delay in the enforcement of rights of holders.
In addition, the bankruptcy, insolvency, administrative, creditors right and other laws of the various jurisdictions of organization may be materially different from, in conflict with or less favorable than, each other and those of the United States in certain areas, including creditors’ rights, priority of creditors, the ability to obtain post-petition interest, fees and expenses or adequate protection and the duration of the insolvency proceeding. The application of these various laws in multiple jurisdictions could trigger disputes over which jurisdiction’s law should apply and could adversely affect the ability of the holders of our outstanding indebtedness to enforce their rights and to collect payment on such indebtedness and materially and adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
Panama
Under Panamanian bankruptcy laws, Panamanian courts would not agree to hear any bankruptcy arising from activities in another country other than Panama. If there is a bankruptcy proceeding against a Panamanian corporation operating in another country, it will be the bankruptcy courts of that country which will be competent to hear the bankruptcy proceeding.
Any judgment issued by a court of competent jurisdiction with respect to a Panamanian corporation operating outside Panama may be enforceable in Panama by registering such judgment with the Supreme Court in Panama.
Uruguay
Uruguayan courts are competent to consider bankruptcy cases where the debtor is domiciled in Uruguay, when the center of activity of the debtor is in Uruguay or when the debtor has or had an office, permanent establishment or exploitation in Uruguay.
If the guarantors, or any of the creditors of the guarantors, file a petition for bankruptcy in Uruguay, Uruguayan bankruptcy law will apply except for the impact of the bankruptcy declaration on the contracts that are validly governed by a foreign law.
Uruguayan and foreign creditors have the same treatment in case of bankruptcy, except in case of labor credits with general privilege which will receive preferential treatment over the assets of the debtor located in Uruguay.
Upon a court declaration of bankruptcy, all the debtor’s assets, either located within Uruguayan territory or abroad, will be placed under the control of a receiver to be appointed for the benefit of all creditors. In some cases, after a bankruptcy court declaration, the bankrupt party may continue to manage its assets with the supervision of a receiver. Otherwise, the receiver will run the business and manage the bankrupt party.
In addition to the above, certain transactions occurring prior to the declaration of bankruptcy may be found by the court to be null and void, such as:
• | contracts entered into for no proper consideration executed within the previous two years of the court declaration of bankruptcy; |
• | any mortgage or pledge of any assets granted to secure prior and pending obligations with a creditor, or to secure a new obligation assumed with the same creditor immediately after the former obligation is cancelled, if the encumbrance is granted within six months of the court declaration; |
• | any payments made to a creditor for obligations that are not yet due, if the payment was completed within six months of the court declaration; and |
• | cancellation of contracts executed within six months of the court declaration. |
35 |
In addition, upon the petition of the receiver (or in subsidy, by creditors representing 5% of the debtor’s total liabilities), the court may nullify transactions entered into up to two years prior to the entry into the bankruptcy if it is concluded that they were entered into with a malicious intent (fraud) to prevent creditors from satisfying their bona fide claims and the contracting party knew or should have known that the party facing the bankruptcy was insolvent or had suspended payments on its obligations. In case of transaction with parties related to the debtor, the knowledge of the insolvency of the debtor by the contracting party is assumed. Companies of the same group are considered by bankruptcy law as related parties.
Clawback actions become time barred two years after the declaration of bankruptcy but there are other fraudulent conveyance actions available to creditors that are not subject to such statute of limitations.
Argentina
Under Argentine law, in the event that a guarantor becomes subject to a reorganization proceeding or to bankruptcy, the relevant guarantee, if granted within a maximum of two years before the date of declaration of bankruptcy or the date of initiation of the reorganization proceeding (if it is an indirect bankruptcy), may be deemed to have been a fraudulent transfer null and void if certain circumstances are met, such as the case in which the guarantor did not receive a fair consideration in exchange for the granting of such guarantee. The validity and enforceability of the guarantee granted by a guarantor that is an Argentine entity requires the guarantee to be granted in the best interest of the Argentine guarantor and that the Argentine guarantor is authorized by its by-laws to provide guarantees and receives fair and adequate consideration for the granting of the guarantee.
Argentine law establishes rankings of privileges and priorities among creditors in order to receive payment in a reorganization proceeding or bankruptcy subject to the nature and cause of their credits (claims for salaries, wages, social security contributions, taxes, among others, will take priority over any claims, both secured and unsecured).
In addition, under Argentine law, a guarantee is considered accessory to the principal obligation. Therefore, in case our underlying obligations under the 2025 Notes are declared null, the guarantees would, under Argentine law, be deemed to be null as well.
If proceedings were brought in the courts of Argentina seeking to enforce its obligations Navios Logistics would not be required to discharge its obligations in the original currency of the obligations. Any judgment obtained against us in Argentine courts in respect of any payment of its obligations could be discharged solely in Argentine pesos equivalent to the U.S. dollar amount of such payment at the official certain exchange rate. There can be no assurance that such rates of exchange will afford its investors or creditors full compensation of the amount invested in or loaned to them nor that the currency exchange regulations will permit investors or creditors to convert any amount of Argentine pesos received into U.S. dollars. See “—Risks Relating to Argentina—The current and future foreign exchange policy of Argentina may affect the ability of its Argentine subsidiary to make money remittances outside of Argentina.”
Paraguay
Bankruptcy proceedings in Paraguay may be less favorable to holders of its 2025 Notes than in other jurisdictions. For example, Paraguayan creditors receive preferential treatment, which means that creditors resident in Paraguay would receive payments prior to any payment being made on the guarantees. Furthermore, the obligations under the guarantees would be subordinated to certain statutory preferences such as maritime privileges, amongst which are claims for salaries, wages, taxes, port facilities and others.
Brazil
Brazilian legal framework for economically distressed companies or individuals generally consists of the provisions set forth by the Brazilian Bankruptcy and Reorganization Federal Law (“BBRL”—Law No. 11101, dated February 9, 2005, as amended by Federal Law 14,112/2020, sets out the rules for bankruptcy and insolvency in Brazil). The BBRL contains certain provisions that resemble the insolvency procedures regulated by US Bankruptcy Code under Chapters 11 and 7. It regulates two different situations: (i) reorganization, that may take place (a) in court (judicial reorganization) or (b) out of court (extrajudicial reorganization), both aiming at surpassing debtor’s temporary financial distress; and (ii) bankruptcy liquidation, which is intended to liquidate the company and its assets and must be always administered by a court appointed trustee.
A bankruptcy liquidation request can be filed by the company itself, its shareholders or partners, or any of its creditors. BBRL lists the events upon which bankruptcy liquidation may be requested by a company’s creditors, including the following: (i) company’s failure to provide payment of any liquid obligation when owed under a credit instrument in an amount higher than 40 Brazilian minimum monthly wages; (ii) company arbitrarily anticipating the liquidation of assets or making payments in a damaging or fraudulent way; (iii) company attempting or actually performing fraudulent deals or sales of all or substantially all assets to a third party, creditor or otherwise; and (iv) transfer of company’s establishment to third parties, creditors or otherwise, without the consent of all other creditors and without keeping sufficient assets to fulfill its obligations. A bankruptcy liquidation order entails two important matters concerning credits: (i) acceleration of all company’s indebtedness, and (ii) conversion of foreign currency-denominated debts into national currency ones, based on the bankruptcy liquidation decree exchange rate.
36 |
Any judgment obtained against Navios Logistics in Brazilian courts in respect of any payment obligations normally would be expressed in the Brazilian currency equivalent of the U.S. dollar amount of such sum at the exchange rate in effect (i) on the date of actual payment, (ii) on the date on which such judgment is rendered, or (iii) on the date on which collection or enforcement proceedings are started against us. Consequently, in the event of bankruptcy, all of its debt obligations that are denominated in foreign currency will be converted into Brazilian currency at the prevailing exchange rate on the date of declaration of our bankruptcy by the court. In bankruptcy liquidation proceedings, creditors would be paid in accordance with the priority rule set forth by the BBRL. Finally, payments under bankruptcy liquidation proceedings in Brazil usually occur within two to 12 years after the filing of the proceeding, and the assets are generally not sufficient to pay off all of the creditors.
Certain requirements must be met for the recognition and enforceability of a foreign judgment by courts outside the United States.
Most of Navios Logistics’ directors and officers, selling shareholders and experts reside outside the United States, and most of their assets are located outside the United States. As a result, it may be difficult to effect service of process within the United States upon these persons or to enforce outside the United States judgments obtained against them or these persons in U.S. courts, including judgments in actions predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the U.S. federal securities laws, or to otherwise bring original actions in foreign courts to enforce such liabilities. Likewise, it may also be difficult to enforce judgments obtained in non-U.S. courts against us or against these persons, in U.S. court, including judgments obtained in actions predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the U.S. federal securities laws. It may also be difficult for an investor to bring an action in a Brazilian court predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the U.S. federal securities laws against them or these persons. Although a person may bring an original or derivative action against them or its affiliates in the courts of the Republic of the Marshall Islands, and the courts of the Republic of the Marshall Islands may impose civil liability, including monetary damages, against them or its affiliates for a cause of action arising under Republic of the Marshall Islands law, it may impracticable for an individual investor to do so.
Panama
Foreign judgments would be recognized and enforced in Panama by the Supreme Court, provided that the requirements of Article 1419 of the Judicial Code of the Republic of Panama are met. Article 1419 establishes that judgments issued by foreign courts as well as foreign arbitral awards will be effective in accordance with the respective agreements or treaties. If there are no special treaties with the country in which the judgment has been issued, the judgment can be executed in Panama, unless there is proof that the country does not recognize judgments issued by Panamanian courts. If the judgment comes from a country in which awards or judgments issued by Panamanian courts are not recognized, then the judgment will not be recognized in Panama. Without prejudice to what is established in special treaties, no foreign judgment will be executed in Panama unless it complies with the following requisites: (1) that the judgment be issued as a consequence of a personal action, provided what it is specially stipulated by the law in testamentary successions in foreign countries; (2) that the judgment has not been issued in contumacy, contempt of court or default, it being understood, that the lawsuit has not been personally served or notified to the defendant, being said personal service of process ordered by the competent court, unless the defendant in contumacy requests its execution; (3) that the obligation contained in the judgment be licit in Panama; and (4) that the copy of the judgment be authentic. Judgment means the decision granting the claim.
Uruguay
The enforcement of foreign judgments, including judgments of a court in the United States, will be recognized and enforced in Uruguay without review of its merits provided the following requirements are met:
• | the foreign judgment shall meet the formal requirements necessary for it to be considered authentic in the jurisdiction where it was rendered (i.e. notarization, legalization and/or apostille as the case may be); |
• | the foreign judgment and any relevant documents should be duly legalized or apostilled in the country where the decision was issued and translated into Spanish (if necessary) by a duly authorized Uruguayan translator; |
• | the judgment shall have been rendered by a court with international jurisdiction to hear the matter pursuant to its own law and the matter should not be one in which Uruguayan Courts enjoy exclusive jurisdiction; |
• | the defendant must have been properly served notice of the proceeding and granted a reasonable opportunity to defend and present its case; |
• | the judgment must be final (“res judicata”) in the country where it was issued and must have complied with all formalities required for the enforceability under the laws of the country where it was issued; and; |
• | the decision shall not violate Uruguayan international public policy principles (orden publico internacional). |
37 |
For the purposes of enforcement and collection in Uruguay, the request for recognition (“exequatur”) shall be first filed before the Supreme Court of Justice in Uruguay, who shall verify compliance with the aforementioned requirements. Service of notice shall be given on the defendant who will have 20 days to file its objection to the application for recognition. The Supreme Court’s decision shall be final and cannot be challenged later.
If enforcement is granted, the file will be sent to the competent lower court to carry out proceedings for enforcement and collection. Upon completion of the Exequatur proceeding as described above, it will be possible to enforce the judgment, without the need to appoint any agent for service of process.
Argentina
A final and conclusive foreign judgment would be recognized and enforced by the courts in Argentina without any retrial or re-examination of the merits of the original action provided that the requirements of Sections 517 through 519 of the Argentine National Code of Civil and Commercial Procedures (if enforcement is sought before federal courts) are met. These requirements include: (1) the judgment, which must be final in the jurisdiction where rendered, must have been issued by a court competent pursuant to Argentine principles regarding international jurisdiction and must have resulted from a personal action, or an in rem action with respect to personal property if such property was transferred to Argentine territory during or after the prosecution of the foreign action, (2) the defendant against whom enforcement of the judgment is sought must have been personally served with the summons and, in accordance with due process of law, must have been given an opportunity to defend itself against such foreign action, (3) the judgment must be valid in the jurisdiction where rendered and its authenticity must be established in accordance with the requirements of Argentine law, (4) the judgment must not violate the principles of public policy of Argentine law, and (5) the judgment must not be contrary to a prior or simultaneous judgment of an Argentine court. There might be other requirements set forth by laws that replace or complement the National Code of Civil and Commercial Procedures in the future. If the enforcement is sought before provincial courts, other requirements may apply through application of the corresponding provincial codes of procedures.
In addition, Section 2609 of the Argentine Civil and Commercial Code, sets forth the exclusive jurisdiction of Argentine courts on disputes related to (i) rights in rem over real estate located in Argentina, (ii) validity or nullity of registrations performed before an Argentine public registry, and (iii) registration and validity of intellectual property rights.
Navios Logistics has been advised that there is doubt as to the enforceability in Argentina, in original actions or in actions for enforcement of judgments of United States courts, of civil liabilities predicated solely upon the federal securities laws of the United States.
Moreover, court costs, including (without limitation) filings fees and deposits to secure judgments, and the payment of stamp taxes may be required by the competent authorities in Argentina in case a foreign judgment has effects in Argentina, upon, for instance, re-litigation, enforcement or registration of such judgment in Argentina.
Paraguay
Foreign judgments have force in Paraguay provided that: (1) the judgment was obtained in an action in personam; (2) the defendant must have been personally served with the summons and given an opportunity to defend against foreign action (3) the obligation on which the action was based is valid in accordance with Paraguay’s law; (4) the decision is final; (5) proper certification and legalization is complied with in accordance with Paraguay law; (6) the judgment has not been pronounced by default of condemned party; (7) the judgment does not violate Paraguayan law principles of public policy, and (8) the judgment is not contrary to a prior or simultaneous judgment by a Paraguayan court.
Brazil
Judgments of Brazilian courts enforcing obligations under the guarantees would be payable only in Brazilian currency. If a plaintiff were to bring proceedings against Navios Logistics in the courts of Brazil seeking to enforce the obligations under the guarantees, Navios Logistics would not be required to discharge our obligations in a currency other than Brazilian currency. Any judgment obtained against us in Brazilian courts in respect of any payment obligations under the guarantees would be payable in Brazilian currency. Navios Logistics cannot provide any assurance that this amount in Brazilian currency will afford a plaintiff full compensation of the amount sought in any such litigation.
38 |
Certain requirements must be met for the recognition and enforceability of foreign judgments in Brazil. Subject to the following, a final and conclusive judgment for civil liabilities rendered by any court in the United States or elsewhere would be recognized in the courts of Brazil (to the extent that Brazilian courts have jurisdiction) and such courts would enforce such judgment without any retrial or reexamination of the merits of the original action only if such judgment has been previously ratified by the Brazilian Superior Court of Justice (Superior Tribunal de Justica), such ratification being subject to:
• | the judgment fulfilling all formalities required for its enforceability under the laws of the jurisdiction where the judgment was rendered; |
• | the judgment contemplating an order to pay a determined sum of money; |
• | the judgment being issued by a competent court after proper service of process of the parties, which service must comply with Brazilian law if made within Brazil, or after sufficient evidence of the parties’ absence has been given, pursuant to applicable law; |
• | the judgment being not subject to appeal (the decision is final; there is res judicata); |
• | the judgment being legalized by the Brazilian consular office in the country where the foreign judgment is issued, unless such judgment is apostilled by a competent authority of the country in which the decision was issued, according to the Hague Convention Abolishing the Requirement of Legalization for Foreign Public Documents of 5 October 1961, and is accompanied by a sworn translation into Portuguese; |
• | the judgment being translated into Portuguese by a certified translator; |
• | the judgment not being contrary to Brazilian public order, Brazilian sovereignty or Brazilian public policy and good morals and principles; |
• | the judgment does not violate the exclusive jurisdiction of Brazilian courts; and |
• | such judgment does not conflict with a previous final and binding judgment on the same matter and involving the same parties issued in Brazil (res judicata). |
Notwithstanding the foregoing, no assurance can be given that such ratification would be obtained, that the process described above would be conducted in a timely manner or that a Brazilian court would enforce a monetary judgment for violation of the U.S. securities laws. In addition:
• | civil actions may be brought before Brazilian courts based on the federal securities laws of the United States and that, subject to applicable law, Brazilian courts may enforce such liabilities in such actions against us and the guarantors (provided that provisions of the federal securities laws of the United States do not contravene Brazilian public order, Brazilian sovereignty or Brazilian good practices and provided further that Brazilian courts can assert jurisdiction over the particular action); and |
• | the ability of a creditor to satisfy a judgment by attaching certain assets of the defendant is limited by provisions of Brazilian law. |
In addition, a plaintiff, whether Brazilian or non-Brazilian, who resides outside Brazil or is outside Brazil during the course of litigation in Brazil and who does not own real property in Brazil must grant a pledge to guarantee the payment of the defendant’s legal fees and court expenses related to court procedures. This pledge must be in an amount sufficient to satisfy the payment of court fees and defendant’s attorneys’ fees, as determined by the Brazilian judge. This requirement will not apply (1) when an exemption is provided by an international agreement or treaty that Brazil is a signatory to; (2) in the case of claims for collection relating to an instrument which may be enforced in Brazilian courts without a review on the merits (titulo executivo extrajudicial); (3) in the case of enforcement of foreign judgments that have been duly recognized by the Brazilian Superior Court of Justice (Superior Tribunal de Justica); or (4) counterclaims as established according to Article 83 of the Brazilian Code of Civil Procedure.
Obligations under the guarantees are subordinated to certain statutory preferences.
The obligations under the guarantees are subordinated to certain statutory preferences. In the event of a liquidation, bankruptcy or judicial reorganization in certain jurisdictions including Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay and Uruguay, such statutory preferences, including post-petition claims, claims for salaries, wages, social security, taxes, court fees and expenses and claims secured by collateral, among others, will have preference over any other claims, including claims by any investor in respect of the guarantees. In such event, enforcement of the guarantees may be unsuccessful, and noteholders may be unable to collect amounts that they are due under the 2025 Notes.
39 |
The 2025 Notes are subject to certain fraudulent transfer and conveyance statutes, which may have adverse implications for the holders of the 2025 Notes.
Fraudulent transfer and insolvency laws may void, subordinate or limit the rights of the holders of the 2025 Notes.
United States
Federal and state fraudulent transfer and conveyance statutes may apply to the issuance of the 2025 Notes and the incurrence of the guarantees, particularly any future guarantees of any U.S. subsidiaries we might create. Under U.S. federal bankruptcy law and comparable provisions of U.S. state fraudulent transfer or conveyance laws, if any such law would be deemed to apply, which may vary from state to state, the 2025 Notes or the guarantees could be voided as a fraudulent transfer or conveyance if a court determines that (1) Navios Logistics or any of the guarantors, as applicable, issued the 2025 Notes or incurred the guarantees with the intent of hindering, delaying or defrauding creditors or (2) Navios Logistics or any of the guarantors, as applicable, received less than reasonably equivalent value or fair consideration in return for either issuing the 2025 Notes or incurring the guarantees and, in the case of (2) only, one of the following is also true at the time thereof:
• | Navios Logistics or any of the guarantors, as applicable, were insolvent or rendered insolvent by reason of the issuance of the 2025 Notes or the incurrence of the guarantees; |
• | the issuance of the 2025 Notes or the incurrence of the guarantees left them or any of the guarantors, as applicable, with an unreasonably small amount of capital to carry on the business as engaged or anticipated; or |
• | Navios Logistics or any of the guarantors intended to, or believed that they or such guarantor would, incur debts beyond its or such guarantor’s ability to pay as they mature. |
If a court were to find that the issuance of the 2025 Notes or the incurrence of the guarantee was a fraudulent transfer or conveyance, the court could void the payment obligations under the 2025 Notes or such guarantee, or require the holders of the 2025 Notes to repay any amounts received with respect to such guarantee. In the event of a finding that a fraudulent transfer or conveyance occurred, the holders of the 2025 Notes may not receive any repayment as provided in the terms of the 2025 Notes. Further, the voidance of the 2025 Notes could result in an event of default with respect to our and our subsidiaries’ other debt that could result in acceleration of such other debt.
As a general matter, value is given for a transfer or an obligation if, in exchange for the transfer or obligation, property is transferred or an antecedent debt is secured or satisfied. A debtor will generally not be considered to have received value in connection with a debt offering if the debtor did not substantially benefit directly or indirectly from the transaction. In that regard, a debtor will generally not be considered to have received value if the proceeds of a debt offering were used to make a dividend payment or otherwise retire or redeem equity securities issued by the debtor. In particular, if the guarantees were legally challenged, such guarantee could be subject to the claim that, since the guarantee was incurred for the Co-Issuers’ benefit, and only indirectly for the benefit of the guarantor, the obligations of the applicable guarantor were incurred for less than reasonably equivalent value or fair consideration.
The measures of insolvency for purposes of fraudulent transfer or conveyance laws vary depending upon the applicable jurisdiction’s governing law, such that Navios Logistics cannot be certain as to the standards a court would use to determine whether or not they or the guarantors were solvent at the relevant time or, regardless of the standard that a court uses, that the issuance of the guarantees would not be further subordinated to our or any of our guarantors’ other debt or whether the 2025 Notes, the guarantees or the granting of liens to secure the 2025 Notes or the guarantees would be avoided as a preference, fraudulent transfer, fraudulent conveyance, or otherwise. Generally, however, an entity would be considered insolvent if, at the time it incurred indebtedness:
• | the sum of its debts, including contingent liabilities, was greater than the fair value of all its assets; or |
• | the present fair saleable value of its assets was less than the amount that would be required to pay its probable liability on its existing debts, including contingent liabilities, as they become absolute and mature; or |
• | it could not pay its debts as they become due. |
In addition, any payment by them pursuant to the 2025 Notes or by a guarantor made at a time when Navios Logistics or such guarantor is subsequently found to be insolvent could be avoided and required to be returned to them or such guarantor or to a fund for the benefit of our or the guarantors’ creditors if such payment is made to an insider within a one-year period prior to a bankruptcy filing or within 90 days to any non-insider party and such payment would give the holders of the 2025 Notes more than such holders of the 2025 Notes would have received in a hypothetical liquidation under Chapter 7 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code.
40 |
Finally, as a court of equity, a U.S. bankruptcy court may otherwise subordinate the claims in respect of our indebtedness to other claims against us under the principle of equitable subordination, if the court determines that: (i) the creditor or holder of 2025 Notes engaged in some type of inequitable conduct; (ii) such inequitable conduct resulted in injury to our other creditors or conferred an unfair advantage upon the claimant; and (iii) equitable subordination is not inconsistent with the provisions of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code.
Republic of the Marshall Islands
Navios Logistics and some of the guarantors as of the issue date are organized under the laws of the Republic of the Marshall Islands. While the Republic of the Marshall Islands does not have a bankruptcy statute or general statutory mechanism for insolvency proceedings, other than the Uncitral Model Law On Cross-Border Insolvency Implementation Act, 2018, a Republic of the Marshall Islands court could apply general U.S. principles of fraudulent conveyance, discussed above, in light of the provisions of the BCA, restricting the grant of guarantees without a corporate purpose. In such case, a Republic of the Marshall Islands court could void or subordinate the 2025 Notes or the guarantees, including for the reasons a U.S. court could void or subordinate a guarantee as described above.
Uruguay
A court in Uruguay could, under fraudulent conveyance law, and upon the request of a creditor of a subsidiary guarantor within one year from its knowledge of the transaction, rescind or revoke the guarantee of any subsidiary guarantor if it found that such guarantee was incurred with malicious intent (fraud) to prevent creditors from satisfying their bona fide claims and the contracting party knew or should have known that the subsidiary guarantor was insolvent. If a court were to revoke or rescind the guarantee of a subsidiary guarantor as a fraudulent conveyance, or hold it unenforceable for any other reason, holders of the notes would cease to have a claim against that subsidiary guarantor and would be creditors solely of Navios Logistics and any subsidiary guarantor whose guarantee was not voided or held unenforceable.
In addition, under Uruguayan law, a guarantee is considered accessory to the principal obligation. Therefore, in case our underlying obligations under the notes or the indenture are declared null, the guarantees would, under Uruguayan law, be deemed to be null as well.
Argentina
The validity and enforceability of the guarantee granted by the guarantor that is an Argentine entity always requires the guarantee to be in the best interest of the Argentine guarantor and that the Argentine guarantor is authorized by its by-laws to provide guarantees and receives fair and adequate consideration for the granting of the guarantees, in order to avoid any third party’s potential challenges.
A court could, under fraudulent conveyance law, declare null and void the following transactions if celebrated within a maximum of two years before the date of declaration of bankruptcy or the date of initiation of the reorganization proceeding (if it is an indirect bankruptcy):
• | transactions where the guarantor did not receive a fair consideration in exchange for celebrating such transaction; |
• | early payment of obligations maturing at the time of the declaration of bankruptcy or afterwards; |
• | pledges, mortgages or any other privileges in relation to any obligation not already overdue and which originally did not have such privilege; |
• | transactions where the counterparty was aware of the insolvency of the guarantor. |
Therefore, it may be possible that the guarantees may not be enforceable under Argentine law. In the event that a guarantor becomes subject to a reorganization proceeding or to bankruptcy, the relevant guarantee, if granted within a maximum of two years before the date of declaration of bankruptcy or the date of initiation of the reorganization proceeding (if it is an indirect bankruptcy), may be deemed to have been a fraudulent transfer and declared void, based upon the guarantor not having received a fair consideration in exchange for the granting of such guarantee. The validity and enforceability of the guarantee granted by the guarantor that is an Argentine entity requires the guarantee to be in the best interest of the Argentine guarantor and that the Argentine guarantor is authorized by its by-laws to provide guarantees and receives fair and adequate consideration for the granting of the guarantees.
In addition, under Argentine law, a guarantee is considered accessory to the principal obligation. Therefore, in case our underlying obligations under the 2025 Notes are declared null, the guarantees would, under Argentine law, be deemed to be null as well.
41 |
Paraguay
Under Paraguay law which does not forbid providing such guarantees to related or non-related parties, the guarantee of the 2025 Notes may not be enforceable as the guarantee is considered accessory to the principal obligation, which if declared null or void, would imply that the guarantee would be deemed likewise null or void. The guarantees are valid, binding and enforceable against the guarantors. However, if a guarantor becomes subject to a creditors meeting or bankruptcy proceedings, within one year of granting the guarantee, the guarantee may be deemed to have been a fraudulent transfer and declared null.
Under Paraguayan law, fraudulent conveyance of assets is covered by Art. 305 to 316 of the Civil Code by which an affected creditor may ask the Civil and Commercial Courts to annul the fraudulent conveyance, reverting the transferred assets to the debtor, which then become attachable by local or foreign creditors. In the event of bankruptcy of a Paraguayan subsidiary, Article 8 of Law 154/69 states that the declaration of bankruptcy in a foreign country cannot be opposed to creditors domiciled in Paraguay or over assets held by a debtor in the country, nor covered by agreements that have been executed with such debtor. If bankruptcy is declared by Paraguayan courts, creditors that are part of the bankruptcy process in a foreign country shall not be taken into consideration by the local courts; if local creditors have been fully paid, foreign creditors may be paid with the remaining assets. The bankruptcy declared in a United States court will not imply the bankruptcy of the subsidiary operating in Paraguayan jurisdiction under Paraguayan law. Under fraudulent conveyance law, a court may void the guarantee if it deems that it was incurred with the intention to hinder or defraud its creditors.
Brazil
A court could, under fraudulent conveyance law, or BBRL, void or consider ineffective the guarantee of any subsidiary guarantor if it found that such guarantee was incurred with actual intent to hinder, delay or defraud creditors, and that the guarantor was any of the following:
• | already insolvent; |
• | rendered insolvent by reason of its entering into such guarantee; |
• | engaged in business or transactions for which the assets remaining constituted unreasonable small capital; or |
• | small capital. |
If a court were to void the guarantee of a subsidiary guarantor as a fraudulent conveyance, or hold it unenforceable for any other reason, holders of the 2025 Notes would cease to have a claim against that subsidiary guarantor and would be creditors solely of Navios Logistics and any subsidiary guarantor whose guarantee was not voided or held unenforceable.
Other Jurisdictions
The laws of the other jurisdictions in which guarantors may be organized may also limit the ability of such guarantors to guarantee debt of a parent company. These limitations arise under various provisions or principles of corporate law which include provisions requiring a subsidiary guarantor to receive adequate corporate benefit from the financing, rules governing preservation of share capital, thin capitalization and fraudulent transfer principles. In certain of these jurisdictions, the guarantees will contain language limiting the amount of debt guaranteed so that the applicable local law restrictions will not be violated. Accordingly, if an individual were to enforce the guarantees in such jurisdictions, such claims could be limited. Furthermore, although we believe that the guarantees of such guarantors are enforceable (subject to local law restrictions), a third-party creditor may challenge these guarantees and prevail in court. Navios Logistics can provide no assurance that the guarantees will be enforceable.
Tax Risks
We may have earned U.S. source income that is subject to U.S. federal income tax, thereby adversely affecting our results of operations and cash flows.
Under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code, 50.0% of the gross shipping income of a vessel owning or chartering corporation that is attributable to transportation that either begins or ends, but that does not both begin and end, in the U.S. is characterized as U.S.-source shipping income. U.S.-source shipping income generally is subject to a 4.0% U.S. federal income tax without allowance for deduction or, if such U.S.-source shipping income is effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business in the U.S., U.S. federal corporate income tax (the statutory rate presently is 21.0%) as well as a branch profits tax (presently imposed at a 30.0% rate on effectively connected earnings), unless that corporation qualifies for exemption from tax under Section 883 of the Code. We believe that we and each of our subsidiaries qualified for this statutory tax exemption under Section 883 with respect to our U.S.-source shipping income, provided that our common stock represented more than 50.0% of the total combined voting power of all classes of our stock entitled to vote and of the total value of our stock, and less than 50.0% of our common stock was owned, actually or constructively under specified stock attribution rules, on more than half the number of days in the relevant year by persons who each own 5.0% or more of the vote and value of our common stock (unless we can establish that a sufficient proportion of such 5% shareholders are qualified shareholders (as defined for purposes of Section 883) so as to preclude other persons who are 5% shareholders from having owned 50% or more of the value of our common stock for more than half the days during the taxable year). We can give no assurance that we qualified for the exemption under Section 883 with respect to any such income we earned. If we were not entitled to the Section 883 exemption for any taxable year, we generally would be subject to a 4.0% U.S. federal gross income tax with respect to our U.S.-source shipping income or, if such U.S. source shipping income were effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business in the U.S., U.S. federal corporate income tax as well as a branch profits tax for those years. As a result, depending on the trading patterns of our vessels, we could become liable for tax, and our net income and cash flow could be adversely affected. Please see the discussion under “Taxation—Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations—U.S. Federal Income Taxation of the Company—Taxation of Our Shipping Income.”
42 |
Navios Holdings may be taxed as a U.S. corporation.
The purchase by International Shipping Enterprises Inc. (“ISE”), our predecessor, of all of the outstanding shares of common stock of Navios Holdings, and the subsequent downstream merger of ISE with and into Navios Holdings took place on August 25, 2005. Navios Holdings is incorporated under the laws of the Republic of the Marshall Islands. ISE received an opinion from its counsel for the merger transaction that, while there is no direct authority that governs the tax treatment of the transaction, it was more likely than not that Navios Holdings would be taxed by the U.S. as a foreign corporation. Accordingly, we take the position that Navios Holdings will be taxed as a foreign corporation by the U.S. If Navios Holdings were to be taxed as a U.S. corporation, its taxes would be significantly higher than they are currently.
A change in tax laws, treaties or regulations, or their interpretation, of any country in which we operate our business could result in a high tax rate on our worldwide earnings, which could result in a significant negative impact on our earnings and cash flows from operations.
We are an international company that conducts business throughout the world. Tax laws and regulations are highly complex and subject to interpretation. Consequently, we are subject to changing tax laws, treaties and regulations in and between countries in which we operate. Our income tax expense is based upon our interpretation of tax laws in effect in various countries at the time that the expense was incurred. A change in these tax laws, treaties or regulations, or in the interpretation thereof, or in the valuation of our deferred tax assets, could result in a materially higher tax expense or a higher effective tax rate on our worldwide earnings, and such change could be significant to our financial results. If any tax authority successfully challenges our operational structure, intercompany pricing policies or the taxable presence of our key subsidiaries in certain countries, or if the terms of certain income tax treaties are interpreted in a manner that is adverse to our structure, or if we lose a material tax dispute in any country, our effective tax rate on our worldwide earnings from our operations could increase substantially and our earnings and cash flows from these operations could be materially adversely affected. For example, in accordance with the currently applicable Greek law, foreign flagged vessels that are managed by Greek or foreign ship management companies having established an office in Greece are subject to duties towards the Greek state, which are calculated on the basis of the relevant vessel’s tonnage. The payment of said duties exhausts the tax liability of the foreign ship owning company and the relevant manager against any tax, duty, charge or contribution payable on income from the exploitation of the foreign flagged vessel.
We and our subsidiaries may be subject to taxation in the jurisdictions in which we and our subsidiaries conduct business. Such taxation would result in decreased earnings available to our stockholders.
Investors are encouraged to consult their own tax advisors concerning the overall tax consequences of the ownership of our common stock arising in an investor’s particular situation under U.S. federal, state, local and foreign law.
U.S. tax authorities could treat us as a “passive foreign investment company,” which could have adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences to U.S. holders.
A foreign corporation will be treated as a passive foreign investment company, or PFIC, for U.S. federal income tax purposes if either (1) at least 75% of its gross income for any taxable year consists of certain types of “passive income” or (2) at least 50% of the quarterly average value of the corporation’s assets produce or are held for the production of those types of “passive income.” For purposes of these tests, “passive income” includes dividends, interest, capital gains and rents (other than rents derived other than in the active conduct of a rental business). For purposes of these tests, income derived from the performance of services does not constitute “passive income.” For purposes of determining whether we are a PFIC, we will be treated as earning and owning our proportionate share of the income and assets, respectively, of any of our subsidiary corporations in which we own at least 25.0% of the value of the subsidiary’s stock, including Navios Logistics. U.S. stockholders of a PFIC are subject to a disadvantageous U.S. federal income tax regime with respect to the income derived by the PFIC, the distributions they receive from the PFIC and the gain, if any, they derive from the sale or other disposition of their shares in the PFIC and additional tax filing obligations.
43 |
Based upon our actual and projected income, assets and activities, we intend to take the position, to the extent we are required to do so, that we were not a PFIC for our taxable year ended December 31, 2022 and that we will not become a PFIC for the forseeable future, although there can be no assurance in this regard. For taxable years after 2022, whether we are a PFIC will depend largely on the income, assets and activities of Navios Logistics, as well as any other income we earn or are deemed to earn and assets we own or are deemed to own.
We believe that there is a significant amount of legal authority consisting of the Code, legislative history and U.S. Internal Revenue Service, or IRS, pronouncements and rulings supporting our position that income we derive or are deemed to derive from our port terminal, time charter and voyage charter operations constitute services income (rather than rental income). However, it should be noted that this authority is in other contexts, and there is no direct legal authority under the PFIC rules addressing whether income from port terminal, time charter or voyage charter operations is services income or rental income (or otherwise constitutes passive income), and there is also contrary authority in other contexts, including authority which characterizes certain types of income we earn or are deemed to earn as rental income rather than services income for other tax purposes. Accordingly, no assurance can be given that the IRS or a court of law will accept this position and there is a risk that the IRS or a court of law could determine that we are a PFIC. In addition, no assurance can be given as to our current and future PFIC status, because such status requires an annual factual determination based upon the composition of our income and assets for the entire taxable year. The PFIC determination also depends on the application of complex U.S. federal income tax rules concerning the classification of our income and assets for this purpose, and there are legal uncertainties involved in determining whether the income derived from our chartering activities and from our logistics activities constitutes rental income or income derived from the performance of services. Moreover, the applicability of the relevant legal authorities to our business and organizational structure is not entirely clear and is subject to differing interpretations. We have not sought, and we do not expect to seek, an IRS ruling on this issue. As a result, the IRS or a court could disagree with our position. In addition, although we intend to conduct our affairs in a manner to avoid, to the extent possible, being classified as a PFIC with respect to any taxable year, we cannot provide any assurance that the nature of our operations, or the nature or composition of our income or assets, will not change in the future, or that we can avoid PFIC status in the future.
If the IRS were to find that we are or have been a PFIC for any taxable year, our U.S. stockholders would face adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences and certain information reporting requirements. Under the PFIC rules, unless those stockholders make an election available under the Code (which election could itself have adverse consequences for such stockholders, and which election may not be available if our common stock were to cease to be listed on the NYSE), such stockholders would be liable to pay U.S. federal income tax at the then prevailing ordinary income tax rates, plus interest, upon excess distributions and upon any gain from the disposition of their shares of common stock, as if the excess distribution or gain had been recognized ratably over the stockholder’s holding period of the common stock. In addition, for each year during which we are treated as a PFIC and a U.S. holder actually or constructively own our common stock you generally will be required to file IRS Form 8621 with its U.S. federal income tax return to report certain information concerning your ownership of our common stock. Please see the discussion under “Taxation—Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations — Taxation of U.S. Holders of our Common Stock — Passive Foreign Investment Company Status.”
U.S. persons that own 10% or more of our equity interests may be subject to adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences under rules applicable to U.S. shareholders of controlled foreign corporations.
A non-U.S. corporation generally will be classified as a controlled foreign corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes, or a CFC, if U.S. persons (including, for this purpose, entities classified as U.S. partnerships for U.S. federal income tax purposes) that each own 10% or more of the equity (by vote or value), directly, indirectly or constructively, of such corporation (each a “10% U.S. Shareholder”) together own more than 50% of either the total combined voting power of all classes of stock of such corporation entitled to vote or of the total value of the stock of such corporation. The CFC rules provide that, for purposes of determining whether our non-U.S. subsidiaries are classified as CFCs, our U.S. subsidiaries are treated as the constructive owners of 100% of the equity interests of our non-U.S. subsidiaries (the so-called “downward attribution” rule). Accordingly, our non-U.S. subsidiaries are classified as CFCs. U.S. persons should consult their own tax advisors regarding the U.S. federal income tax consequences that may result from us or our non-U.S. subsidiaries being classified as CFCs.
44 |
The U.S. federal income tax consequences for U.S. persons (including, for this purpose, entities classified as U.S. partnerships for U.S. federal income tax purposes) who at all times are not 10% U.S. Shareholders would not be affected by the CFC rules. However, a U.S. person that is a 10% U.S. Shareholder would generally be subject to current U.S. federal income taxation on its pro rata share (based solely on its direct or indirect ownership of our equity) of our (and our subsidiaries’, if such U.S. person is a 10% U.S. Shareholder with respect to such subsidiaries) so-called “subpart F” income and “global intangible low-taxed income” (subject to applicable rules), regardless of whether such 10% U.S. Shareholder receives any actual distributions. A U.S. person that is a 10% U.S. Shareholder will also be subject to additional U.S. federal income tax information reporting requirements with respect to our subsidiaries that are classified as CFCs (and substantial penalties may be imposed for noncompliance. Each U.S. person should consult its own tax advisor regarding the CFC rules and whether such U.S. person may be a 10% U.S. Shareholder for purposes of these rules.
Item 4. Information on the Company
A. History and Development of the Company
The legal and commercial name of the Company is Navios Maritime Holdings Inc. The Company is a corporation incorporated under the BCA and the laws of the Republic of the Marshall Islands. The Company’s office and principal place of business is located at Strathvale House, 90 N Church Street, P.O. Box 309, Grand Cayman, KY1-1104 Cayman Islands, and its telephone number is +1 345 232 3067.
On August 25, 2005, pursuant to a Stock Purchase Agreement dated February 28, 2005, as amended, by and among ISE, Navios Holdings, and all the shareholders of Navios Holdings, ISE acquired Navios Holdings through the purchase of all of the outstanding shares of common stock of Navios Holdings. As a result of this acquisition, Navios Holdings became a wholly-owned subsidiary of ISE. In addition, on August 25, 2005, simultaneously with the acquisition of Navios Holdings, ISE effected a reincorporation from the State of Delaware to the Republic of the Marshall Islands through a downstream merger with and into its newly acquired wholly-owned subsidiary, whose name was and continued to be Navios Maritime Holdings Inc.
Navios Holdings owns (i) a controlling equity stake in NSAL, one of the largest infrastructure and logistics companies in the Hidrovia region of South America; and (ii) an interest in Navios Partners, a United States publicly listed shipping company that owns and operates dry cargo and tanker vessels.
In September 2022, Navios Holdings completed the sale of its 36-vessel dry bulk fleet consisting of cash and the assumption of bank debt and finance leases related to the vessels, and subject to a working capital adjustment at closing (the “Transaction”), to Navios Partners. The former dry bulk vessel operations were historically a separate reportable segment of the Company. Subsequent to the closing of the Transaction, the results of the dry bulk vessel operations are reported as discontinued operations for all periods presented. For further information see Note 3 “Discontinued operations” in the consolidated financial statements, included elsewhere in this Annual Report.
Navios South American Logistics Inc.
Navios Logistics, a consolidated subsidiary of the Company, was incorporated under the laws of the Republic of the Marshall Islands on December 17, 2007. Navios Logistics believes it is one of the largest infrastructure and logistics companies in the Hidrovia region river system, the main navigable river system in the region (the “Hidrovia region”), and on the cabotage trades along the south-eastern coast of South America. Navios Logistics serves its customers in the Hidrovia region through its three existing port storage and transfer facilities (the “Port Terminal Business”). The Port Terminal Business comprises its grain port terminal (the “Grain Port Terminal”), which supports agricultural and forest-related exports; its iron-ore port terminal (the “Iron Ore Port Terminal”), which supports mineral-related exports; and its liquid port terminal (the “Liquid Port Terminal”), with tank storage for refined petroleum products. The Grain Port Terminal and the Iron Ore Port Terminal (together, the “Dry Port Terminal”) are located in Nueva Palmira, Uruguay, and the Liquid Port Terminal is located in San Antonio, Paraguay. Navios Logistics complements these three port terminals with a diverse fleet of 271 barges and 30 pushboats that operate in its barge business (the “Barge Business”), and seven vessels, comprising five tankers, one bunker vessel and one river and estuary product tanker, all of which operate in its cabotage business (“the Cabotage Business”). Navios Logistics provides transportation for dry cargo (cereals, cotton pellets, soybeans, wheat, limestone (clinker), mineral iron, and rolling stones), liquid cargo (hydrocarbons such as crude oil, gas oil, naphtha, fuel oil and vegetable oils) and liquefied cargo (liquefied petroleum gas or “LPG”). As of December 31, 2022, Navios Holdings owned 63.8% of Navios Logistics’ stock.
45 |
Navios Partners
Navios Partners is an international owner and operator of dry cargo and tanker vessels and is engaged in the seaborne transportation services of a wide range of liquid and dry cargo commodities. Types of commodities Navios Partners transports include crude oil, refined petroleum, chemicals, iron ore, coal, grain, fertilizer and containers. Navios Partners charters its vessels under short-, medium-, and longer-term charters.
On March 31, 2021, Navios Partners acquired Navios Containers in a merger transaction (the “NMCI Merger”). Following the completion of the NMCI Merger Navios Holdings had no equity investment in Navios Containers. For more information about the NMCI Merger, see Note 9 “Investments in Affiliate Companies” to the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report.
On October 15, 2021, Navios Acquisition and Navios Partners consummated a merger transaction (the “NNA Merger”). Following the consummation of the NNA Merger, Navios Holdings had no equity investment in Navios Acquisition. For more information about the NNA Merger, see Note 9 “Investments in Affiliate Companies” to the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report.
As of both December 31, 2022 and 2021, Navios Holdings had a 10.3% ownership interest in Navios Partners. Incentive distribution rights are held by a consolidated subsidiary of Navios Holdings.
Navios Europe II
Navios Europe II was engaged in the marine transportation industry through the ownership of seven dry bulkers and seven containership vessels.
On February 18, 2015, Navios Holdings, Navios Acquisition and Navios Partners had established Navios Europe II under the laws of Republic of the Marshall Islands and had economic interests of 47.5%, 47.5% and 5.0%, respectively, and voting interests of 50.0%, 50.0% and 0%, respectively. From June 8, 2015 through December 31, 2015, Navios Europe II acquired 14 vessels for aggregate consideration consisting of: (i) cash (which was funded with the proceeds of a senior loan facility (the “Senior Loans II”) and loans aggregating to $14.0 million from Navios Holdings, Navios Acquisition and Navios Partners (in each case, in proportion to their economic interests in Navios Europe II) (collectively, the “Navios Term Loans II”) and (ii) the assumption of a junior participating loan facility (the “Junior Loan II”). In addition to the Navios Term Loans II, Navios Holdings, Navios Acquisition and Navios Partners would also have made available to Navios Europe II revolving loans up to $43.5 million to fund working capital requirements (collectively, the “Navios Revolving Loans II”). In March 2017, the amount of the Navios Revolving Loans II increased by $14.0 million. On April 21, 2020, Navios Europe II and the lenders agreed to fully release the liabilities under the Junior Loan II for $5.0 million. The structure was liquidated in June 2020. As of December 31, 2020, the Company received in cash all balances relating to Navios Europe II and acquired two Panamax vessels of Navios Europe II, see Note 16 “Transactions with Related Parties” to the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report
B. Business overview
Introduction
Navios Holdings owns a controlling equity stake in Navios South American Logistics Inc., one of the largest infrastructure and logistics companies in the Hidrovia region of South America and an interest in Navios Maritime Partners L.P., a leading U.S. publicly listed shipping company which owns and operates dry cargo and tanker vessels.
For over 70 years, producers of raw materials, agricultural traders and exporters, industrial end-users, ship owners, charterers, ship and derivative brokers, agents, and financial business partners have relied on Navios Holdings’ expertise and innovation.
Administration Services
Pursuant to the Administrative Services Agreement, the Manager provides us with access to human resources, financial and other administrative functions, including:
• | bookkeeping, audit and accounting services; |
• | administrative and clerical services; |
• | banking and financial services; and |
• | client and investor relations. |
Navios Logistics conducts all daily technical and commercial management for its owned fleet in-house. These services, as well as administration of its fleet, are provided from several offices situated in Argentina, Paraguay, Uruguay and Brazil. Navios Logistics will continue to undertake all technical and commercial management for its barges and pushboats and vessels, such as drydocking, repairs and maintenance, including the purchasing of supplies, spare parts and husbandry items, crewing, superintendence and preparation and payment of all related accounts.
46 |
Financial Risk Management: Navios Holdings actively engages in assessing financial risks associated with fluctuating future freight rates, daily time charter hire rates, fuel prices, credit risks, interest rates and foreign exchange rates. Financial risk management is carried out under policies approved and guidelines established by the Company’s executive management.
• | Credit Risk: The Company closely monitors its exposure to customers and counterparties for credit risk. Navios Holdings, through its access to NSM policies and personnel, has policies designed to limit trading to customers and counterparties with an appropriate credit history. Credit risk with respect to accounts receivable is reduced by the Company by rendering services to established international operators. Management believes that no additional credit risk beyond amounts provided for collection losses is inherent in the Company’s trade receivables. |
• | Foreign Exchange Risk: Although Navios Holdings’ revenues are U.S. dollar-based, 59.3% of its expenses from continuing operations, related to its Navios Logistics segment, are in Uruguayan pesos, Argentinean pesos, Paraguayan Guaranies and Brazilian Reales. Navios Holdings monitors its Argentine Peso, Uruguayan Peso, Paraguayan Guarani and Brazilian Real exposure against long-term currency forecasts and enters into foreign currency contracts when considered appropriate. |
Customers
Logistics Business Operations
Navios Logistics has a long history of operating in the Hidrovia Region. Navios Logistics has consistent contract renewals and longstanding relationships with a diverse group of large customers, primarily comprised of major international agriculture, mining and oil companies and their affiliates such as Archer Daniels Midland Company (“ADM”), Cargill International S.A. (“Cargill”), Louis Dreyfus Holding B.V. (“Louis Dreyfus”), Petropar SA (“Petropar”) (the national oil company of Paraguay), YPF S.A. (“YPF”), Trafigura Group Pte Ltd (“Trafigura”), Vale, and Vitol. These long-term customer relationships arise from our reputation for reliability and high-quality service. In its Grain Port Terminal in Uruguay, Navios Logistics has been serving three of its key customers, ADM, Cargill and Louis Dreyfus, for more than 25 years on average. In its Liquid Port Terminal, liquid barge transportation and Cabotage Business, Navios Logistics has long-term relationships with its global petroleum customers for more than 20 years on average (such as Axion Energy, Petrobras Group, YPF and Shell or their successors). In its Barge Business, Navios Logistics started its relationship with Vale in 2008 for iron ore transportation and has signed new contracts for storing and transshipping iron ore and other commodities since then. In addition, almost all of Navios Logistics’ contracts are U.S. dollar denominated and most of its dry port terminals’ contracts include minimum volume guarantees and built-in tariff escalators. This reduces Navios Logistics’ currency, volume and pricing risks, which enables Navios Logistics to have strong cash-flow visibility.
Concentrations of credit risk with respect to accounts receivables are limited due to Navios Logistics’ large number of customers, who are established international operators and have an appropriate credit history. Due to these factors, management believes that no additional credit risk, beyond amounts provided for collection losses, is inherent in its trade receivables. (See also Item 3.D. “Risk Factors—Navios Logistics depends on a few significant customers for a large part of its revenues and the loss of one or more of these customers could materially and adversely affect its revenues.”).
Competition
Navios Logistics
Navios Logistics believes that it is one of the largest providers of infrastructure, logistics and fluvial and marine transportation services in the Hidrovia Region, with the region’s second largest barge fleet and the third largest cabotage fleet in Argentina. Navios Logistics believes its ownership of river ports, including our Dry Port Terminals in Uruguay that provide access to the Atlantic Ocean, allows them to offer a logistics solution superior to its competitors that also operate barges and pushboats. Navios Logistics also competes based on reliability, efficiency and price.
With respect to loading, storage and ancillary services, the market is divided between transits and exports, depending on the cargo origin. In the case of transits there are other companies operating in the river system that are able to offer services similar to ours. However, most of these companies are proprietary service providers that are focused on servicing their own cargo. Unlike these companies, Navios Logistics is an independent service provider in the market for transits. With respect to exports, its competitors are Montevideo Port in Montevideo, Ontur in Nueva Palmira, and TGU in Nueva Palmira. The main competitor of its Liquid Port Terminal in Paraguay is Petropar, a Paraguayan state-owned entity. Other competitors include Copetrol, TLP, Trafigura and Petrobras.
47 |
Navios Logistics faces competition in our Barge and Cabotage Businesses with transportation of oil and refined petroleum products from other independent shipowners and from vessel operators who primarily charter vessels to meet their cargo carrying needs. The charter markets in which its vessels compete are highly competitive. Key competitors include Atria Logistica S.A., Hidrovias do Brasil, Interbarge and P&O. In addition, some of its customers, including ADM, Cargill, Louis Dreyfus and Transbarge Navegacion S.A., have some of their own dedicated barge capacity, which they can use to transport cargo in lieu of hiring a third party. Navios Logistics also competes indirectly with other forms of land-based transportation such as truck and rail. Competition is primarily based on prevailing market contract rates, vessel location and vessel manager know-how, reputation and credibility. These companies and other smaller entities are regular competitors of them in its primary tanker trading areas. Navios Logistics believe that its ability to combine its ports in Uruguay and Paraguay with its versatile fleet of barges, pushboats and tankers to offer integrated, end-to-end logistics solutions for both its dry and liquid customers seeking to transport mineral and grain commodities and liquid cargoes through the Hidrovia Region has allowed them to differentiate its business and offer superior services compared to its competitors.
Navios Partners
Navios Partners is an international owner and operator of dry cargo and tanker vessels formed by Navios Holdings. Its vessels are generally chartered-out under short-term, medium and long-term time charters with an average remaining charter duration of approximately 1.9 years to a strong group of counterparties, including ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (“ZIM”), HMM, Chevron Transport Corporation Ltd. (“Chevron”), Feedertech PTE Ltd. (“Feedertech”), COSCO Shipping Group, Al-Iraqia Shipping Services & Oil Trading (“AISSOT”), Saudi Aramco, Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha (“NYK Line”) and Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd. (“K Line”).
Navios Partners’ fleet consists of 83 drybulk vessels, 47 containerships and 46 tanker vessels, including three newbuilding Capesize chartered-in vessels under bareboat contracts expected to be delivered in the first half of 2023, six newbuilding Aframax/LR2 vessels expected to be delivered in 2024 and the first half of 2025, two newbuilding MR2 Product Tanker chartered-in vessels under bareboat contracts expected to be delivered in the second half of 2025 and the first half of 2026 and 12 newbuilding Containerships expected to be delivered by the second half of 2023 and in 2024. The fleet excludes one Ultra-Handymax and one LR1 Product Tanker vessels agreed to be sold.
Navios Partners generates revenues by charging its customers for the use of its vessels to transport their dry cargo commodities, containers, crude oil, refined petroleum products and/or bulk liquid chemicals. In general, the vessels in its fleet are chartered-out under time charters, which range in length from one to twelve years at inception. From time to time, Navios Partners operates vessels in the spot market until the vessels have been chartered out under short-term, medium and long-term charters.
48 |
REGULATION
Environmental, Safety, and Security Regulations
Shipping is one of the world’s most heavily regulated industries, as it is subject to both governmental regulation and industry standards. The governmental regulations to which Navios Logistics is subject include local and national laws and regulations, as well as international conventions promulgated by the International Maritime Organization (“IMO”), the United Nations agency governing the maritime sector. Navios Logistics also is subject to regulation by ship classification societies and industry associations, which often have independent standards. Worldwide enforcement of environmental laws is on the rise, and national and local laws and regulations may be more stringent than international conventions, as well as industry standards. Violations of these laws, regulations, conventions as implemented by various countries, and other requirements could result in sanctions by regulators, possibly fines, penalties, delays, and detention.
The primary areas of maritime laws and standards to which Navios Logistics is subject include environment, safety, and security, as provided in detail below.
Pollution Prevention
The International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships, or “MARPOL,” is the primary international convention governing vessel pollution prevention and response. MARPOL includes six annexes containing regulations for the prevention of pollution by oil (Annex I), by noxious liquid substances (“NLS”) in bulk (Annex II), by harmful substances in packaged forms within the scope of the International Maritime Dangerous Goods Code (Annex III), by sewage (Annex IV), by garbage (Annex V), and by air emissions, including sulfur oxides (“SOx”), nitrogen oxides (“NOx”), and particulate matter (Annex VI). The annexes also contain recordkeeping and inspection requirements. Fines and penalties may apply for MARPOL violations, particularly for improper discharges into the air or water.
Under MARPOL Annex I, our and our affiliates’ ships are required to have an International Oil Pollution Prevention (“IOPP”) Certificate and a Shipboard Oil Pollution Emergency Plan; under Annex IV, an International Sewage Pollution Prevention Certificate; under Annex V, a Garbage Management Plan; and under Annex VI, an International Air Pollution Prevention Certificate issued by their flag States, among other requirements, some of which must be approved by their flag States. Additionally, Annex II separates NLS into three categories (X, Y, and Z), depending upon the seriousness of the hazard presented, and Annex III contains requirements for safe handling of packaged substances that represent a serious risk to the environment, as well as guidelines for identification of harmful substances. For example, any relevant documents, such as the ship’s manifest, must identify the substances carried, if any, aboard our vessels.
Of note, the emissions standards for sulfur oxides (“SOx”) under MARPOL Annex VI were recently amended. As of January 1, 2020, the standard was lowered to 0.5% worldwide (down from the previous level of 3.5%). Current regulations also allow for special emissions control areas (“ECAs”) to be established with more stringent controls on emissions of 0.1% sulfur, particulate matter, and nitrogen oxide emissions. Thus, the 0.5% sulfur content requirement applies outside the ECAs. Depending on the type of vessel, transitioning to use of low sulfur fuel as a means of compliance may have required fuel system modification and tank cleaning. Another means of compliance is the installation of pollution control equipment (exhaust gas cleaning systems or scrubbers), allowing the vessel to use the existing, less expensive, high sulfur content fuel.
Thus far, ECAs have been formally adopted for the Baltic Sea area (limits SOx emissions only, subject to the 2017 amendments described below); the North Sea area including the English Channel (limiting SOx emissions only subject to the 2017 amendments described below); the North American ECA (limiting SOx, nitrogen oxides (“NOx”), and particulate matter emissions); and the U.S. Caribbean ECA (limiting SOx, NOx, and particulates). The IMO adopted in 2017 the designation of the North Sea and Baltic Sea as ECAs for NOx under Annex VI as well, which took effect in January 2021 for new vessels constructed on or after January 1, 2021 or existing vessels that replace an engine with non-identical engines, or install an additional engine.
Despite Annex VI’s extensive regulations, some jurisdictions have taken unilateral approaches to air emissions regulation. For example, the U.S. state of California has adopted the California Ocean-Going Vessel Fuel Regulation which contains more stringent low sulfur fuel requirements within California-regulated waters, requiring marine gas oil, extending out to 24 nautical miles, thus prohibiting the use of exhaust gas cleaning systems. China has also established local emissions control areas: the Pearl River Delta, the Yangtze River Delta, and Bohai Bay. While the Chinese areas are currently consistent with international standards in terms of requiring a 0.5% sulfur content, certain Chinese local emissions control areas such as inland waterways, coastal emission control areas and Hainan waters have a 0.1% sulfur limit in force. Similarly, South Korea has established Port Air Quality Control Zones, which cap the sulfur content of fuel at 0.1%. South Korea’s Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries designated South Korea’s port areas in in Busan, Ulsan, Yeosu, Gwangyang, Incheon and Pyeongtaek-Dangjin as ECA areas and as of January 1, 2022, the 0.1 % sulfur limit extends to all vessels from the moment of entering until the moment of exiting the Korean ECA. Since 2010, all vessels in the EU must changeover to 0.1% sulfur fuel oil when ‘at berth’ in EU and European Economic Area (“EEA”) ports due to EU Directive 2005/33/EC.
In addition, certain jurisdictions in which we trade have not adopted all of the MARPOL annexes, and some may have established various national, regional, or local laws and regulations that apply to these areas. As of January 31, 2023, the countries in the Hidrovia Region have adopted and ratified MARPOL with the following exceptions: Paraguay has not adopted any of the MARPOL Annexes and Bolivia has not ratified Annex VI.
49 |
Ballast Water
The IMO, as well as jurisdictions worldwide acting outside the scope of the IMO, have implemented requirements relating to the management of ballast water to prevent the harmful effects of foreign invasive species.
The IMO’s International Convention for the Control and Management of Ships’ Ballast Water and Sediments (the “BWM Convention”) entered into force on September 8, 2017. The BWM Convention requires ships to manage ballast water in a manner that removes, renders harmless, or avoids the uptake or discharge of aquatic organisms and pathogens within ballast water and sediment. As of January 31, 2023, the BWM Convention had 94 contracting States, representing 92.41% of the world’s gross tonnage. Also, as of that date, Argentina and Brazil are the only Hidrovia Region parties to the BWM Convention.
As amended, the BWM Convention requires, among other things, ballast water exchange, the maintenance of certain records, and the implementation of a Ballast Water and Sediments Management Plan. It also requires the installation of ballast water management systems for existing ships by certain deadlines. Ships constructed prior to September 8, 2017, must install ballast water management systems by the first renewal survey after September 8, 2017 and must comply with IMO discharge standards by the due date for their IOPP Certificate renewal survey under MARPOL Annex I. Ships constructed after September 8, 2017 are required to comply with the BWM Convention upon delivery. All ships must meet the IMO ballast water discharge standard by September 8, 2024, regardless of construction date. Updated guidance for Ballast Water and Sediments Management Plan includes more robust testing and performance specifications.
Pollution Liability Regimes
Several international conventions impose and limit pollution liability from vessels. An owner of a tank vessel carrying a cargo of “persistent oil,” as defined by the International Convention for Civil Liability for Oil Pollution Damage (the “CLC”), is subject to strict liability for any pollution damage caused in a contracting state by an escape or discharge from cargo or bunker tanks. There is a financial limit on this liability, which is calculated by reference to the tonnage of the ship. The right to limit liability may be lost if the spill is caused by the ship owner’s intentional or reckless conduct. Liability may also be incurred under the CLC for a bunker spill from the vessel even when it is not carrying such cargo if the spill occurs while it is in ballast. However, certain states have only ratified earlier iterations of the CLC, which have a lower liability limit, restrict the area in which the convention is applicable, and only cover spills from tankers if laden at the time of the spill.
The CLC applies in over 100 jurisdictions around the world. In the Hidrovia Region, Argentina and Uruguay have ratified the CLC; Brazil has ratified an earlier version of the CLC, the “1969 Convention;” and Bolivia and Paraguay have not ratified any version of the CLC. Further, it is possible that courts in certain States may interpret the CLC to provide fewer protections, which can increase our liability in certain areas of the globe. In particular, there are indications that some courts in Brazil and Argentina may do so in the face of significant incidents.
When a tanker is carrying clean oil products that do not constitute “persistent oil” under the CLC, liability for any pollution damage will generally fall outside the CLC and will generally depend on domestic laws in the jurisdiction where the spillage occurs, although other international conventions may apply. The same principle applies to any pollution from the vessel in a jurisdiction that is not a party to the CLC.
For vessel operations not covered by the CLC, including all non-tank vessels in our fleet, international liability for oil pollution may be governed by the International Convention on Civil Liability for Bunker Oil Pollution Damage (the “Bunker Convention”) in addition to local and national environmental laws.
The Bunker Convention entered into force in 2008 and imposes strict liability on shipowners for pollution damage and response costs incurred in contracting States caused by discharges, or threatened discharges, of bunker oil from all classes of ships not covered by the CLC. The Bunker Convention also requires registered owners of ships over a certain tonnage to maintain insurance to cover their liability for pollution damage in an amount equal to the limits of liability under the applicable national or international limitation regime, including liability limits calculated in accordance with the Convention on Limitation of Liability for Maritime Claims 1976, as amended (the “1976 Convention”). As of January 31, 2023, the Bunker Convention had 105 contracting States, representing 95.20% of the gross tonnage of the world’s merchant fleet.
The 1976 Convention is the most widely applicable international regime limiting maritime pollution liability. Rights to limit liability under the 1976 Convention are forfeited where a spill is caused by a shipowner’s intentional or reckless conduct. Certain jurisdictions have ratified the IMO’s Protocol of 1996 to the 1976 Convention, referred to herein as the “Protocol of 1996.” The Protocol of 1996 provides for substantially higher liability limits in those jurisdictions than the limits set forth in the 1976 Convention.
Finally, some jurisdictions, such as all of the countries of the Hidrovia Region, are not parties to either the 1976 Convention or the Protocol of 1996, and, therefore, a shipowner’s rights to limit liability for maritime pollution in such jurisdictions may be uncertain or subject to national and local law.
50 |
International Safety Regulations
Navios Logistics’ vessels also must operate in compliance with the requirements set forth in the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea, as amended (“SOLAS”), including the International Safety Management Code (the “ISM Code”), which is contained in Chapter IX of SOLAS. SOLAS was enacted primarily to promote the safety of life and preservation of property. SOLAS, and the regulations and codes of practice thereunder, is regularly amended to introduce heightened shipboard safety requirements into the industry.
The ISM Code requires ship operators to develop and maintain an extensive Safety Management System (“SMS”) that includes the adoption of a safety and environmental protection policy setting forth instructions and procedures for safe vessel operation and describing procedures for dealing with emergencies. The ISM Code also requires vessel operators to obtain a Document of Compliance (“DOC”) demonstrating that the company complies with the SMS and a Safety Management Certificate (“SMC”) for each vessel verifying compliance with the approved SMS by each vessel’s flag state. No vessel can obtain an SMC unless its manager has been awarded a Document of Compliance, issued by the vessel’s flag state for the vessel, under the ISM Code.
Non-compliance with the ISM Code and regulations contained in other IMO conventions may subject a shipowner to increased liability, lead to decreases in available insurance coverage for affected vessels, or result in the denial of access to, or detention in, certain ports, which can cause delays. For example, the United States Coast Guard and EU authorities have indicated that vessels not in compliance with the ISM Code may be prohibited from trading in ports in the United States and the EU. Each company’s DOC and each vessel’s SMC must be periodically renewed, and compliance must be periodically verified.
Maritime Decarbonization: Energy Efficiency and Greenhouse Gas Reduction
IMO’s Initial Strategy and Recent Developments
The IMO now has mandatory measures for an international greenhouse gas (“GHG”) reduction regime for a global industry sector, and recent activity indicates continued interest and regulation in this area in the coming years.
On 13 April 2018, the IMO’s Marine Environment Protection Committee (“MEPC”) 72 adopted resolution MEPC.304 (72) on Initial IMO Strategy on reduction of GHG emissions from ships. The initial strategy aims to reduce GHG emissions from shipping by 40% by 2030 when compared to 2008 levels. No international regulations have been implemented to achieve such a reduction.
The IMO’s initial strategy targeted both reducing gross output and efficiency. In order to reduce emissions and increase shipboard efficiency, the IMO is coordinating ways to measure these approaches. This will be done in two ways. First, the technical aspects and design of vessels will be regulated by the new Energy Efficiency Existing Ships Index (“EEXI”) for existing ships. EEXI regulations exist for an “Attained EEXI” to be calculated for each ship, and a “Required EEXI” for specified ship types. Second, the operational aspect will be done by way of the new Carbon Intensity Indicators (“CII”) index, which categorizes every ship’s operational efficiency based upon Data Collection Service information. Aspects of a vessel’s CII will need to be documented under the existing framework of the Ship Energy Efficiency Management Plan (“SEEMP”). Ships of 5,000 GT and above were required to revise their SEEMP before January 1, 2023.
In June 2021, MEPC 76 developed various short-term (2018–2023), medium-term (2023–2030), and long-term (2030–2050) measures. It approved a three-phase work plan aimed at supporting the Initial IMO Strategy on Reduction of GHG from Ships and its program of follow-up actions: Phase I – Collation and initial consideration of proposals for measures (Time period: Spring 2021 to Spring 2022); Phase II – Assessment and selection of measures to further develop (Time period: Spring 2022 to Spring 2023); and Phase III – Development of measures to be finalized with agreed target dates (Timeline: Target date(s) to be agreed in conjunction with the IMO Strategy on reduction of GHG emissions from ships).
MARPOL Annex VI amendments entered into force on November 1, 2022, and requirements for EEXI and CII certification went into effect on January 1, 2023. The first annual reporting will be completed in 2023, with the first rating given in 2024. A review clause requires the IMO to review the effectiveness of the implementation of the CII and EEXI requirements, by January 1, 2026, at the latest, and, if necessary, develop and adopt further amendments.
51 |
MEPC 79 has made progress towards revising the Initial IMO GHG Strategy, working towards adopting a strengthened revised Strategy in mid-2023 at MEPC 80. A final draft Revised IMO GHG Strategy would be considered by MEPC 80 (scheduled to meet July 3-7, 2023), with a view to adoption. The MEPC 79 session also took further steps to address GHG emissions. In particular, the session adopted amendments to designate the Mediterranean Sea, as a whole, as an Emission Control Area for Sulphur Oxides and Particulate Matter, under MARPOL Annex VI. In such an Emission Control Area, the limit for sulphur in fuel oil used on board ships is 0.10% mass by mass (m/m), while outside these areas the limit is 0.50% m/m. The amendment is expected to enter into force on May 1, 2024, with the new limit taking effect from 1 May 1, 2025. The session also adopted amendments to MARPOL Annex VI to include information on the flashpoint of fuel in the Bunker Delivery Note. The session also discussed on board carbon capture and storage, but the committee deferred the issue to MEPC 80.
Green House Gas (GHG) Regulations
In February 2005, the Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (the “UNFCCC”) entered into force. Pursuant to the Kyoto Protocol, adopting countries are required to implement national programs to reduce emissions of certain greenhouse gases, generally referred to as GHGs, which are suspected of contributing to global warming. Currently, GHG emissions from international shipping do not come under the Kyoto Protocol.
The IMO has developed and intends to continue developing limits on GHG emissions. The IMO is also considering its position on market-based measures through an expert working group. Among the numerous proposals being considered by the working group are the following: a port State levy based on the amount of fuel consumed by the vessel on its voyage to the port in question; and a global emissions trading scheme which would allocate emissions allowances and set an emissions cap, among others. The IMO’s goal is to reduce total annual GHG emissions by at least 50% by 2050 compared to 2008, while at the same time, pursuing efforts towards phasing them out entirely.
Additionally, jurisdictions throughout the world have examined means of regulating GHGs.
Vessel & Port Security – the ISPS Code
In 2002, following the September 11 terrorist attacks, SOLAS was amended to impose detailed security obligations on vessels and port authorities, most of which are contained in the International Ship and Port Facility Security Code (“ISPS Code”), which is Chapter XI-2 of SOLAS. Vessels demonstrate compliance with the ISPS Code by having an International Ship Security Certificate issued by their flag state.
Among the various requirements are:
• | On-board installation of automatic information systems to enhance vessel-to-vessel and vessel-to-shore communications; |
• | On-board installation of ship security alert systems; |
• | Development of Vessel Security Plans; |
• | Appointment of a Ship Security Officer and a Company Security Officer; and |
• | Compliance with flag state’s security certification requirements. |
International Convention on Liability and Compensation for Damage in Connection with the Carriage of Hazardous and Noxious Substances by Sea (HNS)
In the future the HNS Convention 1996 and its Protocol of 2010 might come into force. The HNS is based on the model of the CLC and Fund Conventions but in only one convention and will as well establish a two-tier system for compensation to be paid in the event of accidents at sea, in this case, involving hazardous and noxious substances such as chemicals. But it covers not only pollution damage but also the risks of fire and explosion, including loss of life or personal injury as well as loss of or damage to property.
52 |
International convention on Oil Pollution Preparedness, Response and Co-operation (OPRC)
The country party to this convention must establish measures in order to prevent and minimize oil pollution. Furthermore, vessels must have and carry on board oil pollution emergency plan. Ships must report pollution incidents to the Coastguards authorities. The Convention also calls for the establishment of stocks of oil spill combating equipment, establishing oil spill combating exercises and the development of detailed plans for dealing with pollution incidents.
Conventions and Laws Impacting the Countries of the Hidrovia Region
Hidrovia Convention — (RIOCON)
The Hidrovia Region countries are in discussion to standardize all requirements and regulations relating to pollution from vessels. The CIH (Comite Intergubernamental de la Hidrovia) is developing a new convention named RIOCON (an adapted version of MARPOL). Additional or new conventions, laws and regulations may be adopted that could adversely affect its ability to manage its ships.
Title VII of the Navigation and Security Protocol of RIOCON, applies to the prevention, reduction and control of pollution from vessels in the Hidrovia Region.
Other Laws Applicable in the Hidrovia Region
Beyond RIOCON, countries in the Hidrovia Region have domestic laws related to oil pollution, for example.
• | Argentina: Pursuant to section 41 of the Argentine National Constitution as amended in 1994, all citizens have the right to a healthy environment, balanced and apt for human development so that the productive activities satisfy current needs without harming future generations and citizens and companies have the duty to preserve it. In addition, section 41 states that the damage will generate the duty to remedy the environment. The Water Pollution Prevention & Surveillance Act (22.190) prohibits the dumping of oil in the waterways and establishes rules for the prevention of pollution of waterways and other elements of the environment by pollutant agents from vessels and naval devices. This Act also makes an owner and a “disponent owner” of a vessel (i.e., the person or company that has commercial control over a vessel’s operations without owning the vessel) that causes pollution strictly liable for any clean-up costs and imposes fines for violations. The Dangerous Waste Act (24.051) regulates the creation, handling, transport and final disposal of dangerous waste and makes the owner and/or guardian of the waste strictly liable and imposes fines and/or imprisonment for violations. The National Environmental Policy Act (25.675) establishes the minimum budgets needed to achieve sustainable and adequate management of the environment, makes the person who causes the environmental damage strictly liable, and states that activities that could pollute the environment must be insured. Chapter VIII of the REGINAVE (Maritime, River and Lake Navigation Regime) also governs environmental issues and imposes fines for violations. In addition, as of August 1, 2015, a new Civil and Commercial Code is in force in Argentina. Said new code states that the owner or the keeper of dangerous or vicious objects or the person who profits from such activities, shall be liable for the resultant damages (section 1757 and others). |
• | Bolivia: A carrier is in principle liable for any pollution damage caused by cargo carried under its care. This liability may be extended to the cargo owner. |
• | Brazil: The Brazilian legal framework which governs marine pollution incidents encompasses several infra-constitutional Laws and regulations, the main statutes being: Law no. 6.938/81 (Brazilian National Policy on the Environment); Law no. 7.347/1985 (which regulates the Civil Public Action); Law no. 9.966/2000 (“Oil Law”); Law no. 9.605/98 (Environmental Crimes Law); and the Decree no. 83,540/79, which regulates the Decree that gave the force. In 1992, Brazil signed the Acuerdo de Transporte Fluvial por la Hidrovia Paraguay-Parana, together with Argentina, Bolivia, Paraguay and Uruguay, in order to develop the Hidrovía Paraguay-Paraná. In December 1997, Brazil signed together with Argentina an Agreement on Environmental Cooperation, which fosters the cooperation to preserve the marine environment, especially with respect the pollution of coastal areas. |
According to the aforementioned legislation, liability for environmental pollution damages in Brazil can be assessed in three different spheres: civil; administrative; and criminal. Insofar as the liability regime for civil damages caused to the environment or to affected third parties by oil pollution, this is one of joint strict liability, i.e. the owner and its insurer, as well as any other guarantor, are jointly liable for damages, independent of fault, based on Article 14, §1º, of Law no. 6.938/81 and Article 9, §2º of the Decree no. 83.540/79. Limitation of liability as set out in the CLC-69 is not applicable in Brazil. Insofar as administrative liability, according to Article 25 of the Oil Law, in the event of oil pollution damages, the following parties can be held administratively liable for the above-mentioned fines: the shipowner; the shipowner’s legal representative; the ship operator; the concessionaire; the master or crewman; the representatives of the port, terminal, platform, shipyard or marina; and the cargo owner. According to the same article, the administrative penalties can vary from simple warnings to fines in total up to R$50 million. Brazil is party to the 1990 International Convention on Oil Pollution Preparedness, Response and Co-operation.
53 |
• | Paraguay: The Constitution of Paraguay regulates protection of the environment and the carrier, the cargo owners and any persons connected to a spill or pollution incident may be held strictly liable, jointly and severally. Paraguay, together with all the countries of the MERCOSUR has signed the Framework Agreement on Environment (2003), which also promotes the environmental protection within the area. |
• | Uruguay: Uruguay enacted Law n° 16.688, in order to regulate the prevention and surveillance of pollution in Uruguayan waters. This law provides for strict, joint and several liability of owners and disponent owners of vessels or other floating devices, aircrafts and shore and off-shore crafts or installations that cause pollution for any damages and cleanup costs and imposes fines in case of violations. Act n° 13.833 forbids dumping hydrocarbons and any harmful substance and imposes fines and other penalties in case of infringement. |
Separately, the Vina del Mar Agreement on Port State Control is in force in Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Colombia, Chile, Cuba, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico, Panama, Peru, Republica Dominicana, Uruguay and Venezuela. This agreement enables state port authorities to supervise vessels reaching their ports. This agreement establishes a closer collaboration among the maritime authorities in the region to coordinate port state control measures for foreign-flag vessels that visit their ports. The principal objective is the commitment of the maritime authorities in the region to maintaining an effective inspection system to ensure compliance with safety and pollution prevention requirements contained in international conventions.
And, finally, Argentina and Brazil are part of the International Convention Relating to Intervention on the High Seas in Cases of Oil Pollution Casualties 1969. This convention states the right of coastal States to take necessary measures on the high seas to prevent, mitigate or eliminate grave and imminent danger to their coastline or related interests from pollution or threat of pollution of the sea by oil, following a maritime casualty or acts related to such a casualty. In addition, Brazil has acceded to the 1973 Protocol that amend the 1969 Convention.
Inspections
A variety of governmental and private entities subject our vessels to both scheduled and unscheduled inspections. Wrongdoing or deficiencies discovered in the course of inspections can result in fines, penalties, delays in the loading, offloading or delivery of cargo, or even the seizure of its vessels or their cargoes. The primary inspection programs to which we are subject are described below.
Inspection by Classification Societies
Every ocean-going vessel must be inspected and approved by a classification society in order to be flagged in a specific country, obtain liability insurance and legally operate. The classification society certifies that the vessel is “in class,” signifying that the vessel has been built and maintained in accordance with the rules of the classification society and complies with applicable rules and regulations of the vessel’s country of registry and the international conventions to which that country is a party. In addition, where surveys are required by international conventions and corresponding laws and ordinances of a flag state, the classification society will often undertake them on application or by official order, acting on behalf of the vessel’s flag administration.
The classification society also undertakes on request other surveys and checks that are required by regulations and requirements of the flag state or port authority. These surveys are subject to agreements made in each individual case or to the regulations of the country concerned.
For maintenance of the class, regular and extraordinary surveys of hull, machinery, including the electrical plant, and any special equipment classed are required to be performed subject to statutory requirements mandated by SOLAS as follows:
Annual Surveys. For certain ships, annual surveys are conducted for the hull and the machinery (including the electrical plant) and, where applicable, for special equipment classed, at intervals of 12 months from the date of commencement of the class period indicated in the certificate.
Intermediate Surveys. Extended annual surveys are referred to as intermediate surveys and typically are conducted two and a half years after commissioning and each class renewal. Intermediate surveys may be carried out on the occasion of the second or third annual survey.
54 |
Class Renewal Surveys: Class renewal surveys, also known as special surveys, are carried out for the ship’s hull, machinery, (including the electrical plant), and for any special equipment classed, at the intervals indicated by the character of classification for the hull. At the special survey, the vessel is thoroughly examined, including audio-gauging to determine the thickness of the steel structures. Should the thickness be found to be less than class requirements, the classification society would prescribe steel renewals. The classification society may grant a one-year grace period for completion of the special survey. Substantial amounts of funds may have to be spent for steel renewals to pass a special survey if the vessel experiences excessive wear and tear. In lieu of the special survey every four or five years, depending on whether a grace period was granted, a shipowner has the option of arranging with the classification society for the vessel’s machinery to be on a continuous survey cycle, in which every part of the vessel would be surveyed within a five-year cycle.
All of our product tankers vessels are certified as being “in class.” For inland waterways navigation, class is not mandatory; although most insurance underwriters and oil major vetting department require class certificates (by a classification society which is a member of the International Association of Classification Societies). Navios Logistics was among the first owners operating in the Hidrovia Region offering barges and pushboats with class certificates. Presently, Navios Logistics has almost the complete inland fleet under class. For the inland fleet, the statutory certificates are issued directly by the flag authority.
Its inland fleet is subject to regularly scheduled drydocking and special surveys which are carried out up to every eight years. Currently, our inland fleet is scheduled for intermediate surveys and special surveys as follows: Special Drydock every six years for pushboats and every eight years for barges and Afloat Intermediate Inspection in the middle of each six for pushboats and every two years for barges. All areas subject to survey as defined by the classification society are required to be surveyed at least once per class period, unless shorter intervals between surveys are prescribed elsewhere. Most seagoing vessels are also drydocked every 30 to 36 months for inspection of the underwater parts and for repairs related to inspections. River units are only drydocked up to every six or eight years for inspection of the underwater parts and for repairs related to inspections. If any defects are found, the classification surveyor will issue a “recommendation” which must be rectified by the vessel owner during the survey or within prescribed time limits.
SIRE Inspections
One of the most significant safety initiatives to be introduced by the OCIMF, an oil industry trade group focusing on the promotion of safety and pollution prevention from tankers and at oil terminals, is the Ship Inspection Report Program (SIRE). This program was originally launched in 1993 to specifically address concerns about substandard shipping. The SIRE Program is a unique tanker risk assessment tool of value to charterers, ship operators, terminal operators and government bodies concerned with ship safety.
The SIRE system is a very large database of up-to-date information about tankers. Essentially, SIRE has focused tanker industry awareness on the importance of meeting satisfactory tanker quality and ship safety standards. Since its introduction, the SIRE Program has received industry-wide acceptance and participation by both OCIMF members, SIRE Program participants and by ship operators. The expansion of barges and small vessels into SIRE was inaugurated in late 2004.
The SIRE program requires a uniform inspection protocol that is predicated by the following:
• | Vessel Inspection Questionnaire |
• | Barges Inspection Questionnaire |
• | Uniform SIRE Inspection Report |
• | Vessels Particulars Questionnaire |
• | Barge Particulars Questionnaire |
• | SIRE Enhanced Report Manager |
These features have been established to make the program more uniform and user friendly and to provide a level of transparency unique in the marine transportation industry.
SIRE has established itself as a major source of technical and operational information to prospective charterers and other program users. Its increasing use corresponds with oil industry efforts to better ascertain whether vessels are well managed and maintained.
Inspection reports are maintained on the index for a period of 12 months from the date of receipt and are maintained on the database for two years. SIRE inspection reports for our tankers are available on the database.
SIRE access is available, at a nominal cost, to OCIMF members, bulk oil terminal operators, port authorities, canal authorities, and oil, power, industrial or oil trader companies that charter tankers and barges as a normal part of their business. It is also available, free of charge, to governmental bodies which supervise safety and/or pollution prevention in respect of oil tankers/barges (e.g., port state control authorities, etc).
55 |
Inspection by Oil Major Vetting Departments
For the past several years the oil majors have created their own vetting departments in order to carry out their own surveys. These surveys are made by their own or external surveyors with SIRE I accreditation. Some oil majors have requirements that exceed the IMO and OCIMF requirements. YPF, for example, mandates the use of an IGS (Inert Gas System) for vessels below 20,000 dwt carrying clean products that have a flash point below 60 degrees Celsius. This requirement requires us to install IGSs in our vessels, although not compulsory under international regulations. Navios Logistics has successfully satisfied the operational, safety, environmental and technical vetting criteria of Axion Energy, YPF and Petrobras, and have qualified to do business with them.
TMSA Program
OCIMF’s Tanker Management and Self Assessment (“TMSA”) program was introduced in 2004 as a tool to help vessel operators assess, measure and improve their management systems. The TMSA program has been expanded to encompass all tank vessel operators, including those managing coastal vessels and barges. The program encourages vessel operators to assess their safety management systems against listed key performance indicators and provides best practice guidance to minimize the possibility of problems reoccurring. Because non-SOLAS vessels are not subject to the ISM Code, operators of such vessels may use this guide as a tool to measure and improve their operations. A company that incorporates the guidelines contained in the TMSA into their management system may be considered as having an active assessment process, even if not being inspected under the SIRE scheme or having ISM as a management system. Vessel operators can use their assessment results to develop a phased improvement plan that improves safety and environmental performance. Although the TMSA program provides guidance, responsibility for vessel operations, and distribution of this data, lies exclusively with the vessel operator. The TMSA program builds upon the ISM Code and can provide valuable feedback to the charterer on the effectiveness of the vessel operator’s management system. Navios Logistics has currently upgraded to TMSA 3.
Economic Sanctions and Compliance
We constantly monitor developments in the U.S., the EU and other jurisdictions that maintain economic sanctions against Iran, Russian entities, Venezuela, other countries, and other sanctions targets, including developments in implementation and enforcement of such sanctions programs. Expansion of sanctions programs, embargoes and other restrictions in the future (including additional designations of countries and persons subject to sanctions), or modifications in how existing sanctions are interpreted or enforced, could prevent our vessels from calling in ports in sanctioned countries or could limit their cargoes.
Iran Sanctions
There is a divergence in the US and EU/UK position on Iran following the US withdrawal from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action
EU and UK sanctions
EU sanctions on Iran remain in place in relation to the export of arms and military goods listed in the EU Common Military List,military-related goods and items that might be used for internal repression as well as in relation to listed individuals / entities. Full details of these goods can be found in the EU Common Military List and the consolidated EU Council Regulation 267/2012 and EU Council Regulation 359/2011 (each as amended from time to time).
Trade with Iran which is caught by the abovementioned sanctions can only be engaged if prior authorization (granted on a case-by-case basis) is obtained from the relevant national authorities within the EU. The remaining restrictions apply to the sale, supply, transfer or export, of specific listed goods directly or indirectly to any Iranian person/for use in Iran, as well as the provision of technical assistance, financing or financial assistance in relation to the restricted activity. Certain individuals and entities remain sanctioned and the prohibition to make available, directly or indirectly, economic resources or assets to or for the benefit of sanctioned parties remains. “Economic resources” is widely defined and it remains prohibited to provide vessels for a fixture from which a sanctioned party (or parties related to a sanctioned party) directly or indirectly benefits. It is therefore still necessary to carry out due diligence on the parties and cargoes involved in fixtures involving Iran.
The UK imposes similar sanctions to the EU in circumstances where there has not been a significant shift in the Iran sanctions regime following the UK’s departure from the EU.
56 |
U.S. Sanctions
U.S. economic sanctions on Iran fall into two general categories: “Primary” sanctions, which prohibit U.S. persons or U.S. companies and their foreign branches, U.S. citizens, foreign owned or controlled subsidiaries, U.S. permanent residents, persons within the territory of the United States from engaging in all direct and indirect trade and other transactions with Iran without U.S. government authorization, and U.S. “secondary” sanctions, which apply to non-U.S. persons.
The current secondary sanctions in place with respect to Iran, are relatively expansive and include but are not limited to: (i) sanctions on the Iranian metals industry, (ii) sanctions on Iran’s shipping and shipbuilding sectors, (iii) sanctions on the Iranian energy industry, which includes the petroleum and petrochemicals industries, and (iv) sanctions on the Iranian construction mining, manufacturing, and textiles industry. These secondary sanctions prohibit significant transactions involving the sale, supply, or transfer of goods or services used in connection with any of the aforementioned industries and sectors of Iran’s economy. While the aforementioned secondary sanctions have the widest application to the international shipping community, there are numerous other secondary sanctions imposed against Iran.
Russia Sanctions
As a result of the crisis in Ukraine and the annexation of Crimea by Russia in 2014, both the United States and the EU implemented sanctions in 2014 against Crimea and certain Russian individuals and entities. These sanctions which are still in force have been greatly expanded and fortified due to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. The United States, the EU, the UK, and other nations have imposed expanded economic sanctions against certain Russian individuals, entities and business sectors. Among other things, these sanctions suspend the use of SWIFT for certain Russian banks, curtail Russian access to the sanctioning-countries’ credit markets, forbid Russian aircraft from flying over NATO and other airspace, impose wide ranging trade sanctions in respect of certain Russian exports and prohibit the export of many items to Russia and their provision to persons in Russia.
EU Sanctions
Since 2014, the EU has imposed travel bans and asset freezes on certain Russian persons and entities pursuant to which it is prohibited to make available, directly or indirectly, economic resources or assets to or for the benefit of the sanctioned parties. Other entities are subject to sectoral sanctions, which limit the provision of equity financing and loans to the listed entities. Additionally, various restrictions on trade have been implemented, including a prohibition on the import into the EU of goods originating in Crimea or Sevastopol or the provision of goods to Crimea/Sevastopol. This includes certain Russian seaports where restrictions would prevent a vessel from calling at the port.
Since February 2022, the EU has designated a significant number of individuals and entities as subject to an asset freeze. Notably a number of trading companies have sought to distance themselves from the involvement of sanctioned persons and caution must therefore be exercised when dealing with any Russian individual or entity with appropriate due diligence carried out in accordance with company procedures.
In particular, the EU has widened existing trade sanctions in relation to Russia including by (i) restricting exports of. dual-use and military, and various other advanced technologies, (ii) various restrictions on financial services (including a ban on certain banks from using the SWIFT system), (iii) prohibitions against any transactions with certain state-owned entities, and (iv) various trade and transport restrictions for both export and import of goods, including in relation to oil and petroleum products, coal, steel/iron, fertilisers, potash and luxury goods. The EU has also extended its restrictions to capture (i) various services, including business management services, accounting, architectural and engineering, and legal advice services, and (ii) trade with newly annexed regions of Ukraine (Donetsk, Kherson, Luhansk and Zaporizhzhia).
Lastly, the E.U. has also recently implemented price cap policies with respect to with respect to Russian-origin crude oil and petroleum products.
57 |
US Sanctions
U.S. sanctions against Russia were initially imposed following Russia’s annexation of Crimea in 2014 and have been greatly expanded in the last year following Russia’s full invasion of Ukraine. The current sanctions against Russia include full blocking sanctions, an investment ban/trade embargo with respect to certain commodities, sectoral sanctions aimed at certain sectors of the Russian economy, and sanctions with respect to “Covered Regions” in Ukraine. In addition, the majority of the U.S. sanctions against Russia also authorize the imposition of secondary sanctions against any deemed to have materially assisted any persons or entities sanctioned pursuant to the Russian sanctions program. We also note there is a broad carveout to the U.S. sanctions against Russia for transactions involving agricultural commodities.
Additionally, the U.S. has also designated various sectors of the Russian economy for blocking sanctions pursuant to E.O. 14024, including notably the marine sector. Pursuant to this sector designation, the U.S. has the ability to designate to the SDN list any individual or entity determined to be operating or have operated in the marine sector of the Russian economy.
The U.S. has also imposed in E.O. 14066 a prohibition against the importation of Russian-origin petroleum products into the United States. This prohibition encompasses shipments of Russian-origin commodities such as crude oil, petroleum fuels, petroleum, oils and products of their distillation, coal and coal products, and liquified natural gas. E.O. 14066 also prohibits U.S. persons from financing, approving, facilitating, or guaranteeing a transaction of a foreign person where the transaction by that person would be prohibited under the E.O. if that person were a U.S. person. E.O. 14066 also prohibits new investment by U.S. persons in the Russian energy sector. The United States has also issued Executive Order 14071, a complete prohibition on new investment in Russia by a U.S. person.
On November 22, 2022, the United States Department of the Treasury, announced determinations, pursuant to Executive Order 14071, which prohibit the provision of trading/commodities broker, financing, shipping, insurance, flagging, and customs brokering services as they relate to the maritime transport of crude oil and petroleum products of Russian Federation origin (collectively “Covered Services”). The Treasury Department, in coordination with other G7 states, the European, Union, and Australia, authorized the provision of the foregoing services when the price of Russian-origin crude oil does not exceed a certain price, as determined by the Secretary of the Treasury, effectively creating price caps on Russian-origin crude oil and petroleum products. Effective December 5, 2022, the Secretary of the Treasury and other members of the price cap coalition set the price cap on Russian-origin crude oil at $60 per barrel. Effective February 5, 2023, the Secretary of the Treasury set the price cap on Discount to Russian-origin crude petroleum products at $45 per barrel and the price cap on Premium to Russian-origin crude petroleum products at $100 per barrel. The discount to crude price cap applies to naphtha, residual fuel oil, and waste oils, whereas the premium to crude price cap applies to gasoline, motor fuel blending stock, gasoil and diesel fuel, kerosene and kerosene-type jet fuel, and vacuum gas oil. While these price cap policies are not directed specifically at Navios, they could have some impact on our trade, in particular with respect to obtaining“Covered Services” in the U.S. or by U.S. persons.
UK Sanctions
Since the UK’s departure from the EU it has enacted its own sanctions regime, which although in parts mirrors the approach of the EU, is a distinct sanctions regime. Again from February 2022 further restrictions were imposed targeting Russia and those connected to the invasion of Ukraine. Care should be taken to identify where the regimes differ.
UK restrictions similarly include designation of individuals as subject to an asset freeze and travel ban as well as restrictions in relation to the export, supply, delivery and making available of certain goods. There is also a ban on Russian flagged or owned ships from entering UK ports and lastly, the UK has also recently implemented price cap policies with respect to Russian-origin crude oil and petroleum products.
Venezuela Sanctions
EU and UK sanctions
EU sanctions against Venezuela are primarily governed by EU Council Regulation 2017/2063 (as amended from time to time) concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Venezuela. This includes financial sanctions and restrictions on listed persons and an, arms embargo, and related prohibitions and restrictions including restrictions on items related to internal repression.
The UK imposes similar sanctions to the EU in circumstances where there has not been a significant shift in the Venezuela sanctions regime following the UK’s departure from the EU.
U.S. Sanctions
The U.S. sanctions against Venezuela mainly consist of primary sanctions aimed at U.S. persons and activities within the United States and does not contain broad secondary sanctions aimed at non-U.S. persons such as Navios. However, there are a number of components of the U.S. sanctions against Venezuela that impact the international shipping community as will be discussed below.
First, E.O. 13850 authorizes sanctions against anyone determined to operate in designated sectors of the Venezuela economy. The designated sectors consist of the gold, oil, financial, and security/defense sectors. This E.O. is pertinent because it has been used in the past to sanction vessels and vessel-owning companies engaged in the trade of Venezuelan oil. E.O. 13850 also authorizes sanctions against anyone who is determined to have provided material assistance, goods or services to a SDN who is designated under E.O. 13850.
58 |
Second, E.O. 13884 blocked the Government of Venezuela and all entities 50% or more owned by the Government of Venezuela. Under E.O. 13884, unless exempt or authorized by OFAC, the property and interests in property of persons meeting the definition of the “Government of Venezuela” that are in, or come within, the United States or the possession or control of a United States person are blocked. However, while the Government of Venezuela entities are blocked, they are not necessarily also designated to the SDN list. The prohibitions set forth in E.O. 13884 apply to Navios only with respect to voyages involving U.S. persons or activities within the United States.
Other E.U., UK, and U.S. Economic Sanctions Targets
The EU and UK also maintain sanctions against Syria, North Korea, Belarus and certain other countries and against individuals listed by the EU/UK. These restrictions apply to our operations and as such, to the extent that these countries may be involved in any business it is important to carry out checks to ensure compliance with all relevant restrictions and to carry out due diligence checks on counterparties and cargoes.”
The United States maintains comprehensive economic sanctions against various other countries, including Syria, Cuba and North Korea, as well as sanctions against entities and individuals (such as entities and individuals in the foregoing targeted countries, designated terrorists, narcotics traffickers) whose names appear on the List of SDNs and Blocked Persons maintained by the U.S. Treasury Department (collectively, the “Sanctions Targets”) and sanctions targeting particular industries (including the potash industry in Belarus). We are subject to the prohibitions of these sanctions to the extent that any transaction or activity we engage in involves Sanctions Targets and a U.S. person or otherwise has a nexus to the United States.
Risk of Loss and Liability Insurance
General
The operation of any cargo vessel includes significant risks, such as perils of navigable waters, mechanical failure of the vessel, physical damage suffered by the vessel due to explosion, fire or collision, the loss of property on board, loss or damage to cargo, business interruption, hostilities, crew and third party accidents, labor strikes, etc. In addition, there is always an inherent possibility of marine disasters like oil spillages and other environmental mishaps arising from owning and operating vessels in the international trade. Despite potential risks out of the scope of the current coverage, Navios Logistics believes that its present insurance set of coverage is adequate and represents the average insurance level of any well-known maritime company. Navios Logistics contracts with high-quality insurance companies that are leaders in the industry.
Hull and Machinery and War Risk Insurances
Navios Logistics has marine hull and machinery and war risk insurance, which provides coverage for partial damage arising from mechanical failure (tugs and vessels only), fire, explosion, stranding, collision and grounding, as well as in case of actual or constructive total loss, for all the fleet. Each of the owned vessels is covered according to inland industry standards. Coverage is placed with Global Leading Underwriters.
Protection and Indemnity Insurance
Protection and indemnity (“P&I”) insurance is provided by mutual protection and indemnity associations, also known as P&I Clubs. This insurance covers third-party liabilities in connection with its shipping activities. P&I insurance is intended to cover a range of incidents, including, but not limited to, third-party liability and other related expenses arising from injury, illness or death of crew and other third parties, the loss of or damage to cargo, claims arising from collisions with other vessels, damage to third-party property, such as buoys, piers or bridges, pollution liabilities arising from oil or other substances, towage liabilities or wreck removal of the insured unit. Coverage is provided in accordance with the association’s rules and the members terms of entry subject to a limit of such sums as are provided by the International Group’s reinsurance and overspill arrangements in force at that time but currently not less than $3.1 billion for each accident or occurrence except for oil pollution liabilities which are limited to $1.0 billion for each accident or occurrence. The 13 P&I associations that comprise the International Group insure approximately 95% of the world’s commercial tonnage and have entered into a pooling agreement to reinsure each association’s liabilities. As a member of a P&I association, which is a member of the International Group, Navios Logistics is subject to calls payable to the associations based on its claim records as well as the claim records of all other members of the individual associations, and members of the pool of P&I associations comprising the International Group.
59 |
Insurance for Port Activities
Navios Logistics maintains liability insurance for both its Dry Port Terminals and Liquid Port Terminal which covers costs and expenses arising from loss or damage to property of third parties (including loss or damage to cargo), injury or death of people involved in port activities and fire. Navios Logistics also maintains insurance for loss or damage to the port facilities and handling equipment, business interruption and strikes. Coverage is subject to customary limitations and deductibles
Environmental Insurance for Port Activities
We maintain civil liability for environmental damage caused by certain port activities. Specifically concerning Uruguayan regulations applicable to Nueva Palmira dry plant, Uruguayan Decree No. 413/992 sets forth legal, administrative, technical, and economic requirements to be met by companies providing port services, in order to qualify as such within the ports of Uruguay. Said companies must maintain a civil liability insurance covering claims and damages caused to individuals or the environment due to their service providing activities.
Cargo Insurance
Navios Logistics maintains insurance for loss or damage to liquid cargo (subject to customary limitations and deductibles) that Navios Logistics purchase, transport and for onwards sale to third parties.
Uninsured Risks
Not all risks are insured and not all risks are insurable. The principal insurable risks, which nonetheless remain uninsured across its business are “loss of hire,” “off-hire,” “strikes” (except for Port Activities where such risk is insured), “defense,” and “credit risk.” Navios Logistics did not insure against these risks because the costs are regarded as disproportionately high relative to the risks and/or such cover is not commercially beneficial or contractually necessary. The loss of hire or strike insurances provide, subject to a deductible, a limited indemnity for hire that would not be receivable by the shipowner for reasons set forth in such policies. Should a vessel on time charter, where the vessel is paid a fixed hire day-by-day, suffer a serious mechanical breakdown, the daily hire will no longer be payable by the charterer. The purpose of the loss of hire insurance is to secure the loss of hire during such periods. In the case of strike insurance, if a vessel is being paid a fixed sum to perform a voyage and the ship becomes strike-bound at a loading or discharging port, or the crew of the vessel goes on strike, the insurance covers the cost of running the vessel during such periods. The defense cover is intended to pay the cost of defending a member’s position in a dispute related to a contract signed with third parties. For example, if a charter party is signed and for any reason the vessel is placed off hire, the cover pays the fees of lawyers defending the member’s position, but not the amount in dispute.
Risk Management
Risk management in the river and ports logistics industry involves balancing a number of factors in a cyclical and potentially volatile environment. Fundamentally, the challenge is to appropriately allocate capital to competing opportunities of owning or chartering vessels and in our port facilities. In part, this requires a view of the overall health of the market, as well as an understanding of capital costs and returns.
Navios Logistics seeks to manage risk through a number of strategies, including vessel control strategies (chartering and ownership) and freight carriage. Its vessel control strategies include seeking the appropriate mix of owned vessels, long- and short-term chartered-in vessels, coupled with purchase options, when available, and spot charters. Navios Logistics also enters into CoAs, which gives us, subject to certain limitations, the flexibility to determine the means of getting a particular cargo to its destination. In its Liquid Port Terminal (Petrosan), its strategy involves the analysis of market opportunities in order to buy and sell refined petroleum products, and to manage the appropriate mix in storage of owned and third-party products.
Legal Proceedings
The Company is subject to legal proceedings, claims and contingencies arising in the ordinary course of business. When such amounts can be estimated and the contingency is probable, management accrues the corresponding liability. While the ultimate outcome of lawsuits or other proceedings against us cannot be predicted with certainty, management does not believe the costs, individually or in aggregate, of such actions will have a material effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
60 |
Commitments and Contingencies
Navios Logistics has issued a guarantee and indemnity letter that guarantees the performance by Petrolera San Antonio S.A. (a consolidated subsidiary) of all its obligations to Vitol S.A. up to $12.0 million. This guarantee expired on March 1, 2023 and expects to be renewed under similar terms and conditions.
On July 22, 2016, Navios Logistics guaranteed the compliance of certain obligations related to Edolmix S.A. and Energías Renovables del Sur S.A. (“Enersur”) (entities wholly-owned by Navios Logistics) under their respective direct user agreements with the Free Zone of Nueva Palmira, for the amounts of $0.8 million and $0.5 million, respectively.
In September 2020, Navios Logistics agreed to a settlement regarding a storage and transshipment contract in the grain port terminal for a total amount to be paid to Navios Logistics as a result of the settlement of $4.1 million, which is collected in three equal installments of $1.4 million on June 1, 2021, 2022 and 2023. In June 2021 and 2022, Navios Logistics collected the first and second installments. For the year ended December 31, 2020, a gain of $4.1 million was included under the caption “Other income” in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income/(loss).
On April 28, 2022, Navios Logistics entered into a five year leasing contract for eight liquid barges to be delivered from the fourth quarter of 2022 through the second quarter of 2023. The lease contract is payable by 60 consecutive monthly payments of $26 thousands each, commencing with the delivery date of the applicable barge. At expiration, Navios Logistics will have the ability to exercise the purchase option of these barges or extend the term of the leasing contract. Please refer to Note 15 “Leases”, included elsewhere in this Annual Report.
Seasonality
Certain of Navios Logistics’ businesses have seasonality aspects, and seasonality affects the results of our operations and revenues, particularly in the first and last quarters of each year. With respect to the Dry Port Terminals operations in Uruguay, the high season is mainly from April to September, linked with the South American harvest and the arrival of barges down the river. The high season for the Barge Business is the period between February and July as a result of the South American harvest and higher river levels. During the South American late spring and summer, mainly from November to January, the low level of water in the northern Hidrovia Waterway could adversely affect our operations and volumes transported to the extent that water levels are not high enough to accommodate the draft of a heavily laden vessel. In that case, a vessel may be only partially loaded, generating lower revenue under agreements where revenue is based on volume of cargo loaded. Depending on water levels, such vessels could be prevented entirely from loading and navigating. In addition, low water levels create difficult navigation conditions, causing voyages to last longer and to incur increased voyage expenses. Such circumstances reduce the effective available carrying capacity of the vessel for the year. The Liquid Port Terminal and its Cabotage Business are not significantly affected by seasonality as their operations are primarily linked to refined petroleum products.
Employees and Crewing
Employees of the Manager provide assistance to us and our operating subsidiaries pursuant to the Administrative Services Agreement. Navios Holdings does not employ any staff. Navios Logistics crews its fleet with Argentine, Brazilian and Paraguayan officers and seamen. Navios Logistics’ fleet managers are responsible for selecting the crew. As of December 31, 2021, Navios Logistics employed 412 land-based employees: 27 employees in the Asuncion, Paraguay office, 53 employees at the port facility in San Antonio, Paraguay, 99 employees in the Buenos Aires, Argentina office, six employees in the Montevideo, Uruguay office, 215 employees at the Dry Port Terminals in Uruguay, and 12 employees in the Corumba, Brazil office and 577 seafarers as crew on our vessels.
Facilities
Our principal place of business is located at Strathvale House, 90 N Church Street, P.O. Box 309, Grand Cayman, KY1-1104 Cayman Islands. We presently occupy office space provided by the Manager. The Manager has agreed that it will make such office space, as well as certain office and secretarial services, available to us, as may be required by us from time to time. Previously, until the sale of the management division Navios Holdings and its affiliate companies leased various properties in Greece, Belgium, New York and Monaco.
61 |
Navios Logistics and its subsidiaries currently lease, (or occupy as free zone users, as the case may be), the following premises:
• | CNSA, as a free zone direct user at the Nueva Palmira Free Zone, holds the right to occupy the land on which it operates its port and transfer facilities, located at Zona Franca, Nueva Palmira, in Uruguay. CNSA has been authorized to operate as a free zone user on November 29, 1955 by a resolution of the Executive, who on September 27, 1956 approved an agreement, as required by applicable law at the time. On December 4, 1995, CNSA’s rights as a direct user have been renewed in a single free zone user agreement, which was subsequently amended on multiple occasions to reflect, among other things, the incorporation of new plots of land. On March 4, 2016, the extension of the agreement has been modified, allowing CNSA to install and operate a transfer station to handle and store goods, including raw manganese, minerals, grains and all types of liquid cargo and to build and operate a plant to receive, prepare and dry grain in the Nueva Palmira Free Zone. As a part of a restructuring process, on November 13, 2018, CNSA has modified its user agreement with the Free Zone of Nueva Palmira, returning to the Free Trade Zone the area in which the facilities of the grain port terminal were located, so that such area was subsequently assigned to Corporacion Navios Granos S.A. (“Granos”), another Navios Logistics’ subsidiary. By the means of the restructuring process, CNSA currently performs all activities related to transshipment and deposit of minerals, whereas Granos performs activities related to the transshipment and deposit of agro-commodities and grains. Under the aforementioned agreement, CNSA has the right of use of approximately 37 acres and pays a total fixed annual fee that amounts to $0.1 million, payable over eight consecutive months beginning in January of each year and increasing yearly in proportion to the variation in the U.S. Consumer Price Index corresponding to the previous year. There is also a transshipment fee of $0.25 per ton transshipped. CNSA has also assumed certain obligations with respect to improving the land subject to the agreement, and the agreement is terminable by the Free Zone Division in case there is a breach of the terms of said agreement, labor laws and social security contributions, and if CNSA commits illegal acts or acts expressly forbidden by the agreement. The agreement entered into between CNSA and the Free Zone expires on March 3, 2046, with a 20-year extension at our option, until 2066. |
• | As a consequence of the above-mentioned restructuring process, on November 13, 2018, Granos entered into a user agreement with the Free Zone of Nueva Palmira, having been authorized to operate as a direct free zone user, therefore being allowed to install and operate a transfer station to handle and store goods, including raw manganese, minerals, grains and all types of liquid cargo and to build and operate a plant to receive, prepare and dry grain in the Nueva Palmira Free Zone. By the means of said agreement, Granos currently has the right of use of approximately 46 acres and pays a total fixed annual fee that amounts to $0.2 million, payable over eight consecutive months beginning in January of each year and increasing yearly in proportion to the variation in the U.S. Consumer Price Index corresponding to the previous year. There is also a transshipment fee of $ 0.25 per ton transshipped. The agreement with the Free Zone expires on March 3, 2046, with a 20-year extension at our option, until 2066. |
• | On August 4, 2011, Enresur entered into a direct user agreement with the Free Zone of Nueva Palmira and subsequently, due to the acquisition of Enresur by Navios Logistics, such agreement has been revised by an amendment entered into with the Free Zone in July 22, 2016. Therefore, Enresur obtained an authorization to operate as a free zone user, being allowed to build, install and operate a system of handling, storage and treatment of materials in general and raw materials, including raw manganese, minerals, grains and all types of liquid cargo. As a consequence of the agreement, Enresur currently has the right of use of 27 acres and 9556 square meters and pays a total fixed annual fee that amounts to $0.1 million, payable over eight consecutive months beginning in January of each year and increasing yearly in proportion to the variation in the U.S. Consumer Price Index corresponding to the previous year. There is also a transshipment fee of $0.25 per ton transshipped. The agreement expires on July 22, 2046, with a 20-year extension at our option, until 2066. |
• | On December 29, 2008, Edolmix S.A. entered into a direct user agreement with the Free Zone of Nueva Palmira and, due to the acquisition of Edolmix by Navios Logistics in December 2014, such agreement has been revised by an amendment entered into with the Free Zone in July 22, 2016. Therefore, Edolmix has obtained an authorization to operate as a free zone user, being allowed to install and operate warehouses, silos, industrial facilities for the storage and handling of materials in general and raw materials, including raw manganese, minerals, grains and liquid cargo, containers and pallets; having being also authorized to install and operate a barge dock and a port terminal. As a consequence of the agreement, Edolmix currently has the right of use of 34.5 acres and 3,546 square meters and pays a total fixed annual fee that amounts to $0.1 million, payable over eight consecutive months beginning in January of each year and increasing yearly in proportion to the variation in the U.S. Consumer Price Index corresponding to the previous year. There is also a transshipment fee of $ 0.25 per ton transshipped. The agreement expires on July 22, 2046, with a 20-year extension at our option until 2066. |
• | Granos also leases approximately 204 square meters of office space at 2141 Paraguay, Montevideo, Uruguay, pursuant to a lease agreement that expires in November 2026. |
• | Compania Naviera Horamar S.A. leases approximately 409 square meters at 429 Cepeda Street, San Nicolás, Buenos Aires, Argentina, pursuant to a lease agreement that expires in November 30, 2023. |
62 |
• | Compania Naviera Horamar S.A. leases approximately 277 square meters of a warehouse located at 874 California Str., Buenos Aires, Argentina. The lease agreement expires on August 31, 2024. Compania Naviera Horamar S.A. also leases an apartment for the use of one of its employees located at 206 Nicasio Oroño, Rosario, Argentina. The lease agreement expires on October 31, 2023. |
• | Merco Par S.A.C.I. leases approximately 655 square meters of office space at Avenida Aviadores del Chaco No 1.669 corner San Martín, Asuncion, Paraguay, pursuant to a lease agreement that expires in October 2023. |
• | CNSA owns office premises in Montevideo, Uruguay. This space is approximately 112 square meters and is located at Juan Carlos Gomez 1445, Oficina 701, Montevideo 1100, Uruguay. |
• | Petrolera San Antonio S.A. owns the premises from which it operates in Avenida San Antonio, Paraguay. This space is approximately 146,744 square meters and is located between Avenida San Antonio and Virgen de Caacupe, San Antonio, Paraguay. |
• | Compania Naviera Horamar S.A. owns two storehouses located at 880 Calle California, Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina and at 791/795 Calle General Daniel Cerri, Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina of approximately 259 and 825 square meters, respectively. Compania Naviera Horamar S.A. also owns approximately 1,139 square meters of office space located in 846 Avenida Santa Fe, Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina. |
• | Petrovia Internacional S.A. owns three plots of land in Nueva Palmira, Uruguay, two of approximately 29 acres each and one of 23 acres. |
• | Hidronave South American Logistics leases an office space at 688, 15 De Novembro Street, Corumbá, Brazil, pursuant to a lease agreement that expired in May 2020 and was automatically renewed for an additional three years, extending the term until May 2023, according to the terms set forth in the lease agreement. |
• | Docas, in 2018, acquired a plot of land in Port Murtinho, Brazil of approximately 3.5 hectares and it is located on the shoreline of the Paraguay River. On September 10, 2019 Docas has also acquired a new plot and on June 4, 2020 Docas has acquired from AABB Banco do Brasil an additional plot of land totaling 3.2 hectares for 2019 and 2020. On March 24, 2021, Docas acquired a plot of land of approximately 2.3 hectares. |
• | Compañía Naviera Horamar S.A. leases a piece of land called “La Misteriosa” in an Island in the Province of Entre Rios, Argentina, Department of Islands of Ibicuy and Paranacito. As per an amendment to the lease agreement dated June 30, 2021, the lease expires on June 30, 2023. |
• | Compañía Naviera Horamar S.A. leases approximately 1,370 square meters of an office space at Av. Juana Manso 205, Buenos Aires, Argentina and 25 parking spaces, pursuant to a lease agreement that was renewed on June 13, 2021 for a period of 3 years (until June 2024). |
C. Organizational structure
Navios Holdings maintains its head offices in the Cayman Islands. Navios Logistics maintains offices in Montevideo—Uruguay, Buenos Aires—Argentina, Asunción—Paraguay, and Corumbá—Brazil. Navios Logistics operates the Nueva Palmira dry ports and transfer facilities indirectly through its Uruguayan subsidiaries CNSA and Granos and the San Antonio port facility through its Paraguayan subsidiary, Petrosan.
As of December 31, 2022, all subsidiaries included in the consolidated financial statements are 100% owned, except for Navios Logistics and its subsidiaries, which are 63.8% owned by Navios Holdings. Please see Note 2(b) “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” for a list of our subsidiaries included in the consolidation as of December 31, 2022.
63 |
Affiliate companies included in the financial statements accounted for under the equity method:
In the consolidated financial statements of Navios Holdings, the following entities are included as affiliate companies and are accounted for under the equity method for such periods: (i) Navios Partners and its subsidiaries (ownership interest as of December 31, 2022 was 10.3%); (ii) Navios Acquisition and its subsidiaries (ownership interest through Navios Partners’ NNA Merger, as defined herein, in October 2021 was 6.9%); (iii) Navios Containers and its subsidiaries (ownership interest through Navios Partners’ NMCI Merger, as defined herein, in March 2021 was 3.9%) and (iv) Navios Europe II and its subsidiaries (economic interest through liquidation in June 2020 was 47.5%).
D. Property, plants and equipment
Our only material property is the tanker vessels, barges and pushboats and the port terminal facilities in Paraguay and Uruguay. See “Item 4.B Business Overview” above.
Item 4A. Unresolved Staff Comments
None.
Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects
The following is a discussion of Navios Holdings’ financial condition and results of operations for each of the fiscal years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020. Navios Holdings’ financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. We intend that this section be read together with the consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes as of December 31, 2022 and 2021 and to those financial statements, which are included in this document.
This report contains “forward-looking statements”. These forward-looking statements are based on Navios Holdings’ current expectations and observations. Included among the factors that, in our view, could cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements contained in this report are those discussed under “Risk Factors” and “Forward-Looking Statements”.
Overview
Navios Holdings owns (i) a controlling equity stake in Navios Logistics, one of the largest infrastructure and logistics companies in the Hidrovia region of South America; and (ii) an interest in Navios Partners, a United States publicly listed shipping company that owns and operates dry cargo and tanker vessels.
In September 2022, Navios Holdings completed the sale of its 36-vessel dry bulk fleet consisting of cash and the assumption of bank debt and finance leases related to the vessels, and subject to a working capital adjustment at closing (the “Transaction”), to Navios Partners. The former dry bulk vessel operations were historically a separate reportable segment of the Company. Subsequent to the closing of the Transaction, the results of the dry bulk vessel operations are reported as discontinued operations for all periods presented.
As of March 17, 2023, there were outstanding 22,826,450 shares of common stock and 16,988 shares of preferred stock (5,148 Series G ADSs and 11,840 Series H ADSs).
On September 14, 2022, Navios Holdings commenced a tender offer to purchase up to $20,000 of the outstanding Series G ADSs and Series H ADSs. As of the completion of Navios Holdings’ tender offer on October 21, 2022, a total of 20,185 Series G ADSs were validly tendered in exchange for aggregate cash consideration of $0.3 million, and a total of 584,158 Series H ADSs were validly tendered in exchange for aggregate cash consideration of $8.9 million, resulting in a gain of $4.5 million and undeclared preferred dividends of $8.9 million. After giving effect to the consummation of the tender offer, Navios Holdings has 514,720 outstanding Series G ADSs and 1,183,944 outstanding Series H ADSs, which represent 1/100th of a share of 8.75% Series G Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock and 1/100th of a Share of 8.625% Series H Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock, respectively.
Please see “Item 4. – Information on the Company”
Industry Outlook
Navios Logistics believes the Dry Port Terminal that it owns and operates is the largest independent bulk transfer and storage port terminal complex in Uruguay based on throughputs, and that the Liquid Port Terminal is one of the largest independent storage facilities for crude and petroleum products in Paraguay based on storage capacity. Navios Logistics believes that it is also one of the largest owners and operators of a diverse and versatile fleet of dry and liquid barges, pushboats and oil tankers in the Hidrovia region. Navios Logistics’ port, barge and cabotage operations serve the needs of a diverse range of industries, including mineral and grain commodity providers as well as users of refined petroleum products. Navios Logistics has been able to combine its ports, barges, pushboats and tankers to offer an integrated logistics solution to its customers. Navios Logistics has customers that use both its dry port and dry barge services such as Vetria Mineracao S.A. (“Vetria”), Alicorp and other customers that use or have used its liquid port and liquid barge or cabotage services such as Vitol and Petrosur. Navios Logistics believes that the scale and breadth of its integrated service offerings, together with the strategic location and unique capabilities of its infrastructure assets position it well to capitalize on the continued growth expected in flows within the Hidrovia region. Navios Holdings believes that the continuing development of these businesses will foster throughput growth and therefore increase revenues at Navios Logistics.
64 |
Fleet
Following the completion of the Transaction, the current core fleet of the Company consists of the Navios Logistics fleet.
Navios Logistics’ Fleet
Navios Logistics’ fleet consists of five product tanker vessels, one bunker vessel and one river and estuary product tanker. The table below reflects its cabotage tanker fleet as presented in Navios Logistics’ 20-F filed with SEC.
Vessel |
Type |
Built |
DWT |
Employment Date |
Charter-Out Duration |
Expiration Date | ||||||
Estefania H | Product Tanker | 2008 | 12,000 | December 1, 2021 | 36 months | N/A(1) | ||||||
Makenita H | Product Tanker | 2009 | 17,508 | February 16, 2022 | 48 months | June 27, 2026 | ||||||
Sara H | Product Tanker | 2009 | 9,000 | March 19, 2022 | 2 months | July 1, 2026 | ||||||
Ferni H | Product Tanker | 2010 | 16,871 | April 1, 2020 | 36 months | August 4, 2026 | ||||||
San San H | Product Tanker | 2010 | 16,871 | September 2022 | 9 months | May 31, 2023 | ||||||
May 2023 | 29 months | |||||||||||
Elena H | Product Tanker | 2018 | 4,999 | October 13, 2018 | 60 months | August 18, 2026 | ||||||
He Man H | Bunker Vessel | 2012 | 1,693 | Repositioning | — | September 9, 2024 |
(1) | License does not apply as the vessel has an Argentine flag. |
In Argentina, all of Navios Logistics’ cabotage tanker vessels fly a foreign flag and operate under licenses of one to three years’ duration issued by the Argentinian maritime authorities, other than the Estefania H, which flies the Argentine flag. Such licenses for Navios Logistics’ vessels expire at various times until August 18, 2026. In the event that a license cannot be further renewed, a vessel must fly the Argentine flag to continue operating in Argentine cabotage.
A. Operating Results
Statement of Operations
Navios Holdings reported financial information and evaluated its operations by charter revenues and not by vessel type, length of ship employment, customers or type of charter. Navios Holdings did not use discrete financial information to evaluate the operating results for each such type of charter. Although revenue could be identified for each type of charter, management did not identify expenses, profitability or other financial information on a charter-by-charter or type of charter basis. The reportable segments reflected the internal organization of the Company and were strategic businesses that offer different products and services. Prior to the Transaction, the Company had two reportable segments: the Dry Bulk Vessel Operations and the Logistics Business. The Dry Bulk Vessel Operations segment consisted of the transportation and handling of bulk cargoes through the ownership, operation, and trading of vessels and freight. The Logistics Business segment consisted of port terminal business, barge business and cabotage business in the Hidrovia Region. Subsequent to the closing of the Transaction, the results of the Dry Bulk Vessel Operations are reported as discontinued operations for all periods presented. For further information see Note 3 “Discontinued operations”, included elsewhere in this Annual Report.
Period over Period Comparisons
For the year ended December 31, 2022 compared to the year ended December 31, 2021
The following table presents consolidated revenue and expense information for each of the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. This information was derived from the audited consolidated statement of comprehensive income/(loss) of Navios Holdings for each of the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021. Following the closing of the Transaction (as defined herein), the results of the dry bulk vessel operations have been reported as discontinued operations for all periods presented.
65 |
(In thousands of U.S. dollars) | Year Ended December 31, 2022 |
Year Ended December 31, 2021 | |||||
Revenue | $ | 255,397 | $ | 223,476 | |||
Time charter, voyage and logistics business expenses | (68,726) | (69,040) | |||||
Direct vessel expenses | (76,394) | (64,597) | |||||
General and administrative expenses | (19,772) | (17,042) | |||||
Depreciation and amortization | (31,713) | (31,655) | |||||
Allowance for credit losses | (320) | (391) | |||||
Interest income | 878 | 230 | |||||
Interest expense and finance cost | (64,680) | (65,399) | |||||
Impairment loss/ loss on sale of vessels, net | (3,195) | (21,966) | |||||
Non-operating other finance cost | (24,000) | — | |||||
Other income | 3,790 | 4,100 | |||||
Other expense | (6,610) | (5,531) | |||||
Loss before equity in net (losses)/earnings of affiliate companies | $ | (35,345) | $ | (47,815) | |||
Equity in net (losses)/earnings of affiliate companies | (25,815) | 69,275 | |||||
(Loss)/income before taxes | $ | (61,160) | $ | 21,460 | |||
Income tax benefit/(expense) | 323 | (4,717) | |||||
Net income/(loss) from continuing operations | $ | (60,837) | $ | 16,743 | |||
Net income/(loss) from discontinued operations (including gain from sale of $169,631 in 2022) | 146,106 | 75,158 | |||||
Net income | 85,269 | 91,901 | |||||
Less: Net loss attributable to the noncontrolling interest | 2,037 | 24,785 | |||||
Net income attributable to Navios Holdings common stockholders | $ | 87,306 | $ | 116,686 |
Revenue: Revenue from continuing operations, generated solely from Navios Logistics, was $255.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, as compared to $223.5 million of revenue generated solely from Navios Logistics for the year ended December 31, 2021. The increase was mainly attributable to (i) a $22.5 million increase in revenue from the port terminal business due to higher volumes transshipped at the grain port terminal mainly as a result of increased Uruguayan soybean production and exports, and higher tariffs and volumes transshipped at the iron ore terminal; (ii) a $17.7 million increase in revenue from the cabotage business mainly due to the improvement in the market rates as compared to the year ended December 31, 2021; and (iii) a $0.3 million increase in revenue from the barge business. The overall increase was partially mitigated by a $8.6 million decrease in product sales due to the decrease in the Paraguayan liquid port’s volume of products sold.
Time Charter, Voyage and Logistics Business Expenses: Time charter, voyage and logistics business expenses, from continuing operations decreased by $0.3 million or 0.5% to $68.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, as compared to $69.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2021. The decrease was mainly due to (i) a $8.6 million decrease in cost of products sold mainly attributable to the decrease in the Paraguayan liquid port terminal’s volumes of products sold; and (ii) a $1.2 million decrease in the time charter and voyage expenses of the cabotage business mainly due to fewer spot trips performed during the period, partially mitigated by (i) a $6.2 million increase in time charter and voyage expenses of the barge business mainly due to higher fuel prices and an increase in bunker consumption and other voyage expenses; and (ii) a $3.3 million increase in port terminal expenses, mainly due to higher volumes transshipped in the Grain Port Terminal and the Iron Ore Port Terminal.
Direct Vessel Expenses: Direct vessel expenses, from continuing operations increased by $11.8 million, or 18.3%, to $76.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, as compared to $64.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2021. The increase was mainly attributable to (i) a $10.3 million increase in the cabotage business, mainly due to increased crew payroll and related costs; (ii) a $1.2 million increase in the barge business and (iii) $0.3 million increase in dry-docking and special survey amortization expenses.
General and Administrative Expenses: General and administrative expenses from continuing operations increased by $2.7 million, or 16.0%, to $19.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, as compared to $17.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2021. The increase was mainly attributable to a $3.3 million increase in general and administrative expenses related to Navios Logistics mainly due to an increase in professional fees, payroll and travel expenses, partially mitigated by a $0.6 million decrease in general and administrative expenses related to Navios Holdings for continuing operations. For each of the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, general and administrative expenses, related to Navios Holdings for continuing operations, under the Administrative Services Agreement (as defined herein), amounted to $0.5 million.
66 |
Depreciation and Amortization: Depreciation and amortization, from continuing operations remained stable at $37.1 million for each of the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021.
Allowance for Credit Losses: For the year ended December 31, 2022, allowance for credit losses, from continuing operations decreased by $0.1 million to $0.3 million, as compared to $0.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2021.
Interest Income: Interest income, from continuing operations increased by $0.6 million to $0.9 for the year ended December 31, 2022, as compared to $0.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2021. The increase was mainly attributable to (i) a $0.4 increase in interest income related to Navios Logistics; and (ii) a $0.3 million increase in interest income related to Navios Holdings from continuing operations.
Interest Expense and Finance Cost: Interest expense and finance cost from continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 2022 decreased by $0.7 million, or 1.1%, to $64.7 million, as compared to $65.4 million in the same period of 2021. This decrease was due to a $3.2 million decrease in interest expense and finance cost of the Logistics Business; partially mitigated by a $2.5 million increase in interest expenses and finance cost, net, from Navios Holdings’ continuing operations, mainly due the 4% PIK interest on the Convertible Debenture (as defined herein) entered into with NSM in January 2022.
Impairment Loss/Loss on Sale of Vessels, Net: Impairment loss from continuing operations incurred in the year ended December 31, 2022 was $3.2 million as compared to $22.0 for the same period in 2021. Impairment loss was due to (i) $0.8 million incurred in the Cabotage Business resulting from the sale of the vessel Malva H; and (ii) $2.4 million incurred in the Barge Business in relation to certain barges. During the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company recorded impairment losses of $22.0 million on two of its vessels operating in the Cabotage Business. Please also refer to Note 7 “Vessels, Port Terminal and other fixed assets, net” included elsewhere in this Annual Report.
Other Income: Other income from continuing operations decreased by $0.3 million or 7.6% to $3.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, as compared to $4.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2021 and mainly due to a $0.7 million decrease regarding a claim settlement occurred during the year ended December 31, 2021 in the port terminal business, partially offset by a $0.4 increase in a claim recovery in the barge business during the year ended December 31, 2022.
Other Expense: Other expense from continuing operations increased by $1.1 million or 19.5% to $6.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, as compared to $5.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2021. This increase is mainly due to a $1.1 million increase in taxes other than income taxes.
Equity in Net (Losses)/ Earnings of Affiliate Companies: Equity in net losses of affiliate companies increased by $95.1 million to $25.8 million equity in net losses for the year ended December 31, 2022, as compared to $69.3 million equity in net earnings of affiliate companies for the same period in 2021. This increase was mainly due to a $97.7 million OTTI loss related to our investment in Navios Partners incurred during the year ended December 31, 2022; partially mitigated by a $2.6 million increase in equity method income from subsidiaries (Navios Partners, Navios Acquistion and Navios Containers through their respective mergers with Navios Partners).
Income Tax Benefit/(Expense): Income tax benefit increased by $5.0 million to $0.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, as compared to a $4.7 million income tax expense for the year ended December 31, 2021. The change in income tax was mainly attributable to Navios Logistics due to (i) a $3.7 million increase in tax benefit from the barge business; and (i) a $1.4 million increase in income tax benefit in cabotage business.
Net income from discontinued operations: Net income from discontinued operations, increased by $70.9 million to $146.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, as compared to $75.2 million for the same period in 2021.
67 |
In September 2022, the sale of our 36-vessel drybulk fleet was completed. Following the closing of the Transaction, the results of the dry-bulk vessel operations are reported as discontinued operations for all periods presented.
An analysis of the amounts recorded in respect of discontinued operations in the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively are presented as follows:
Year Ended December 31, 2022 |
Year Ended December 31, 2021 | ||||
Revenue | $ | 204,981 | $ | 362,342 | |
Time charter, voyage and logistics business expenses | (38,515) | (85,412) | |||
Direct vessel expenses | (30,686) | (47,753) | |||
General and administrative expenses | (11,408) | (14,285) | |||
Depreciation and amortization | (18,135) | (29,581) | |||
Interest expense and finance cost, net | (58,791) | (79,584) | |||
Impairment loss/loss on sale of vessels, net | — | (25,861) | |||
(Loss)/gain on bond extinguishment, net | (221) | 951 | |||
Non-operating other finance cost | (61,730) | — | |||
Gain from discontinued operations | 169,631 | — | |||
Other expense, net | (8,967) | (5,561) | |||
Income tax expense | (53) | (98) | |||
Net income from discontinued operations | $ | 146,106 | $ | 75,158 |
Net Loss Attributable to the Noncontrolling Interest: Net loss attributable to the noncontrolling interest decreased by $22.7 million to $2.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, as compared to $24.8 million for the same period in 2021. This decrease was mainly due to decrease in net losses from Logistics Business for the year ended December 31, 2022 as compared to the same period in 2021, which translates into a lower amount allocated to non-controlling interest.
For the year ended December 31, 2021 compared to the year ended December 31, 2020
The following table presents consolidated revenue and expense information for each of the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. This information was derived from the audited consolidated revenue and expense accounts of Navios Holdings for each of the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020. Following the closing of the Transaction (as defined herein), the results of the dry bulk vessel operations have been reported as discontinued operations for all periods presented.
(In thousands of U.S. dollars) | Year Ended December 31, 2021 |
Year Ended December 31, 2020 | |||
Revenue | $ | 223,476 | $ | 215,925 | |
Time charter, voyage and logistics business expenses | (69,040) | (62,997) | |||
Direct vessel expenses | (64,597) | (52,706) | |||
General and administrative expenses | (17,042) | (16,859) | |||
Depreciation and amortization | (31,655) | (28,939) | |||
Allowance for credit losses | (391) | (541) | |||
Interest income | 230 | 209 | |||
Interest expense and finance cost | (65,399) | (49,166) | |||
Impairment loss/ loss on sale of vessels, net | (21,966) | — | |||
Gain on bond and debt extinguishment, net | — | (4,157) | |||
Other income | 4,100 | 5,694 | |||
Other expense | (5,531) | (5,764) | |||
(Loss)/income before equity in net earnings/(losses) of affiliate companies | $ | (47,815) | $ | 699 | |
Equity in net earnings/(losses) of affiliate companies | 69,275 | (1,293) | |||
Income/(loss) before taxes | $ | 21,460 | $ | (594) | |
Income tax expense | (4,717) | (1,865) | |||
Net income/(loss) from continuing operations | $ | 16,743 | $ | (2,459) | |
Net income/(loss) from discontinued operations | 75,158 | (186,146) | |||
Net income/(loss) | $ | 91,901 | $ | (188,605) | |
Less: Net loss/(income) attributable to the noncontrolling interest | 24,785 | (4,356) | |||
Net income/(loss) attributable to Navios Holdings common stockholders | $ | 116,686 | $ | (192,961) |
68 |
Revenue: Revenue from continuing operations, generated solely from the Logistics Business was $223.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2021, as compared to $215.9 million for the same period in 2020. The increase was mainly attributable to (i) a $16.2 million increase in revenue from the barge business mainly due to a $23.8 million increase in CoA/voyage revenues related to higher CoA/voyage revenues of convoys previously under time charter contracts, partially mitigated by a $7.6 million decrease in time charter revenues mainly due to the expiration of certain legacy time charter contracts; and (ii) a $5.4 million increase in revenue from the port terminal business mainly due to higher volumes transshipped in the grain port terminal and higher storage revenues in the iron ore port terminal and liquid port terminal. The overall increase was partially mitigated by (i) a $10.6 million decrease in revenue from the cabotage business mainly due to fewer operating days; and (ii) a $3.5 million decrease in sales of products due to the decrease in the Paraguayan liquid port’s volume of products sold.
Time Charter, Voyage and Logistics Business Expenses: Time charter, voyage and logistics business expenses from continuing operations increased by $6.0 million or 9.6% to $69.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2021, as compared to $63.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2020. The increase of $6.0 million was mainly due to (i) a $7.5 million increase in time charter and voyage expenses of the barge business mainly due to an increase of 46.6% in revenues from spot voyages performed; (ii) a $0.7 million increase in the time charter and voyage expenses of the cabotage business mainly due to higher voyage expenses, mainly fuel; and (iii) a $0.6 million increase in port terminal expenses; partially mitigated by a $2.8 million decrease in cost of products sold mainly due to the decrease in the Paraguayan liquid port terminal’s volumes of products sold.
Direct Vessel Expenses: Direct vessel expenses from continuing operations increased by $11.9 million, or 22.6%, to $64.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2021, as compared to $52.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2020. The increase of $11.9 million was mainly attributable to (i) a $8.6 million increase in the barge business mainly due to the increased utilization of our convoys to service the demand of the COA/voyage market and (ii) a $3.2 million increase in the cabotage business, mainly due to increased crew costs
General and Administrative Expenses: General and administrative expenses from continuing operations increased by $0.2 million, or 1.1%, to $17.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2021 as compared to $16.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2020. The increase was mainly attributable to a $1.2 million increase in general and administrative expenses related to Navios Logistics mainly due to the increases in payroll and related costs, partially mitigated by a $1.0 million decrease in general and administrative expenses related to Navios Holdings for continuing operations. For each of the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, general and administrative expenses, related to Navios Holdings for continuing operations, under the Administrative Services Agreement (as defined herein), amounted to $0.5 million.
Depreciation and Amortization: Depreciation and amortization, from continuing operations increased by $2.7 million, or 9.4%, to $31.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2021, as compared to $28.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2020. The increase of $2.7 million was mainly due to (i) a $2.3 million increase in the barge business mainly due to the delivery of each of the six liquid barges completed in the first quarter of 2021 and the Navios Logistics’ 2020 Fleet acquired in the first quarter of 2021 and (ii) a $0.4 million increase in the port terminal business mainly due to increased depreciation expense of tangible assets. Depreciation and amortization in the cabotage business amounted to $3.5 million for year ended December 31, 2021, unchanged compared to the same period in 2021.
Allowance for Credit Losses: For the year ended December 31, 2021, allowance for credit losses, from continuing operations decreased by $0.2 million to $0.4 million, as compared to $0.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2020.
Interest Income: Interest income, from continuing operations remained stable at $0.2 million for each of the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020.
Interest Expense and Finance Cost: Interest expense and finance cost from continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 2021 increased by $16.2 million, or 33.0%, to $65.4 million, as compared to $49.2 million in the same period of 2020. This increase was mainly due to a $16.2 million increase in interest expense and finance cost of the Logistics Business mainly due to the higher weighted average interest rate of Navios Logistics due to the issuance of the 2025 Logistics Senior Notes (as defined herein). For each of the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, interest expense and finance cost, related to Navios Holdings for continuing operations, remained stable at $0.8 million.
Impairment Loss/Loss on Sale of Vessels, Net: Impairment loss from continuing operations incurred in the year ended December 31, 2021 was $22.0 million as compared to nil for the same period in 2020. During the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company recorded impairment losses of $22.0 million on two of its vessels operating in the Cabotage Business.
(Loss)/gain on Bond and Debt Extinguishment, net: Loss on bond and debt extinguishment, net from continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 2021 decreased by $4.2 million, to nil million, as compared to $4.2 million in the same period of 2020. The decrease of $4.2 million was due to the accelerated amortization of Navios Logistics’ unamortized deferred financing costs due to the repayment in full of the 2022 Logistics Senior Notes and the Navios Logistics’ Term Loan B Facility. Please refer also to Note 11 “Borrowings”, included elsewhere in this Annual Report.
69 |
Other Income: Other income from continuing operations decreased by $1.6 million to $4.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2021, as compared to $5.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2020. The decrease of $1.6 million was mainly due to a $4.3 million decrease related to a claim settlement regarding a storage and transshipment contract in the grain port terminal during the year ended December 31, 2020; partially mitigated by (i) a $2.1 million increase in gain from foreign exchange differences; and (ii) a $0.7 million increase due a claim settlement during the year ended December 31, 2021.
Other Expense: Other expense from continuing operations decreased by $0.2 million to $5.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2021, as compared to $5.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2020. This decrease is mainly a $0.2 million decrease in taxes other than income taxes.
Equity in Net Earnings/(Losses) of Affiliate Companies Equity in net earnings of affiliate companies increased by $70.6 million to $69.3 million equity in net earnings for the year ended December 31, 2021, as compared to $1.3 million equity in net losses of affiliate companies for the same period in 2020. This increase was mainly due to (i) a $61.3 million increase in equity method income from Navios Partners, from which the amount of $25.9 million is related to the NMCI Merger; (ii) a $13.4 million other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”) loss relating to the investment in Navios Acquisition recognized in the fourth quarter of 2020; (iii) $6.7 million other-than-temporary impairment OTTI loss relating to the investment in Navios Europe II recognized in the first quarter of 2020; and (iv) a $0.5 million increase in equity method income from Navios Containers. The overall increase was partially mitigated by a $11.2 million decrease in equity method income from Navios Acquisition, mainly due to the NNA Merger.
Income Tax Expense: Income tax expense increased by $2.9 million to $4.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2021, as compared to a $1.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2020. The change in income tax was mainly attributable to Navios Logistics due to (i) a $3.6 million increase in tax expense from the barge business; partially mitigated by (i) a $0.8 million decrease in income tax expense in cabotage business. The overall increase was mainly due to the recalculation of the deferred tax liability resulting from an increase in income tax rate.
Net income/(loss) from discontinued operations: Net income/(loss) from discontinued operations, increased by $261.3 million to $75.2 million income for the year ended December 31, 2021, as compared to $186.1 million loss for the same period in 2020.
An analysis of the amounts recorded in respect of discontinued operations in the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively are presented as follows:
Year Ended December 31, 2021 |
Year Ended December 31, 2020 | ||||
Revenue | $ | 362,342 | $ | 200,793 | |
Time charter, voyage and logistics business expenses | (85,412) | (103,592) | |||
Direct vessel expenses | (47,753) | (52,049) | |||
General and administrative expenses | (14,285) | (16,843) | |||
Depreciation and amortization | (29,581) | (42,076) | |||
Interest expense and finance cost, net | (79,584) | (87,345) | |||
Impairment loss/loss on sale of vessels, net | (25,861) | (88,367) | |||
(Loss)/gain on bond extinguishment, net | 951 | 11,204 | |||
Impairment loss for Navios Europe II | — | (6,050) | |||
Other expense, net | (5,561) | (1,634) | |||
Income tax expense | (98) | (187) | |||
Net income/(loss) from discontinued operations | $ | 75,158 | $ | (186,146) |
Net Loss/(Income) Attributable to the Noncontrolling Interest: Net loss attributable to the noncontrolling interest increased by $29.1 million to $24.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2021, as compared to $4.4 million net income attributable to the noncontrolling interest for the same period in 2020. This increase was mainly attributable to Logistics Business net loss recognized for the year ended December 31, 2021 compared to net income recognized in the same period in 2020.
70 |
B. Liquidity and Capital Resources
On July 26, 2022, Navios Holdings agreed to sell its 36-vessel dry bulk fleet to Navios Partners consisting of cash and the assumption of bank debt and finance leases related to the vessels, and subject to working capital adjustment at closing. On September 8, 2022, the Company completed the sale of its drybulk vessels to Navios Partners. For further information see Note 3 “Discontinued operations” in the consolidated financial statements, included elsewhere in the Annual Report.
Navios Holdings has historically financed its capital requirements with cash flows from operations, issuances of debt securities and borrowings under bank credit facilities. Main uses of funds have been refinancings of outstanding debt, capital expenditures for the acquisition of new assets, new construction and upgrades at the port terminals and expenditures incurred in connection with ensuring that the owned vessels comply with international and regulatory standards. Navios Holdings may from time to time, subject to restrictions under its debt and equity instruments, including limitations on dividends and repurchases under its preferred stock, depending upon market conditions and financing needs, use available funds to refinance or repurchase its debt in privately negotiated or open market transactions, by tender offer or otherwise, in compliance with applicable laws, rules and regulations, at prices and on terms Navios Holdings deems appropriate (which may be below par) and subject to Navios Holdings cash requirements for other purposes, compliance with the covenants under Navios Holdings’ debt agreements, and other factors management deems relevant. In addition, we regularly review options for refinancing our outstanding indebtedness and opportunities for acquisition of businesses and additional vessels, development of new facilities and infrastructure, joint ventures and other corporate transactions that may be material to us. Generally, our sources of funds may be from cash flows from operations, long-term borrowings and other debt or equity financings, proceeds from asset sales and proceeds from sale of our stake in our investments. We cannot provide any assurance that we will be able to secure adequate financing or obtain additional funds on favorable terms, to meet our liquidity needs.
See “Item 5B. - Working Capital Position” for further discussion of Navios Holdings’ working capital position.
Cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2022 compared to the year ended December 31, 2021:
The following table presents cash flow information for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021. This information was derived from the audited Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows of Navios Holdings for the respective periods.
(in thousands of U.S. dollars) | Year Ended December 31, 2022 |
Year Ended December 31, 2021 |
Year Ended December 31, 2020 | |||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | $ | 130,709 | $ | 109,620 | $ | 25,211 | ||
Net cash provided by investing activities | 332,115 | 118,774 | 592 | |||||
Net cash (used in)/provided by financing activities | (521,824) | (201,727) | 6,654 | |||||
(Decrease)/increase in cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash | (59,000) | 26,667 | 32,457 | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash, beginning of year | 137,851 | 111,184 | 78,727 | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash, end of year | $ | 78,851 | $ | 137,851 | $ | 111,184 |
Cash provided by operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2022 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2021:
Net cash provided by operating activities increased by $21.1 million to $130.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, as compared to $109.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2021.
The net cash inflows resulting from the change in operating assets and liabilities of $28.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2022 resulted from: (i) $34.3 million increase in amounts due to affiliates companies; (ii) $33.1 million in Convertible Debenture movement; and (iii) $7.3 million decrease in prepaid expenses and other current assets. This amount was partially mitigated by: (i) $21.7 million decrease in accrued expenses and other liabilities; (ii) $11.5 million payments for drydock and special survey costs; (iii) $5.6 million decrease in operating lease liabilities, net; (iv) $2.6 million decrease in deferred income and cash received in advance; (v) $2.2 million decrease in accounts payable; (vi) $2.1 million increase in inventories; and (vii) 0.7 million increase in accounts receivable.
The net cash outflow resulting from the change in operating assets and liabilities of $48.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2021 resulted from: (ii) $21.3 million payments for dry dock and special survey costs; (ii)$17.3 million decrease in operating lease liabilities, net; (iii) $11.0 million decrease in accrued expenses and other liabilities; (iv) $9.9 million increase in accounts receivable; (v) $0.5 million decrease in due to affiliate companies; and (vi) $0.2 million decrease in deferred income and cash received in advance. This amount was partially mitigated by: (i) $7.1 million increase in accounts payable; (ii) $2.2 million decrease in prepaid expenses and other assets; (iii) $1.8 million decrease in inventories; and (iv) $0.3 million increase in other long-term liabilities.
71 |
Cash provided by investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2022 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2021:
Net cash provided by investing activities increased by $213.3 million to $332.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2021, as compared to $118.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2021.
Cash provided by investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2022 was the result of (i) $370.6 million in proceeds from the sale of the 36-vessel dry bulk fleet; and (ii) $2.2 million of proceeds related to the sale of the Malva H, partially mitigated by (i) $21.4 million in payments made by Navios Holdings for the acquisition of Navios Sky and additions to vessels; (ii) $9.9 million of cash disposed of as a result of the sale of the 36-vessel dry bulk fleet; (iii) $6.9 million in payments for the purchase of tangible assets; (iv) $1.9 million in payments for the construction of a new stockpile in the Iron Ore Port Terminal; (v) $0.6 million in payments for the construction of a new crane in the Iron Ore Port Terminal; and (vi) $0.1 million in payments for the development of our port operations in Port Murtinho, Brazil.
Cash provided by investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2021 was the result of: (i) $167.0 million proceeds from sale of Navios Astra, Navios Centaurus, Navios Avior, Navios Serenity, Navios Ray, Navios Bonavis, Navios Koyo which was a previously chartered-in vessel and Navios Azimuth; (ii) $0.3 million in collections of Navios Logistics’ Note receivable; and (iii) $0.2 million dividends received from Navios Acquisition; partially mitigated by (i) $25.0 million in payments made by Navios Holdings for acquisition of/additions to vessels; (ii) $17.0 million in payments for the acquisition of Navios Logistics’ three pushboats and 18 liquid barges, (iii) $3.1 million for the construction of a crane, (iv) $2.1 million in payments for the purchase of fixed assets, (v) $1.2 million in payments for the construction of Navios Logistics’ six new liquid barges and (vi) $0.4 million in payments for the construction of Navios Logistics’ two new tanks; and (vii) $0.1 million in payments for the development of Navios Logistics’ port operations in Port Murtinho region of Brazil.
Cash used in financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2022 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2021:
Net Cash used in financing activities increase by $320.1 million to $521.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, as compared to $201.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2021.
Cash used in financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2022 was the result of (i) $610.5 million in payments made for the repayment of the 2022 Notes (as defined herein) and the 2022 Senior Secured Notes (as defined herein); (ii) $375.3 million in repayments of loans payable to affiliate companies; (iii) $42.5 million in payments made in connection with Navios Holdings outstanding indebtedness; (iv) $36.0 million in payments made in connection with Navios Logistics’ outstanding indebtedness; (v) $10.0 in payments relating to the redemption of preferred stock; (vi) $5.0 million in payments made in connection with the promissory note (as defined herein); (vii) $1.6 million in payments of deferred financing costs; and (viii) $0.2 million in payments made in connection with the finance lease liability. These increases were partially mitigated by the receipt of: (i) $262.6 million in proceeds from loans payable to affiliate companies; (ii) $206.7 million in proceeds from long term debt from Navios Holdings; and (iii) $53.0 million in proceeds from three sale and leaseback agreements; (iv) $37.0 million in proceeds from Navios Logistics’ long term debt.
Cash used in financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2021 was the result of (i) $168.6 million in payments for the repayment of the 2022 Notes and 2022 Senior secured Notes; (ii) $130.7 million in payments made related to the loans from affiliate companies; (iii) $76.2 million in payments made in connection with Navios Holdings’ indebtedness; (iv) $21.0 million in payments made in connection with the acquisition of the noncontrolling interest, including $5.0 million relating to promissory note; (v) $13.5 million in payments made in connection with Navios Logistics’ outstanding indebtedness; (vi) $5.3 million in payments for the repayment of Navios Logistics’ Notes Payable (as defined herein); (vii) $3.9 million in payments of deferred financing costs; partially mitigated by (i) $115.0 million proceeds from loan payable to affiliate companies; (ii) $58.0 million proceeds from three Sale and Leaseback Agreements; and (iii) $44.4 million in proceeds from the sale of shares, net of expenses.
72 |
Cash provided by operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2021 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2020:
Net cash provided by operating activities increased by $84.4 million to $109.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2021, as compared to $25.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2020.
The net cash outflow resulting from the change in operating assets and liabilities of $48.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2021 resulted from: (ii) $21.3 million payments for dry dock and special survey costs; (ii)$17.3 million decrease in operating lease liabilities, net; (iii) $11.0 million decrease in accrued expenses and other liabilities; (iv) $9.9 million increase in accounts receivable; (v) $0.5 million decrease in due to affiliate companies; and (vi) $0.2 million decrease in deferred income and cash received in advance. This amount was partially mitigated by: (i) $7.1 million increase in accounts payable; (ii) $2.2 million decrease in prepaid expenses and other assets; (iii) $1.8 million decrease in inventories; and (iv) $0.3 million increase in in other long-term liabilities.
The net cash inflows resulting from the change in operating assets and liabilities of $30.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2020 resulted from: (ii) $37.5 million increase in due to affiliate companies; (ii) $18.5 million increase in accrued expenses and other liabilities; (iii) $7.8 million increase in accounts payable; and (iv) $0.6 million increase in deferred income and cash received in advance. This amount was partially mitigated by: (i) $17.4 million payments for dry dock and special survey costs; (ii) $5.5 million increase in prepaid expenses and other assets; (iii) $4.0 million decrease in operating lease liabilities, net; (iv) $3.6 million increase in inventories; (v) $3.0 million increase in accounts receivable; and (vi) $0.2 million decrease in other long-term liabilities.
Cash provided by investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2021 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2020:
Net cash provided by investing activities increased by $118.2 million to $118.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2021, as compared to $0.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2020.
Cash provided by investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2021 was the result of: (i) $167.0 million proceeds from sale of Navios Astra, Navios Centaurus, Navios Avior, Navios Serenity, Navios Ray, Navios Bonavis, Navios Koyo which was a previously chartered-in vessel and Navios Azimuth; (ii) $0.3 million in collections of Navios Logistics’ Note receivable; and (iii) $0.2 million dividends received from Navios Acquisition; partially mitigated by (i) $25.0 million in payments made by Navios Holdings for acquisition of/additions to vessels; (ii) $17.0 million in payments for the acquisition of Navios Logistics’ three pushboats and 18 liquid barges, (iii) $3.1 million for the construction of a crane, (iv) $2.1 million in payments for the purchase of fixed assets, (v) $1.2 million in payments for the construction of Navios Logistics’ six new liquid barges and (vi) $0.4 million in payments for the construction of Navios Logistics’ two new tanks; and (vii) $0.1 million in payments for the development of Navios Logistics’ port operations in Port Murtinho region of Brazil.
Cash provided by investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2020 was the result of: (i) $83.4 million proceeds from sale of Navios Hios, Navios Kypros, Navios Star, Navios Amitie, Navios Northern Star, Navios Gem and Navios Victory; (ii) $18.6 million settlement of receivables in connection with Navios Europe II liquidation; (iii) $5.8 million dividends received from Navios Acquisition; (iv) $0.2 million in collections of Navios Logistics’ Note receivable; (v) $97.0 million in payments made by the Company for the acquisition of Navios Canary, Navios Corali, Jupiter N and Rainbow N and for additions to vessels; (vi) $5.2 million in payments for the acquisition of three Navios Logistics’ pushboats and 18 liquid barges, for the construction of Navios Logistics’ six new liquid barges, two new tanks in Navios Logistics’ liquid port terminal and a crane; (vii) $3.3 million in payments for the purchase of Navios Logistics’ other fixed assets; (viii) $2.1 million in payments as deposits for options to acquire vessels under bareboat contracts.
Cash used in financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2021 as compared to cash provided by financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2020:
Cash used in financing activities was $201.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2021, as compared to $6.7 million cash provided by financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2020.
Cash used in financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2021 was the result of (i) $168.6 million in payments for the repayment of the 2022 Notes and 2022 Senior secured Notes; (ii) $130.7 million in payments made related to the loans from affiliate companies; (iii) $76.2 million in payments made in connection with Navios Holdings’ indebtedness; (iv) $21.0 million in payments made in connection with the acquisition of the noncontrolling interest, including $5.0 million relating to promissory note; (v) $13.5 million in payments made in connection with Navios Logistics’ outstanding indebtedness; (vi) $5.3 million in payments for the repayment of Navios Logistics’ Notes Payable (as defined below); (vii) $3.9 million in payments of deferred financing costs; partially mitigated by (i) $115.0 million proceeds from loan payable to affiliate companies; (ii) $58.0 million proceeds from three Sale and Leaseback Agreements; and (iii) $44.4 million in proceeds from the sale of shares, net of expenses.
73 |
Cash provided by financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2020 was the result of (i) $487.5 million net proceeds from the 2025 Logistics Senior Notes (net of deferred financing costs of $12.5 million); (ii) $66.9 million proceeds from the Sale and Leaseback Agreements (net of deferred financing costs of $1.1 million), (iii) $50.0 million proceeds from loan payable to affiliate companies; (iv) $13.6 million proceeds from Navios Logistics’ long term debt; (v) $375.0 million payments for the redemption of the 2022 Logistics Senior Notes (as defined below); (vi) $97.5 million prepayments of the Navios Logistics’ Term Loan B Facility; (vii) $50.0 million prepayments of loan payable to affiliate companies; (viii) $38.6 million prepayments of Navios Holdings’ indebtedness; (ix) $28.6 million scheduled repayments; (x) $12.3 million dividend paid to common shareholders; and (xi) $9.4 million payments for the repurchase of the 2022 Notes.
Adjusted EBITDA: EBITDA represents net income/(loss) attributable to Navios Holdings’ common stockholders before interest and finance costs, depreciation and amortization and income taxes. Adjusted EBITDA represents EBITDA before stock based compensation. Adjusted EBITDA is presented because it is used by certain investors to measure a company’s operating performance and is reconciled to net income/(loss), the most comparable U.S. GAAP performance measure. Adjusted EBITDA is calculated as follows: net income/(loss) adding back, when applicable and as the case may be, the effect of (i) depreciation and amortization; (ii) amortization of deferred drydock and special survey costs; (iii) stock based compensation; (iv) interest expense and finance cost, net; and (v) income tax benefit/(expense). Navios Holdings believes that Adjusted EBITDA is a basis upon which performance can be assessed and represents useful information to investors regarding their ability to incur indebtedness and meet working capital requirements. Navios Holdings also believes that Adjusted EBITDA is used (i) by prospective and current lessors as well as potential lenders to evaluate potential transactions; (ii) to evaluate and price potential acquisition candidates; and (iii) by securities analysts, investors and other interested parties in the evaluation of companies in our industry.
Adjusted EBITDA has limitations as an analytical tool, and therefore, should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for the analysis of Navios Holdings’ results as reported under U.S. GAAP. Some of these limitations are: (i) Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect changes in, or cash requirements for, working capital needs; (ii) Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect the amounts necessary to service interest or principal payments on our debt and other financing arrangements; and (iii) although depreciation and amortization are non-cash charges, the assets being depreciated and amortized may have to be replaced in the future. Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect any cash requirements for such capital expenditures. Because of these limitations, among others, Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered as a principal indicator of Navios Holdings’ performance. Furthermore, our calculation of Adjusted EBITDA may not be comparable to that reported by other companies due to differences in methods of calculation.
74 |
Adjusted EBITDA Reconciliation to (Loss)/income
Year Ended December 31, 2022 | Year Ended December 31, 2022 | Year Ended December 31, 2021 | Year Ended December 31, 2020 | |||||
(in thousands of U.S. dollars) | (unaudited) | (unaudited) | (unaudited) | |||||
Net (loss)/income from continuing operations | $ | (58,800) | $ | 41,528 | $ | (6,816) | ||
Depreciation and amortization | 31,713 | 31,655 | 28,939 | |||||
Amortization of deferred drydock and special survey costs | 4,356 | 4,122 | 3,958 | |||||
Stock based compensation | 171 | 589 | 1,269 | |||||
Interest expense and finance cost, net | 87,802 | 65,169 | 48,957 | |||||
Income tax (benefit)/expense | (323) | 4,717 | 1,865 | |||||
Adjusted EBITDA | $ | 64,919 | $ | 147,780 | $ | 78,172 |
Adjusted EBITDA for the year ended December 31, 2022 decreased by $82.9 million to $64.9 million, as compared to $147.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2021. The decrease in Adjusted EBITDA was primarily due to (i) a $95.1 million decrease in equity in net losses from affiliate companies mainly due to a $97.7 million OTTI loss related to our investment in Navios Partners incurred during the year ended December 31, 2022, mitigated by a $2.6 million increase in equity method income from subsidiaries; (ii) a $22.7 million decrease in net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest; (iii) a $11.6 million increase in direct vessel expenses (excluding the amortization of deferred drydock, special survey costs and other capitalized items); (iv) a $3.1 million increase in general and administrative expenses (excluding stock-based compensation expenses); and (v) a $1.3 million increase in other expense. This overall decrease of $133.9 million was partially mitigated by (i) a $31.9 million increase in revenue from Navios Logistics; (ii) a $18.8 million decrease in impairment loss/ loss on sale of vessels, net; and (iii) a $0.3 million decrease in time charter, voyage and logistics business expenses.
Adjusted EBITDA for the year ended December 31, 2021 decreased by $69.6 million to $147.8 million, as compared to $78.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2020. The increase in Adjusted EBITDA was primarily due to (i) a $70.6 million increase in equity in net earnings from affiliate companies; (ii) a $29.1 million decrease in net income attributable to the noncontrolling interest; (iii) a $7.6 million increase in revenue from Navios Logistics; and (iv) a $4.2 million decrease in loss on bond and debt extinguishment, net. This overall increase of $111.4 million was partially mitigated (i) a $22.2 million increase in impairment loss/ loss on sale of vessels, net; (ii) a $11.7 million increase in direct vessel expenses (excluding the amortization of deferred drydock, special survey costs and other capitalized items); (iii) a $6.0 increase in in time charter, voyage and logistics business expenses; (iv) a $1.2 million increase in other expense; and (v) a $0.9 million decrease in general and administrative expenses (excluding stock-based compensation expenses).
Long-Term Debt Obligations and Credit Arrangements:
Navios Holdings' long-term debt obligations and credit arrangements are presented under the captions “Current portion of long-term debt, net”, “Current portion of senior and ship mortgage notes, net”, “Senior and ship mortgage notes, net of current portion”, “Long-term debt, net of current portion” and “Convertible debenture payable to affiliate companies”, under current and non-current liabilities in the consolidated statement of financial position, included elsewhere in this Annual Report. As of December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, total borrowings, net amounted to $651.2 million and $686.8 million, respectively. The current portion of long-term borrowings, net amounted to $23.5 million at December 31, 2022 and $130.7 million at December 31, 2021. Please see Note 7 “Borrowings” to our consolidated financial statements, included elsewhere in this Annual Report for a full description of Interest-bearing loans and borrowings.
Working Capital Position:
As of December 31, 2022, Navios Holdings’ current assets totaled $147.6 million, while current liabilities excluding operating lease liabilities totaled $107.0 million, resulting in a positive working capital position of $40.6 million.
Based on internal forecasts and projections that take into account potential changes in the Company’s trading performance and other assets, management believes that the Company has adequate financial resources to continue in operation and meet its financial commitments, including but not limited to capital expenditures and debt service obligations, for a period of at least twelve months from the date of issuance of the interim condensed consolidated financial statements. Although internal forecasts and projections are driven by market data and are subject to future volatility along with other factors outside the control of the Company, with the existence of alternative liquidity sources and management’s ability to utilize them if needed, management concludes that the Company has the ability to continue as a going concern as of the date of the issuance of the interim condensed consolidated financial statements.
75 |
Capital Expenditures:
Since 2018, Navios Logistics has acquired a total of approximately 9.0 hectares of undeveloped land located in Port Murtinho, Brazil, for a total cost of $1.6 million. Navios Logistics plans to develop this land for its port operations.
As of December 31, 2022, Navios Logistics has paid $0.8 million and $0.7 million, respectively, for capitalized expenses for the development of its port operations in the port Murtinho region of Brazil, which is included under the caption Other-long term assets” in our consolidated statement of financial position included elsewhere in this Annual Report.
As of December 31, 2022, Navios Logistics has paid $2.5 million for expansion works in its Iron Ore Port Terminal, which is included under the caption “Other-long term assets” in our consolidated statement of financial position included elsewhere in this Annual Report.
During the first quarter of 2021, Navios Logistics completed the construction of six liquid barges and transferred a total of $19.5 million to “Vessels, port terminals and other fixed assets, net” in the consolidated statement of financial position of which capitalized interest amounted to $1.1 million.
During the first quarter of 2021, Navios Logistics completed the construction of two new tanks in its liquid port terminal and transferred a total of $1.8 million to “Vessels, port terminals and other fixed assets, net” in the consolidated statement of financial position.
In the fourth quarter of 2020, Navios Logistics entered into a purchase agreement with an unrelated third party for the acquisition of the Navios Logistics 2020 Fleet, for a purchase price of $30.0 million. The acquisition was completed on March 22, 2021. As of December 31, 2021, a total amount of $32.0 million was transferred to the caption “Vessels, port terminals and other fixed assets, net”.
During the second quarter of 2021, Navios Logistics completed the installation of a crane in its grain port terminal and a total of $3.8 million was transferred to “Vessels, port terminals and other fixed assets, net” in the consolidated statement of financial position.
Dividend Policy
In November 2015, Navios Holdings announced that the Board of Directors decided to suspend the quarterly dividend to its common stockholders in order to conserve cash and improve its liquidity. In February 2016, in furtherance of its efforts to reduce its cash requirements, Navios Holdings announced the suspension of payment of quarterly dividends on its preferred stock, including the Series G and Series H, until market conditions improve. The Board of Directors and Navios Holdings’ management believe such a decision is in the best long-term interests of the Company and its stakeholders. The Board of Directors will reassess the Company’s distribution policy as the environment changes. The reinstatement, declaration and payment of any further dividend remains subject to the discretion of the Board of Directors and will depend on, among other things, market conditions, Navios Holdings’ cash requirements after taking into account market opportunities, restrictions under its equity instruments, credit agreements, indentures and other debt obligations and such other factors as the Board of Directors may deem advisable.
Dividends from Navios Logistics—Acquisition of noncontrolling interest
On July 30, 2021, Navios Logistics declared and paid a pro rata dividend to the holders of its common equity in shares of Grimaud Ventures S.A. (“Grimaud”). All transactions were eliminated on consolidated level as of that date. Immediately thereafter, Grimaud agreed to redeem the equity interests held by its non-controlling shareholder in full at fair market value. Please see also Note 17 “Preferred and common stock” included elsewhere in this Annual Report.
76 |
Concentration of Credit Risk:
Accounts receivable
Concentration of credit risk with respect to accounts receivables is limited due to Navios Holdings’ large number of customers, who are internationally dispersed and have a variety of end markets in which they sell. Due to these factors, management believes that no additional credit risk beyond amounts provided for collection losses is inherent in Navios Holdings’ trade receivables. For the year ended December 31, 2022, two customers accounted for 20.9% and 13.4%, respectively, of the Company’s revenue. For the year ended December 31, 2021, two customers accounted for 23.3% and 10.3%, respectively, of the Company’s revenue. For the year ended December 31, 2020, one customer accounted for 31.7% of the Company’s revenue from continuing operations.
Cash deposits with financial institutions
Cash deposits in excess of amounts covered by government-provided insurance are exposed to loss in the event of non-performance by financial institutions. Navios Holdings does maintain cash deposits in excess of government-provided insurance limits. Navios Holdings also reduces exposure to credit risk by dealing with a diversified group of major financial institutions.
Effects of Inflation:
Navios Holdings does not consider inflation to be a significant risk to the cost of doing business in the foreseeable future. The Company considered various factors in assessing the impact of Argentina’s highly inflationary economy on Navios Logistics, including sales, financing arrangements, working capital, employee salaries, and taxes. The functional currency of the Company’s Argentinian subsidiary is the U.S. dollar and the day-to-day operations of the Company’s Argentinian subsidiary are dependent on the economic environment of the Company’s U.S. dollar currency. As a result, the Company concluded that the highly inflationary economic environment in Argentina would not have a material impact on Navios Logistics’ financial statements and as such, determined not to issue a restatement.
C. Research and development, patents and licenses, etc.
Not applicable.
D. Trend Information
Our results of operations depend primarily on the charter hire rates that we are able to realize for our affiliates’ vessels, which depend on the demand and supply dynamics characterizing the dry bulk market at any given time. For other trends affecting our business, please see other discussions in Item 5. “Operating and Financial Review and Prospects”.
E. Critical Accounting Estimates
Critical Accounting Policies
Navios Holdings’ consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The preparation of these financial statements requires Navios Holdings to make estimates in the application of its accounting policies based on the best assumptions, judgments and opinions of management. Following is a discussion of the accounting policies that involve a higher degree of judgment and the methods of their application that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities, revenues and expenses and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of its financial statements. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
Critical accounting policies are those that reflect significant judgments or uncertainties, and potentially result in materially different results under different assumptions and conditions. Navios Holdings has described below what it believes are its most critical accounting policies that involve a high degree of judgment and the methods of their application. For a description of all of Navios Holdings’ significant accounting policies, see Note 2 “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” to the consolidated financial statements, included herein.
All references to the Dry Bulk Vessels included in the following accounting policies relate to the periods prior to the completion of the Transaction.
Use of Estimates: The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the dates of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. On an ongoing basis, management evaluates the estimates and judgments. Estimates and judgements management evaluates relate to, among other things, uncompleted voyages, future drydock dates, the assessment of other-than-temporary impairment related to the carrying value of investments in affiliate companies, the selection of useful lives for tangible and intangible assets, expected future cash flows from long-lived assets and operating lease assets to support impairment tests, impairment test for goodwill, allowance for credit losses necessary for accounts receivables and demurrages, provisions for legal disputes, pension benefits, contingencies and guarantees. Management bases its estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various other factors that they believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources.
77 |
Impairment of Long Lived Assets: Vessels, other fixed assets and other long-lived assets held and used by the Company are reviewed periodically for potential impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of a particular asset may not be fully recoverable. Navios Holdings’ management evaluates the carrying amounts and periods over which long-lived assets are depreciated to determine if events or changes in circumstances have occurred that would require modification to their carrying values or useful lives. Measurement of the impairment loss is determined as the difference between the carrying value and the fair value.
Navios Holdings
Navios Holdings determined the fair value of its assets on the basis of management estimates and assumptions by making use of available market data and taking into consideration third party valuations performed on an individual vessel basis. In evaluating useful lives and carrying values of long-lived assets, certain indicators of potential impairment were reviewed, such as undiscounted projected operating cash flows, vessel sales and purchases, business plans and overall market conditions.
Undiscounted projected net operating cash flows were determined for each asset group and compared to the carrying value of the vessel, the unamortized portion of deferred drydock and special survey costs, the unamortized portion of ballast water treatment system and the unamortized portion of other capitalized items, if any related to the vessel or the carrying value of deposits for newbuildings. The loss recognized either on impairment (or on disposition) would reflect the excess of carrying value over fair value (selling price) for the vessel asset group.
Where the undiscounted projected net operating cash flows for each asset group did not exceed the carrying value of the operating lease asset and the carrying value of deposits for the option to acquire a vessel including expenses and interest, management proceeded to perform step two of the impairment assessment. In step two of the impairment assessment, the Company determined the fair value of its vessels through a combination of a discounted cash flow analysis utilizing market participant assumptions from available market data and third-party valuations performed on an individual vessel basis.
Pursuant to the Transaction during the third quarter of 2022, the Company completed the sale of its 21 owned vessels to Navios Partners. For further information see Note 3 “Discontinued operations” in the consolidated financial statements, included elsewhere in this Annual Report. No impairment losses were recognized on any of Navios Holdings vessels during the year ended December 31, 2022.
As of December 31, 2021, the Company considered various indicators, including but not limited to the market price of its long-lived assets, its contracted revenues and cash flows and the economic outlook, and concluded for the Dry Bulk Vessel Operations that no events and circumstances occurred, which could trigger the existence of potential impairment of the Company’s vessels. As a result, no step one of impairment assessment was performed as of December 31, 2021.
During the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2020, management concluded that events occurred, and circumstances had changed, which indicated that potential impairment of the Company’s long-lived assets could exist. These indicators included continued volatility in the spot market, and the related impact of the current dry bulk sector on management’s expectation for future revenues. As a result, an impairment assessment of long-lived assets (step one) was performed.
The Company determined undiscounted projected net operating cash flows for each vessel and compared it to the vessel’s carrying value together with the carrying value of deferred drydock and special survey costs, ballast water treatment system costs and other capitalized items, if any, related to the vessel. The significant factors and assumptions used in the undiscounted projected net operating cash flow analysis included: determining the projected net operating cash flows by considering the charter revenues from existing time charters for the fixed fleet days (the Company’s remaining charter agreement rates) and an estimated daily time charter equivalent for the unfixed days (based on a combination of one-year average historical time charter rates and 10-year average historical one-year time charter rates) over the remaining economic life of each vessel, net of brokerage and address commissions excluding days of scheduled off-hires, management fees for vessel operating expenses fixed until 2021 and thereafter assuming an annual increase of 3.0% every second year and a utilization rate of 99.3% based on the fleet’s historical performance.
As of December 31, 2020, our assessment concluded that step two of the impairment analysis was required for two of our dry-bulk vessels held and used, as the undiscounted projected net operating cash flows did not exceed the carrying value for such vessels. As a result, the Company recorded an impairment loss of $52.8 million for the two dry-bulk vessels, representing the difference between the fair value and the vessels’ carrying value together with the carrying value of deferred drydock and special survey costs, ballast water treatment system costs and other capitalized items, if any, related to these vessels. The impairment is presented under the caption “Net income/(loss) from discontinued operations” in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income/(loss).
78 |
Navios Logistics
Vessels, other fixed assets and other long-lived assets held and used by Navios Logistics are reviewed periodically for potential impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of a particular asset may not be fully recoverable. In accordance with accounting for long-lived assets, management determines projected undiscounted cash flows for each asset group and compares it to its carrying amount. In the event that projected undiscounted cash flows for an asset group is less than its carrying amount, then management reviews fair values and compares them to the asset group’s carrying amount. In the event that impairment occurs, an impairment charge is recognized by comparing the asset group’s carrying amount to its fair value. For the purposes of assessing impairment, long lived-assets are grouped at the lowest levels for which there are separately identifiable cash flows.
During the fourth quarter of 2022, Navios Logistics completed the sale of vessel Malva H for a sale price of $2.2 million. The impairment loss of $0.8 million (including $0.7 million remaining carrying balance of dry dock costs), being the difference of vessel’s carrying value and fair value, recorded in the third quarter of 2022, is included in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income/(loss) under the caption “Impairment loss/ loss on sale of vessels, net”. The fair value was determined based on the agreed sale’s price. No impairment triggering events were identified and consequently no impairment loss was recorded on any of the remaining tanker vessels of Navios Logistics during the year ended December 31, 2022. Further, in the third quarter of 2022, Navios Logistics recorded an impairment loss of $2.4 million for certain barges, representing the difference between the fair value and the carrying value together with the carrying value of deferred drydock and special survey costs, if any, related to these barges, which is included in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income under the caption “Impairment loss/ loss on sale of vessels, net”. The fair value was determined based on the agreed or expected sale’s price. No impairment loss was recorded on any of the remaining vessels, other fixed assets and other long-lived assets held and used by Navios Logistics for the year ended December 31, 2022.
As of December 31, 2021, management concluded thatcertain events and circumstances had changed, indicating a potential impairment of two of the Logistics Business’s tanker vessels. These events and circumstances included the extended period in which its tanker vessels operating in the cabotage business have been without a long-term time charter contract. The extended delay is the result of the status of the current tanker market and the vessels’ capacity. Vessels’ capacity appears to be limited to trading in the markets of Argentina and Uruguay.
Navios Logistics recorded an impairment loss of $22.0 million for two of its tanker vessels operating in its cabotage business, representing the difference between the carrying value of the vessels including the carrying value of deferred drydock and special survey costs related to these vessels, and their respective fair values. Navios Logistics determined the fair value of its assets on the basis of evaluations provided by third-party independent shipbrokers and compared them to the carrying value of the vessels including the unamortized portion of deferred drydock and special survey costs. The impairment loss recognized reflected the excess of carrying value over fair value for the vessel asset group. The impairment loss is included under the caption “Impairment loss/ loss on sale of vessels, net” in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income/(loss). See Note 7 “Vessels, Port Terminals and Other Fixed Assets, Net” in the consolidated financial statements, included elsewhere in this Annual Report.
No impairment loss was recorded on any of the remaining vessels, other fixed assets and other long-lived assets held and used by Navios Logistics for the year ended December 31, 2021.
No impairment loss was recorded on any of the vessels, other fixed assets and other long-lived assets held and used by Navios Logistics for the year ended December 31, 2020.
79 |
Dry Bulk Vessels, Port Terminals, Tanker Vessels, Barges, Pushboats and Other Fixed Assets, net: Dry bulk vessels, port terminals, tanker vessels, barges, pushboats and other fixed assets acquired as parts of business combinations are recorded at fair value on the date of acquisition, and if acquired as an asset acquisition, are recorded at cost (including transaction costs). Vessels constructed by the company would be stated at historical cost, which consists of the contract price, capitalized interest and any material expenses incurred upon acquisition (improvements and delivery expenses). Subsequent expenditures for ballast water treatment system, major improvements and upgrades are capitalized, provided they appreciably extend the life, increase the earnings capability or improve the efficiency or safety of the vessels. The cost and related accumulated depreciation of assets retired or sold are removed from the accounts at the time of sale or retirement and any gain or loss is included in the accompanying consolidated statements of comprehensive income/(loss).
Expenditures for routine maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred.
Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the useful life of the vessels, port terminals, tanker vessels, barges, pushboats and other fixed assets, after considering the estimated residual value.
Annual depreciation rates used, which approximate the useful life of the assets are:
Dry bulk vessels | 25 years |
Port terminals | 5 to 49 years |
Tanker vessels, barges and pushboats | 15 to 45 years |
Furniture, fixtures and equipment | 3 to 10 years |
Computer equipment and software | 5 years |
Leasehold improvements | shorter of lease term or 6 years |
Management estimated the residual values of the Company’s dry bulk vessels based on a scrap value cost of steel times the weight of the ship noted in lightweight tons (“LWT”). Residual values were periodically reviewed and revised to recognize changes in conditions, new regulations or for other reasons. Revisions of residual values affect the depreciable amount of the vessels and the depreciation expense in the period of the revision and future periods. Management estimated the residual values of the Company’s vessels based on a scrap rate of $340 per LWT after considering current market trends for scrap rates and ten-year average historical scrap rates of the residual values of the Company’s vessels.
Management estimated the useful life of its dry bulk vessels to be 25 years from the vessel’s original construction. However, when regulations place limitations on the ability of a vessel to trade, its useful life was re-estimated to end at the date such regulations become effective. An increase in the useful life of a vessel or in its residual value would have had the effect of decreasing the annual depreciation charge and extending it into later periods. A decrease in the useful life of a vessel or in its residual value would have had the effect of increasing the annual depreciation charge.
Deferred Drydock and Special Survey Costs: The Company’s vessels, barges and pushboats are subject to regularly scheduled drydocking and special surveys which are carried out every 30 and 60 months, respectively, for ocean-going vessels, and up to every 72 to 96 months for pushboats and barges, to coincide with the renewal of the related certificates issued by the classification societies, unless a further extension is obtained (in rare cases) and under certain other conditions. The costs of drydocking and special surveys are deferred and amortized over the above periods or to the next drydocking or special survey date if such date has been determined. Unamortized drydocking or special survey costs of vessels, barges and pushboats sold are written off to income in the year the vessel, barge or pushboat is sold.
Costs capitalized as part of the drydocking or special survey consist principally of the actual costs incurred at the yard, and expenses relating to spare parts, paints, lubricants and services incurred solely during the drydocking or special survey period. For each of the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, the amortization of deferred drydock and special survey costs from continuing operations was $4.4 million, $4.1 million and $4.0 million, respectively.
80 |
Goodwill and Other Intangibles:
(i) Goodwill: Goodwill is tested for impairment at the reporting unit level at least annually and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value of goodwill may not be recoverable.
Navios Holdings evaluated impairment of goodwill using a single step process following the adoption of ASU 2017-04, “Intangibles-Goodwill and Other (Topic 350)” as of January 1, 2020. The aggregate fair value of the reporting unit is compared to its carrying amount, including goodwill. Navios Holdings determined the fair value of the reporting unit based on a combination of the income approach (i.e. discounted cash flows) and market approach (i.e. comparative market multiples) and believes that the combination of these two approaches is the best indicator of fair value for its individual reporting units. Goodwill impairment loss was measured as the amount by which a reporting unit’s carrying amount exceeds its fair value, not to exceed the carrying amount of goodwill.
As of December 31, 2022, goodwill of $56.2 million was allocated to the Dry Bulk Vessel Operations, and included in the carrying value of the disposal group, Please refer to Note 3 “Discontinued Operations”, included elsewhere in this Annual Report.
As of December 31, 2021, the Company performed its impairments test for its reporting units within the Dry Bulk Vessel Operations and the Logistics Business. The Company additionally considered that its market capitalization continued to remain at a level well below the carrying amount.
As of December 31, 2021, the Company performed the impairment test for the Dry Bulk Vessel Operations reporting unit, which, was allocated goodwill of $56.2 million and is included in the consolidated statement of financial position under the caption “Non-current assets from discontinued operations”. The impairment test revealed that the fair value of the Dry Bulk Vessel Operations reporting unit exceeded its carrying amount.
The fair value of the Dry Bulk Vessel Operations reporting unit was estimated using a combination of income and market approaches. For the income approach, the expected present value of future cash flows used judgments and assumptions that management believes were appropriate in the circumstances. The significant factors and assumptions the Company used in its discounted cash flow analysis included: EBITDA, the discount rate used to calculate the present value of future cash flows and future capital expenditures. EBITDA assumptions included revenue assumptions, general and administrative expense growth assumptions and direct vessel expense growth assumptions. The future cash flows were determined by considering the charter revenues from existing time charters for the fixed fleet days (the Company’s remaining charter agreement rates) and an estimated daily time charter equivalent for the unfixed days (based on a combination of one-year average historical time charter rates and the 10-year average of historical one-year time-charter rates). The Company believes this approach to be objective for forecasting charter rates over an extended time period for long-lived assets and consistent with the cyclicality of the industry. In addition, a weighted average cost of capital (“WACC”) was used to discount future estimated cash flows to their present values. The WACC was based on externally observable data considering market participants’ and the Company’s cost of equity and debt, optimal capital structure and risk factors specific to the Company. The market approach estimated the fair value of the Company’s business based on comparable publicly-traded companies in its industry. In assessing the fair value, the Company utilized the results of the valuations and considered the range of fair values determined under all methods which indicated that the fair value exceeded the carrying amount.
As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the Company performed the impairment test for the Logistics Business, which is allocated goodwill of $104.1 million. Management compares the aggregate fair value of the reporting unit to its carrying amount, including goodwill. Goodwill impairment loss is measured as the amount by which a reporting unit’s carrying amount exceeds its fair value. Management determines the fair value of its logistics reporting unit using the income approach (i.e. discounted cash flow method). Management forecasts all the expected net cash flows associated with the reporting unit, which includes the application of a terminal value for the period after forecast and applies a discount rate to arrive at the fair value. Expected net cash flows include EBITDA and direct and general and administrative expense assumptions. EBITDA assumptions include revenue assumptions, and expenses growth assumptions. The significant factors and assumptions used in the discounted cash flow analysis include the estimated time charter, voyage and port revenue for the unfixed days, the terminal value, terminal growth rate and the discount rate (i.e. ‘‘WACC’’) used to calculate the present value of future cash flows . The estimated time charter, voyage and port revenue for the unfixed days were determined by considering revenues from existing contracts and estimated revenues for the unfixed days, based on historical performance, including utilization rates and storage capacity. Terminal growth rate was determined by taking into consideration industry and market conditions. The WACC was based on externally observable data considering market participants’ and the Company’s cost of equity and debt, optimal capital structure and risk factors specific to the Company.
No impairment loss was recorded for any of the periods presented for both the Dry Bulk Vessel Operations and the Logistics Business.
(ii) Intangibles Other Than Goodwill: Consolidated intangible assets, consist of Navios Holding’s trade name of $44.0 million that was allocated to the Dry Bulk Vessel Operations, and included in the carrying value of the disposal group and Navios Logistics customer relationships and port terminal operating rights. The fair value of Navios Holdings trade name was determined based on the “relief from royalty” method which values the trade name based on the estimated amount that a company would have to pay in an arm’s length transaction to use that trade name. The trade name was amortized under the straight-line method over 32 years.
81 |
The Company reviews its other intangibles such as trade name, customer relationships and port terminal operating rights periodically for potential impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be fully recoverable. Intangibles other than goodwill would be considered impaired if their carrying value is not recovered from the future undiscounted cash flows associated with the asset (step one). Measurement of the impairment loss is determined as the difference between the carrying amount and the fair value of the intangible asset. The Company determines the fair value of its intangible assets based on management estimates and assumptions by making use of available market data. In evaluating carrying values of intangible assets, certain indicators of potential impairment are reviewed, such as undiscounted projected operating cash flows, business plans and overall market conditions.
As of December 31, 2022, the Company concluded that no events and circumstances occurred that could trigger the existence of potential impairment of the Navios Logistics’ other intangible assets, including port terminal operating rights and customer relationships. As a result, step one of impairment assessment was not required as of December 31, 2022.
As of December 31, 2021, the Company concluded that no events and circumstances occurred that could trigger the existence of potential impairment of the Navios Holdings trade name, and the Navios Logistics’ other intangible assets, including port terminal operating rights and customer relationships. As a result, step one of impairment assessment was not required as of December 31, 2021.
During the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2020, management concluded that certain events occurred and circumstances had changed indicating a potential impairment of the Navios Holdings trade name. These changes in events and circumstances included continued volatility in the spot market, and the impact of the current dry bulk sector on management’s expectation for future revenues. As a result, an impairment assessment for trade name (step one) was performed.
The significant factors and assumptions the Company used in the undiscounted cash flow analysis of its trade name included: revenue assumptions, specifically the future cash flows were determined by considering the charter revenues of the Dry Bulk Vessel Operations from existing time charters for the fixed fleet days (the Company’s remaining charter agreement rates) and an estimated daily time charter equivalent for the unfixed days (based on a combination of one-year average historical time charter rates and the 10-year average historical one-year time charter rates) and the respective “relief from royalty” rate applied to the future cash flows of the Dry Bulk Vessel Operations.
No impairment loss was recorded for the Company’s intangible assets as of December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020.
The weighted average amortization periods for intangibles are:
Intangible assets | Years | |
Trade name | 32 | |
Port terminal operating rights | 47 | |
Customer relationships | 20 |
Leases: Leases where the Company acts as the lessor are classified as either operating or sales-type / direct financing leases. In cases of lease agreements where the Company acts as the lessor under an operating lease, the Company keeps the underlying asset on the consolidated balance sheets and continues to depreciate the assets over its useful life. In cases of lease agreements where the Company acts as the lessor under a sales-type / direct financing lease, the Company derecognizes the underlying asset and records a gross investment in the lease.
The difference between the gross investment in the lease and the sum of the present values of the two components of the gross investment is recorded as unearned income which is amortized to income over the lease term as finance lease interest income to produce a constant periodic rate of return on the net investment in the lease.
For charters classified as operating leases where Navios Holdings is deemed the lessor, refer to Note 2(r) “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies -Revenue and Expense Recognition” to the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report. The Company acts as a lessor under operating leases in connection with all of its charter out arrangements.
In cases of lease agreements where the Company acts as lessee, the Company recognizes an operating lease asset and a corresponding lease liability on the consolidated balance sheet. For charters classified as operating leases where Navios Holdings is or is deemed the lessee, the expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the rental periods of such charter agreements. The expense is included under the caption “Time charter, voyage and logistics business expenses”.
82 |
In cases of sale and leaseback agreements, if the transfer of the asset to the lessor does not qualify as a sale, then the agreement constitutes a failed sale and leaseback and is accounted for as a financial liability. For a sale to have occurred, the control of the asset would need to be transferred to the lessor, and the lessor would need to obtain substantially all the benefits from the use of the asset.
Impairment of operating lease assets: Operating lease assets used by Navios Holdings were reviewed periodically for potential impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be fully recoverable. Measurement of the impairment loss was determined as the difference between the carrying value and the fair value of the asset group. Navios Holdings determined the fair value of its assets based on management estimates and assumptions by making use of available market data. In evaluating carrying values of operating lease assets, certain indicators of potential impairment were reviewed, such as undiscounted projected operating cash flows, business plans and overall market conditions.
Undiscounted projected net operating cash flows were determined for each asset group and compared to the carrying value of the operating lease asset and the carrying value of deposits for the option to acquire a vessel including expenses and interest (asset group). If the step two of the impairment analysis was required, the analysis included the use of discounted cash flows which includes various assumptions, including the Company’s WACC.
If management determined that step two of the impairment analysis was required for any of our asset groups, a discounted cash flow analysis using the Company’s WACC was performed. The WACC was based on externally observable data considering market participants’ and the Company’s cost of equity and debt, optimal capital structure and risk factors specific to the Company. Where the undiscounted projected net operating cash flows for each asset group did not exceed the carrying value of the operating lease asset and the carrying value of deposits for the option to acquire a vessel including expenses and interest, management proceeded to perform step two of the impairment assessment.
Pursuant to the Transaction during the third quarter of 2022, the Company completed the sale of its 15 charter-in and bareboat-in vessels to Navios Partners. For further information see Note 3 “Discontinued operations” in the consolidated financial statements, included elsewhere in this Annual Report.
As of December 31, 2021, the Company concluded that no events or circumstances occurred that would trigger the existence of potential impairment of its operating lease assets. As a result, no step-one impairment assessment was performed as of December 31, 2021.
During the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2020, management concluded that events occurred, and certain circumstances had changed, such that potential impairment of the Company’s operating lease assets could exist. These events and circumstances included continued volatility in the spot market, the impact of such volatility on the current dry bulk sector, and the resulting effect on management’s expectation for future revenues. As a result, an impairment assessment of operating lease assets (step one) was performed. The Company determined undiscounted projected net operating cash flows for each charter-in and bareboat-in vessel and compared those cash flows to each operating lease asset’s carrying value together with the carrying value of deposits for the option to acquire a vessel including expenses and interest.
Factors and assumptions used in the undiscounted projected net operating cash flow analysis included a determination of the projected net operating cash flows by considering the charter revenues from existing time charters for the fixed-fleet days (the Company’s remaining charter agreement rates), an estimated daily time charter equivalent for the unfixed days (based on three-year average historical time charter rates) over the remaining lease term, net of brokerage and address commissions excluding days of scheduled off-hires (for the bareboat-in vessels), and management fees for vessel operating expenses in accordance with the terms of the Management Agreement. The determination process assumed an annual increase of 3.0% every second year for the bareboat-in vessels.
As of December 31, 2020, our assessment concluded that step two of the impairment analysis was required for two asset groups, which involved a discounted cash flow analysis using the Company’s WACC. As a result, the Company recorded an impairment loss of $1.4 million, representing the difference between the fair value of the operating lease asset and its carrying value. The impairment loss is presented under the caption “Net income/(loss) from discontinued operations” in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income/(loss).
Investment in Equity Securities: Navios Holdings evaluates its investment in Navios Partners, and evaluated its investment in Navios Containers and Navios Acquisition (through their NMCI Merger and NNA Merger in March 2021 and September 2021, respectively), and Navios Europe II (through its liquidation in June 2020) for OTTI on a quarterly basis. Consideration is given to (i) the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than the carrying value, (ii) the financial condition and near-term prospects of Navios Partners, and (iii) the intent and ability of the Company to retain its investment in Navios Partners for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value. If the Company considers any decline to be “other-than-temporary”, then the Company would write down the carrying amount of the investment to its estimated fair value.
83 |
Navios Holdings considers whether the fair values of its equity method investments have declined below their carrying values whenever adverse events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. If we consider any such decline to be “other-than-temporary” (based on various factors, including historical financial results, economic and industry events resulting in changes in the affiliate’s trading performance and the overall health of the affiliate’s industry), then we would write down the carrying amount of the investment to its estimated fair value.
As of December 31, 2022, the Company recognized an OTTI loss of $97.7 million relating to its investment in Navios Partners and the amount was included under the caption “Equity in net (losses)/earnings of affiliate companies”
As of December 31, 2021, the Company did not recognize any “other-than-temporary” loss in its investment in Navios Partners since we concluded that the decline in fair value of its investment in Navios Partners below its carrying value is temporary.
As of December 31, 2020, the Company did not recognize any “other-than-temporary” loss in its investments in both Navios Partners and Navios Containers. As of December 31, 2020, the Company recognized an OTTI loss of $13.4 million relating to its investment in Navios Acquisition and the amount was included under the caption “Equity in net (losses)/earnings of affiliate companies”. During the first quarter of 2020, the Company considered the decline in fair value of its investment in Navios Europe II as OTTI and therefore recognized a loss of $6.7 million in the accompanying consolidated statement of comprehensive income/(loss) included under the caption “Equity in net earnings/(losses) of affiliate companies”.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
For a description of Navios Holdings’ recent accounting pronouncements, see Note 2 “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” to the consolidated financial statements, included herein.
G. Safe Harbor
Applicable to the extent the disclosures in Item 5.E and 5.F above are eligible for the statutory safe harbor protections provided to forward-looking statements.
Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees
A. Directors and Senior Management
The current board of directors, executive officers and significant employees are as follows:
Name | Age | Position | ||
Angeliki Frangou | 58 | Chairwoman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer | ||
Georgios Akhniotis | 58 | Chief Financial Officer | ||
Ted C. Petrone* | 68 | Vice Chairman of Navios Corporation | ||
Vasiliki Papaefthymiou | 54 | Executive Vice President—Legal and Director | ||
Anna Kalathakis | 53 | Chief Legal Risk Officer | ||
Shunji Sasada* | 65 | President of Navios Corporation and Director | ||
Efstratios Desypris | 50 | Chief Financial Controller | ||
Ioannis Karyotis | 47 | Senior Vice President—Strategic Planning | ||
Erifili Tsironi | 49 | Senior Vice President – Credit Management | ||
Spyridon Magoulas | 69 | Director | ||
John Stratakis | 58 | Director | ||
Efstathios Loizos | 61 | Director | ||
George Malanga | 65 | Director | ||
Michael Pearson | 46 | Director |
* | Significant employee |
84 |
Angeliki Frangou has been our Chairwoman and CEO since August 25, 2005. In addition, Ms. Frangou has been the Chairwoman and Chief Executive Officer of Navios Maritime Partners L.P. (NYSE: NMM), an affiliated limited partnership, since August 2007.Ms. Frangou has been the Chairwoman of the Board of Directors of Navios South American Logistics Inc. since its inception in December 2007. Ms. Frangou is also a Member of the Foundation for Economic and Industrial Research. Since 2015, she has also been on the Board of Trustees of Fairleigh Dickinson University. Ms. Frangou also acts as Vice Chairwoman of the China Classification Society Mediterranean Committee, and is a member of the International General Committee and of the Hellenic and Black Sea Committee of Bureau Veritas, and is also a member of the Greek Committee of Nippon Kaiji Kyokai. Ms. Frangou received a bachelor’s degree in Mechanical Engineering, summa cum laude, from Fairleigh Dickinson University and a master’s degree in Mechanical Engineering from Columbia University.
Georgios Akhniotis has been Navios Holdings’ Chief Financial Officer since April 12, 2007. Prior to being appointed Chief Financial Officer of Navios Holdings, Mr. Akhniotis served as Senior Vice President-Business Development of Navios Holdings from August 2006 to April 2007. Mr. Akhniotis has also been Navios South American Logistics Inc. Chief Executive Officer since October 2022 and Director since 2008. Mr. Akhniotis is currently a Director and Executive Vice President-Business Development of Navios Maritime Partners L.P. (NYSE: NMM), an affiliated limited partnership,. Before joining Navios Holdings, Mr. Achniotis was a partner at PricewaterhouseCoopers (“PwC”) in Greece, heading the Piraeus office and the firm’s shipping practice. He became a partner at PwC in 1999 when he set up and headed the firm’s internal audit services department from which all SOX implementation and consultation projects were performed. He has more than 20 years’ experience in the accounting profession with work experience in England, Cyprus and Greece. Mr. Akhniotis holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Civil Engineering from the University of Manchester and he is a member of the institute of chartered accountants in England and Wales. Mr. Akhniotis is also a member of the institute of certified accountants in Cyprus.
Ted C. Petrone became Vice Chairman of Navios Corporation in January 2015 having previously served as a director of Navios Maritime Holdings Inc. (“Navios Holdings”) from May 2007 to January 2015 and President of Navios Corporation from September 2006 to January 2015. Mr. Petrone has also been Navios South American Logistics Inc. President since July 2020. Mr. Petrone also serves as Vice Chairman of Navios Maritime Partners L.P. since November 2022. Mr. Petrone has served in the maritime industry for 45 years, 42 of which he has spent with Navios Holdings. After joining Navios Holdings as an assistant vessel operator, Mr. Petrone worked in various operational and commercial positions. Mr. Petrone was previously responsible for all aspects of the daily commercial activity, encompassing the trading of tonnage, derivative hedge positions and cargoes. Mr. Petrone graduated from New York Maritime College at Fort Schuyler with a Bachelor of Science degree in maritime transportation. He has served aboard U.S. Navy (Military Sealift Command) tankers.
Vasiliki Papaefthymiou has been Executive Vice President — Legal and a member of Navios Holdings’ board of directors since its inception, and prior to that was a member of the board of directors of ISE. Ms. Papaefthymiou has served as general counsel for Maritime Enterprises Management S.A. since October 2001, where she has advised the Company on shipping, corporate and finance legal matters. Ms. Papaefthymiou provided similar services as general counsel to Franser Shipping from October 1991 to September 2001. Ms. Papaefthymiou received her undergraduate degree from the Law School of the University of Athens and a Master’s Degree in Maritime Law from Southampton University in the United Kingdom. Ms. Papaefthymiou is admitted to practice law before the Bar in Piraeus, Greece.
Anna Kalathakis has been Chief Legal Risk Officer since November 2012, and Senior Vice President — Legal Risk Management of Navios Maritime Holdings Inc. (“Navios Holdings”) from December 2005 until October 2012. Ms. Kalathakis has also been Navios South American Logistics Inc. Secretary since inception and Executive Vice President – Group Risk Management and Director since October 2022. Before joining Navios Holdings, Ms. Kalathakis was the General Manager of the Greek office of A. Bilbrough & Co. Ltd. and an Associate Director of the Company (Managers of the London Steam-Ship Owners’ Mutual Insurance Association Limited). She has previously worked for a U.S. maritime law firm in New Orleans, was admitted to practice law in the state of Louisiana in 1995, and has also worked in a similar capacity at a London maritime law firm. She qualified as a solicitor in England and Wales in 1999 and was admitted to practice law before the Bar in Piraeus, Greece in 2003. She has studied International Relations at Georgetown University, Washington D.C. (1991). She holds an MBA from European University at Brussels (1992) and a J.D. from Tulane Law School (1995).
Shunji Sasada became a director of Navios Maritime Holdings Inc. (“Navios Holdings”) and President of Navios Corporation in January 2015. Mr. Sasada has also served as President since November 2022 and as a Director in Navios Maritime Partners L.P. since August 2007. Previously, as Chief Operating Officer of Navios Corporation and Senior Vice President of Fleet Development, he headed Navios Holdings’ program for the growth and development of the Company’s long-term chartered-in and owned tonnage. Mr. Sasada started his shipping career in 1981 in Japan with Mitsui’s O.S.K. Lines, Ltd. (“MOSK”). Mr. Sasada’s first position with MOSK was in steel products in the Tokyo branch as a salesman for exporting steel products to worldwide destinations. Two years later, Mr. Sasada moved to the tramp section in MOSKitsui’s bulk carrier division and was in charge of operations and then of chartering 20-40 smaller Handysize vessels between 21,000 dwt and 35,000 dwt. In 1991, Mr. Sasada moved to Norway to join Trinity Bulk Carriers as its chartering manager as well as subsidiary board member, representing MOSK as one of the shareholders. After an assignment in Norway, Mr. Sasada moved to London and started MOSK’s own Ultra Handymax operation as its General Manager. Mr. Sasada joined Navios Holdings in May 1997. Mr. Sasada is the member of the North American Committee of Nippon Kaiji Kyokai (Class NK). He is a graduate of Keio University, Tokyo, with a B.A. degree in Business and he is a member of the Board of Trustees of Keio Academy of New York.
85 |
Efstratios Desypris has been our Chief Financial Controller since February 2011. Mr. Desypris has previously served as Financial Controller since May 2006. Mr. Desypris is also the Chief Operating Officer of Navios Maritime Partners since November 2021 and the Chief Financial Officer of N Shipmanagement Acquisition since September 2019. In addition, Mr. Desypris served as Chief Financial Officer of Navios Maritime Partner L.P. from 2010 to November 2021. He also serves as Senior Vice President — Strategic Planning and Director of Navios Logistics. Before joining Navios Group, Mr. Desypris worked for 9 years in the accounting profession, most recently as manager of the audit department at Ernst & Young in Greece. Mr. Desypris started his career as an auditor with Arthur Andersen & Co. in 1997. He holds a Bachelor of Science Degree in Economics from the University of Piraeus.
Ioannis Karyotis has been our Senior Vice President — Strategic Planning since February 2011. Mr. Karyotis has also been Chief Operating Officer of Navios Logistics since October 2022. Previously,mr. Karyotis has served as Chief Financial Officer of Navios Logistics since March 2011. Prior to joining the Company, from 2006 until 2011, Mr. Karyotis was Consultant and later Project Leader at The Boston Consulting Group (BCG), an international management consulting firm. From 2003 until 2005, Mr. Karyotis was Senior Equity Analyst at Eurocorp Securities, a Greek brokerage house, and in 2003, he was Senior Analyst in the Corporate Finance Department at HSBC Pantelakis Securities, a subsidiary of HSBC Bank. Mr. Karyotis began his career in 2002 with Marfin Hellenic Securities as Equity Analyst. He received his Bachelor’s Degree in Economics from the Athens University of Economics and Business (1998). He holds a Master’s of science in Finance and Economics from the London School of Economics (1999) and an MBA from INSEAD (2006).
Erifyli Tsironi has been our Senior Vice President – Credit Management since October 2014. Furthermore Ms. Tsironi is the Chief Financial Officer of Navios Maritime Partners L.P. since November 2021. Prior to that, Ms. Tsironi served as Chief Financial Officer of Navios Maritime Containers L.P. since 2019 until completion of the merger with Navios Maritime Partners L.P. and as Chief Financial Officer of Navios Maritime Midstream Partners L.P since its inception in 2014 until completion of the merger with Navios Maritime Acquisition Corporation in 2018. Ms. Tsironi has 26 years’ experience in shipping. Before joining us, she was Global Dry Bulk Sector Coordinator and Senior Vice President at DVB Bank SE focusing on ship finance. Ms. Tsironi joined the Bank in 2000 serving as Assistant Local Manager and Senior Relationship Manager. Previously, she served as account manager/shipping department in ANZ Investment Bank/ANZ Grindlays Bank Ltd from May 1997 until December 1999. Ms. Tsironi holds a BSc. in Economics, awarded with Honours, from the London School of Economics and Political Science and a MSc in Shipping, Trade and Finance, awarded with Distinction, from Bayes (ex Cass) Business School of City University in London.
Spyridon Magoulas has been a member of Navios Holdings’ Board of Directors since its inception, and prior to that was a member of the board of directors of ISE. Mr. Magoulas was the co-founder of Doric Shipbrokers S.A., a chartering firm based in Athens, Greece, and has served as the managing director of Doric Shipbrokers S.A. from its formation in 1994 until his retirement in 2022. From 1982 to 1993, Mr. Magoulas was chartering director and shipbroker for Nicholas G. Moundreas Shipping S.A., a company located in Piraeus, Greece. Mr. Magoulas received a Bachelor’s Degree in Economics (honors) from the City University of New York, New York, a Master’s Degree in Transportation Management from the Maritime College in New York and a Master’s Degree in Political Economy from the New School for Social Research in New York. In addition to his role on the Board of Directors, Mr. Magoulas also serves as a member of the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Nominating and Governance Committee. Mr. Magoulas is an independent director.
John Stratakis has been a member of Navios Holdings’ Board of Directors since its inception, and prior to that was a member of the board of directors of ISE. Since 1994, Mr. Stratakis has been a partner with the law firm of Poles, Tublin, Stratakis & Gonzalez, LLP, in New York, New York, where he specializes in all aspects of marine finance law and general corporate law. He serves on the Advisory Board of the Center for Corporate Governance at Drexel University LeBow College of Business. Mr. Stratakis also has been a director and the President of the Hellenic-American Chamber of Commerce in New York. He serves on the board of New York Maritime Inc., an association that promotes the New York region as a maritime business center. Mr. Stratakis received a Bachelor of Arts (cum laude) from Trinity College and a Juris Doctor Degree from Washington College of Law at American University. Mr. Stratakis is admitted to practice law in the State of New York and in the courts of the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York. In addition to his role on the Board of Directors, Mr. Stratakis also serves as chairman of the Nominating and Governance Committee and a member of the Compensation Committee. Mr. Stratakis is an independent director.
86 |
Efstathios Loizos was appointed to our Board of Directors in July 2010. Mr. Loizos was also director of Navios Partners from October 2007 until June 2010. In October 2008, Mr. Loizos joined the Managing Team of ION S.A., a leading Greek chocolate and cocoa group of companies, with the responsibility of supervising MABEL S.A., one of the affiliate companies of the group. In June 2010, Mr. Loizos was appointed to the Board of Directors of ION S.A. and assumed enlarged executive responsibilities within the group. Since March 2014, Mr. Loizos serves as the CEO of the affiliate company INTERION S.A., which operates in Bulgaria and since 2018 as the Vice President of the ION group of companies. In May 2010, Mr. Loizos was elected as a member of the Board of Directors of IOBE (Foundation of Economic and Industrial Research). Between 2001 and 2008, Mr. Loizos served as the General Manager and a member of the Board of Directors of ELSA S.A., a Greek steel packaging company, and also as the Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors of its affiliate company ATLAS S.A. From 2005 to 2007, Mr. Loizos served as the President of the International Packaging Association and as the Vice President of the Greek Association of Steel Packaging Manufacturers. Mr. Loizos received a Maitrise en Sciences Economiques from the University of Strasbourg and an M.B.A. in Finance from Stern Business School—New York University. Mr. Loizos also serves as Chairman of the Audit Committee and chairman of the Compensation Committee. Mr. Loizos is an independent director.
George Malanga has been a member of our Board of Directors since April 2010. He is currently serving as the Chief Credit Officer of BNY Mellon.Mr. Malanga has held a variety of positions during his 35 year tenure with the bank. He began his banking career in various relationship management roles before moving to risk management in 2000. Mr. Malanga has served in roles with increased responsibility in credit risk management over the past 21 years. His credit risk experience includes head of asset recovery, head of domestic corporate credit and currently as Chief Credit Officer of BNY Mellon. Mr. Malanga holds a Bachelor’s Degree in Business Administration from Rutgers College and an M.B.A. in Finance from New York University. Mr. Malanga also serves as a member of the Audit Committee and the Nominating and Governance Committee. Mr. Malanga is an independent director.
Michael Pearson has been a director of the Company since April 2021, and is based in the Cayman Islands. He is a qualified accountant (UK) and worked at EY, PwC and Deloitte. In 2012, he founded FFP, a fiduciary services firm based in the Cayman Islands and British Virgin Islands. Mr. Pearson is also a qualified insolvency practitioner (UK) and has been appointed by Caribbean Courts in a protective or investigative capacity. He graduated from the University of Bath in 1999 with an Honours Degree in Business Administration. Mr. Pearson is an independent director.
There are no family relationships between any of our directors, executive officers or significant employees.
B. Compensation of Directors
The aggregate annual compensation (including bonus) paid to our current executive officers was approximately $3.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2022.
On December 18, 2019, December 21, 2020, December 15, 2021 and December 21, 2022 the Company authorized the granting of restricted share units and share appreciation rights and the issuance of shares of restricted common stock, restricted stock units and stock options under Navios Holdings 2015 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended in December 2018 (the “2015 Equity Incentive Plan”) for its employees, officers and directors. These awards of restricted share units, share appreciation rights, restricted common stock units, restricted common stock and stock options to its employees, officers and directors, vest over three and four years.
Details of options granted
As of the filing of this Annual Report on Form 20-F, 770,558 stock options to purchase the Company’s common stock and 250,000 share appreciation rights have been granted of which 250,000 have vested, 711,852 have expired, 0 remain unvested and 58,706 have been exercised in total, of which 41,141 were granted at an exercise price of $31.80 per share, 3,058 at an exercise price of $58.70 per share, 6,315 at an exercise price of $51.50 per share, 5,953 at an exercise price of $38.10 per share, and 2,239 at an exercise price of $34.40 per share.
Out of the 770,558 stock options granted and 250,000 share appreciation rights granted, 28,800 options were granted at an exercise price of $167.50 per share; 57,124 options were granted at an exercise price of $31.80 per share; 40,531 options were granted at an exercise price of $58.70 per share; 95,479 options were granted at an exercise price of $51.50 per share; 134,429 options were granted at an exercise price of $38.10 per share; 134,427 options were granted at an exercise price of $34.40 per share; 67,475 options were granted at an exercise price of $86.30 per share; 112,293 options were granted at an exercise price of $36.4 per share; and 100,000 options were granted at an exercise price of $12.00 per share. A total of 250,000 share appreciation rights were granted at an exercise price of $12.00 per share.
Details of restricted stock and restricted stock units issued (post Reverse Stock Split)
As of the filing of this Annual Report on Form 20-F, 1,752,203 restricted share units, shares of restricted stock and restricted stock units have been granted and 254,000 share appreciation rights have been granted, of which 1,871,982 have vested and in the aggregate 52,192 were forfeited during the years from 2007 until 2022. See Note 13 “Employee Benefit Plans” to the consolidated financial statements, included herein.
87 |
Non-employee directors receive annual fees in the amount of $80,000 each plus reimbursement of their out-of-pocket expenses. In addition, as of January 1, 2020, the non-executive serving as chairman of the Audit Committee receives an annual fee of $25,000, the two members of the Audit Committee (other than the Chairman) receive an annual fee of $20,000 each, the chairman of the Nominating and Governance Committee receives an annual fee of $20,000, and the chairman of the Compensation Committee receives an annual fee of $20,000, plus reimbursement of their out-of-pocket expenses. As of January 1, 2022, each Member of the Nominating and Governance Committee (other than the Chairman) receive an annual fee of $10,000.
C. Board Practices
Board classes
The board of directors of Navios Holdings is divided into three classes with only one class of directors being elected in each year and each class serving a three-year term. The term of office of the first class of directors, consisting of Efstathios Loizos, George Malanga and John Stratakis will expire in 2024. The term of office of the second class of directors, consisting of Shunji Sasada, Spyridon Magoulas and Michael Pearson will expire in 2025. The term of office of the third class of directors, consisting of Angeliki Frangou and Vasiliki Papaefthymiou, will expire in 2023. No directors are entitled to any benefits upon termination of their term.
Audit Committee
The board of directors has established an audit committee of three independent directors. The audit committee is governed by a written charter, which was approved by the board of directors. One of the members of the audit committee is an “audit committee financial expert” for purposes of SEC rules and regulations. The audit committee, among other things, reviews our external financial reporting, engages our external auditors, approves all fees paid to auditors and oversees our internal audit activities and procedures and the adequacy of our internal accounting controls. Our audit committee is comprised of Messrs. George Malanga, Efstathios Loizos and Spyridon Magoulas, and our audit committee financial expert is Mr. Efstathios Loizos, who serves as Chairman.
Nominating and Governance Committee
The board of directors has established a nominating and governance committee of three independent directors, Messrs. John Stratakis, who serves as Chairman, Spyridon Magoulas and George Malanga. This committee is governed by a written charter, which was approved by the board of directors. The nominating and governance committee is responsible for providing assistance to the board of directors in fulfilling its responsibility to the Company’s stockholders relating to the Company’s nominating procedures and practices for appointing officers and directors as well as the Company’s oversight, analysis and recommendations with respect to corporate governance and best practices, and the Company’s process for monitoring compliance with laws and regulations.
Compensation Committee
The board of directors has established a compensation committee of three independent directors, Messrs. Efstathios Loizos, who serves as Chairman, Spyridon Magoulas and John Stratakis. The compensation committee is governed by a written charter, which was approved by the board of directors. The compensation committee is responsible for reviewing and approving the compensation of the Company’s executive officers, for establishing, reviewing and evaluating, in consultation with senior management, the long-term strategy of any employee compensation and approving any material change to existing compensation plans.
Special Committees
The board of directors, from time to time, establishes special conflicts committees to review specific matters that the board believes may involve potential conflicts of interest. The conflicts committees determine if the resolution of the conflict of interest is fair and reasonable to us. The members of the conflicts committees may not be our officers or employees or directors, officers or employees of our affiliate companies, and must meet the independence standards established by the New York Stock Exchange to serve on an audit committee of a board of directors and certain other requirements.
D. Employees
See “Employees and Crewing” under Item 4. B. Business overview.
88 |
E. Share Ownership
The following table sets forth information regarding the beneficial ownership of the common stock of Navios Holdings as of March 17, 2023 based on 53,073,635 which consists of 22,826,450 shares of common stock outstanding as of such date and 30,247,185 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of the Convertible Debenture (as defined herein), by each of Navios Holdings’ executive officers and directors.
Unless otherwise indicated based upon Schedules 13D filed with the SEC and the Company’s knowledge, Navios Holdings believes that all persons named in the table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of common stock beneficially owned by them.
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner
|
Amount and Nature
|
Percentage of
|
Angeliki Frangou(1)(2) | 34,202,521 | 64.1 % |
Georgios Akhniotis | * | * |
Ted C. Petrone | * | * |
Vasiliki Papaefthymiou | * | * |
Anna Kalathakis | * | * |
Shunji Sasada | * | * |
Leonidas Korres | * | * |
Efstratios Desypris | * | * |
Ioannis Karyotis | * | * |
Erifili Tsironi | * | * |
Spyridon Magoulas | * | * |
John Stratakis | * | * |
Efstathios Loizos | * | * |
George Malanga | * | * |
* | Less than 1% |
(1) | Angeliki Frangou’s Schedule 13D indicates that she intends, subject to market conditions, to purchase up to $20.0 million of Navios Holdings’ common stock. As of March 17, 2023, she had purchased approximately $10.0 million in value of our common stock. |
(2) | The amount and nature of beneficial ownership and the percentage of outstanding common stock includes 250,000 options, each for one share, vested but not yet exercised and 30,247,185 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of the Convertible Debenture (as defined herein). |
Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions
A. Major Shareholders
The following table sets forth information regarding the beneficial ownership of the common stock of Navios Holdings as of March 17, 2023 based on shares of common stock outstanding as of such date by each person known by Navios Holdings to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of its outstanding shares of common stock based upon the amounts and percentages as are contained in the public filings of such persons. All such stockholders have the same voting rights with respect to their shares of common stock.
Unless otherwise indicated, based upon Schedules 13D and 13G filed with the SEC and the Company’s knowledge, Navios Holdings believes that all persons named in the table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of common stock beneficially owned by them.
Name
|
Amount and
|
Percentage of
|
Angeliki Frangou(1)(2) | 34,202,521 | 64.1 % |
(1) | The amount and nature of beneficial ownership and the percentage of outstanding common stock includes 250,000 options, each for one share, vested but not yet exercised and 30,247,185 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of the Convertible Debenture (as defined herein). |
(2) | As disclosed in a 13D Amendment dated August 30, 2019, Ms. Frangou has disclosed that she and her affiliate companies have pledged 14,511,171 (before the Reverse Stock Split) of the shares of common stock disclosed in the table above. |
As of March 17, 2023, we had 13 shareholders of record, approximately 8 of which were located in the United States and held an aggregate of approximately 21,827,892 shares of our common stock, representing 95.6% of our outstanding common stock. However, one of the U.S. stockholders of record is CEDE & CO., a nominee of The Depository Trust Company, which held 19,805,229 shares of our common stock as of that date. Accordingly, we believe that the shares held by CEDE & CO. include common stock beneficially owned by both holders in the United States and non-U.S. beneficial owners. We are not aware of any arrangements the operation of which may at a subsequent date result in our change of control.
B. Related Party Transactions
Please see Note 16 “Transactions with Related Parties” to our consolidated financial statements, included elsewhere in this Annual Report for a full description of related party transactions.
C. Interests of experts and counsel.
Not applicable.
Item 8. Financial Information
A. Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information
Consolidated Financial Statements: See Item 18.
Legal Proceedings: Navios Holdings is not involved in any legal proceedings that it believes will have a material adverse effect on its business, financial position, results of operations or liquidity.
From time to time, Navios Holdings may be subject to legal proceedings and claims in the ordinary course of business. It is expected that these claims would be covered by insurance if they involve liabilities such as arise from a collision, other marine casualty, damage to cargoes, oil pollution, death or personal injuries to crew, subject to customary deductibles. Those claims, even if lacking merit, could result in the expenditure of significant financial and managerial resources.
Refer also to Note 14 “Commitments and contingencies” to the consolidated financial statements, included herein.
Dividend Policy: Navios Holdings announced the suspension of dividends to its common stock shareholders in November 2015 and its preferred shareholders, including holders of the Series G and Series H, in February 2016. Navios Holdings intends to retain most of its available earnings generated by operations to conserve cash and improve liquidity. The reinstatement, declaration and payment of any dividend remains subject to the discretion of the Board of Directors, and will depend on, among other things, Navios Holdings’ cash requirements after taking into account market opportunities, debt obligations, market conditions, and restrictions contained in its equity and debt instruments, including limitations on dividends under its preferred stock. (See also Item 5.B. “Long-term Debt Obligations and Credit Arrangements”).
B. Significant Changes
Not applicable.
89 |
Item 9. Listing Details
The principal trading market for our common stock has been the NYSE under the symbol “NM”. Our Series G and Series H ADSs trade on the NYSE under the symbols “NM-PG.” and “NM-PH.”
Item 10. Additional Information
A. Share Capital
Not applicable.
B. Memorandum of articles of association
Please refer to Exhibit 3.1 of Form F-1, filed with the SEC on November 2, 2005 with file number 333-129382 and Exhibit 99.1 of Form 6-K, filed on January 17, 2007 with file number 000-51047, which the Company hereby incorporates by reference. Please also refer to the following filings on Form 6-K or Form 8-A, as applicable, (file number 001-33311) filed with the SEC, each of which the Company hereby incorporates by reference:
• | Exhibit 99.2 of Form 6-K filed on October 6, 2008; |
• | Exhibit 3.1 of Form 6-K filed on July 7, 2009; |
• | Exhibit 3.1 of Form 6-K filed on September 22, 2009; |
• | Exhibit 3.1 of Form 6-K filed on September 24, 2009; |
• | Exhibit 3.1 of Form 6-K filed on February 4, 2010; |
• | Exhibit 1.1 of Form 6-K filed on November 15, 2010; |
• | Exhibit 1.1 of Form 6-K filed on December 22, 2010; |
• | Exhibit 3.3 of Form 8-A filed on January 24, 2014; |
• | Exhibit 3.3 of Form 8-A filed on July 7, 2014 and,; |
• | Exhibit 1.1 of Form 6-K, filed on December 27, 2018. |
C. Material Contracts
Refer to “Item 4. – Information on the Company” for a discussion of various agreements relating to our business, and to Item 5. – Operating and Financial Review and Prospects” for a discussion of our long-term debt, including Item 5.F for a discussion of the long-term debt, the operating lease obligations and the rent obligations. Other than these agreements, there are no material contracts, other than the contracts entered into in the ordinary course of business, to which the Company or any of its subsidiaries is a party.
D. Exchange controls
Under the laws of the Republic of the Marshall Islands, Uruguay, PanamaMalta, Brazil, Paraguay, Cayman Islands and the British Virgin Islands, the countries of incorporation of the Company and its subsidiaries, there are currently no restrictions on the export or import of capital, including foreign exchange controls, or restrictions that affect the remittance of dividends, interest or other payments to non-resident holders of our common stock.
In the case of Argentina, however, it should be noted that local authorities have established certain foreign exchange restrictions that affect the export or import of capital. See “Item 3.D. Risk Factors — Risks Relating to the Counties in which Navios Logistics Operates — Risks Relating to Argentina — “The current and future foreign exchange policy of Argentina may affect the ability of Navios Logistics’ Argentine subsidiary to make cash remittances outside of Argentina.”.
90 |
E. Taxation
Marshall Islands Tax Considerations
Navios Holdings is incorporated in the Republic of the Marshall Islands. Under current Marshall Islands law, Navios Holdings will not be subject to tax on income or capital gains, and no Marshall Islands withholding tax will be imposed upon payments.
Shipping Tax Jurisdictions
The income tax (expense)/ benefit reflected in the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021, and 2020 is mainly attributable to Navios Holdings’ subsidiaries in South America, which are subject to the Argentinean, Brazilian and Paraguayan income tax regime.
CNSA and Corporacion Navios Granos S.A. (“CNGSA”) are located in a tax free zone and are not liable to income tax. Navios Logistics’ current port operations in Uruguay are exempted from income taxes.
As a result of the Law 27,630, voted by the Argentinian Parliament in June 2021, income tax rates and scales were modified. Scales are updated annually as per inflation. Income tax liabilities of the Argentinean subsidiaries for the current period is measured at the amount expected to be paid to the taxation authorities using a tax rate of 35% on any taxable profit above 76 million Argentinean pesos or $429, 30% on any taxable profit between 8 million Argentinian pesos or $42 and 76 Amillion Argentinean pesos or $429, and 25% on any taxable profit below 8 million Argentinean pesos or $42. The enacted Law 27,630 replaced the income tax rates and scales of the tax reform previously voted by the Argentinean Parliament in December 2017, and the Law 27,541 voted in December 2019, in which the corporate income tax rate had decreased from 35% in 2017 to 30% for the period from 2018 to 2021 and would further decrease to 25% for the period from 2022 onwards. Tax rates and tax laws used to assess the income tax liability are those that are effective on the close of the fiscal period.
Under the tax laws of Argentina, the subsidiaries of the Company in that country are subject to taxes levied on gross revenues. Rates differ depending on the jurisdiction where revenues are earned for tax purposes. Average rates were approximately 2.0% for the year ended December 31, 2022 (2.0% for 2021 and 2.0% for 2020, respectively).
Until the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019, there were two possible options to determine the income tax liability of Paraguayan subsidiaries. Under the first option income tax liabilities for the current and prior periods were measured at the amount expected to be paid to the taxation authorities, by applying the tax rate of 10% on the fiscal profit and loss. 50% of revenues derived from international freights were considered Paraguayan sourced (and therefore taxed) if carried between Paraguay and Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil or Uruguay, with destination Paraguay. Alternatively, only 30% of revenues derived from international freights carried between other countries with destination Paraguay were considered Paraguayan sourced. Companies whose operations were considered international freights could choose to pay income taxes on their revenues at an effective tax rate of 1% on such revenues, without considering any other kind of adjustments. Fiscal losses, if any, were neither deducted nor carried forward.
As per the tax reform in Paraguay that is in force since January 1, 2020 (Law 6,380 from September 25, 2019 confirmed by Decree 3182 from December 30, 2019), there are still two possible options to determine the income tax liability of Paraguayan companies. Under the first option income tax liabilities for the current and prior periods are measured at the amount expected to be paid to the taxation authorities, by applying the tax rate of 10% on the fiscal profit and loss. The 100% of revenues derived from freights carried between other countries with destination Paraguay are considered Paraguayan sourced, and therefore taxed. The tax reform also states that any fiscal losses generated as of the fiscal year starting January 1, 2020, will be carried forward for up to five years, with the possibility to deduct each year the 20% from future fiscal years taxable income. Companies whose operations are considered international freights can alternatively choose to pay income taxes on their revenues at an effective tax rate of 3% of such revenues, without considering any other kind of adjustments. Once the methodology is chosen, the Paraguayan companies have to keep it for at least five years.
The corporate income tax rate in Argentina, Paraguay, Brazil, and Uruguay is 30%, 10%, 34%, and 25%, respectively for the year ended December 31, 2021. The Company’s deferred taxes as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, relate primarily to deferred tax liabilities on acquired intangible assets recognized in connection with Navios Logistics. As of January 1, 2007, the Company adopted the provisions of FASB for Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes. This guidance requires application of a more likely than not threshold to the recognition and derecognition of uncertain tax positions. This guidance permits the Company to recognize the amount of tax benefit that has a greater that 50% likelihood of being ultimately realized upon settlement. It further requires that a change in judgment related to the expected ultimate resolution of uncertain tax positions be recognized in earnings in the quarter of such change. Argentinean companies have open tax years ranging from 2014 and onwards and Paraguayan and Brazilian companies have open tax years ranging from 2016 and onwards. In relation to these open tax years, the Company believes that there are no material uncertain tax positions.
91 |
Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations
The following discussion addresses certain U.S. federal income tax considerations applicable to the purchase, ownership and disposition of our common stock. The discussion is based on the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), judicial decisions, administrative pronouncements, and existing and proposed regulations issued by the U.S. Treasury (the “Treasury Regulations”), all of which are subject to change, possibly with retroactive effect. Changes in these authorities may cause the tax consequences to vary substantially from the consequences described below. We have not sought, nor do we intend to seek, any rulings from the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”) with respect to the U.S. federal income tax consequences discussed below. The discussion below is not in any way binding on the IRS or the courts or in any way an assurance that the U.S. federal income tax consequences discussed herein will be accepted by the IRS or the courts.
The U.S. federal income tax consequences to a beneficial owner of our common stock may vary depending on such beneficial owner’s particular situation or status. This discussion is limited to beneficial owners of our common stock who hold our common stock as capital assets, and it does not address aspects of U.S. federal income taxation that may be relevant to persons who are subject to special treatment under U.S. federal income tax laws, including but not limited to: dealers in securities; banks and other financial institutions; insurance companies; tax-exempt entities, plans or accounts; persons holding our common stock as part of a “hedge,” “straddle” or other risk reduction transaction; partnerships or other pass-through entities (or investors in such entities); U.S. persons whose functional currency is not the U.S. dollar; persons that actually or constructively own 10.0% or more (by voting power or value) of our outstanding stock; U.S. expatriates; persons that are accrual method taxpayers required to accelerate the recognition of any item of gross income for U.S. federal income tax purposes as a result of such income being recognized on an applicable financial statement; and persons subject to alternative minimum tax. The following discussion is for general information purposes only and does not address any U.S. state or local tax matters, any non-U.S. tax matters, or any U.S. federal taxes other than income taxes (such as estate and gift taxes or the Medicare tax on certain investment income).
U.S. holders (as defined below) that use an accrual method of accounting for U.S. federal income tax purposes generally are required to include certain amounts in income no later than the time such amounts are reflected on certain applicable financial statements. The application of this rule may require the accrual of income earlier than would be the case under the general U.S. federal income tax rules described below. U.S. Holders that use an accrual method of accounting for U.S. federal income tax purposes should consult with their tax advisors regarding the potential applicability of this rule to their particular situation.
We encourage U.S. holders and non-U.S. holders (as defined below) to consult their own tax advisor regarding the particular U.S. federal, state and local and non-U.S. income and other tax consequences applicable to the purchase, ownership and disposition of our common stock that may be applicable to them.
U.S. Federal Income Taxation of the Company
Taxation of U.S. Holders of our Common Stock
The following discussion is limited to persons that are “U.S. holders” of our common stock. For purposes of this discussion, a “U.S. holder” is a beneficial owner of our common stock that is:
• | an individual U.S. citizen or resident (as determined for U.S. federal income tax purposes); |
• | a corporation (or other entity that is classified as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes) organized under the laws of the U.S. or any of its political subdivisions; |
• | an estate the income of which is subject to U.S. federal income taxation regardless of its source; or |
• | a trust if a court within the U.S. is able to exercise primary supervision over the administration of the trust and one or more U.S. persons (as determined for U.S. federal income tax purposes) have the authority to control all substantial decisions of that trust, or if the trust has validly elected to be treated as a U.S. trust. |
If an entity treated for U.S. federal income tax purposes as a partnership holds our common stock, the tax treatment of a partner in such a partnership will generally depend upon the status of the partner, upon the activities of the partnership and certain determinations made at the partner level. Partners in a partnership that is considering an investment in our common stock should consult their tax advisors.
92 |
Distributions on Our Common Stock
Subject to the discussion of “passive foreign investment companies” below, any distributions that a U.S. holder receives with respect to our common stock generally will constitute dividends, which may be taxable as ordinary income or “qualified dividend income” as described below, to the extent of our current or accumulated earnings and profits (as determined under U.S. federal income tax principles). Distributions in excess of our earnings and profits will be treated first as a non-taxable return of capital to the extent of the U.S. holder’s tax basis in our common stock and thereafter as gain from the sale of such stock. We do not maintain calculations of earnings and profits under U.S. federal income tax principles. Therefore, U.S. holders of our common stock should expect that a distribution with respect to such common stock generally will be treated as dividend income, even if that distribution might otherwise be treated as a non-taxable return of capital or as capital gain under the rules described above.
Because we are not a U.S. corporation, a U.S. holder that is a corporation (or other entity taxable as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes) will not be entitled to claim a dividends-received deduction with respect to any distributions received from us. Dividends paid with respect to our common stock will generally be treated as “passive category income” for purposes of computing allowable foreign tax credits for U.S. foreign tax credit purposes.
Dividends received by a U.S. holder that is an individual, trust or estate from us should be treated as “qualified dividend income,” provided that: (i) our common stock is readily tradable on an established securities market in the U.S., which we expect to be the case, provided that our common stock continues to be listed on the NYSE; (ii) we are not a “passive foreign investment company” for the taxable year during which the dividend is paid or the immediately preceding taxable year (see the discussion below under “—Passive Foreign Investment Company Status”); (iii) the U.S. holder owned our common stock for more than 60 days in the 121-day period beginning 60 days before the date on which the common stock become ex-dividend (and have not entered into certain risk limiting transactions with respect to such common stock); (iv) the U.S. holder is not under an obligation to make related payments with respect to positions in substantially similar or related property; and (v) the U.S. holder does not treat the dividends as “investment income” for purposes of the investment interest deduction.
Qualified dividend income is taxed at the preferential rates applicable to long-term capital gain, depending on the income level of the taxpayer. Dividends a U.S. holder receives from us that are not eligible for the preferential rates will be taxed at the ordinary income rates.
Special rules may apply to any amounts received in respect of our common stock that are treated as “extraordinary dividends.” Generally, an extraordinary dividend is a dividend with respect to a share of our common stock in an amount that is equal to or in excess of 10.0% of a U.S. holder’s adjusted tax basis (or fair market value in certain circumstances) in such share of common stock. In addition, extraordinary dividends include dividends received within a one-year period that, in the aggregate, equal or exceed 20.0% of the U.S. holder’s adjusted tax basis (or fair market value in certain circumstances). If we pay an extraordinary dividend on any shares of our common stock that is treated as “qualified dividend income,” and a U.S. holder is an individual, estate or trust, then any loss derived from a subsequent sale or exchange of such shares of our common stock will be treated as long-term capital loss to the extent of such dividend.
Sale, Exchange or Other Disposition of Common Stock
Provided that we are not a passive foreign investment company for any taxable year during which a U.S. holder holds our common stock, the U.S. holder generally will recognize capital gain or loss upon a sale, exchange or other disposition of our common stock in an amount equal to the difference, if any, between the amount realized by the U.S. holder from such sale, exchange or other disposition and the U.S. holder’s tax basis in such common stock. Any such gain or loss will be treated as long-term capital gain or loss if the U.S. holder’s holding period is greater than one year at the time of the sale, exchange or other disposition. Any such capital gain or loss will generally be treated as U.S. source income or loss, as applicable, for U.S. foreign tax credit purposes. For a U.S. holder who is an individual, trust or estate, its long-term capital gains are currently subject to tax at preferential rates. The ability of a U.S. holder to deduct capital losses against ordinary income is subject to limitations.
93 |
Passive Foreign Investment Company Status
Special U.S. federal income tax rules apply to U.S. holders who hold stock in a non-U.S. corporation that is classified as a passive foreign investment company (“PFIC”) for U.S. federal income tax purposes. In general, we will be a PFIC for any taxable year in which, after applying certain look-through rules, either:
• | at least 75.0% of our gross income for such taxable year consists of “passive income” (e.g., dividends, interest, capital gains and rents derived other than in the active conduct of a rental business); or |
• | at least 50.0% of the quarterly average value of our assets during such taxable year consists of “passive assets” (i.e., assets that produce, or are held for the production of, passive income). |
For purposes of determining whether we are a PFIC, we will be treated as earning and owning our proportionate share of the income and assets, respectively, of any of our subsidiary corporations in which we own at least 25.0% of the value of the subsidiary’s stock. Income we earn, or are deemed to earn, in connection with the performance of services will not constitute passive income. By contrast, rental income will generally constitute passive income (unless we are treated under certain special rules as deriving our rental income in the active conduct of a trade or business).
Based upon our actual and projected income, assets and activities, we intend to take the position, to the extent we are required to do so, that we were not a PFIC for our taxable year ended December 31, 2022 and that we will not become a PFIC for the forseeable future, although there can be no assurances in this regard. For taxable years after 2022, whether we are a PFIC will depend largely on the income, assets and activities of Navios Logistics, as well as any other income we earn or are deemed to earn and assets we own or are deemed to own.
We believe that there is a significant amount of legal authority consisting of the Code, legislative history and IRS pronouncements and rulings supporting our position that income we derive or are deemed to derive from our port terminal, time charter and voyage charter operations constitutes services income (rather than rental income). However, it should be noted that this authority is in other contexts and there is no direct legal authority under the PFIC rules addressing whether income from port terminal, time charter or voyage charter operations is services income or rental income (or otherwise constitutes passive income) and there is also contrary authority in other contexts, including authority which characterizes certain types of income we earn or are deemed to earn as rental income rather than services income. Accordingly, no assurance can be given that the IRS or a court of law will accept this position and there is a risk that the IRS or a court of law could determine that we are a PFIC. In addition, no assurance can be given as to our current and future PFIC status, because such status requires an annual factual determination based upon the composition of our income and assets for the entire taxable year. The PFIC determination also depends on the application of complex U.S. federal income tax rules concerning the classification of our income and assets for this purpose, and there are legal uncertainties involved in determining whether the income derived from our chartering activities and from our logistics activities constitutes rental income or income derived from the performance of services. Moreover, the applicability of the relevant legal authorities to our business and organizational structure is not entirely clear and is subject to differing interpretations. We have not sought, and we do not expect to seek, an IRS ruling on this issue. As a result, the IRS or a court could disagree with our position. In addition, although we intend to conduct our affairs in a manner to avoid, to the extent possible, being classified as a PFIC with respect to any taxable year, we cannot provide any assurance that the nature of our operations, or the nature or composition of our income or assets, will not change in the future, or that we can avoid PFIC status in the future.
As discussed below, if we are a PFIC for a taxable year during which a U.S. holder actually or constructively owns our common stock, the U.S. holder generally would be subject to one of three different U.S. federal income tax regimes, depending on whether or not the taxpayer makes certain elections. Additionally, for each year during which we are treated as a PFIC and a U.S. holder actually or constructively owns common stock the U.S. holder generally will be required to file IRS Form 8621 with its U.S. federal income tax return to report certain information concerning its ownership of our common stock. In the event that a person that is required to file IRS Form 8621 does not file such form, a substantial penalty may apply and, in addition, the statute of limitations on the assessment and collection of U.S. federal income taxes of such person for the related tax year may not close until three years after the date that the required information is filed.
The PFIC rules are complex, and U.S. holders are encouraged to consult their own tax advisors regarding the PFIC rules, including the annual PFIC reporting requirement.
Taxation of U.S. Holders That Make a Timely QEF Election
If we were treated as a PFIC for any taxable year during which a U.S. holder actually or constructively holds our common stock, and if such U.S. holder makes a timely election to treat us as a “Qualifying Electing Fund” for U.S. tax purposes (a “QEF Election”), such U.S. holder would be required to report each year its pro rata share of our ordinary earnings (as ordinary income) and our net capital gain (as long-term capital gain), if any, for our taxable year that ends with or within the individual’s taxable year, regardless of whether we make any distributions to that U.S. holder. Such income inclusions would not be eligible for the preferential tax rates applicable to qualified dividend income. Adjusted tax basis in our common stock would be increased to reflect such taxed but undistributed earnings and profits. Distributions of earnings and profits that had previously been taxed would result in a corresponding reduction in a U.S. holder’s adjusted tax basis in our common stock and would not be taxed again once distributed. A U.S. holder would generally recognize capital gain or loss on the sale, exchange or other disposition of our common stock. Even if an individual U.S. holder makes a QEF Election for one of our taxable years, if we were a PFIC for a prior taxable year during which the U.S. holder held our common stock and for which a timely QEF Election was not made, the U.S. holder would also be subject to the more adverse rules described below under “—Taxation of U.S. Holders That Make No Election.” Additionally, to the extent any of our subsidiaries is a PFIC, an election to treat us as a “Qualifying Electing Fund” would not be effective with respect to a deemed ownership of the stock of such subsidiary and a separate QEF Election with respect to such subsidiary would be required.
94 |
A U.S. holder would make a QEF Election by completing and filing IRS Form 8621 with your U.S. federal income tax return for the year for which the election is made in accordance with the relevant instructions. If we were to become aware that we were a PFIC for any taxable year, we would notify all U.S. holders of such treatment and would provide all necessary information to any U.S. holder who requests such information in order to make the QEF Election described above with respect to us and the relevant subsidiaries.
A QEF Election generally will not have any effect with respect to any taxable year for which we are not a PFIC, but will remain in effect with respect to any subsequent taxable year for which we are a PFIC. It should be noted that the beneficial effect of a QEF Election may be substantially diminished if such election is not made in the first year of a U.S. holder’s holding period in which we are a PFIC. If some instances, a U.S. holder may be permitted to make a QEF election that is retroactive to the beginning of your holding period if we unexpectedly are treated as a PFIC.
Taxation of U.S. Holders That Make a Timely “Mark-to-Market” Election
Alternatively, if we were to be treated as a PFIC for any taxable year during which a U.S. holder actually or constructively owns our common stock and, our common stock is treated as “marketable stock,” such U.S. holder would be allowed to make a “mark-to-market” election with respect to our common stock, provided that such U.S. holder completes and file IRS Form 8621 with its U.S. federal income tax return for the year for which the election is made in accordance with the relevant instructions. If that election is made, such U.S. holder generally would include as ordinary income in each taxable year the excess, if any, of the fair market value of our common stock at the end of the taxable year over your adjusted tax basis in our common stock. Such a U.S. holder also would be permitted an ordinary loss in respect of the excess, if any, of its adjusted tax basis in our common stock over the fair market value of such common stock at the end of the taxable year (but only to the extent of the net amount of gain previously included in income as a result of the mark-to-market election). Such a U.S. holder’s tax basis in our common stock would be adjusted to reflect any such income or loss amount. Gain realized on the sale, exchange or other disposition of our common stock would be treated as ordinary income, and any loss realized on the sale, exchange or other disposition of the common stock would be treated as ordinary loss to the extent that such loss does not exceed the net mark-to-market gains that such U.S. holder previously included. However, to the extent any of our subsidiaries is a PFIC, a U.S. holder’s “mark-to-market” election with respect to our common stock would not apply to the U.S. holder’s deemed ownership of the stock of such subsidiary. This may significantly limit the beneficial effect of making a mark-to-market election.
It should be noted that the beneficial effect of a “mark-to-market” election may be substantially diminished if such election is not made in the first year of your holding period in which we are a PFIC.
Taxation of U.S. Holders That Make No Election
Finally, if we were treated as a PFIC for any taxable year during which a U.S. holder actually or constructively owns our common stock, and the U.S. holder does not make either a QEF Election or a “mark-to-market” election for that year, such U.S. holder would be subject to special rules with respect to (a) any excess distribution (that is, the portion of any distributions that such U.S. holder receives on our common stock in a taxable year in excess of 125.0% of the average annual distributions that such U.S. holder received in the three preceding taxable years, or, if shorter, such U.S. holder’s holding period for our common stock) and (b) any gain realized on the sale, exchange or other disposition of our common stock. Under these special rules: (i) the excess distribution or gain would be allocated ratably over such U.S. holder’s aggregate holding period for our common stock (ii) the amount allocated to the U.S. holder’s current taxable year would be taxed as ordinary income; (iii) the amount allocated to each of the other taxable years of the U.S. holder would be subject to tax at the highest rate of tax in effect for the applicable class of taxpayer for that year; and (iv) an interest charge for the deemed deferral benefit would be imposed with respect to the resulting tax attributable to each such other taxable year.
If a U.S. holder died while owning our common stock, such U.S. holder’s successor generally would not receive a step-up in tax basis with respect to such shares for U.S. tax purposes.
If we are treated as a PFIC during any taxable year during a U.S. holder’s holding period, unless the U.S. holder makes a timely QEF Election, or a timely “mark-to-market” election, for the first taxable year in which the U.S. holder hold our common stock, we will continue to be treated as a PFIC for all succeeding years during which the U.S. holder is treated as a direct or indirect U.S. holder, even if we are not a PFIC for such years. Each U.S. holder is encouraged to consult its own tax advisor with respect to any available elections that may be applicable in such a situation, as well as the IRS information and filing obligations that may arise as a result of the ownership of shares in a PFIC.
95 |
Taxation of Non-U.S. Holders
A “non-U.S. holder” is a beneficial owner of our common stock that is not an entity or arrangement treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes and not a U.S. holder.
Distributions on Our Common Stock
A non-U.S. holder generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income or withholding taxes on a distribution with respect to our common stock, unless the income arising from such distribution is effectively connected with the non-U.S. holder’s conduct of a trade or business in the United States. If a non-U.S. holder is entitled to the benefits of an applicable income tax treaty with respect to that income, such income generally is taxable in the U.S. only if it is attributable to a permanent establishment maintained by the non-U.S. holder in the United States.
Sale, Exchange or Other Disposition of Our Common Stock
A non-U.S. holder of our common stock generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax or withholding tax on any gain realized upon the sale, exchange or other disposition of our common stock, unless:
• | the gain is effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business in the United States (and, if the non-U.S. holder is entitled to the benefits of an applicable income tax treaty with respect to that gain, that gain is attributable to a permanent establishment maintained by the non-U.S. holder in the United States); or |
• | the non-U.S. holder is an individual who is present in the U.S. for 183 days or more during the taxable year of disposition (but is not considered a resident of the Unites States under specific rules) and certain other conditions are met. |
Gain that is effectively connected with a non-U.S. holder’s conduct of a trade or business in the United States (or so treated) generally will be subject to U.S. federal income tax, net of certain deductions, at regular U.S. federal income tax rates. A corporate non-U.S. holder’s earnings and profits that are attributable to the effectively connected income (subject to certain adjustments) may be subject to an additional U.S. branch profits tax at a rate of 30.0% (or such lower rate as may be specified by an applicable income tax treaty).
Gain described in clause the second bullet point above (net of certain U.S.-source losses) will be taxed at a flat rate of 30.0% (or such lower rate as may be specified by an applicable tax treaty).
U.S. Backup Withholding and Information Reporting
In general, a non-corporate U.S. holder’s distributions and proceeds from the disposition of our common stock may be subject to information reporting requirements. These payments to a non-corporate U.S. holder may also be subject to backup withholding tax if the non-corporate U.S. holder: (i) fails to provide an accurate taxpayer identification number; (ii) is notified by the IRS that it has become subject to backup withholding due to a prior failure to report all interest or distributions required to be shown on its federal income tax returns; or (iii) fails to comply with applicable certification requirements.
A non-U.S. holder may be required to establish your exemption from information reporting and backup withholding by certifying your non-U.S. status on IRS Form W-8BEN, W-8BEN-E, W-8ECI or W-8IMY, as applicable.
Backup withholding tax is not an additional tax. Rather, a U.S. holder or non-U.S. holder generally may obtain a refund of any amounts withheld under backup withholding rules that exceed its income tax liability by accurately completing and timely filing a refund claim with the IRS.
96 |
Tax Return Disclosure Requirements
Individual U.S. holders (and to the extent specified in applicable Treasury Regulations, certain individual non-U.S. holders and certain U.S. holders that are entities) that hold certain specified foreign assets with values in excess of certain dollar thresholds are required to report such assets on IRS Form 8938 with their U.S. federal income tax return, subject to certain exceptions (including an exception for foreign assets held in accounts maintained with U.S. financial institutions). Stock in a foreign corporation, including our common stock is a specified foreign asset for this purpose, unless such stock is held in an account maintained with a U.S. financial institution. Substantial penalties apply for failure to properly complete and file Form 8938. You are encouraged to consult your own tax advisor regarding the filing of this form. Additionally, in the event that an individual U.S. holder (and to the extent specified in applicable Treasury Regulations, an individual non-U.S. holder or a U.S. entity) that is required to file IRS Form 8938 does not file such form, a substantial penalty may apply and, in addition, the statute of limitations on the assessment and collection of U.S. federal income taxes of such person for the related tax year may not close until three years after the date that the required information is filed. U.S. holders (including U.S. entities) and non-U.S. holders should consult their own tax advisors regarding their reporting obligations with respect to specified foreign assets.
F. Dividends and paying agents
Not applicable.
G. Statement by experts
Not applicable.
H. Documents on display
We are subject to the informational requirements of the Exchange Act. Accordingly, we are required to file reports and other information with the SEC, including annual reports on Form 20-F and reports on Form 6-K. The SEC maintains an Internet website that contains reports and other information about issuers, like us, that file electronically with the SEC. The address of that website is www.sec.gov.
We also make available on our website, free of charge, our Annual Report and the text of our reports on Form 6-K, including any amendments to these reports, as well as certain other SEC filings, as soon as reasonably practicable after they are electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC. Our website address is www.navios.com. The information contained on our website is not incorporated by reference in this Annual Report.
I. Subsidiary information
Not applicable.
Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risks
Navios Holdings is exposed to certain risks related to interest rate, foreign currency, fuel price inflation and time charter rate fluctuation.
Interest Rate Risk:
Debt Instruments — On December 31, 2022 and 2021, Navios Holdings had a total of $686.8 million and $835.5 million, respectively, of long-term indebtedness. All of the Company’s debt is U.S. dollar-denominated. The the 2024 Notes, the Convertible Debenture, the 2025 Logistics Senior Notes and four Navios Logistics’ loans bear interest at a fixed rate; the remaining balance of Company’s debt bears interest at a floating rate as discussed in “Item 5.B Liquidity and Capital Resources”.
Changes in interest rates for our floating-rate loan facilities would affect their interest rate and related interest expense. As of December 31, 2022, the outstanding amount of the Company’s floating rate loan facilities was $14.0 million. A change in the LIBOR and SOFR rate of 100 basis points would increase interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2022, by $0.2 million. The interest rate on the 2024 Notes, the Convertible Debenture, the 2025 Logistics Senior Notes and four Navios Logistics’ loans are fixed and, therefore, changes in interest rates affect their fair value, which as of December 31, 2022 was $672.9 million, but do not affect their related interest expense.
97 |
For a detailed discussion of Navios Holdings’ debt instruments refer to section “Long-Term Debt Obligations and Credit Arrangements” included in Item 5.B. of this Annual Report.
Foreign Currency Risk:
Our operating results, which are reported in U.S. dollars, may be affected by fluctuations in the exchange rate between the U.S. dollar and other South American currencies. We use the U.S. dollar as our functional and reporting currency. Therefore, revenue and expense accounts are translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rate in effect at the date of each transaction.
Although Navios Holdings’ revenues are U.S. dollar-based, 59.3% of its expenses from continuing operations, related to its Navios Logistics segment, are in Uruguayan pesos, Argentinean pesos, Paraguayan Guaranies and Brazilian Reales. Navios Holdings monitors its Argentine Peso, Uruguayan Peso, Paraguayan Guarani and Brazilian Real exposure against long-term currency forecasts and enters into foreign currency contracts when considered appropriate.
Inflation and Fuel Price Increases:
The impact of inflation on prices in the South American countries in which Navios Logistics operates and the effects of the current war in Ukraine may not be fully neutralized by equivalent adjustments in the rate of exchange between the local currencies and the U.S. dollar. Specifically, for its Barge and Cabotage Businesses, Navios Logistics negotiated, and will continue to negotiate, fuel price adjustment clauses; however, in some cases, prices that Navios Logistics pays for fuel are temporarily not aligned with the adjustments that Navios Logistics obtains under its freight contracts.
Item 12. Description of Securities Other than Equity Securities
Not applicable.
PART II
Item 13. Defaults, Dividend Arrearages and Delinquencies
In February 2016, Navios Holdings announced the suspension of payment of quarterly dividends on the Company’s Series G and Series H preferred shares. On July 15, 2017, the Company reached six quarterly dividend payments in arrears relating to its Series G and Series H and as a result the respective dividend rate increased by 0.25%. As of the date of this Annual Report, the Company has reached 13 quarterly dividend payments in arrears relating to its Series G and Series H preferred shares.
Item 14. Material Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders and Use of Proceeds
None.
Item 15. Controls and Procedures
A. Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Company’s management, with the participation of its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, conducted an evaluation, pursuant to Rule 13a-15 (e) promulgated under the Exchange Act, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2022. Based on this evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2022.
Disclosure controls and procedures means controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and that such information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.
98 |
B. Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
The management of Navios Holdings is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act. Navios Holdings’ internal control system was designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the U.S.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Navios Holdings’ management assessed the effectiveness of Navios Holdings’ internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2022. In making this assessment, it used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013). Based on its assessment, management concluded that, as of December 31, 2022, Navios Holdings’ internal control over financial reporting is effective based on those criteria.
Navios Holdings’ independent registered public accounting firm has issued an attestation report on Navios Holdings’ internal control over financial reporting.
C. Attestation Report of the Registered Public Accounting Firm
Navios Holdings’ independent registered public accounting firm has issued an audit report on Navios Holdings’ internal control over financial reporting. This report appears on Page F-2 of the Consolidated Financial Statements.
D. Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes in internal controls over financial reporting (identified in connection with management’s evaluation of such internal controls over financial reporting) that occurred during the year covered by this Annual Report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, Navios Holdings’ internal controls over financial reporting.
Item 16. [Reserved]
Item 16A. Audit Committee financial expert
Navios Holdings’ Audit Committee consists of three independent directors, Spyridon Magoulas, Efstathios Loizos and George Malanga. The Board of Directors has determined that Efstathios Loizos qualifies as “an audit committee financial expert” as defined in the instructions of Item 16A of Form 20-F. Mr. Loizos is independent under applicable NYSE and SEC standards.
Item 16B. Code of Ethics
Navios Holdings has adopted a code of ethics, the Navios Code of Corporate Conduct and Ethics, applicable to officers, directors and employees of Navios Holdings that complies with applicable guidelines issued by the SEC. The Navios Code of Corporate Conduct and Ethics is available for review on Navios Holdings’ website at www.navios.com.
Item 16C. Principal Accountant Fees and Services
Audit Fees
Our principal accountants for fiscal years 2022 and 2021 were PricewaterhouseCoopers S.A. The audit fees for the audit of the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021 were $1.3 million and $1.4 million, respectively.
The Audit Committee is responsible for the appointment, replacement, compensation, evaluation and oversight of the work of the independent auditors. As part of this responsibility, the audit committee pre-approves the audit and non-audit services performed by the independent auditors in order to assure that they do not impair the auditors’ independence from the Company. The Audit Committee may delegate, to one or more of its designated members, the authority to grant such pre-approvals. The decision of any member to whom such authority is delegated is be presented to the full Committee at each of its scheduled meetings.
All audit services and other services provided by PricewaterhouseCoopers S.A. were pre-approved by the Audit Committee.
99 |
Audit-Related Fees
There were no audit-related fees billed in 2022 and 2021.
Tax Fees
There were no tax fees billed in 2022 and 2021.
All Other Fees
There were no other fees billed in 2022 and 2021.
Item 16D. Exemptions from the Listing Standards for Audit Committees
Not applicable.
Item 16E. Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers
On October 21, 2022, Navios Holdings repurchased a total of 20,185 Series G ADSs in exchange for aggregate cash consideration of $0.3 million and a total of 584,158 Series H ADSs in exchange for aggregate cash consideration of $8.9 million, pursuant to a tender offer. Please refer also to Note 17 “Preferred and Common Stock” to the consolidated financial statements included herein.
Item 16F. Changes in Registrant’s Certifying Accountant
Not applicable.
Item 16G. Corporate Governance
Pursuant to an exception for foreign private issuers, we are not required to comply with the corporate governance practices followed by U.S. companies under the NYSE listing standards. However, we have voluntarily adopted all of the NYSE required practices, except that, as permitted under Marshall Islands law, we do not need or intend to obtain prior shareholder approval to adopt or re-use equity compensation plans, including our 2015 Equity Incentive Plan.
Item 16H. Mine Safety disclosures
Not applicable.
Item 16I. Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections.
Not applicable.
PART III
Item 17. | Financial Statements |
See Item 18.
Item 18. | Financial Statements |
The financial information required by this Item is set forth on pages F-1 to F-56 and are filed as part of this Annual Report.
The audited consolidated financial statements of Navios Partners as of December 31, 2022 and 2021 and for the years ended December 31, 2022, December 31, 2021, and December 31, 2020 included in the Annual Report on Form 20-F filed by Navios Partners with the SEC on March 24, 2023 are incorporated by reference.
100 |
Item 19. Exhibits
101 |
SIGNATURE
Navios Maritime Holdings Inc. hereby certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing its Annual Report on Form 20-F and that it has duly caused and authorized the undersigned to sign this Annual Report on its behalf.
Navios Maritime Holdings Inc. | ||
By: | /s/ Angeliki Frangou | |
Name: Angeliki Frangou | ||
Title: Chairwoman and Chief Executive Officer |
Date: March 27, 2023
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
F- 1 |
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Navios Maritime Holdings Inc.
Opinions on the Financial Statements and Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Navios Maritime Holdings Inc. and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, and the related consolidated statements of comprehensive income/(loss), of changes in equity and of cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2022, including the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). We also have audited the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2022, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2022 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2022, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the COSO.
Basis for Opinions
The Company's management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting appearing under Item 15(b). Our responsibility is to express opinions on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud, and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.
Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
F- 2 |
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Critical Audit Matter
The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (i) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (ii) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.
Goodwill impairment assessment in the logistics business
As disclosed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the carrying amount of the Company’s goodwill is approximately $104.1 million as of December 31, 2022, attributable to the logistics business. Goodwill is tested for impairment at the reporting unit level at least annually, and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value of goodwill may not be recoverable. Management compares the aggregate fair value of the reporting unit to its carrying amount, including goodwill. Goodwill impairment loss is measured as the amount by which a reporting unit’s carrying amount exceeds its fair value. Management determines the fair value of its logistics reporting unit using the income approach (i.e. discounted cash flow method). Management forecasts all the expected net cash flows associated with the reporting unit, which includes the application of a terminal value for the period after forecast and applies a discount rate to arrive at the fair value. Expected net cash flows include EBITDA and future capital expenditures assumptions. EBITDA assumptions include revenue assumptions and direct and general and administrative expense assumptions. As disclosed by management the significant factors and assumptions used in its discounted cash flow analysis for the logistics reporting unit include the estimated time charter, voyage and port revenues for the unfixed days, the terminal value, terminal growth rate and the discount rate (i.e. ‘‘WACC’’) used to calculate the present value of future cash flows. The estimated time charter, voyage and port revenue for the unfixed days were determined by considering revenues from existing contracts and estimated revenues for the unfixed days, based on historical performance, including utilization rates and storage capacity. Terminal growth rate was determined by taking into consideration industry and market conditions. The WACC was based on externally observable data considering market participants’ and the Company’s cost of equity and debt, optimal capital structure and risk factors specific to the Company.
The principal considerations for our determination that performing procedures relating to the goodwill impairment assessment in the logistics business is a critical audit matter are (i) the significant judgment by management when determining the fair value of the reporting unit; (ii) a high degree of auditor judgment, subjectivity and audit effort in performing procedures and evaluating management’s significant assumptions related to the estimated time charter, voyage and port revenues for the unfixed days, the terminal value, the terminal growth rate and the WACC; and (iii) the audit effort involved the use of professionals with specialized skill and knowledge.
Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming our overall opinion on the consolidated financial statements. These procedures included testing the effectiveness of controls relating to management’s goodwill impairment assessment in the logistics business, including controls over the fair value estimate of the reporting unit. These procedures also included, among others, (i) evaluating the appropriateness of the discounted cash flow model utilized by management; (ii) testing management’s process for determining the fair value of the reporting unit; (iii) testing the completeness, accuracy and relevance of underlying data used in the model; and (iv) evaluating the significant assumptions used by management related to the estimated time charter, voyage and port revenues for the unfixed days, the terminal value, the terminal growth rate and the WACC. Evaluating management’s assumptions related to the estimated time charter, voyage and port revenues for the unfixed days, the terminal value, terminal growth rate and the WACC, involved evaluating whether the assumptions used by management were reasonable considering (i) the current and past performance of the reporting unit, (ii) the consistency with external market data; and (iii) whether these assumptions were consistent with evidence obtained in other areas of the audit. Professionals with specialized skill and knowledge were engaged to assist in evaluating the appropriateness of management’s discounted cash flow model, evaluating the reasonableness of the estimated time charter, voyage and port revenue for the unfixed days the terminal value, terminal growth rate used in discounted cash flow model and developing an independent estimate of the WACC.
/s/
March 27, 2023
We have served as the Company’s (or its predecessor) auditor since 2002.
F- 3 |
NAVIOS MARITIME HOLDINGS INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars — except share data)
Notes | December 31, 2022 |
December 31, 2021 | ||||||
ASSETS | ||||||||
Current assets | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | 4, 12 | $ | $ | | ||||
Restricted cash | 4, 11, 12 | | ||||||
Accounts receivable, net | 5 | | ||||||
Inventories | | |||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 6 | | ||||||
Total current assets, continuing operations | ||||||||
Current assets from discontinued operations | 3 | |||||||
Total current assets | ||||||||
Vessels, port terminals and other fixed assets, net | 7 | |||||||
Deferred dry dock and special survey costs, net | ||||||||
Investments in affiliate companies | 9 | |||||||
Other long-term assets | 7 | |||||||
Operating lease assets | 15 | |||||||
Intangible assets other than goodwill | 8 | |||||||
Goodwill | 2 | |||||||
Total non-current assets, continuing operations | ||||||||
Non-current assets from discontinued operations | 3 | |||||||
Total non-current assets | ||||||||
Total assets | $ | $ | ||||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | ||||||||
Current liabilities | ||||||||
Accounts payable | $ | $ | | |||||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities | 8, 10, 16 | | ||||||
Deferred income and cash received in advance | 16 | | ||||||
Operating lease liabilities, current portion | 15 | | ||||||
Due to affiliate companies | 16 | | ||||||
Current portion of loans payable to affiliate companies | 11, 12, 16 | |||||||
Current portion of long-term debt, net | 11, 12 | | ||||||
Current portion of promissory note | 16 | | ||||||
Current portion of senior and ship mortgage notes, net | 11, 12 | |||||||
Total current liabilities, continuing operations | ||||||||
Current liabilities from discontinued operations | 3 | |||||||
Total current liabilities | ||||||||
Senior and ship mortgage notes, net of current portion | 11, 12 | | ||||||
Long-term debt, net of current portion | 11, 12 | | ||||||
Convertible debenture payable to affiliate companies | 11, 16 | |||||||
Long term portion, promissory note | 16 | |||||||
Loans payable to affiliate companies, net of current portion | 11, 12, 16 | |||||||
Other long-term liabilities and deferred income | 16 | |||||||
Deferred voyage revenue, non current portion | ||||||||
Operating lease liabilities, net of current portion | 15 | |||||||
Deferred tax liability | 20 | |||||||
Total non-current liabilities, continuing operations | ||||||||
Non-current liabilities from discontinued operations | 3 | |||||||
Total non-current liabilities | ||||||||
Total liabilities | ||||||||
Commitments and contingencies | 14 | |||||||
Stockholders’ equity | ||||||||
Preferred Stock — $ par value, authorized shares, and issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. | 17 | |||||||
Common stock — $ par value, authorized shares, and issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. | 17 | |||||||
Additional paid-in capital | ||||||||
Accumulated deficit | ( |
( | ||||||
Total Navios Holdings stockholders’ equity | ||||||||
Noncontrolling interest | ||||||||
Total stockholders’ equity | ||||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity | $ | $ |
See notes to the consolidated financial statements
F- 4 |
NAVIOS MARITIME HOLDINGS INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME/(LOSS)
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars — except share and per share data)
Notes | Year Ended December 31, 2022 |
Year Ended December 31, 2021 |
Year Ended December 31, 2020 | ||||||||
Revenue | 2 | $ | $ | $ | |||||||
Time charter, voyage and logistics business expenses | 15, 16 | ( |
( |
( | |||||||
Direct vessel expenses | 16 | ( |
( |
( | |||||||
General and administrative expenses | 16 | ( |
( |
( | |||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 7, 8 | ( |
( |
( | |||||||
Allowance for credit losses | 5 | ( |
( |
( | |||||||
Interest income | 16 | ||||||||||
Interest expense and finance cost | 18 | ( |
( |
( | |||||||
Impairment loss/ loss on sale of vessels | 7, 12, 15 | ( |
( |
||||||||
Loss on bond and debt extinguishment | 11 | ( | |||||||||
Non-operating other finance cost | 11, 16 | ( |
|||||||||
Other income | 16, 2 | ||||||||||
Other expense | 9, 21 | ( |
( |
( | |||||||
(Loss)/income before equity in net (losses)/earnings of affiliate companies | $ | ( |
$ | ( |
$ | ||||||
Equity in net (losses)/earnings of affiliate companies | 9, 16 | ( |
( | ||||||||
(Loss)/income before taxes | $ | ( |
$ | $ | ( | ||||||
Income tax benefit/(expense) | 20 | ( |
( | ||||||||
Net (loss)/income from continuing operations | $ | ( |
$ | $ | ( | ||||||
Net income/(loss) from discontinued operations (including gain from sale of $ |
3 | ( | |||||||||
Net income/(loss) | $ | $ | $ | ( | |||||||
Less: Net loss/(income) attributable to the noncontrolling interest | ( | ||||||||||
Net income/(loss) attributable to Navios Holdings | $ | $ | $ | ( | |||||||
Net income/(loss) attributable to Navios Holdings from continuing and discontinued operations: | |||||||||||
(Loss)/income attributable to Navios Holdings, basic and diluted from continuing operations | $ | ( |
$ | $ | ( | ||||||
Income/(loss) attributable to Navios Holdings, basic and diluted from discontinued operations | $ | $ | $ | ( | |||||||
Income/(loss) attributable to Navios Holdings common stockholders, basic and diluted | 19 | $ | $ | $ | ( | ||||||
Basic (loss)/earnings per share attributable to Navios Holdings common stockholders from continuing operations | $ | ( |
$ | $ | ( | ||||||
Basic earnings/(loss) per share attributable to Navios Holdings common stockholders from discontinued operations | ( | ||||||||||
Basic earnings/(loss) per share attributable to Navios Holdings common stockholders | $ | $ | $ | ( | |||||||
Weighted average number of shares, basic | 19 | |
|||||||||
Diluted (loss)/earnings per share attributable to Navios Holdings common stockholders from continuing operations | $ | ( |
$ | $ | ( | ||||||
Diluted earnings/(loss) per share attributable to Navios Holdings common stockholders from discontinued operations | ( | ||||||||||
Diluted earnings/(loss) per share attributable to Navios Holdings common stockholders | ( | ||||||||||
Weighted average number of shares, diluted | |
|
|||||||||
Total comprehensive income/(loss) | ( | ||||||||||
Comprehensive loss/(income) attributable to noncontrolling interest | $ | $ | $ | ( | |||||||
Total comprehensive income/(loss) attributable to Navios Holdings common stockholders | $ | $ | |
$ | ( |
See notes to the consolidated financial statements
F- 5 |
NAVIOS MARITIME HOLDINGS INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars)
Notes | Year Ended December 31, 2022 |
Year Ended December 31, 2021 |
Year Ended December 31, 2020 | ||||||||
OPERATING ACTIVITIES: | |||||||||||
Net income/(loss) | $ | $ | $ | ( | |||||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income/(loss) to net cash provided by operating activities: | |||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 7, 8 | |
|||||||||
Amortization and write-off of deferred financing costs | 18 | |
|||||||||
Amortization of deferred drydock and special survey costs | |
||||||||||
Allowance for credit losses | 5 | |
|||||||||
Stock-based compensation expenses | 13 | |
|||||||||
(Loss)/gain on bond and debt extinguishment, net | 11 | |
( |
( | |||||||
Income tax (benefit)/ expense | 20 | ( |
|||||||||
Equity in net losses/(earnings) of affiliate companies, net of dividends received | 9, 16 | |
( |
||||||||
Impairment loss/ loss on sale of vessels, net | 7, 15 | |
|||||||||
Impairment of loan receivable from affiliate company | 9 | ||||||||||
Non operating other finance cost (convertible debenture) | 11, 16 | |
|||||||||
Gain on sale of shipping business | 3 | ( |
|||||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | |||||||||||
Increase in accounts receivable | ( |
( |
( | ||||||||
(Increase)/decrease in inventories | ( |
( | |||||||||
Decrease/(increase) in prepaid expenses and other assets | |
( | |||||||||
Decrease in due from affiliate companies | |
||||||||||
(Decrease)/increase in accounts payable | ( |
||||||||||
(Decrease)/increase in accrued expenses and other liabilities | ( |
( |
|||||||||
Decrease in operating lease liabilities, net | ( |
( |
( | ||||||||
Increase/(decrease) in due to affiliate companies | |
( |
|||||||||
(Decrease)/increase in deferred income and cash received in advance | ( |
( |
|||||||||
Increase/(decrease) in other long-term liabilities and deferred income | ( | ||||||||||
Payments for drydock and special survey costs | ( |
( |
( | ||||||||
Convertible debenture movement | |
||||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | $ | |
$ | $ | |||||||
INVESTING ACTIVITIES: | |||||||||||
Proceeds from the Transaction | 3 | ||||||||||
Cash disposed of due to the Transaction | 17 | ( |
|||||||||
Loan from affiliate companies | 16 | ||||||||||
Dividends received from affiliate companies | 9 | ||||||||||
Deposits for vessels, port terminals and other fixed assets | 7 | ( |
( |
( | |||||||
Proceeds from lease receivable | 15 | ||||||||||
Proceeds from sale of asset | 7 | ||||||||||
Acquisition of/additions to vessels | 7 | ( |
( |
( | |||||||
Purchase of property, equipment and other fixed assets | 7 | ( |
( |
( | |||||||
Deposit for option to acquire vessels | 14 | ( | |||||||||
Net cash provided by investing activities | $ | $ | $ |
See notes to the consolidated financial statements
F- 6 |
NAVIOS MARITIME HOLDINGS INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars)
Notes | Year Ended December 31, 2022 |
Year Ended December 31, 2021 |
Year Ended December 31, 2020 | ||||||||
FINANCING ACTIVITIES: | |||||||||||
Tender offer - redemption of preferred stock | 19 | $ | ( |
$ | $ | ||||||
Repayment of loans payable to affiliate companies | 16 | ( |
( |
( | |||||||
Proceeds from loans payable to affiliate companies | 16 | ||||||||||
Proceeds from long-term loans, net of deferred financing costs | 11 | ||||||||||
Proceeds from issuance of senior notes, net of deferred financing costs | 11 | ||||||||||
Repayment of long-term debt and payment of principal | 11 | ( |
( |
( | |||||||
Repayment/repurchase of senior notes | 11 | ( |
( |
( | |||||||
Debt issuance costs | ( |
( |
( | ||||||||
Repayment of finance lease liability | ( |
||||||||||
Proceeds from sale of shares, net | 16 | | |||||||||
Dividends paid to noncontrolling shareholders | ( | ||||||||||
Acquisition of noncontrolling interest | 16 | ( |
( |
| |||||||
Net cash (used in)/provided by financing activities | $ | ( |
$ | ( |
$ | ||||||
(Decrease) /increase in cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash | ( |
||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash, beginning of year | |||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash, end of year | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION | |||||||||||
Cash paid for interest, net of capitalized interest | $ | |
$ | $ | |||||||
Cash paid for income taxes | $ | |
$ | $ | |||||||
Non-cash investing and financing activities | |||||||||||
Acquisition of/additions to vessels | 7 | $ | ( | ||||||||
Sale of vessels | 7 | $ | |||||||||
Proceeds from seller’s credit agreement for the construction of six liquid barges | 11 | $ | |||||||||
Transfers from other long-term assets assets | 7 | $ | $ | $ | |||||||
Proceeds from the Navios Logistics’ 2020 Fleet | $ | ||||||||||
Deposits for vessels, port terminals and other fixed assets | $ | $ | ( |
$ | |||||||
Promissory note for the acquisition of the noncontrolling interest | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||
Other long-term assets unpaid as of December 31, 2021 | $ | $ | ( |
$ | |||||||
Discontinued operations | |||||||||||
Net cash provided by/(used in) operating activities of discontinued operations | $ | $ | $ | ( | |||||||
Net cash provided by investing activities of discontinued operations | $ | $ | $ |
See notes to the consolidated financial statements
F- 7 |
NAVIOS MARITIME HOLDINGS INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars — except share data)
Number of Preferred Shares |
Preferred Stock |
Number of Common Shares |
Common Stock |
Additional Paid-in Capital |
Accumulated Deficit |
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income/(Loss) |
Total Navios Holdings’ Stockholders’ Equity/(Deficit) |
Noncontrolling Interest |
Total Stockholders’ Equity/(Deficit) | ||||||||||||||||||
Balance December 31, 2019 | $ | $ | $ | $ | ( |
$ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||||||||
Net loss | — | — | ( |
( |
|
( | |||||||||||||||||||||
Cancellation of shares (Note 17) | — | ( |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Conversion of convertible preferred stock to common stock (Note 17) | ( |
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock (Note 17) | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation expenses (Note 17) | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other adjustments in accumulated deficit | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends paid to noncontrolling shareholders | — | — | ( |
( | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance December 31, 2020 | $ | $ | $ | $ | ( |
$ | $ | ( |
$ | $ | ( | ||||||||||||||||
Net income | — | — | |
( |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Cancellation of shares (Note 17) | — | ( |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock (Note 17) | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sale of shares (Note 17) | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation expenses (Note 17) | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Acquisition of Noncontrolling Interest (Note 17) | — | — | ( |
( |
( |
( | |||||||||||||||||||||
Balance December 31, 2021 | $ | $ | $ | $ | ( |
$ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||||||||
Net income | — | — | ( |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tender offer- redemption of preferred stock (Note 17) | ( |
— | ( |
( |
( | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Cancellation of shares (Note 17) | — | ( |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation expenses (Note 17) | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance December 31, 2022 | $ | $ | $ | $ | ( |
$ | $ | $ | $ |
See notes to the consolidated financial statements
F- 8 |
NAVIOS MARITIME HOLDINGS INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars — except share data)
NOTE 1: DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS
Navios Maritime Holdings Inc. (“Navios Holdings” or the “Company”) (NYSE: NM) owns (i) a controlling equity stake in Navios South American Logistics Inc. (“Navios Logistics”), one of the largest infrastructure and logistics companies in the Hidrovia region of South America; and (ii) an interest in Navios Maritime Partners L.P. (“Navios Partners”) (NYSE:NMM), a United States publicly listed shipping company that owns and operates dry cargo and tanker vessels.
In September 2022, Navios Holdings completed the sale of its
Navios South American Logistics Inc.
Navios Logistics, a consolidated subsidiary of the Company, was incorporated under the laws of the Republic of the Marshall Islands on . Navios Logistics believes it is one of the largest infrastructure and logistics companies in the Hidrovia region river system, the main navigable river system in the region (the “Hidrovia region”), and on the cabotage trades along the south-eastern coast of South America. Navios Logistics serves its customers in the Hidrovia region through its three existing port storage and transfer facilities (the “Port Terminal Business”). The Port Terminal Business comprises its grain port terminal (the “Grain Port Terminal”), which supports agricultural and forest-related exports; its iron-ore port terminal (the “Iron Ore Port Terminal”), which supports mineral-related exports; and its liquid port terminal (the “Liquid Port Terminal”), with tank storage for refined petroleum products. The Grain Port Terminal and the Iron Ore Port Terminal (together, the “Dry Port Terminal”) are located in Nueva Palmira, Uruguay, and the Liquid Port Terminal is located in San Antonio, Paraguay. Navios Logistics complements these three port terminals with a diverse fleet of
Navios Partners
Navios Partners is an international owner and operator of dry cargo and tanker vessels and is engaged in the seaborne transportation services of a wide range of liquid and dry cargo commodities. Types of commodities Navios Partners transports include crude oil, refined petroleum, chemicals, iron ore, coal, grain, fertilizer and containers. Navios Partners charters its vessels under short-, medium-, and longer-term charters.
On March 31, 2021, Navios Partners acquired Navios Maritime Containers L.P. (“Navios Containers”) in a merger transaction (the “NMCI Merger”). Following the completion of the NMCI Merger Navios Holdings had no equity investment in Navios Containers. For more information about the NMCI Merger, see Note 9 “Investments in Affiliate Companies” to the consolidated financial statements.
On October 15, 2021, Navios Maritime Acquisition Corporation (“Navios Acquisition”) and Navios Partners consummated a merger transaction (the “NNA Merger”). Following the consummation of the NNA Merger, Navios Holdings had no equity investment in Navios Acquisition. For more information about the NNA Merger, see Note 9 “Investments in Affiliate Companies” to the consolidated financial statements.
As of both December 31, 2022 and 2021, Navios Holdings had a .
ownership interest in Navios Partners. Incentive distribution rights are held by a consolidated subsidiary of Navios HoldingsNavios Europe II
On February 18, 2015, Navios Holdings, Navios Acquisition and Navios Partners established Navios Europe (II) Inc. (“Navios Europe II”) and had economic interests of .
, and , respectively and voting interests in Navios Europe II of , and , respectively. Navios Europe II was engaged in the marine transportation industry through the ownership of seven dry bulk and seven containership vessels. On April 21, 2020, Navios Europe II and the lenders agreed to fully release the liabilities under the Junior Loan II for $ . The structure was liquidated in . For more information about the Company’s interests in Navios Europe II, see Note 16 “Transactions with Related Parties” to the consolidated financial statements
F- 9 |
NAVIOS MARITIME HOLDINGS INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars — except share data)
NOTE 2: SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
(a) Basis of presentation: The accompanying consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“
Based on internal forecasts and projections that take into account potential changes in the Company’s trading performance and other assets, management believes that the Company has adequate financial resources to continue in operation and meet its financial commitments, including but not limited to capital expenditures and debt service obligations, for a period of at least twelve months from the date of issuance of the consolidated financial statements. Although internal forecasts and projections are driven by market data and are subject to future volatility along with other factors outside the control of the Company, with the existence of alternative liquidity sources and management’s ability to utilize them if needed, management concludes that the Company has the ability to continue as a going concern as of the date of the issuance of the consolidated financial statements.
Following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 the United States, the European Union, the United Kingdom and other countries have announced sanctions against Russia, and may impose wider sanctions and take other actions in the future. To date, no apparent consequences have been identified on the Company’s business. Notwithstanding the foregoing, it is possible that these tensions might eventually have an adverse impact on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
(b) Principles of consolidation: The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Navios Holdings, a Republic of the Marshall Islands corporation, and both its majority and wholly-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in the consolidated statements.
The Company also consolidates entities that are determined to be variable interest entities (“VIE”) as defined in the accounting guidance, if the Company determines that it is the primary beneficiary of such entity. ASC 810-15-14 outlines the criteria for evaluating whether an entity is a VIE. A VIE is defined as a legal entity where either (i) equity interest holders as a group lack the characteristics of a controlling financial interest, including decision making ability; and an interest in the entity’s residual risks and reward; or (ii) the equity interest holders have not provided sufficient equity investment to permit the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support; or (iii) the voting rights of some investors are not proportional to their obligations to absorb the expected losses of the entity, their rights to receive the expected residual returns of the entity, or both; and substantially all of the entity’s activities either involve or are conducted on behalf of an investor that has disproportionately few voting rights.
Subsidiaries: Subsidiaries are entities in which the Company has an interest of more than one-half of the voting rights or otherwise has power to govern the financial and operating policies of the entity. The acquisition method of accounting is used to account for the acquisition of subsidiaries. The cost of an acquisition is measured as the fair value of the assets transferred, shares issued or liabilities undertaken at the date of acquisition. The excess of the cost of acquisition over the fair value of the net assets acquired and liabilities assumed is recorded as goodwill. All subsidiaries included in the consolidated financial statements are
owned, except for Navios Logistics for which is .
Discontinued Operations: Discontinued operations comprise the operations of a disposed component of an entity or a group of components of an entity if the disposal represents a strategic shift that has (or will have) a major effect on an entity’s operations and financial results. The Company determined that the sale of its
-vessel dry bulk fleet completed on , which resulted in a gain for the Company, represented a strategic shift in Company’s business. Consequently, the results of the previously reported Dry Bulk Vessel Operation, are reported as discontinued operations in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income/(loss) for all the periods presented. For additional information on the Company’s sale of the 36-vessel dry bulk fleet, see Note 3 “Discontinued operations” to the consolidated financial statements.
All references to the dry bulk vessels included in the following accounting policies relate to the periods prior to the completion of the Transaction.
F- 10 |
NAVIOS MARITIME HOLDINGS INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars — except share data)
Investments in Affiliate Companies: Affiliate companies are entities over which the Company holds between
Affiliate companies included in the financial statements accounted for under the equity method
In the consolidated financial statements of Navios Holdings, the following entities are included as affiliate companies and are accounted for under the equity method for such periods: (i) Navios Partners and its subsidiaries (ownership interest as of December 31, 2022 and 2021 was
); (ii) Navios Acquisition and its subsidiaries (ownership interest, through the Navios Partners’ NNA Merger in October 2021, was ); (iii) Navios Containers and its subsidiaries (ownership interest through Navios Partners’ NMCI Merger in March 2021 was ); and (iv) Navios Europe II and its subsidiaries (economic interest through liquidation in was ).Subsidiaries Included in the Consolidation:
Ownership | Country of | Statements of Operations | ||||||||||
Company Name |
Nature | Interest | Incorporation | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | ||||||
Navios Maritime Holdings Inc. | |
|||||||||||
Navios South American Logistics Inc. | ||||||||||||
Navios Corporation | ||||||||||||
Navios International Inc. | ||||||||||||
Navimax Corporation | ||||||||||||
Navios Handybulk Inc. | ||||||||||||
Hestia Shipping Ltd. | ||||||||||||
Anemos Maritime Holdings Inc. | ||||||||||||
NAV Holdings Limited | ||||||||||||
Kleimar N.V. | |
|||||||||||
Bulkinvest S.A. | ||||||||||||
Primavera Shipping Corporation | ||||||||||||
Ginger Services Co. | ||||||||||||
Aquis Marine Corp. | ||||||||||||
Astra Maritime Corporation | ||||||||||||
Achilles Shipping Corporation | ||||||||||||
Apollon Shipping Corporation | ||||||||||||
Herakles Shipping Corporation | ||||||||||||
Hios Shipping Corporation | ||||||||||||
Ionian Shipping Corporation |
F- 11 |
NAVIOS MARITIME HOLDINGS INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars — except share data)
Kypros Shipping Corporation | ||||||||||||
Meridian Shipping Enterprises Inc. | Vessel Owning Company |
|||||||||||
Mercator Shipping Corporation | ||||||||||||
Arc Shipping Corporation | ||||||||||||
Horizon Shipping Enterprises Corporation | ||||||||||||
Magellan Shipping Corporation | ||||||||||||
Aegean Shipping Corporation | ||||||||||||
Star Maritime Enterprises Corporation | ||||||||||||
Corsair Shipping Ltd. | ||||||||||||
Rowboat Marine Inc. | ||||||||||||
Rondine Management Corp. | ||||||||||||
Vernazza Shiptrade Inc. | ||||||||||||
Beaufiks Shipping Corporation | ||||||||||||
Nostos Shipmanagement Corp. | ||||||||||||
Portorosa Marine Corp. | ||||||||||||
Shikhar Ventures S.A. | ||||||||||||
Sizzling Ventures Inc. | ||||||||||||
Rheia Associates Co. | ||||||||||||
Taharqa Spirit Corp. | ||||||||||||
Rumer Holding Ltd. | ||||||||||||
Pharos Navigation S.A. | ||||||||||||
Pueblo Holdings Ltd. | ||||||||||||
Quena Shipmanagement Inc. | ||||||||||||
Aramis Navigation Inc. | ||||||||||||
White Narcissus Marine S.A. | ||||||||||||
Navios GP L.L.C. | ||||||||||||
Red Rose Shipping Corp. | ||||||||||||
Highbird Management Inc. | ||||||||||||
Ducale Marine Inc. | ||||||||||||
Vector Shipping Corporation | ||||||||||||
Faith Marine Ltd. | ||||||||||||
Navios Maritime Finance (US) Inc. | ||||||||||||
Navios Maritime Finance II (US) Inc. | ||||||||||||
Tulsi Shipmanagement Co. |
F- 12 |
NAVIOS MARITIME HOLDINGS INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars — except share data)
Cinthara Shipping Ltd. | ||||||||||||
Rawlin Services Company | ||||||||||||
Mauve International S.A. | ||||||||||||
Serenity Shipping Enterprises Inc. | ||||||||||||
Mandora Shipping Ltd | ||||||||||||
Solange Shipping Ltd. | ||||||||||||
Diesis Ship Management Ltd. | ||||||||||||
Navios Holdings Europe Finance Inc. | ||||||||||||
Navios Asia LLC | ||||||||||||
Iris Shipping Corporation | ||||||||||||
Jasmine Shipping Corporation | ||||||||||||
Emery Shipping Corporation | ||||||||||||
Lavender Shipping Corporation | ||||||||||||
Roselite Shipping Corporation | ||||||||||||
Smaltite Shipping Corporation | ||||||||||||
Motiva Trading Ltd. | ||||||||||||
Alpha Merit Corporation | ||||||||||||
Thalassa Marine S.A. | ||||||||||||
Asteroid Shipping S.A. | ||||||||||||
Cloud Atlas Marine S.A. | ||||||||||||
Heodor Shipping Inc. | ||||||||||||
Pacifico Navigation Corp. | ||||||||||||
Rider Shipmanagement Inc. | ||||||||||||
Talia Shiptrade S.A. | ||||||||||||
Moonstone Shipping Corporation | ||||||||||||
Opal Shipping Corporation | ||||||||||||
Grimaud Ventures S.A. | ||||||||||||
Anafi Shipping Corporation |
(c) Use of Estimates: The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the dates of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. On an ongoing basis, management evaluates the estimates and judgments. Estimates and judgements management evaluates relate to. among other things, uncompleted voyages, future drydock dates, the assessment of other-than-temporary impairment related to the carrying value of investments in affiliate companies, the selection of useful lives for tangible and intangible assets, expected future cash flows from long-lived assets and operating lease assets to support impairment tests, impairment test for goodwill, allowance for credit losses necessary for accounts receivables and demurrages, provisions for legal disputes, pension benefits, contingencies and guarantees. Management bases its estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various other factors that they believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources.
F- 13 |
NAVIOS MARITIME HOLDINGS INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars — except share data)
(d) Cash and Cash Equivalents: Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash on hand, deposits held on call with banks, and other short-term liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less.
(e) Restricted Cash: As of both December 31, 2022 and 2021, within restricted cash are included amounts held as security in the form of letters of guarantee or letters of credit totaling $
(e) Insurance Claims: Insurance claims at each balance sheet date consist of claims submitted and/or claims in the process of compilation or submission (claims pending). They are recorded on an accrual basis and represent the claimable expenses, net of applicable deductibles, incurred through December 31 of each reporting period, which are probable to be recovered from insurance companies. Any remaining costs to complete the claims are included in accrued liabilities. The classification of insurance claims into current and non-current assets is based on management’s expectations as to their collection dates.
(g) Inventories: Inventories, which are comprised of lubricants, bunkers (when applicable) and stock provisions on board of the vessels, as well as petroleum products held by Navios Logistics, are stated at the lower of cost or net realizable value. Net realizable value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business, less estimated costs of completion and the estimated costs necessary to make the sale. Cost is calculated using the first in first out method.
(h) Dry Bulk Vessels, Port Terminals, Tanker Vessels, Barges, Pushboats and Other Fixed Assets, net: Dry bulk vessels, port terminals, tanker vessels, barges, pushboats and other fixed assets acquired as parts of business combinations are recorded at fair value on the date of acquisition, and if acquired as an asset acquisition, are recorded at cost (including transaction costs). Vessels constructed by the company would be stated at historical cost, which consists of the contract price, capitalized interest and any material expenses incurred upon acquisition (improvements and delivery expenses). Subsequent expenditures for ballast water treatment system, major improvements and upgrades are capitalized, provided they appreciably extend the life, increase the earnings capability or improve the efficiency or safety of the vessels. The cost and related accumulated depreciation of assets retired or sold are removed from the accounts at the time of sale or retirement and any gain or loss is included in the accompanying consolidated statements of comprehensive income/(loss).
Expenditures for routine maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred.
Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the useful life of the vessels, port terminals, tanker vessels, barges, pushboats and other fixed assets, after considering the estimated residual value.
Annual depreciation rates used, which approximate the useful life of the assets are:
Dry bulk vessels | |
Port terminals | |
Tanker vessels, barges and pushboats | |
Furniture, fixtures and equipment | |
Computer equipment and software | |
Leasehold improvements |
Management estimated the residual values of the Company’s dry bulk vessels based on a scrap value cost of steel times the weight of the ship noted in lightweight tons (“LWT”). Residual values were periodically reviewed and revised to recognize changes in conditions, new regulations or for other reasons. Revisions of residual values affect the depreciable amount of the vessels and the depreciation expense in the period of the revision and future periods. Management estimated the residual values of the Company’s vessels based on a scrap rate of $
F- 14 |
NAVIOS MARITIME HOLDINGS INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars — except share data)
Management estimated the useful life of its dry bulk vessels to be
(i) Deposits for Vessels, Port Terminals and Other Fixed Assets: This represents amounts paid by the Company in accordance with the terms of the purchase agreements for the construction of vessels, port terminals and other long-lived fixed assets. Deposits for vessels, port terminals and other fixed assets also include pre-delivery expenses. Pre-delivery expenses represent any direct costs to bring the asset to the location and condition necessary for it to be capable of operating in the manner intended by management. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, a total of $
(j) Assets Held for Sale: The Company’s policy is to dispose of vessels and other fixed assets when suitable opportunities occur and not necessarily to keep them until the end of their useful life. The Company classifies assets and disposal groups as being held for sale when the following criteria are met: management has committed to a plan to sell the asset (disposal group); the asset (disposal group) is available for immediate sale in its present condition; an active program to locate a buyer and other actions required to complete the plan to sell the asset (disposal group) have been initiated; the sale of the asset (disposal group) is probable, and transfer of the asset (disposal group) is expected to qualify for recognition as a completed sale within one year; the asset (disposal group) is being actively marketed for sale at a price that is reasonable in relation to its current fair value; and actions required to complete the plan indicate that it is unlikely that significant changes to the plan will be made or that the plan will be withdrawn. Long-lived assets or disposal groups classified as held for sale are measured at the lower of their carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell. These assets are not depreciated once they meet the criteria to be held for sale. No assets were classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2022 and 2021.
(k) Impairment of Long Lived Assets: Vessels, other fixed assets and other long-lived assets held and used by the Company are reviewed periodically for potential impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of a particular asset may not be fully recoverable. Navios Holdings’ management evaluates the carrying amounts and periods over which long-lived assets are depreciated to determine if events or changes in circumstances have occurred that would require modification to their carrying values or useful lives. Measurement of the impairment loss is determined as the difference between the carrying value and the fair value.
Navios Holdings
Navios Holdings determined the fair value of its assets on the basis of management estimates and assumptions by making use of available market data and taking into consideration third party valuations performed on an individual vessel basis. In evaluating useful lives and carrying values of long-lived assets, certain indicators of potential impairment were reviewed, such as undiscounted projected operating cash flows, vessel sales and purchases, business plans and overall market conditions.
Undiscounted projected net operating cash flows were determined for each asset group and compared to the carrying value of the vessel, the unamortized portion of deferred drydock and special survey costs, the unamortized portion of ballast water treatment system and the unamortized portion of other capitalized items, if any related to the vessel or the carrying value of deposits for newbuildings. The loss recognized either on impairment (or on disposition) would reflect the excess of carrying value over fair value (selling price) for the vessel asset group.
Where the undiscounted projected net operating cash flows for each asset group did not exceed the carrying value of the operating lease asset and the carrying value of deposits for the option to acquire a vessel including expenses and interest, management proceeded to perform step two of the impairment assessment. In step two of the impairment assessment, the Company determined the fair value of its vessels through a combination of a discounted cash flow analysis utilizing market participant assumptions from available market data and third-party valuations performed on an individual vessel basis.
F- 15 |
NAVIOS MARITIME HOLDINGS INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars — except share data)
Pursuant to the Transaction during the third quarter of 2022, the Company completed the sale of its owned vessels to Navios Partners. For further information see Note 3 “Discontinued operations” in the consolidated financial statements. No impairment losses were recognized on any of Navios Holdings vessels during the year ended December 31, 2022.
As of December 31, 2021, the Company considered various indicators, including but not limited to the market price of its long-lived assets, its contracted revenues and cash flows and the economic outlook, and concluded for the Dry Bulk Vessel Operations that no events and circumstances occurred, which could trigger the existence of potential impairment of the Company’s vessels. As a result, no step one of impairment assessment was performed as of December 31, 2021.
During the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2020, management concluded that events occurred, and circumstances had changed, which indicated that potential impairment of the Company’s long-lived assets could exist. These indicators included continued volatility in the spot market, and the related impact of the current dry bulk sector on management’s expectation for future revenues. As a result, an impairment assessment of long-lived assets (step one) was performed.
The Company determined undiscounted projected net operating cash flows for each vessel and compared it to the vessel’s carrying value together with the carrying value of deferred drydock and special survey costs, ballast water treatment system costs and other capitalized items, if any, related to the vessel. The significant factors and assumptions used in the undiscounted projected net operating cash flow analysis included: determining the projected net operating cash flows by considering the charter revenues from existing time charters for the fixed fleet days (the Company’s remaining charter agreement rates) and an estimated daily time charter equivalent for the unfixed days (based on a combination of one-year average historical time charter rates and 10-year average historical one-year time charter rates) over the remaining economic life of each vessel, net of brokerage and address commissions excluding days of scheduled off-hires, management fees for vessel operating expenses fixed until 2021 and thereafter assuming an annual increase of
every second year and a utilization rate of based on the fleet’s historical performance.As of December 31, 2020, our assessment concluded that step two of the impairment analysis was required for two of our dry-bulk vessels held and used, as the undiscounted projected net operating cash flows did not exceed the carrying value for such vessels. As a result, the Company recorded an impairment loss of $Net income/(loss) from discontinued operations” in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income/(loss).
for the two dry-bulk vessels, representing the difference between the fair value and the vessels’ carrying value together with the carrying value of deferred drydock and special survey costs, ballast water treatment system costs and other capitalized items, if any, related to these vessels. The impairment is presented under the caption “Navios Logistics
Vessels, other fixed assets and other long-lived assets held and used by Navios Logistics are reviewed periodically for potential impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of a particular asset may not be fully recoverable. In accordance with accounting for long-lived assets, management determines projected undiscounted cash flows for each asset group and compares it to its carrying amount. In the event that projected undiscounted cash flows for an asset group is less than its carrying amount, then management reviews fair values and compares them to the asset group’s carrying amount. In the event that impairment occurs, an impairment charge is recognized by comparing the asset group’s carrying amount to its fair value. For the purposes of assessing impairment, long lived-assets are grouped at the lowest levels for which there are separately identifiable cash flows.
During the fourth quarter of 2022, Navios Logistics completed the sale of vessel Malva H for a sale price of $
As of December 31, 2021, management concluded that certain events and circumstances had changed, indicating a potential impairment of two of the Logistics Business’s tanker vessels. These events and circumstances included the extended period in which its tanker vessels operating in the cabotage business have been without a long-term time charter contract. The extended delay is the result of the status of the current tanker market and the vessels’ capacity. Vessels’ capacity appears to be limited to trading in the markets of Argentina and Uruguay.
F- 16 |
NAVIOS MARITIME HOLDINGS INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars — except share data)
Navios Logistics recorded an impairment loss of $for two of its tanker vessels operating in its cabotage business, representing the difference between the carrying value of the vessels including the carrying value of deferred drydock and special survey costs related to these vessels, and their respective fair values. Navios Logistics determined the fair value of its assets on the basis of evaluations provided by third-party independent shipbrokers and compared them to the carrying value of the vessels including the unamortized portion of deferred drydock and special survey costs. The impairment loss recognized reflected the excess of carrying value over fair value for the vessel asset group. The impairment loss is included under the caption “Impairment loss/ loss on sale of vessels, net” in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income/(loss). See Note 7 “Vessels, Port Terminals and Other Fixed Assets, Net” in the consolidated financial statements.
(l) Deferred Drydock and Special Survey Costs: The Company’s vessels, barges and pushboats are subject to regularly scheduled drydocking and special surveys which are carried out every
Costs capitalized as part of the drydocking or special survey consist principally of the actual costs incurred at the yard, and expenses relating to spare parts, paints, lubricants and services incurred solely during the drydocking or special survey period. For each of the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, the amortization of deferred drydock and special survey costs from continuing operations was $
(m) Deferred Financing Costs: Deferred financing costs include fees, commissions and legal expenses associated with obtaining or modifying loan facilities. Deferred financing costs are presented as a deduction from the corresponding liability. These costs are amortized over the life of the related debt using the effective interest rate method, and are included in interest expense. Amortization and write-off of deferred financing costs from continuing operations for each of the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020 were $
F- 17 |
NAVIOS MARITIME HOLDINGS INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars — except share data)
(n) Goodwill and Other Intangibles
(i) Goodwill: Goodwill is tested for impairment at the reporting unit level at least annually and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value of goodwill may not be recoverable.
Navios Holdings evaluated impairment of goodwill using a single step process following the adoption of ASU 2017-04, “Intangibles-Goodwill and Other (Topic 350)” as of January 1, 2020. The aggregate fair value of the reporting unit is compared to its carrying amount, including goodwill. Navios Holdings determined the fair value of the reporting unit based on a combination of the income approach (i.e. discounted cash flows) and market approach (i.e. comparative market multiples) and believes that the combination of these two approaches is the best indicator of fair value for its individual reporting units. Goodwill impairment loss was measured as the amount by which a reporting unit’s carrying amount exceeds its fair value, not to exceed the carrying amount of goodwill.
As of December 31, 2022, goodwill of $
As of December 31, 2021, the Company performed the impairment test for the Dry Bulk Vessel Operations reporting unit, which,was allocated goodwill of $
The fair value of the Dry Bulk Vessel Operations reporting unit was estimated using a combination of income and market approaches. For the income approach, the expected present value of future cash flows used judgments and assumptions that management believes were appropriate in the circumstances. The significant factors and assumptions the Company used in its discounted cash flow analysis included: EBITDA, the discount rate used to calculate the present value of future cash flows and future capital expenditures. EBITDA assumptions included revenue assumptions, general and administrative expense growth assumptions and direct vessel expense growth assumptions. The future cash flows were determined by considering the charter revenues from existing time charters for the fixed fleet days (the Company’s remaining charter agreement rates) and an estimated daily time charter equivalent for the unfixed days (based on a combination of one-year average historical time charter rates and the 10-year average of historical one-year time-charter rates). The Company believes this approach to be objective for forecasting charter rates over an extended time period for long-lived assets and consistent with the cyclicality of the industry. In addition, a weighted average cost of capital (“WACC”) was used to discount future estimated cash flows to their present values. The WACC was based on externally observable data considering market participants’ and the Company’s cost of equity and debt, optimal capital structure and risk factors specific to the Company. The market approach estimated the fair value of the Company’s business based on comparable publicly-traded companies in its industry. In assessing the fair value, the Company utilized the results of the valuations and considered the range of fair values determined under all methods which indicated that the fair value exceeded the carrying amount.
As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the Company performed the impairment test for the Logistics Business, which is allocated goodwill of $
F- 18 |
NAVIOS MARITIME HOLDINGS INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars — except share data)
(ii) Intangibles Other Than Goodwill: Consolidated intangible assets, consist of Navios Holding’s trade name of $
The Company reviews its other intangibles such as trade name, customer relationships and port terminal operating rights periodically for potential impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be fully recoverable. Intangibles other than goodwill would be considered impaired if their carrying value is not recovered from the future undiscounted cash flows associated with the asset (step one). Measurement of the impairment loss is determined as the difference between the carrying amount and the fair value of the intangible asset. The Company determines the fair value of its intangible assets based on management estimates and assumptions by making use of available market data. In evaluating carrying values of intangible assets, certain indicators of potential impairment are reviewed, such as undiscounted projected operating cash flows, business plans and overall market conditions.
As of December 31, 2022, the Company concluded that no events and circumstances occurred that could trigger the existence of potential impairment of the Navios Logistics’ other intangible assets including port terminal operating rights and customer relationships. As a result, step one of impairment assessment was not required as of December 31, 2022.
As of December 31, 2021, the Company concluded that no events and circumstances occurred that could trigger the existence of potential impairment of the Navios Holdings trade name, and the Navios Logistics’ other intangible assets, including port terminal operating rights and customer relationships. As a result, step one of impairment assessment was not required as of December 31, 2021.
During the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2020, management concluded that certain events occurred and circumstances had changed indicating a potential impairment of the Navios Holdings trade name. These changes in events and circumstances included continued volatility in the spot market, and the impact of the current dry bulk sector on management’s expectation for future revenues. As a result, an impairment assessment for trade name (step one) was performed.
The significant factors and assumptions the Company used in the undiscounted cash flow analysis of its trade name included: revenue assumptions, specifically the future cash flows were determined by considering the charter revenues of the Dry Bulk Vessel Operations from existing time charters for the fixed fleet days (the Company’s remaining charter agreement rates) and an estimated daily time charter equivalent for the unfixed days (based on a combination of one-year average historical time charter rates and the 10-year average historical one-year time charter rates) and the respective “relief from royalty” rate applied to the future cash flows of the Dry Bulk Vessel Operations.
The weighted average amortization periods for intangibles are:
Intangible assets |
Years | |
Trade name | ||
Port terminal operating rights | ||
Customer relationships |
(o) Foreign Currency Translation: The Company’s functional and reporting currency is the U.S. dollar. The Company engages in worldwide commerce with a variety of entities. Although its operations may expose it to certain levels of foreign currency risk, its transactions are predominantly U.S. dollar denominated. The Company’s subsidiaries in Uruguay, Argentina, Brazil and Paraguay transact a nominal amount of their operations in Uruguayan pesos, Argentinean pesos, Brazilian reales and Paraguayan guaranies, whereas the Company’s wholly-owned vessel subsidiaries and the vessel management subsidiaries transact nominal operations in Euros; however, all of the subsidiaries’ primary cash flows are U.S.-dollar denominated. The financial statements of the foreign operations are translated using the exchange rate at the balance sheet date except for property and equipment and equity, which are translated at historical rates. Transactions in currencies other than the functional currency are translated at the exchange rate in effect at the date of each transaction. Differences in exchange rates during the period between the date a transaction denominated in a foreign currency is consummated and the date on which it is either settled or translated, are recognized in the statements of comprehensive income/(loss). The foreign currency gains/(losses) recognized under the captions “Other income” and “Other expense”, respectively, in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income/(loss) for each of the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, were $
F- 19 |
NAVIOS MARITIME HOLDINGS INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars — except share data)
(p) Provisions: In the ordinary course of its business, the Company, is subject to various claims, suits and complaints. Management, in consultation with internal and external advisers, will provide for a contingent loss in the financial statements if the contingency had occurred at the date of the financial statements, the likelihood of loss was probable, and the loss amount can be reasonably estimated. If the Company has determined that the reasonable estimate of the loss is a range and there is no best estimate within the range, the Company will provide for the lower amount within the range. For further information on estimating contingent losses, see Note 14 “Commitments and Contingencies” in the consolidated financial statements.
The Company participates in Protection and Indemnity (“P&I”) insurance plans provided by mutual insurance associations known as P&I clubs. Under the terms of these plans, participants may be required to pay additional premiums (supplementary calls) to fund operating deficits incurred by the clubs (“back calls”). Obligations for back calls are accrued annually based on information provided by the P&I clubs.
Provision for losses subject to claims was provided for in the period in which estimated losses on vessels under time charter losses were determined. As of both December 31, 2022 and 2021, the balance for this provision was $
(q) Segment Reporting: Operating segments, as defined, indicate components of the Company for which separate financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. Based on the Company’s methods of internal reporting and management structure, the Company through September 8, 2022 had
(r) Revenue and Expense Recognition:
Revenue Recognition: Revenue is recognized when (or as) the Company transfers promised goods or services to its customers in amounts that reflect the consideration to which the company expects to be entitled to in exchange for those goods or services, which occurs when (or as) the Company satisfies its contractual obligations and transfers control of the promised goods or services to its customers. In determining the appropriate amount of revenue to be recognized as it fulfills its obligations under its agreements, the Company performs the following steps: (i) identification of the promised goods or services in the contract; (ii) determination of whether the promised goods or services are performance obligations, including whether they are distinct in the context of the contract; (iii) measurement of the transaction price, including the constraint on variable consideration; (iv) allocation of the transaction price to the performance obligations based on estimated selling prices; and (v) recognition of revenue when (or as) the Company satisfies each performance obligation.
Voyage revenues for the transportation of cargo are recognized ratably over the estimated relative transit time of each voyage. A voyage is deemed to commence when a vessel arrives at the loading port, as applicable under the contract, and is deemed to end upon the completion of the discharge of the current cargo. Under a voyage charter, a vessel is provided for the transportation of specific goods between specific ports in return for payment of an agreed upon freight per ton of cargo.
Revenues are recorded net of address commissions. Address commissions represent a discount provided directly to the charterers based on a fixed percentage of the agreed upon charter rate. Since address commissions represent a discount (sales incentive) on services rendered by the Company and no identifiable benefit is received in exchange for the consideration provided to the charterer, these commissions are presented as a reduction of revenue.
Revenue from contracts of affreightment (“COA”)/voyage contracts relating to our barges are recognized ratably over the estimated relative transit time of each voyage. A voyage is deemed to commence upon the barge’s arrival at the loading port, as applicable under the contract, and is deemed to end upon the completion of discharge under the current voyage. The percentage of transit time is based on the number of days traveled as of the balance sheet date divided by the number of total days expected for the voyage. The position of the barge at the balance sheet date is determined by the days traveled as of the balance sheet date over the total voyage of the pushboat having the barge in tow. Revenue arising from contracts that provide our customers with continuous access to convoy capacity is recognized ratably over the period of the contracts. Demurrage income represents payments made by the charterer to the vessel owner when loading or discharging time exceeds the stipulated time in the voyage charter and is recognized as it is earned.
F- 20 |
NAVIOS MARITIME HOLDINGS INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars — except share data)
The Company recognizes revenue ratably from the vessel’s/barge’s arrival at the loading port, as set forth in the applicable contract, to when the charterer’s cargo is discharged as well as defer costs that meet the definition of “costs to fulfill a contract” and relate directly to the contract.
Revenues from time-chartering and bareboat chartering of vessels and barges are accounted for as operating leases and are thus recognized on a straight-line basis as the average revenue over the rental periods of such charter agreements as service is performed. However, for loss generating time charters, the loss is recognized in the period during which the loss is generated. A time-charter involves placing a vessel or barge at the charterer’s disposal for a period of time during which the charterer uses the vessel in return for the payment of a specified daily hire rate. Charters for periods of less than three months are referred to as spot-charters. Charters for periods of three months to a year are generally referred to as medium-term charters. All other charters are considered long-term. For time-charters, the owner of the vessel typically pays the vessel’s operating costs, such as crews, maintenance and insurance.
For vessels operating in pooling arrangements, the Company earns a portion of total revenues generated by the pool, net of expenses incurred by the pool. The amount allocated to each pool participant vessel, including the Company’s vessels, is determined in accordance with an agreed-upon formula, which is determined by margins awarded to each vessel in the pool based on the vessel’s age, design and other performance characteristics. Revenue under pooling arrangements is accounted for on the accrual basis and is recognized in the period in which the variability is resolved. The allocation of such net revenue may be subject to future adjustments by the pool; however, such changes are not expected to be material.
Revenues from dry port terminal operations consist of an agreed flat fee per ton and cover the services performed to unload barges (or trucks), transfer the product into silos or the stockpiles for temporary storage, and to load the ocean-going vessels. Revenues are recognized upon completion of loading the ocean-going vessels. Revenue arising from contracts that provide our customers with continuous access to port terminal storage and transshipment capacity is recognized ratably over the period of the contracts. Additionally, fees are charged for vessel dockage and for storage time in excess of contractually specified terms. Dockage revenues are recognized ratably up to completion of loading as the performance obligation is met evenly over the loading period. Storage fees are assessed and recognized at the point when the product remains in the silo storage beyond the contractually agreed-upon term. Storage fee revenue is recognized ratably over the storage period and ends when the product is loaded onto the ocean-going vessel.
Revenues from liquid port terminal consist mainly of sales of petroleum products in the Paraguayan market and revenues from liquid port operations. Revenues from liquid port terminal operations consist of an agreed flat fee per cubic meter or a fixed rate over a specific period to cover the services performed to unload barges, transfer the products into the tanks for temporary storage and then loading the trucks. Revenues that consist of an agreed flat fee per cubic meter are recognized upon completion of loading the trucks. Revenues from liquid port terminal operations that consist of a fixed rate over a specific period are recognized ratably over the storage period as the performance obligation is met evenly over time, ending when the product is loaded onto the trucks.
Additionally, revenues consist of an agreed flat fee per cubic meter to cover the services performed to unload barges, transfer the products into the tanks for temporary storage, and to load the trucks. Revenues are recognized upon completion of loading the trucks. Additionally, fees are charged for storage time in excess of contractually specified terms. Storage fee revenue is recognized ratably over the storage period and ends when the product is loaded onto the trucks.
Expenses related to our revenue-generating contracts are recognized as incurred.
The following tables reflect the revenue earned per category for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020:
Year Ended December 31, 2022 | Year Ended December 31, 2021 |
Year Ended December 31, 2020 | ||||||
COA/Voyage revenue | $ | $ | $ | |||||
Time chartering revenue | ||||||||
Dry Port terminal revenue | ||||||||
Storage fees (dry port) revenue | ||||||||
Dockage revenue | ||||||||
Sale of products revenue | ||||||||
Liquid port terminal revenue | ||||||||
Other | ||||||||
Total | $ | $ | $ |
F- 21 |
NAVIOS MARITIME HOLDINGS INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars — except share data)
General and administrative expenses: The general and administrative expenses incurred on behalf of affiliate companies were determined based on a combination of actual expenses incurred on behalf of the affiliate companies as well as a reasonable allocation of expenses that are not affiliate companies specific but incurred on behalf of all affiliate companies.
Pursuant to an administrative services agreement dated August 29, 2019 (the “Administrative Services Agreement”), these services are provided by NSM. The Manager is reimbursed for reasonable costs and expenses incurred in connection with the provision of these services. The term of this agreement is for an initial period of five years with an automatic extension for a period of five years thereafter unless a notice of termination is received by either party. The Administrative Services Agreement also provides that the Company pay a termination fee, equal to the fees charged for the full calendar year preceding the termination date, by Navios Holdings in the event the Administrative Services Agreement is terminated on or before August 29, 2024, upon the occurrence of certain events. For information on the Administrative Services Agreement, see Note 16 “Transactions with Related Parties” in the consolidated financial statements.
Deferred Income and Cash Received in Advance: Deferred voyage revenue primarily relates to cash received from charterers prior to it being earned. These amounts are recognized as revenue over the voyage or charter period.
Time Charter, Voyage and Logistics Business Expenses: Time charter, voyage and logistics business expenses comprise all expenses related to each particular voyage, including time charter hire paid and voyage freight paid, bunkers, port charges, canal tolls, cargo handling, agency fees and brokerage commissions. Also included in time charter, voyage and logistics business expenses are charterers’ liability insurances, allowance for credit losses on time charters and voyages in progress at year-end, direct port terminal expenses and other miscellaneous expenses. In the transition to ASC 842, the operating lease assets were adjusted for the carrying amount of the liability regarding the allowance for credit losses on time charters and voyages in progress on that date.
Direct Vessel Expenses: Direct vessel expenses consisted of all expenses relating to the operation of vessels, including crewing, repairs and maintenance, insurance, stores and lubricants and miscellaneous expenses such as communications and amortization of drydocking and special survey costs, net of related party management fees for vessel operating expenses. Prior to the Transaction, these services are provided to Navios Holdings’ vessels by NSM, pursuant to a management agreement dated August 29, 2019 (the “Management Agreement”) (see also Note 16 “Transactions with Related Parties” to the consolidated financial statements). The ship management services fees provided by the Manager was a fixed rate of $
Prepaid Voyage Costs: Prepaid voyage costs relate to cash paid in advance for expenses associated with voyages. These amounts are recognized as expenses over the voyage or charter period presented under the caption “Prepaid and other current assets”.
(s) Employee benefits:
Stock-Based Compensation: In December 2022, December 2021 and December 2020, the Company authorized the grant of restricted common stock. In December 2017, the Company authorized the grant of restricted common stock and restricted stock units. These awards of restricted share units, share appreciation rights, restricted common stock, restricted stock units and stock options are based on service conditions only and vest over three and four years. See also Note 13 “Employee Benefit Plans” to the consolidated financial statements.
The fair value of restricted share units, restricted stock and restricted stock units is determined by reference to the quoted stock price on the date of grant. Compensation expense, net of estimated forfeitures, is recognized based on a graded expense model over the vesting period.
F- 22 |
NAVIOS MARITIME HOLDINGS INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars — except share data)
(t) Financial Instruments: Financial instruments carried on the balance sheet include cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, account receivables and payables, other current assets and other liabilities, long-term debt, capital leases and available-for-sale securities. The particular recognition methods applicable to each class of financial instrument are disclosed in the applicable significant policy description of each item, or included below as applicable.
Financial Risk Management: The Company’s activities expose it to a variety of financial risks including fluctuations in future freight rates, time charter hire rates, fuel prices and credit and interest rates risk. Risk management is carried out under policies approved by executive management. Guidelines are established for overall risk management, as well as specific areas of operations.
Credit Risk: The Company closely monitors its exposure to customers and counterparties for credit risk. Navios Holdings, through its access to NSM policies and personnel, has policies designed to limit trading to customers and counterparties with an appropriate credit history. Credit risk with respect to accounts receivable is reduced by the Company by rendering services to established international operators. Management believes that no additional credit risk beyond amounts provided for collection losses is inherent in the Company’s trade receivables.
Liquidity Risk: Prudent liquidity risk management ivolves maintaining sufficient cash and marketable securities, the availability of funding through an adequate amount of committed credit facilities and the ability to close out market positions. The Company monitors cash balances appropriately to meet working capital needs.
Foreign Exchange Risk: Foreign currency transactions are converted into the measurement currency at rates prevailing on the dates of the relevant transactions. Foreign exchange gains and losses resulting from the settlement of such transactions and from the translation of monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are recognized in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income/(loss) under the captions “Other income” and/or “Other expnese” as applicable.
(v) Income Taxes: The Company is a Republic of the Marshall Islands corporation. Pursuant to various treaties and the United States Internal Revenue Code, the Company believes that substantially all its operations are exempt from income taxes in the Republic of the Marshall Islands and the United States of America. The tax expense reflected in the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020 was mainly attributable to its subsidiaries in South America, which are subject to the Argentinean and Paraguayan income tax regimes.
The asset and liability method is used to account for future income taxes. Under this method, future income tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the estimated future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and the tax bases of assets and liabilities. Future income tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on future income tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. A deferred tax asset is recognized for temporary differences that will result in deductible amounts in future years. A valuation allowance is recognized if, based on the weight of available evidence, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax asset will not be realized.
As a result of the Law 27,630, voted by the Argentinean Parliament in June 2021, income tax rates and scales were modified. Scales are updated annually as per inflation. Income tax liabilities of the Argentinean subsidiaries for the current period is measured at the amount expected to be paid to the taxation authorities using a tax rate of 35% on any taxable profit above 76 million Argentinean pesos or $429, 30% on any taxable profit between 8 million Argentinean pesos or $42 and 76 million Argentinean pesos or $429, and 25% on any taxable profit below 8 million Argentinean pesos or $42. The enacted Law 27,630 replaced the income tax rates and scales enacted by the Law 27,541, voted by the Parliament on December 23, 2019, which had made changes to the income tax law in Argentina. The Law 27,541, had modified the rates for income taxes applicable for the fiscal years beginning on January 1, 2020 and 2021. In measuring its income tax assets and liabilities, the Company used the rate that is expected to be enacted at the time of the reversal of the asset or liability in the calculation of the deferred tax for the items related to Argentina. An income tax rate of
F- 23 |
NAVIOS MARITIME HOLDINGS INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars — except share data)
(w) Dividends: Dividends are recorded in the Company’s financial statements in the period in which they are declared. Navios Holdings paid $
(x) Guarantees: A liability for the fair value of an obligation undertaken in issuing the guarantee is recognized. The recognition of fair value is not required for certain guarantees such as the parent’s guarantee of a subsidiary’s debt to a third party or guarantees on product warranties. For those guarantees excluded from the above guidance requiring the fair value recognition provision of the liability, financial statement disclosures of their terms are made.
On November 15, 2012, the Company agreed to provide Navios Partners with guarantees against counterparty default on certain existing charters (see also Note 16 “Transactions with Related Parties” to the consolidated financial statements).
(y) Leases: Leases where the Company acts as the lessor are classified as either operating or sales-type / direct financing leases. In cases of lease agreements where the Company acts as the lessor under an operating lease, the Company keeps the underlying asset on the consolidated balance sheets and continues to depreciate the assets over its useful life. In cases of lease agreements where the Company acts as the lessor under a sales-type / direct financing lease, the Company derecognizes the underlying asset and records a gross investment in the lease.
The difference between the gross investment in the lease and the sum of the present values of the two components of the gross investment is recorded as unearned income which is amortized to income over the lease term as finance lease interest income to produce a constant periodic rate of return on the net investment in the lease.
For charters classified as operating leases where Navios Holdings is deemed the lessor, refer to Note 2(r) “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies -Revenue and Expense Recognition” to the consolidated financial statements. The Company acts as a lessor under operating leases in connection with all of its charter out arrangements.
In cases of lease agreements where the Company acts as lessee, the Company recognizes an operating lease asset and a corresponding lease liability on the consolidated balance sheet. For charters classified as operating leases where Navios Holdings is or is deemed the lessee, the expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the rental periods of such charter agreements. The expense is included under the caption “Time charter, voyage and logistics business expenses”.
In cases of sale and leaseback agreements, if the transfer of the asset to the lessor does not qualify as a sale, then the agreement constitutes a failed sale and leaseback and is accounted for as a financial liability. For a sale to have occurred, the control of the asset would need to be transferred to the lessor, and the lessor would need to obtain substantially all the benefits from the use of the asset.
Impairment of operating lease assets: Operating lease assets used by Navios Holdings were reviewed periodically for potential impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be fully recoverable. Measurement of the impairment loss was determined as the difference between the carrying value and the fair value of the asset group. Navios Holdings determined the fair value of its assets based on management estimates and assumptions by making use of available market data. In evaluating carrying values of operating lease assets, certain indicators of potential impairment were reviewed, such as undiscounted projected operating cash flows, business plans and overall market conditions.
F- 24 |
NAVIOS MARITIME HOLDINGS INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars — except share data)
Undiscounted projected net operating cash flows were determined for each asset group and compared to the carrying value of the operating lease asset and the carrying value of deposits for the option to acquire a vessel including expenses and interest (asset group). If the step two of the impairment analysis was required, the analysis included the use of discounted cash flows which includes various assumptions, including the Company’s WACC.
If management determined that step two of the impairment analysis was required for any of our asset groups, a discounted cash flow analysis using the Company’s WACC was performed. The WACC was based on externally observable data considering market participants’ and the Company’s cost of equity and debt, optimal capital structure and risk factors specific to the Company. Where the undiscounted projected net operating cash flows for each asset group did not exceed the carrying value of the operating lease asset and the carrying value of deposits for the option to acquire a vessel including expenses and interest, management proceeded to perform step two of the impairment assessment.
Pursuant to the Transaction during the third quarter of 2022, the Company completed the sale of its charter-in and bareboat-in vessels to Navios Partners. For further information see Note 3 “Discontinued operations” in the consolidated financial statements.
As of December 31, 2021, the Company concluded that no events or circumstances occurred that would trigger the existence of potential impairment of its operating lease assets. As a result, no step-one impairment assessment was performed as of December 31, 2021.
During the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2020, management concluded that events occurred, and certain circumstances had changed, such that potential impairment of the Company’s operating lease assets could exist. These events and circumstances included continued volatility in the spot market, the impact of such volatility on the current dry bulk sector, and the resulting effect on management’s expectation for future revenues. As a result, an impairment assessment of operating lease assets (step one) was performed. The Company determined undiscounted projected net operating cash flows for each charter-in and bareboat-in vessel and compared those cash flows to each operating lease asset’s carrying value together with the carrying value of deposits for the option to acquire a vessel including expenses and interest.
Factors and assumptions used in the undiscounted projected net operating cash flow analysis included a determination of the projected net operating cash flows by considering the charter revenues from existing time charters for the fixed-fleet days (the Company’s remaining charter agreement rates), an estimated daily time charter equivalent for the unfixed days (based on three-year average historical time charter rates) over the remaining lease term, net of brokerage and address commissions excluding days of scheduled off-hires (for the bareboat-in vessels), and management fees for vessel operating expenses in accordance with the terms of the Management Agreement. The determination process assumed an annual increase of
As of December 31, 2020, our assessment concluded that step two of the impairment analysis was required for two asset groups, which involved a discounted cash flow analysis using the Company’s WACC. As a result, the Company recorded an impairment loss of $
(z) Treasury Stock: Treasury stock is accounted for using the cost method. Excess of the purchase price of the treasury stock acquired, plus direct acquisition costs over its par value is recorded in additional paid-in capital.
(aa) Trade Accounts Receivable: The amount shown as accounts receivable, trade, at each balance sheet date, includes receivables from charterers for hire, freight and demurrage billings, net of an allowance for credit losses. At each balance sheet date, all potentially uncollectible accounts are assessed individually for purposes of determining the appropriate allowance for credit losses.
On January 1, 2020, the Company adopted Topic 326 “Financial Instruments - Credit Losses. Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments” using the modified retrospective approach. This standard amends the accounting for credit losses on available-for-sale debt securities, purchased financial assets with credit deterioration and clarifies that impairment of receivables arising from operating leases should be accounted for in accordance with ASC 842 “Leases”. In addition, this standard requires the measurement of all expected credit losses for financial assets, including trade accounts receivable, held at the reporting date based on historical experience, current conditions, and current expectations of future economic conditions based on reasonable and supportable forecasts. This new guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements, as the majority of its Accounts receivable, net relates to receivables arising from operating leases and are scoped out of the new standard. As a result of the adoption of this standard, there was no cumulative impact to the Company’s accumulated deficit at January 1, 2020.
F- 25 |
NAVIOS MARITIME HOLDINGS INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars — except share data)
(ab) Convertible Preferred Stock: The Company’s 2% Mandatorily Convertible Preferred Stock (“Preferred Stock”) was recorded at fair market value on the date of issuance. The fair market value was determined using a binomial valuation model. The model which was used took into account the credit spread of the Company, the volatility of its stock, as well as the price of its stock at the issuance date. Each preferred share had a par value of $ . Each holder of Preferred Stock was entitled to receive an annual dividend equal to
(ac) Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock: The Company’s American Depositary Shares, Series G ADSs and the American Depositary Shares, Series H ADSs are recorded at fair market value on issuance. Dividends are payable quarterly in arrears on the Series G ADSs at a rate of % per annum and on the Series H ADSs at a rate of % per annum of the stated liquidation preference. At any time on or after January 28, 2019, the Series G ADSs may be redeemed at the Company’s option and at any time on or after July 8, 2019, the Series H ADSs may be redeemed at the Company’s option (and the American Depositary Shares can be caused to be redeemed), in whole or in part, out of amounts legally available therefore, at a redemption price of $ .00 per share (equivalent to $ .00 per American Depositary Share) plus an amount equal to all accumulated and unpaid dividends thereon to the date of redemption, whether or not declared. The Company has accounted for these shares as equity. For information on Series G ADSs and H ADSs, see Note 17 “Preferred and Common Stock” in the consolidated financial statements.
(ad) Convertible Debenture and Series I Preferred Stock: Concurrently with the refinancing of the NSM loans I & II, Navios Holdings entered into a convertible debenture with NSM (the “Convertible Debenture”) covering certain payments under the NSM Loans including an upfront fee of $
(ae) Investment in Equity Securities: Navios Holdings evaluates its investment in Navios Partners, and evaluated its investment in Navios Containers and Navios Acquisition (through their NMCI Merger and NNA Merger in March 2021 and September 2021, respectively), and Navios Europe II (through its liquidation in June 2020) for OTTI on a quarterly basis. Consideration is given to (i) the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than the carrying value, (ii) the financial condition and near-term prospects of Navios Partners, and (iii) the intent and ability of the Company to retain its investment in Navios Partners for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value. If the Company considers any decline to be “other-than-temporary”, then the Company would write down the carrying amount of the investment to its estimated fair value.
F- 26 |
NAVIOS MARITIME HOLDINGS INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars — except share data)
(af) Financial Instruments and Fair Value: Guidance on Fair Value Measurements provides a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level I measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level III measurements).
A financial instrument’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement. In determining the appropriate levels, the Company performs a detailed analysis of the assets and liabilities that are subject to guidance on Fair Value Measurements.
(ag) Recent Accounting Pronouncements:
Adoption of new accounting pronouncements:
In March 2020, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) ASU 2020-4, “Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848)” (“ASU 2020-4”), which provides optional guidance intended to ease the potential burden in accounting for the expected discontinuation of LIBOR as a reference rate in the financial markets. The guidance can be applied to modifications made to certain contracts to replace LIBOR with a new reference rate. The guidance, if elected, will permit entities to treat such modifications as the continuation of the original contract, without any required accounting reassessments or remeasurements. In addition, in January 2021, the FASB issued another ASU (ASU No. 2021-01) with respect to the Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848). The amendments in this Update clarify that certain optional expedients and exceptions in Topic 848 for contract modifications and hedge accounting apply to derivatives that are affected by the discounting transition. The ASU 2020-4 was effective for the Company beginning on March 12, 2020 and the Company will apply the amendments prospectively through December 31, 2024. Following the deferral of the sunset date of topic 848, as amended by ASU 2022 06. There was no material impact to the Company's consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2022.
In July 2021, the FASB issued ASU 2021-05, Lease (Topic 842): Lessors—Certain Leases with Variable Lease Payments (“ASU 2021-05”). The guidance in ASU 2021-05 amends the lease classification requirements for the lessors under certain leases containing variable payments to align with practice under ASC 840. The lessor should classify and account for a lease with variable lease payments that do not depend on a reference index or a rate as an operating lease if both of the following criteria are met: 1) the lease would have been classified as a sales-type lease or a direct financing lease in accordance with the classification criteria in ASC 842-10-25-2 through 25-3; and 2) the lessor would have otherwise recognized a day-one loss. The amendments in ASU 2021-05 were effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2021. The adoption of this ASU on January 1, 2022 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
On August 5, 2020, the FASB issued ASU No. 2020-06, Debt -Debt with Conversion and Other Options (Subtopic 470-20) and Derivatives and Hedging -Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity (Subtopic 815-40). The objective of this update is to improve understandability and reduce complexity on distinguishing liabilities from equity. Amendments affect entities that issue convertible instruments and/or contracts indexed to and potentially settled in an entity’s own equity. The amendments in this update were effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2021, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The adoption of this ASU on January 1, 2022 through the modified retrospective method did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
NOTE 3: DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
In September 2022, Navios Holdings completed the sale of its
F- 27 |
NAVIOS MARITIME HOLDINGS INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars — except share data)
The difference between the cash consideration received from the disposal and the carrying value of the disposed component resulted in a gain on sale of $
The gain on sale was calculated as follows:
Proceeds received: | ||
Cash consideration | $ | |
Carrying value of assets and liabilities: | ||
Book value of Vessels and other fixed assets | ||
Book value of Operating lease assets and other, net | ||
Book value of Intangible assets other than goodwill | ||
Book value of Goodwill | ||
Bank debt and finance leases payable assumed by Navios Partners | ( | |
Net liabilities derecognized | ( | |
Gain on sale | $ |
Amounts recorded in respect of discontinued operations in the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively are as follows:
Year Ended December 31, 2022 | Year Ended December 31, 2021 | Year Ended December 31, 2020 | ||||||
Revenue | $ | $ | $ | |||||
Time charter, voyage and logistics business expenses | ( |
( |
( | |||||
Direct vessel expenses | ( |
( |
( | |||||
General and administrative expenses | ( |
( |
( | |||||
Depreciation and amortization | ( |
( |
( | |||||
Interest expense and finance cost, net | ( |
( |
( | |||||
Impairment loss/loss on sale of vessels, net | ( |
( | ||||||
(Loss)/gain on bond extinguishment, net | ( |
|||||||
Impairment loss for Navios Europe II | ( | |||||||
Non-operating other finance cost | ( |
|||||||
Gain on sale of shipping business | ||||||||
Other expense, net | ( |
( |
( | |||||
Income tax expense | ( |
( |
( | |||||
Net income/(loss) from discontinued operations | $ | $ | $ | ( |
Assets and liabilities in respect of discontinued operations presented within the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2022 and 2021 are as follows:
December 31, 2022 |
December 31, 2021 | ||||
Cash and cash equivalent | $ | $ | |||
Restricted cash | |||||
Accounts receivable, net | |
||||
Inventories | |
||||
Other current assets | |||||
Vessels and other fixed assets, net | |
||||
Deferred dry dock and special survey costs, net | |
||||
Operating Lease assets | |
||||
Goodwill | |||||
Intangible assets other than goodwill | |||||
Other non-current assets | |||||
Total assets of discontinued operations | $ | $ | |||
Accounts payable | |||||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities | |||||
Deferred income and cash received in advance | |||||
Due to related parties, net | |||||
Operating lease liabilities, including current portion | |||||
Long-term debt, net, including current portion | |||||
Senior and ship mortgage notes, including current portion | |||||
Total liabilities of discontinued operations | $ | $ |
F- 28 |
NAVIOS MARITIME HOLDINGS INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars — except share data)
Borrowings
2022 Notes
On
In January 2022, the Company fully repaid the outstanding balance of $
Hamburg Commercial Bank AG
In
As of September 8, 2022, the outstanding balance of the secured credit facility was assumed by Navios Partners pursuant to the Transaction.
Credit Agricole CIB/ BNP Paribas
In
As of September 8, 2022, the outstanding balance of the secured credit facility was assumed by Navios Partners pursuant to the Transaction.
Sale and Leaseback Agreements
In the
In December 2021, Navios Holdings entered into four new sale and leaseback agreements of $
F- 29 |
NAVIOS MARITIME HOLDINGS INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars — except share data)
Two of sale and leaseback agreements were repayable by
In
In the third quarter of 2022, Navios Holdings completed the acquisition of a previously chartered-in vessel, Navios Sky. In the
The sale and leaseback agreements had no financial covenants.
As of September 8, 2022, the outstanding balances of the sale and leaseback agreements were assumed by Navios Partners pursuant to the Transaction.
NOTE 4: CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AND RESTRICTED CASH
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash consisted of the following:
December 31, 2022 |
December 31, 2021 | ||||
Cash on hand and at banks | $ | $ | |||
Short-term deposits and highly liquid funds | |||||
Restricted cash | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash | $ | |
$ |
Short-term deposits and highly liquid funds relate to amounts held in banks for general financing purposes and represent deposits with an original maturity of less than three months and are included in the consolidated balance sheets under the caption “Cash and cash equivalents”.
Cash deposits and cash equivalents in excess of amounts covered by government-provided insurance are exposed to loss in the event of non-performance by financial institutions. Navios Holdings does maintain cash deposits and equivalents in excess of government provided insurance limits. Navios Holdings reduces exposure to credit risk by dealing with a diversified group of major financial institutions. See also Note 2(e) “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies-Restricted Cash” to the consolidated financial statements.
F- 30 |
NAVIOS MARITIME HOLDINGS INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars — except share data)
NOTE 5: ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE, NET
Accounts receivable consisted of the following:
December 31, 2022 |
December 31, 2021 | ||||
Accounts receivable | $ | $ | |||
Less: Allowance for credit losses | ( |
( | |||
Accounts receivable, net | $ | $ |
Changes to the allowance for credit losses are summarized as follows:
Allowance for credit losses |
Balance at Beginning of Period |
Charges to Costs and Expenses |
Amount Utilized |
Balance at End of Period | ||||||||
Year ended December 31, 2020 | $ | ( |
$ | ( |
$ | $ | ( | |||||
Year ended December 31, 2021 | $ | ( |
$ | ( |
$ | $ | ( | |||||
Year ended December 31, 2022 | $ | ( |
$ | ( |
$ | $ | ( |
For the year ended December 31, 2022, two customers accounted for
NOTE 6: PREPAID EXPENSES AND OTHER CURRENT ASSETS
Prepaid expenses and other current assets consisted of the following:
December 31, 2022 |
December 31, 2021 | ||||
Prepaid voyage and operating costs | $ | $ | |||
Claims receivable | ( | ||||
Prepaid other taxes | |||||
Other | |||||
Total prepaid expenses and other current assets | $ | $ |
Claims receivable mainly represents claims against vessels’ insurance underwriters in respect of damages arising from accidents or other insured risks, as well as claims under charter contracts including off-hires. While it is anticipated that claims receivable will be recovered within one year, such claims may not all be recovered within one year due to the attendant process of settlement. Nonetheless, amounts are classified as current as they represent amounts currently due to the Company. All amounts are shown net of applicable deductibles.
NOTE 7: VESSELS, PORT TERMINALS AND OTHER FIXED ASSETS, NET
Tanker vessels, barges and pushboats (Navios Logistics) |
Cost | Accumulated Depreciation |
Net Book Value | ||||||
Balance January 1, 2020 | $ | $ | ( |
$ | |||||
Additions | ( |
( | |||||||
Write-down | ( |
— | ( | ||||||
Balance December 31, 2020 | $ | $ | ( |
$ | |||||
Additions | ( |
( | |||||||
Impairment loss | ( |
( | |||||||
Transfers from other long-term assets | — | ||||||||
Balance December 31, 2021 | $ | $ | ( |
$ | |||||
Additions | ( |
( | |||||||
Impairment loss | ( |
( | |||||||
Sale of vessel | ( |
— | ( | ||||||
Balance December 31, 2022 | $ | $ | ( |
$ |
F- 31 |
NAVIOS MARITIME HOLDINGS INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars — except share data)
Port Terminals (Navios Logistics) |
Cost | Accumulated Depreciation |
Net Book Value | ||||||
Balance January 1, 2020 | $ | $ | ( |
$ | |||||
Additions | ( |
( | |||||||
Write offs | ( |
( | |||||||
Balance December 31, 2020 | $ | $ | ( |
$ | |||||
Additions | ( |
( | |||||||
Disposal | ( |
||||||||
Transfers from other long-term assets | — | ||||||||
Balance December 31, 2021 | $ | $ | ( |
$ | |||||
Additions | ( |
( | |||||||
Balance December 31, 2022 | $ | $ | ( |
$ |
Other fixed assets (Navios Logistics) |
Cost | Accumulated Depreciation |
Net Book Value | ||||||
Balance January 1, 2020 | $ | $ | ( |
$ | |||||
Additions | ( |
( | |||||||
Balance December 31, 2020 | $ | $ | ( |
$ | |||||
Additions | ( |
( | |||||||
Balance December 31, 2021 | $ | $ | ( |
$ | |||||
Additions | ( |
( | |||||||
Disposals | ( |
— | ( | ||||||
Balance December 31, 2022 | $ | $ | ( |
$ |
Total (Navios Logistics) | Cost | Accumulated Depreciation | Net Book Value | ||||||
Balance January 1, 2020 | $ | $ | ( |
$ | |||||
Additions | ( |
( | |||||||
Write-down | ( |
( | |||||||
Balance December 31, 2020 | $ | $ | ( |
$ | |||||
Additions | ( |
( | |||||||
Disposal | ( |
||||||||
Impairment loss | ( |
( | |||||||
Transfers from other long-term assets | — | ||||||||
Balance December 31, 2021 | $ | $ | ( |
$ | |||||
Additions | ( |
( | |||||||
Impairment loss | ( |
( | |||||||
Sale of vessel | ( |
— | ( | ||||||
Disposals | ( |
— | ( | ||||||
Balance December 31, 2022 | $ | $ | ( |
$ |
F- 32 |
NAVIOS MARITIME HOLDINGS INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars — except share data)
On September 8, 2022, the Company completed the sale of its owned vessels to Navios Partners. For further information see Note 3 “Discontinued operations” in the consolidated financial statements.
Navios Logistics
Since 2018, Navios Logistics has acquired approximately hectares of undeveloped land located in Port Murtinho, Brazil for a total cost of $ . Navios Logistics plans to develop this land for its port operations.
Deposits for Vessels and Port Terminals Acquisitions
As of December 31, 2022, Navios Logistics has paid $.
for the construction of a new stockpile in its Iron Ore Port Terminal and is included under the caption “Other long-term assets” in the consolidated statement of financial positionAs of December 31, 2022, and 2021, Navios Logistics has paid $“Other long-term assets”.
and $ , respectively, for capitalized expenses for the development of its port operations in Port Murtinho, Brazil, which was included in the consolidated statement of financial position under the captionAs of December 31, 2022, Navios Logistics has paid $ for the construction of a crane in the Iron Ore Port Terminal, which is included under the caption “Other long-term assets”.
During the first quarter of 2021, Navios Logistics completed the construction of six liquid barges. As of December 31, 2021, a total of $
had been transferred to “Vessels, port terminals and other fixed assets, net” in the consolidated statement of financial position, of which capitalized interest amounted to $ .During the first quarter of 2021, Navios Logistics completed the construction of two new tanks in its Liquid Port Terminal. As of December 31, 2021, a total of $
had been transferred to “Vessels, port terminals and other fixed assets, net” in the consolidated statement of financial position.During the second quarter of 2021, Navios Logistics completed the construction of a crane in its Grain Port Terminal. As of December 31, 2021, a total of $
was transferred to “Vessels, port terminals and other fixed assets, net” in the consolidated statement of financial position.Impairment Loss/ Loss on Sale of Vessels, Net
As of December 31, 2022, Navios Logistics completed the sale of vessel Malva H for a sale price of $
In 2022, Navios Logistics recorded an impairment loss of $
Assets Acquisitions
In the fourth quarter of 2020, Navios Logistics signed a purchase agreement with an unrelated third party
(the “Navios Logistics 2020 Fleet”), for a purchase price of $ . The acquisition was completed on . As of December 31, 2021, a total of $ was transferred to “Vessels, port terminals and other fixed assets, net” in the consolidated statement of financial position.
NOTE 8: INTANGIBLE ASSETS OTHER THAN GOODWILL
Net Book Value of Intangible Assets other than Goodwill as at December 31, 2022
December 31, 2022 | Acquisition Cost |
Accumulated Depreciation |
Net Book Value | |||||
Port terminal operating rights | $ | $ | ( |
$ | | |||
Customer relationships | ( |
| ||||||
Total intangible assets | $ | $ | ( |
$ |
Net Book Value of Intangible Assets other than Goodwill as at December 31, 2021
December 31, 2021 | Acquisition Cost |
Accumulated Depreciation |
Net Book Value | |||||
Port terminal operating rights | $ | $ | ( |
$ | ||||
Customer relationships | ( |
|||||||
Total intangible assets | $ | $ | ( |
$ |
F- 33 |
NAVIOS MARITIME HOLDINGS INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars — except share data)
Amortization expense the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020 were as follows:
Amortization Expense Year Ended December 31, 2022 |
Amortization Expense Year Ended December 31, 2021 |
Amortization Expense Year Ended December 31, 2020 | ||||||
Port terminal operating rights | $ | $ | $ | |||||
Customer relationships | ||||||||
Total | $ | $ | $ |
The remaining aggregate amortization of acquired intangibles as of December 31, 2022 was as follows:
Description |
Within one year |
Year Two | Year Three | Year Four | Year Five | Thereafter | Total | ||||||||||||||
Port terminal operating rights | $ | $ | $ |
|
$ | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||||||
Customer relationships | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total amortization | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ |
NOTE 9: INVESTMENTS IN AFFILIATE COMPANIES
Navios Partners
On August 7, 2007, Navios Holdings formed Navios Partners under the laws of the Republic of Marshall Islands. Navios GP L.L.C., a wholly owned subsidiary of Navios Holdings, was also formed on that date to act as the general partner of Navios Partners and received a
% general partner interest. In August 2019, Navios Holdings sold the general partnership interests in Navios Partners (except for the incentive distribution rights) to NSM. Olympos Maritime Ltd. is currently Navios Partners’ general partner (the “General Partner”).As of December 31, 2022 and 2021 Navios Partners has issued
units, for both periods through its Continuous Offering Programs entered into from time to time. Pursuant to the issuance of common units, Navios Partners issued general partnership units to its general partner both as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, in order to maintain its 2.0% general partnership interest.As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, as a result of the NMCI Merger and NNA Merger, Navios Holdings holds a total of
common units representing a interest in Navios Partners, and the investment in Navios Partners is accounted for under the equity method. Incentive distribution rights are held by Navios GP L.L.C.As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the carrying amount of the investment in Navios Partners was $he amount was included under the caption “Equity in net (losses)/earnings of affiliate companies”.
and $ , respectively. During the year ended December 31, 2022, the Company recognized an other-than-temporary impairment loss (“OTTI”) of $ relating to its investment in Navios Partners, as the decline in fair value of the investment to below its carrying value is not considered temporary. TAs of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the unamortized difference between the carrying amount of the investment in Navios Partners and the amount of the Company’s underlying equity in net assets of Navios Partners was $ As a result of the OTTI loss recorded as at September 30, 2022, the Company recomputed this difference to be amortized in future period through “Equity in net (losses)/earnings of affiliate companies” over the remaining life of the tangible and intangible assets of Navios Partners.
and $ , respectively.
F- 34 |
NAVIOS MARITIME HOLDINGS INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars — except share data)
Total equity method (loss)/income of $
, including OTTI, $ were recognized under the caption “Equity in net (losses)/earnings of affiliate companies” for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively.Dividends received during the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020 were $
, $ , and $ , respectively.As of December 31, 2022, the market value of the investment in Navios Partners was $
. Based on Company’s evaluation of the duration and magnitude of the fair value decline, Navios Partners’ financial condition and near-term prospects, and the Company’s intent and ability to hold its investment in Navios Partners until recovery, the Company concluded that the decline in fair value of its investment in Navios Partners below its carrying value is temporary and, therefore, no additional impairment was recorded during the forth quarter of 2022.Navios Acquisition
On August 25, 2021, Navios Partners entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger with Navios Acquisition.
On August 25, 2021, Navios Partners purchased
shares of Navios Acquisition, thereby acquiring a controlling interest in Navios Acquisition, and the results of operations of Navios Acquisition are included in Navios Partners’ consolidated statements of operations commencing on August 26, 2021. Pursuant to the NNA Merger, on August 26, 2021, Navios Acquisition called for redemption of all of its outstanding % first Priority Ship Mortgage Notes due November 15, 2021 (the “Navios Acquisition’s Ship Mortgage Notes”) and remitted to the indenture trustee the aggregate redemption price payable to the holders of the Navios Acquisition’s Ship Mortgage Notes to satisfy and discharge Navios Acquisition’s obligations under the indenture relating to the Navios Acquisition Ship Mortgage Notes. The redemption date for the Navios Acquisition Ship Mortgage Notes was .On October 15, 2021, Navios Partners completed the NNA Merger. As a result thereof, Navios Acquisition became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Navios Partners. Each outstanding common unit of Navios Acquisition that was held by a unitholder, other than Navios Partners, Navios Acquisition and their respective subsidiaries was converted into the right to receive
common units of Navios Partners. As a result of the NNA Merger, common units of Navios Partners were issued to former public unitholders of Navios Acquisition.Upon completion of the NNA Merger, Navios Holdings derecognized its investment in Navios Acquisition.
During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company recognized an OTTI loss of $, relating to its investment in Navios Acquisition and the amount was included under the caption “Equity in net (losses)/earnings of affiliate companies”.
Total equity method income of nil,
$ and $ , was recognized under the caption “Equity in net (losses)/earnings of affiliate companies” for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively.Dividends received for each of the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020 were $
, $ and $ .Navios Containers
Following the sale of the Navios Containers general partnership interest that was consummated on August 30, 2019, Navios Holdings evaluated its investment in the common stock of Navios Containers under ASC 323 and concluded that it had the ability to exercise significant influence over the operating and financial policies of Navios Containers and, therefore, its investment in Navios Containers was accounted for under the equity method, through the NMCI Merger on March 31, 2021.
On January 4, 2021, Navios Containers and Navios Partners announced that they had entered into a definitive merger agreement. Under the terms of the NMCI Merger, Navios Partners acquired all of the publicly held common units of Navios Containers through the issuance of
newly issued common units of Navios Partners in exchange for the publicly held common units of Navios Containers at an exchange ratio of units of Navios Partners for each Navios Containers common unit. The NMCI Merger was completed on March 31, 2021.Upon completion of the NMCI Merger, as of March 31, 2021, Navios Holdings derecognized its investment in Navios Containers.
Total equity method income of nil,
$ and $ was recognized under the caption “Equity in net (losses)/earnings of affiliate companies” for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively.F- 35 |
NAVIOS MARITIME HOLDINGS INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars — except share data)
Navios Europe II
On February 18, 2015, Navios Holdings, Navios Acquisition and Navios Partners established Navios Europe II. From June 8, 2015 through December 31, 2015, Navios Europe II acquired
vessels for aggregate consideration consisting of: (i) cash (which was funded with the proceeds of a senior loan facility (the “Senior Loans II”) and loans aggregating to $ from Navios Holdings, Navios Acquisition and Navios Partners (in each case, in proportion to their economic interests in Navios Europe II) (collectively, the “Navios Term Loans II”) and (ii) the assumption of a junior participating loan facility (the “Junior Loan II”). In addition to the Navios Term Loans II, Navios Holdings, Navios Acquisition and Navios Partners would also make available to Navios Europe II revolving loans up to $ to fund working capital requirements (collectively, the “Navios Revolving Loans II”). In March 2017, the amount of the Navios Revolving Loans II increased by $ . On April 21, 2020, Navios Europe II and the lenders agreed to fully release the liabilities under the Junior Loan II for $ . On December 31, 2019, Navios Holdings had a $ receivable from Navios Europe II. The structure was liquidated in June 2020.On an ongoing basis, Navios Europe II was required to distribute cash flows (after payment of operating expenses and amounts due pursuant to the terms of the Senior Loans II) according to a defined waterfall calculation.
Navios Holdings had evaluated its investment in Navios Europe II under ASC 810 and had concluded that Navios Europe II was a VIE and that it was not the party most closely associated with Navios Europe II and, accordingly, was not the primary beneficiary of Navios Europe II.
Navios Holdings had further evaluated its investment in the common stock of Navios Europe II under ASC 323 and had concluded that it had the ability to exercise significant influence over the operating and financial policies of Navios Europe II and, therefore, its investment in Navios Europe II had been accounted for under the equity method.
The initial amount provided for in Navios Europe II of $
, at the inception included the Company’s share of the basis difference between the fair value and the underlying book value of the assets of Navios Europe II, which amounted to $ . This difference had been amortized through “Equity in net (losses)/earnings of affiliate companies” over the remaining life of Navios Europe II.As of March 31, 2020, the Company considered the decline in fair value of its investment in Navios Europe II as OTTI and therefore recognized a loss of $
in the accompanying consolidated statement of comprehensive income/(loss).As of December 31, 2020, the Company received in cash all balances relating to Navios Europe II following the liquidation of the structure and recognized a loss of $
included in the accompanying consolidated statements of comprehensive income/(loss) for the year ended December 31, 2020, under the caption “Impairment of loan receivable from affiliate company” (Note 16).No income was recognized under the caption “Equity in net earnings/(loss) of affiliate companies” for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
As of December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, the carrying amount of the investment in Navios Europe II and the balance of Navios Terms Loans II was $
.Following the results of the significance tests performed by the Company, it was concluded that Navios Partners met the significance threshold requiring summarized financial information of all affiliate companies being presented.
Summarized financial information of the affiliate companies is presented below:
Balance sheet – Navios Partners | December 31, 2022 |
December 31, 2021 | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents, including restricted cash | $ | $ | |||||
Current assets | $ | $ | |||||
Non-current assets | $ | $ | |||||
Current liabilities | $ | $ | |||||
Long- term debt including current portion, net | $ | $ | |||||
Non-current liabilities | $ | $ |
December 31, 2022 | ||||||||
Income Statement | Navios Partners |
Navios Acquisition |
Navios Containers | |||||
Revenue | $ | $ | $ | |||||
Net income | $ | $ | $ |
Income Statement | Navios Partners 01/01/2021-12/31/2021 |
Navios Acquisition 01/01/2021-10/15/2021 |
Navios Containers 01/01/2021-03/31/2021 | |||||
Revenue | $ | $ | $ | |||||
Net income/(loss) | $ | $ | ( |
$ |
December 31, 2020 | ||||||||||
Income Statement | Navios Partners |
Navios Acquisition |
Navios Europe II |
Navios Containers | ||||||
Revenue | $ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||
Net (loss)/income | $ | ( |
$ | $ | ( |
$ |
F- 36 |
NAVIOS MARITIME HOLDINGS INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars — except share data)
NOTE 10: ACCRUED EXPENSES AND OTHER LIABILITIES
Accrued expenses and other liabilities as of December 31, 2022 and 2021 consisted of the following:
December 31, 2022 | December 31, 2021 | ||||
Payroll | $ | $ | |||
Accrued interest | |||||
Accrued voyage expenses | |||||
Audit fees and related services | |||||
Accrued taxes | |||||
Professional fees | |||||
Other accrued expenses | |||||
Total accrued expenses | $ | $ |
NOTE 11: BORROWINGS
Borrowings as of December 31, 2022 and 2021 consisted of the following:
Navios Holdings borrowings | December 31, 2022 |
December 31, 2021 | |||
2022 Senior Secured Notes | |||||
2024 Notes | | ||||
NSM Loan (incl. accrued interest $306 and $526, respectively) | |||||
$115.0 million NSM Loan (incl. accrued interest $571) | |||||
Convertible Debenture | |||||
Total Navios Holdings borrowings | $ | $ |
Navios Logistics borrowings | December 31, 2022 | December 31, 2021 | |||
2025 Logistics Senior Notes | |||||
Navios Logistics Notes Payable | |||||
2022 Navios Logistics BBVA Facility | |||||
2022 Navios Logistics Alpha Bank Loan | |||||
Navios Logistics BBVA Facility | |||||
Navios Logistics Alpha Bank Loan | |||||
Navios Logistics Santander Facility | |||||
Seller’s Credit Agreement for the construction of six liquid barges | |||||
Seller’s Credit Agreement for the Navios Logistics’ 2020 Fleet | |||||
Total Navios Logistics borrowings | $ | $ |
Total | December 31, 2022 | December 31, 2021 | |||
Total borrowings | $ | $ | |||
Less: current portion, net | ( |
( | |||
Less: deferred finance costs and discount, net | ( |
( | |||
Total long-term borrowings | $ | $ |
F- 37 |
NAVIOS MARITIME HOLDINGS INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars — except share data)
Navios Holdings Debt
2022 Senior Secured Notes
On
On March 18, 2022, June 6, 2022 and June 30, 2022 the Company issued a notice of redemption with respect to an aggregate principal amount of $
In August 2022, the Company fully redeemed the outstanding balance of $
During the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company redeemed an aggregate principal amount of $
No redemptions incurred during the year ended December 31, 2020.
2024 Notes
On
On
The 2024 Notes are Navios Holdings’ senior unsecured general obligations and rank senior in right of payment to any of Navios Holding’s existing and future debt that expressly provides that it is subordinated to the 2024 Notes, pari passu in right of payment with all of Navios Holding’s existing and future senior obligations, structurally subordinated in right of payment to the obligations of Navios Holding’s subsidiaries, and effectively subordinated in right of payment to any existing and future obligations of Navios Holdings that are secured by property or assets that do not secure the 2024 Notes, including the 2022 Senior Secured Notes and the 2022 Notes, to the extent of the value of any such property and assets securing such other obligations. The 2024 Notes are not guaranteed by any of Navios Holdings’ subsidiaries.
The indenture governing the 2024 Notes does not contain restrictive covenants but does include customary events of default.
Navios Holdings has the option to redeem the 2024 Notes, in whole or in part, at any time, at a redemption price equal to
Secured Credit Facilities
NSM Loan I
In
In the third quarter of 2022, the outstanding balance under NSM Loan I was fully repaid using cash received from the Transaction. Such repayment was mandatory as per the terms of the loan agreement. The amount of $
F- 38 |
NAVIOS MARITIME HOLDINGS INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars — except share data)
NSM Loan II
In
In the third quarter of 2022, the outstanding balance under NSM Loan II was fully repaid using cash received from the Transaction. Such repayment was mandatory as per the terms of the loan agreement. The amount of $
Upon completion of the refinancing in January 2022, NSM received an upfront fee of $24,000 in respect of the NSM Loan I and the NSM Loan II in the form of a Convertible Debenture that is included in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income under the caption “Non-operating other finance cost”. The agreements also provided for prepayment premiums ranging from
Convertible Debenture
In December 2021, Navios Holdings entered into a convertible debenture with NSM, covering certain payments under the NSM Loans including an upfront fee of $
Navios Logistics Debt
2022 Logistics Senior Notes
On
, Navios Logistics and its wholly-owned subsidiary Navios Logistics Finance (US) Inc. (“Logistics Finance” and, together with Navios Logistics (the “Logistics Co-Issuers”) issued $ in aggregate principal amount of its Senior Notes due on (the “2022 Logistics Senior Notes”), at a fixed rate of . The 2022 Logistics Senior Notes were unregistered were fully and unconditionally guaranteed, jointly and severally, by all of Navios Logistics’ direct and indirect subsidiaries except for three subsidiaries, which were deemed to be immaterial, and Logistics Finance, which was the co-issuer of the 2022 Logistics Senior Notes. The 2022 Logistics Senior Notes were redeemed in full on at of their face amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the redemption date with the proceeds of the 2025 Logistics Senior Notes (as defined herein). Following this transaction, Navios Logistics recognized a loss of $ relating to the accelerated amortization of the unamortized deferred financing costs and is included in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income/(loss) under the caption “Loss on bond and debt extinguishment, net”.Navios Logistics Term Loan B Facility
On
, Navios Logistics and Logistics Finance, as co-borrowers, completed the issuance of a $ Term Loan B Facility (the “Navios Logistics Term Loan B Facility”). The Navios Logistics Term Loan B Facility bore an interest rate of plus basis points and has a four-year term with amortization per annum. The Navios Logistics Term Loan B Facility was repaid in full on at par plus accrued and unpaid interest to the repayment date with the proceeds of the 2025 Logistics Senior Notes. Following this transaction, Navios Logistics recognized a loss of $ relating to the accelerated amortization of the unamortized deferred financing costs and is included in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income/(loss) under the caption “Loss on bond and debt extinguishment, net”.F- 39 |
NAVIOS MARITIME HOLDINGS INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars — except share data)
2025 Logistics Senior Notes
On
, Navios Logistics and its wholly-owned subsidiary Navios Logistics Finance (US) Inc. (“Logistics Finance” and, together with Navios Logistics (the “Logistics Co-Issuers”) issued $ in aggregate principal amount of senior secured notes due on , at a fixed rate per annum of % (the “2025 Logistics Senior Notes”).The 2025 Co-Issuers have the option to redeem the 2025 Notes in whole or in part, at any time on or after August 1, 2022, at a fixed price of
of the principal amount, which declines to on August 1, 2023 and to par on August 1, 2024. The Logistics Co-Issuers may also redeem all, but not less than all, of the 2025 Logistics Senior Notes at a price equal to of the principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, upon certain changes in law that would trigger the payment of withholding taxes. Furthermore, upon the occurrence of certain change of control events, the Logistics Co-Issuers may be required to offer to purchase 2025 Logistics Senior Notes from holders at a price equal to of the principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any.The 2025 Logistics Senior Notes are senior secured obligations of the Logistics Co-Issuers and rank equal in right of payment to all of their existing and future senior indebtedness and senior in right of payment to all of their future subordinated indebtedness. The 2025 Logistics Senior Notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed, jointly and severally, by all of the Navios Logistics’ direct and indirect subsidiaries, other than the Logistics Co-Issuer.
The 2025 Logistics Senior Notes are effectively senior to all existing and future obligations of the subsidiary guarantors that own Collateral, to the extent of the value of the Collateral but effectively junior to any existing and future secured obligations of the Logistics Co-Issuers and the subsidiary guarantors that are secured by assets other than the Collateral, to the extent of the value of any assets securing such other obligations. The indenture governing the 2025 Logistics Senior Notes contains restrictive covenants that limit, among other things, the ability of the Logistics Co-Issuers and their restricted subsidiaries to incur additional indebtedness, pay dividends and make distributions on common and preferred stock, make other restricted payments, make investments, incur liens, consolidate, merge, sell or otherwise dispose of all or substantially all of their assets and enter into certain transactions with affiliate companies, in each case, subject to exclusions, and other customary covenants. The indenture governing the 2025 Logistics Senior Notes also contains customary events of default.The Logistics Co-Issuers were in compliance with the covenants as of December 31, 2022.
As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, deferred financing costs associated with the 2025 Logistics Senior Notes amounted to $
and $ , respectively.Navios Logistics Notes Payable
In connection with the purchase of mechanical equipment for the expansion of its dry port terminal, Corporacion Navios S.A. (“CNSA”) entered into an unsecured export financing line of credit for a total amount of $and will convert to the Commercial Interest Reference Rates (“CIRR”) or Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”), to be agreed with the bank within 2023. The unsecured export financing line is fully and unconditionally guaranteed by Ponte Rio S.A. As of December 31, 2022, Navios Logistics had drawn the total available amount and the outstanding balance of Navios Logistics Notes Payable was $ .
, including all related fixed financing costs of $ , available in multiple drawings upon the completion of certain milestones (“Drawdown Events”). CNSA incurs the obligation for the respective amount drawn by signing promissory notes (“Navios Logistics Notes Payable”). Each drawdown is repayable in consecutive installments, starting six months after the completion of each Drawdown Event. Together with each Navios Logistics Notes Payable, CNSA pays interest equal toF- 40 |
NAVIOS MARITIME HOLDINGS INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars — except share data)
2022 Navios Logistics Alpha Bank Loan
On
2022 Navios Logistics BBVA Facility
On
Navios Logistics Santander Facility
On March 25, 2022, Navios Logistics entered into a $
Seller’s Credit Agreement for the construction of six liquid barges
In had drawn the total available amount and the outstanding balance was $.
, Navios Logistics entered into a $ seller’s credit agreement to be made available by way of credit in equal tranches. Each drawdown is repayable in installments starting from the delivery of each barge. The seller’s credit for the construction of the six liquid barges bears interest at a fixed rate of . As of December 31, 2022, Navios LogisticsSeller’s Credit Agreement for the Navios Logistics’ 2020 Fleet
In the
, Navios Logistics entered into a purchase agreement with an unrelated third party (the “Navios Logistics’ 2020 Fleet”). The acquisition was completed on March 22, 2021, and the Company entered into a $ seller’s credit agreement for the acquisition of the Navios Logistics’ 2020 Fleet. The seller’s credit agreement bears interest at a of per annum and is payable in three equal installments of $ . As of December 31, 2022, the outstanding balance was $ .Navios Logistics Other long-term loans
In connection with the acquisition of Hidronave S.A. on
, Navios Logistics assumed a $ loan facility that was entered into by Hidronave S.A. in 2001, The loan facility bore interest at a of basis points. The loan was repayable in installments of $ . In September 2021, this loan was repaid in full.During the year ended and sale and leaseback agreements, $ related to amounts assumed by Navios Partners due to the Transaction as discussed above and $ related to NSM Loans. During the year ended December 31, 2022, the proceeds from the NSM Loans were $ , the proceeds from long term debt were $ and the proceeds from the three sale and leaseback agreements were $ . The above payments and proceeds include debt from continuing and discontinued operations. , the Company paid $ related to its secured credit facilities
During the year ended The above payments and proceeds include debt from continuing and discontinued operations.
, the Company in relation to its secured credit facilities paid $ related to scheduled repayment installments and $ related to the prepayment of four of Navios Holdings’ credit facilities. During the year ended December 31, 2021, the proceeds from the $115.0 NSM Loan was $ and from the three Sale and Leaseback Agreements for Navios Holdings were $ .F- 41 |
NAVIOS MARITIME HOLDINGS INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars — except share data)
During the year ended
The annual weighted average interest rates of the Company’s total borrowings were
The maturity table below reflects the principal payments for the next five years and thereafter of all borrowings of Navios Holdings (including Navios Logistics) outstanding as of December 31, 2022, based on the repayment schedules of the respective loan facilities and the outstanding amount due under the debt securities.
Year | ||
2023 | $ | |
2024 | ||
2025 | ||
2026 | ||
2027 and thereafter | ||
Total | $ |
NOTE 12: FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
Fair value of financial instruments
The Company uses the following methods and assumptions to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instrument:
Cash and cash equivalents: The carrying amounts reported in the consolidated balance sheets for interest bearing deposits and money market funds approximate their fair value because of the short maturity of these investments.
Restricted cash: The carrying amounts reported in the consolidated balance sheets for interest bearing deposits approximate their fair value because of the short maturity of these investments.
Borrowings: The book value has been adjusted to reflect the net presentation of deferred financing costs. The outstanding balance of the floating rate loans continues to approximate its fair value, excluding the effect of any deferred financing costs. As of December 31, 2022, the 2025 Logistics Senior Notes and four Navios Logistics’ loans are fixed rate borrowings and their fair value was determined based on quoted market prices. As of December 31, 2021, the 2025 Logistics Senior Notes, the 2022 Senior Secured Notes and two Navios Logistics’ loans were fixed rate borrowings and their fair value was determined based on quoted market prices.
Loans payable to affiliate companies: The carrying amount of the fixed rate loan approximates its fair value.
Loans payable to affiliate companies, including Convertible Debenture: The carrying amount of the fixed rate loan approximates its fair value.
The estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments were as follows:
December 31, 2022 | December 31, 2021 | ||||||||||
Book Value | Fair Value | Book Value | Fair Value | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | $ | $ | $ | |||||||
Restricted cash | $ | $ | $ | $ | |||||||
Senior and ship mortgage notes, net | $ | ( |
$ | ( |
$ | ( |
$ | ( | |||
Long-term debt, including current portion | $ | ( |
$ | ( |
$ | ( |
$ | ( | |||
Loans payable to affiliate companies, including current portion | $ | $ | $ | ( |
$ | ( | |||||
Convertible debenture payable to affiliate companies(2) | $ | ( |
$ | ( |
$ | $ |
F- 42 |
NAVIOS MARITIME HOLDINGS INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars — except share data)
As required by the fair value guidance, assets are categorized in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement
As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, there were no assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis.
As of December 31, 2022, there were no assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis.
As of December 31, 2021, the Company’s assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis were:
Fair Value Measurements as of December 31, 2021 | ||||||||||||
Total | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level I) |
Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level II) |
Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level III) | |||||||||
Vessels, port terminals and other fixed assets, net | $ | $ | — | $ | $ | — | ||||||
Total | $ | $ | — | $ | $ | — |
Navios Logistics recorded an impairment loss of $ for two of its tanker vessels operating in the Cabotage Business during the year ended December 31, 2021, the fair value of which is measured at $ , as at December 31, 2021.
Fair Value Measurements
The estimated fair value of our financial instruments that are not measured at fair value on a recurring basis, categorized based upon the fair value hierarchy, are as follows:
Level I: Inputs are unadjusted, quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that the Company has the ability to access. Valuation of these items does not entail a significant amount of judgment.
Level II: Inputs other than quoted prices included in Level I that are observable for the asset or liability through corroboration with market data at the measurement date.
Level III: Inputs that are unobservable.
Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2022 | |||||||||||
Total | (Level I) | (Level II) | (Level III) | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | $ | $ | $ | — | ||||||
Restricted cash | $ | $ | $ | $ | — | ||||||
Senior and ship mortgage notes | $ | ( |
$ | ( |
$ | ( |
$ | — | |||
Long-term debt, including current portion(1) | $ | ( |
$ | $ | ( |
$ | — | ||||
Convertible debenture payable to affiliate companies(2) | $ | ( |
$ | $ | ( |
$ | — |
Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2021 | |||||||||||
Total | (Level I) | (Level II) | (Level III) | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | $ | $ | $ | — | ||||||
Restricted cash | $ | $ | $ | $ | — | ||||||
Senior and ship mortgage notes | $ | ( |
$ | ( |
$ | ( |
$ | — | |||
Long-term debt, including current portion(1) | $ | ( |
$ | $ | ( |
$ | — | ||||
Loans payable to affiliate companies, including current portion | $ | ( |
$ | $ | ( |
$ | — |
(1) | |
(2) |
F- 43 |
NAVIOS MARITIME HOLDINGS INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars — except share data)
NOTE 13: EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
Stock Plan
The Company has awarded restricted share units, shares of restricted common stock and restricted stock units to its employees, officers and directors. The restriction lapses in two, three or four equal tranches, over the requisite service periods, of one, two, three and four years from the grant date. The Company has also awarded share appreciation rights and stock options to its officers and directors only, based on service conditions, which vest in three equal tranches over the requisite service periods of one, two and three years from the grant date. Each option expires seven years after its grant date. No stock options were exercised during the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020. As of December 31, 2022, “ stock options remain outstanding expiring in 2023. Please refer to Note 2(s)Summary of Significant Accounting Policies- Employee benefits” to the consolidated financial statements.
During the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, the Company did not award any restricted stock, restricted stock units or stock options, which vest upon achievement of certain performance conditions.
The weighted average grant date fair value of restricted stock granted during the year ended December 31, 2022 was $
.The weighted average grant date fair value of restricted stock granted during the year ended December 31, 2021 was $
.restricted stock has been granted for the year ended December 31, 2020.
The effect of compensation expense arising from the stock-based arrangements described above amounted to $
, $ and $ for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively and it was reflected in general and administrative expenses on the consolidated statements of comprehensive income/(loss). The recognized compensation expense for the year is presented as an adjustment to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities on the consolidated statements of cash flows.The outstanding stock-based awards relate to grants to the Company’s officers and directors.
The summary of stock-based awards is summarized as follows (in thousands except share and per share data which have been adjusted to reflect the Reverse Stock Split):
Options | Shares | Weighted average exercise price |
Weighted average remaining term |
Aggregate fair value | |||||
Outstanding as of December 31, 2021 | $ | ||||||||
Vested at December 31, 2021 | — | — | — | ||||||
Exercisable at December 31, 2021 | — | — | — | ||||||
Forfeited or expired | ( |
— | — | ( | |||||
Outstanding as of December 31, 2022 | |
$ | | ||||||
Restricted stock and restricted stock units | |||||||||
Non Vested as of December 31, 2021 | $ | — | |||||||
Granted | — | — | |||||||
Vested | ( |
— | — | ( | |||||
Forfeited or expired | ( |
— | — | ( | |||||
Non Vested as of December 31, 2022 | $ | — |
The estimated compensation cost relating to service conditions of non-vested (i) share appreciation rights and stock options and (ii) restricted share units, restricted stock and restricted stock unit awards, not yet recognized was $
and $ , respectively, as of December 31, 2022 and is expected to be recognized over the weighted average period of years.F- 44 |
NAVIOS MARITIME HOLDINGS INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars — except share data)
NOTE 14: COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
As of December 31, 2022, the Company was contingently liable for letters of guarantee and letters of credit amounting to $
.
In September 2020, Navios Logistics agreed to a settlement regarding a storage and transshipment contract in the grain port terminal for a total amount to be paid to Navios Logistics as a result of the settlement of $. For the year ended December 31, 2020, a gain of $ , which is collected in equal installments of $ on June 1, 2021, 2022 and 2023. In June 2021 and 2022, Navios Logistics collected the first installment and second installments was included under the caption “Other income” in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income/(loss).
On April 28, 2022, Navios Logistics entered into a Please refer to Note 15 “Leases”.
leasing . The lease contract is payable by consecutive payments of $ each, commencing with the delivery date of the applicable barge.In July 2022, Vale S.A. announced the closing of the sale of its iron ore, manganese ore and logistics assets in the midwestern system to J&F Mineracao Ltda., an entity controlled by J&F Investimentos S.A. The Vale port contract entered into between Corporacion Navios S.A., a company controlled by Navios Logistics, and Vale International S.A. (“Vale”), dated September 27, 2013, remains in full force and effect. Any transfer, novation, or assignment of the Vale port contract or any obligations or rights arising thereunder by Vale is subject to the prior approval of the Navios counterparty.
The Company is involved in various disputes and arbitration proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. Provisions have been recognized in the financial statements for all such proceedings where the Company believes that a liability may be probable, and for which the amounts can be reasonably estimated, based upon facts known on the date the financial statements were prepared. Although the Company cannot predict with certainty the ultimate resolutions of these matters, in the opinion of management, the ultimate disposition of these matters is not expected to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or liquidity.
NOTE 15: LEASES
Time charter out contracts
The Company’s contract revenues from time chartering are governed by ASC 842. Upon adoption of ASC 842, the timing and recognition of earnings from the time charter contracts to which the Company is party did not change from previous practice. In a time charter contract, the Company is responsible for all the costs incurred for running the vessel such as crew costs, vessel insurance, repairs and maintenance and lubes. The charterer bears the voyage related costs such as bunker expenses, port charges and canal tolls during the hire period. The Company has determined to recognize lease revenue as a combined single lease component for all time charters (operating leases) as the related lease component and non-lease component will have the same timing and pattern of the revenue recognition of the combined single lease component. The performance obligations in a time charter contract are satisfied over the term of the contract beginning when the vessel is delivered to the charterer until it is redelivered back to the Company. The Company determined that all time charter contracts are considered operating leases and therefore fall under the scope of ASC 842 because: (i) the vessel is an identifiable asset; (ii) the Company does not have substantive substitution rights; and (iii) the charterer has the right to control the use of the vessel during the term of the contract and derives the economic benefits from such use.
The transition guidance associated with ASC 842 allows for certain practical expedients to the lessors. The Company elected to not separate the lease and non-lease components included in the time charter revenue because the pattern of revenue recognition for the lease and non-lease components (included in the daily hire rate) is the same. The daily hire rate represents the hire rate for a bare boat charter as well as the compensation for expenses incurred running the vessel such as crewing expense, repairs, insurance, maintenance and lubes. Both the lease and non-lease components are earned by passage of time.
F- 45 |
NAVIOS MARITIME HOLDINGS INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars — except share data)
As a result of the adoption of these standards, there was no effect on the Company’s opening accumulated deficit, consolidated balance sheets and consolidated statements of comprehensive income/(loss).
Land lease agreements
As of December 31, 2022, Navios Logistics had land lease agreements whose remaining lease terms ranged from
years to years.Office lease agreements
As of December 31, 2022, Navios Logistics had office lease agreements whose remaining lease terms ranged from
years to years.Liquid Barges leasing contract
On April 28, 2022, the Company entered into a “ ” leasing contract for eight liquid barges. As of December 31, 2022, two liquid barges were delivered to Navios Logistics whose remaining lease terms was five years. In the first quarter of 2023, another two liquid barges under the lease contract were delivered and are repayable by consecutive monthly payments of approximately $ each. The contract matures in the first quarter of 2028.
ASC 842 requires that the leases be classified as either finance or operating arrangements, with such classification affecting the pattern and classification of expense recognition in an entity’s income statement. For operating leases, ASC 842 requires recognition in an entity’s income statement of a single lease expense, calculated so that the cost of the lease is allocated over the lease term, generally on a straight-line basis. Right-of-use assets represent a right to use an underlying asset for the lease term and the related lease liability represents an obligation to make lease payments pursuant to the contractual terms of the lease agreement.
December 31, 2022 |
December 31, 2021 | ||||
Operating lease assets | |||||
Land lease agreements | |
||||
Office lease agreements | |
||||
Liquid Barges leasing contract | | ||||
Total | $ | $ | |||
Operating lease liabilities, current portion | |||||
Land lease agreements | ( |
( | |||
Office lease agreements | |
||||
Liquid Barges leasing contract | |||||
Total | $ | $ | |||
Operating lease liabilities, net of current portion | |||||
Land lease agreements | |
||||
Office lease agreements | |
||||
Liquid Barges leasing contract | |||||
Total | $ | $ |
At lease commencement, the Company determines a discount rate to calculate the present value of the lease payments so that it can determine lease classification and measure the lease liability. In determining the discount rate to be used at lease commencement, the Company used its incremental borrowing rate as there was no implicit rate included in land lease agreements, office lease agreements and liquid barges leasing contracts that can be readily determinable. The incremental borrowing rate is the rate that reflects the interest a lessee would have to pay to borrow funds on a collateralized basis over a similar term and in a similar economic environment. The Company then applied the respective incremental borrowing rates to each lease based on the remaining lease term of the specific lease. Navios Logistics’ incremental borrowing rate upon adoption relating to land and office lease agreements was
F- 46 |
NAVIOS MARITIME HOLDINGS INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars — except share data)
The tables below present the components of the Company’s lease expense for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020:
Year Ended December 31, 2022 |
Year Ended December 31, 2021 |
Year Ended December 31, 2020 | ||||||
Lease expense for charter-in contracts | $ | $ | |
$ | ||||
Lease expense for land lease agreements | |
|||||||
Lease expense for office lease agreements | ||||||||
Total | $ | $ | $ |
Lease expenses for charter-in contracts are included in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income/(loss) under the caption “Time charter, voyage and logistics business expenses”. Lease expenses for land lease agreements and office lease agreements are included in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income/(loss) under the captions “Time charter, voyage and logistics business expenses” and “General and administrative expenses”, respectively.
On July 29, 2022, the Company completed the sale of its charter-in and bareboat-in vessels to Navios Partners. For further information see Note 3 “Discontinued operations” in the consolidated financial statements.
The table below provides the total amount of lease payments on an undiscounted basis on our office lease agreements, land lease agreements and liquid barges leasing contract as of December 31, 2022:
Land Leases | Office space | Liquid Barges | ||||||
December 31, 2023 | $ | |
$ | |
$ | |||
December 31, 2024 | |
|
||||||
December 31, 2025 | |
|
||||||
December 31, 2026 | |
|
||||||
December 31, 2027 | |
|
||||||
December 31, 2028 and thereafter | |
| ||||||
Total | ||||||||
Operating lease liabilities, including current portion | ||||||||
Discount based on incremental borrowing rate | $ | $ | $ |
As of December 31, 2022, the weighted average remaining lease terms on our office lease agreements, land leases and liquid barges leasing agreements are
As of December 31, 2021, the weighted average remaining lease terms on our office lease agreements and land leases are
Charter-out vessels, barges and pushboats:
The future minimum revenue, net of commissions for the Company’s logistics business, expected to be earned on non-cancelable time charters, COA’s with minimum guaranteed volumes and contracts with minimum guaranteed throughput in Navios Logistics’ ports expected to be earned on non-cancelable time charters, are as follows:
Amount | ||
2023 | $ | |
2024 | ||
2025 | | |
2026 | | |
2027 | ||
2028 and thereafter | | |
Total | $ |
F- 47 |
NAVIOS MARITIME HOLDINGS INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars — except share data)
NOTE 16: TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PARTIES
Vessel Operating Expenses (management fees): Prior to the Transaction and pursuant to a management agreement dated
Navios Partners Guarantee: In
(as amended in March 2014), the Company entered into an agreement with Navios Partners (the “Navios Partners Guarantee”) to provide Navios Partners with guarantees against counterparty default on certain existing charters, which had previously been covered by the charter insurance for the same vessels, same periods and same amounts. In April 2021, the Company paid the amount of $ to Navios Partners as the final settlement of the outstanding balance of the claim.General and Administrative Expenses: Pursuant to an administrative services agreement with the Manager dated
Pursuant to an administrative services agreement with the Manager dated August 29, 2019, NSM provides administrative services to Navios Logistics. Total general and administrative fees for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020 amounted to $
, $ and $ , respectively, and are presented under the caption “General and administrative expenses”.Balance due to/from affiliate companies: Balance due to NSM as of December 31, 2022 and 2021 amounted to $
As of December 31, 2022 the balance mainly consisted of payments to the Manager in accordance with the Administrative Agreement.
Midstream General Partner Option Agreement:
F- 48 |
NAVIOS MARITIME HOLDINGS INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars — except share data)
Sale of Vessels and Sale of Rights to Navios Partners: In March 2021, Navios Holdings completed the sale to Navios Partners of the Navios Centaurus, a of the Navios Ray, a built vessel of dwt, and the Navios Bonavis, a built vessel of dwt, for a sale price of $ and the sale of the Navios Koyo, a -built vessel, previously chartered-in by Navios Holdings, for a sale price of $ . In July 2021, Navios Holdings completed the sale to Navios Partners of the Navios Azimuth, a built vessel of dwt, for a sale price of $ .
-built vessel of dwt, and the Navios Avior, a -built vessel of dwt, for a sale price of $ , including working capital adjustments. In June 2021, Navios Holdings completed the sale to Navios PartnersIn September 2022, Navios Holdings completed the sale of its -vessel dry bulk fleet to Navios Partners. For further information see Note 3 “Discontinued operations” in consolidated financial statements.
Secured credit facility with Navios Logistics (Grimaud Loan): On
As of December 31, 2022, the total amount of this facility was repaid in full, as described below.
On June 24, 2020, Navios Logistics assigned its legal and beneficial right, title and interest in the credit facility to its wholly-owned subsidiary Grimaud Ventures S.A. (“Grimaud”).
On June 25, 2020, Navios Holdings and Grimaud amended the Grimaud Loan to allow a portion of the total interest payable to be effected in common shares of Navios Holdings. On July 10, 2020, Navios Holdings issued shares of common stock to Navios Logistics and paid Navios Logistics $ in satisfaction of the interest payable in respect of this facility.
Effective as of May 2021, and upon the release of certain collateral, the facility bore interest of
On
On July 13, 2021, the Grimaud Loan plus accrued interest was repaid by the Company in full through the issuance of
NSM Loan: On
In December 2021, the Company entered into an amended and restated secured loan agreement with NSM in order to refinance the outstanding balance of this facility through the NSM Loan I (as defined herein). As of December 31, 2022, and following the refinancing, the NSM Loan was fully repaid.
F- 49 |
NAVIOS MARITIME HOLDINGS INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars — except share data)
$50.0 million NSM Loan: In
On July 12, 2021, the Company refinanced the total outstanding balance of $
$115.0 million NSM Loan: In
Both tranches bore interest at a rate of
On
In December 2021, the Company entered into an amended and restated secured loan agreement with NSM in order to refinance the outstanding balance of that facility through the NSM Loan I (as defined herein). As of December 31, 2022, and following the refinancing, the $115.0 million NSM Loan was fully repaid. As of December 31, 2022, the Company wrote off $
NSM Loan I: In
In the third quarter of 2022, the outstanding balance under NSM Loan I was fully repaid using cash received from the Transaction. Such repayment was mandatory as per the terms of the loan agreement. For further information see Note 3 “Discontinued operations” in the consolidated financial statements.
NSM Loan II: In
In the third quarter of 2022, the outstanding balance under NSM Loan II was fully repaid using cash received from the Transaction. Such repayment was mandatory as per the terms of the loan agreement. For further information see Note 3 “Discontinued operations” in the consolidated financial statements.
Upon completion of the refinancing in January 2022, NSM received an upfront fee of $
F- 50 |
NAVIOS MARITIME HOLDINGS INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars — except share data)
Convertible Debenture: In December 2021, Navios Holdings entered into the Convertible Debenture with NSM, covering an upfront fee of $
Navios Logistics’ Shareholders Agreement: On November 19, 2019, Navios Holdings entered into a shareholder agreement with Peers Business Inc. granting certain protections to minority shareholders in certain events.
Promissory note: On July 30, 2021, Navios Logistics issued a $ promissory note to Grimaud. The promissory note is payable in equal installments commencing on August 15, 2021. The Company has the ability to defer payment of one of the first three installments subject to certain conditions. On July 30, 2021, Grimaud entered into an assignment agreement with Peers Business Inc. (“Peers”), whereby the promissory note was assigned to Peers. Please refer to Note 17 “Preferred and Common Stock” to the consolidated financial statements. As of December 31, 2022, the Company had paid an amount of $relating to the promissory note. In February 2023, the remaining outstanding balance was repaid in full.
NOTE 17: PREFERRED AND COMMON STOCK
Series I Preferred Stock
In accordance with the terms of the Convertible Debenture, Navios Holdings issued
Series G and Series H American Depositary Shares Exchange Offer
On December 21, 2018, Navios Holdings announced that it commenced an offer to exchange cash and/or newly issued 2024 Notes for approximately 66 2/3% of each of the outstanding Series G Depositary Shares and Series H Depositary Shares.
As of March 21, 2019, a total of offer expenses, approximately $ as cash consideration and a total of approximately $ in aggregate principal amount of 2024 Notes. The difference between the carrying amount of the preferred shares redeemed and the fair value of the consideration transferred amounting to $ was recorded in accumulated deficit. Following the completion of the offer, the Company canceled the undeclared preferred dividend of Series H ADSs of $ .
Series H were validly tendered representing a net aggregate nominal value of approximately $ . Navios Holdings paid $ for tenderAs of April 18, 2019, a total of
Series G were validly tendered representing a net aggregate nominal value of approximately $ . Navios Holdings paid $ for tender offer expenses, approximately $ cash consideration and issued a total of approximately $ principal amount of 2024 Notes. The difference between the carrying amount of the preferred shares redeemed and the fair value of the consideration transferred amounting to $ was recorded in accumulated deficit. Following the completion of the offer, the company canceled the undeclared preferred dividend of series G of $ .In February 2016, Navios Holdings announced the suspension of payment of quarterly dividends on its preferred stock, including the Series G and Series H.
F- 51 |
NAVIOS MARITIME HOLDINGS INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars — except share data)
On July 15, 2017, Series G ADSs and Series H ADSs and as a result the respective dividend rate increased by .
in arrears relating to itsTotal undeclared preferred dividends as of December 31, 2022 and 2021 were $
On September 14, 2022, Navios Holdings commenced a tender offer to purchase up to $
Preferred stock was (Series G ADSs and, Series H ADSs) and (Series G ADSs and Series H ADSs) as of December 31, 2022 and 2021 respectively.
Vested, Surrendered and Forfeited
During 2022, the Company’s employees.
restricted stock units, issued toDuring 2021, the Company’s employees in 2017 vested.
restricted stock units, issued toDuring 2020, issued to the Company’s employees in 2017 and 2016 vested.
and restricted stock units,During the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020,
, and restricted shares of common stock, respectively, were forfeited upon termination of employment.Conversion of Preferred Stock
During the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, there were no conversions of preferred stock.
During the year ended December 31, 2020,
As of December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, the balance of convertible preferred stock was nil.
Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock
The Company’s Series G ADSs and the American Depositary Shares, Series H ADSs are recorded at fair market value on issuance. Each of the shares represents 1/100th of a share of the Series G ADSs and Series H ADSs, with a liquidation preference of $ per share ($ .00 per American Depositary Share). on the Series G ADSs at a rate of per annum and on the Series H ADSs at a rate of per annum of the stated liquidation preference. The Company has accounted for these shares as equity.
American Depositary Shares,Issuances to Employees, Officers and Directors
On December 21, 2022, pursuant to the stock plan approved by the Board of the Directors, restricted shares of common stock were granted to Navios Holdings officers and directors and issued on December 21, 2022.
On December 15, 2021, pursuant to the stock plan approved by the Board of the Directors,
restricted shares of common stock were granted to Navios Holdings officers and directors and issued on January 15, 2022.On December 21, 2020, pursuant to the stock plan approved by the Board of the Directors,
restricted shares of common stock were granted to Navios Holdings officers and directors and issued on January 19, 2021.During the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, no stock option was granted to Navios Holdings’ employees, officers and directors.
As of December 31, 2022, Navios Holdings has outstanding
shares. As of December 31, 2021, the Company had outstanding shares, from which shares are held by Navios Corporation.In October 2022,
shares held by Navios Corporation were canceled.F- 52 |
NAVIOS MARITIME HOLDINGS INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars — except share data)
Dividends from Navios Logistics—Acquisition of noncontrolling interest
On July 30, 2021, Navios Logistics declared and paid a pro rata dividend to the holders of its common equity in shares of Grimaud. All transactions were eliminated on a consolidated level as of that date. Immediately thereafter, Grimaud agreed to redeem the equity interests held by its non-controlling shareholder in full at fair market value, which was payable through $
As of December 31, 2022, the Company had paid an amount of $relating to the promissory note. In February 2023, the remaining outstanding balance was repaid in full.
Sale of Navios Holdings shares of common stock
On July 10, 2020, Navios Logistics declared and paid a $
dividend in cash or in Navios Holdings shares of common stock, from which Navios Holdings received shares and the amount of $ was paid to Navios Logistics’ noncontrolling shareholders.On February 21, 2020, Navios Logistics’ board of directors declared and paid a $
dividend, out of which the amount of $ was paid to Navios Holdings and the amount of $ to Navios Logistics’ noncontrolling shareholders.On July 13, 2021, the Company issued
NOTE 18: INTEREST EXPENSE AND FINANCE COST
Interest expense and finance cost consisted of the following:
For the Year Ended December 31, 2022 |
For the Year Ended December 31, 2021 |
For the Year Ended December 31, 2020 | ||||||
Interest expense | $ | $ | $ | |||||
Amortization and write-off of deferred financing costs | ||||||||
Other | ( | |||||||
Interest expense and financing cost | $ | $ | $ |
Basic earnings/(loss) per share is calculated by dividing net income/(loss) attributable to Navios Holdings common stockholders by the weighted average number of shares of Navios Holdings outstanding (excluding restricted shares) during the periods presented. Diluted income per common share is calculated by applying the treasury stock method. All unvested restricted stock units that have a dilutive effect are included in the calculation. The basic and diluted earnings per share for the period are presented for each category of participating common shares under the two-class method. The as converted number of common shares under the Convertible Debenture are deemed participating securities. Earnings are only allocated to participating securities in a period of net income (including income from continued and discontinued operations).
Net income/(loss) attributable to Navios Holdings common stockholders is calculated by adding to (if a discount) or deducting from (if a premium) net income/(loss) attributable to Navios Holdings common stockholders the difference between the fair value of the consideration paid upon redemption and the carrying value of the preferred stock, including the unamortized issuance costs of the preferred stock, and the amount of any undeclared dividend cancelled.
F- 53 |
NAVIOS MARITIME HOLDINGS INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars — except share data)
For the year ended December 31, 2022,
potential common shares and potential shares of convertible preferred stock are included in the calculation of diluted earnings per share.For the year ended December 31, 2021,
potential common shares and potential shares of convertible preferred stock are included in the calculation of diluted earnings per share.For the year ended December 31, 2020,
potential common shares and potential shares of convertible preferred stock have an anti-dilutive effect (i.e. those that increase income per share or decrease loss per share) and are therefore excluded from the calculation of diluted net loss per share.Year ended December 31, 2022 |
Year ended December 31, 2021 |
Year ended December 31, 2020 | |||||||
Numerator: | |||||||||
(Loss)/income attributable to Navios Holdings, from continuing operations | $ | ( |
$ | $ | ( | ||||
Less: | |||||||||
Undeclared dividend on preferred stock and on unvested restricted shares | ( |
( |
( | ||||||
Tender Offer — Redemption of preferred stock Series G ADSs and H ADSs including $8,949 of undeclared preferred dividend cancelled for the year ended December 31, 2022 | |
||||||||
Gain from eliminated dividend on preferred stock due to conversion | |||||||||
Undistributed income attributable to Series I Preferred Stock participating shares on an as converted basis from continuing operations | |||||||||
(Loss)/income attributable to Navios Holdings common stockholders, basic and diluted from continuing operations | $ | $ | $ | ( | |||||
Income/(loss) attributable to Navios Holdings common stockholders, basic and diluted from discontinued operations | ( | ||||||||
Less: | |||||||||
Undistributed income attributable to Series I Preferred Stock participating shares on an as converted basis from discontinued operations | ( |
||||||||
Income /(loss) attributable to Navios Holdings common stockholders, basic and diluted from discontinued operations | $ | $ | $ | ( | |||||
Net income/(loss) attributable to Navios Holdings common stockholders | $ | $ | $ | ( | |||||
Denominator: | |||||||||
Denominator for basic earnings/(loss) per share attributable to Navios Holdings common stockholders — weighted average shares | |
||||||||
Basic (loss)/earnings per share attributable to Navios Holdings common stockholders from continuing operations | $ | ( |
( | ||||||
Basic earnings/(loss) per share attributable to Navios Holdings common stockholders from discontinued operations | $ | |
$ | $ | ( | ||||
Basic earnings/(loss) per share attributable to Navios Holdings common stockholders | $ | |
$ | $ | ( | ||||
Denominator for diluted earnings/(loss) per share attributable to Navios Holdings common stockholders — weighted average shares | |
||||||||
Diluted (loss)/earnings per share attributable to Navios Holdings common stockholders from continuing operations | $ | ( |
( | ||||||
Diluted earnings/(loss) per share attributable to Navios Holdings common stockholders from discontinued operations | $ | |
$ | $ | ( | ||||
Diluted earnings/(loss) per share attributable to Navios Holdings common stockholders | $ | |
$ | $ | ( | ||||
Weighted average Number of Series I Preferred Stock participating preferred shares on an as converted basis, basic and diluted | |||||||||
Earnings per share to Series I Preferred Stock participating preferred shares on an as converted basis, basic and diluted | $ | $ | $ |
F- 54 |
NAVIOS MARITIME HOLDINGS INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars — except share data)
NOTE 20: INCOME TAXES
The Republic of the Marshall Islands, Liberia, Panama and Malta do not impose a tax on international shipping income. Under the laws of the Republic of the Marshall Islands, Malta, Liberia and Panama, the countries of incorporation of the Company and its subsidiaries and the vessels’ registration, the companies are subject to registration and tonnage taxes in the accompanying consolidated statements of comprehensive income/(loss).
In accordance with the currently applicable Greek law, ship owning companies of foreign-flagged vessels that are managed by Greek or foreign ship management companies having established an office/branch in Greece on the basis of the applicable licensing regime are subject to tax liability towards the Greek state which is calculated on the basis of the relevant vessel’s tonnage. A tax credit is recognized for tonnage tax (or similar tax) paid abroad, up to the amount of the tax due in Greece. The owner, the manager and the bareboat charterer or the financial lessee (where applicable) are liable to pay the tax due to the Greek state. The payment of said tax exhausts the tax liability of the foreign ship owning company, the bareboat charterer, the financial lessee (as applicable) and the relevant manager against any tax, duty, charge or contribution payable on income from the exploitation of the foreign-flagged vessel outside Greece.
The income tax (expense)/ benefit reflected in the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021, and 2020 is mainly attributable to Navios Holdings’ subsidiaries in South America, which are subject to the Argentinean, Brazilian and Paraguayan income tax regime.
CNSA and Corporacion Navios Granos S.A. (“CNGSA”) are located in a tax free zone and are not liable to income tax. Navios Logistics’ current port operations in Uruguay are exempted from income taxes.
As a result of the Law 27,630, voted by the Argentinian Parliament in June 2021, income tax rates and scales were modified. Scales are updated annually as per inflation Income tax liabilities of the Argentinean subsidiaries for the current period is measured at the amount expected to be paid to the taxation authorities using a tax rate of
Under the tax laws of Argentina, the subsidiaries of the Company in that country are subject to taxes levied on gross revenues. Rates differ depending on the jurisdiction where revenues are earned for tax purposes. Average rates were approximately
Until the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019, there were two possible options to determine the income tax liability of Paraguayan subsidiaries.
As per the tax reform in Paraguay that is in force since January 1, 2020 (Law 6,380 from September 25, 2019 confirmed by Decree 3182 from December 30, 2019), there are still two possible options to determine the income tax liability of Paraguayan companies.
F- 55 |
NAVIOS MARITIME HOLDINGS INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars — except share data)
The corporate income tax rate in Argentina, Paraguay, Brazil, and Uruguay is
NOTE 21: OTHER EXPENSE
During the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, taxes other-than-income taxes of Navios Logistics amounted to $
, $ , and $ , respectively, and were included in the statements of comprehensive income/(loss) under the caption “Other expense”.
NOTE 22: SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
There are no events subsequent to the balance sheet date that require disclosure.
F- 56 |
Exhibit 8.1
Subsidiaries Included in the Consolidation:
Ownership | Country of | Statements of Operations | ||||||||||
Company Name |
Nature |
Interest |
Incorporation |
2022 |
2021 |
2020 | ||||||
Navios Maritime Holdings Inc. |
Holding Company | Marshall Is. | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 | |||||||
Navios South American Logistics Inc. |
Sub-Holding Company | 63.8% | Marshall Is. | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 | ||||||
Navios Corporation |
Sub-Holding Company | 100% | Marshall Is. | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 | ||||||
Navios International Inc. |
Operating Company | 100% | Marshall Is. | 1/1 - 7/29 | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 | ||||||
Navimax Corporation |
Operating Company | 100% | Marshall Is. | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 | ||||||
Navios Handybulk Inc. |
Operating Company | 100% | Marshall Is. | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 | ||||||
Hestia Shipping Ltd. |
Operating Company | 100% | Malta | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 | ||||||
Anemos Maritime Holdings Inc. |
Sub-Holding Company | 100% | Marshall Is. | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 | ||||||
NAV Holdings Limited |
Sub-Holding Company | 100% | Malta | 1/1 - 9/8 | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 | ||||||
Kleimar N.V. |
Operating Company/ Vessel Owning Company/ Management Company |
100% | Belgium | 1/1 - 9/8 | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 | ||||||
Bulkinvest S.A. |
Operating Company | 100% | Luxembourg | 1/1 - 9/8 | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 | ||||||
Primavera Shipping Corporation |
Operating Company | 100% | Marshall Is. | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 | ||||||
Ginger Services Co. |
Operating Company | 100% | Marshall Is. | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 | ||||||
Aquis Marine Corp. |
Sub-Holding Company | 100% | Marshall Is. | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 | ||||||
Astra Maritime Corporation |
Vessel Owning Company | 100% | Marshall Is. | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 | ||||||
Achilles Shipping Corporation |
Operating Company | 100% | Marshall Is. | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 | ||||||
Apollon Shipping Corporation |
Operating Company | 100% | Marshall Is. | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 | ||||||
Herakles Shipping Corporation |
Operating Company | 100% | Marshall Is. | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 | ||||||
Hios Shipping Corporation |
Operating Company | 100% | Marshall Is. | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 | ||||||
Ionian Shipping Corporation |
Operating Company | 100% | Marshall Is. | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 | ||||||
Kypros Shipping Corporation |
Operating Company | 100% | Marshall Is. | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 | ||||||
Meridian Shipping Enterprises Inc. |
Vessel Owning Company |
100% | Marshall Is. | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 | ||||||
Mercator Shipping Corporation |
Vessel Owning Company | 100% | Marshall Is. | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 | ||||||
Arc Shipping Corporation |
Vessel Owning Company | 100% | Marshall Is. | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 | ||||||
Horizon Shipping Enterprises Corporation |
Vessel Owning Company | 100% | Marshall Is. | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 | ||||||
Magellan Shipping Corporation |
Vessel Owning Company | 100% | Marshall Is. | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 | ||||||
Aegean Shipping Corporation |
Operating Company | 100% | Marshall Is. | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 | ||||||
Star Maritime Enterprises Corporation |
Vessel Owning Company | 100% | Marshall Is. | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 | ||||||
Corsair Shipping Ltd. |
Vessel Owning Company | 100% | Marshall Is. | 1/1 - 9/8 | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 | ||||||
Rowboat Marine Inc. |
Operating Company | 100% | Marshall Is. | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 |
Rondine Management Corp. |
Vessel Owning Company | 100% | Marshall Is. | | 1/1 - 9/30 | 3/22 - 12/31 | ||||||
Vernazza Shiptrade Inc. |
Operating Company | 100% | Marshall Is. | 1/1 - 9/8 | 1/1 - 12/31 | 9/25 - 12/31 | ||||||
Beaufiks Shipping Corporation |
Operating Company | 100% | Marshall Is. | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 | ||||||
Nostos Shipmanagement Corp. |
Vessel Owning Company | 100% | Marshall Is. | | 1/1 - 6/30 | 1/1 - 12/31 | ||||||
Portorosa Marine Corp. |
Operating Company | 100% | Marshall Is. | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 | ||||||
Shikhar Ventures S.A. |
Vessel Owning Company | 100% | Liberia | 1/1 - 9/8 | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 | ||||||
Sizzling Ventures Inc. |
Operating Company | 100% | Liberia | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 | ||||||
Rheia Associates Co. |
Operating Company | 100% | Marshall Is. | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 | ||||||
Taharqa Spirit Corp. |
Operating Company | 100% | Marshall Is. | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 | ||||||
Rumer Holding Ltd. |
Vessel Owning Company | 100% | Marshall Is. | 1/1 - 9/8 | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 | ||||||
Pharos Navigation S.A. |
Vessel Owning Company | 100% | Marshall Is. | 1/1 - 9/8 | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 | ||||||
Pueblo Holdings Ltd. |
Vessel Owning Company | 100% | Marshall Is. | 1/1 - 9/8 | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 | ||||||
Quena Shipmanagement Inc. |
Operating Company | 100% | Marshall Is. | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 | ||||||
Aramis Navigation Inc. |
Vessel Owning Company | 100% | Marshall Is. | | 1/1 - 7/9 | 1/1 - 12/31 | ||||||
White Narcissus Marine S.A. |
Vessel Owning Company | 100% | Panama | 1/1 - 9/8 | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 | ||||||
Navios GP L.L.C. |
Operating Company | 100% | Marshall Is. | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 | ||||||
Red Rose Shipping Corp. |
Vessel Owning Company | 100% | Marshall Is. | 1/1 - 9/8 | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 | ||||||
Highbird Management Inc. |
Vessel Owning Company | 100% | Marshall Is. | 1/1 - 9/8 | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 | ||||||
Ducale Marine Inc. |
Vessel Owning Company | 100% | Marshall Is. | 1/1 - 9/8 | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 | ||||||
Vector Shipping Corporation |
Vessel Owning Company | 100% | Marshall Is. | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 | ||||||
Faith Marine Ltd. |
Vessel Owning Company | 100% | Liberia | 1/1 - 9/8 | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 | ||||||
Navios Maritime Finance (US) Inc. |
Operating Company | 100% | Delaware | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 | ||||||
Navios Maritime Finance II (US) Inc. |
Operating Company | 100% | Delaware | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 | ||||||
Tulsi Shipmanagement Co. |
Operating Company | 100% | Marshall Is. | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 | ||||||
Cinthara Shipping Ltd. |
Operating Company | 100% | Marshall Is. | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 | ||||||
Rawlin Services Company |
Operating Company | 100% | Marshall Is. | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 | ||||||
Mauve International S.A. |
Operating Company | 100% | Marshall Is. | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 | ||||||
Serenity Shipping Enterprises Inc. |
Vessel Owning Company | 100% | Marshall Is. | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 | ||||||
Mandora Shipping Ltd |
Vessel Owning Company | 100% | Marshall Is. | | 1/1 - 3/30 | 1/1 - 12/31 | ||||||
Solange Shipping Ltd. |
Vessel Owning Company | 100% | Marshall Is. | | 1/1 - 3/30 | 1/1 - 12/31 | ||||||
Diesis Ship Management Ltd. |
Operating Company | 100% | Marshall Is. | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 | ||||||
Navios Holdings Europe Finance Inc. |
Sub-Holding Company | 100% | Marshall Is. | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 | ||||||
Navios Asia LLC |
Sub-Holding Company | 100% | Marshall Is. | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 | ||||||
Iris Shipping Corporation |
Vessel Owning Company | 100% | Marshall Is. | 1/1 - 9/8 | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 |
Jasmine Shipping Corporation |
Vessel Owning Company | 100% | Marshall Is. | 1/1 - 9/8 | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 | ||||||
Emery Shipping Corporation |
Vessel Owning Company | 100% | Marshall Is. | | | 1/1 - 9/30 | ||||||
Lavender Shipping Corporation |
Vessel Owning Company | 100% | Marshall Is. | | 1/1 - 6/30 | 1/1 - 12/31 | ||||||
Roselite Shipping Corporation |
Operating Company | 100% | Marshall Is. | 1/1 - 9/8 | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 | ||||||
Smaltite Shipping Corporation |
Operating Company | 100% | Marshall Is. | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 | ||||||
Motiva Trading Ltd. |
Operating Company | 100% | Marshall Is. | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 | ||||||
Alpha Merit Corporation |
Sub-Holding Company | 100% | Marshall Is. | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 | ||||||
Thalassa Marine S.A. |
Operating Company | 100% | Marshall Is. | 1/1 - 7/29 | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 | ||||||
Asteroid Shipping S.A. |
Operating Company | 100% | Marshall Is. | 1/1 - 7/29 | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 | ||||||
Cloud Atlas Marine S.A. |
Operating Company | 100% | Marshall Is. | 1/1 - 7/29 | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 | ||||||
Heodor Shipping Inc. |
Vessel Owning Company | 100% | Marshall Is. | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 | ||||||
Pacifico Navigation Corp. |
Vessel Owning Company | 100% | Marshall Is. | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 | ||||||
Rider Shipmanagement Inc. |
Operating Company | 100% | Marshall Is. | 1/1 - 7/29 | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 | ||||||
Talia Shiptrade S.A. |
Operating Company | 100% | Marshall Is. | 1/1 - 7/29 | 1/1 - 12/31 | 1/1 - 12/31 | ||||||
Moonstone Shipping Corporation |
Vessel Owning Company | 100% | Marshall Is. | 1/1 - 9/8 | 6/30 - 12/31 | | ||||||
Opal Shipping Corporation |
Vessel Owning Company | 100% | Marshall Is. | 1/1 - 9/8 | 6/30 - 12/31 | | ||||||
Grimaud Ventures S.A. |
Operating Company | 100% | Marshall Is. | 1/1 - 12/31 | 7/30 - 12/31 | | ||||||
Anafi Shipping Corporation |
Operating Company | 100% | Marshall Is. | 5/12 - 9/8 | | |
Exhibit 12.1
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Angeliki Frangou, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Navios Maritime Holdings Inc. (the registrant);
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting
Date: March 27, 2023
/s/ Angeliki Frangou |
Angeliki Frangou |
Chief Executive Officer |
(Principal Executive Officer) |
Exhibit 12.2
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Georgios Akhniotis, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Navios Maritime Holdings Inc. (the registrant);
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
Date: March 27, 2023
/s/ Georgios Akhniotis |
Georgios Akhniotis |
Chief Financial Officer |
(Principal Financial Officer) |
Exhibit 13.1
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO § 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Navios Maritime Holdings Inc. (the Company) for the annual period ended December 31, 2022 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Angeliki Frangou, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to the best of her knowledge:
(i) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
(ii) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
Date: March 27, 2023 | /s/ Angeliki Frangou | |||||
Angeliki Frangou | ||||||
Chief Executive Officer |
Exhibit 13.2
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO § 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Navios Maritime Holdings Inc. (the Company) for the annual period ended December 31, 2022 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Georgios Akhniotis, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to the best of his knowledge:
(i) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
(ii) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
Date: March 27, 2023 | /s/ Georgios Akhniotis | |||
Georgios Akhniotis | ||||
Chief Financial Officer |
Exhibit 15.1
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-202141 and 333-222002) of Navios Maritime Holdings Inc. of our report dated March 27, 2023 relating to the financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 20-F.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers S.A.
Athens, Greece
March 27, 2023
Exhibit 15.2
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements:
(a) | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-202141) of Navios Maritime Holdings Inc. and |
(b) | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-222002) of Navios Maritime Holdings Inc. |
of our reports dated March 24, 2023, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Navios Maritime Partners L.P. and the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting of Navios Maritime Partners L.P., incorporated by reference in this Annual Report (Form 20-F) of Navios Maritime Holdings Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2022.
/s/ Ernst & Young (Hellas) Certified Auditors Accountants S.A.
Athens, Greece
March 27, 2023